Skip to main content

Table 2 Gene annotation and reported QTLs for the shared genomic regions between runs of homozygosity (ROH) hotspots and the putative sweep regions retrieved from the within-population and cross-populations DCMS statistics

From: Genome-wide detection of signatures of selection in indicine and Brazilian locally adapted taurine cattle breeds using whole-genome re-sequencing data

BTA1

Start

End

Genes

QTL2

Within-population DCMS statistic x ROH

 1

8,300,000

8,350,000

–

Somatic cell score [27]

 1

41,600,000

41,650,000

EPHA6, ARL6

Maturity rate [28]

 1

112,250,000

112,300,000

KCNAB1

–

 8

15,800,000

15,850,000

–

Tick resistance [29]

 15

35,365,655

35,399,999

OTOG

–

 15

35,400,001

35,450,000

–

–

 18

34,718,675

34,750,000

CDH16, RRAD

–

 21

6,550,000

6,600,000

ADAMTS17

Calving ease [30]

 21

63,250,000

63,300,000

VRK1

Interval to first estrus after calving [31]

Cross-population DCMS statistic x ROH

 3

77,250,000

77,300,000

–

Body condition score [23]

 5

31,800,000

31,850,000

–

Body weight (yearling) [24], Conception rate [32]

 5

38,761,637

38,761,745

YAF2

 

 7

57,050,000

57,100,000

–

Rump angle [33]

 11

67,450,000

67,500,000

ANTXR1, GFPT1

Body weight (yearling) [24], Body energy content [34]

 11

67,700,000

67,749,999

–

–

 11

67,750,001

67,800,000

NFU1

–

 11

68,550,000

68,600,000

PCYOX1

–

 14

52,900,000

52,914,848

–

Maturity rate [28]

 15

10,150,000

10,200,000

–

–

 15

10,900,000

10,950,000

–

Calving ease (maternal) [35], Daughter pregnancy rate [35], Foot angle [35], Milk fat percentage [35], Milk fat yield [35], Net merit [35], Length of productive life [35], Milk protein percentage [35], Milk protein yield [35], Calving ease [35], Somatic cell score [35]

 20

38,000,000

38,050,000

RANBP3L, NADK2

Milk protein percentage [36], Milk protein yield [37], Milk yield [37], Coat texture [38]

 21

200,000

250,000

–

–

 25

1,345,564

1,350,000

NME3, MRPS34

Milk fat yield [39]

  1. 1 BTA: Bos taurus autosome; 2 QTLs within the candidate genomic regions are highlighted in bold. Non-bold QTLs were the closest and most suitable candidate QTL for the given candidate region