Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic diversity indices for the Penaeus monodon populations sampled

From: Fine-scale population structure and evidence for local adaptation in Australian giant black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) using SNP analysis

Population

N

AR (± SD)

APR (± SD)

PPL (Av. MAF)

Ho (± SD)

HE (± SD)

Av. MLH (± SD)

FIS (p <  0.05)

NeLD[95% C.I.]

Bramston Beach (BB)

60

1.66 ± 0.39

0.004 ± 0.039

0.79 (0.13)

0.13 ± 0.15

0.15 ± 0.16

0.13 ± 0.01

0.12

24,121.6 [11,024.4- ∞]

Etty Bay (EB)

50

1.66 ± 0.40

0.01 ± 0.05

0.77 (0.14)

0.13 ± 0.15

0.15 ± 0.16

0.13 ± 0.02

0.14

147.5 [146–149]

Townsville (TSV)

22

1.68 ± 0.45

0.03 ± 0.13

0.69 (0.15)

0.13 ± 0.16

0.15 ± 0.17

0.13 ± 0.004

0.10

2504.6 [17,897.9 – 4175.2]

Gulf of Carpentaria (GC)

33

1.74 ± 0.39

0.01 ± 0.07

0.80 (0.15)

0.15 ± 0.15

0.17 ± 0.17

0.15 ± 0.02

0.13

1427.4 [1263.1 –1640.5]

Joseph Bonaparte Gulf (JBG)

34

1.74 ± 0.38

0.01 ± 0.06

0.81 (0.14)

0.15 ± 0.16

0.17 ± 0.17

0.15 ± 0.004

0.11

7065.4 [4454.1 – 15,832]

Tiwi Island (TIW)

56

1.75 ± 0.34

0.01 ± 0.06

0.87 (0.13)

0.15 ± 0.15

0.17 ± 0.16

0.15 ± 0.004

0.12

8125.2 [5853.9 – 13,264.8]

Nickol Bay (NKB)

23

1.61 ± 0.48

0.03 ± 0.14

0.62 (0.18)

0.16 ± 0.20

0.16 ± 0.18

0.16 ± 0.04

− 0.04

165.4 [159.9–171.2]

  1. The parameters calculated number of samples (N), mean allelic richness values (AR), private allelic richness (APR), percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL, average MAF of polymorphic loci), mean observed heterozygosity (HO), average expected heterozygosity (HE), average multi-locus heterozygosity (Av. MLH), inbreeding coefficient (FIS), and effective population size (NeLD)