Analysis of codon usage patterns in citrus based on coding sequence data

BMC Genomics

Table 1 GC content of CDS across 8 Citrus Species

Citrus Species	Variety	Genes	GC%	GC₁%	GC₂%	GC₃%	GC₃ _s%	ENC
Atlantia buxifolia	Atalantia	59755	43.51	50.70	40.47	39.35	37.08	52.48
Fortunella hindsii	Mandarin	48789	43.80	50.85	40.53	40.01	37.74	52.47
Citrus grandis	Pummelo	38039	43.79	50.67	40.56	40.13	37.87	52.55
Citrus sinensis	Sweet	40773	43.50	50.52	40.12	39.87	37.59	52.44
Citrus medica	Citron	40808	43.70	50.63	40.49	39.98	37.70	52.63
Citrus reticulata ‘Mangshan’	Mandarin	36852	43.59	50.51	40.32	39.94	37.66	52.65
Citrus ichangensis	Papeda	36936	43.77	50.58	40.54	40.20	37.93	52.59
Citrus clementina	Mandarin	29687	43.73	50.57	40.35	40.28	38.02	52.83
Average	-	41455	43.67	50.63	40.42	39.97	37.70	52.58

Genes represents the number of sequences after filtering; GC1, GC2 and GC3 represent the GC content of the first, second, third base of codon; GC3s represents the GC content of the third synonymous position; ENC represents the effective number of codons

ISSN: 1471-2164