Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparative analyses of the Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Hymenoscyphus albidus genomes reveals potentially adaptive differences in secondary metabolite and transposable element repertoires

Original Submission
9 Dec 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Malin Elfstrand
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Malin Elfstrand
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Malin Elfstrand
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Jun 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Malin Elfstrand
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Jun 2021 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12864-021-07837-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page