Skip to main content

Table 1 Details of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified for pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) resistance

From: Mapping pre-harvest sprouting resistance loci in AAC Innova × AAC Tenacious spring wheat population

QTL Name

Chr

Position

Intervalmax

LODmax

Additive effectmax

%R2max

Environment(s) CIM and MCIM

Closest marker and position

Donor allele

Name

cM

nt

QPhs.lrdc-1A.1

1A

27.80

27.6–30.8

2.55

0.32

5.0

Ithaca 2018, Pooled

tplb0036l23_696

27.59

16,056,699

T

QPhs.lrdc-1A.2

1A

60.40

58.4–64.0

6.66

0.63

14.0

Edmonton 2019

Ku_c44068_601

60.27

38,215,835

T

QPhs.lrdc-1A.3

1A

81.90

79.1–82.7

5.14

0.62

9.0

Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

Kukri_c25215_124

81.85

493,658,123

T

QPhs.lrdc-2A

2A

106.40

105.4–107.4

2.85

0.63

5.0

Lethbridge 2019

BS00090569_51

106.37

657,329,310

T

QPhs.lrdc-2B.1

2B

82.00

81.3–82.5a

5.01

1.43

10.0

Edmonton 2019, Pooled

Tdurum_contig1653_190

82.00

107,712,408

T

QPhs.lrdc-2B.2

2B

90.00

86.7–91.6a

NA

0.84

2.1

Edmonton 2019, Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2018, Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

Ku_c69635_2786

89.96

110,037,917

I

QPhs.lrdc-2D.1

2D

42.40

38.7–45.3

2.55

0.62

5.0

Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

wsnp_CAP12_c1503_764765

42.37

37,927,516

T

QPhs.lrdc-2D.2

2D

101.30

98.8–102.2

3.40

0.34

6.0

Ithaca 2018

Ex_c2115_3369

104.08

437,187,123

T

QPhs.lrdc-3A.1

3A

8.20

6.3–9.3

12.00

1.16

19.0

Edmonton 2019, Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2018, Pooled

Tdurum_contig83209_316

7.61

1,253,899

T

QPhs.lrdc-3A.2

3A

19.60

18.6–27.9

4.82

0.84

9.0

Lethbridge 2019

Ra_c9347_163

19.54

35,795,572

T

QPhs.lrdc-3B.1

3B

1.70

0.7–2.3

2.89

0.53

4.0

Lethbridge 2018, Pooled

BS00001400_51

1.69

860,129

I

QPhs.lrdc-3B.2

3B

157.30

156.1–162.8

7.20

0.59

13.0

Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

BS00057988_51

157.58

774,477,527

T

QPhs.lrdc-3D.1

3D

17.20

12.4–32.9

4.21

0.80

10.0

Lethbridge 2018

wsnp_Ex_c7780_13254349

18.67

346,008,587

I

QPhs.lrdc-3D.2

3D

122.20

107.6–138.4

6.18

0.48

12.0

Ithaca 2018, Pooled

BS00067163_51

117.07

573,581,940

T

QPhs.lrdc-4A

4A

45.60

45.3–48.9

6.14

0.78

9.0

Edmonton 2019, Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2018, Pooled

wsnp_Ex_rep_c67799_66488792

45.53

65,464,862

T

QPhs.lrdc-4B

4B

61.00

60.6–63.1

3.83

0.61

6.0

Lethbridge 2018, Pooled

wsnp_Ex_c25373_34639805

60.99

481,850,259

T

QPhs.lrdc-4D

4D

74.00

72.1–75.6

2.60

0.52

4.0

Lethbridge 2018

BS00047797_51

76.15

456,267,708

I

QPhs.lrdc-5A.1

5A

57.10

56.4–57.3

2.61

0.36

4.0

Pooled

GENE-3502_206

57.04

160,103,231

I

QPhs.lrdc-5A.2

5A

123.60

123.6–123.6

2.50

0.37

5.0

Edmonton 2019

BS00065292_51

123.50

556,978,174

T

QPhs.lrdc-7A

7A

192.20

190.8–193.9

2.65

0.49

4.0

Ithaca 2018, Lethbridge 2018, Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

TA003093–1305

192.01

637,205,996

T

QPhs.lrdc-7D

7D

89.20

70.5–106.6

6.21

1.20

18.0

Lethbridge 2019, Pooled

D_GCE8AKX02ILA1U_88

79.82

56,638,676

I

  1. Note - Chr chromosome, Intervalmax QTL interval (cM) calculated using markers identified in composite interval mapping (CIM) or mixed-model based composite interval mapping (MCIM) based on all the environments; ‘cM’ and ‘nt’ positions are based on AAC Innova/AAC Tenacious linkage map and IWGSC RefSeq v.2 physical map/genome, respectively
  2. aQTL interval based on MCIM results only; LODmax, Additive effectmax and %R2max: highest score reported in any single environment or pooled data, additive effect is shown as absolute value; NA: QTL detected using MCIM only and no LOD score was calculated; Donor allele: T – AAC Tenacious, I – AAC Innova