Table 2 The quality of the data
Sample | Raw data | Clean data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw reads | Raw bases | Q30(%) | GC content (%) | Clean reads | Clean bases | Q30(%) | GC content (%) | |
HBliver1 | 48,489,378 | 7,321,896,078 | 95.22 | 48.19 | 48,180,388 | 7,199,237,284 | 95.66 | 48.11 |
HBliver2 | 47,969,462 | 7,243,388,762 | 94.87 | 48.63 | 47,645,964 | 7,098,373,630 | 95.28 | 48.56 |
HBliver3 | 50,753,940 | 7,663,844,940 | 95.03 | 48.38 | 50,389,498 | 7,521,948,858 | 95.52 | 48.26 |
HNliver1 | 50,712,282 | 7,657,554,582 | 94.61 | 48.03 | 50,337,890 | 7,505,378,909 | 95.15 | 47.91 |
HNliver2 | 48,162,454 | 7,272,530,554 | 94.93 | 48.43 | 47,821,790 | 7,130,597,017 | 95.44 | 48.3 |
HNliver3 | 51,403,388 | 7,761,911,588 | 94.74 | 48.47 | 51,011,834 | 7,605,795,873 | 95.29 | 48.34 |
NNliver1 | 49,380,860 | 7,456,509,860 | 94.72 | 48.35 | 49,030,494 | 7,333,574,616 | 95.18 | 48.25 |
NNliver2 | 51,600,530 | 7,791,680,030 | 94.82 | 48.31 | 51,232,236 | 7,636,747,653 | 95.36 | 48.18 |
NNliver3 | 52,374,338 | 7,908,525,038 | 94.67 | 48.34 | 51,966,604 | 7,748,338,294 | 95.21 | 48.21 |