Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis results for NSR vs. CR comparison

From: Transcriptome analysis of blastoderms exposed to prolonged egg storage and short periods of incubation during egg storage

Network Score

Top Functions

42

Cell Cycle, Cellular Assembly and Organization, DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair

42

Protein Synthesis

42

Cell Cycle

Regulators in Network

Score

Targets

Functions

RABL6

13

12

Cell cycle progression, Embryo death

CDKN1B, E2F2, LIN9, MYBL2, RABL6, RBL1, TASP1

12

37

G1/S phase transition

E2F2, LIN9, mir-145

10.4

24

Cell cycle progression, Organismal death

Upstream Regulator

Fold

Molecule Type

Activation z-score

P Value

TWNK

−1.811

enzyme

−3

5.17E-06

ACTL6A

−1.699

other

−2.236

0.00805

GNL3

−1.713

other

−2.236

0.0148

TCF3

1.645

transcription regulator

2.613

8.18E-06

Master Regulator

Fold

Molecule Type

Activation z-score

P Value

BIRC5

−1.985

other

−8.472

0.0001

SRSF2

−2.236

transcription regulator

−6.146

0.0001

PDCD4

2.187

other

−5.543

0.0001

TFDP1

−1.871

transcription regulator

−5.489

0.0001

CCNE1

−2.423

transcription regulator

−5.384

0.0001

COPS2

−1.639

other

5.514

0.0001

APLP2

1.835

other

5.846

0.0001

HEXIM1

−1.604

transcription regulator

5.996

0.0001

UCHL1

−1.581

peptidase

6.068

0.0001

BARD1

1.961

transcription regulator

6.072

0.0001

  1. The top three networks (network score > 40) and top three regulator effect networks (consistency score > 0, target number > 3, |z-score| > 2, p-value < 0.05) are shown. The top five activated (z-score > 2) and inhibited (z-score < −2) upstream regulators and master regulators in causal networks are shown (|fold change| > 1.5, |z-score| > 2, p-value < 0.05). Only upstream regulators and master regulators exhibiting differential expression between NSR and CR groups are displayed