Skip to main content

Table 5 Effect of the LEPR genotype on body weight (BW), back fat depth (BF) and back muscle depth (BM) of ewes throughout the productive cycle

From: Genome-wide analyses reveal a strong association between LEPR gene variants and body fat reserves in ewes

 

TT

TC

CC

Sign.

n

107

442

485

 

BW-M

53.20 (0.47) a

52.4 (0.26) ab

51.9 (0.25) b

*

BW-Pa

56.50 (0.5) a

55.4 (0.28) ab

54.86 (0.27) b

*

BW-Pb

61.10 (0.52) a

60.4 (0.29) a

59.6 (0.28) b

*

BW-L

59.5 (0.75) a

58.3 (0.57) ab

57.8 (0.56) b

*

BW-Sa

58.6 (0.58)

58.2 (0.34)

57.8 (0.33)

NS

BW-Sb

60.2 (0.73)

59.8 (0.45)

59.6 (0.44)

NS

BW-W

56.2 (0.55)

56.0 (0.30)

55.7 (0.29)

NS

BW-Wp

57.5 (0.54)

57.3 (0.31)

56.8 (0.30)

NS

BF-M

5.44 (0.3) a

5.1 (0.2) ab

4.9 (0.2) b

*

BF-Pb

5.0 (0.2) a

4.3 (0.2) b

4.2 (0.2) b

**

BF-W

4.5 (0.3)

4.3 (0.2)

4.3 (0.2)

NS

BM-M

22.5 (0.7)

22.3 (0.5)

22.3 (0.5)

NS

BM-Pb

21.5 (0.7) a

19.7 (0.5) b

19.8 (0.5) b

*

BM-W

19.6 (0.9)

19.4 (0.7)

18.9 (0.7)

NS

  1. Values reported are lsmeans (± standard error) obtained from the mixed model with repeated measurements over successive productive cycles. Sign. indicates the significant overall effect of the LEPR genotype on the trait at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. NS, not significant. Different letter superscripts (a, b, c) show a significant difference between genotypes at p < 0.05. n (%), proportion of ewes in each genotype; M Mating, Pa Early pregnancy, Pb Two-thirds pregnancy, L Lambing, Sa Early suckling, Sb End of suckling, W Weaning, Wp Post-weaning period, BW body weight in kg, BF back fat thickness in mm, BM back muscle thickness in mm