Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparative analysis of two genomes of Chlamydia pecorum isolates from an Alpine chamois and a water buffalo

Original Submission
17 Dec 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Apr 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 2
6 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 3
11 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 4
13 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
19 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 7
19 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
19 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 8
19 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
5 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Aug 2022 Author responded Author comments - Sara Rigamonti
Resubmission - Version 9
11 Aug 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
18 Aug 2022 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12864-022-08860-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page