Skip to main content

Table 3 Spearman’s correlations of marker order between Pinus radiata parental linkage mapsa

From: High density linkage maps, genetic architecture, and genomic prediction of growth and wood properties in Pinus radiata

LGb

850,055 vs 850,096

850,055 vs 268,345

850,055 vs 268,405

850,096 vs 268,345

850,096 vs 268,405

268,345 vs 268,405

1

0.94 (39)***

0.93 (25)***

0.97 (58)***

0.93 (23)***

0.96 (59)***

0.97 (23)***

2

0.97 (65)***

0.99 (41)***

0.97 (75)***

0.99 (21)***

0.96 (60)***

0.95 (17)***

3

0.97 (37)***

0.95 (19)***

0.96 (50)***

0.97 (11)***

0.94 (43)***

0.86 (11)**

4

0.94 (19)***

0.97 (23)***

0.99 (44)***

0.99 (10)***

0.95 (25)***

0.90 (15)***

5

0.98 (29)***

0.96 (18)***

0.98 (50)***

0.98 (17)***

0.93 (42)***

0.95 (10)***

6

0.90 (9)***

1.00 (8)***

0.97 (37)***

0.95 (8)**

0.96 (31)***

0.89 (7)*

7

0.94 (23)***

0.90 (5)n.s.

0.97 (51)***

0.93 (7)**

0.95 (42)***

1.00 (6)**

8

0.81 (32)***

0.93 (12)***

0.98 (54)***

0.95 (8)**

0.95 (36)***

1.00 (4) n.s.

9

0.95 (51)***

0.97 (13)***

0.97 (43)***

0.95 (20)***

0.98 (50)***

0.80 (4) n.s.

10

0.88 (17)***

0.84 (10)**

0.91 (38)***

0.92 (11)***

0.97 (49)***

0.98 (14)***

11

0.97 (27)***

0.99 (16)***

0.98 (42)***

0.89 (12)***

0.98 (39)***

1.00 (7)***

12

0.97 (30)***

0.95 (18)***

0.98 (54)***

1.0 (7)***

0.95 (41)***

1.00 (6)**

Mean

0.94 (31.5)

0.95 (17.3)

0.97 (49.7)

0.95 (12.9)

0.96 (43.1)

0.94 (10.3)

  1. aBased on P. taeda contigs common to parental maps. Where multiple markers represented a single contig, the mean position of these markers was used. (#) = The number of contigs used in the comparison for each linkage group. * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.01, *** = P < 0.001