Table 2 Analysis of gene gain and loss by family in the analyzed speciesa
From: Comparative analysis of detoxification-related gene superfamilies across five hemipteran species
Family | CYPMIT | CYP2 | CYP3 | CYP4 | GST | CCE | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duplications | |||||||
 Clec | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 43 |
 Rpro | 0 | 0 | 34 | 38 | 2 | 39 | 113 |
 (Clec + Rpro) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
 Hhal | 0 | 0 | 25 | 11 | 5 | 33 | 74 |
 Nvir | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 21 |
 (Hhal + Nvir) | 2 | 0 | 43 | 27 | 12 | 44 | 128 |
 (Clec + Rpro) + (Hhal + Nvir) | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 36 |
 Nlug | 3 | 1 | 9 | 21 | 5 | 30 | 33 |
Losses | |||||||
 Clec | 1 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 23 |
 Rpro | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 21 |
 (Clec + Rpro) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
 Hhal | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
 Nvir | 2 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 61 |
 (Hhal + Nvir) | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
 (Clec + Rpro) + (Hhal + Nvir) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
 Nlug | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
 Total | 10 | 9 | 208 | 146 | 52 | 235 | 624 |