Peer Review reports
From: Assessing the relative performance of fast molecular dating methods for phylogenomic data
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 10 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 25 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 15 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Beatriz Mello |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 1 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Beatriz Mello |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Beatriz Mello |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 5 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 17 Nov 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Beatriz Mello |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Nov 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Nov 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Dec 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12864-022-09030-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.