Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Analysis of codon usage patterns in 48 Aconitum species

Original Submission
18 Nov 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
29 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
19 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 4
21 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
13 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
23 Aug 2023 Author responded Author comments - Conglong Xia
Resubmission - Version 8
23 Aug 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
25 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
5 Sep 2023 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12864-023-09650-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page