Peer Review reports
From: A comparison of Oxford nanopore library strategies for bacterial genomics
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Jun 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Jun 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jul 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jul 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 5 Sep 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Sauvage |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Sep 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Sauvage |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Oct 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Oct 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Oct 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Oct 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12864-023-09729-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.