Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of discrepancies between beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and narwhal (Monodon monoceros) reference genomes. For beluga, assemblies were compared to Dl5, as this was the most contiguous; for narwhal, the assembly of Damas et al. [1] was compared to Mm3. Discrepancies as a percentage of the total evaluated reference genome are presented in parentheses

From: Contrasting new and available reference genomes to highlight uncertainties in assemblies and areas for future improvement: an example with monodontid species

Assembly

Debris

Translocations

Inversions

Relocations

Unassessed

Congruent

Delphinapterus leucas

 DlJones

7,096,636a (0.3)

31,779,574 (1.35)

29,465,224 (1.25)

18,044,276 (0.8)

109,570,873 (4.6)

2,166,825,960 (91.7)

 Dlzoo

11,212,633 (0.5)

14,447,594 (0.6)

23,928,201 (1.0)

1,165,563 (0.1)

116,520,692 (4.9)

2,189,291,240(92.9)

 Dl3

13,985,070 (0.6)

4,419,089 (0.1)

43,013,607 (1.8)

1,546,419 (0.1)

274,690,520(11.4)

2,068,226,002(86.0)

 Dl4

10,800,991 (0.4)

1,403,102 (0.1)

40,843,164 (1.7)

1,899,502 (0.1)

191,862,255 (9.2)

2,122,477,807(88.5)

Monodon monoceros

 MmDamas

59,103,779 (2.5)

909,121 (0.05)

124,283,977 (5.3)

7,848,688 (0.35)

115,575,344 (4.9)

2,034,233,699 (86.9)

  1. aOnly includes debris from reference Dl5 as Jones et al. [22] v3 was not assembled into chromosomes using Hi-C data