Table 3 ACVR2A rs3764955 association analysis for athlees stratified by performance and compared with controls

Model

Controls n (%)

All high-elite n (%)

OR

95% CI lower

95% CI upper

p-value adjusted

Codominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

29 (56.9)

1

0.20784

 CG

179 (49)

17 (33.3)

0.52

0.27

0.98

 CC

28 (7.7)

5 (9.8)

0.97

0.35

2.73

Dominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

29 (56.9)

1

0.13736

 CG - CC

207 (56.7)

22 (43.1)

0.58

0.32

1.05

Recessive

 GG - CG

337 (92.3)

46 (90.2)

1

1

 CC

28 (7.7)

5 (9.8)

1.31

0.48

3.56

Overdominant

 GG - CC

186 (51)

34 (66.7)

1

0.06678

 CG

179 (49)

17 (33.3)

0.52

0.28

0.96

Model

Controls n (%)

All elite n (%)

OR

95% CI lower

95% CI upper

p-value adjusted

Codominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

76 (50.7)

1

0.11374

 CG

179 (49)

57 (38)

0.66

0.44

0.99

 CC

28 (7.7)

17 (11.3)

1.26

0.65

2.45

Dominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

76 (50.7)

1

0.2539

 CG - CC

207 (56.7)

74 (49.3)

0.74

0.51

1.09

Recessive

 GG - CG

337 (92.3)

133 (88.7)

1

0.38214

 CC

28 (7.7)

17 (11.3)

1.54

0.82

2.9

Overdominant

 GG - CC

186 (51)

93 (62)

1

0.04352

 CG

179 (49)

57 (38)

0.64

0.43

0.94

Model

Controls n (%)

All subelite n (%)

OR

95% CI lower

95% CI upper

p-value adjusted

Codominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

52 (40.3)

1

0.39154

 CG

179 (49)

60 (46.5)

1.02

0.66

1.56

 CC

28 (7.7)

17 (13.2)

1.84

0.94

3.64

Dominant

 GG

158 (43.3)

52 (40.3)

1

1

 CG - CC

207 (56.7)

77 (59.7)

1.13

0.75

1.7

Recessive

 GG - CG

337 (92.3)

112 (86.8)

1

0.14244

 CC

28 (7.7)

17 (13.2)

1.83

0.96

3.46

Overdominant

 GG - CC

186 (51)

69 (53.5)

1

1

 CG

179 (49)

60 (46.5)

0.9

0.6

1.35