Open Access

Fate of the human Y chromosome linked genes and loci in prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and LNCaP

BMC Genomics201314:323

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-323

Received: 12 February 2013

Accepted: 7 May 2013

Published: 11 May 2013

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer is a known cause of mortality in men worldwide although the risk factor varies among different ethnic groups. Loss of the Y chromosome is a common chromosomal abnormality observed in the human prostate cancer.

Results

We screened 51 standard sequence tagged sites (STSs) corresponding to a male-specific region of the Y chromosome (MSY), sequenced the coding region of the SRY gene and assessed the status of the DYZ1 arrays in the human prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and LNCaP. The MSY was found to be intact and coding region of SRY showed no sequence variation in both the cell lines. However, DYZ1 arrays showed sequence and copy number variations. DU145 and LNCaP cells were found to carry 742 and 1945 copies of the DYZ1, respectively per 3.3 pg of genomic DNA. The DYZ1 copies detected in these cell lines are much below the average of that reported in normal human males. Similarly, the number of “TTCCA” repeat and its derivatives within the DYZ1 arrays showed variation compared to those of the normal males.

Conclusions

Clearly, the DYZ1 is maximally affected in both the cell lines. Work on additional cell lines and biopsied samples would augment our understanding about the susceptibility of this region. Based on the present work, we construe that copy number status of the DYZ1 may be exploited as a supplementary prognostic tool to monitor the occurrence of prostate cancer using biopsied samples.

Keywords

Prostate cancer DU145 LNCaP MSY STS DYZ1

Background

The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) is increasing worldwide though varies amongst different ethnic groups [1]. It is a common malignancy affecting global population of men and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of this cancer is highest in the Western countries and lowest in the Asian countries [2]. Despite its high prevalence, very little is known about the molecular mechanism of its tumorigenesis.

Reports are there suggesting the involvement of chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10,12, 13, 17,18, 20, X and the Y encompassing several genetically susceptible loci [3] though their precise roles still remain unclear. The advanced stage of PC shows complex chromosomal changes accumulated during the tumour progression [37]. Loss of the Y chromosome is a common chromosomal abnormality observed in the human PC [8] and this occurs only in neoplastic, but not in stromal cells [9]. Loss of genetic material may lead to the loss of putative tumour suppressor genes, which will ultimately lead to cancer. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that a normal human Y chromosome transferred to a Y chromosome lacking PC cell line PC3, suppressed its tumorigenic property [8]. Genetic predisposition of certain Y chromosomal haplogroups towards PC strongly suggests a positive correlation [1, 10, 11]. However, study conducted on Korean population showed lack of association between Y chromosomal haplogroups and PC [12]. The involvement of several Y linked genes and loci have been reported to be associated with the progression of PC [13, 14]. The male sex determining gene SRY is down regulated in PC and is a negative regulator of the androgen receptor [15]. SRY does not express in any adult male tissue except the adult testis. However, SRY is expressed in DU145 [16], androgen untreated LNCaP cells [13] and prostate adenocarcinoma cell lines. Thus, SRY gene seems to play an important role for the development and progression of PC.

The human Y chromosome is male specific, constitutively haploid, passed on from father to son and largely escapes meiotic recombination. Approximately, 95% (60 Mb) of the human Y chromosome represents non recombining region of Y (NRY), also known as MSY. Similarly, 5% (3 Mb) of the Y-chromosome is composed of pseudo-autosomal region (PAR) necessary for the pairing with the sex chromosomes. There are 1287 MSY specific STS markers encompassing the human Y chromosome with an average spacing of 14 Kb spanning over 1698 loci [17]. Deletion mapping based on the STSs has advanced our understanding of the Y chromosome structure and functions. Previous studies were mostly conducted on three commercially available PC cell lines LNCaP, PC3 and DU145 using chromosome banding techniques [18], Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [19], Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) [20], and Spectral karyotyping (SKY) [21, 22]. However, none of these techniques provided evidence towards the involvement of Y chromosome linked genes and loci. In the present study, we studied DU145 (originated from the metastatic site brain of a 69 years old Caucasian male) and LNCaP (originated from the metastatic site left supraclavicular lymph node of a 50 years old Caucasian male) cell lines using 51 STSs specific to MSY. DU145 is Hypotriploid having both 61 and 62 chromosomes with highest rate of occurrence and carries single Y per cell. The Y chromosome of DU145 carries a translocated part of chromosome 20 [3]. LNCaP is hypotetraploid having 84 chromosomes occurring in 22% of the cells [23] and carries 2 Y chromosomes per cell [3].

Approximately, 20% of the human Y chromosome harbours DYZ1 satellite sequence [24]. DYZ1 was identified as 3.4 Kb band generated on HaeIII digestion of the human male genomic DNA [25]. A normal human Y chromosome contains approximately 4000–4300 copies of the DYZ1 arrays [26]. Since DYZ1 copies do not participate in recombination, it was deduced to have no functional or evolutionary advantage [27]. However, this is now reported to play a crucial role in chromatin folding and maintenance of the structural integrity of the Y chromosome [26].

With this background, we studied status of several Y linked genes and loci and assessed copy number variation of DYZ1 arrays using real time PCR in DU145 and LNCaP cell lines. In addition, we sequenced the 3564 bp unit of DYZ1 array and the coding region of SRY gene from these cell lines.

Results

Status of the MSY region in DU145

The genomic DNA from DU145 and LNCaP was screened for the presence or absence of 51 STSs specific to MSY (Figure 1 and Table 1). These STSs in both the cell lines were found to be intact.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the human Y chromosome showing MSY region and positions of 51 STSs screened in DU145 and LNCaP cells. Single copy genes, gene families and their corresponding STSs are shown on the vertical lines adjacent to the diagram of Y chromosome. The vertical line on the right most side of the picture is showing presence of all the 51 STSs studied.

Table 1

List of STSs analyzed to ascertain the genetic integrity of the Y-chromosome in the prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and LNCaP

Serial No.

STS Identifier

Location

Multi-Copy

STS Status in DU145

STS status in LNCaP

1

sY14

SRY exon 1

 

+

+

2

sY1240

PCDH11Y intron 3

 

+

+

3

sY276

AMELY exon 4/intron 4

 

+

+

4

sY1238

TBL1Y exon 11

 

+

+

5

sY637

PRKY 5’ upstream of gene

 

+

+

6

sY1319

PRKY 3’ UTR

 

+

+

7

sY1250

Proximal boundary of TSPY array

 

+

+

8

sY78

Alpha satellite (DYZ3) sequences in centromeric region

*

+

+

9

sY1251

Boundary between centromere and Yq

 

+

+

10

sY1317

USP9Y exon 3

 

+

+

11

sY1316

USP9Y exon 26

 

+

+

12

sY1234

DDX3Y (DBY) exon 9

 

+

+

13

sY1231

UTY exon 8

 

+

+

14

sY1235

XKRY exon 1

*

+

+

15

sY1260

CDY2 exon 1

*

+

+

16

sY1237

HSFY exon 2

*

+

+

17

sY121

Immediately distal to palindrome P4

 

+

+

18

sY1322

Between CYorf15A & CYorf15B

 

+

+

19

sY280

JARID1D (SMCY) exon 9/intron 9

 

+

+

20

sY1233

EIF1AY exon 1

 

+

+

21

sY1682

RPS4Y2 exon 1

 

+

+

22

sY627

RBMY1 exon 12

*

+

+

23

sY1258

Boundary between unique sequence u1 & blue amplicon b1 in AZFc

 

+

+

24

sY1161

PRY intron 2

*

+

+

25

sY1197

Internal boundary of Palindrome P3

 

+

+

26

sY1191

Unique sequence u3 in AZFc

 

+

+

27

sY1035

BPY2 intron 5

*

+

+

28

sY1318

DAZ exon 11

*

+

+

29

sY254

DAZ exon 3

*

+

+

30

sY1291

Red/gray boundary in AZFc

 

+

+

31

sY1125

Blue/gray boundary in AZFc

*

+

+

32

sY1054

Blue/yellow boundary in AZFc

*

+

+

33

sY1190

Yellow amplicon in AZFc

*

+

+

34

sY1263

CDY1 exon 1/intron 1

*

+

+

35

sY1206

Yellow/green boundaries in AZFc

*

+

+

36

sY1201

Distal boundary of gray amplicon in AZFc

 

+

+

37

sY1256

TSPY intron 5

*

+

+

38

sY1247

Boundary between PAR1 and MSY

 

+

+

39

sY1230

TMSB4Y exon 1/intron 1

 

+

+

40

sY1166

In MSY between distal Yq heterochromatin & PAR2

 

+

+

41

sY274

RPS4Y1 intron 4

 

+

+

42

sY1220

VCY exon 2

*

+

+

43

sY90

KALP intron 1

 

+

+

44

sY210

STSP intron 5

 

+

+

45

sY1254

TGIF2LY exon 1

 

+

+

46

sY1239

NLGN4Y exon 1

 

+

+

47

sY1273

Near boundary between MSY & PAR2

 

+

+

48

sY238

ZFY intron 2

 

+

+

49

sY1246

Proximal portion of distal Yq heterochromatin

 

+

+

50

sY142

Proximal to AZFc

 

+

+

51

sY160

Satellite-3 (DYZ1) sequences in distal Yq heterochromatin

*

+

+

Multi-copy STSs are indicated by star (*) and plus (+) sign denotes the presence of a particular STS.

HERV15 provirus sequence recombination

Human AZFa region contains HERV15 provirus A and B sequences and homologous recombination between these two regions accounts for most of the AZFa deletions [28]. The AZFa regions of DU145 and LNCaP Y chromosomes were found to remain intact showing the presence of USP9Y and DBY genes (Figure 2).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Deletion breakpoints mapping of AZFa region in DU145 and LNCaP based on STS analysis. Schematic diagram showing positions of proviruses A and B. Light and dark grey blocks are the regions of identical sequences in the proviruses A and B involved in recombination. 12 STSs specific to proviruses A and B are shown along with the corresponding positive controls.

Interstitial deletion mapping

There are known deletion patterns observed in different clinical conditions e.g. AZFa, P5- proximal P1, P5- distal P1, AZFc, gr/gr, b1/b2 and b2/b3 and TSPY-TSPY deletion [2936]. We have screened STSs encompassing these regions which were found to remain intact in DU145 of LNCaP cells (Figure 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

STS map showing common interstitial deletions of the human Y chromosome based on different studies conducted earlier. Plus sign and blank spaces denote the presence and absence of a particular STS, respectively. The corresponding references related to these studies are given on the right [see references [2936]. Last row shows the results of the present study denoted as PS.

DAZSNV analysis

The normal Y chromosome harbours four copies of DAZ gene [37]. The SNV analysis of DAZ was conducted using appropriate enzymes [38] to digest PCR products (Table 2). The DAZ region in DU145 and LNCaP showed presence of both alleles A and B for the SNVs (DAZ-SNV_I, DAZ-SNV_II, DAZ-SNV_III, DAZ-SNV_IV, DAZ-SNV_V, DAZ-SNV_VII, GOLY-SNV_1, TTTY4) screened. For DAZ-SNV_VI and BPY2, DU145 showed both the alleles A and B while LNCaP had only allele A (Table 2).
Table 2

Details of the SNVs studied for DAZ , GOLY , BPY2 and TTTY4 genes

Target

SNV

Oligos used

Accession no.

Product size

Enzyme for digestion

Restriction site

Fragments

Alleles

Present in copies

DU145

LNCaP

 

DAZ-SNV_I

SA 770 CACAGGCACTCAGTAACTATCTC

G73167

709

Fsp1

TGC/GCA

709

A

1,2,3 4

A&B

A&B

398 + 311

B

SA771CAGTGTTTCACCCACCACTTCTGGGT

 

DAZ-SNV_II

SA 446 GACATCCACGTCATTAACAAACG

G73166

182

Mbo1

/GATC

182

A

1 2,3,4

A&B

A&B

122 + 60

B

SA 447 GGAAGCTGCTTTGGTAGATAC

 

DAZ-SNV_III(sY586)

SA 772 GTGTGGCACATATGCCTATAAA

G63907

301

Taq1

T/CGA

301

A

2 1,3,4

A&B

A&B

184 + 117

B

SA 773 TTGGTACATCCAGATGCAGAT

DAZ gene

DAZ-SNV_IV

SA 774 CTTCCTCATCTTTCTTGACTT

G73168

630

AluI

AG/CT

630

A

2 1,3,4

A&B

A&B

398 + 262

B

SA 775 TTATTTATTCCTCAAAAAGGTG

 

DAZ-SNV_V (sY587)

SA 444 TGGTTAATAAAGGGAAGGTGTTTT

G63908

244

DraI

TTT/AAA

195 + 49

A

3,4 1,2

A&B

A&B

122 + 73 + 49

B

SA 445 TCTCCAGGACAGGAAAATCC

 

DAZ-SNV_VI

SA 776 GGGCCTAGTCTCTAGATCATT

G73169

431

AflIII

A/CRYGT

431

A

1,2,3 4

A&B

A

248 + 183

B

SA 777 GCTAGAACCAAATATTCTGGAT

 

DAZ-SNV_VII (sY581)

SA 442 CACTGCCCTAATCCTAGCACA

G63906

252

Sau3AI

/GATC

189 + 63

A

1,4 2,3

A&B

A&B

130 + 63 + 59

B

SA 443 TCTTCTGGACATCCACGTCA

GOLY1

GOLY-SNV_1

SA768 TTGGCCTGTTGCTTCTAGGGTT

BV012733

531

HhaI

GCG/C

531

A

1 Copy

A&B

A&B

SA769 ACAGGGAGGGTGCTGTCACA

289 + 282

B

1 Copy

BPY2

BPY2

SA766 AAGCCCATTGCTGAGATACTG

BV012732

470

EcoRV

GAT/ATC

470

A

2 Copy

A&B

A

SA767 TTGTGATTCTGACCCAACGA

289 + 181

B

1 Copy

TTTY4

TTTY4

SA764 TGCAGACAGCACTGTGGCTT

BV012731

541

HaeIII

GG/CC

541

A

1 Copy

A&B

A&B

323 + 218

B

2 Copy

SA765 GTATATGGCATAATTTCACCTG

SRYgene sequence

We amplified 824 bp fragment of the SRY exon having 615 bp long coding fragment (Table 3B), cloned and sequenced. The sequences of the SRY gene in both DU145 and LNCaP were found to be intact (see Additional file 1).
Table 3

List of primers used for PCR amplification of DYZ1 array (A) and SRY gene (B)

(A)

Serial No.

Primer ID

Primer Sequence

Length (bp)

Location (DYZ1 array)

Orientation

1

SAS 1

CCATTCGAGACCGTAGCAAT

20

35-16 (5’ upstream to HaeIII site)

5’-3’

2

SAS 2

TTTCCTTTCGCTTGCATTCCAT

22

63-84

5’-3’

3

SAS 3

ATTTGATGCCATCCCATGAC

20

763-782

5’-3’

4

SAS 4

TTTTGAGTCCGTTCCATAACAC

22

1380-1401

5’-3’

5

SAS 5

TCCTTTGCCTTCCATTCG

18

1668-1685

5’-3’

6

SAS 6

TGCAGTCTTTTCCCTTCGAG

20

2564-2583

5’-3’

7

SAS 7

ATTGGATGGGATTGGAATGA

20

861-880

3’-5’

8

SAS 8

TGGATGGACTGCAATAGAAAG

22

1600-1621

3’-5’

9

SAS 9

TCGAATGGAAGGCAAAGG

18

1669-1686

3’-5’

10

SAS 10

CGACTGGTACGGACTCCAAT

20

2637-2656

3’-5’

11

SAS 11

GACTGGAAAGGCTGGGTGTCGA

22

3419-3440

3’-5’

12

SAS 12

TGGACAGCCTGGAATAAAGTG

21

3586-3606

3’-5’

(B)

1

SA 531

GAATCTGGTAGAAGTGAGTTTTGGA

25

61-85

5’-3’

2

SA 532

GCCTTTATTAGCCAGAGAAAAGAAA

25

860-884

3’-5’

Status of the DYZ1 array

For ascertaining structural status of the DYZ1 array, 6 sets of primers were designed (Table 3A) to amplify 19 fragments (Table 4) from a single 3.56 kb array of DYZ1 (Figure 4). The analysis of all the 19 combinations showed intact DYZ1 arrays both in DU145 and LNCaP.
Table 4

List of DYZ 1 primer combinations used for end point PCR, their corresponding amplicon sizes and reaction conditions

Serial No.

DYZ1, Primer Combinations

Amplicon Size (bp)

PCR conditions (Annealing and Extension)

1

SAS (1&7)

915

64°C-1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

2

SAS (1&8)

1656

65°C −1.0’, 72°C −2.0’

3

SAS (1&9)

1721

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −2.0’

4

SAS (2&7)

818

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

5

SAS (2&8)

1559

60-°C 1.0’, 72°C −1.5’

6

SAS (3&7)

118

55-°C 1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

7

SAS (3&8)

859

65°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

8

SAS (3&9)

924

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

9

SAS (3&10)

1894

64-°C 1.0’, 72°C −2.0’

10

SAS (4&8)

242

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

11

SAS (4&9)

307

55°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

12

SAS (4&10)

1277

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.5’

13

SAS (4&11)

2061

62°C −1.0’, 72°C −2.5’

14

SAS (4&12)

2192

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −2.5’

15

SAS (5&10)

989

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

16

SAS (5&12)

1904

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −2.0’

17

SAS (6&10)

93

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

18

SAS (6&11)

877

61°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

19

SAS (6&12)

1008

64°C −1.0’, 72°C −1.0’

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Diagrammatic illustration showing end point PCR for the amplification of different sub-fractions of the DYZ1 array in DU145 and LNCaP cells. A single array of DYZ1 is shown on top. Forward and reverse primers are shown above and below the bars. Similarly, amplification products and their corresponding sizes are shown below. The fragments highlighted (dark bar) were used for subsequent cloning and sequencing analysis.

Copy number calculation of DYZ1 using real time PCR

We calculated DYZ1 copy number in DU145 and LNCaP by Real Time PCR using SYBR green chemistry employing absolute quantification method and a standard curve of cloned DYZ1 plasmid using ten-fold dilutions starting with 20 crore (2x108) copies. The amplification plot, dissociation curve and standard curve are given in Figure 5A, B, and C, respectively. Figure 5D represents the number of DYZ1 copies. DU145 contains 742 copies, while LNCaP contains 1945 copies per 3.3 pg of genomic DNA.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

DYZ1 sequence showing insertion and deletion. Partial aligned DYZ1 sequence from DU145 and LNCaP showing insertion and deletion compared to that of the reference sequence AC068123.5.

3564 bp array sequence of DYZ1

Four PCR amplified fragments (Figure 4, dark bar) were cloned and sequenced. Sequencing results showed insertion, deletion and several point mutations. Compared to normal sequences of the DYZ1, the number of highly abundant “TTCCA” repeats [25] and its derivatives per 3564 bp (HaeIII fragment) were found to be different amongst normal, DU145 and LNCaP cells (Table 5 and Additional file 2). The DYZ1 sequences from both DU145 and LNCaP cells were aligned with the reference sequence from NCBI database (Accession no. AC068123.5, Gene ID- 100499443) using ClustalW software (see Additional file 3). Between DU145 and the reference sequence; 23 point mutations, between DU145 and LNCaP; 11 point mutations and between LNCaP and the reference sequence; 27 point mutations were detected. Compared to the reference DYZ1 sequence, DU145 showed Insertion of 16 bp in between the position of 1654- and 1655 bp, deletions of 1 bp at position 792 bp and 15 bp between 2606–2622 position, respectively. LNCaP showed insertion of 15 bp between 1654- 1655 bp position and deletion of 114 bp between 2541–2657 bp. The regions showing major deletions are given in Figure 6 (For complete details, please see Additional file 3). A comparison of LNCaP with DU145 showed a net deletion of 99 bp in LNCaP. Upon virtual restriction mapping of 3.56 Kb unit of DYZ1 using Restriction Mapper version 3 software, loss and gain of several restriction sites were detected (Table 6). Compared to the reference sequence, a total of 6 restriction enzyme sites (BsaBI, NlaIV, BamHI, EcoRII, XhoII and CspCI) were lost and Eco57I site was gained in DU145. Similarly, a total 8 restriction enzyme sites (BsaBI, NlaIV, BamHI, EcoRII, XhoII, CspCI, MaeII and MaeIII) were lost and Eco57I site was gained in LNCaP. Thus, one Eco57I site was gained in both the cell lines. Differences in the restriction site frequency were compared amongst DU145, LNCaP and the reference sequence (Table 6). The result showed DYZ1 arrays are uniquely affected in each category of cells.
Table 5

Occurrence of “TTCCA” repeats and its derivatives with single or multiple base alterations per 3564 array of DYZ1 in DU145 and LNCaP with the reference sequence AC068123.5

Serial No.

Repeat unit and derivatives

Number of TTCCA repeat units and its derivatives per 3564 bp HaeIII unit of DYZ1array

AC068123.5

DU145

LNCaP

1

Actual Size (bp)

3564

3564

3465

2

TTCCA

229

235

228

3

1 bp derivatives

292

289

282

4

ATCCA

11

9

9

5

TACCA

3

3

2

6

TTACA

14

13

15

7

TTCAA

21

22

22

8

TTTCA

19

19

19

9

TTCTA

25

25

25

10

TTCCT

32

33

33

11

GTCCA

27

31

28

12

TGCCA

9

10

10

13

TTGCA

25

22

22

14

TTCGA

60

60

57

15

TTCCG

18

17

16

16

CTCCA

14

14

14

17

TCCCA

6

4

4

18

TTCCC

8

7

6

19

2 bp derivatives

142

142

139

20

3 bp derivatives

37

33

30

21

4 bp derivatives

9

9

10

22

5 bp derivatives

1

1

1

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Copy number estimation of DYZ1 in DU145 and LNCaP. (A) represents the amplification plot, (B), the corresponding dissociation curve (C), the standard plot and (D) shows the number of DYZ1 copies in DU145 and LNCaP.

Table 6

Restriction mapping of 3.56 Kb DYZ1 sequence from DU145, LNCaP and the reference sequence AC068123.5 by virtual digest using Restriction Mapper Version 3 software

Serial No.

Restriction enzyme

Sequence

Sight Length

Overhung

Frequency of cut sites

AC068123.5

DU145

LNCaP

1

BsaBI

GATNNNNATC

6

blunt

1

0

0

2

Cac8I

GCNNGC

4

blunt

1

1

1

3

NlaIV

GGNNCC

4

blunt

1

0

0

4

BamHI

GGATCC

6

5’

1

0

0

5

BseYI

CCCAGC

6

5’

1

1

1

6

Bsp1407I

TGTACA

6

5’

1

1

1

7

BspHI

TCATGA

6

5’

1

1

1

8

ClaI

ATCGAT

6

5’

1

1

1

9

DdeI

CTNAG

4

5’

1

1

1

10

EcoRI

GAATTC

6

5’

1

1

1

11

EcoRII

CCWGG

5

5’

1

0

0

12

MaeII

ACGT

4

5’

1

1

0

13

MaeIII

GTNAC

4

5’

1

1

0

14

VspI

ATTAAT

6

5’

1

1

1

15

XhoII

RGATCY

6

5’

1

0

0

16

BseMII

CTCAG

5

3’

1

1

1

17

BsgI

GTGCAG

6

3’

1

1

1

18

BtsI

GCAGTG

6

3’

1

1

1

19

Eco57I

CTGAAG

6

3’

0

1

1

20

Eco57MI

CTGRAG

6

3’

1

2

2

21

GsuI

CTGGAG

6

3’

1

1

1

22

Hpy188I

TCNGA

4

3’

1

1

1

23

MnlI

CCTC

4

3’

1

1

1

24

PflMI

CCANNNNNTGG

6

3’

1

1

1

25

SduI

GDGCHC

6

3’

1

1

1

26

ScrFI

CCNGG

4

5’

2

1

1

27

ArsI

GACNNNNNNTTYG

7

3’

2

2

2

28

BdaI

TGANNNNNNTCA

6

3’

2

2

2

29

CspCI

CAANNNNNGTGG

7

3’

2

0

0

30

TspRI

CASTG

5

3’

2

2

2

31

DpnI

GATC

4

blunt

3

2

2

32

ApoI

RAATTY

6

5’

3

3

3

33

AsuII

TTCGAA

6

5’

3

3

3

34

Eco31I

GGTCTC

6

5’

3

2

2

35

MaeI

CTAG

4

5’

3

3

4

36

MboI

GATC

4

5’

3

2

2

37

SfaNI

GCATC

5

5’

3

4

4

38

TatI

WGTACW

6

5’

3

3

3

39

SetI

ASST

4

3’

3

3

1

40

CviJI

RGCY

4

blunt

4

4

4

41

MslI

CAYNNNNRTG

6

blunt

4

4

4

42

FokI

GGATG

5

5’

4

2

2

43

AlfI

GCANNNNNNTGC

6

3’

4

4

4

44

RsaI

GTAC

4

blunt

5

5

4

45

BccI

CCATC

5

5’

5

3

4

46

BsmAI

GTCTC

5

5’

5

5

4

47

MseI

TTAA

4

5’

5

6

6

48

BstXI

CCANNNNNNTGG

6

3’

5

5

4

49

MboII

GAAGA

5

3’

5

3

3

50

XmnI

GAANNNNTTC

6

blunt

6

6

6

51

TstI

CACNNNNNNTCC

6

3’

6

4

4

52

NlaIII

CATG

4

3’

7

7

7

53

BcgI

CGANNNNNNTGC

6

3’

16

14

14

54

BsrDI

GCAATG

6

3’

16

14

14

55

BsrI

ACTGG

5

3’

17

19

18

56

TspGWI

ACGGA

5

3’

20

23

17

57

AgsI

TTSAA

5

3’

22

20

23

58

BsmI

GAATGC

6

3’

22

23

21

59

FaiI

YATR

4

blunt

23

25

23

60

PleI

GAGTC

5

5’

23

21

21

61

TspDTI

ATGAA

5

3’

25

24

24

62

TspEI

AATT

4

5’

35

35

35

63

TfiI

GAWTC

5

5’

52

51

51

64

TaqI

TCGA

4

5’

66

62

62

65

HinfI

GANTC

4

5’

75

72

72

The loss or gains of the restriction sites with respect to the reference sequence are highlighted in bold.

FISH analysis

The prostate cells DU145 might have encountered many changes including translocation of the part of 20th chromosome to the Y chromosome. The DU145 Y chromosome was found to harbour only 742 copies of DYZ1 which is far less than that in a normal Y chromosome. The DYZ1 constitutes approximately 20% of the normal human Y chromosome needed for the maintenance of its structural and functional integrities. A decrease in the number of arrays seems to threaten the survival of Y chromosome in DU145 cell. To ascertain the presence or the absence of Y chromosome in DU145 cells, we conducted FISH experiment using a labelled DYZ1 probe. Approximately, 400 nuclei and metaphases were screened. To rule out the possibility of experimental error, as a positive control, the metaphases from the normal human male were hybridized with DYZ1 probe. Several nuclei and metaphases in DU145 were found to be devoid of DYZ1 fluorescence signals. This way, approximately, 48% of DU145 cells were found to have no Y chromosome (Figure 7).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2164-14-323/MediaObjects/12864_2013_Article_5011_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Localization of DYZ1 in DU145 cells by FISH. DAPI (4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) stained metaphases and interphase nuclei are shown having green signal of DYZ1. Nuclei and metaphases lacking DYZ1 are indicated by red arrow. Note the variation in the DYZ1 signal intensities across nuclei reflecting copy number variation.

Discussion

DU145 and LNCaP cells originated from prostate tumours. Despite involvement of several chromosomes in the etiology of PC, our focus remained on the Y chromosome of the two cell lines to assess several Y linked genes and DYZ1 regions. Sequences of the SRY gene were found to be normal in both the cells. Previous studies conducted on PC cell lines employed conventional G-banding, FISH, CGH and SKY approaches. However, these techniques owing to innate limitations, do not detect microdeletions. Despite 51 STSs encompassing AZFa, AZFb and AZFc screened in this study, no microdeletions were detected suggesting that MSY remained intact in both the cell lines.

In an earlier report, Y chromosome was excluded from the CGH analysis because of the presence of a large heterochromatic region [39]. In this study, we particularly focused on the heterochromatic region DYZ1 and assessed not only its copy number variation but also indels all along the length of the array. We detected 742 copies in DU145 and that of 1945 in LNCaP cells. Significant difference in the copy number of DYZ1 between DU145 and LNCaP could be due to the unequal number of Y chromosome(s) per cell. It may be noted that DU145 carries single Y chromosome per cell coupled with a major translocation of part of 20th chromosome to the Y chromosome, whereas LNCaP carries 2 Y chromosomes per cell [3]. In an earlier study on the biopsied samples of PC, we detected 550 copies of the DYZ1 [26] which is in accordance with our present study.

Though MSY was intact in DU145 and LNCaP cells but DYZ1 was clearly affected showing insertion, deletion, frequent point mutations and copy number variations. These mutational events, not only shifts the frame of abundant “TTCCA” repeats but also generate its derivatives leading to the shrinkage or expansion of the same. The insertion and deletion of 16 bp kept the frame unchanged and maintained the original length of array of 3564 bp in DU145. Due to insertion of 15 bp and deletion of 114 bp, the LNCaP cells showed net loss of 99 bp in the array of 3564 bp (Additional file 3). A normal array of 3564 bp harbours approximately 80 different restriction enzyme recognition sites [25]. We detected more loss of restriction sites in both the cell lines than that of their gains. Startlingly, a single Eco57I site was gained in both the cell types though its biological significance remained unclear. These results clearly suggest that DYZ1 is indeed affected during the process of cells becoming cancerous. Despite these changes, Y chromosome survived in about 58% of DU145 cells (Figure 7). Most likely, such DU145 cells have managed to retain the critical number of the DYZ1 copies with near normal sequences needed for the sustenance of the Y chromosome.

The African-American men have been found to show highest and Japanese, the lowest incidences of PC in the world [4042]. This suggests that males from different ethnicity and geographical regions may be different with respect to their susceptibility to develop prostate cancer. It may be noted that status of DYZ1 was not assessed in the males from either of these populations. Based on our study, we presume that besides susceptibility to PC, males from different ethnic and geographical regions may show sequence and copy number variations in the DYZ1 arrays. However, this warrants a detailed analysis of sufficient number of PC males before a conclusion can be drawn. When, once this issue is fully resolved, DYZ1 may be added amongst the list of possible bio-marker for DNA based diagnosis using PC biopsied samples.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that, MSY region and SRY gene both remain intact in DU145 and LNCaP PC cell lines. Since, DYZ1 region is maximally affected both in terms of sequence and array’s copy number; this may be exploited as possible bio-marker for DNA based diagnosis of PC together with other marker systems.

Methods

Cell culture and DNA isolation

DU145 and LNCaP cell lines were available with National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, respectively in connection with other projects. Institute and University procured this cell lines from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA). DU145 cells were cultured in T75 flasks containing 10% DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, Life Technologies, Gibco, USA). LNCaP cells were cultured in T75 flask containing 10% RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gibco, USA). Cultures were supplemented with 1% antibiotic and antimycotic solution.

DNA from cultured cells was isolated using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany). Quality of isolated DNA was checked by electrophoresis using 1% agarose gel and concentration was measured spectrophotometrically.

Sequence Tagged Site (STS) mapping of MSY region

MSY region was analysed for micro-deletions using STS end point PCR reactions. A total of 51 STSs were selected from the MSY breakpoint mapper for screening this region. The end point PCR reactions were performed in 20 μl reaction volumes containing 5X Green Go Taq reaction buffer (Promega, Madison, USA), 200 μM dNTPs (Biotools, Spain), 1 IU Go Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA) and 100 ng of genomic DNA. STS PCR primers were procured from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. STS screening was performed following the PCR conditions available in MSY Breakpoint Mapper database [17]. β-actin (Forward primer- 5’ AGATGACCCAGATCATGTTTGAGA 3’ and Reverse primer- 5’ CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGC) and sY14 (Additional file 4) primers were used as control for assessing the quality of genomic DNA. Genomic DNA from normal males were used as positive controls. Female genomic DNA and a reaction without template were used as negative controls. The amplified products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV illumination.

Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) analysis

The AZFc region of MSY was analyzed for 7 SNVs in the DAZ region and one SNV for GOLY1, BPY2 and TTTY4 by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The details of primer sequences, accession numbers, product sizes and restriction enzymes used for SNV analysis are given in the Table 2. SNV PCR reactions were performed in 40 μl following standard PCR conditions. The amplified PCR product was precipitated by addition of 4 μl of 3 M sodium acetate and 120 μl of absolute ethanol and incubated at -70°C for 4 hours. DNA was pelleted down at 13,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C, washed in 70% ethanol, dried and dissolved in 10 μl water. The purified PCR products were further subjected to restriction digestion using appropriate restriction enzymes and buffer. The digested fragments were resolved on 2.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV illumination.

Cloning and sequencing of SRYand DYZ1 array

Pfu DNA polymerase (Biotools, Spain) amplified amplicons were resolved on 1.5% agarose gel, sliced and eluted using gel extraction kit (Fermentas, Thermo Fischer Scientific). Eluted DNA was cloned in pGEM®-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, USA). 4 recombinant clones for each fragment were sequenced on Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer using ABI PRISM® BigDye® terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Life Technologies, California, USA). For cycle sequencing, PCR reactions were set as 96°C for 1 minute, followed by 25 cycles each consisting of 96°C for 10 seconds, 50°C for 5 seconds, and 60°C for 4 minutes. After PCR, extension products were purified using ethanol–sodium acetate precipitation method followed by washing in 70% ethanol. Hi-Di™ Formamide (Life Technologies, California, USA) was added, samples were heat denatured, chilled on ice and loaded on ABI 3130xl genetic analyzer. Sequencing was performed using Run 3130xl Data Collection software v3.0, sequences were retrieved using Sequencing Analysis 5.3.1 and sequence analysis was done using Gene runner software.

Analysis of DYZ1 array

The intactness of DYZ1 array was assessed using end point PCR. The details of primers, their combinations and PCR conditions are listed in the Table 4. Copy number of DYZ1 was calculated based on absolute quantification method using qPCR. DNA was used as template and SYBR green (Life Technologies, California, USA) was used as detection dye. The qPCR reactions were performed on Sequence Detection System 7500 (Life Technologies, California, USA). 10 fold dilutions of recombinant plasmid containing ~3.56 Kb HaeIII fragment of DYZ1 array were used to generate standard curve starting with 2 X 108 copies. All the reactions were carried out in triplicates using three different concentrations of the template DNA from DU145 and LNCaP cells. The standard curve had a slope of −3.32 and R2 value of >0.99. Copies of the DYZ1 array were calculated by extrapolation of the standard curve obtained with known copies of the recombinant plasmid.

Florescence in-situhybridization (FISH)

DU145 cells cultured in 10% DMEM were used for metaphase chromosome preparation. These cells were grown for 70 hours in 5% CO2 environment at 37°C and then treated with colcemid (3 μg/ml). Treated cells were again incubated for 2 hours in 5% CO2 environment at 37°C. After 72 hours, cells were centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT). Harvested cells were resuspended in 0.075 M KCl and incubated at RT for 20 minutes in 5% CO2 environment at 37°C. Then added 1 drop of fixative solution (3:1, methanol: glacial acetic acid) and centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 10 minutes at RT. Discarded the supernatant, resuspended the cell pellet in 10 ml fresh fixative solution and incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C. Then centrifuged cells at 1800 rpm for 10 minutes at RT. Repeated the washing step 2 times. Finally, cells were resuspended in fresh 1 ml fixative and stored at -20°C.

For metaphase chromosome preparation, 20 μl of nuclei suspension in fixative was spread on the glass slides. Before proceeding further, slides were kept for 1 week at 37°C for ageing. Slides were then incubated in 70% glacial acetic acid for 2 minutes followed by dehydration in 70%, 90% and 100% ethanol for 2 minutes each at RT. Air dried the glass slides and incubated in a solution containing 0.1 mg/ml and 0.01 N HCl for 20 minutes. Fixed the metaphase preparation in 4% paraformaldehyde (prepared in 1X PBS, pH 7.4) for 5 minutes at RT. Slides were then washed in 1.0 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.4) followed by 2 washes in 1X phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 5 minutes each at RT. Further, incubated in 0.5% Triton-X-100 (prepared in 1X PBS) for 10 minutes followed by 3 washes in 1X PBS for 5 minutes each. Slides were then incubated in 0.1 N HCl for 10 minutes followed by 3 washes in 1X PBS for 5 minutes each and stored in 2X SSC (pH 7.4) overnight at 4°C until used for hybridization. FISH was conducted with a labelled clone containing 3.56 kb sequence of DYZ1. Labelling was done with biotin-dUTP using a Nick translation kit from Vysis (Illinois, USA). Hybridization, washing, counterstaining and mounting of the slides were conducted following standard protocols [43]. The slides were screened under the Olympus fluorescence microscope (BX 51) fitted with vertical fluorescence illuminator U-LH100HG UV, excitation and barrier filters and images were captured with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera. Captured images were analyzed using CytoVision software version 3.93 from Applied Imaging Systems.

Abbreviations

PC: 

Prostate cancer

STS: 

Sequence tagged site

NRY: 

Non recombining region of Y

MSY: 

Male specific region of Y

FISH: 

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

CGH: 

Comparative genomic hybridization

SKY: 

Spectral karyotyping

SNV: 

Single nucleotide variants

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

UV: 

Ultraviolet

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

qPCR: 

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India Grant - BT/PR11805/MED/12/424/2009 and BT/PR14102/AAQ/01/438/2010 to SA and a core grant from DBT, New Delhi to the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi. SA is also grateful to Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, Government of India, for J. C. Bose National Fellowship. The authors also acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for its financial assistance to SKY and AK as Senior Research Fellow (SRF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection; analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript or decision to publish. We thank Dhanya, Abhinaya T. Sundari and Shri Khem Singh Negi for their technical assistance. Equipment donation from the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany is gratefully acknowledged. Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding submitted manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology

References

  1. Ewis AA, Lee J, Naroda T, Sano T, Kagawa S, Iwamoto T, Shinohara Y, Ishikawa M, Baba Y, Nakahori Y, Shinka: Prostate cancer incidence varies among males from different Y-chromosome lineages. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2006, 9 (3): 303-309. 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500876.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J: Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1990, 80 (6): 827-841.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pan Y, Kytölä S, Farnebo F, Wang N, Lui WO, Nupponen N, Isola J, Visakorpi T, Bergerhein USR, Larsson C: Characterization of chromosomal abnormalities in prostate cancer cell lines by Spectral Karyotyping. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999, 87 (3–4): 225-232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tribukait B: DNA flow cytometry in carcinoma of the prostate for diagnosis, prognosis and study of tumour biology. Acta Oncol. 1991, 30 (2): 187-192. 10.3109/02841869109092348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Visakorpi T, Kylmala T, Tainio H, Hoivula T, Tammela T, Isola J: High cell proliferation activity determined by DNA flow cytometry predicts poor prognosis after relapse in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1994, 30A (1): 129-130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Isaacs WB: Molecular Genetics of prostate cancer. Cancer Surv. 1995, 25: 357-379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kallioniemi OP, Visakorpi T: Genetic basis and clonal evolution of human prostate cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 1996, 68: 225-255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vijaykumar S, Gracia D, Hensel DH, Banerjee M, Bracht T, Xianq R, Kaqan J, Naylor SL: The human Y chromosome suppresses the tumorigenicity of PC-3, a human prostate cancer cell line in Athymic Nude Mice. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005, 44 (4): 365-372. 10.1002/gcc.20250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Van DH, Alers J: Loss of chromosome Y in prostatic Cancer cells but not in stromal tissues. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1993, 66 (2): 131-132. 10.1016/0165-4608(93)90244-G.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ewis AA, Lee J, Naroda J, Sasahara K, Sano T, Kagawa S, Iwamoto T, Nakahori Y: Prostate cancer incidence and different alleles of the human Y-linked tetranucleotide polymorphism DYS 19. J Med Invest. 2002, 49 (1–2): 56-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paracchini C, Pearce CL, Kolonel LN, Altshuler D, Henderson BE: A Y chromosomal influence on prostate cancer risk: the multi-ethnic cohort study. J Med Genet. 2003, 40 (11): 815-819. 10.1136/jmg.40.11.815.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim W, Yoo TK, Kim SJ, Shin DJ, Tyler-Smith C, Jin HJ, Kwak KD, Kim ET, Bae YS: Lack of association between Y-chrmosomal haplogroups and prostate cancer in the Korean population. PLoS One. 2007, 2 (1): e172-10.1371/journal.pone.0000172.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lau YFC, Zhang J: Expression analysis of thirty one Y chromosome genes in human prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2000, 27 (4): 308-321. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(200004)27:4<308::AID-MC9>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dasari VK, Goharderakhshan RZ, Perinchery G, Li LC, Tanaka Y, Alonzo J, Dahiya R: Expression analysis of Y chromosome genes in human prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001, 165 (4): 1335-1341. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69895-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yuan X, Lu ML, Li T, Balk SP: SRY interacts with and negatively regulates androgen receptor transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (49): 46647-4654. 10.1074/jbc.M108404200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tricoli JV, Yao JL, D’souza SA, Bracken RB: Detection of sex-region Y (SRY) transcripts in human prostate adenocarcinoma and benign prostatic hypertrophy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1993, 8 (1): 28-33. 10.1002/gcc.2870080106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lange J, Skaletsky H, Bell GW, Page DC: MSY breakpoint mapper, a database of sequence-tagger sites useful in defining naturally occurring deletions in the human Y chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D809-D814.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Konig JJ, Teubel W, Kamst E, Romijn JC, Schroder FH, Hagemeijer A: Cytogenetic analysis of 39 prostate carcinomas and evaluation of short- term tissue culture techniques. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998, 101 (2): 116-122. 10.1016/S0165-4608(97)00224-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray J: Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitive, fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83 (9): 2934-2938. 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2934.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rotovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D: Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 1992, 258 (5083): 818-821. 10.1126/science.1359641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Speicher MR, Ballard SG, Ward DC: Karyotyping human chromosome by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat Genet. 1996, 12 (4): 368-375. 10.1038/ng0496-368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schrock E, du Manior S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith MA, Ning Y, Ledbetter DH, Bar-Am I, Soenksen D, Garini Y, Ried T: Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosome. Science. 1996, 273 (5274): 494-497. 10.1126/science.273.5274.494.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibas Z, Becher R, Kawinski E, Horoszewicz J, Sandyberg AA: A high resolution study of chromosome changes in a human prostatic carcinoma cell line (LNCaP). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1984, 11 (4): 399-404. 10.1016/0165-4608(84)90020-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ali S, Husnain SE: Genomics of the human Y-chromosome: association with male infertility. Gene. 2003, 4 (321): 25-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakahori Y, Mitani K, Yamada M, Nakgome Y: A human Y chromosome specific repeated DNA family (DYZ1) consists of a tandem array of pentanucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14 (19): 7569-7580. 10.1093/nar/14.19.7569.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pathak D, Premi S, Srivastava J, Chandy SP, Ali S: Genomic instability of the DYZ1 repeat in patients with Y chromosome anomalies and males exposed to Natural Background Radiation. DNA Res. 2006, 13 (3): 103-109. 10.1093/dnares/dsl002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lahn BT, Pearson NM, Jegalian K: The human Y chromosome in the light of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2 (3): 207-216. 10.1038/35056058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun C, Skaletsky H, Rozen S, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E, Oates R, Page DC: Deletion of the Azoospermia factor a (AZFa) region of human Y chromosome caused by recombination between HERV 15 proviruses. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9 (15): 2291-2296. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.hmg.a018920.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamp C, Hirschmann P, Voss H, Huellen K, Vogt PH: Two long homologous retroviral sequence blocks in proximal Yq11 cause AZFa microdeletions as a result of intrachromosomal recombination events. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9 (17): 2563-2572. 10.1093/hmg/9.17.2563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Blanco P, Shlumukova M, Sargent CA, Jobling MA, Affara N, Hurles ME: Divergent outcomes of intrachromosomal recombination on the human Y chromosome: male infertility and recurrent polymorphism. J Med Genet. 2000, 37 (10): 752-758. 10.1136/jmg.37.10.752.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Repping S, Skaletsky H, Lange J, Silber S, van der Veen F, Oates RD, Page DC, Rozen S: Recombination between palindromes P5 and P1 on the human Y chromosome causes massive deletions and spermatogenic failure. Am J Hum Genet. 2002, 71 (4): 906-922. 10.1086/342928.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Repping S, Skaletsky H, Brown L, van Daalen SK, Korver CM, Pyntikova T, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, de Vries JW, Oates RD, Silber S, van der Veen F, Page DC, Rozen S: Polymorphism for a 1.6-Mb deletion of the human Y chromosome persists through balance between recurrent mutation and haploid selection. Nat Genet. 2003, 35 (3): 247-251. 10.1038/ng1250.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Repping S, van Daalen SK, Korver CM, Brown LG, Marszalek JD, Geanotten J, Oates RD, Silber S, van der Veen F, Page DC, Rozen S: A family of human Y chromosomes has dispersed throughout northern Eurasia despite a 1.8-Mb deletion in the azoospermia factor c region. Genomics. 2004, 83 (6): 1046-1052. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.12.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Waterston RH, Wilson RK, Silber S, Oates R, Rozen S, Page DC: The AZFc region of the Y chromosome features massive palindromes and uniform recurrent deletions in infertile men. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (3): 279-286. 10.1038/ng757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fernandes S, Paracchini S, Meyer LH, Floridia G, Tyler- Smith C, Vogt PH: A large AZFc deletion removes DAZ3/DAZ4 and nearby genes from men in Y haplogroup N. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (1): 180-187. 10.1086/381132.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jobling MA, Lo IC, Turner DJ, Bowden GR, Lee AC, Xue Y, Carvalho-Silva D, Hurles ME, Adams SM, Chang YM, Kraaijenbrink T, Henke J, Guanti G, McKeown B, van Oorschot RA, Mitchell RJ, Tyler-Smith C, Parkin EJ, De knijff P: Structural variation on the short arm of the human Y chromosome: recurrent multigene deletions encompassing Amelogenin Y. Hum Mol Genet. 2007, 16 (3): 307-316.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Saxena R, de Vries JW, Repping S, Alagappan RK, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Ma P, Chen E, Hoovers JM, Page DC: Four DAZ genes in two clusters found in the AZFc region of the human Y chromosome. Genomics. 2000, 67 (3): 256-267. 10.1006/geno.2000.6260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fernandes S, Huellen K, Goncalves J, Dukal H, Zeisler J, Rajpert De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE, Habermann B, Krause W, Sousa M, Barros A, Vogt PH: High frequency of DAZ1/DAZ2 gene deletion in patients with severe oligozoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002, 8 (3): 286-298. 10.1093/molehr/8.3.286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nupponen NN, Hyytinen ER, Kallioniemi AH, Visakorpi T: Genetic alterations in prostate cancer cell lines detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998, 101 (1): 53-57. 10.1016/S0165-4608(97)00060-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. DeChello LM, Gregorio DI, Samociuk H: Race-specific geography of prostate cancer incidence. Int J Health Geogr. 2006, 5 (59): 2-6.Google Scholar
  41. Oishi K, Yoshida O, Schroeder FH: The geography of prostate cancer and its treatment in Japan. Cancer Surv. 1995, 23: 267-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sata F, Umemura T, Kishi R: The epidemiology of PC-recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2001, 28: 184-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahman MM, Bashamboo A, Prasad A, Pathak D, Ali S: Organizational variation of DYZ1 repeat sequences on the human Y chromosome and its diagnostic potential. DNA Cell Biol. 2004, 23 (9): 561-571. 10.1089/dna.2004.23.561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yadav et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.