Skip to main content

Post-transcriptional regulation in the myo1Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae



Saccharomyces cerevisiae myosin type II-deficient (myo1 Δ) strains remain viable and divide, despite the absence of a cytokinetic ring, by activation of the PKC1-dependent cell wall integrity pathway (CWIP). Since the myo1 Δ transcriptional fingerprint is a subset of the CWIP fingerprint, the myo1 Δ strain may provide a simplified paradigm for cell wall stress survival.


To explore the post-transcriptional regulation of the myo1 Δ stress response, 1,301 differentially regulated ribosome-bound mRNAs were identified by microarray analysis of which 204 were co-regulated by transcription and translation. Four categories of mRNA were significantly affected - protein biosynthesis, metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and unknown functions. Nine genes of the 20 CWIP fingerprint genes were post-transcriptionally regulated. Down and up regulation of selected ribosomal protein and cell wall biosynthesis mRNAs was validated by their distribution in polysomes from wild type and myo1Δ strains. Western blot analysis revealed accumulation of the phosphorylated form of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α-P) and a reduction in the steady state levels of the translation initiation factor eIF4Gp in myo1Δ strains. Deletion of GCN2 in myo1Δ abolished eIF2αp phosphorylation, and showed a severe growth defect. The presence of P-bodies in myo1Δ strains suggests that the process of mRNA sequestration is active, however, the three representative down regulated RP mRNAs, RPS8A, RPL3 and RPL7B were present at equivalent levels in Dcp2p-mCh-positive immunoprecipitated fractions from myo1Δ and wild type cells. These same RP mRNAs were also selectively co-precipitated with eIF2α-P in myo1Δ strains.


Quantitative analysis of ribosome-associated mRNAs and their polyribosome distributions suggests selective regulation of mRNA translation efficiency in myo1 Δ strains. Inhibition of translation initiation factor eIF2α (eIF2α-P) in these strains was by Gcn2p-dependent phosphorylation. The increase in the levels of eIF2α-P; the genetic interaction between GCN2 and MYO1; and the reduced levels of eIF4Gp suggest that other signaling pathways, in addition to the CWIP, may be important for myo1 Δ strain survival. Selective co-immunoprecipitation of RP mRNAs with eIF2α-P in myo1 Δ strains suggests a novel mode of translational regulation. These results indicate that post-transcriptional control is important in the myo1 Δ stress response and possibly other stresses in yeast.


Controlled regulation of gene expression is essential for maintaining the normal metabolic functions in living cells as well as for producing changes in cellular functions in response to life-threatening environmental and physiological stress. In yeast, the PKC1 cell wall integrity pathway (CWIP) represents one of the primary signaling pathways regulating gene expression in response to stress such as cell wall damage, heat shock, and disruption of polarized growth [14]. Its activation is marked by the accumulation of the hyperphosphorylated MAP kinase, Slt2p/Mpk1p. A gene transcription fingerprint for cell wall damage, which includes Slt2p, consists of 20 genes of different biological functions previously described by others [2, 5].

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae myosin type II heavy chain (Myo1p) is a protein required for normal cytokinesis in yeast. It was previously shown that hyperphosphorylated Slt2p accumulates in the deletion mutant of Myo1p (myo1Δ) [6] as well as in chs2 Δ [7], a related cytokinesis mutant strain in which chitin synthase 2, a protein important for primary septum formation, has been deleted [8]. Furthermore, the slt2Δ mutation was lethal in myo1Δ suggesting that its expression was required for survival [6]. However, when we examined the myo1Δ and chs2Δ strains for expression of the cell wall damage fingerprint, we found that despite morphological and biochemical phenotypes shared between myo1Δ and chs2Δ cytokinesis mutants, they expressed distinctively different cell wall damage fingerprints setting myo1Δ apart from the chs2Δ[7]. The myo1Δ strain therefore appears to have a unique mode of survival in response to stress and thus is an alternative model system for impaired cytokinesis and cell wall stress.

To further characterize how myo1Δ mounts its unique stress response, we previously described the global mRNA expression profile using microarray hybridization [6]. Knowing that the steady state levels of mRNA transcripts are a product of transcription rates and decay rates, and that mRNA levels are regulated at both the transcriptional and/or the post-transcriptional levels, we chose to study global gene regulation at these different levels to fully understand the complexity of genetic interactions that occur in response to the stress caused by the myo1Δ mutation.

Transcriptional regulation is traditionally the most studied because it represents the first level of regulation of genes and because technically speaking, it can be probed by widely accessible genome-wide mRNA expression profiling techniques [2, 57, 9, 10]. Post-transcriptional regulation including translation control and mRNA decay is also used by cells to modulate gene expression in a wide range of biological situations and is critical under conditions that require sudden and precise changes in protein levels including the cellular response to stress and apoptosis [1115]. For example, a global inhibition of protein synthesis has been reported under different types of stress including: entry into diauxic shift [13], ethanol exposure [14], oxidative [15] and osmotic stress [16]. Inhibition of protein synthesis prevents continued gene expression during potentially error-prone conditions and may accelerate the turnover of existing mRNAs [15]. In yeast, translational regulation occurs by several mechanisms, including decreased synthesis of rRNA, reduction in steady state levels of the translation initiation complex eIF4F (composed of eIF4Ep, eIF4Gp, and eIF4Ap) [17], and phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of the initiation factor eIF2 (eIF2αp, encoded by SUI2) [18, 19].

Yeast cells mount changes in gene expression that are coordinated with changes in the translatome in their response to different types of environmental stresses [9, 10]. This co-regulation of genes by transcription and translation has been demonstrated for genes that fall within functional categories of carbohydrate metabolism and energy production and is believed to be important for activating the environmental stress response (ESR) [10]. The extent of co-regulation can be correlated to the severity of the stress involved. Therefore, we examined both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms and their coordination in order to uncover potentially important stress response genes.

Cytoplasmic processing bodies or P-bodies are ribonucleoprotein aggregates that have been implicated in storage of mRNAs, translation repression, and mRNA degradation [20], another means of post-transcriptional regulation. P-bodies exist in yeast with similar function and protein composition to P-bodies in mammalian cells. For different stresses, a decrease in mRNA translation rate correlates with an increase in the formation of P-bodies, where non-translating mRNAs can be sequestered into these structures [20]. Dcp2p is a protein of the P-bodies found in yeast cells and has been used as a marker for in vivo localization studies [20, 21]. Therefore, we analyzed mRNA composition of Dcp2p-mCh-positive immunoprecipitated protein fractions in our myo1Δ strain to determine if these fractions were involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of the differentially expressed genes.

Here, we studied the relative abundance of translationally regulated genes by microarrays analysis. The regulated genes were then classified according to their biological functions. This analysis reiterated the importance of protein biosynthesis down regulation found before [6] and showed a significant number of ribosomal protein (RP) genes that were down regulated at the transcriptional level were also translationally repressed in the myo1Δ mutant. The polyribosome distribution of representative RP mRNAs supported the results from the DNA microarrays. The myo1Δ cells down regulated translation by Gcn2p-dependent phosphorylation of eIF2αp and reduced steady state levels of the translation initiation factor eIF4Gp, suggesting that the TOR pathway may be involved in the myo1Δ stress response in addition to the PKC1 cell wall integrity pathway. The conclusion of this study is that post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression is an important mechanism for cell survival under conditions of impaired cytokinesis and cell wall stress in the myo1Δ mutant.


Strains and Growth conditions

Experiments were performed using Saccharomyces cerevisiae wild type, myo1 Δ, gcn2 Δ, and myo1 Δgcn2 Δ, strains (Table 1). Cultures were grown overnight at 26°C between 0.5-0.8 OD600 in Complete Synthetic Media (CSM) supplemented with 2% glucose and 1× Nitrogen base, with continuous shaking at 200 rpm. Dr. Brian C. Rymond kindly provided a GCN2 null mutation strain. A myo1Δgcn2Δ double mutant was constructed by replacing the MYO1 gene with a HIS5 module by homologous recombination using a PCR- based method. This strain was transformed with a plasmid copy of MYO1+ (pRS316-MYO1+) to test for rescue of the double mutant phenotype. Colonies were confirmed by PCR analysis. For visualization of P-bodies structures by fluorescence microscopy, wild type and myo1 Δ strains were transformed using a Dcp2p-mCh (p1658) plasmid (kindly provided by Dr. Roy Parker) by the LiOAC method [22]. Microscopic examination was performed as previously described [23]. Briefly, live transformed cells were wet-mounted on a glass slide with cover slip, illuminated with U.V. light using a Texas Red filter with 596 nm excitation and 620 nm emission wavelengths (Olympus America, Inc., Melville, NY). Images were observed at 100× magnification and photographed with a Spot RT-cooled CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, MI). For the quantification of P-bodies by fluorescence microscopy Dcp2p-mCh-positive structures were counted in a minimum total of 100 cells. The percent of P-bodies was averaged from 3 independent experiments using the following formula: (number of P-bodies/number of cells counted) × 100.

Table 1 Strains used in this study.

Viability assays

Viability assays were performed using 1 × 10 7 cell/ml aliquots taken from cultures at OD600 nm between 0.5-0.8. For agar plate assays, 5 μl from 1/10 serial dilutions (ranging from 107 to 103 cell/ml) were inoculated in CSM agar plates. Plates were incubated at 27°C for three days. Growth curves were also performed to validate these observations by inoculating 1 × 10 7 cell/ml aliquots in CSM media. OD600 nm measurements were taken every two hours for up to eight hours.

Ribosome fractionation by differential centrifugation

Yeast cells were treated with 50 μg/ml of cycloheximide to halt translation immediately before harvesting by centrifugation (2,061 × g for 5 min at 4°C). Cell pellets were washed with ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 7 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF and 50 μg/ml cycloheximide) and then resuspended in 1.5 ml of lysis buffer together with a quarter volume of acid-washed 0.5 mm glass beads. Cells were disrupted by vortex mixing for 20 seconds with 30-second intervals on ice (repeated 10 times). Unbroken cells and large debris were removed by a low speed spin (800 × g for 10 min at 4°C). The supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, yielding supernatant (S10) and pellet (P10). Supernatant S10 was collected, layered onto an equal volume of a 50% sucrose solution and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min at 4°C (Beckman 80 Ti rotor) thereby yielding supernatant S100 and ribosomal pellet P100. A novel method has been described recently for affinity purification of ribosomes [10]. This method allows purification of polysomes that are devoid of non-ribosomal cellular components which may co-purify with ribosomes by the classical 50% sucrose cushion method used here and can increase recovery of free ribosomes and/or lighter polysomes that may remain in the S100 fraction [[10], and our unpublished observations].

RNA Extraction

Ribosomal pellets contained in P100 fractions, immunoprecipitation eluates, and sucrose density gradient fractions, were all resuspended in a guanidine thiocyanate buffer containing 10% mercaptoethanol (RLT buffer, RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen). RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit for isolation of total RNA (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentrations were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). The purity and integrity of the RNA was monitored by electrophoresis using an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Typically we obtained approximately 20 μg of RNA from ribosome pellets and 0.1 μg of RNA from immunoprecipitation experiments. A control for DNA contamination (PCR of the RNA without a prior RT reaction) was routinely performed for each total RNA preparation.

Yeast oligonucleotide microarray hybridization and analysis

Microarray hybridization experiments were each conducted with three biological and one technical replicates using total RNA extracted from ribosomal pellets of wild type and myo1Δ strains. Experiments were performed as described in [6], 1.0 μg of total RNA extracted from ribosomal pellets was amplified using the Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear Amplification kit (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Amplified cRNA was labeled with 10 mM Cyanine 5-CTP (Cy5) or Cyanine 3-CTP (Cy3) (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA). Labeled cRNAs were purified with Qiagen RNeasy mini spin columns and dye incorporation was monitored on an Agilent Bioanalyzer. Hybridization of Cy5 and Cy3 labeled cRNAs were performed using Yeast Oligo Microarrays slides and hybridization kit from Agilent Technologies (Sheldon Manufacturing, Cornelius, Oregon) at 60°C overnight. Slides were washed and scanned with a VersArray Chip Reader system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at a resolution of 5 μm with detector sensitivity values set between 704-800 and laser power at 85%. Scanned images were transferred to the Imagene 3.0 software program (Biodiscovery, El Segundo, CA) for further analysis to locate spots, adjust the appropriate grid, and obtain the Cy3 and Cy5 TIFF files. The microarrays raw data was then analyzed using Limma software (Bioconductor Package 1.7) [24]. The individual data sets were normalized using the locally weighted linear regression (Lowess) within each array. After normalization, the difference between the experimental and control signal was calculated, replicates were combined, and their averages were calculated. The fold change in gene expression was calculated by 2(M), where M is the log2-fold change ratio after background correction and normalization. An Empirical Bayes Statistics for differential expression analysis (eBayes statistics) was performed [25]. A p-value ≤ 0.01 was established as the cutoff for differential expression. In addition, a false discovery rate (FDR) was performed with Limma software [26]. Microarray raw and processed data are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) site of NCBI GSE20203

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis was performed using the Limma package of Bioconductor [27]. Briefly, a gene set file was created classifying all the genes included in the microarray into groups according to their specific involvement in a biological process. From this gene set, a total of 25 categories were represented according to the Osprey network visualization software [Additional file 1] [28], matching the category with the t-value. Then, the Limma software calculated the average of the t-values for each biological process category to determine the average fold-change for the category. The significance of differential expression was determined through an enrichment analysis by calculating the significance after 10,000 permutations. The initial cutoff to determine that the gene set was differentially expressed was p≤ 0.01. The final corrected p-value obtained using the Bonferroni correction was p≤ 0.00056.

Confirmation of microarray data by real time RT-PCR

Microarray results were corroborated by real time RT-PCR analysis using a subset of genes involved in cell wall and ribosome biogenesis. Real Time RT-PCR was performed with 25 ng of RNA extracted from ribosomal pellets using Quantitec SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) with primers at 0.5 μM (Table 2) and a final reaction volume of 25 μl. The reactions were performed following the conditions recommended by the manufacturer using the iCycler iQ Multicolor real time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The PCR quantification and melting curves were generated using the iCycler software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The fold change was determined by the 2ΔΔCt method [29]. The ΔCt of the control and experimental samples was calculated from the threshold cycle of the target gene minus the threshold cycle of the reference gene (ACT1) in triplicate experiments. The ΔΔCt was then calculated by subtracting the averaged ΔCt of the control samples minus the averaged ΔCt of the experimental sample. Reagent controls were included to test for DNA contamination.

Table 2 Primers used in this study.

Sucrose Density Gradients

Wild type and myo1Δ strains were grown overnight at 26°C to an optical density between 0.5-0.8 (OD600) in 200 ml complete synthetic media (CSM, 2% glucose and 1× nitrogen base). At the time of harvest, 1 ml of 5 mg/ml cycloheximide was added per 50 ml of yeast culture, then cultures were chilled on ice for 5 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 2.5 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 140 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, 50 μg/ml cycloheximide and 0.5 mg/ml Heparin). Cells were disrupted by vortexing for 20 s with 30 s intervals on ice (10 times). After cell lysis, glass beads and excess cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 2,061 × g for 5 min. at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 8,072 × g for 5 min at 4°C. RNA content in the resulting supernatant was determined by ultraviolet light absorbance at 260 nanometers wavelength (A260). 60 A260 absorbance units were layered onto 11 ml, 10% to 50% sucrose density gradients. The gradients were sedimented via centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 160 min at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 rotor. Forty-five fractions of 250 μl were collected from top to bottom of each gradient and A260 was measured. Consecutive fractions were pooled, generating a total of nine fractions for each gradient. Guanidine thiocyanate buffer containing 10% mercaptoethanol was added to each fraction and RNA extraction was performed as previously described. Extracts prepared from the wild type strain were employed to establish the normal profile for these culture conditions. The profiles included peaks with densities corresponding to 40 S and 60 S subunits preceding the monosomes (80 S fraction), and the polysomes were indicated. The agarose gels were included below each density profile to illustrate the electropherograms of rRNA derived from each pooled gradient fraction and their lane numbers correspond to each of the numbered fractions identified in the sucrose density gradient profiles.

RT- PCR Analysis

For RT-PCR analysis, first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 25 ng of RNA in a total volume of 10 μl. The procedure was performed using the Quantitec Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcriptase reactions were carried out for 15 min at 42°C followed by heat inactivation for 3 min at 95°C. For each PCR reaction 3 μl of the cDNA reaction mixture together with 25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dNTP, 5× FlexiGo Taq Buffer, 10 mM PCR-specific primers (Table 2) and 5 units Taq polymerase were used. The amplification reactions were performed for 30 cycles (each cycle consisted of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55.7°C, and 1 min at 72 °C). Real-time RT-PCR experiments were performed in triplicate for microarray validations of a subset of genes and the quantitative data was obtained directly from the instrument (BioRad iCycler) (Table 3 and 4). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR experiments for validation of regulated mRNAs from polysome gradient fractions were performed in duplicate. The RT-PCR products were examined by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and scanning densitometry. Quantification of mRNAs from RT-PCR experiments was determined by dividing the value of pixels/square area (mm) from the experimental mRNA RT-PCR product by the value of pixels/square area (mm) generated by ACT1 mRNA RT-PCR products from the same sample and averaging the results of two experiments. The Standard Error of the Mean (S.E.M.) was calculated for each experiment and results were expressed in histogram form with each set of gel images.

Table 3 Confirmation of microarray data by real time RT-PCR assay on a selected set of mRNAs from myo1Δ strains.
Table 4 Translation initiation factors down regulated in myo1Δ strains.

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 2,061 × g, washed in ice cold CSM media and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton × 100, 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (50× stock; Roche), 10 mM PMSF). Cells were disrupted by vortex mixing for 20 seconds with 30-second intervals on ice (repeated 10 times). Protein extract was centrifuged at 15,115 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C, the supernatant was removed and quantified using the DC Protein Assay method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Total protein extracts (75 μg) were separated in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 0.37A for 1 h in a Mini Trans Blot Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 4°C. For analysis of phosphorylated eIF2α, the membrane was incubated with anti-phospho-eIF2α polyclonal antibody (1:1000) in TBS (Tris Buffered Saline, Sigma Aldrich) containing 0.1% Tween 20 5% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin, Sigma Aldrich) at 4°C overnight and rinsed in TBS 0.1% Tween 20 three times at 10 minutes per wash (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA). Membranes were stripped and reprobed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody that recognized both the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of eIF2αp from yeast (a generous gift by Dr. Thomas E. Dever). Finally, membranes were probed with monoclonal antibody against Pgk1p (1:125 dilution) (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA) as a loading control. For eIF4Gp and eIF4Ep, membranes were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-eIF4Gp (1:1000) and anti- eIF4Ep (1:500) (kindly provided by Dr. Peter Reid). Dcp2p-mCh was detected using 1:1000 anti-DsRed (CloneTech, Palo Alto, CA) polyclonal antibodies. After binding of the primary antibody, the washed membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated to HRP at a 1:5000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature and washed again as described, developed with a chemiluminescent substrate (Super Signal West Pico, Thermo Scientific), and exposed to X-ray film at multiple exposure times. X-ray films were scanned with a Molecular Imager FX Pro Plus (BioRad) and digital image intensities were quantified using Quantity One 4.5.2 software (BioRad). The values derived from the ratio of the intensity of the test protein band relative to the intensity of its PGK loading control were averaged from duplicate experiments.

eIF2α-P and Dcp2p-mCh immunoprecipitation

For immunoprecipitation experiments, 3 μg of total protein extracts were incubated with anti-DsRed, an anti-mCherry antibody (CloneTech, Palo Alto, CA), or anti-phospho-eIF2α (eIF2α-P) (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA,) polyclonal antibodies (1:100) and Protein A immunobeads overnight at 4°C. The beads were washed four times with wash buffers (Buffer A1, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5,1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl; Buffer A2, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5,1% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl; and Buffer A3, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1% Np-40) and samples were divided into two aliquots. For protein analysis, IP supernatant was analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis was performed as previously described. For RNA isolation, the antibody-reacted Protein A immunobeads were resuspended in 200 μl of RLT buffer. RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) for isolation of total RNA. Typically, a yield of 0.1 μg of RNA was obtained from an initial input of 3 μg of total cellular protein extract. RT-PCR analyses were performed from duplicate immunoprecipitation experiments using specific primers for RPS8A, RPL7B, RPL3, CHS4, PIR3 and ACT1 mRNAs as previously described. Positive control experiments were conducted with wild-type strains using equivalent amounts of isolated mRNA extracted from eIF4Ep immunoprecipitated fractions. These experiments yielded positive RT-PCR signals for the RPS8A, RPL7B, RPL3, CHS4, PIR3 and ACT1 mRNAs tested [Additional file 2], thereby providing proof that the input mRNA extracted from the immunoprecipitated proteins in this study was not degraded. An equivalent amount (0.1 μg) of input total RNA (extracted from cell lysates prior to immunoprecipitation) was amplified by RT-PCR with each primer pair to demonstrate that positive amplification of the specific mRNAs with each primer pair was efficient and specific [Additional file 3]. Mock immunoprecipitations were performed as a negative control for both the anti-Ds-red and anti-eIF2α-P experiments using total protein extract from wild-type strains incubated with Protein A immunobeads alone followed by RT-PCR amplification of the eluted fraction to corroborate the specificity of the co-precipitated mRNAs.


Identification of differentially translated mRNAs in myo1Δ strains

To identify mRNAs that may be differentially regulated under stress conditions by post-transcriptional mechanisms, yeast oligonucleotide microarray studies were conducted using mRNA targets derived from ribosome fractions of wild type and myo1Δ strains. A total of 1,301 mRNAs were differentially bound to the myo1Δ ribosomes (p ≤ 0.01) [Additional file 4] of which 560 were down regulated and 741 were up regulated in the myo1Δ strain compared to the wild type control strains. A net 1097 mRNAs were classified as uniquely regulated at the level of translation (of which 266 changed ≥ 2-fold) (Figure 1A) representing approximately 67% of a total of 1644 regulated genes compared to 21% of the genes identified by a previous global mRNA expression analysis [6]. A total of 204 genes representing 12% of the regulated genes were co-regulated at both the translational and transcriptional levels, where the majority of the co-regulated genes were regulated in the same direction (unidirectional regulation). These co-regulated genes are identified with their corresponding GO annotations and log2-transformed fold change ratios [Additional file 5]. The GO Biological Functions included: protein biosynthesis, metabolism, stress response, cell organization and biogenesis, transport and carbohydrate metabolism among other less represented categories [Additional file 5].

Figure 1
figure 1

Results of microarray analysis in myo1Δ strains. A) Venn diagram illustrating the relative percentage of regulated genes. Results of global expression of mRNAs were extracted from Rodríguez-Quiñones et al. [6]. Ribosome-associated mRNAs regulated by translation were identified in the current study. Co-regulated genes are defined as differentially expressed mRNAs that were regulated in both the global analysis and ribosome-associated RNA studies. The percentage shown for each category of genes reflects the number of represented genes relative to the total number of regulated genes (1644). B) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for Biological Process categories. Differentially regulated mRNAs were grouped according to Biological Process and represented graphically relative to the total population of genes in the yeast oligonucleotide microarray. Shown are histograms representing the distribution of individual genes by Density versus t-value. Only those Biological Process categories that reflected a statistically significant change in their average t-value are shown. The p-value cutoff was p≤ 0.00056. Red lines represent the distribution of genes in each specific Biological Process category. Black lines represent the distribution of all genes in the microarray. See Methods section for details.

To test our hypothesis that other genes of the cell wall damage transcription fingerprint [2, 5] may be differentially regulated by post-transcriptional mechanisms, we checked the ribosome-associated mRNA results for representative members. Nine mRNAs of the cell wall damage fingerprint were up regulated in the ribosome pool derived from the myo1Δ strain, of which 4 were co-regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (Table 5). These were considered to be post-transcriptionally regulated cell wall stress genes. Furthermore, between the five transcriptionally up regulated genes that were previously reported and the five post-transcriptionally up regulated mRNAs identified here, we accounted for a total of 50% of the cell wall damage fingerprint (10/20) being activated in the myo1Δ strains. This number was below the number of genes reported to be up regulated in a chs2Δ mutant [7] and in a fks1Δ mutant (85% each) tested under identical experimental conditions [data not shown]. These observations will be discussed later.

Table 5 Genes representing the main transcriptional fingerprint for cell wall stress 11 that were regulated in myo1Δ strains.

To analyze the global microarray data in terms of biological process categories, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed [27]. For this analysis a gene set was created for all the 6,256 genes contained in the microarray according to their classification in 25 biological process categories referenced by Osprey network visualization software [28] [Additional file 1], considering the t-value for each gene, and then calculating the mean of the t-value of each category to determine the average fold-change for the category. The significance of differential expression was determined using the cut-off value of p ≤ 0.00056. Of the 25 categories considered for the GSEA, four categories had a corrected p-value below the cutoff (p-value≤0.00056). These categories were protein biosynthesis, metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and genes of unknown biological functions (Figure 1B). Among the four categories identified, protein biosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism presented the most dramatic deviation from the normal (overall) distribution of t-values.

The histogram for the carbohydrate metabolism category reflected a shift in their distribution towards positive t-values (Figure 1B). Among the carbohydrate metabolism genes related to cell wall biosynthesis were 7 chitin biosynthesis genes- 4 up regulated and 3 down regulated genes [Additional file 6]. Genes involved in chitin synthesis and transport CHS5 (1.4), CHS6 (1.6) and CHS7 (1.4), and the essential N-acetylglucosamine-phosphate mutase, PCM1 (1.8 fold), were up regulated. However, there were decreases in representation of mRNAs for uridine diphosphate-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) transporter YEA4 (-1.2 fold), chitin synthase II CHS2 (-2.3 fold), and activator of Chs3p CHS4 (-2.2 fold), enzyme components that are an integral part of chitin biosynthesis.

Genes for glucose and glycogen metabolism (which fall under the carbohydrate metabolism category) were also significantly activated with 11/14 co-regulated genes [Additional file 5], suggesting a vital importance for these gene functions. Among the most highly up regulated (> 5-fold) were TPS1 (5.3), that encodes the synthase subunit of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase complex, which synthesizes the storage carbohydrate trehalose; GDB1 (7.3), a glycogen debranching enzyme containing glucanotransferase and alpha-1,6-amyloglucosidase activities, required for glycogen degradation; GLC3(7.4), a glycogen branching enzyme, involved in glycogen accumulation; UGP1(9.1), a UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGPase) catalyses the reversible formation of UDP-Glc from glucose 1-phosphate and UTP; GND2(9.9), a 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase catalyzes an NADPH regenerating reaction in the pentose phosphate pathway; HXK1(14.2), a hexokinase isoenzyme 1, a cytosolic protein that catalyzes phosphorylation of glucose; and GPH1(18.9), a non-essential glycogen phosphorylase required for the mobilization of glycogen.

The histogram for the protein biosynthesis category reflected a shift from the normal distribution towards negative t-values. Out of a total of 74 genes that were identified in this category, 69 were down regulated. Among these there was a significant representation of 46 ribosomal protein (RP) genes [Additional file 4] and six translation initiation factors (Table 4). This result was predictable due to the great quantity of genes related to protein biosynthesis that were down regulated in the global analysis of gene expression [6].

To more precisely relate the results of this study with previous results of the ESR studies by Gasch et al. [9] and Halbeisen and Gerber [10], we compared the genes regulated by transcription and degradation [Supplementary file 1 from ref [6]], co-regulated genes [Additional file 5], and genes regulated by translation [Additional file 4]. This analysis showed that 277/315 (88%) mRNAs with log2 fold-change ratios ≥ 2 and p-values ≤ 0.01 regulated by transcription & degradation in myo1Δ, were also regulated in the ESR [Additional file 7] and 142/145 (98%) mRNAs with log2 fold-change ratios ≥ 2 and p-values ≤ 0.01 co-regulated genes in myo1Δ, were also regulated in the ESR [Additional file 8]. Of the ribosome-associated mRNAs significantly regulated (p ≤ 0.01) in the ESR reported by Halbeisen and Gerber (in Data set S3) [10] we found 313/1097 (29%) mRNAs regulated exclusively by translation in myo1Δ [Additional file 9]. Comparison of post-transcriptionally regulated genes related to cell wall biogenesis in myo1Δ to translationally regulated genes in ESR [10] identified 7 out of 34 genes in both datasets [Additional file 6].

Validation of expression microarray results using RP mRNA polysome profiles

To validate the interpretation of microarray data generated from translated mRNAs of myo1Δ strains, the overall translational activity of wild type and myo1Δ strains was analyzed indirectly by examining their polysome profiles using sucrose density gradients. In myo1Δ strains, there was a relative increase in the 80 S monosome fraction and a relative decrease in the intensity of the densest polysome peaks, fractions 7-9, indicative of a possible reduction in the efficiency of translation initiation relative to the wild type controls (Figure 2A and 2B). However, the translational repression did not apply to all genes since more than 50% of mRNAs associated with the polysomes were up regulated in the myo1Δ strain (Figure 1A) [Additional file 4].

Figure 2
figure 2

Analysis of polysome profiles. Equivalent amounts of total cell lysate from A) wild-type (wt) and B) myo1Δ strains were loaded onto 10-50% sucrose gradients. The u.v. absorbance of pooled sequential gradient fractions (numbered consecutively) was measured at 260 nm (see Methods for details). The 40 S, 60 S, and 80 S fractions were classified as non-polysome fractions. All subsequent fractions were classified as polysome fractions. Polysome peaks were numbered consecutively according to their fraction number (4-9). Total RNA extracted from each of the fractions was subjected to electrophoretic analysis of ribosomal RNAs (25 S and 18S).

To determine if the apparent regulation of mRNAs by translation interpreted from microarray hybridization experiments was supported by their distribution in polysome gradient fractions, three translationally regulated ribosomal protein (RP) mRNAs RPL7B (low-fold change sample, -1.6), RPL3 (medium-fold change sample, -2.9), and RPS8A (high-fold change sample, -8) (Figure 3A) and five translationally regulated mRNAs of the cell wall damage fingerprint SRL3, PST1, PIR3, YPS4, and KTR2 were analyzed (Figure 3B). The changes in polysome distributions were hard to differentiate in the low-fold and medium-fold change sample RP mRNAs suggesting that the polysome gradient may have limited sensitivity in these ranges. In the high-fold change sample, RPS8A mRNA was decreased in the heaviest polysomes fractions 6-9, and was slightly decreased in the 80 S monosomes in the myo1Δ strain when compared to wild type controls (Figure 3A), supporting that there was a significant decrease in the efficiency of translation of RPS8A mRNA. All five mRNAs representing the cell wall damage fingerprint had a greater recruitment of mRNA in the heavier polysomes (fractions 7-9), supporting that there was a relative increase in their translation efficiency, as well as in the other less dense fractions (fractions 1 and 2) in the myo1Δ strain (Figure 3B). Previous global mRNA expression analysis where wild-type versus myo1Δ strains were compared showed that none of the five translationally regulated cell wall damage mRNAs were changed at the global level (Table 5). Computer-based analysis of 5'UTR sequences of the translationally down regulated RP mRNAs [30] did not support the existence of regulatory secondary structures in their 5'UTRs as a potential mechanism for the repression of translation in this group [data not shown].

Figure 3
figure 3

Validation of regulated genes by RT-PCR analysis of mRNA from polysome fractions. Total RNA was extracted from polysome fractions of wild type (wt) (left panels) and myo1Δ (right panels) strains. A) RT-PCR analysis of ribosomal protein mRNAs RPL7B, RPL3, RPS8A. B) RT-PCR analysis of mRNAs SRL3, PST1, PIR3, YPS4, and KTR2 regulated in response to cell wall damage. The RT-PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and normalized against ACT1, a cytoskeletal protein mRNA that was not regulated in the microarray hybridization study. The lane numbers at the top of each gel correspond to the sucrose density gradient fractions shown in Figure 2. Below each set of gels is shown the results of densitometry analysis of RT-PCR products from duplicate experiments. See Methods for details.

Regulation of translation initiation factors in myo1Δ strains

To establish how translation was regulated in myo1Δ strains, we analyzed two common mechanisms for down regulation of translation initiation described in yeast. One mechanism is the phosphorylation on Ser 51 of the alpha subunit of initiation factor eIF2p by Gcn2p protein kinase [18, 19]. Phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of the initiation factor eIF2p results in reduced binding of met-tRNAi to the 40 S ribosomal subunit and decreased translation [18]. To test whether down regulation of translation observed in the myo1Δ strains was regulated by this mechanism, we analyzed eIF2p levels by Western blot analysis with antibodies specific for eIF2αp subunit phosphorylated on Ser-51 (eIF2α-P) (Figure 4A). The results show a relative increase in phosphorylation levels of eIF2αp in the myo1Δ strain compared to the wild type strain, while the total eIF2αp protein levels remained constant (Figure 4A). The other mechanism for down regulation of translation initiation is by the reduction in steady state levels of the initiation factor eIF4Gp [31]. When tested, the steady state levels of the initiation factor eIF4Gp were visibly decreased in myo1Δ relative to the wild-type strain (Figure 4B). Conversely, the steady state level of initiation factor eIF4Ep, the cap-binding component of the eIF4F complex, was not affected (Figure 4C). These experiments supported the hypothesis that translation repression was activated in the myo1Δ strain by Gcn2p-dependent phosphorylation of eIF2αp and by a reduction in steady state levels of eIF4Gp.

Figure 4
figure 4

Western blot analysis of translation initiation factors. Equivalent amounts of total protein (75 μg) extracted from wild type (wt) and myo1Δ strain cultures were analyzed for the steady state levels of A) eIF2αp and it's phosphorylated form eIF2α-P, B) eIF4Gp, C) eIF4Ep. Shown are equivalent autoradiography exposures of each membrane probed with their corresponding antibodies. Pgk1p was used as a loading control in each experiment while unphosphorylated eIF2αp served as an additional loading control in panel A. The histogram below each panel illustrates the ratio of the intensity from each test protein band relative to the intensity of its PGK loading control, averaged from duplicate experiments. See Methods for details.

Deletion of GCN2 (gcn2Δ) in both wild-type and myo1Δ strains abolished eIF2αp phosphorylation confirming that this regulation was mediated directly by Gcn2p (Figure 5A). In addition, a myo1Δgcn2Δ mutant exhibited a negative genetic interaction between these mutations characterized by an abnormal morphological phenotype (Figure 5B) and a severe growth defect (Figure 5C). The synthetic growth defect exhibited by the interaction between myo1Δ and gcn2Δ mutations was rescued by complementation with a plasmid copy of the wild-type MYO1 gene, myo1Δgcn2ΔpRS316-MYO1+ (Figure 5C) indicating that it was not caused by secondary mutation(s).

Figure 5
figure 5

Assessing the importance of GCN2 regulation. Assays were conducted with wild type (wt), myo1Δ, gcn2Δ and myo1Δgcn2Δ strains. A) Western blot analysis of steady state levels of eIF2αp and its phosphorylated form eIF2α-P in total protein extracts derived from each strain. Pgk1p was used as a loading control, B) The morphological phenotype of each strain was observed by light microscopy at 100× magnification, C) Serial dilutions of cell suspensions from cultures of wild type (wt), myo1Δ, gcn2Δ, myo1Δgcn2Δ, and myo1Δgcn2ΔpRS316-MYO1+ strains were inoculated on CSM agar medium and allowed to grow for three days at 30°C for viability assays. The strain myo1Δgcn2ΔpRS316-MYO1+ was included to analyze complementation of the myo1Δgcn2Δ synthetic growth defect with a plasmid copy of the wild type MYO1 gene. Indicated at the top is the number of cells per 5 μL dilution.

Analysis of P-bodies and identification of a novel reservoir for non-translating RP mRNAs in myo1Δ strains

Other laboratories have reported that non-translating mRNAs can accumulate in discrete ribonucleoprotein structures called Processing bodies or P-bodies and have correlated a reduction in their translation with an increase in the accumulation of these structures in the cytoplasm [20]. To test if P-bodies play a role in the down regulation of protein biosynthesis in myo1Δ strains, we used a recombinant reporter protein Dcp2p-mCherry (Dcp2p-mCh), where Dcp2p is an mRNA decapping enzyme previously reported as a component of these structures [20]. Our results indicated that 70% of myo1Δ cells grown in glucose-supplemented complete synthetic media accumulated P-bodies structures relative to wild type control strains in which only 10% of cells presented these structures (Figure 6 + GLU). When placed under glucose deprivation conditions, 80% of wild type cells accumulated P-bodies (Figure 6 - GLU) consistent with previous reports [20]. In myo1Δ cells, these structures did not increase significantly in number (78%) when subjected to glucose deprivation (Figure 6 - GLU), suggesting that the myo1Δ strain was subjected to a type of starved-state.

Figure 6
figure 6

Visualization of P-bodies in vivo. Wild type (wt) and myo1Δ yeast strains were transformed with a plasmid encoding a recombinant form of decapping enzyme Dcp2p tagged with the fluorescent probe mCherry (Dcp2p-mCh). Transformed strains were grown in CSM broth with glucose (+ GLU) and in CSM broth without glucose (-GLU). Upper panels represent light micrographs and lower panels represent the corresponding u.v. fluorescence micrographs for each condition. All images were captured at the same exposure time and magnification (100×). The graph below shows a quantification of the average number of P- bodies per 100 cells. See Methods for details.

Immunoprecipitation of Dcp2p-mCh protein was performed with wild type and myo1Δ extracts to determine if translationally repressed mRNAs were associated with this protein. Co-precipitated mRNA was extracted from immunoprecipitates and RT-PCR analysis was performed using primers for RP mRNAs RPS8A, RPL3, and RPL7B; and non-RP mRNAs PIR3 (an mRNA encoding a cell wall protein that was up regulated 15-fold), CHS4 (an mRNA encoding the activator of Chs3p that was down regulated 2.1-fold), and ACT1 (a control mRNA encoding cytoskeletal actin that was not differentially regulated by translation) (Figure 7). Results demonstrated that RP mRNAs were equally represented in the fraction containing immunoprecipitated Dcp2p-mCh protein from both the wild type and myo1Δ strains cultured under glucose-rich conditions (Figure 7 left panel) while PIR3, CHS4 and ACT1 mRNAs were absent from the same Dcp2p-mCh-positive fractions (Figure 7 right panel).

Figure 7
figure 7

Detection of mRNAs associated with a Dcp2p-mCh immunoprecipitated protein fraction. Dcp2p-mCh, a protein component of P-bodies, was immunoprecipitated from whole cell protein extracts of wild type (wt) and myo1Δ strains. Total RNA was extracted from the immunoprecipitated fractions and RT-PCR analysis of mRNAs for RPS8A, RPL7B, RPL3 (left panels) and ACT1, CHS4, PIR3 (right panels) was performed. Mock immunoprecipitations were performed as a negative control for each experiment using total protein extract incubated with Protein A immunobeads alone followed by RT-PCR amplification of the eluted fraction.

To investigate the selective translational repression of RP mRNAs further, we characterized their relationship with the phosphorylated form of eIF2αp. eIF2α-P was immunoprecipitated from wild type and myo1Δ extracts and confirmed by Western blot with eIF2α-P-specific antibody. To test if mRNA was co-precipitated with eIF2α-P, we extracted RNA from the immunoprecipitated eIF2α-P fractions and RT-PCR analysis was performed using specific primers for RPS8A, RPL7B, RPL3, PIR3, CHS4, and ACT1 (Figure 8). Surprisingly, we found that RPS8A, RPL7B and RPL3 were differentially co-precipitated with eIF2α-P in the myo1Δ strain, thereby suggesting an association between eIF2α-P-containing complexes and the non-translating RP mRNAs (Figure 8 left panel). In contrast, PIR3, CHS4, and ACT1 mRNAs were not detected in these same eIF2α-P immunoprecipitated fractions (Figure 8 right panel). To rule out mRNA degradation of PIR3, CHS4, and ACT1, an immunoprecipitation experiment was performed with eIF4E. RT-PCR of eIF4E-associated mRNA confirmed presence of these mRNAs in the translating pool [Additional file 2].

Figure 8
figure 8

Detection of mRNAs associated with a eIF2α-P immunoprecipitated protein fraction. The translation initiation factor eIF2α-P was immunoprecipitated from whole cell protein extracts of wild type (wt) and myo1Δ strains. Total RNA was extracted from the immunoprecipitated fractions and RT-PCR analysis of mRNAs for RPS8A, RPL7B, RPL3 (left panels) and ACT1, CHS4, PIR3 (right panels) was performed. Mock immunoprecipitations were performed as a negative control for each experiment as described in Figure 7.


Eukaryotic cells have developed transcriptional and post-transcriptional controls that regulate specific cohorts of genes in response to environmental stresses. Genome-scale analysis of transcription was undertaken to identify regulated genes responding to stress conditions with the identification of repressed cohorts mostly corresponding to ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis with activated cohorts that corresponded to energy metabolism, heat shock proteins, and other stress response genes [9]. Subsequent studies have expanded this approach to study the relation between transcriptome and translatome following transient exposure to mild and severe stress conditions resulting in the identification of characteristic coordinated responses [10]. Mild forms of stress mainly produced changes in translating mRNAs in the ribosomes with relatively minor changes in global levels of mRNAs whereas severe stress produced major changes in global transcript levels representing changes in transcription and mRNA stability, that correlated with changes in the translating mRNAs found in the ribosomes. In cells that underwent transient exposure to a severe stress, 97% of the transcriptionally regulated mRNAs were co-regulated [10]. Based on such previous studies, the expression profiles of myo1Δ cells resemble those generated by exposure to severe stress because co-regulation of genes was observed, although there were much fewer (only 12%) co-regulated genes. However, when we used strictly those genes that were significantly regulated 2-fold or greater for this comparison, we observed an increase in the level of co-regulation to 98% in the myo1Δ strain.

The predominant GO Biological Process categories represented by this group of co-regulated genes were not limited to a single category and overlapped with some of the categories previously reported by others [9, 10]. A comparison of genes regulated by transcription or degradation, co-regulation, and translation levels in myo1Δ and ESR shows that a substantial number of genes were regulated in common. Among the Biological Process categories most represented in common between myo1Δ and ESR were Metabolic Process (78% of the genes in this category), Carbohydrate Metabolic Process (12%), Translation (25%), and Biosynthetic Process (48%) [Additional file 10].

Of the 20 core genes induced by different types of cell wall damage conditions, only five of these genes were up regulated globally in myo1Δ strains [6]. Our current analysis of post-transcriptionally regulated genes identified 9 genes, five additional genes. With the exception of SLT2 (not regulated post-transcriptionally) [6, 7], it is not clear whether the expression of any of the remaining nine genes of the cell wall damage fingerprint is relevant to the survival of myo1Δ strains. A search of the Saccharomyces genome database (SGD, showed that these genes share no previously reported genetic interactions with myo1Δ (data not shown). A rigorous test of this hypothesis will require further genetic analysis of these genes in the viable myo1Δ genetic background to validate any potential genetic interactions with MYO1. Despite the nonconformance of myo1Δ with full activation of the 20 reported cell wall damage genes, it was already shown that the PKC1-dependent cell wall integrity pathway is activated by this mutation [6, 7]. Thus, we propose that impaired cytokinesis per se can represent another type of stress that leads to PKC1 activation and that SLT2/MPK1 regulates key cellular functions unrelated to cell wall biogenesis for survival of the myo1Δ strain.

The Heat Shock Protein family (HSP) of genes represented one of the most dramatically up regulated groups in this study. In this group we identified significant up regulation (p ≤ 0.01) of HSP78 (2.6 fold), HSP42 (5.9 fold), HSP104 (6.8 fold), HSP82 (3.0 fold), HSP30 (18.7 fold) and HSP48 (2.9 fold) [Additional file 4]. The Hsp family has a variety of functions. For example, Hsp82p/Hsp90p has been shown to play a role in regulation of protein kinase Gcn2p [32] and thus may be directly related to the putative increase in Gcn2p activity in myo1Δ strains. A second function of Hsp is the stabilization of other proteins to help the organism acquire tolerance to stress [33]. Lindquist and colleagues recently published that the molecular chaperone Hsp90 enables the emergence and maintenance of fungal drug resistance in Candida albicans[34]. The homolog of HSP90 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, HSP82, was translationally up regulated 3.2 fold in the myo1Δ strain. However, the complex functions described for this protein preclude a converging mechanism, but the possibility of an overlapping mechanism for drug resistance and stress response is noteworthy.

The current Gene Set Enrichment Analysis resulted in two significantly regulated categories- protein biosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. The up regulation of genes in chitin biosynthesis supports our previous conclusion related to the importance of chitin biosynthesis for normal growth of myo1 Δ strains [35, 36]. A previous study demonstrated a synthetic lethal interaction between chs6Δ and myo1Δ[37] suggesting that correct trafficking of Chs3p was important for survival in myo1Δ strains. The current results expand this idea that increased chitin synthesis is due to up regulating transport and targeting of Chs3p to the plasma membrane and not the synthesis of enzymatic subunits. Such changes must be further studied at the protein level to ascertain if the observed changes in mRNA translation patterns are biologically relevant.

The large representation of RP mRNAs and translation initiation factors that were down regulated in the protein biosynthesis category, support the idea that ribosome biogenesis and translation initiation were compromised in myo1Δ strains. Of 137 RP genes in the yeast genome, 46 were down regulated post-transcriptionally in the myo1Δ strain with 83 previously shown to be down regulated by global analysis and 8 reflecting no change in their steady state or translation levels [6]. These results indicate that in addition to the reported transcriptional regulation of RP genes, there can be significant co-regulation of these genes (35/137) in myo1Δ strains. Furthermore, RPS8A, RPL3 and RPL7B were consistently detected in the eIF4Ep, eIF2α-P and Dcp2p-mCh-containing fractions indicating the existence of an actively translating mRNA fraction normally associated with eIF4Ep-containing complexes, a non-translating RP mRNA fraction associated with a novel eIF2α-P-containing complex, and a separate non-translating RP mRNA fraction associated with a Dcp2p-mCh-containing protein fraction (Figure 9). To our knowledge, this is the first time such a selective association between translationally repressed RP mRNAs and eIF2α-P is described. The significance of this association is yet unclear.

Figure 9
figure 9

Diagram of proposed mRNA translation control pathways. Translating mRNAs are normally associated with eIF4F, which ultimately leads to the initiation of protein synthesis. In a process that can be mediated by stress sensors in the yeast cell plasma membrane, non-translating mRNAs may become associated with P-bodies that may lead to either mRNA decay or temporary sequestration of mRNAs for subsequent retrieval to the translating mRNA pool after adaptation to the stress. A novel eIF2α-P-containing complex is proposed as an alternative pathway for sequestration of non-translating RP mRNAs (blue-lined box). Asterisks identify immunoprecipitated proteins that were associated to translating or non-translating mRNAs in this study.

It is well known that the TOR signaling pathway is of vital importance for growth control. Certain characteristics of the myo1Δ strain are similar to those seen when the TOR signaling pathway is down regulated. For example, our microarray analysis showed that protein biosynthesis is down regulated in myo1Δ strains. In experiments where the TOR pathway has been inhibited, ribosome biogenesis has been shown to be down regulated [38]. The changes in the levels of eIF2α-P and eIF4G presented here are reminiscent of those changes associated with the inactivation of the TOR signaling pathway by nutrient starvation or rapamycin treatment [19, 31]. Furthermore, the P-body microscopy also suggests that the myo1Δ strain is already in a starved-state. The dependence of eIF2αp phosphorylation on GCN2 expression and the GCN2 and MYO1 genetic interaction presented earlier also points to the importance of the TOR pathway since Gcn2p activation is regulated by the TOR pathway [19]. This body of evidence has prompted us to investigate whether genes of the cell wall damage fingerprint that were not regulated at the transcriptional level could be regulated post-transcriptionally via the TOR pathway. Western blot analysis showed that the levels of eIF2α-P and eIF4Gp in myo1Δ strains with or without rapamycin treatment were similar to wild-type cells treated with rapamycin (data now shown), suggesting that the TOR pathway was already deactivated in myo1Δ strains prior to treatment. A second study measuring the phosphorylation state of Npr1p (a protein kinase regulated by TOR) also supports that the TOR pathway is down regulated in myo1Δ strains (G. Pagán and J. Rodríguez-Medina, unpublished observation). Since inhibition of the TOR signaling pathway in yeast is usually associated with a nutritional deficiency, it is not clear how the myo1Δ strain would initiate this signal. These preliminary results nonetheless support that down regulation of the TOR pathway may be an important mechanism for translation repression in the myo1Δ condition; however, further experiments are being done to confirm this and we cannot rule out the involvement of other signaling pathways, at this point.

Initiation factor eIF4Gp serves as an anchor for the binding of other initiation factors to the preinitiation complex. Reduced steady state levels of eIF4Gp in the myo1Δ strains are thought to reduce the number of translation initiation events. However, eIF4Gp is also present in yeast spliceosomes and genetic depletion of Tif4631p, one of the two eIF4Gp homologues in yeast, affects the splicing of a small number of pre-mRNAs that correspond to ribosomal proteins [39]. Of the three representative RP genes tested in our study, two pre-mRNAs have introns, RPL7B has 2 introns, and RPS8A has a 5'UTR intron. If eIF4G is affecting the splicing efficiency of these RP mRNAs, a reduction in the levels of eIF4G would mean fewer fully spliced mRNAs are available for translation. Therefore, to understand the full nature of the translational repression observed among ribosomal proteins, it will be important to assess if these and other intron-containing RP mRNAs undergo eIF4Gp-dependent inhibition of splicing.

Prior studies by Texeira et al. [23] have reported that non-translating mRNAs can accumulate in discrete cytoplasmic structures called P-bodies that serve as an mRNA pool that may be translated following recovery from a given stress situation. Their results suggested additional roles for P-bodies other than for mRNA degradation, such as an inactive mRNA reservoir [20, 23]. Our analysis showed that Dcp2p-mCh-positive fractions were associated with translationally down regulated RPS8A, RPL3 and RPL7B mRNAs at relatively equivalent levels in both myo1Δ and wild type cells despite the presence of P-bodies only in myo1Δ cells. However, further proof is needed to demonstrate that the Dcp2p-mCh-positive immunoprecipitated fractions actually represent P-bodies. These results do not exclude differential translational regulation of other mRNAs not tested here, by their sequestration in P-bodies.


In this study, we combined microarray analysis and polysome fractionation to identify translationally regulated and co-regulated genes in myo1Δ cells that cannot undergo normal cytokinesis due to the absence of myosin type II [40]. Altogether, these findings indicate that yeast cells display diverse adaptive changes in gene expression regulated at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Here we show there is a concerted post-transcriptional response to the myo1Δ stress with a significant cohort of co-regulated genes. We find that eIF2αp activity is down regulated in a Gcn2p-dependent manner; that Gcn2p activation implicates the TOR pathway; that eIF4Gp levels are down regulated; and that translation of RP mRNAs is down regulated in a manner that seems to be affected by their direct association with eIF2α-P (Figure 9). We have hypothesized that the cytokinesis defect caused by deletion of the MYO1 gene causes cell wall stress in addition to what may be a starved-state. Ramirez-Valle et al. reported that an energetic defect coupled to a reduction in mRNA translation rates, mimicked the defect observed by mTOR inhibition or nutrient deprivation in eIF4GI-silenced MCF10A cells [41]. We observed reductions in eIF4Gp levels and reductions in mRNA translation rates that could be a result of similar deficiencies in myo1Δ cells. Furthermore, we showed that in myo1Δ, regulated genes fall within functional categories of carbohydrate metabolism and protein biosynthesis described to be important for adaptation and survival in conditions of severe environmental stress [10] with some quantitative differences. In light of these previous studies, the large number of differentially up regulated genes in the myo1Δ strain together with the translational shutdown of others could represent a means of reprogramming gene expression to manage the chronic stress due to absence of myosin type II. In this scenario, only those mRNAs that facilitate a survival response would be efficiently translated. For example, selective translational activation of the transcription activator Gcn4p under conditions of translational repression has been previously reported in amino acid starvation conditions [42]. Alternatively, the translational down regulation of specific mRNAs encoding proteins that may be detrimental to cell survival is also possible. The line of investigation employed in this study identifies proteins involved in translationally regulated gene expression and will ultimately allow us to develop strategies to undermine the fungal stress response.


  1. Andrews PD, Stark MJ: Dynamic, Rho1p-dependent localization of Pkc1p to sites of polarized growth. J Cell Sci. 2000, 113 (Pt 15): 2685-2693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia R, Bermejo C, Grau C, Perez R, Rodriguez-Pena JM, Francois J, Nombela C, Arroyo J: The global transcriptional response to transient cell wall damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its regulation by the cell integrity signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (15): 15183-15195. 10.1074/jbc.M312954200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levin DE, Bowers B, Chen CY, Kamada Y, Watanabe M: Dissecting the protein kinase C/MAP kinase signalling pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Mol Biol Res. 1994, 40 (3): 229-239.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin H, Arroyo J, Sanchez M, Molina M, Nombela C: Activity of the yeast MAP kinase homologue Slt2 is critically required for cell integrity at 37 degrees C. Mol Gen Genet. 1993, 241 (1-2): 177-184. 10.1007/BF00280215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lagorce A, Hauser NC, Labourdette D, Rodriguez C, Martin-Yken H, Arroyo J, Hoheisel JD, Francois J: Genome-wide analysis of the response to cell wall mutations in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (22): 20345-20357. 10.1074/jbc.M211604200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez-Quinones JF, Irizarry RA, Diaz-Blanco NL, Rivera-Molina FE, Gomez-Garzon D, Rodriguez-Medina JR: Global mRNA expression analysis in myosin II deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals an impairment of cell integrity functions. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 34-10.1186/1471-2164-9-34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez-Quinones JF, Rodriguez-Medina JR: Differential gene expression signatures for cell wall integrity found in chitin synthase II (chs2Delta) and myosin II (myo1Delta) deficient cytokinesis mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Res Notes. 2009, 2: 87-10.1186/1756-0500-2-87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt M, Bowers B, Varma A, Roh DH, Cabib E: In budding yeast, contraction of the actomyosin ring and formation of the primary septum at cytokinesis depend on each other. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115 (Pt 2): 293-302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO: Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11 (12): 4241-57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Halbeisen RE, Gerber AP: Stress-Dependent Coordination of Transcriptome and Translatome in Yeast. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7 (5): e105-10.1371/journal.pbio.1000105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mata J, Marguerat S, Bahler J: Post-transcriptional control of gene expression: a genome-wide perspective. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005, 30 (9): 506-514. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gebauer F, Hentze MW: Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 5 (10): 827-835. 10.1038/nrm1488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhn KM, DeRisi JL, Brown PO, Sarnow P: Global and specific translational regulation in the genomic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a rapid transfer from a fermentable to a nonfermentable carbon source. Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 21 (3): 916-927. 10.1128/MCB.21.3.916-927.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Izawa S, Inoue Y: Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in yeast under ethanol stress. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009, 53 (Pt 2): 93-99. 10.1042/BA20090036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shenton D, Smirnova JB, Selley JN, Carroll K, Hubbard SJ, Pavitt GD, Ashe MP, Grant CM: Global translational responses to oxidative stress impact upon multiple levels of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (39): 29011-29021. 10.1074/jbc.M601545200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Varela JC, van Beekvelt C, Planta RJ, Mager WH: Osmostress-induced changes in yeast gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 1992, 6 (15): 2183-2190. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01392.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy JE: Posttranscriptional control of gene expression in yeast. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62 (4): 1492-1553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dever TE, Feng L, Wek RC, Cigan AM, Donahue TF, Hinnebusch AG: Phosphorylation of initiation factor 2 alpha by protein kinase GCN2 mediates gene-specific translational control of GCN4 in yeast. Cell. 1992, 68 (3): 585-596. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90193-G.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cherkasova VA, Hinnebusch AG: Translational control by TOR and TAP42 through dephosphorylation of eIF2alpha kinase GCN2. Genes Dev. 2003, 17 (7): 859-872. 10.1101/gad.1069003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Teixeira D, Parker R: Analysis of P-body assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2007, 18 (6): 2274-2287. 10.1091/mbc.E07-03-0199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchan JR, Muhlrad D, Parker R: P bodies promote stress granule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2009, 183 (3): 441-455. 10.1083/jcb.200807043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A: Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983, 153 (1): 163-168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Teixeira D, Sheth U, Valencia-Sanchez MA, Brengues M, Parker R: Processing bodies require RNA for assembly and contain nontranslating mRNAs. RNA. 2005, 11 (4): 371-382. 10.1261/rna.7258505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5 (10): R80-10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004, 3: Article3-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Benjamini Y, H Y: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical. 1995, 57 (1): 289-300.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstråle M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC: PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003, 34 (3): 267-273. 10.1038/ng1180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Tyers M: Osprey: a network visualization system. Genome Biol. 2003, 4 (3): R22-10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-r22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25 (4): 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ringner M, Krogh M: Folding free energies of 5'-UTRs impact post-transcriptional regulation on a genomic scale in yeast. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005, 1 (7): e72-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Berset C, Trachsel H, Altmann M: The TOR (target of rapamycin) signal transduction pathway regulates the stability of translation initiation factor eIF4G in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (8): 4264-4269. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Donze O, Picard D: Hsp90 binds and regulates Gcn2, the ligand-inducible kinase of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 [corrected]. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (12): 8422-8432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanchez Y, Taulien J, Borkovich KA, Lindquist S: Hsp104 is required for tolerance to many forms of stress. EMBO J. 1992, 11 (6): 2357-2364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cowen LE, Singh SD, Köhler JR, Collins C, Zaas AK, Schell WA, Aziz H, Mylonakis E, Perfect JR, Whitesell L, Lindquist S: Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (8): 2818-2823. 10.1073/pnas.0813394106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cruz JA, Garcia R, Rodriguez-Orengo JF, Rodriguez-Medina JR: Increased chitin synthesis in response to type II myosin deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun. 2000, 3 (1): 20-25. 10.1006/mcbr.2000.0180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodriguez-Medina JR, Cruz JA, Robbins PW, Bi E, Pringle JR: Elevated expression of chitinase 1 and chitin synthesis in myosin II-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 1998, 44 (6): 919-925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rivera-Molina FE: Biochemical and genetic analysis of myosin II function in the trafficking of the chitin synthase III catalytic subunit. PhD Thesis. 2005, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus

    Google Scholar 

  38. Powers T, Walter P: Regulation of ribosome biogenesis by the rapamycin-sensitive TOR-signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 1999, 10 (4): 987-1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kafasla P, Barrass JD, Thompson E, Fromont-Racine M, Jacquier A, Beggs JD, Lewis J: Interaction of yeast eIF4G with spliceosome components: implications in pre-mRNA processing events. RNA Biol. 2009, 6 (5): 563-574. 10.4161/rna.6.5.9861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Watts FZ, Shiels G, Orr E: The yeast MYO1 gene encoding a myosin-like protein required for cell division. EMBO J. 1987, 6 (11): 3499-505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ramirez-Valle F, Braunstein S, Zavadil J, Formenti SC, Schneider RJ: eIF4GI links nutrient sensing by mTOR to cell proliferation and inhibition of autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2008, 181 (2): 293-307. 10.1083/jcb.200710215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hinnebusch AG, Natarajan K: Gcn4p, a master regulator of gene expression, is controlled at multiple levels by diverse signals of starvation and stress. Eukaryot Cell. 2002, 1 (1): 22-32. 10.1128/EC.01.1.22-32.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Dr. Brian C. Rymond for critical reading of this manuscript and providing useful suggestions during the course of this work. We also thank Drs. Brian C. Rymond, Thomas E. Dever, Peter Reid and Roy Parker for their kind contributions of essential reagents and yeast strains. We acknowledge the excellent technical support provided by Lilliam Villanueva-Alicea and Sahily González-Crespo. The project described was supported by Award Number SC1AI081658 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID, NIGMS, or the National Institutes of Health. Partial support for this work was provided through Awards from NCRR-RCMI (G12RR03051) and MBRS-RISE (R25GM061838).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to José R Rodríguez-Medina.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

MER-R carried out microarray experiments, ribosome fractionation, immunoprecipitation, real-time RT-PCR experiments, Western blotting, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. JFR-Q participated in the design of microarray experiments and microarray data analysis. PA contributed to the revision and interpretation of microarray data, comparisons to the published transcriptional and post-transcriptional ESR datasets, and revision of the manuscript. JRR-M conceived the study design, coordinated its execution, carried out data analysis, wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of 25 biological process categories referenced by Osprey: Network Visualization System and used for GSEA in this study. (XLS 20 KB)


Additional file 2:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Positive control experiment conducted with mRNA extracted from eIF4Ep immunoprecipitated protein fractions. Agarose gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products is shown. Experiments yielded positive RT-PCR signals for all the mRNA primer pairs that were tested. (DOC 312 KB)


Additional file 3:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Positive control experiment conducted with equivalent amounts (0.1 μg) of the input total RNA extracted from cell lysates prior to the immunoprecipitation step. Total RNA was amplified by RT-PCR with each primer pair and RT-PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels shown. The results demonstrate positive amplification for all the mRNA primer pairs that were tested. (DOC 39 KB)


Additional file 4:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of post-transcriptionally regulated mRNAs (p≤0.01) in myo1Δ strains divided according to biological process categories. All differentially expressed genes are identified with their corresponding GO annotations, log2-transformed fold change ratios, and p-values. (XLS 303 KB)


Additional file 5:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of co-regulated genes that exhibited regulation in both global expression [6] and post-transcriptional expression studies. These co-regulated genes have been identified with their corresponding GO annotations, log2-transformed fold change ratios, and p-values. (XLS 44 KB)


Additional file 6:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of differentially regulated mRNAs related to cell wall biogenesis in myo1Δ strains at the post-transcriptional level with log2-transformed fold change ratios (p≤ 0.01). (XLS 26 KB)


Additional file 7:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of genes regulated by transcription or degradation [from Supplementary file 1, reference 6] that were regulated ≥ 2-fold (p ≤ 0.01) in myo1Δ and ESR [9]. (XLS 50 KB)


Additional file 8:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of co-regulated genes derived from Supplementary Table S2 that were regulated ≥ 2-fold (p ≤ 0.01) in myo1Δ and ESR [9]. (XLS 40 KB)


Additional file 9:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Significantly regulated ribosome-associated mRNAs (p ≤ 0.01) regulated exclusively by translation in myo1Δ and ESR [10]. (XLS 106 KB)


Additional file 10:Rivera-Ruiz, Rodríguez-Quiñones, Akamine, and Rodríguez-Medina. Table of genes regulated by transcription or degradation ≥ 2-fold (p ≤ 0.01) in myo1Δ and ESR [9] sorted according to biological process and cluster frequency. (XLSX 72 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivera-Ruiz, M.E., Rodríguez-Quiñones, J.F., Akamine, P. et al. Post-transcriptional regulation in the myo1Δ mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11, 690 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: