Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Characterization of a transcriptome from a non-model organism, Cladonia rangiferina, the grey reindeer lichen, using high-throughput next generation sequencing and EST sequence data

BMC Genomics201213:575

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-575

©  Junttila and Rudd; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 2 May 2012
  • Accepted: 11 October 2012
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Lichens are symbiotic organisms that have a remarkable ability to survive in some of the most extreme terrestrial climates on earth. Lichens can endure frequent desiccation and wetting cycles and are able to survive in a dehydrated molecular dormant state for decades at a time. Genetic resources have been established in lichen species for the study of molecular systematics and their taxonomic classification. No lichen species have been characterised yet using genomics and the molecular mechanisms underlying the lichen symbiosis and the fundamentals of desiccation tolerance remain undescribed. We report the characterisation of a transcriptome of the grey reindeer lichen, Cladonia rangiferina, using high-throughput next-generation transcriptome sequencing and traditional Sanger EST sequencing data.

Results

Altogether 243,729 high quality sequence reads were de novo assembled into 16,204 contigs and 49,587 singletons. The genome of origin for the sequences produced was predicted using Eclat with sequences derived from the axenically grown symbiotic partners used as training sequences for the classification model. 62.8% of the sequences were classified as being of fungal origin while the remaining 37.2% were predicted as being of algal origin. The assembled sequences were annotated by BLASTX comparison against a non-redundant protein sequence database with 34.4% of the sequences having a BLAST match. 29.3% of the sequences had a Gene Ontology term match and 27.9% of the sequences had a domain or structural match following an InterPro search. 60 KEGG pathways with more than 10 associated sequences were identified.

Conclusions

Our results present a first transcriptome sequencing and de novo assembly for a lichen species and describe the ongoing molecular processes and the most active pathways in C. rangiferina. This brings a meaningful contribution to publicly available lichen sequence information. These data provide a first glimpse into the molecular nature of the lichen symbiosis and characterise the transcriptional space of this remarkable organism. These data will also enable further studies aimed at deciphering the genetic mechanisms behind lichen desiccation tolerance.

Keywords

  • Non-model organism
  • Cladonia rangiferina
  • Transcriptome sequencing
  • Functional annotation

Background

Lichen is formed through a symbiotic relationship between a fungus and a photosynthetic partner, which can be either an alga or a cyanobacterium [1]. The fungus, or mycobiont, forms a three-dimensional vegetative structure called a thallus, in which the photosynthetic partners, or photobionts, are located. The thallus is a complex and undifferentiated body with upper and lower surfaces of densely aggregated fungal hyphae. The algal (or cyanobacterial) cells are surrounded by fungal hyphae and are maintained beneath the upper cortex. The thallus structure enables gas exchange for the photobiont population and competes for well-illuminated space above the ground [2]. Lichen thalli are not individuals but are instead genetically heterogeneous consortia of an unknown number of participants [2]. It has however been calculated that the algal cells comprise only approximately 7% of the total thallus volume [3].

One-fifth of fungal species form obligate symbiotic associations with green alga or cyanobacteria [4]. This increases to about 46% for ascomycete fungi. The processes of lichenisation and its physiology are therefore relevant to the understanding of ascomycete relationships and the evolution of mechanisms for the control and maintenance of plant-fungal interactions. The number of algal species that can participate within lichenisation processes is less broad. An estimated 100 species from 40 genera have been reported to form lichen symbioses [5].

The molecular nature of the lichen symbiosis remains debated. Some researchers have observed a controlled parasitism of the photobiont by the mycobiont [1]. Others have reported a mutualistic relationship [4]. Regardless of the nature of the relationship, lichens inhabit some of the harshest terrestrial climates on earth, and have demonstrated a capacity to survive even the most challenging environmental extremes of outer space [6]. Most lichen species are tolerant to profound desiccation. This is facilitated by the adoption of an anhydrobiotic state, and in some cases, e.g. Lobaria pulmonaria, morphological adaptations to limit the harmful effects of photoinhibition [7]. The anhydrobiotic state is facilitated through the accumulation of specific metabolites and polysaccharides that limit the damage caused by desiccation and maintain sufficient physiological integrity so that any resulting damage can be repaired upon eventual rewetting [8, 9].

Damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the key threats to surviving anhydrobiosis [10]. The ROS protective mechanisms are not yet characterised, although basic roles for antioxidants in lichen desiccation and rehydration have been demonstrated in a variety of lichen species [9, 11–14]. The accumulation of antioxidant and photo-protective compounds during desiccation plays an important role in the rapid reestablishment of metabolism and photosynthesis following rehydration [15, 16]. A lichen can better tolerate desiccation than either fungus or alga alone since its combined antioxidant and photo-protective mechanisms are more effective than those of the isolated partners [11]. Understanding and characterising the molecular mechanisms that enable lichens to survive years of desiccation, and the approaches to photo-protection and ROS control have potential applied value in the development of innovative strategies for trait improvement in higher plants.

There are many uncharacterised molecular mechanisms that appear specific to lichen, but there are few resources available that can facilitate the genetic characterisation of these processes. Genetic resources have however been established for the systematic study and classification of lichens, reviewed in [5]. These resources are biased to the needs of taxonomists and evolutionary researchers and are not suitable for functional genomics. Research on lichen gene expression is currently limited to a single publication [17] and unpublished data from Messen & Ott, and as yet there is little in the way of either high-throughput genome sequence or expressed sequence tag (EST) data available for any lichen species. As queried on 7th of February 2012, there were 1,864 lichen EST sequences in GenBank. The whole genome sequence of the lichen Xanthoria parietina has been completed but not yet published according to the DOE Joint Genome Institute and a genomic survey of the algal symbiont of the lichen Ramalina farinacea is available in the Short Read Archive of the NCBI.

The emergence of the next generation of DNA sequencing technologies has enabled the transcriptome and genome sequencing of numerous non-model organisms. For non-model organisms, de novo genome assembly of short read data is complicated but many transcriptomes have been sequenced from non-model species and published over the last years [18–22]. The annotation process remains challenging, especially for species with no close relatives with a sequenced reference genome.

Our objective was to generate a lichen transcriptome using both next-generation sequencing and traditional Sanger sequencing. The Roche GS FLX platform was used for the next-generation sequencing. Sanger sequencing was performed to complement the FLX run data with its long sequence reads. We produced additional Sanger EST sequences from axenically grown symbiotic partners (C. rangiferina and Asterochloris sp.) to train classification models for predicting the genome of origin of lichen sequences. We have obtained a basic view of the ongoing molecular processes and have identified the most active biological pathways in C. rangiferina. Our transcriptome data brings an increase to the amount of publicly available lichen sequences and provides a starting point for further studies into lichen functional genomics.

Results

Sequencing and de novo assembly

Lichen transcriptome sequences were generated using both a high-throughput next-generation sequencing technology run and traditional Sanger sequencing from lichen cDNA libraries. The GS FLX run yielded 240,990 sequence reads (55.8 Mbp) and 2,990 EST reads were obtained by Sanger sequencing. The average length of the cDNA sequence reads was 232 bp and 723 bp for GS FLX sequences and Sanger sequences, respectively (Table 1). The majority of the GS FLX reads were shorter than 400 bp (Figure 1A), although the maximum read length was 1,258 bp. After quality and length trimming in the assembly software 243,729 high quality reads were included in the de novo assembly and they were assembled into 16,204 contigs and 49,587 singletons. The GS FLX reads have been submitted to the Short Read Archive [SRA:SRA050676] and the high quality Sanger sequences have been submitted to GenBank [GenBank:JK811361-JK813924 and GenBank:GH717691-GH717859]. A list of the contig and singleton sequences is available as Additional file 1. The length of the contigs varied between 87 and 5,426 bp (Figure 1B). The N50 value of the assembled contigs was 569 bp, and the average length of the contigs was 528 bp (Table 2). 79.7% of the reads were assembled into contigs while 20.3% of the reads remained as singletons. The sequence reads contained within contigs varied between 2 and 1,435 with the average number of reads per contig being 12 (Figure 1C). The coverage of the contigs varied between 1 and 588 with the average coverage being 3.9.
Table 1

The statistics of the reads

 

All reads

GS FLX reads

Sanger reads

No of reads

243 980

240 990

2990

Maximum length

1258

509

1258

Minimum length

5

7

5

Average length

232

232

723

Median length

238

238

715

Figure 1
Figure 1

The statistics of the reads and assembled contigs . A The distribution of the lengths of all sequences obtained from both GS FLX high-throughput sequencing run and traditional Sanger sequencing, B the distribution of contig lengths after de novo assembly, and C the distribution of reads per contig.

Table 2

The statistics of the contigs assembled from the reads

No of contigs

16 204

Maximum length

5426

Minimum length

87

Average length

528

Median length

403

Maximum number of reads

1435

Minimum number of reads

2

Average number of reads

12

Median number of reads

5

N50

569

Annotation and classification of the contigs and singletons

As lichen is a symbiosis of two distinct organisms the genome of origin was predicted for the assembled contigs and singletons to define whether sequences originated from the mycobiont (fungus) or the photobiont (alga) genomes. This classification was performed using Eclat [23]. cDNA sequences produced from axenically grown symbiotic partners (C. rangiferina and Asterochloris sp.) were used to train the required Eclat models to classify and discriminate between the two different genomes. Altogether 1,009 fungal and 854 algal sequences derived from the axenically grown symbiont cDNA libraries were used for the training. The minimum sequence length for the classification was set at 100 bp. 2,829 lichen sequences could not be classified due to their insufficient sequence length. The complete set of contigs and singletons was classified and 62.8% of the sequences were predicted as mycobiont sequences and 37.2% as photobiont sequences (Figure 2, Table 3). When classifying only the contigs, 78.4% were predicted as mycobiont and 21.6% as photobiont. For singleton sequences alone 57.4% mycobiont and 42.6% photobiont sequences, were predicted.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The division of the sequences into fungal and algal origin . The division of the sequences into fungal and algal origin according to Eclat. The results of the Eclat analysis are shown separately for all sequences, contigs and singletons.

Table 3

The division of the sequences into algal and fungal origin by Eclat

 

Photobiont

Mycobiont

All sequences

23 406 (37.2%)

39 551 (62.8%)

Contigs

3492 (21.6%)

12 712 (78.4%)

Singletons

19 914 (42.6%)

26 840 (57.4%)

The sequences were annotated using the Blast2GO software [24]. The contigs and singletons were included in the annotation process. The annotations included best BLASTX match selection, Gene Ontology ID assignment, enzyme code assignments and InterPro domains calculation. BLASTX analysis using the NCBI non-redundant (nr) database revealed that 22,662 sequences (34.4%) had a match in the database with a cut-off value of 1e-10. For the contigs alone, the percentage of sequences with a BLAST result was 57.2%. 73.2% (16,588 sequences) of the sequences had the best BLAST match to a fungal species, while 11.1% (2,520 sequences) had an algal species as the best match (Figure 3). 4.8% (1,095 sequences) had the best match to a plant species, 2.5% (568 sequences) to a bacterium, 2.6% (585 sequences) to a protist, 1% (216 sequences) to an insect, 0.6% (141 sequences) to a lichen, 0.4% (97 sequences) to a mammal and 3.8% (852 sequences) to other. 19,250 sequences (29.3 %) had matches to Gene Ontology (GO) term annotations and 18,324 sequences (27.9 %) had InterPro matches.
Figure 3
Figure 3

The taxonomic distribution of the top BLAST hits . The best BLAST hits for each sequence were divided into nine categories: algae, fungi, plants, bacteria, protist, mammals, insects, lichen and other. The number at the end of the bar indicates the number of sequences.

The GO annotations of the sequences form three core categories; biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF). 22,736 sequences were assigned to biological process, 13,086 to cellular component and 29,170 to molecular function. There were 2,209 unique BP terms, 576 unique CC terms and 1,528 unique MF terms assigned to the sequences. The GO terms with the largest number of assigned sequences in the BP category (Figure 4A) were oxidation reduction (1,833 sequences), RNA metabolic process (1,402 sequences), catabolic process (1,259 sequences), translation (1,234 sequences) and response to stimulus (1,105 sequences). For CC (Figure 4B) the terms with the most sequences were cytoplasmic part (3,490 sequences), intracellular organelle part (2,216 sequences) and nucleus (1,670 sequences). In MF category (Figure 4C) the terms with the most sequences were ATP binding (2,446 sequences), nucleic acid binding (2,425 sequences), oxidoreductase activity (2,234 sequences), protein binding (2,051 sequences) and nucleoside-triphosphatase activity (1,550 sequences). The sequences were also assigned to KEGG pathways (Table 4) and the pathways with the most sequences were purine metabolism (696 sequences), methane metabolism (239 sequences), pyrimidine metabolism (218 sequences), thiamine metabolism (209 sequences) and oxidative phosphorylation (203 sequences). Altogether 60 KEGG pathways were identified and the full pathway list is available as Additional file 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4

GO term distribution of the sequences . GO terms with the most associated sequences for A biological process category, B cellular component category, and C molecular function category. The numbers in the charts indicate the number of sequences associated with the particulate GO term.

Table 4

The top 20 KEGG pathways

Pathway

No of sequences in pathway

No of identified enzymes

Purine metabolism

696

47

Methane metabolism

239

27

Pyrimidine metabolism

218

25

Thiamine metabolism

209

6

Oxidative phosphorylation

203

9

Pyruvate metabolism

194

26

Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis

187

25

Arginine and proline metabolism

182

37

Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

180

21

Propanoate metabolism

167

14

Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes

164

19

Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism

158

27

Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)

156

19

Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism

152

27

Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation

146

18

Fatty acid metabolism

138

17

Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism

132

26

Tryptophan metabolism

128

14

Starch and sucrose metabolism

124

32

Glutathione metabolism

120

16

The top 20 KEGG pathways with the most associated sequences. The full KEGG pathway table is provided as Additional file 2.

Discussion

Lichens are symbiotic organisms consisting of two components; a fungal partner or mycobiont and an algal partner or photobiont. Lichens are remarkable organisms in their ability to tolerate extreme environmental conditions including even outer space [6, 25, 26]. They resume photosynthesis rapidly after even long periods of desiccation [14]. The molecular mechanisms underlying lichen’s survival adaptations are uncharacterised and genomic resources for lichens are limited. To gain a glimpse of the molecular nature of these neglected organisms, we have generated EST sequences from grey reindeer lichen, Cladonia rangiferina, using both high-throughput next-generation sequencing and traditional Sanger sequencing. The sequences were de novo assembled with 79.7% of the reads assembling into contigs, and only 20.3% of the reads remaining as singletons. These values are similar to other non-model organism transcriptome de novo assemblies [27, 28].

As the grey reindeer lichen is a symbiotic organism comprising of two distinct genomes, the Asterochloris genome and the Cladonia rangiferina genome, the sequences were classified to identify their genome of origin, and to obtain an estimate of the ratio of fungal to algal sequences in the lichen transcriptome. More than half of the sequences were classified as fungal sequences, although this varied depending on whether contigs or singletons were classified. The difference between contigs and singletons is in both their length and cis-substantiation suggesting that sequence length affects classification. BLASTX best match taxonomic assignment shows a similar ratio of fungus to alga / plant sequences ratio as the predictive classification performed by Eclat. This suggests that the taxonomic assignment performance is consistent and robust. Although probable non-target sequences, as evidenced by BLASTX analysis, may be present within our sequence collection, the amount of contamination is modest and should not affect the classification. The ratio of the two organisms has been estimated previously with 7% of cells being of algal origin [3]. Similar values were obtained in an analysis of Lobaria pulmonaria protein spectra, where 10% of the spectra were assigned to green algal proteins [29]. Our results suggest a higher percentage of algal transcripts expressed in wetted lichen tissue. Transcript abundance likely correlates most with transcriptional activity and with thallus cell abundance to a lesser level . However, our results appear to confirm the mycobiont as the dominant partner in the symbiosis even in the context of gene expression.

Since no lichen reference genome has yet been published annotation was performed by comparing homologous protein sequences with BLASTX. 57.2% of all assembled contig sequences had a BLAST hit when run against the non-redundant protein sequence database. A considerable fraction of the sequences remain as unidentified and apparently novel sequences. This percentage was considerably lower for the singleton sequences. Similar homology results with lower BLAST match percentages for singletons have been reported for other non-model organism transcriptome de novo assemblies [30]. The numbers are also concordant with those published by Joneson et al. who found a significant homology to 50% of Cladonia grayi sequences in the nr database [17]. Some of the sequences without a BLAST match are likely UTRs, but novel, lichen specific sequences are also likely present in this sequence collection. The cDNA libraries used for sequencing were also un-normalized and therefore there can be a significant redundancy in the ESTs sequenced. In addition, as no reference genome is yet available for any lichen species, the reads were not mapped - this would yield an ideal assignment.

A significant majority of the sequences had either an alga, a fungus, or a lichen species as the best match in the BLAST search (Figure 3). However, only 0.6% of the sequences had the best match to a lichen species, which illustrates the current lack of lichen sequences in the public databases. The largest non-target taxonomic groups were the bacteria (2.5% of sequences), protists (2.6% of sequences), and other (3.8%). Since lichen thalli are also known to contain internal bacterial communities [31], the presence of bacterial sequences from the lichen microbiome is not unexpected.

To decipher the biological meaning of the BLAST annotated sequences, GO and KEGG databases were used for functional annotation, while InterPro search was performed to identify recognisable protein motifs within our sequence collection. Lichens have been found to protect themselves from the damage caused by ROS during desiccation by using antioxidants [11, 32] but the enzymatic antioxidants are also involved in removing ROS produced during normal metabolism [33]. This could be reflected by the GO terms related to oxidation within the most enriched GO terms (Figure 4). Also in the identified KEGG pathways (Table 4, Additional file 2), glutathione metabolism pathway potentially indicates that constitutive protection mechanisms against ROS are active in wetted lichen thallus, as has been previously studied by measuring high amounts of reduced glutathione in undesiccated lichens [9]. These results support the hypothesis that highly-desiccation tolerant lichens rely mainly on constitutive protection mechanisms, which require constant levels of gene expression [33].

Several enriched GO terms and most of the identified KEGG pathways were involved in energy, nucleotide and amino acid metabolisms. These findings are consistent with earlier results, in which spectra assigned to proteins involved in post-translational modifications, energy production and conversion were highly abundant in the mycobiont [29]. The same study found that proteins involved in energy production and conversion strongly dominate the protein fraction of green alga. Similarly, pathways involved in photosynthesis (carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms, porphyrine and chlorophyll metabolism) are among the KEGG pathways with highest amount of sequences in our results.

The carbohydrate produced by the photobiont is leaked and taken up by the mycobiont and consequently converted to arabitol and mannitol through the phosphate pentose pathway [34]. The transport-related enriched GO terms and the pentose phosphate pathway within the identified KEGG pathways potentially indicate that this mechanism is active in the studied lichen thallus. Surprisingly, methane metabolism had the second highest amount of sequences within the KEGG pathways. The sequences associated with this pathway could potentially be novel, lichen-specific sequences, which have a high homology to the proteins associated with methane metabolism, but which are in reality associated with an uncharacterised pathway, e.g. the production of a lichen-specific secondary metabolite. 27.9% of the sequences had a match in the InterPro database, and this suggests that although a reasonable proportion of the sequences contain a number of recognisable protein motifs, there are many unrecognisable sequences, some of which may contain novel protein structures.

Conclusions

We have sequenced the transcriptome of a non-model organism, grey reindeer lichen, through high-throughput next-generation sequencing and traditional Sanger sequencing from cDNA libraries. Lichen is a symbiotic relationship between a fungus and an alga and therefore also the transcriptome is comprised of genes originating from the two distinct genomes. We were able to discern the genome of origin for the lichen sequences by using sequences derived from axenically cultured symbiotic partners as training sequences. Often the bottleneck of analysing sequence material from non-model organisms lies in the annotation process, as no reference genome is available, and also the sequences available in public databases can be almost non-existent. Using information from several different databases we have described here the first de novo assembly and characterization of any lichen transcriptome. The results give a preliminary glimpse into the molecular nature of the lichen symbiosis and the transcriptional space of this resilient organism as we have identified KEGG pathways and GO terms associated with the lichen sequences. These data will also significantly increase the amount of publicly available lichen sequences. We will be exploring the lichen gene expression further in our ongoing research by designing a custom microarray based on these sequence data and comparing the differences in gene expression between differently treated lichen samples. These results are expected to give more insight to lichen desiccation mechanisms and reveal genes involved in the rapid re-establishment of photosynthesis upon hydration.

Methods

Lichen collection, culturing of axenic fungus and alga and their identification

Lichen was collected from the island of Kuusisto, in Kaarina, Finland. It was cleaned and stored in desiccated state at −20 C. Axenic cultures of the symbiotic partners C. rangiferina and Asterochloris sp. were prepared using the modified Yamamoto method [35] and cultured at 21°C. C. rangiferina was cultured on Malt Yeast Extract [35] agar plates and Asterochloris sp. on Organic Nutrient Medium for Trebouxia [36] agar plates. The identity of the cultures was confirmed by sequencing the ITS regions using ITS1F and ITS4 primers for C. rangiferina and ITS1T and ITS4T primers for Asterochloris sp. [37, 38]. The DNA for the sequencing was extracted with Qiagen’s DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The ITS region was amplified using the primers and sequenced with ABI Prism 3130xl Genetic Analyzer capillary DNA sequencer following a BigDye v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, USA) labelling reaction.

RNA extraction

Prior to RNA extraction the lichen tissue was weighed and rewetted with tap water overnight. Fungal and algal tissues were collected off the agar plates. All tissue types were powdered in liquid nitrogen using mortar and pestle. The total RNA extraction was performed as previously described [39], and mRNA was isolated from the total RNA with Nucleo-Trap mRNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany).

EST sequencing

mRNA extracted from lichen thallus and axenically grown fungal and algal symbionts were used to construct phage cDNA libraries using the ZAP-cDNA Gigapack III Gold Cloning (#200450) cDNA library synthesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Size fractionation was achieved using gel electrophoresis. Gel slices corresponding of between 500–1000 bp and 1000–3000 bp in size were excised and gel-purified cDNA was cloned into a phage library. cDNA library clones were sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer capillary DNA sequencer following a BigDye v3.1 labelling reaction.

Next-generation sequencing

The double-stranded cDNA for the next-generation sequencing was prepared using SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Invitrogen’s Oligo dT(12–18) primer was used in the synthesis reaction. The concentration of the cDNA was measured with NanoDrop and altogether 5.12 μg of double-stranded cDNA was used as starting material for the Roche GS FLX sequencing. The high-throughput sequencing was performed at the DNA Sequencing and Genomics Laboratory at the Institute of Biotechnology at University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland according to previously described methods [40]. The cDNA was amplified with Phi29 polymerase (GenomePhi, GE Healthcare, USA) and a single-stranded sequencing library was created according to the FLX instructions. The GS FLX run data were filtered with the GS Run Browser and reads not passing the quality filters were removed from the data.

Bioinformatic analyses

The sequences were de novo assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench software version 4.9 (CLCBio, Denmark). Prior to the assembly the sequences were trimmed in the CLC Genomics Workbench. All of the sequences were trimmed using quality scores with a limit of 0.05, in addition the adapter sequences potentially present at either end of the GS FLX sequences were removed, and the Sanger sequences were compared against the NCBI UniVec database to remove vector and polylinker sequences. Sequences shorter than 15bp were removed from the analysis. In the de novo assembly the minimum contig length was set to 250 bp and voting method was chosen as the conflict resolution parameter. The reads were then mapped back to the contigs. The N50 value of the assembly was calculated by summarizing the lengths of the biggest contigs until 50% of the total contig length was reached. The minimum contig length in this set is the number that was used to report the N50 value of the de novo assembly.

Eclat [23] was used to identify the genome of origin for the contigs and singletons derived from lichen tissue. The Sanger sequences obtained from the axenically grown algal and fungal symbiont cDNA libraries were used to train Eclat and build a model file for the classification. Base calling for the sequences used in Eclat training was performed using Phred [41] and the training sequences were compared against a modified NCBI UniVec database using cross_match to identify vector and polylinker sequence substrings prior to use in Eclat. The minimum sequence length for classification was set at 100 bp.

Blast2GO [24] tool was used for BLASTX, GO term and enzyme code annotation, Interpro scans and KEGG pathway analysis of the contigs and singletons. BLASTX [42] was used to compare the assembled contigs and singletons to a non-redundant (nr) protein sequence database from the NCBI GenBank database [43]. BLASTX matches were filtered using an arbitrary cut-off of 1e-10. Combined graphs were produced from the GO annotation results and the most enriched GO terms were visualized in multilevel format. GO terms with less than 1,000 sequence matches were not included in the analysis. Interpro scan was performed against all of the available InterPro databases. KEGG pathway information was retrieved based on the enzyme code annotation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Janne Isojärvi and Andras Kiraly for technical assistance with the bioinformatic analyses and Asta Laiho and Attila Gyenesei for helpful comments on the manuscript. The work was funded by the Academy of Finland grant (project number FI-2960501) to SR.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Tykistökatu 6, 20520 Turku, Finland

References

  1. Ahmadjian V: The lichen symbiosis. 1993, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Honegger R: Functional-Aspects of the Lichen Symbiosis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1991, 42: 553-578. 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.003005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins CR, Farrar JF: Structural resistance to mass transfer in the lichen Xanthoria parietina. New Phytol. 1978, 81: 71-83. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01605.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN: Dictionary of the fungi. 1995, Wallingford: CABGoogle Scholar
  5. DePriest PT: Early molecular investigations of lichen-forming symbionts: 1986–2001. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2004, 58: 273-301. 10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sancho L, de la Torre R, Horneck G, Ascaso C, de Los Rios A, Pintado A, Wierzchos J, Schuster M: Lichens survive in space: results from the 2005 LICHENS experiment. Astrobiology. 2007, 7: 443-454. 10.1089/ast.2006.0046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartak M, Solhaug KA, Vrablikova H, Gauslaa Y: Curling during desiccation protects the foliose lichen Lobaria pulmonaria against photoinhibition. Oecologia. 2006, 149: 553-60. 10.1007/s00442-006-0476-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Huneck S: The significance of lichens and their metabolites. Naturwissenschaften. 1999, 86: 559-570. 10.1007/s001140050676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kranner I: Glutathione status correlates with different degrees of desiccation tolerance in three lichens. New Phytol. 2002, 154: 451-460. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00376.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rothschild LJ, Mancinelli RL: Life in extreme environments. Nature. 2001, 409: 1092-1101. 10.1038/35059215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kranner I, Cram WJ, Zorn M, Wornik S, Yoshimura I, Stabentheiner E, Pfeifhofer HW: Antioxidants and photoprotection in a lichen as compared with its isolated symbiotic partners. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 3141-3146. 10.1073/pnas.0407716102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartak M, Hajek J, Gloser J: Heterogeneity of chlorophyll fluorescence over thalli of several foliose macrolichens exposed to adverse environmental factors: interspecific differences as related to thallus hydration and high irradiance. Photosynthetica. 2000, 38: 531-537. 10.1023/A:1012405306648.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Heber U: Photoprotection of green plants: a mechanism of ultra-fast thermal energy dissipation in desiccated lichens. Planta. 2008, 228: 641-650. 10.1007/s00425-008-0766-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aubert S, Juge C, Boisson AM, Gout E, Bligny R: Metabolic processes sustaining the reviviscence of lichen Xanthoria elegans (Link) in high mountain environments. Planta. 2007, 226: 1287-97. 10.1007/s00425-007-0563-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kranner I, Zorn M, Turk B, Wornik S, Beckett RR, Batic F: Biochemical traits of lichens differing in relative desiccation tolerance. New Phytol. 2003, 160: 167-176. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00852.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlensog M, Pannewitz S, Green TGA, Schroeter B: Metabolic recovery of continental antarctic cryptogams after winter. Polar Biol. 2004, 27: 399-408. 10.1007/s00300-004-0606-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Joneson S: Armaleo D. 2010, Lutzoni FM: Fungal and algal gene expression in early developmental stages of lichen-symbiosis. MycologiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Vera JC, Wheat CW, Fescemyer HW, Frilander MJ, Crawford DL, Hanski I, Marden JH: Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol Ecol. 2008, 17: 1636-1647. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03666.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Novaes E, Drost D, Farmerie W, Pappas GJ, Grattapaglia D, Sederoff R, Kirst M: High-throughput gene and SNP discovery in Eucalyptus grandis, an uncharacterized genome. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 312-10.1186/1471-2164-9-312.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Alagna F, D’Agostino N, Torchia L, Servili M, Rao R, Pietrella M, Giuliano G, Chiusano M, Baldoni L, Perrotta G: Comparative 454 pyrosequencing of transcripts from two olive genotypes during fruit development. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 399-10.1186/1471-2164-10-399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Collins L, Biggs P, Voelckel C, Joly S: An approach to transcriptome analysis of non-model organisms using short-read sequences. Genome Inform. 2008, 21: 3-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang W, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Qi Y, Guo D: Global characterization of Artemisia annua glandular trichome transcriptome using 454 pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 465-10.1186/1471-2164-10-465.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedel CC, Jahn KH, Sommer S, Rudd S, Mewes HW, Tetko IV: Support vector machines for separation of mixed plant-pathogen EST collections based on codon usage. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 1383-1388. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M: Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 3674-3676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Onofri S, de la Torre R, de Vera JP, Ott S, Zucconi L, Selbmann L, Scalzi G, Venkateswaran KJ, Rabbow E, Sánchez Iñigo FJ, Horneck G: Survival of rock-colonizing organisms after 1.5 years in outer space. Astrobiology. 2012, 12: 508-516. 10.1089/ast.2011.0736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. de la Torre R, Sancho L, Horneck G, de los Rios A, Wierzchos J, Olsson-Francis K, Cockell C, Rettberg P, Berger T, de Vera J, et al: Survival of lichens and bacteria exposed to outer space conditions - Results of the Lithopanspermia experiments. Icarus. 2010, 208: 735-748. 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.03.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Y, Luo H, Li Y, Sun C, Song J, Niu Y, Zhu Y, Dong L, Lv A, Tramontano E, Chen S: Pyrosequencing of the Camptotheca acuminata transcriptome reveals putative genes involved in camptothecin biosynthesis and transport. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 533-10.1186/1471-2164-12-533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sui C, Zhang J, Wei J, Chen S, Li Y, Xu J, Jin Y, Xie C, Gao Z, Chen H, et al: Transcriptome analysis of Bupleurum chinense focusing on genes involved in the biosynthesis of saikosaponins. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 539-10.1186/1471-2164-12-539.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider T, Schmid E, de Castro JV, Cardinale M, Eberl L, Grube M, Berg G, Riedel K: Structure and function of the symbiosis partners of the lung lichen (Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm.) analyzed by metaproteomics. Proteomics. 2011, 11: 2752-2756. 10.1002/pmic.201000679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hsiao YY, Chen YW, Huang SC, Pan ZJ, Fu CH, Chen WH, Tsai WC, Chen HH: Gene discovery using next-generation pyrosequencing to develop ESTs for Phalaenopsis orchids. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 360-10.1186/1471-2164-12-360.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bates ST, Cropsey GW, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N: Bacterial communities associated with the lichen symbiosis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011, 77: 1309-1314. 10.1128/AEM.02257-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Weissman L, Garty J, Hochman A: Characterization of enzymatic antioxidants in the lichen Ramalina lacera and their response to rehydration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 6508-6514. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6508-6514.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kranner I, Beckett R, Hochman A, Nash T: Desiccation-tolerance in lichens: a review. Bryologist. 2008, 111: 576-593. 10.1639/0007-2745-111.4.576.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lines C, Ratcliffe R, Rees T, Southon T: A C-13 nmr-study of photosynthate transport and metabolism in the lichen xanthoria-calcicola oxner. New Phytologist. 1989, 111: 447-456. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb00707.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamamoto Y: Studies of cell aggregates and the production of natural pigments in plant cell culture. 1990, Osaka: Nippon Paint PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  36. Ahmadjian V: A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: Isolation, culture, cultural physiology, and identification. Phycologia. 1967, 6: 127-160. 10.2216/i0031-8884-6-2-127.1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gardes M, Bruns T: ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes–application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993, 2: 113-118. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SB, Taylor JW: Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. 1990, San Diego: Academic PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Junttila S, Lim K-J, Rudd S: Optimization and comparison of different methods for RNA extraction for cDNA library construction from the reindeer lichen Cladonia rangiferina. BMC Research Notes. 2009, 2: 204-10.1186/1756-0500-2-204.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman W, Attiya S, Bader J, Bemben L, Berka J, Braverman M, Chen Y, Chen Z, et al: Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005, 437: 376-380.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 175-185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D25-30. 10.1093/nar/gkn320.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Junttila and Rudd; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us