- Methodology article
- Open Access
Highly sensitive amplicon-based transcript quantification by semiconductor sequencing
© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 24 April 2014
- Accepted: 1 July 2014
- Published: 5 July 2014
In clinical and basic research custom panels for transcript profiling are gaining importance because only project specific informative genes are interrogated. This approach reduces costs and complexity of data analysis and allows multiplexing of samples. Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) based TaqMan assays have high sensitivity but suffer from a limited dynamic range and sample throughput. Hence, there is a gap for a technology able to measure expression of large gene sets in multiple samples.
We have adapted a commercially available mRNA quantification assay (AmpliSeq-RNA) that measures mRNA abundance based on the frequency of PCR amplicons determined by high-throughput semiconductor sequencing. This approach allows for parallel, accurate quantification of about 1000 transcripts in multiple samples covering a dynamic range of five orders of magnitude. Using samples derived from a well-characterized stem cell differentiation model, we obtained a good correlation (r = 0.78) of transcript levels measured by AmpliSeq-RNA and DNA-microarrays. A significant portion of low abundant transcripts escapes detection by microarrays due to limited sensitivity. Standard quantitative RNA sequencing of the same samples confirms expression of low abundant genes with an overall correlation coefficient of r = 0.87. Based on digital AmpliSeq-RNA imaging we show switches of signaling cascades at four time points during differentiation of stem cells into cardiomyocytes.
The AmpliSeq-RNA technology adapted to high-throughput semiconductor sequencing allows robust transcript quantification based on amplicon frequency. Multiplexing of at least 900 parallel PCR reactions is feasible because sequencing-based quantification eliminates artefacts coming from off-target amplification. Using this approach, RNA quantification and detection of genetic variations can be performed in the same experiment.
- Semiconductor RNA sequencing
- Digital transcript imaging
- Multiplex analysis
Personal healthcare has the goal to deliver specific targeted therapeutics to patient groups stratified based on predictive genetic or transcriptional markers. The availability of several hundred complete human genomes in the public domain has added a high degree of confidence to genetic markers predicting susceptibility to certain disorders. Robust and validated PCR-based assays interrogating disease specific single-nucleotide-polymorphisms (SNP) panels are routinely used in exploratory and clinical research using formalin fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) or biopsy derived DNA samples. The de novo discovery of dynamic mRNA biomarkers that inform about drug response or specific gene expression patterns is regularly done by genome-wide transcript profiling using DNA microarrays or quantitative RNA sequencing. However, both technologies require relatively high amounts of high quality RNA complicating genome-wide transcript profiling of clinical samples.
For translational research novel primary cell based tissue models are emerging. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology allows in vitro generation of tissue specific human cells such as cardiomyocytes. In addition, spherocyte based three-dimensional culture systems allow small-scale engineering of human tissues containing cell types present in the native tissue. In contrast to patient derived tissues these in vitro models can be exposed to drugs at various dose-levels and multiple time-points in a well-controlled laboratory environment. The main purpose of such primary cell based in vitro systems is analysis of drug-responses using a variety of dynamic parameters such as transcript levels. Differentially expressed transcripts found in 3D-cultures, human primary cells or clinical samples are useful resources for generation of customized assays interrogating expression of disease relevant genes only. The microfluidics based quantitative PCR (qPCR) platform (“Fluidigm”) allows multiparallel expression analysis of 96 custom transcripts in 96 samples at high sensitivity with low RNA input . The Luminex system is a multiplexed color-coded microsphere-based suspension platform for digital quantification of up to 100 custom transcripts in a single tube . The Nanostring technology uses complementary probes coupled with large color-coded DNA molecules to label transcripts followed by confocal microscope-based digital quantification at single molecule sensitivity . Alternatively, oligonucleotide probe coated cantilever arrays have been used to quantify transcripts in cell lysates based on nano-mechanical bending . The production of custom microarrays was discontinued by most suppliers due to high costs and declining market size. For routine applications, qPCR profiling (Taqman assay) is the method of choice because it is performed in conventional 96-well plates using standard thermocyclers . In addition, custom gene qPCR panels covering various major biological processes such as apoptosis, cell cycle control or immune stimulation are commercially available from a number of vendors. All technologies briefly outlined above suffer either from low sample throughput or else from a rather limited number of transcripts for multiparallel analysis.
Recently a combination of PCR amplification and semiconductor sequencing termed AmpliSeq became commercially available for customized detection of sequence based single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or point mutations . Compared to standard PCR assays this technology provides the sequence flanking the mutation of interest at high coverage permitting quantitative determination of allele frequencies. For cancer research for instance, a commercial panel of 190 primer pairs covering hot-spot mutations in 46 cancer-related genes is available for low-throughput semiconductor sequencers [7, 8]. This gene panel was used in a pilot study for AmpliSeq validation using clinical (FFPE) lung cancer samples [9–11]. The amplicon size of 80 to 100 base pairs is compatible with partially degraded material which is very challenging to sequence by classical DNA sequencing methods such as Sanger-sequencing. All clinical FFPE samples were successfully amplified and sequenced with 10ng DNA input. The allele frequencies determined by Sanger-sequencing were confirmed by AmpliSeq technology . Therefore it is likely that focused parallel sequencing will gain attention in clinical studies and for patient stratification.
Here we present the first AmpliSeq-based RNA quantification (AmpliSeq-RNA) in multiple samples using a custom panel of 917 individual amplicons quantified by high-throughput Ion-Torrent-Proton semiconductor sequencing . For validation, we have chosen RNA samples derived from four time points of a published cardiomyocyte differentiation experiment as a well-characterized biological system . Expression values measured by AmpliSeq-RNA data correlate well with equivalent microarray data or conventional quantitative RNA sequencing. Adaptation of AmpliSeq-RNA technology to high-performance semiconductor technology closes an important gap in custom RNA analysis because it allows for the first time multi-parallel expression analysis of hundreds of genes in up to one hundred samples covering a dynamic range of five orders of magnitude.
Workflow of AmpliSeq-based digital transcript imaging (AmpliSeq-RNA)
In addition, we adapted the AmpliSeq-RNA technology to the high-throughput Ion-Torrent Proton semiconductor sequencer which generates about 100-times more reads than the Personal Genome Sequencer (PGM) originally used. This expansion of capacity allows adaptation to the experimental needs by either adjusting the dynamic range or the number of samples. In the current study, the pooled samples coming from biological triplicates of four time-points (day 0, day, 10, day 20, day 60) were sequenced in parallel on a single chip. We obtained in average 16’362’403, 11’145’049, 15’951’406 and 12’467’509 mapped reads for day 0, day 10, day 20 and day 60 respectively. The most abundant amplicons of our panel are represented by up to 800’000 reads exceeding the needs of most profiling experiments. We have set the lower detection limit to an average of five reads per amplicon in order to reduce artefacts known as the “Monte Carlo effect” caused by stochastic single molecule amplification at low input RNA levels .
Technical and biological validation of AmpliSeq-RNA
To keep this technology-focused study in a manageable scope we selected triplicate RNA samples from day 0, 10, 20 and 60 of our published iPSC differentiation experiment for AmpliSeq-RNA validation. To confirm integrity of the reference samples we have repeated the published microarray profiling analysis . Prior to the biological evaluation we assessed technical variation of the AmpliSeq-RNA technology adapted to Proton-sequencing. We selected a single RNA sample (day 60) and prepared four independent sequencing libraries using 25 nanogram input RNA per technical replicate. Following sequencing and transcript quantification we calculated a common coefficient of variation of 0.16 (defined as sigma/mean) for AmpliSeq-RNA. The observed inter-sample variation is in the range of established RNA profiling technologies such as qPCR (1% ~ 15%; [16, 17]) microarray (5% ~ 15%; ) or quantitative RNA sequencing (10% ~ 15%; ).
Comparison of AmpliSeq-RNA gene expression with microarrays and quantitative RNA-sequencing
Biological significance of AmpliSeq-RNA data
Specificity of AmpliSeq-RNA: Number of undetected amplicons at each time point
The current trend to study subsets of genes rather than genome-wide gene expression requires appropriate technologies. Apart from significant cost-reduction, data interpretation is less complicated and more conclusive due to focus on relevant data points. The current version of the microfluidics based Fluidigm technology  measures expression of 96 custom genes in 96 samples by qPCR. Despite high sensitivity, throughput and dynamic range are suboptimal. In addition, a significant hardware investment is involved. Standard quantitative RNA sequencing comes with single molecule sensitivity and a dynamic range of at least five orders of magnitude depending on instrument platform and multiplexing. High-throughput sample processing is currently restricted by the largely manual workflow of most platforms, expenses and lavish data processing. We argue that AmpliSeq-RNA can potentially close these gaps. We demonstrate parallel amplification of 917 transcripts in a single tube with comparable efficiency which we consider sufficient for most biological and medical research applications. We performed parallel sequencing of 12 barcoded samples to explore the full dynamic range of the Proton-technology delivering about 12 million reads per sample under optimal conditions. For most applications, a profile based on 1 million reads per sample is sufficient for discovery of significant biological processes. Such a high-level analysis allows multiparallel analysis of up to 150 samples in a single run. The short three-hour run time of Proton sequencers permits completion of two experiments per day within normal working hours. The low amount of input RNA ranging from 500 picogram to 5 nanogram allows analysis of biopsy derived tissue samples and the small amplicon size of 100 base pairs is compatible with partially degraded FFPE-tissue . The steadily increasing acceptance of human primary- or iPSC derived three-dimensional in vitro tissue models as surrogate for clinical responses is another area where only small amounts of RNA are available from spheroid body cultures. Apart from multiplexing options with respect to sample number and analysis content, we consider sequence based quantification as an important feature of AmpliSeq-RNA. Pooling of up to 1’000 primer pairs will likely result in off-target amplification which cannot be detected by fluorescence based detection methods. In fact, we found experimentally that about 3% of all reads do not map to the amplicon sequence pool probably due to unspecific off-target amplification. In contrast to conventional RNA sequencing that employs genomic read mapping, AmpliSeq-RNA considers only reads matching the correct target sequence for quantification resulting in elimination of off-target born amplicons. Defining the number of mismatches in the sequences used for mapping allows detection of genetic variations such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and point mutations in the transcript provided the amplicon covers such polymorphic stretches. Along the same lines, targeting of conserved sequence stretches flanking polymorphic regions in closely related homologs of gene families allows quantification of each transcript variant. Finally, we expect that amplicon based mRNA quantification can be performed on any deep sequencing instrument with sufficient data output. However, semiconductor sequencing is by far the fastest method with three hours run time and automated read quantification on the Ion-Torrent system server.
We have compiled a panel of 917 transcripts derived from more than 100 human signaling cascades and signaling networks. These were submitted via web interface for primer design and probe pool synthesis using proprietary algorithms (https://www.ampliseq.com/browse.action). For data analysis, a canonical sequence reference file and a plug-in for the Ion-Torrent server are provided by the supplier of the PCR-primer pool (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA).
Samples for validation
We have previously analyzed transcriptional changes during differentiation from human iPSCs to beating cardiomyocytes at multiple time points . The human cells were of commercial origin and are not subject to ethical committee approval. We selected triplicate RNA samples from day 0, 10, 20 and 60 for analysis to confirm transcriptional changes measured by whole genome microarray analysis as reference and check for sample integrity according to the published protocol using the same microarray platform (HumanHT-12 v4.0 Beadchip, Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA).
Amplicon library construction
10 ng of total RNA from each time point and biological replicate were reverse transcribed to cDNA by poly-A-priming followed by PCR pre-amplification (15 cycles) according to the protocol supplied with the Ion AmpliSeq™ RNA Library Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA, Catalog number 4482335). After primer digestion, adapters and molecular barcodes were ligated to the amplicons followed by magnetic bead purification. This library was amplified, purified and stored at -20°C. Amplicon size and DNA concentration were measured using an Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation.
5 picomoles of each of the 12 samples (4 time points; 3 biological replicates) were barcoded and pooled for emulsion PCR (ePCR) on Ion Sphere Particles (ISPs) using the Ion PI Template OT2 200 Kit v3 using the Ion OneTouch 2 Instrument. Following automated Ion OneTouch ES enrichment of template-positive ISPs samples were loaded on an Ion Proton PI chip v2 and sequenced on an Ion Proton instrument using the Ion PI sequencing 200 kit v3 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA).
Quantitative RNA sequencing
The same samples as above were sequenced using commercial kits and protocols provided by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA. Briefly, 1.5 μg of total RNA was used to construct the strand-specific mRNA-Seq libraries using the SENSE mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen, Vienna, Austria). Template preparation and Proton sequencing was done according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA).
Read mapping and quantification
Reads were mapped and quantified using the program TMAP (Torrent Mapping Alignment Program; http://mendel.iontorrent.com/ion-docs/Technical-Note---TMAP-Alignment_9012907.html) which is based on different alignment algorithms [29–32]. The program runs automatically on the Ion-Torrent Server following completion of sequencing. Reads are mapped to the amplicon sequences of the panel resulting in fast data processing, quantification with concomitant elimination of unspecific amplicons (typically ~3% of all reads).
Detection of differentially expressed genes
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from microarray data based on linear models using the limma package in Bionconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org). We applied three data modelling approaches to AmpliSeq-RNA with increasing complexities: 1) log2 transformation (adding an epsilon of 1E-3 to all read counts) 2) voom (limma package) modelling of mean-variance relationship and 3) edgeR based on negative binomial distribution . Differential gene expression values determined by three approaches are virtually identical (R2 > 0.99).
The gene expression raw data are deposited in the GEO database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/;Accession number: GSE58737).
All authors are financed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and the project did not receive external funding.
We thank Dr Roland Schmucki for RNA-sequencing data processing and gene expression analysis. We are grateful to Drs Leo Altenburger and Andreas Dieckmann for proof-reading. Special thanks go to Dr Laurent Essioux for stimulating discussions and to Dr Thomas Singer for project support.
- Zimmermann BG, Grill S, Holzgreve W, Zhong XY, Jackson LG, Hahn S: Digital PCR: a powerful new tool for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis?. Prenat Diagn. 2008, 28 (12): 1087-1093.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar SA: Applications of Luminex xMAP technology for rapid, high-throughput multiplexed nucleic acid detection. Clin Chimica Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2006, 363 (1-2): 71-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reis PP, Waldron L, Goswami RS, Xu W, Xuan Y, Perez-Ordonez B, Gullane P, Irish J, Jurisica I, Kamel-Reid S: mRNA transcript quantification in archival samples using multiplexed, color-coded probes. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11: 46-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Lang HP, Huber F, Bietsch A, Grange W, Certa U, McKendry R, Guntherodt HJ, Hegner M, Gerber C: Rapid and label-free nanomechanical detection of biomarker transcripts in human RNA. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006, 1 (3): 214-220.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, Gelfand DH: Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5'––3' exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991, 88 (16): 7276-7280.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Millat G, Chanavat V, Rousson R: Evaluation of a New High-Throughput Next-Generation Sequencing Method Based on a Custom AmpliSeq Library and Ion Torrent PGM Sequencing for the Rapid Detection of Genetic Variations in Long QT Syndrome. Mol Diagn Therapy. 2014, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Roy S, Durso MB, Nikiforov YE: Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013, 98 (11): E1852-E1860.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simbolo M, Gottardi M, Corbo V, Fassan M, Mafficini A, Malpeli G, Lawlor RT, Scarpa A: DNA qualification workflow for next generation sequencing of histopathological samples. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (6): e62692-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beadling C, Neff TL, Heinrich MC, Rhodes K, Thornton M, Leamon J, Andersen M, Corless CL: Combining highly multiplexed PCR with semiconductor-based sequencing for rapid cancer genotyping. J Mol Diagn. 2013, 15 (2): 171-176.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ, Reddy NG, Barkoh BA, Handal B, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Greaves WO, Medeiros LJ, Aldape KD, Luthra R: Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn. 2013, 15 (5): 607-622.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang L, Huang J, Morehouse C, Zhu W, Korolevich S, Sui D, Ge X, Lehmann K, Liu Z, Kiefer C, Czapiga M, Su X, Brohawn P, Gu Y, Higgs BW, Yao Y: Low frequency KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer patients and the presence of multiple mutations in oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Genet. 2013, 206 (9–10): 330-339.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endris V, Penzel R, Warth A, Muckenhuber A, Schirmacher P, Stenzinger A, Weichert W: Molecular diagnostic profiling of lung cancer specimens with a semiconductor-based massive parallel sequencing approach: feasibility, costs, and performance compared with conventional sequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2013, 15 (6): 765-775.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merriman B, Rothberg JM: Progress in ion torrent semiconductor chip based sequencing. Electrophoresis. 2012, 33 (23): 3397-3417.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Babiarz JE, Ravon M, Sridhar S, Ravindran P, Swanson B, Bitter H, Weiser T, Chiao E, Certa U, Kolaja KL: Determination of the human cardiomyocyte mRNA and miRNA differentiation network by fine-scale profiling. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21 (11): 1956-1965.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karrer EE, Lincoln JE, Hogenhout S, Bennett AB, Bostock RM, Martineau B, Lucas WJ, Gilchrist DG, Alexander D: In situ isolation of mRNA from individual plant cells: creation of cell-specific cDNA libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92 (9): 3814-3818.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmittgen TD, Zakrajsek BA, Mills AG, Gorn V, Singer MJ, Reed MW: Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay: comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Anal Biochem. 2000, 285 (2): 194-204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlen Y, McNair A, Perseguers S, Mazza C, Mermod N: Statistical significance of quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8: 131-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, Baker SC, Collins PJ, de Longueville F, Kawasaki ES, Lee KY, Luo Y, Sun YA, Willey JC, Setterquist RA, Fischer GM, Tong W, Dragan YP, Dix DJ, Frueh FW, Goodsaid FM, Herman D, Jensen RV, Johnson CD, Lobenhofer EK, Puri RK, Schrf U, Thierry-Mieg J, Wang C, Wilson M, Wolber PK, et al: The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol. 2006, 24 (9): 1151-1161.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y: RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res. 2008, 18 (9): 1509-1517.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan JB, Gunderson KL, Bibikova M, Yeakley JM, Chen J, Wickham Garcia E, Lebruska LL, Laurent M, Shen R, Barker D: Illumina universal bead arrays. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 410: 57-73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008, 5 (7): 621-628.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Augello MA, Hickey TE, Knudsen KE: FOXA1: master of steroid receptor function in cancer. EMBO J. 2011, 30 (19): 3885-3894.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Tang N, Hadden TJ, Rishi AK: Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011, 1813 (11): 1978-1986.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sawa T, Ihara H, Ida T, Fujii S, Nishida M, Akaike T: Formation, signaling functions, and metabolisms of nitrated cyclic nucleotide. Nitric Oxide. 2013, 34: 10-18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zarubin T, Han J: Activation and signaling of the p38 MAP kinase pathway. Cell Res. 2005, 15 (1): 11-18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campbell SL, Khosravi Far R, Rossman KL, Clark GJ, Der CJ: Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene. 1998, 17 (11 Reviews): 1395-1413.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dhanasekaran DN, Reddy EP: JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008, 27 (48): 6245-6251.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katoh M: WNT signaling pathway and stem cell signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (14): 4042-4045.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H: Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assembly. Bioinform (Oxford Engl). 2012, 28 (14): 1838-1844.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinform (Oxford Engl). 2009, 25 (14): 1754-1760.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Durbin R: Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinform (Oxford Engl). 2010, 26 (5): 589-595.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ning Z, Cox AJ, Mullikin JC: SSAHA: a fast search method for large DNA databases. Genome Res. 2001, 11 (10): 1725-1729.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK: edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinform (Oxford Engl). 2010, 26 (1): 139-140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.