Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Shigella flexneri 5b and comparison with Shigella flexneri 2a

  • †1, 2,
  • †2,
  • †2,
  • †2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2, 4Email author
†Contributed equally
BMC Genomics20067:173

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-173

©  Nie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

  • Received: 28 February 2006
  • Accepted: 06 July 2006
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Shigella bacteria cause dysentery, which remains a significant threat to public health. Shigella flexneri is the most common species in both developing and developed countries. Five Shigella genomes have been sequenced, revealing dynamic and diverse features. To investigate the intra-species diversity of S. flexneri genomes further, we have sequenced the complete genome of S. flexneri 5b strain 8401 (abbreviated Sf8401) and compared it with S. flexneri 2a (Sf301).

Results

The Sf8401 chromosome is 4.5-Mb in size, a little smaller than that of Sf301, mainly because the former lacks the SHI-1 pathogenicity island (PAI). Compared with Sf301, there are 6 inversions and one translocation in Sf8401, which are probably mediated by insertion sequences (IS). There are clear differences in the known PAIs between these two genomes. The bacteriophage SfV segment remaining in SHI-O of Sf8401 is clearly larger than the remnants of bacteriophage SfII in Sf301. SHI-1 is absent from Sf8401 but a specific related protein is found next to the pheV locus. SHI-2 is involved in one intra-replichore inversion near the origin of replication, which may change the expression of iut/iuc genes. Moreover, genes related to the glycine-betaine biosynthesis pathway are present only in Sf8401 among the known Shigella genomes.

Conclusion

Our data show that the two S. flexneri genomes are very similar, which suggests a high level of structural and functional conservation between the two serotypes. The differences reflect different selection pressures during evolution. The ancestor of S. flexneri probably acquired SHI-1 and SHI-2 before SHI-O was integrated and the serotypes diverged. SHI-1 was subsequently deleted from the S. flexneri 5b genome by recombination, but stabilized in the S. flexneri 2a genome. These events may have contributed to the differences in pathogenicity and epidemicity between the two serotypes of S. flexneri.

Keywords

  • Insertion Sequence
  • Shigellosis
  • Pathogenicity Island
  • Virulence Plasmid
  • Shigella Strain

Background

Shigella species that cause bacillary dysentery or shigellosis are Gram-negative, non-sporulating, facultative anaerobes, and the disease remains a major worldwide health problem. An estimated annual infection of 160 million individuals, with 1.1 million deaths, most of them children under 5 years old in developing countries, occurs with shigellosis [1]. The poor sanitary conditions prevalent in these areas contribute to the spread of the bacteria, and the expense of antibiotics and increasing antibiotic resistance complicate treatment [2].

Shigella was recognized as the etiological agent of bacillary dysentery in the 1890s. It was adopted as a genus in the 1950s and sub-divided into 4 species: S. dysenteriae, S. flexneri, S. boydii and S. sonnei [3]. According to this taxonomy,S. flexneri is classified into 6 serotypes (including 13 subtypes). Most previous work on the molecular pathogenesis of Shigella has been carried out in S. flexneri serotypes 2a and 5.

In China, S. flexneri 2a is a hyperendemic species and is responsible for approximately 50–70% of >10 million cases per year, most of them associated with epidemic and pandemic shigellosis [4]. Shigella pathologically invades the intestinal epithelial cells, resulting in an intense inflammatory reaction characterized by abscess formation and ulceration. All Shigella strains contain a large virulence plasmid that is known to encode genes necessary and sufficient for invasion [5]. The virulence plasmid from S. flexneri serotype 2a diverges slightly from serotype 5a [5], but the epidemicities of the two serotypes differ markedly. Chromosomal genes present in "pathogenicity islands" usually participate in the pathogenic process directly, or contribute to survival in the host environments during infection [6–10], and the expression of virulence depends on a complex regulation mechanism that involves dialog between the chromosome and the virulence plasmid [11].

We and others have previously sequenced two genomes of the most prevalent species S. flexneri 2a (strains Sf301 and 2457T) and also completed the genomes from the other three species of Shigella [12–14]. All these genomes show that the extensive diversity of Shigella is perhaps attributable to the fact that the bacteria evolved from different strains of E. coli and became highly specific human pathogens through convergent evolution. A better understanding of the intra-species diversity of Shigella requires the availability of more whole genome sequences.

We present here the complete genome sequence of S. flexneri 5b Sf8401 and a comparison with the S. flexneri 2a Sf301 genome, which reveals differences in the pathogenicity islands and chromosomal rearrangements between different serotypes of this species. The comparison will facilitate understanding of the common biological processes required for infection and identify unique properties that may differentiate between them in respect of epidemicity and pathogenicity, even if the virulence plasmid is closely similar. Moreover, the comparison will provide some insight into how these pathogens have evolved.

Results and discussion

General features

In common with other reported Shigella strains, the genome of Sf8401 contains a circular chromosome. Since the complete sequences of pWR501 and pWR100 are known [15, 16], we present here only the chromosome sequence, which is 4,574,284 bp in length with an average GC content of 50.92% and encodes 97 tRNA genes (Table 1, Additional file 1). Its size is a little smaller than that of Sf301, mainly because SHI-1 is absent (see below). Sf8401 has 7 rRNA operons, with 4 copies in one replichore and 3 in the other, while Sf301 has 5 copies in one replichore and 2 in the other. These result from one intra-replichore inversion near the replication origin (Fig. 1). Comparison of Sf8401 with Sf301 reveals that more than 97% of the genome sequence is shared between the two strains. The architecture of the Sf8401 genome is similar to Sf301 but the overall colinearity is broken by 7 translocations and inversions involving DNA segments >5 kb (Fig. 1). Among the 4194 proteomes of MG1655, 3098 proteins (74%) are shared by Sf8401 and Sf301 and may be regarded as the "backbone" of S. flexneri (Additional file 2), while 114 are pseudogenes in both genomes. Two hundred and sixty-six of the 1096 non-backbone proteins were predicted to be metabolism-related by the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) database. This reflects the evolution of S. flexneri from a non-pathogenic E. coli ancestor to a facultative intracellular pathogen. Among the 393 Sf8401 specific proteins (compared with MG1655) only 28 are specific to all known Shigella genomes; most of them are bacteriophage-related proteins or hypothetical proteins (Additional file 3).
Table 1

General features of the Shigella genomes compared with the genome of E. coli K12 MG1655

Chromosome

MG1655*

Sd197†

Sf301†

Sf8401

Sb227†

Ss046†

Total length (bp)

4,639,675

4,369,232

4,607,203

4,574,284

4,519,823

4,825,265

No. of total ORFs

4,254

4,557

4,434

4,316

4,353

4,434

No. of pseudogenes

12

285

254

198

217

210

Percentage of CDS (%)

87.3

77.2

80.4

80.8

80.5

80.5

G+C content (%)

50.79

51.25

50.89

50.92

51.21

51.01

No. of 16S/23S/5S

7/7/8

7/7/8

7/7/8

7/7/8

7/7/8

7/7/8

No. transfer RNA

86

85

97

97

91

97

IS elements (percentage)

44 (1%)

623 (12%)

314 (7%)

278 (6.3%)

403 (9%)

394 (8%)

* Data are obtained from a recently updated version of U00096.

† Data are obtained from ref.[14].

Figure 1
Figure 1

Global comparison of Sf8401 chromosome with Sf301. Each marker length denotes 300 kb for chromosome comparisons. Color code denotes maximal length of the paired segments: red, >10 kb; blue, 5~10 kb; cyan, 1~5 kb. The inversion is abbreviated to IV.

IS elements are ubiquitous in bacterial genomes and important factors in evolution [17]. The IS insertion can cause gene inactivation, activate cryptic genes or alter the expression of adjacent genes [18]. The numbers and species of IS elements in the Sf8401 genome are similar to previously-determined Shigella genomes. In total, the IS elements encode 485 ORFs and make up 6.37% (291.3 kb) of the chromosome, and the predominant species is IS1. A distinct difference is that Sf301 has 13 copies of iso-IS10R, while Sf8401 and other sequenced Shigella chromosomes have not. This might be used as a marker for epidemiological studies. Furthermore, IS elements are capable of causing various genetic rearrangements such as deletions, inversions and translocations [19, 20]. Unlike the inversion reported in Yersinia pestis [21], S. enterica serovar Typhi [22] and E. coli K-12 strain W3110 [13, 23], which are associated with rRNA homologies, inversions in Sf8401 are probably mediated by IS elements. Inversions 1 and 5 (Fig. 1) occur around SHI-O and SHI-2, which are mediated by IS629 and IS1. Besides these major inversions, there are other four inverted regions, inversions 2, 3, 4 and 6 (Fig. 1), which are probably mediated by IS4, ISSfl2, IS600 and IS1 respectively.

Diversity of SHI-O

LPS is an important virulence factor in Shigella [24]. Since the immune response to Shigella spp. is O-antigen specific, an immune response to a specific O antigen does not protect against infection with other serotypes. Therefore, the capacity to alter serotypes may be advantageous for Shigella spp. in the infectious process [25]. In Sf8401, the serotype conversion region, i.e. SHI-O [26], is located around 300 kb (Fig. 1). In SHI-O the 3 genes termed gtrA, gtrB and gtrV (a serotype-specific glycosyltransferase) are putatively involved in glucosylation reactions [27]. The mean GC content of gtrA and gtrB is 42.71%, and the GC content of gtrV is 32.99%. All three are lower than the whole genome GC content (50.92%). Compared with Sf301, gtrA and gtrB are highly conserved and interchangeable among serotypes, whereas gtr (serotype) appears to be unique to each bacteriophage [28, 29], which indicates that these genes have been acquired from lysogeny caused by bacteriophages.

The SHI-O component differs between Sf301 and Sf8401 (Fig. 2a). Although type II antigen is encoded by an inducible bacteriophage, SfII [30], little genomic sequence of bacteriophage SfII remains in the SHI-O of 2457T and Sf301 except the key genes related to antigenic variation [13]. However, the Sf8401 SHI-O includes not only the type V antigen gene, which comes from bacteriophage SfV, but also another 15 kb segment of bacteriophage SfV [27, 31].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Localized comparison of (a) SHI-O, (b) SHI-1, (c) SHI-2. Arrows indicate predicted ORFs in both strands. The direction of each arrow predicts the direction of transcription. Color code denotes maximal length of the paired segments: red, >10 kb; blue, 5~10 kb cyan; 1~5 kb. (a) The dark green block refers to a large region of bacteriophage SfV in the Sf8401 genome. (b) The yellow block refers to the 22 bp partial repeat sequence of pheV. Black indicates the 12 kb sequence downstream of SHI-1 in Sf301, which does not exist in Sf8401. The asterisk denotes a pseudogene. (c) The replication origin, ori, is indicated by a vertical arrow in each genome. The green block refers to the region that is colinear with the Sf301 genome.

Temperate bacteriophages of S. flexneri play an important role in serotype conversion. Bacteriophages SfV and SfII encode the factors involved in glucosylation of the O-antigen, and lysogenization results in conversion of serotype Y strains to serotypes 5 and 2 [27, 30]. The defining point for evolution of S. flexneri 2 and 5 from the S. flexneri ancestor is probably the acquisition of the precursor of the current-day O-antigen modification genes. It can be supposed that the S. flexneri ancestor acquired diverse O-antigen modification genes along with related bacteriophage sequences when the bacteriophages were integrated into the bacterial genomes. The genome rearrangements caused by IS elements in far-flung evolutional processes have interrupted these bacteriophage sequences in many Shigella genomes. However, there are ~15 kb of bacteriophage SfV sequence remnants in Sf8401, though far less bacteriophage SfII sequence has remained in Sf301. This might be because the Sf8401 genome is less dynamic than that of Sf301, or alternatively, it may suggest that Sf8401 arose later than Sf301. This hypothesis requires further investigation.

Absence of SHI-1

Shigella pathogenicity island SHI-1 encodes three characterized proteins: SigA, Pic and the enterotoxin ShET1. Functional analysis shows that SigA is cytopathic for HEp-2 cells and at least partly responsible for the ability of S. flexneri to stimulate fluid accumulation in ligated rabbit ileal loops [6]. The Pic protein, a serine protease, is involved in mucinase activity, serum resistance and hemagglutination [9]. Furthermore, ShET1 encoded by set1A and set1B could increase fluid accumulation in the rabbit loop model.

SHI-1 is located directly downstream of the pheV tRNA gene and includes an imperfect repeat of the 3'-end 22 bp of the pheV gene at the right boundary in Sf301 (Fig. 2b). Studies of SHI-1 distribution (she PAI) show that intact SHI-1 is present in all tested serotype 2a strains of S. flexneri but absent from some S. flexneri serotype strains such as 1a, 1b, 3b, 4 and 5 [32]. It is therefore not surprising that SHI-1 is wholly absent from Sf8401. However, the homolog of SF3004, a hypothetical protein located downstream of SHI-1 in Sf301, is situated next to the pheV gene in Sf8401 (SFV3027). Further investigation shows that the homolog of SF3004 is only present adjacent to SHI-1 in the Sf301 and 2457T genomes and the S. flexneri 2a she pathogenicity island [6]. So the presence of SFV3027 suggests that Sf8401 might have contained SHI-1 during its evolutionary history but lost it for unknown reasons. Sakellaris et al. [33] demonstrated that the spontaneous and precise excision of SHI-1 can occur via recombination between a 22 bp sequence at the 3' terminus of pheV and an imperfect direct repeat at the pheV-distal boundary of the SHI-1. Thus, we have probably witnessed the case in Sf8401. Undoubtedly, the mechanism by which SHI-1 is stabilized in S. flexneri 2a strains will be an interesting focus for further studies.

Inversion of SHI-2

SHI-2 encodes the synthesis and transport of aerobactin, a hydroxamate siderophore associated with increased virulence in enteric bacteria [10, 34], and is located downstream of the selC tRNA gene in Sf8401. The conservation of the component, organization and integration site of SHI-2 in Sf301 and Sf8401 implies that it was acquired by the S. flexneri ancestor before the serotypes diverged. However, the iut/iuc operon is located on the leading strand and on the counter-clockwise site of the replication origin in Sf301, but on the lagging strand and on the clockwise site in Sf8401 (Fig. 2c). Our previous genome studies revealed that SHI-2 in S. sonnei Ss046 was unlinked with the selC gene by an inversion, and SHI-3 of S. boydii Sb227 that carries a similar iut/iuc operon is linked with the pheU tRNA locus [14]. So in view of this information, the observation that the iut/iuc operon can inserted into a variety of different loci suggests that it is highly mobile and may be acquired by additional human or animal pathogens [10].

In Sf8401, SHI-2 is involved in inversion 5 that spans oriC (Fig. 1). All sequenced Shigella chromosomes have inversions at oriC and terC, which is suggested to be a common evolutionary feature of bacterial genomes [35]. In contrast to Sf301, inversion 5 is found from 3597 to 4100 kb in Sf8401, which appears to be mediated by the boundary IS1 copies in Sf8401 (Fig. 2c). However, the ~22 kb center region of inversion 5 that covers oriC retains colinearity with that of Sf301 (Fig. 2c; the block colored green). Since this region is sandwiched between two copies of IS4, it implies that two or more inversions have occurred: an inversion was followed by a re-inversion to restore colinearity.

Inversions can produce an "X" shape, which changes the positions of these sequences from their natural locations [35], and the distance from the iut/iuc operon to oriC in Sf8401 is different from that in Sf301 due to inversion 5 and the internal re-inversion mentioned above. Owing to bidirectional replication, there are extra copies of genes close to oriC, resulting in increased gene expression [36], and since dosage differences may cause the strengths of promoters to be evolutionarily optimized for their specific positions, cells in which genes are a different distance from oriC are at a selective disadvantage [37]. Hence, whether the change in position of the iut/iuc operon in Sf8401 has any influence on expression needs to be determined.

Differences among genes correlated with metabolism

The E. coli bet gene cluster (betABIT) contributes to the pathway for glycine-betaine biosynthesis from choline [38] and is located close to SHI-O in Sf8401 but absent from Sf301 and 2457T. Among eubacteria-compatible solutes, the most widespread is glycine-betaine, and this is the only osmoprotectant synthesized by E. coli [39, 40]. The choline-glycine-betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance on E. coli [38]. Whether this system offers an advantage to S. flexneri 5b for environmental survival over S. flexneri 2a or plays a role during infection requires further investigation. However, the inversion around the SHI-O may contribute to the deletion of the bet operon from S. flexneri 2a (Fig. 2a).

There are some differences in metabolic and physiological pathways between Sf8401 and Sf301. In both strains, some key metabolic pathways were inactivated by the creation of independent pseudogenes. For instance, the loss of ability to utilize D-sorbitol is due to the inactive states of srlE and srlA in Sf8401 and Sf301, respectively. It seems that Shigella strains have a general tendency to lose some pathways and functions, and this tendency has given rise to convergent evolution [41]. The microorganisms need to adapt to new niches by adopting a strictly pathogenic life-style. There must be some genes that provide little overall selective benefit in a new situation. These genes will be eliminated through mutational bias favoring deletions for the lack of selective force to maintain them [42]. Such functions, no longer active in one serotype but expressed in another, may lead to a better understanding of the diversity of the two serotypes and the evolution of S. flexneri.

Conclusion

As more bacterial genomes have been sequenced during recent years, the study of comparative genomics has progressed rapidly. Although five Shigella genomes have been reported, this is the first time that intra-species diversity has been characterized by comparing the genomes of two different serotypes of the same Shigella species. The comparison between Sf8401 and Sf301 has provided abundant biological and medical information.

The overall genomic organization, gene order and predicted proteomes of the two genomes are very similar, which suggests a high level of structural and functional conservation between the serotypes. Nevertheless, the colinearity of genome structure between these two serotypes was disrupted by several inversions, and along with the differences found in the known PAIs, these may contribute to differences in epidemicity and virulence between S. flexneri 5b and S. flexneri 2a.

S. flexneri 5b and S. flexneri 2a have experienced different selection pressures and evolutionary processes. These events (such as inversion, translocation, deletion and acquisition) have led to the diversity of SHI-O, the absence of SHI-1, the shift of SHI-2, and other differences between these two genomes. They have extensively reshaped the genome, presumably virulence to be more fully expressed. It can be supposed that the S. flexneri ancestor had acquired SHI-1 and SHI-2 before divergence, and diverged into different serotypes after the different SHI-Os were integrated. Subsequently, S. flexneri 5b deleted SHI-1 via recombination and changed the structure of SHI-2 by inversions, but S. flexneri 2a stabilized SHI-1 in its genome. Mechanisms not yet identified have helped to shape the differences between serotypes and led to the derivation of different serotypes from the same parental S. flexneri form. Characterizing the divergence between serotypes at the genetic level helps us to understand the evolution of S. flexneri. The interplay between organizing features of the chromosome, such as the pathogenicity and the elements inducing sequence variation and chromosomal rearrangements, may provide an explanation of why different genomes show such different levels of organization and how this relates to their evolutionary history and ecology.

In conclusion, by comparing the genomes of Sf8401 and Sf301, a large amount of data has been obtained. It is important in biological and medical research to compare genomes causing similar types of diseases in the same subspecies but different serotypes. The identification of shared traits is important for pathogenicity and for the study of its conservation, transfer, epidemiology, virulence and evolution. Although it is not clear at present whether these similarities and differences are common among S. flexneri, there is a possibility that such events lead to differences in virulence and pathogenicity. Future studies should identify which of the differences in these genomes accounts for the phenotypic differences.

Methods

Shigella flexneri 5b strain

Shigella flexneri 5b, strain 8401, was isolated and sequenced from epidemic in China, kindly provided by the National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

Shotgun sequencing and analysis

The whole genome sequence shotgun libraries for Sf8401 were established as described previously [12, 14], and ABI3730 automated sequencers were used for sequence collection. 48,000 clones were sequenced from both ends, giving rise to 8 times coverage of the genome. Sequences were assembled initially using the phred/phrap program with the Q20 criteria [43] when the sequence coverage was ~4-fold over the estimated size of the genome. The Consed program was used for sequence finishing [43]. Gaps among contigs were closed either by primer walking on selected clones, which were identified by analysis on the forward and the reversed links between contigs using a perl/Tk script, or by sequencing the DNA amplicons generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Glimmer 2.0, a program that searches for protein coding regions, was used to identify those ORFs possessing more than 30 consecutive codons [44]. Overlapping and closely clustered ORFs were manually inspected. Predicted polypeptide sequences were used to search the non-redundant protein database with BLASTP, and the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs) database was used to identify families to which predicted proteins are related [45]. Those cases in which a stop condon or deletion has resulted in an encoded protein that is less than 80% of the length of its counterpart in K-12 genome and those cases in which a frameshift of insertion has altered more than 20% of the amino acid sequence were classed as pseudogenes. Mobile elements and repetitive sequences were identified using the IS FINDER database [46]. GenomeComp was used for genomic comparison with default parameters [47]. The comparison figures used in Figure 1 and 2 were exported from GenomeComp with a 1500 bp filter setting along with the scale setting of 2000 for chromosomes. The KEGG database was used for the metabolic pathways analysis [48].

Data accessibility

Complete genome sequence of Sf8401 has been deposited in the Genbank. The accession number for chromosome is: CP000266.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jianguo Xu (CCDC) for providing strains. The work is supported by the State Key Basic Research Program (Grant No. 2005CB522904) and High Technology Project (Grant No. 2004AA223090) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Biological Sciences China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100094, China
(2)
State Key Laboratory for Molecular Virology and Genetic Engineering, Beijing, 100052, China
(3)
National Center of Human Genome Research, Beijing, 100176, China
(4)
Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China

References

  1. Kotloff KL, Winickoff JP, Ivanoff B, Clemens JD, Swerdlow DL, Sansonetti PJ, Adak GK, Levine MM: Global burden of Shigella infections: implications for vaccine development and implementation of control strategies. Bull World Health Organ. 1999, 77: 651-666.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Sansonetti PJ: Slaying the Hydra all at once or head by head?. Nature Med. 1998, 4: 499-500. 10.1038/nm0598supp-499.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hale TL: Genetic basis of virulence in Shigella species. Microbiol Rev. 1991, 55: 206-224.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Mei Y, Liu H, Xu J: Cloning and application of genus specific DNA probes for Shigella. Chinese J Epidemiol. 1989, 10: 167-170.Google Scholar
  5. Sansonetti PJ, Kopecko DJ, Formal SB: Involvement of a plasmid in the invasive ability of Shigella flexneri. Infect Immun. 1982, 35: 852-860.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Hasani K, Henderson IR, Sakellaris H, Rajakumar K, Grant T, Nataro JP, Robins-Browne R, Adler B: The sigA gene which is borne on the she pathogenicity island of Shigella flexneri 2a encodes an exported cytopathic protease involved in intestinal fluid accumulation. Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (5): 2457-2463. 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2457-2463.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hong M, Gleason Y, Wyckoff EE, Payne SM: Identification of two Shigella flexneri chromosomal loci involved in intercellular spreading. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 4700-4710.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Mogull SA, Runyen-Janecky LJ, Hong M, Payne SM: dksA is required for intercellular spread of Shigella flexneri via an RpoS-independent mechanism. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 5742-5751. 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5742-5751.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson IR, Czeczulin J, Eslava C, Noriega F, Nataro JP: Characterization of Pic, a secreted protease of Shigella flexneri and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 5587-5596.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Vokes SA, Reeves SA, Torres AG, Payne SM: The aerobactin iron transport system genes in Shigella flexneri are present within a pathogenicity island. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 33: 63-73. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01448.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorma CJ, McKenna S, Beloin C: Regulation of virulence gene expression in Shigella flexneri, a facultative intracellular pathogen. Int J Med Microbio. 2001, 290: 89-96. 10.1078/1438-4221-00105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin Q, Yuan Z, Xu J, Wang Y, Shen Y, Lu W, Wang J, Liu H, Yang J, Yang F, Zhang X, Zhang J, Yang G, Wu H, Qu D, Dong J, Sun L, Xue Y, Zhao A, Gao Y, Zhu J, Kan B, Ding K, Chen S, Cheng H, Yao Z, He B, Chen R, Ma D, Qiang B, Wen Y, Hou Y, Yu J: Genome sequence of Shigella flexneri 2a: insights into pathogenicity through comparison with genomes of Escherichia coli K12 and O157. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 4432-4441. 10.1093/nar/gkf566.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Wei J, Goldberg MB, Burland V, Venkatesan MM, Deng W, Fournier G, Mayhew GF, Plunkett G, Rose DJ, Darling A, Mau B, Perna NT, Payne SM, Runyen-Janecky LJ, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Blattner FR: Complete Genome Sequence and Comparative Genomics of Shigella flexneri Serotype 2a Strain 2457T. InfectImmun. 2003, 71: 2775-2786.Google Scholar
  14. Yang F, Yang J, Zhang X, Chen L, Jiang Y, Yan Y, Tang X, Wang J, Xiong Z, Dong J, Xue Y, Zhu Y, Xu X, Sun L, Chen S, Nie H, Peng J, Xu J, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Wen Y, Yao Z, Shen Y, Qiang B, Hou Y, Yu J, Jin Q: Genome dynamics and diversity of Shigella species, the etiologic agents of bacillary dysentery. Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (19): 6445-6458. 10.1093/nar/gki954. 2005, Nov 7Google Scholar
  15. Buchrieser C, Glaser P, Rusniok C, Nedjari H, D'Hauteville H, Kunst F, Sansonetti P, Parsot C: The virulence plasmid pWR100 and the repertoire of proteins secreted by the type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol. 2000, 38: 760-771. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02179.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Venkatesan MM, Goldberg MB, Rose DJ, Grotbeck EJ, Burland V, Blattner FR: Complete DNA sequence and analysis of the large virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 3271-3285. 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3271-3285.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. BLOT M: Transposable elements and adaptation of host bacteria. Genetica. 1994, 93: 5-12. 10.1007/BF01435235.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Badia J, Ibanez E, Sabate M, Baldoma L, Aguilar J: A Rare 920-Kilobase Chromosomal Inversion Mediated by IS1 Transposition Causes Constitutive Expression of the yiaK-S Operon for Carbohydrate Utilization in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (14): 8376-8381. 10.1074/jbc.273.14.8376.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Schneider D, Duperchy E, Coursange E, Lenski RE, Blot M: Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. IX. Characterization of insertion sequence-mediated mutations and rearrangements. Genetics. 2000, 156: 477-488.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Turlan C, Chandler M: IS1-mediated intramolecular rearrangements: formation of excised transposon circles and replicative deletions. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 5410-5421.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Deng W, Burland V, Plunkett G, Boutin A, Mayhew GF, Liss P, Perna NT, Rose DJ, Mau B, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Fetherston JD, Lindler LE, Brubaker RR, Plano GV, Straley SC, McDonough KA, Nilles ML, Matson JS, Blattner FR, Perry RD: Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis KIM. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 4601-4611. 10.1128/JB.184.16.4601-4611.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Deng W, Liou SR, Plunkett G, Mayhew GF, Rose DJ, Burland V, Kodoyianni V, Schwartz DC, Blattner FR: Comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strains Ty2 and CT18. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 2330-2337. 10.1128/JB.185.7.2330-2337.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohara Y, Akiyama K, Isono K: The physical map of the whole E. coli chromosome: application of a new strategy for rapid analysis and sorting of a large genomic library. Cell. 1987, 50: 495-508. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90503-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhong QP: Pathogenic effects of Opolysaccharide from Shigella flexneri strain. World J Gastroenterol. 1999, 5 (3): 245-248.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Herbert Schmidt, Michael Hensel: Pathogenicity Islands in Bacterial Pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17 (11): 14-56.Google Scholar
  26. Ingersoll M, Groisman EA, Zychlinsky A: Pathogenicity islands of Shigella. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2002, 264: 49-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Huan PT, Bastin DA, Whittle BL, Lindberg AA, Verma NK: Molecular characterization of the genes involved in O-antigen modification, attachment, integration and excision in Shigella flexneri bacteriophage SfV. Gene. 1997, 195: 217-227. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00143-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Markine-Goriaynoff N, Gillet L, Van Etten JL, Korres H, Verma N, Vanderplasschen A: Glycosyltransferases encoded by viruses. J Gen Virol. 2004, 85: 2741-2754. 10.1099/vir.0.80320-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrovskaya VG, Licheva TA: A provisional chromosome map of Shigella and the regions related to pathogenicity. Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung. 1982, 29: 41-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mavris M, Manning PA, Morona R: Mechanism of bacteriophage SfII-mediated serotype conversion in Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 26: 939-950. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6301997.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Huan PT, Whittle BL, Bastin DA, Lindberg AA, Verma NK: Shigella flexneri type-specific antigen V: cloning, sequencing and characterization of the glucosyl transferase gene of temperate bacteriophage SfV. Gene. 1997, 195: 207-216. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00144-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Al-Hasani K, Adler B, Rajakumar K, Sakellaris H: Distribution and structural variation of the she pathogenicity island in enteric bacterial pathogens. J Med Microbiol. 2001, 50: 780-786.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sakellaris Harry , Luck , Shelley N, Al-Hasani , Keith , Rajakumar , Kumar , Turner , Sally A, Adler , Ben : Regulated site-specific recombination of the she pathogenicity island of Shigella flexneri. Molecular Microbiology. 2004, 52 (55): 1329-1336. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04048.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Moss JE, Cardozo TJ, Zychlinsky A, Groisman EA: The selC-associated SHI-2 pathogenicity island of Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 33: 74-83. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01449.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, White O, Salzberg SL: Evidence for symmetric chromosomal inversions around the replication origin in bacteria. Genome Biol. 2000, 1 (6): research0011.0011-0011.0019. 10.1186/gb-2000-1-6-research0011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmid MB, Roth JR: Gene location affects expression level in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 2872-2875.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Sushma Kothapalli , Satheesh Nair , Suneetha Alokam , Tikki Pang , Rasik Khakhria , David Woodward , Wendy Johnson , Stocker Bruce, Sanderson Kenneth, Shu-Lin Liu : Diversity of Genome Structure in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Populations. J Bacteriology. 2005, 187 (188): 2638-2650. 10.1128/JB.187.8.2638-2650.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Landfald B, Strom AR: Choline-glycine betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986, 165 (3): 849-855.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Farwick M, Siewe RM, Kramer R: Glycine Betaine Uptake after Hyperosmotic Shift in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177 (16): 4690-4695.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN: Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science. 1982, 217: 1214-1222.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Pupo GM, Lan R, Reeves PR: Multiple independent origins of Shigella clones of Escherichia coli and convergent evolution of many of their characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97: 10567-10572. 10.1073/pnas.180094797. 2000, Sep 12Google Scholar
  42. Andersson JO, Andersson SG: Genome degradation is an ongoing process in Rickettsia. Mol Biol Evol. 1999, 16 (9): 1178-1191.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 175-185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White : Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 544-548. 10.1093/nar/26.2.544.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 33-36. 10.1093/nar/28.1.33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. The IS FINDER Database. [http://www-is.biotoul.fr]
  47. Yang J, Wang J, Yao ZJ, Jin Q, Shen Y, Chen R: GenomeComp: a visualization tool for microbial genome comparison. J Microbiol Methods. 2003, 54: 423-426. 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00094-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M: The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D277-D280. 10.1093/nar/gkh063.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us