Skip to main content

An unexpectedly large and loosely packed mitochondrial genome in the charophycean green alga Chlorokybus atmophyticus



The Streptophyta comprises all land plants and six groups of charophycean green algae. The scaly biflagellate Mesostigma viride (Mesostigmatales) and the sarcinoid Chlorokybus atmophyticus (Chlorokybales) represent the earliest diverging lineages of this phylum. In trees based on chloroplast genome data, these two charophycean green algae are nested in the same clade. To validate this relationship and gain insight into the ancestral state of the mitochondrial genome in the Charophyceae, we sequenced the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of Chlorokybus and compared this genome sequence with those of three other charophycean green algae and the bryophytes Marchantia polymorpha and Physcomitrella patens.


The Chlorokybus genome differs radically from its 42,424-bp Mesostigma counterpart in size, gene order, intron content and density of repeated elements. At 201,763-bp, it is the largest mtDNA yet reported for a green alga. The 70 conserved genes represent 41.4% of the genome sequence and include nad10 and trnL(gag), two genes reported for the first time in a streptophyte mtDNA. At the gene order level, the Chlorokybus genome shares with its Chara, Chaetosphaeridium and bryophyte homologues eight to ten gene clusters including about 20 genes. Notably, some of these clusters exhibit gene linkages not previously found outside the Streptophyta, suggesting that they originated early during streptophyte evolution. In addition to six group I and 14 group II introns, short repeated sequences accounting for 7.5% of the genome were identified. Mitochondrial trees were unable to resolve the correct position of Mesostigma, due to analytical problems arising from accelerated sequence evolution in this lineage.


The Chlorokybus and Mesostigma mtDNAs exemplify the marked fluidity of the mitochondrial genome in charophycean green algae. The notion that the mitochondrial genome was constrained to remain compact during charophycean evolution is no longer tenable. Our data raise the possibility that the emergence of land plants was not associated with a substantial gain of intergenic sequences by the mitochondrial genome.


Green algae belonging to the class Charophyceae gave rise to all land plant species [1, 2]. In contrast to the large diversity of land plants, only a few thousand charophycean species are living today. Charophycean green algae and land plants form the lineage Streptophyta [3], whereas all of the other extant green algae belong to the sister lineage Chlorophyta [2]. Six monophyletic groups are currently recognized in the Charophyceae: the Mesostigmatales [4] represented by the scaly biflagellate Mesostigma viride that has long been regarded as a member of the Prasinophyceae (the earliest-diverging lineage of the Chlorophyta) [5], the Chlorokybales represented as well by a single species (Chlorokybus atmophyticus), the Klebsormidiales, the Zygnematales, the Coleochaetales and the Charales [6]. A phylogeny based on the nuclear 18S rRNA gene, the chloroplast atpB and rbcL and the mitochondrial nad5 from eight land plants, 26 charophycean taxa and five chlorophytes supports the notions that the Charales are sister to land plants and that charophycean green algae evolved progressively toward a more elaborated cellular complexity, occurring sequentially as biflagellated unicells, cubical packets of a few non-flagellated cells (sarcinoid morphology), unbranched/branched filaments and complex branched thalli with parenchymatous tissue [4, 7]. In this four-gene tree, the deepest branch is occupied by the Mesostigmatales, the Chlorokybales emerge just after the Mesostigmatales, the Zygnematales are resolved as the next divergence and finally, the Coleochaetales are sister to the clade uniting the Charales and land plants. This branching order of charophycean lineages, however, is not entirely congruent with phylogenetic studies based exclusively on concatenated organelle genes [812]; in particular, the position of the Mesostigmatales and the identity of the charophycean lineage(s) that is sister to land plants have raised controversies.

The debate about the position of the Mesostigmatales has now been resolved [13, 14]. The biflagellate Mesostigma represented the earliest divergence of the Streptophyta in the four-gene tree [4] and in single-gene trees based on 18S rDNA [15] and actin genes [16], whereas separate phylogenetic analyses of large data sets containing concatenated chloroplast genes/proteins [8, 9, 17, 18] or mitochondrial proteins [10] placed the Mesostigmatales before the split of the Streptophyta and Chlorophyta. Because the latter phylogenies included members of only a few green plant lineages, sparse taxon sampling was suspected to be a possible cause of the conflicting results. We recently generated and annotated the Chlorokybus chloroplast genome sequence and in the course of comparing this sequence with all previously sequenced chloroplast genomes, gathered compelling evidence for the affiliation of Mesostigma with the Streptophyta [13]. This charophycean chloroplast genome remarkably resembles its Mesostigma homologue at various levels (size, gene content, gene order and intron content) and interestingly, the Mesostigmatales and Chlorokybales form a robust clade representing the deepest branch of the Streptophyta in phylogenies based on concatenated gene sequences. Strong support for Mesostigma being nested within the Streptophyta also comes from phylogenetic analyses of 125 nuclear-encoded proteins [14]; however, in this investigation, the relationship of the Mesostigmatales with the other charophycean groups could not be addressed because the Closterium peracerosum-strigosum-littorale complex (Zygnematales) was the only additional streptophyte alga examined.

In the present study, we undertook the sequencing of Chlorokybus atmophyticus mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) with the goal of gaining better insight into the nature of the mitochondrial genome in the last common ancestor of all streptophytes. Given the abovementioned evidence for the close affiliation of Chlorokybus and Mesostigma in chloroplast phylogenomic trees, it was also of great interest to find out to what degree the Chlorokybus genome is similar to its Mesostigma counterpart and to mtDNAs of other charophycean green algae and land plants (in particular, bryophytes). Aside from Mesostigma [10], Chaetosphaeridium globosum (Coleochaetales) and Chara vulgaris (Charales) are the only charophyceans whose complete mtDNA sequences have been reported to date [19, 20] and compared with their homologues in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha [21] and the recently investigated moss Physcomitrella patens [22]. The three charophycean genomes are more densely packed with genes than their bryophyte homologues, although all five genomes have a similar coding potential. The higher degree of compaction observed for charophycean genomes largely explains their smaller sizes compared to land plant genomes. These observations are consistent with the notions that the last common ancestor of all streptophytes carried a relatively small and gene-rich mitochondrial genome and that substantial expansion of the intergenic spacers coincided with the emergence of land plants. Strikingly, at the gene organizational level, the Mesostigma genome has retained only traces of the numerous ancestral gene clusters preserved in other streptophyte mtDNAs. Gene order and intron content in the Chara genome most resemble those of land plant mtDNAs.

We report here that the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome differs dramatically from Mesostigma mtDNA at the levels of size, gene order and intron content. Although the Chlorokybus genome is substantially larger than any other green algal mtDNA characterized yet, its gene organization features a pronounced degree of ancestral features. Our findings provide new light into mitochondrial genome evolution in the Streptophyta.


General genomic features

The Chlorokybus mtDNA sequence maps as a circular molecule of 201,763 bp (Figure 1), with an overall A+T content of 60.2%. This sequence is 4.8-fold larger than its Mesostigma counterpart [10] and is the largest among all green algal mitochondrial genomes sequenced to date. While the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome is slightly smaller (20 kb) than the mtDNA of rapeseed [23] and is nearly two- to three-fold smaller than all six other angiosperm mtDNAs whose complete sequences have been reported thus far [2429], its size exceeds those observed for the mtDNAs of the liverwort Marchantia [21] and the moss Physcomitrella [22] (Table 1). Considering that this charophycean green algal genome encodes 70 conserved genes, its coding capacity closely matches those of its homologues in the charophyceans Chaetosphaeridium (Coleochaetales) [19] and Chara (Charales) [20], the bryophytes Marchantia and Physcomitrella [21, 22] (Table 1) and the chlorophyte Nephroselmis olivacea (Prasinophyceae) [30]. The gene repertoires of angiosperm mtDNAs (see Table 1 in [20]) and other completely sequenced green algal mtDNAs (see Table 1 in [31]) are more limited, featuring 12–61 conserved genes. The conserved genes in Chlorokybus mtDNA represent 41.4% of the total genome sequence, a coding density lower than those observed for Marchantia and Physcomitrella mtDNAs (Table 1). Ranging from 7 to 11,340 bp, the intergenic spacers in the Chlorokybus genome have an average size of about 1,690 bp. Repeated elements populate these regions, with the relative abundance of such elements in the genome (7.5%) being similar to that observed in Marchantia mtDNA (Table 1). With six group I introns and 14 group II introns, the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome is richer in introns than its Mesostigma and Chaetosphaeridium counterparts (Table 1). All group I introns, with a single exception, contain an open reading frame (ORF), whereas only two group II introns feature an ORF (Figure 1).

Table 1 General features of mtDNAs from Chlorokybus, other charophycean green algae and bryophytes
Figure 1

Gene map of Chlorokybus mtDNA. Genes (closed boxes) shown on the outside of the map are transcribed in a clockwise direction, whereas those on the inside of the map are transcribed counterclockwise. Introns are represented by open boxes and intron ORFs are denoted by narrow, hatched boxes. Blocks of gene sequences colinear with Physcomitrella mtDNA are shown as alternating series of green and red boxes. Genes absent from Physcomitrella mtDNA are represented in orange, whereas genes present in Physcomitrella mtDNA but located outside the conserved blocks are shown inblack. tRNA genes are indicated by the one-letter amino acid code (Me, elongator methionine; Mf, initiator methionine) followed by the anticodon in parentheses.

Gene content

The Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome encodes three rRNAs, 28 tRNAs, 17 ribosomal proteins, 21 ATP synthase and respiratory chain components and a protein involved in the Sec-independent translocation pathway (MttB). The 5S rRNA lacks the atypical insertion of 26–27 nucleotides observed in the variable loop B of its Mesostigma counterpart [10]. As reported for all streptophyte mtDNAs sequenced thus far, the set of encoded tRNA species is not sufficient to decode all of the 61 codons identified in the genome, owing to the absence of one or more species that can recognize the ACR codons specifying threonine.

The nad10 and trnL(gag) genes have not been previously identified in streptophyte mitochondria (Table 2); however, these genes have been reported in members of the Prasinophyceae, the earliest-diverging class of chlorophyte algae. Both genes are present in Ostreococcus tauri [32]; in addition, nad10 has been found in the prasinophyte Nephroselmis [30] and also in the cryptophyte alga Rhodomonas salina [33]. The gene repertoire of Chlorokybus is most similar to those of Mesostigma and Chaetosphaeridium (Table 2); in total, seven gene differences distinguish the latter two algae from Chlorokybus. The mitochondrial gene distribution among streptophytes highlights no specific alliance between Mesostigma and Chlorokybus, i.e. there are no genes that are uniquely missing or present in Chlorokybus and Mesostigma compared to their streptophyte counterparts (Table 2).

Table 2 Differences between the mitochondrial gene repertoires of Chlorokybus, other charophycean green algae and bryophytes

Potential functions could be assigned to the proteins specified by the seven intron ORFs in Chlorokybus mtDNA; however, BLASTP searches using as queries the proteins predicted from the ten free-standing ORFs larger than 100 codons [Genbank:EF463011] revealed no significant sequence similarity with any previously reported proteins. We found that the ORFs located within the atp9 and cox1 group II introns (orf845 and orf755, respectively) each encode a retron-type reverse transcriptase/type II intron maturase, whereas all five group I intron ORFs encode putative LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases. The protein specified by the rnl intron ORF (orf170) carries a single copy of the LAGLIDADG motif, whereas the products of the remaining group I intron ORFs (orf260, orf274, orf296 and orf301) feature two copies of this motif. Endonuclease activity specific for the cognate intron insertion site has been demonstrated for the homologues of three Chlorokybus intron ORFs located in positionally homologous introns in chlorophyte organelle genomes, i.e. for I-CsmI [34], I-CreI [35] and I-CpaII [36].

Genome organization

At the level of gene organization, the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome differs remarkably from its Mesostigma counterpart and unlike the latter displays significant similarity with Chaetosphaeridium and Chara mtDNAs as well as with the mitochondrial genomes of the bryophytes Marchantia and Physcomitrella (Table 3). Only four of the conserved genes in the Mesostigma genome are arranged in the same order in the Chlorokybus genome, forming two conserved gene clusters (rpl6-rps13 and rps12-rps7) that are vestiges of operons found in the bacterial ancestors of mitochondria. These two pairs of ribosomal protein genes also entirely account for the conservation of gene order observed between the Mesostigma genome and those of Chaetosphaeridium, Marchantia and Physcomitrella.

Table 3 Conservation of gene order in streptophyte mitochondrial genomes

In contrast, a total of 20 to 22 genes forming eight to ten conserved gene clusters account for the conservation of gene order observed between the Chlorokybus genome and its homologues in the Coleochaetales, Charales and bryophytes (Table 3). In Figure 1 are highlighted the eight clusters that the Chlorokybus genome shares with its homologue in the moss Physcomitrella. These conserved clusters, which encode about one third of the genes common to these genomes (20/61), comprise six gene pairs, one triplet and one quintuplet. All gene pairs, except rps2-trnF(gaa), have been identified in the mtDNAs of chlorophytes [30, 37] or other eukaryotes, including the mtDNA of the heterotrophic jakobid flagellate Reclinomonas americana [38]. The two other clusters have been detected only as fragments (sdh3-sdh4-nad4L, rps1-atp8 and atp8-atp4) in these genomes.

The Chara genome is the charophycean green algal mtDNA that most closely resembles its land plant counterparts, with more than 86% of the genes common to Chara and the two investigated bryophytes being part of conserved clusters. The smaller number of clusters identified in the Chara/Physcomitrella comparison (10 clusters) versus the Chara/Marchantia comparison (16 clusters) indicates that more rearrangements occurred in the lineage leading to the liverwort Marchantia than in that leading to Physcomitrella. Using GRIMM, we estimated that only 12 inversions would be required to interconvert the mitochondrial gene orders of Chara and Physcomitrella (Table 3).


The six group I introns in Chlorokybus mtDNA reside in cob, cox1 (sites 732, 879 and 1119), rns and rnl at the same gene locations as structurally similar mitochondrial introns previously reported in charophycean green algae and bryophytes (Figure 2). Most of these introns have also homologues in chlorophyte mtDNAs [30, 31, 37, 39, 40]. The Chlorokybus cox1 intron at site 732 has homologues not only in Chara, Marchantia, chlorophytes and land plants but also in fungi [20]. This is the insertion site of the mobile intron that angiosperms acquired on multiple occasions [41]. Like its land plant, fungal and chlorophyte counterparts, the site-732 Chlorokybus cox1 intron encodes a double LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease; however, it shares no specific relationship with fungal introns. The maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) trees inferred from the site-732 cox1 intron sequences of 15 green algal/land plant taxa and four fungi (169 sites corresponding to the intron core) were congruent in showing that the Chlorokybus intron affiliates with its Chara and Marchantia counterparts and that the resulting clade occupies a sister position relative to that containing the introns from the chlorophytes Prototheca wickerhamii and Chlorella vulgaris (data not shown).

Figure 2

Distribution of introns in Chlorokybus and other streptophyte mtDNAs. Circles denote the presence of group I introns and squares denote the presence of group II introns. Divided squares represent trans-spliced group II introns. Open symbols denote the absence of intron ORFs, whereas filled symbols denote their presence. Intron insertion sites in genes coding for tRNAs and proteins are given relative to the corresponding genes in Reclinomonas americana mtDNA; insertion sites in rns and rnl are given relative to Escherichia coli 16S and 23S rRNAs, respectively. For each insertion site, the position corresponding to the nucleotide immediately preceding the intron is reported.

Four of the group II introns in Chlorokybus mtDNA lie in protein-coding genes (atp9, cox1, cox2 and cox3), whereas the remaining ten introns reside in tRNA genes (Figure 2). Only two of these introns, those in trnG(ucc) and trnS(gcu), are known to have homologues at identical positions in the corresponding mitochondrial genes of other charophycean green algae and/or land plants (Figure 2). In the case of the ORF-containing cox1 intron at site 879, positional and structural homologues carrying a similar ORF have been identified exclusively outside the Streptophyta, i.e. in the chlorophyte Oltmannsiellopsis viridis [31], the brown alga Pylaiella littoralis [42] and the cryptophyte alga Rhodomonas salina [33]. Unlike the orf606 of its Oltmannsiellopis counterpart [31], the orf755 of the Chlorokybus cox1 intron can be aligned with the entire Rhodomonas cox1 intron ORF (orf762). The majority of introns in Chlorokybus tRNA genes are inserted two nucleotides upstream of the anticodon; only the trnS(gcu) and trnI(cau) introns represent notable exceptions. Instead of being located in the anticodon loop, the insertion site of the trnS(gcu) intron lies within the anticodon arm (six nucleotides upstream of the anticodon), whereas that of the trnI(cau) intron occurs in the TψC arm. In this context, it is interesting to mention that, in the chloroplast genomes of land plants and charophycean green algae belonging to the Charales, Coleochaetales and Zygnematales, a number of group II introns in tRNA genes are also inserted two nucleotides upstream of the anticodon [11]. Only the streptophyte chloroplast introns found in trnV(uac) occur at the same gene location as one of the Chlorokybus mitochondrial group II introns. Despite this positional homology, our sequence comparisons uncovered no specific relationship between the Chlorokybus mitochondrial trnV(uac) intron and its chloroplast counterparts.

Repeated elements

As estimated with RepeatMasker, repeats represent 7.5% of the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome sequence (Table 1). Although there is a similar proportion of repeats in Marchantia mtDNA, such sequences are less abundant in the mitochondria of the moss Physcomitrella and the three other charophycean green algal mitochondrial genomes investigated to date (Table 1). The Chlorokybus repeats are generally located in intergenic regions and comprise both tandem and dispersed sequence elements.

In the case of the tandem repeats, 11 different repeat units ranging from 4 to 28 bp in size and present in 2 to 39 copies per locus were identified (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1 for a list of the tandem repeat units and a description of their features). The tandem repeats made up of units smaller than 11 bp are dispersed in the Chlorokybus genome, occurring at up to 249 distinct loci. With regard to the dispersed repeats, 11 different units were identified (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 2 for the sequences of the dispersed repeat units), with at least two (AATGCA and GGGCTGC) being clearly related to some of the repeat units constituting the tandem repeats (ATGCA, TGCA, GGGCTGCACT and GGGCT). The sizes of the units featured by the dispersed repeats range from 6 to 8 bp and the numbers of perfectly identical copies vary from 29 to 520 (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 2 for the copy numbers of the dispersed repeat units). In addition to the latter copies of dispersed repeat units, we find a large number of copies carrying a single mismatch in their sequences. Similar or distinct repeat units often associate to form longer repeats, including stem-loop structures. None of the repeated units reported here were found to be identical to those present in the Chlorokybus chloroplast genome [13].

Phylogenetic analyses

To determine the phylogenetic position of Chlorokybus as inferred from mitochondrial genomic data, we analyzed an amino acid data set containing a total of 4,024 sites using the ML method (Figure 3). This data set was derived from 18 protein-coding genes common to the mtDNAs of 13 green algal/land plant taxa and three non-green algae. As expected, ML analysis strongly supported the placement of Chlorokybus within the Streptophyta; however, the precise relationship of this charophycean green alga with Mesostigma could not be determined with confidence. The best ML tree identified a weakly supported clade uniting Chlorokybus and Mesostigma at the base of the Streptophyta. In alternative tree topologies, Mesostigma was found either as sister to all streptophytes or before the divergence of the Streptophyta and Chlorophyta. The branch leading to Mesostigma is markedly longer than that leading to Chlorokybus, suggesting that long-branch attraction artefacts are responsible for the positioning of the former alga outside the Streptophyta. Consistent with this notion, MP analysis, which is known to be more sensitive to long-branch attraction [43], provided very strong support (93% bootstrap support) for Mesostigma representing the earliest-diverging lineage of the Viridiplantae (data not shown).

Figure 3

Phylogenetic position of Chlorokybus within the Viridiplantae. Best ML tree inferred from 18 mitochondrial-encoded proteins shared by 16 algal/plant taxa. The three non-green algae (bottom of the figure) were used as outgroup. Bootstrap values obtained in PHYML analyses are indicated on the corresponding nodes. The detailed names of taxa are reported in the Methods. The 18 genes analyzed are as follows: atp4,6,8,9, cob, cox1,2,3, mttB, nad1,2,3,4,4L,5,6, rps3,12.


Highly variable gene density in charophycean mitochondrial genomes

The large size and spacious intergenic spacers of the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome represent unusual traits. At 201,763 bp, this 70-gene encoding mtDNA is three- to five-fold larger than the three other previously characterized charophycean genomes, all of which have approximately the same number of conserved genes (Table 1). Moreover, it is about twice as large as its homologue carrying 57 conserved genes in the chlorophyte Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae), the largest green algal mitochondrial genome sequence reported so far [40]. With intergenic spacers accounting for 41% of its sequence, Chlorokybus mtDNA is now also recognized as the most loosely packed green algal mitochondrial genome (Table 1). Of particular interest is the close resemblance of this charophycean genome with the mtDNA of the bryophyte Marchantia with regards to size, gene content, gene density and abundance of repeats [21]. As is the case for bryophytes, the intergenic sequences in Chlorokybus mtDNA have no recognizable homology to any known sequences in public databases, suggesting that the increased size of these regions is largely accounted for by expansion of endogenous sequences. In angiosperms, a significant fraction of the mtDNA size (Arabidopsis, 1.1% [27]; sugar beet, 2.1% [24]; tobacco, 2.5% [26]; wheat, 3.0% [29]; rapeseed, 3.6% [23]; maize, 4.4% [28]; rice, 6.3% [25]) is accounted for by sequences derived from the chloroplast genome. The important variation in gene density reported here thus indicates that mitochondrial genome evolution in charophycean green algae is less uniform than previously thought. This unexpected finding challenges current concepts that the mitochondrial genome was constrained to remain compact during the evolution of charophycean green algae and that this evolutionary pressure became relaxed when land plants emerged [20]. Two waves of mitochondrial genome expansion have been documented during land plant evolution: one coinciding with the transition from charophycean green algae to land plants and the other with the emergence of angiosperms [20, 44].

The prominent size and low gene density of the Chlorokybus genome sequence are compatible with two evolutionary scenarios. First, as suggested earlier [20], it is possible that the mitochondrial genome of the last common ancestor of all streptophytes featured a very compact gene organization such as those observed in the Mesostigma and Chara genomes and that intergenic regions enlarged independently and convergently in the basal charophycean lineage leading to Chlorokybus and the late-diverging streptophyte lineage leading to bryophytes. Genome expansion in specific lineages has also been proposed to explain the atypical mtDNA size and relatively low gene density observed for the ulvophyte Pseudendoclonium [40]. In agreement with this notion, the more compact 56,761-bp mtDNA of Oltmannsiellopsis viridis [31], a representative of a separate early-diverging lineage of the Ulvophyceae, falls within the size range observed for members of the three other chlorophyte classes [30, 32, 37, 45]. Although the abovementioned scenario for streptophyte mtDNA evolution is supported by the finding of densely packed mtDNAs in most investigated chlorophytes (see Table 1 in reference [31]), other algae [33, 42, 4649] and unicellular eukaryotes from other lineages [50], the currently available distribution of gene density for charophycean mitochondrial genomes does not rule out the possibility that the ancestral streptophyte mitochondrial genome was less compact than previously assumed and that intergenic spacers contracted independently in the lineages leading to Mesostigma and Chara. If correct, this second evolutionary scenario predicts that the emergence of the earliest diverging land plants was not necessarily accompanied with a substantial gain of sequences. Mitochondrial genome sequences from more charophycean green algae, in particular from members of the Klebsormidiales, Zygnematales and additional lineages from the Coleochaetales will be required to fully understand the dynamics of mitochondrial genome evolution in this algal group.

Contrasting evolutionary trends of the mitochondrial genome in the Chlorokybus and Mesostigma lineages

Our recent analysis of three distinct sets of chloroplast genome data (gene order, gene content and sequences of concatenated genes) revealed that Chlorokybus is closely related to Mesostigma [13]. In light of this close relationship, our finding that the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome differs considerably from its Mesostigma counterpart not only in gene density but also in gene order came as a surprise. No specifically shared genomic features could be identified in these charophycean mitochondrial genomes. On the other hand, the substantial differences in intron content displayed by Chlorokybus and Mesostigma mtDNAs were anticipated considering that the variable intron distributions previously reported for charophycean algae and bryophytes are consistent with numerous gains of lineage-specific introns by each genome (see Figure 2 and [20, 22]). In this context, it should be mentioned that the mobile group I introns found at site 2593 within the Chlorokybus and Mesostigma rnl genes (Figure 2) cannot be necessarily regarded as a shared character, as an homologous intron is present at the same location in Nephroselmis mtDNA [30]. The presence of a large number of group II introns in tRNA genes is unique to the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome. Because eight of these ten tRNA introns lie at the same site within the anticodon loop, it is possible that they arose through proliferation of a founding intron in the Chlorokybus lineage (perhaps the trnG(ucc) intron that is also found in Chaetosphaeridium mtDNA) and that they diverged substantially in sequence following their insertion in different tRNA genes.

The Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome has retained numerous ancestral characters at the gene content and gene organizational levels. This genome is the most gene-rich among the green algal mtDNAs sequenced thus far and features two genes that have not been reported to be mtDNA-encoded in streptophytes prior to our study [nad10 and trnL(gag)], thus bringing to 75 the number of genes making up the gene repertoire of the common ancestor of all streptophytes (Table 2). Of these genes, seven (rpl2, rps1, sdh3, sdh4, yejR, yejU and yejV) are not found in the Chlorophyta. The mitochondrial genome sequences currently available for chlorophytes suggest that the gene repertoire of the common ancestor of these algae was more limited and included 70 genes, only two of which are not present in the Streptophyta [rnpB and trnT(ugu)].

Like its bryophyte counterparts, the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome has maintained several ancestral gene clusters even though short repeated sequences and spacious intergenic regions increase opportunities for gene rearrangements [44, 51]. On the other hand, clear evidence that rearrangements affected a few ancestral clusters comes from the observation that the Chlorokybus genome has not preserved the eubacteria-like arrangement of the ribosomal protein genes corresponding to the contiguous S10, spc and α operons of Escherichia coli (the cluster corresponding to the 11-gene segment delimited by rps10 and rps11 in Marchantia) as well as the nad5-nad4-nad2 cluster, both of which are found in the Chaetosphaeridium, Chara and the two bryophyte genomes. Interestingly, some of the eight to ten clusters shared by Chlorokybus and other streptophyte mtDNAs (Table 3) exhibit gene linkages [rps2-trnF(gga), trnP(ugg)-sdh3 and nd4L-trnY(gua)] that have not been documented outside the Streptophyta, suggesting that they arose very early during streptophyte evolution.

Evidently, the Chlorokybus and Mesostigma mitochondrial genomes were shaped by divergent forces acting at multiple levels. First, let us consider the gene content and more particularly, the genes lost specifically in each of these charophycean lineages. The Chlorokybus gene repertoire lacks only one of the 65 genes present in Mesostigma mitochondria [trnR(acg)] and according to the gene distribution currently available for charophycean green algae and bryophytes (Table 2), this gene was lost uniquely in the Chlorokybus lineage. Aside from nad10 and trnL(gag), all but one (rps8) of the four mitochondrial genes that are present in Chlorokybus but missing from Mesostigma represent gene losses unique to the Mesostigma lineage (Table 2). With respect to gene organization, the Mesostigma mitochondrial genome shows even more differences with its Chlorokybus homologue. In sharp contrast to all other completely sequenced streptophyte mtDNAs, ancestral gene clusters are virtually absent from Mesostigma mtDNA (Table 3), implying that extensive gene rearrangements took place in this charophycean lineage. In fact, gene shuffling events were so extensive that they disrupted the continuity of the nad3 gene within the two group II introns, giving rise ultimately to the scattering of the three exons and trans splicing of the introns at the RNA level [10]. Considering that gene rearrangements in organelle genomes are often associated with repeated sequences [44, 51], the absence of such elements from Mesostigma mtDNA might suggest that short repeats once existed as integral components of the mitochondrial genome but disappeared almost completely during streamlining of the intergenic regions. Gene rearrangements are not the only major, lineage-specific evolutionary events that marked the Mesostigma genome. In parallel, the rate of mtDNA sequence evolution accelerated in the Mesostigma lineage, leading to difficulties in correctly positioning this alga in mitochondrial phylogenomic trees (Figure 3).

The evolutionary pattern displayed by the Mesostigma mitochondrial genome is in some ways reminiscent of the 'reduced derived' pattern described for the mtDNAs of the chlorophyte green algae belonging to the Chlamydomonadales (Chlorophyceae) [39, 5254] as well as for the mtDNA of the enigmatic chlorophyte Pedinomonas minor [30]. The latter pattern is characterized by reduction of both genome size and gene content and by acceleration of primary sequence evolution [30, 50]. The reduced derived mtDNAs completely sequenced thus far vary from 15 to 25 kb in size (see Table 1 in reference [31]), encode 12 to 22 genes and display a number of derived characters at the levels of their gene organization and structure. Clearly, the sequence acceleration reported here for the tightly packed Mesostigma mitochondrial genome is a genomic trait shared by all reduced derived mtDNAs. But whether the evolution of this trait was connected with events of genome reduction and limited gene losses in the Mesostigma lineage remains unknown.


In uncovering remarkable differences in size and gene organization between the 201,763-bp Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome and its 42,424-bp Mesostigma counterpart, the study reported here provides new insights into mitochondrial genome evolution in the Streptophyta. Before this study, the prevailing view was that the ancestral streptophyte mitochondrial genome resembled the Mesostigma genome in being tightly packed with genes and that this trait was shared with other charophycean green algae. Our findings raise the possibility that the mitochondrial genome of the last common ancestor of all streptophytes bore resemblance to Chlorokybus and bryophyte mtDNAs with regard to size and gene density, implying that the emergence of land plants was not necessarily associated with a substantial gain of intergenic sequences. Mitochondrial genome sequences from a broader range of charophycean green algae will be required to determine whether the unusually large size of the Chlorokybus genome reflects an ancestral or a derived trait.


DNA cloning, sequencing and sequence analysis

Chlorokybus atmophyticus was obtained from the Sammlung von Algenkulturen Göttingen (SAG 48.80) and grown in medium C [55] under 12 h light/dark cycles. A random clone library was prepared from 1500- to 2000-bp fragments derived from a fraction containing both chloroplast DNA and mtDNA using the pSMART-HCKan (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI) plasmid [20]. DNA templates were generated with the QIAprep 96 Miniprep kit (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, Canada) and sequenced as described previously [56]. Sequences were edited and assembled using SEQUENCHER 4.2 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI). Genomic regions not represented in the clones analyzed were sequenced from PCR-amplified fragments. The fully annotated mitochondrial genome sequence has been deposited in [Genbank:EF463011].

Genes and ORFs were identified as described previously [57]. Introns were modelled according to the nomenclatures proposed for group I [58] and group II [59] introns. Homologous introns were identified by BLASTN searches [60] against the non-redundant database of National Center for Biotechnology Information. Repeated sequences were identified with REPuter 2.74 [61] using the -f (forward) and -p (palindromic) options at minimum lengths of 30 bp and were classified with the Comparative Repeat Analysis program [62]. Number of copies of each repeat unit was determined with FINDPATTERNS of the Wisconsin package version 10.3 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA) or FUZZNUC in EMBOSS 2.9.0 [63]. Stem-loop structures and tandem repeats were identified using PALINDROME and ETANDEM in EMBOSS 2.9.0, respectively. Genomic regions containing non-overlapping repeated elements were identified with RepeatMasker [64] running under the WU-BLAST 2.0 [65] search engine.

Analysis of genome rearrangements

A custom-built program (Patrick Charlebois, Claude Lemieux and Monique Turmel, unpublished data) was used to identify the gene clusters that are conserved in selected pairs of streptophyte mtDNAs. The numbers of gene permutations by inversions in pairwise mtDNA comparisons were inferred using the GRIMM web server [66]. In these analyses, the order of all genes/pseudogenes shared by each mtDNA pair was investigated. In the pairwise comparisons involving Marchantia mtDNA, one copy of the duplicated trnMf(cau) gene (the copy between atp4 and rnl) as well as one copy of the duplicated trnY(gua) [the copy between trnR(ucu) and trnR(acg)] were excluded from the data set.

Phylogenetic analyses

GenBank files for the following mitochondrial genomes were retrieved: Arabidopsis thaliana [Genbank:NC_001284], Beta vulgaris [Genbank:NC_002511], Chaetosphaeridium globosum [Genbank:NC_004118], Chara vulgaris [Genbank:NC_005255], Chondrus crispus [Genbank:NC_001677], Chlorokybus atmophyticus [Genbank:EF463011], Cyanidioschyzon merolae [Genbank:NC_000887], Marchantia polymorpha [Genbank:NC_001660], Mesostigma viride [Genbank:NC_008240], Nephroselmis olivacea [Genbank:NC_008239], Nicotiana tabacum [Genbank:NC_006581], Oltmannsiellopsis viridis [Genbank:NC_008256], Oryza sativa [Genbank:NC_007886], Physcomitrella patens [Genbank:NC_007945], Prototheca wickerhamii [Genbank:NC_001613] and Porphyra purpurea [Genbank:NC_002007]. A data set of 18 concatenated protein sequences was derived as described previously [20] from all protein-coding genes shared by these genomes. Phylogenetic analyses of the data set were carried out using ML and MP methods. ML trees were computed with PHYML 2.4.5 [67] under the WAG+Γ+I model of amino acid substitutions and bootstrap support for each node was calculated using 100 replicates. MP trees were inferred using PROTPARS in PHYLIP 3.65 [68] and confidence of branch points was assessed by bootstrap percentages after 100 replications.

A data set of intron sequences inserted at site 732 within the cox1 gene (169 sites corresponding to unambiguously aligned regions of the intron core) was analyzed using ML and MP methods. These analyses were performed with PAUP*4.0b10 [69] using a uniform rate of substitutions across sites. ML trees were inferred under the HKY model. Bootstrap support was assessed after 100 replications.


  1. 1.

    Graham LE, Cook ME, Busse JS: The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 4535-4540. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4535.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lewis LA, McCourt RM: Green algae and the origin of land plants. Am J Bot. 2004, 91 (10): 1535-1556.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bremer K, Humphries CJ, Mishler BD, Churchill SP: On cladistic relationships in green plants. Taxon. 1987, 36: 339-349. 10.2307/1221429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Karol KG, McCourt RM, Cimino MT, Delwiche CF: The closest living relatives of land plants. Science. 2001, 294 (5550): 2351-2353. 10.1126/science.1065156.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Melkonian M: Phylum Chlorophyta. Class Prasinophyceae. Handbook of Protoctista The Structure, Cultivation, Habitats and Life Histories of the Eukaryotic Microorganisms and their Descendants Exclusive of Animals, Plants and Fungi. Edited by: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M, Chapman DJ. 1990, Boston , Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 600-607.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mattox KR, Stewart KD: Classification of the green algae: a concept based on comparative cytology. The Systematics of the Green Algae. Edited by: Irvine DEG, John DM. 1984, London , Academic Press, 29-72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McCourt RM, Delwiche CF, Karol KG: Charophyte algae and land plant origins. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004, 19: 661-666. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.013.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lemieux C, Otis C, Turmel M: Ancestral chloroplast genome in Mesostigma viride reveals an early branch of green plant evolution. Nature. 2000, 403 (6770): 649-652. 10.1038/35001059.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Turmel M, Ehara M, Otis C, Lemieux C: Phylogenetic relationships among streptophytes as inferred from chloroplast small and large subunit rRNA gene sequences. J Phycol. 2002, 38: 364-375. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.01163.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of Mesostigma viride identifies this green alga as the earliest green plant divergence and predicts a highly compact mitochondrial genome in the ancestor of all green plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19 (1): 24-38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: The chloroplast genome sequence of Chara vulgaris sheds new light into the closest green algal relatives of land plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2006, 23 (6): 1324-1338. 10.1093/molbev/msk018.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Turmel M, Pombert JF, Charlebois P, Otis C, Lemieux C: The green algal ancestry of land plants as revealed by the chloroplast genome. Int J Plant Sci. 2007, 168 (5): 679–689-10.1086/513470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lemieux C, Otis C, Turmel M: A clade uniting the green algae Mesostigma viride and Chlorokybus atmophyticus represents the deepest branch of the Streptophyta in chloroplast genome-based phylogenies. BMC Biol. 2007, 5: 2-10.1186/1741-7007-5-2.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Becker B, Melkonian M: Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear, mitochondrial and plastid multi-gene datasets support the placement of Mesostigma in the Streptophyta. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (3): 723-731. 10.1093/molbev/msl200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Marin B, Melkonian M: Mesostigmatophyceae, a new class of streptophyte green algae revealed by SSU rRNA sequence comparisons. Protist. 1999, 150 (4): 399-417.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bhattacharya D, Weber K, An SS, Berning-Koch W: Actin phylogeny identifies Mesostigma viride as a flagellate ancestor of the land plants. J Mol Evol. 1998, 47: 544-550. 10.1007/PL00006410.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Martin W, Deusch O, Stawski N, Grunheit N, Goremykin V: Chloroplast genome phylogenetics: why we need independent approaches to plant molecular evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10: 203-209. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.007.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rogers MB, Gilson PR, Su V, McFadden GI, Keeling PJ: The complete chloroplast genome of the chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans: evidence for independent origins of chlorarachniophyte and euglenid secondary endosymbionts. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (1): 54-62. 10.1093/molbev/msl129.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: The chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences of the charophyte Chaetosphaeridium globosum: insights into the timing of the events that restructured organelle DNAs within the green algal lineage that led to land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (17): 11275-11280. 10.1073/pnas.162203299.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: The mitochondrial genome of Chara vulgaris: insights into the mitochondrial DNA architecture of the last common ancestor of green algae and land plants. Plant Cell. 2003, 15: 1888-1903. 10.1105/tpc.013169.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Oda K, Yamato K, Ohta E, Nakamura Y, Takemura M, Nozato N, Akashi K, Kanegae T, Ogura Y, Kohchi T, Ohyama K: Gene organization deduced from the complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Biol. 1992, 223: 1-7. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90708-R.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Terasawa K, Odahara M, Kabeya Y, Kikugawa T, Sekine Y, Fujiwara M, Sato N: The mitochondrial genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens sheds new light on mitochondrial evolution in land plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (3): 699-709. 10.1093/molbev/msl198.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Handa H: The complete nucleotide sequence and RNA editing content of the mitochondrial genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of rapeseed and Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (20): 5907-5916. 10.1093/nar/gkg795.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kubo T, Nishizawa S, Sugawara A, Itchoda N, Estiati A, Mikami T: The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial genome of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) reveals a novel gene for tRNA(Cys)(GCA). Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (13): 2571-2576. 10.1093/nar/28.13.2571.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Notsu Y, Masood S, Nishikawa T, Kubo N, Akiduki G, Nakazono M, Hirai A, Kadowaki K: The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002, 268: 434-445. 10.1007/s00438-002-0767-1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sugiyama Y, Watase Y, Nagase M, Makita N, Yagura S, Hirai A, Sugiura M: The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005, 272 (6): 603-615. 10.1007/s00438-004-1075-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Unseld M, Marienfeld JR, Brandt P, Brennicke A: The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nat Genet. 1997, 15: 57-61. 10.1038/ng0197-57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Clifton SW, Minx P, Fauron CM, Gibson M, Allen JO, Sun H, Thompson M, Barbazuk WB, Kanuganti S, Tayloe C, Meyer L, Wilson RK, Newton KJ: Sequence and comparative analysis of the maize NB mitochondrial genome. Plant physiology. 2004, 136 (3): 3486-3503. 10.1104/pp.104.044602.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ogihara Y, Yamazaki Y, Murai K, Kanno A, Terachi T, Shiina T, Miyashita N, Nasuda S, Nakamura C, Mori N, Takumi S, Murata M, Futo S, Tsunewaki K: Structural dynamics of cereal mitochondrial genomes as revealed by complete nucleotide sequencing of the wheat mitochondrial genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (19): 6235-6250. 10.1093/nar/gki925.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Turmel M, Lemieux C, Burger G, Lang BF, Otis C, Plante I, Gray MW: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of Nephroselmis olivacea and Pedinomonas minor: two radically different evolutionary patterns within green algae. Plant Cell. 1999, 11 (9): 1717-1729. 10.1105/tpc.11.9.1717.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pombert JF, Beauchamp P, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the green alga Oltmannsiellopsis viridis: evolutionary trends of the mitochondrial genome in the Ulvophyceae. Curr Genet. 2006, 50 (2): 137-147. 10.1007/s00294-006-0076-z.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Robbens S, Derelle E, Ferraz C, Wuyts J, Moreau H, Van de Peer Y: The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA sequences of Ostreococcus tauri: organelle genomes of the smallest eukaryote are examples of compaction. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (4): 956-968. 10.1093/molbev/msm012.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hauth AM, Maier UG, Lang BF, Burger G: The Rhodomonas salina mitochondrial genome: bacteria-like operons, compact gene arrangement and complex repeat region. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (14): 4433-4442. 10.1093/nar/gki757.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ma DP, King YT, Kim Y, Luckett WS: The group I intron of apocytochrome b gene from Chlamydomonas smithii encodes a site-specific endonuclease. Plant Mol Biol. 1992, 18 (5): 1001-1004. 10.1007/BF00019218.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Thompson AJ, Yuan X, Kudlicki W, Herrin DL: Cleavage and recognition pattern of a double-strand-specific endonuclease (I-CreI) encoded by the chloroplast 23S rRNA intron of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Gene. 1992, 119 (2): 247-251. 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90278-W.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Turmel M, Mercier JP, Côté V, Otis C, Lemieux C: The site-specific DNA endonuclease encoded by a group I intron in the Chlamydomonas pallidostigmatica chloroplast small subunit rRNA gene introduces a single-strand break at low concentrations of Mg2+. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 2519-2525. 10.1093/nar/23.13.2519.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wolff G, Plante I, Lang BF, Kück U, Burger G: Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the chlorophyte alga Prototheca wickerhamii. J Mol Biol. 1994, 237: 75-86. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1210.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lang BF, Burger G, O'Kelly CJ, Cedergren R, Golding GB, Lemieux C, Sankoff D, Turmel M, Gray MW: An ancestral mitochondrial DNA resembling a eubacterial genome in miniature. Nature. 1997, 387 (6632): 493-497. 10.1038/387493a0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Denovan-Wright EM, Nedelcu AM, Lee RW: Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of Chlamydomonas eugametos. Plant Mol Biol. 1998, 36 (2): 285-295. 10.1023/A:1005995718091.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pombert JF, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the green alga Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae) highlights distinctive evolutionary trends in the Chlorophyta and suggests a sister-group relationship between the Ulvophyceae and Chlorophyceae. Mol Biol Evol. 2004, 21 (5): 922-935. 10.1093/molbev/msh099.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cho Y, Qiu YL, Kuhlman P, Palmer JD: Explosive invasion of plant mitochondria by a group I intron. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95 (24): 14244-14249. 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14244.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fontaine JM, Goux D, Kloareg B, Loiseaux-de Goër S: The reverse-transcriptase-like proteins encoded by group II introns in the mitochondrial genome of the brown alga Pylaiella littoralis belong to two different lineages which apparently coevolved with the group II ribozyme lineages. J Mol Evol. 1997, 44: 33-42. 10.1007/PL00006119.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Felsenstein J: Inferring phylogenies. 2004, Sunderland (MA) , Sinauer Associates Inc, 266: 418-427.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Knoop V: The mitochondrial DNA of land plants: peculiarities in phylogenetic perspective. Curr Genet. 2004, 46 (3): 123-139. 10.1007/s00294-004-0522-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nedelcu AM, Lee RW, Lemieux C, Gray MW, Burger G: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of Scenedesmus obliquus reflects an intermediate stage in the evolution of the green algal mitochondrial genome. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 819-831. 10.1101/gr.10.6.819.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Burger G, Saint-Louis D, Gray MW, Lang BF: Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the red alga Porphyra purpurea: cyanobacterial introns and shared ancestry of red and green algae. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 1675-1694. 10.1105/tpc.11.9.1675.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Leblanc C, Boyen C, Richard O, Bonnard G, Grienenberger JM, Kloareg B: Complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of the rhodophyte Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales): Gene content and genome organization. J Mol Biol. 1995, 250: 484-495. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0392.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ohta N, Sato N, Kuroiwa T: Structure and organization of the mitochondrial genome of the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae deduced from the complete nucleotide sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26: 5190-5198. 10.1093/nar/26.22.5190.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Oudot-Le Secq MP, Kloareg B, Loiseaux-De GO, Euml, R S: The mitochondrial genome of the brown alga Laminaria digitata: a comparative analysis. Eur J Phycol. 2002, 37 (02): 163-172. 10.1017/S0967026202003542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gray MW, Lang BF, Burger G: Mitochondria of protists. Annu Rev Genet. 2004, 38: 477-524. 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142526.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Palmer JD: Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution. The Molecular Biology of Plastids. Edited by: Bogorad L, Vasil K. 1991, San Diego , Academic Press, 5-53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Boer PH, Gray MW: Short dispersed repeats localized in spacer regions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondrial DNA. Curr Genet. 1991, 19: 309-312. 10.1007/BF00355060.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kroymann J, Zetsche K: The mitochondrial genome of Chlorogonium elongatum inferred from the complete sequence. J Mol Evol. 1998, 47: 431-440. 10.1007/PL00006400.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Vahrenholz C, Rieman G, Pratje E, Dujon B, Michaelis G: Mitochondrial DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: the structure of the ends of the linear 15.8-kb genome suggests mechanisms for DNA replication. Curr Genet. 1993, 24: 241-247. 10.1007/BF00351798.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Andersen RA, Berges JA, Harrison PJ, Watanabe MM: Appendix A—Recipes for freshwater and seawater media. Algal Culturing Techniques. Edited by: Andersen RA. 2005, Burlington , Elsevier Academic Press, 429-538.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: The complete chloroplast DNA sequences of the charophycean green algae Staurastrum and Zygnema reveal that the chloroplast genome underwent extensive changes during the evolution of the Zygnematales. BMC Biology. 2005, 3: 22-10.1186/1741-7007-3-22.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Pombert JF, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M: The chloroplast genome sequence of the green alga Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae) reveals unusual structural features and new insights into the branching order of chlorophyte lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22 (9): 1903-1918. 10.1093/molbev/msi182.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Michel F, Westhof E: Modelling of the three-dimensional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. J Mol Biol. 1990, 216 (3): 585-610. 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90386-Z.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Michel F, Umesono K, Ozeki H: Comparative and functional anatomy of group II catalytic introns – a review. Gene. 1989, 82 (1): 5-30. 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90026-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R: REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (22): 4633-4642. 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Comparative Repeat Analysis. []

  63. 63.

    Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A: EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16 (6): 276-277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    RepeatMasker. []

  65. 65.

    WU-BLAST. []

  66. 66.

    Tesler G: GRIMM: genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: 492-493. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.492.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52 (5): 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Felsenstein J: PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package). Version 3.5. 1995, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle , Distributed by the author

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Swofford DL: PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. 2003, Sunderland, Massachusetts , Sinauer Associates

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Mélanie Bourassa for her help in sequencing the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to CL and MT).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monique Turmel.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

CL and MT conceived and designed the study, and wrote the manuscript. CL performed most of the sequence analyses and generated the figures. MT also contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. CO carried out the sequencing of the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome, identified the repeated sequence elements and analyzed the introns in this genome. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary tables

Additional file 1: . Supplementary tables S1 and S2 report the features of the tandem and dispersed repeats in the Chlorokybus mitochondrial genome. (PDF 64 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turmel, M., Otis, C. & Lemieux, C. An unexpectedly large and loosely packed mitochondrial genome in the charophycean green alga Chlorokybus atmophyticus. BMC Genomics 8, 137 (2007).

Download citation


  • Mitochondrial Genome
  • Land Plant
  • Chloroplast Genome
  • Mitochondrial Genome Sequence
  • Short Repeated Sequence