Skip to main content

Whole genome expression profiling reveals a significant role for immune function in human abdominal aortic aneurysms



Abdominal aortic aneurysms are a common disorder with an incompletely understood etiology. We used Illumina and Affymetrix microarray platforms to generate global gene expression profiles for both aneurysmal (AAA) and non-aneurysmal abdominal aorta, and identified genes that were significantly differentially expressed between cases and controls.


Affymetrix and Illumina arrays included 18,057 genes in common; 11,542 (64%) of these genes were considered to be expressed in either aneurysmal or normal abdominal aorta. There were 3,274 differentially expressed genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05. Many of these genes were not previously known to be involved in AAA, including SOST and RUNX3, which were confirmed using Q-RT-PCR (Pearson correlation coefficient for microarray and Q-RT-PCR data = 0.89; p-values for differences in expression between AAA and controls for SOST: 4.87 × 10-4 and for RUNX3: 4.33 × 10-5). Analysis of biological pathways, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), indicated extreme overrepresentation of immune related categories. The enriched categories included the GO category Immune Response (GO:0006955; FDR = 2.1 × 10-14), and the KEGG pathways natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity (hsa04650; FDR = 5.9 × 10-6) and leukocyte transendothelial migration (hsa04670; FDR = 1.1 × 10-5).


Previous studies have provided evidence for the involvement of the immune system in AAA. The current expression analysis extends these findings by demonstrating broad coordinate gene expression in immunological pathways. A large number of genes involved in immune function were differentially expressed in AAA, and the pathway analysis gave these results a biological context. The data provide valuable insight for future studies to dissect the pathogenesis of human AAA. These pathways might also be used as targets for the development of therapeutic agents for AAA.


Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common, late age-at-onset disorder affecting approximately 1–6 % of the population of industrialized countries, and approximately 9.5% of those 65 years and older [1, 2]. Rupture of AAA has high mortality, and is the 13th leading cause of death in the United States [1].

The etiology of AAA is complex, with many environmental and genetic factors contributing to the risk [1, 3, 4]. AAAs are characterized by signs of local chronic inflammation of the aortic wall, decreased numbers of smooth muscle cells in the aortic media layer and fragmentation of the extracellular matrix at the site of the aneurysm [4]. Risk factors have been identified, but the molecular events responsible for the initiation and progression of AAAs remain unknown. Many studies have focused on limited sets of plausible candidate genes, such as those encoding matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors, but recently microarrays have been used to elucidate a more global gene expression profile for AAA [48].

Previous studies have provided evidence for the involvement of the immune system in AAA formation and progression [see [912]]. Animal models of AAA have been used to test the contributions of components of the immune system [13, 14]. Cellular involvement of neutrophils, T cells, and macrophages has been found to be important in the formation of AAA in animal models [1517]. In addition, various immune-related molecules have been examined using the AAA models, and molecules such as NFκB, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, P47phox, IFNγ, and IL4, among others, have also been shown to be involved in the formation of an experimental aneurysm [1821]. In humans, the cellular immune infiltrates in the AAA tissue have been characterized by several groups. The findings indicate that many types of immune cells are found in AAAs, such as macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, T cells, and B cells [2225]. Changes in the circulating immune components of AAA patients included an increase in NK cells and CD4+CD28- T cells, as well as a decrease in the number of CD4+CD31+ T cells [2628]. These findings implicate the immune system in pathogenesis of AAA, and it has even been asserted that AAA is autoimmune [2931]. The precise role of the immune system in AAA pathophysiology has yet to be elucidated.

The present study utilized two microarray platforms to generate global mRNA expression profiles for both aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal abdominal aorta. These results provide valuable information to identify functional pathways involved in the pathogenesis of AAA without biasing the data by an a priori selection of genes. The global approach allows identification of the most relevant pathways, and the cross-platform validation protects against platform-specific artifacts. The current study does indeed validate some genes that were previously studied; however, it also extends the findings from the previous studies, suggests involvement of genes not previously studied, and in its global aggregate suggests which components within the pathways are the active components.


Aortic wall tissue samples were collected from patients who underwent repair operations for AAA, and from age, sex, and ethnicity-matched controls at autopsies (Table 1). RNA isolated from the tissue samples was used in global gene expression studies with two different platforms (Affymetrix and Illumina).

Table 1 Sample demographics

The Affymetrix whole-genome expression chip was run with 4 RNA pools, while the Illumina platform was run on 13 individual RNA samples and 2 pooled RNA samples (Table 1). The two independent platforms are comparable, with a total of 18,057 distinct genes (referred to as RefList) represented on both platforms (Affymetrix: 19,835; Illumina: 20,054). This subset of genes common to the two platforms was used as the basis for the analyses so that concordance between the two platforms could be determined. The genes that were excluded from the RefList were sparsely annotated (36% GO annotation; 3% KEGG annotation), consequently the loss of information due to excluding these genes was negligible.

A total of 11,542 distinct genes (64% of the RefList) passed the expression criteria of a Detection Score ≥ 0.99 in either AAA or control groups based on Illumina arrays (AAA: 11,077; control: 10,478; both: 10,285). The Affymetrix data indicated that 11,901 (66% of the RefList) of the genes were expressed, with 9,955 genes considered expressed by both platforms (55% of the RefList). Consistent with previous findings, increasing detection stringency increased the proportion of genes in common between the platforms [32]. To be conservative in avoiding false negatives (i.e., to avoid eliminating genes unnecessarily) we used a Detection Score ≥ 0.99 from the Illumina data as our criteria for a gene to be considered expressed.

Comparison of the profiles between AAA and control revealed 4,627 genes on the Illumina platform with a Detection Score ≥ 0.99 and a |DiffScore| ≥ 13 (which equates to a nominal p-value of ≤ 0.05). Correction for multiple testing yielded 3,274 distinct differentially expressed genes (DiffList) with an FDR ≤ 0.05 [see additional file 1:Table I] [33]. The extreme differences observed between AAA and control abdominal aorta are shown in Figure 1 and additional data [see additional file 2:Table II] for illustrative purposes, and to demonstrate the concordance of the results between Illumina and Affymetrix. (The top 100 genes were chosen to provide a readable list in the figure.) Increasing stringency in the selection of the differentially expressed genes resulted in greater concordance between the two platforms [90% (1,076/1,191) at FDR ≤ 0.001; 96% (465/485) at FDR ≤ 1.0 × 10-5]. There were more genes with decreased expression in AAA (1,793/3,274; 55%) than genes with increased expression (1,481/3,274; 45%). Therefore, we selected genes in proportion to increased (45%) and decreased (55%) expression in AAA for visualization (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Heatmap of the 100 most differentially expressed genes in AAA. To show consistency of the results between the two platforms, both Illumina (15 left columns) and Affymetrix (4 right columns) results are presented. Sample IDs are on top (see Table 1 for details) and gene symbols on the right. A listing of these 100 genes with expression values in both conditions as well as the FDR values is provided [see the additional file 2: Table II].

Isoform analysis on this dataset is limited due to the divergent nature of the arrays, i.e., the Affymetrix microarray used has probesets consisting of multiple oligos from a transcript making it difficult to calculate individual isoform contributions to the overall signal, while the Illumina platform has exact replicates with isoform information. Using the Illumina platform, 138 of the 3,274 (4%) genes on the DiffList had the largest differential signal from a particular isoform (as opposed to a general probe). An example of one such difference is in CD86 (CD86 antigen; Entrez Gene ID: 942), where the full length isoform is detected and increased significantly in AAA, while the shorter transcript variant is not detected in either condition, which indicates that CD86 is being transcribed by activated as opposed to nonactive monocytes [34].

We carried out real-time quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (Q-RT-PCR) validation for two genes, SOST (sclerosteosis) and RUNX3 (runt-related transcription factor 3) which each were significantly altered according to the microarray data (Figure 2). The Pearson correlation of the expression values between the Illumina microarray and Q-RT-PCR data was 0.89 for the exact replicates (AAA n = 6; control n = 7). Consistent with prior observations, there was a bias to underestimate the fold-change of highly differential genes in the microarray data (Illumina vs. Q-RT-PCR; SOST: 28 vs. 38; RUNX3: 10 vs. 13) [35].

Figure 2
figure 2

Q-RT-PCR results for RUNX3 and SOST in AAAs (n = 10) and control abdominal aortas (n = 10). Larger values of Max – ΔCT represent larger amounts of RNA present, and a change of this value by 1 represents a two-fold increase in the amount of mRNA. Medians are indicated by horizontal lines. See Table 1 for details on samples analyzed.

Inspection of the genes in Figure 1 revealed numerous genes involved in immune function with 24% having some connection to immunity (2/55 decreased; 22/45 increased). We subsequently analyzed the 3,274 genes in the DiffList for enrichment in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) categories [3638]. The analysis of KEGG pathways revealed 21 enriched non-metabolic pathways (Table 2). Enriched GO categories corresponded well with enriched KEGG pathways, with immune-related functions highly represented in both [e.g., the GO category "immune response" (GO:0006955) having an FDR= 2.08 x 10-14; not shown]. Since KEGG pathways provide more biological information in that they show molecular interactions, further analyses focused on KEGG pathways.

Table 2 KEGG biological pathways for differentially expressed genes

The enriched KEGG pathways are not independent of one another; many KEGG pathways refer to other KEGG pathways, i.e., the pathways interact. This interaction is illustrated in Figure 3. The relative size of each pathway in terms of the number of genes represented is indicated by the area of the circle, and the proportion of differentially expressed genes is indicated by the darker shaded segments. The pathway names in Figure 3 have been shortened and the abbreviations can be found in Table 2.

Figure 3
figure 3

Interactions of KEGG biological pathways for genes differentially expressed in AAA. The 21 most significant pathways are shown (see Table 2 for details). Areas represent pathway size (number of genes) and darker shades indicate the proportion of differentially expressed genes of the total number of genes in the pathway. See Methods section for details on how the interactions were identified.

The top five most enriched KEGG pathways are regulation of actin cytoskeleton (RAC; hsa04810; FDR= 4.71e-09), cell adhesion molecules (CAM; hsa04514; FDR= 1.63e-07), focal adhesion (FA; hsa04510; FDR= 1.98e-07), natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity (NK; hsa04650; FDR= 5.94e-06), and leukocyte transendothelial migration (LTEM; hsa04670; FDR= 1.06e-05), see Table 2.

The KEGG pathways RAC, CAM, and FA each participate in many aspects of biology and, therefore, each interact with several other KEGG pathways (see Figure 3). In the RAC pathway, 147/204 probed genes were expressed in either AAA or controls (AAA: 132; control: 134), and 76 of the expressed genes (51%) were differentially expressed between cases and controls. In the CAM pathway, 93/127 probed genes were expressed in either AAA or controls (AAA: 89; control: 73), and 51 of the expressed genes (55%) were differentially expressed between cases and controls. In the FA pathway, 158/208 probed genes were expressed in either AAA or controls (AAA: 151; control: 148), and 72 of the expressed genes (46%) were differentially expressed between cases and controls. There is considerable overlap between these three pathways and the NK and LTEM pathways in that 39 of the 127 (31%) genes in the CAM pathway are also in the NK and LTEM pathways. The RAC pathway shares 52 of its 204 (25%) genes with the NK and LTEM pathways, and the FA pathway shares 61 of its 208 (29%) genes with these two pathways.

NK and LTEM pathways (Table 2) are more detailed in their annotations in the KEGG database, and of the top five enriched pathways also have the most direct biological relevance to AAA. In the NK pathway (Figure 4), 86/127 probed genes were expressed in either AAA or controls (AAA: 84; control: 75). Altogether, 47/86 (55%) of the expressed genes were differentially expressed between cases and controls. In the LTEM pathway [see additional file 3: Figure I], 89/115 probed genes were expressed in either condition (AAA: 84; control: 79), and 43/89 (48%) were differentially expressed. Taken together, 75 distinct genes from these two pathways were differentially expressed between AAA and control, since 10 genes had membership in both KEGG pathways. It is also noteworthy that 7/75 (9.3%; CYBA, ITGAL, LCP2, PIK3CD, PTPN6, SYK, VAV1) were among the 100 most differentially expressed genes shown in Figure 1 and additional data [see additional file 2: Table II]. The expression values for all the probed genes, and FDR values for those significantly different in these pathways, are provided as additional data [see additional file 4: Table III and additional file 5: Table IV].

Figure 4
figure 4

Modified "natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity" (hsa04650) pathway from KEGG. Protein symbols were replaced by gene symbols to reflect gene-centric data. See key for explanation of colors and symbols. Gene symbols were not italicized for better legibility [see additional file 4: Table III for expression values of the genes in both conditions as well as the FDR value for those that were significantly different].

To illustrate the gene-based data, KEGG pathways were redrawn with genes instead of proteins as seen in Figure 4 and additional data [see additional file 3: Figure I]. This increased the complexity of the pathways, since multiple genes occasionally coded for a particular protein type (e.g. the NFAT proteins), or protein complex. In some instances where the original KEGG protein symbol referred to two or more genes, the genes had differential expression in opposite directions, i.e., some genes had reduced, and other genes increased expression. An example of this is Rac in the NK pathway where RAC1 is decreased in AAA (FDR= 5.28 × 10-4) and RAC2 is increased (FDR= 1.16 × 10-5). In the original KEGG pathway both of the RAC genes that link to the protein in the KEGG database are represented by the symbol "Rac", and therefore some of the information of the gene enrichment was unavailable even with biological annotation, prior to our modifications of the KEGG pathways.


Multiple etiological factors contribute to AAA, and its pathobiology is incompletely understood. Experiments with animal models such as the angiotensin II infusion, elastase perfusion, and calcium chloride exposure models [13], in combination with more detailed analysis of the condition in humans, are beginning to elucidate the pathobiology. The current study provides a comprehensive, global view of the gene expression in AAA and control aorta, and the pathway analyses presented extend previous findings and provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of AAA.

Genes such as MMP1,MMP9,IL1B,PLAU, PLAUR, and several cathepsin family members previously implicated in the pathogenesis of AAA were among the 3,274 differentially expressed genes. We selected 2 genes, RUNX3 and SOST, novel to AAA for further study since their expression was substantially different in opposing directions between AAA and control. SOST belongs to the DAN family of antagonists of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) superfamily and also antagonizes Wnt signaling [39, 40]. Its association with TGF-β is interesting since TGF-β is involved in the Marfan syndrome which has aortic dissection as a characteristic feature [41]. Wnt signaling is involved in many aspects of the vasculature including arterial response to angiotensin II, used to induce AAA in animal models [13]. Together, these lines of evidence suggest that SOST is important in AAA pathogenesis. RUNX3 also has a role in TGF-β signaling and apoptosis [42], and it is involved in the differentiation of T cells from CD4+ to CD8+ lineages [43].

The enrichment seen in biological pathways provides greater understanding of the processes that may be involved in AAA. This comprehensive approach of gene expression analysis, utilizing annotated pathways rather than isolated genes, as well as the interconnectedness of the pathways (Figure 3), gives a more global picture of the pathology involved in AAA. In addition, subtle changes can be understood, rather than overlooked, when examined in the context of biological processes. Not all pathways are equally informative; it should be noted that the enrichment of some pathways, e.g., RAC, CAM and FA, while highly interesting, lack the specificity of the smaller KEGG pathways, and consequently relevance to AAA is not as obvious. Since the number of overlapping genes in these three pathways and the NK and LTEM pathways was considerable, it is reasonable to conclude that the contribution of the immunological processes in AAA may also contribute to the observed enrichment of these pathways.

The NK pathway (Figure 4) is interesting because immune involvement has been implicated in AAA [25, 28, 4447]. The biological processes involved in mediating NK cytotoxicity are not restricted to NK cells alone, but are common to several types of cytotoxic immune cells, including cytotoxic T lymphocytes, NK T cells, and γδ T cells [48]. Although NK cells have been found in AAA tissue, they represent a small fraction of the immune cells present [25]. The gene expression levels in this pathway are likely to be the result of more than one cytotoxic cell type, and further work is necessary to determine the exact composition of the cellular infiltrate and their individual contributions to the increased levels of the genes in this pathway.

Several genes shown in the NK (Figure 4) and LTEM pathways [see additional file 3: Figure I] with dashed orange and purple outlines were identified as expressed exclusively in either AAA or control aorta, but had an FDR > 0.05, i.e., the genes did not pass the FDR ≤ 0.05 threshold for differential expression, but were interesting because their expression was not detectable in one of the conditions. Since the genes failed the FDR ≤ 0.05 threshold they were not included in the DiffList and, therefore, were not included in the pathway enrichment analyses. They are nevertheless noteworthy because of the specific expression in one of the two conditions.

There is increased expression of genes in the activation signaling that begins with KLRK1 (NKG2D) and HCST (DAP10). Although this signaling is activating, it does not utilize an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). Interestingly, the activation is specific for certain downstream intermediates while ITAM signaling is relatively insensitive to the isoform of the intermediates [49]. In particular, HCST signals through PLCG2 in preference to PLCG1, and through VAV1 in preference to either of the other two VAV genes [50, 51]. This phenomenon fits well with the observed expression patterns, since PLCG2 is significantly increased in AAA while PLCG1 is significantly decreased, and VAV1 is expressed (unlike VAV2) and is among the 100 most differential genes (see Figure 1).

Activation of the NK pathway is suggested by the expression of several of the end-products exclusively in AAA (PRF1, GZMB), as well as the significant increase of other end-products from this pathway (CASP3, BID). FAS ligand (FASLG) expression, another possible end-product of this pathway, was not detected. Since FASLG is not generally stored in the immune cells that utilize it [48], lack of expression indicates that the Fas/FasL system is unlikely to be involved in the pathology of AAA. Taken together, these findings fit well with the granule exocytosis pathway model of cytotoxicity, and support previous findings in AAA.

The process of immune cell infiltration represented by the LTEM pathway [see additional file 3: Figure I] is also biologically relevant to AAA. The presence of immune cells, as well as the cell types comprising the infiltrate, has previously been shown in AAA tissue [25, 28, 46]. We observed significantly increased expression of several molecules attributed to leukocytes (ITGB2, ITGAM, CXCR4) and in some cases a specificity to AAA (ITGAL, ITGA4, ITK, TXK; Figure 4). Also, the significant decrease of ITGB1 was seen previously [7], lending further credence to the changes demonstrated. These data not only confirm that different leukocytes are present in AAA tissue, but may help to identify the specific molecules involved in their infiltration of the aorta for future studies.

The data presented here confirm many of the findings of previous gene expression studies on AAA using smaller sets of genes. One study using spotted membrane macroarrays found that 104 of the 1,185 genes tested were differentially expressed in AAA [6]. Our data confirmed 41 (39%) of the 104 genes in that the same genes had significantly different expression and the expression was increased or decreased in the same condition, i.e., the differential expression was in the same direction [6]. Another macroarray study used the same array and found differences in 20 genes, of which our data confirmed 13 (65%) [7]. There were 13 differentially expressed genes in common between the two macroarray studies, and 10 of these (77%) were increased or decreased similarly and had an FDR ≤ 0.05 in our study. Our microarray study differs from the prior macroarray studies in array type and analytical techniques. Nevertheless, the high level of confirmation of previous observations provides validation for the current study.

Previous histological studies of AAA confirm many of the differences observed in our microarray data. For instance, the specific expression of perforin in AAA was previously seen using immunohistochemistry [52]. Also, the differential expression of IL8, confirmed in prior expression studies [6, 7], was previously validated by immunohistochemistry [45]. IL1B, among the most differentially expressed genes, was also found to be highly differential in comparisons of protein levels [47]. The consistency with protein data is useful since it shows that the expression differences are likely functional.

The present study has several limitations. One specific sample-related limitation is that the aneurysm tissue used came from very late-stage disease, when the aneurysm was large enough for surgery (≥ 5.5 cm). Since several studies have shown that the risks of surgical resection are not outweighed by the risk of rupture until an aneurysm is quite large (~5.5 cm), the only tissue available is from late-stage AAA. A time course of gene expression during aneurysm development could yield valuable results, but this is not possible with humans.

Bias may have been introduced in the study since our control tissue was derived from autopsies. Extensive quality control analyses revealed no detectable differences between AAA and control RNA [see additional file 6: Figure II and file 7: Figure III]. Post mortem changes in RNA have been studied and shown to have an effect on RNA integrity, but this is both tissue and time dependent and can be limited [53]. Despite these limitations, post mortem tissues have been used successfully for expression studies [53, 54].

Another sample-related limitation is that the mRNA was obtained from the entire control abdominal aorta and from the resected AAA; therefore, expression at specific sites or layers in the aorta or aneurysm cannot be identified. It is, however, impractical to obtain highly comparable, anatomically similar aneurysm and aorta tissue.

The incompleteness of gene annotation is yet another limitation of our study, since only 859 (26%) of the 3,274 differentially expressed genes had KEGG annotations and 2,615 (80%) of these genes had GO annotations. We, therefore, examined enrichment in both KEGG and GO annotations to assure consistency. Restricting the analysis to genes with GO and KEGG annotations limits our analyses, but provides greater functional interpretation. Isoforms also complicate the analysis and interpretation of microarray data. The Illumina Sentrix-6 array contains probes for various specific isoforms of only 1,935 genes. The biological information that these annotations can provide is valuable (such as the example of CD86 isoforms in the results), but limited not only by our knowledge (and the testability) of the transcript isoforms, but also by the biological understanding of what these differences indicate. Future reanalysis of the data, particularly of the genes that currently lack annotation and analysis of any new functional information concerning probed isoforms, will be useful.


In summary, the expression profiles presented here extend the evidence for involvement of immunity in non-inflammatory AAA. The substantially increased evidence for the role of cell-mediated cytotoxicity in AAA and the molecular signaling behind the infiltration of leukocytes, as well as the comprehensive annotation of the genes that are involved in these two pathways, add significantly to the understanding of AAA. Future work to ascertain the contributions of these expression changes to AAA should be undertaken. The results provided by this study offer new insights into AAA pathobiology which will help to direct future research as well as aid in the development of therapeutic options for the treatment of AAA.


Tissue samples, RNA isolation and microarray analysis

Full thickness aortic wall tissue specimens were collected in RNAlater (Ambion) from patients undergoing AAA repair operations at the Harper University Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. Control aortas were all collected within 24 h of death and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Control samples were matched to cases using sex, age, and ethnicity (Table 1). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, and the research carried out was in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

We isolated total RNA from blood vessels as previously described [5]. Quality of RNA was checked by Agilent Bioanalyzer and RNA Integrity Scores are shown in Table 1[55]. Sentrix Human-6 Whole Genome Expression BeadChips (Sentrix Human WG-6; Illumina) were used to identify genes expressed in AAA tissue (n= 6) and from individuals without AAA (controls; n= 7). We analyzed samples both individually as well as in pools. Further QC procedures included examination of raw and adjusted intensity histograms [see additional file 6: Figure II] and principal component analysis [see additional file 7: Figure III] to detect systematic bias. We used the "Detection Score" to determine expression using the Illumina platform. It is a statistical measure in the BeadStudio software (version, which is computed based on the Z-value of a gene relative to the Z-value of the negative controls. The Illumina data were adjusted ("normalized") using a cubic spline function. We identified genes differentially expressed in AAA [see additional file 1: Table I] using the Illumina custom error model implemented in BeadStudio. The expression difference score, DiffScore, takes into account background noise and sample variability [56]. The formula for the calculation of the DiffScore is:

DiffScore = 10 sgn(μ cond - μ ref )log10 (p)

For the Affymetrix microarray analysis, 10 μg of each RNA pool was processed and analyzed [57]. For the Affymetrix arrays, raw data were processed with the statistical language R using some of the packages provided by the Bioconductor project [58]. We used the GC-RMA algorithm for the adjustment of the data [59]. GC-RMA takes into account the GC content of the probe sequences when comparing the expression intensities of the different probesets.

To combine the Affymetrix and Illumina data, we identified a common reference gene set (RefList) of 18,057 distinct genes represented on both platforms (Affymetrix: n= 19,835 and Illumina: n= 20,054). Heatmaps showing differential expression, with green representing lower, and red higher, were generated using the programs Cluster and TreeView (version 1.0.12) [60].

The microarray data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (Series# GSE7084) [61].

Real-time quantitative-reverse-transcription PCR

Microarray-based mRNA expression was validated with RNA isolated from 10 AAAs and 10 controls (Table 1) by Q-RT-PCR for RUNX3 and SOST using validated TaqMan® assays available from Applied Biosystems. The Q-RT-PCR assays were performed using 50 ng of RNA as previously described [5].

Functional classification of genes

The differentially expressed gene set [see additional file 1: Table I] was used to identify enriched GO biological process categories using the GoHyperG function (GOStats, Bioconductor) and enrichment in KEGG biological pathways using WebGestalt (Web-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit) [3638, 62]. The reference gene set comprised the 18,057 distinct genes represented on both Affymetrix and Illumina arrays. The hypergeometric test was used for significance.

Inclusion in KEGG is limited to the proteins/genes with defined roles in biological processes. As of December 2006 only 3,768 (21%) of the RefList had KEGG annotations. A total of 13,026 (72%) had GO categories. The KEGG pathways are not entirely separate from one another. One example of this is the MAPK signaling pathway, which is a constituent component in several other biological pathways, such as the NK pathway. Within the pathways of the KEGG database there are multiple references to other KEGG pathways indicated by a rectangle with rounded corners inserted into the pathway diagrams (as can be seen in Figure 4). This interconnectedness information was manually extracted from the KEGG pathways. The nature and complexity of these interactions varied from pathway to pathway, and for simplicity a line connecting two KEGG pathways was used to represent these interactions. The interaction map was created using CytoScape software to generate a framework of the interactions of the enriched KEGG pathways, and the publication images were produced in Adobe Illustrator (version 12.0.1) [63].


  1. Ernst CB: Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 1993, 328 (16): 1167-1172. 10.1056/NEJM199304223281607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alcorn HG, Wolfson SK, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Kuller LH, O'Leary D: Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in older adults enrolled in The Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996, 16 (8): 963-970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuivaniemi H, Kyo Y, Lenk G, Tromp G: Genome-wide approach to finding abdominal aortic aneurysm susceptibility genes in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1085: 270-281. 10.1196/annals.1383.022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson RW: Reflections on the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cardiovasc Surg. 2002, 10 (4): 389-394. 10.1016/S0967-2109(02)00042-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tromp G, Gatalica Z, Skunca M, Berguer R, Siegel T, Kline RA, Kuivaniemi H: Elevated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004, 18 (4): 414-420. 10.1007/s10016-004-0050-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Absi TS, Sundt TM, Tung WS, Moon M, Lee JK, Damiano RR, Thompson RW: Altered patterns of gene expression distinguishing ascending aortic aneurysms from abdominal aortic aneurysms: complementary DNA expression profiling in the molecular characterization of aortic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003, 126 (2): 344-57; discission 357. 10.1016/S0022-5223(02)73576-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tung WS, Lee JK, Thompson RW: Simultaneous analysis of 1176 gene products in normal human aorta and abdominal aortic aneurysms using a membrane-based complementary DNA expression array. J Vasc Surg. 2001, 34 (1): 143-150. 10.1067/mva.2001.113310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazi M, Zhu C, Roy J, Paulsson-Berne G, Hamsten A, Swedenborg J, Hedin U, Eriksson P: Difference in matrix-degrading protease expression and activity between thrombus-free and thrombus-covered wall of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25 (7): 1341-1346. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000166601.49954.21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Platsoucas CD, Lu S, Nwaneshiudu I, Solomides C, Agelan A, Ntaoula N, Purev E, Li LP, Kratsios P, Mylonas E, Jung WJ, Evans K, Roberts S, Lu Y, Layvi R, Lin WL, Zhang X, Gaughan J, Monos DS, Oleszak EL, White JV: Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a specific antigen-driven T cell disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1085: 224-235. 10.1196/annals.1383.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duftner C, Seiler R, Dejaco C, Fraedrich G, Schirmer M: Increasing evidence for immune-mediated processes and new therapeutic approaches in abdominal aortic aneurysms--a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1085: 331-338. 10.1196/annals.1383.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuivaniemi H, Platsoucas CD, Tilson MD: Aortic Aneurysms: an Immune Disease with a Strong Genetic Component. Circulation. 2007, (in press):

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schirmer M, Duftner C, Seiler R, Dejaco C, Fraedrich G: Abdominal aortic aneurysms: an underestimated type of immune-mediated large vessel arteritis?. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2006, 18 (1): 48-53. 10.1097/01.bor.0000198001.35203.36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daugherty A, Cassis LA: Mouse models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004, 24 (3): 429-434. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000118013.72016.ea.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson RW, Curci JA, Ennis TL, Mao D, Pagano MB, Pham CT: Pathophysiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms: insights from the elastase-induced model in mice with different genetic backgrounds. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1085: 59-73. 10.1196/annals.1383.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eliason JL, Hannawa KK, Ailawadi G, Sinha I, Ford JW, Deogracias MP, Roelofs KJ, Woodrum DT, Ennis TL, Henke PK, Stanley JC, Thompson RW, Upchurch GR: Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Circulation. 2005, 112 (2): 232-240. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hannawa KK, Eliason JL, Woodrum DT, Pearce CG, Roelofs KJ, Grigoryants V, Eagleton MJ, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Myers DD, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR: L-selectin-mediated neutrophil recruitment in experimental rodent aneurysm formation. Circulation. 2005, 112 (2): 241-247. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.535625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong W, Zhao Y, Prall A, Greiner TC, Baxter BT: Key roles of CD4+ T cells and IFN-gamma in the development of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a murine model. J Immunol. 2004, 172 (4): 2607-2612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakashima H, Aoki M, Miyake T, Kawasaki T, Iwai M, Jo N, Oishi M, Kataoka K, Ohgi S, Ogihara T, Kaneda Y, Morishita R: Inhibition of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in the rat by use of decoy oligodeoxynucleotides suppressing activity of nuclear factor kappaB and ets transcription factors. Circulation. 2004, 109 (1): 132-138. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000105725.61763.A2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimizu K, Shichiri M, Libby P, Lee RT, Mitchell RN: Th2-predominant inflammation and blockade of IFN-gamma signaling induce aneurysms in allografted aortas. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114 (2): 300-308. 10.1172/JCI200419855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas M, Gavrila D, McCormick ML, Miller FJ, Daugherty A, Cassis LA, Dellsperger KC, Weintraub NL: Deletion of p47phox attenuates angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2006, 114 (5): 404-413. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.607168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshimura K, Aoki H, Ikeda Y, Fujii K, Akiyama N, Furutani A, Hoshii Y, Tanaka N, Ricci R, Ishihara T, Esato K, Hamano K, Matsuzaki M: Regression of abdominal aortic aneurysm by inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Nat Med. 2005, 11 (12): 1330-1338. 10.1038/nm1335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan WL, Pejnovic N, Liew TV, Hamilton H: Predominance of Th2 response in human abdominal aortic aneurysm: mistaken identity for IL-4-producing NK and NKT cells?. Cell Immunol. 2005, 233 (2): 109-114. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2005.04.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen JR, Keegan L, Sarfati I, Danna D, Ilardi C, Wise L: Neutrophil chemotaxis and neutrophil elastase in the aortic wall in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Invest Surg. 1991, 4 (4): 423-430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Curci JA, Liao S, Huffman MD, Shapiro SD, Thompson RW: Expression and localization of macrophage elastase (matrix metalloproteinase-12) in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Clin Invest. 1998, 102 (11): 1900-1910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ocana E, Bohorquez JC, Perez-Requena J, Brieva JA, Rodriguez C: Characterisation of T and B lymphocytes infiltrating abdominal aortic aneurysms. Atherosclerosis. 2003, 170 (1): 39-48. 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00282-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caligiuri G, Rossignol P, Julia P, Groyer E, Mouradian D, Urbain D, Misra N, Ollivier V, Sapoval M, Boutouyrie P, Kaveri SV, Nicoletti A, Lafont A: Reduced immunoregulatory CD31+ T cells in patients with atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26 (3): 618-623. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000200380.73876.d9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Duftner C, Seiler R, Klein-Weigel P, Gobel H, Goldberger C, Ihling C, Fraedrich G, Schirmer M: High prevalence of circulating CD4+CD28- T-cells in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25 (7): 1347-1352. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000167520.41436.c0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Forester ND, Cruickshank SM, Scott DJ, Carding SR: Increased natural killer cell activity in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2006, 93 (1): 46-54. 10.1002/bjs.5215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearce WH, Shively VP: Abdominal aortic aneurysm as a complex multifactorial disease: interactions of polymorphisms of inflammatory genes, features of autoimmunity, and current status of MMPs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1085: 117-132. 10.1196/annals.1383.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Badger SA, Soong CV, O'Donnell ME, Middleton D: The role of human leukocyte antigen genes in the formation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2007, 45 (3): 475-480. 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hirose H, Tilson MD: Abdominal aortic aneurysm as an autoimmune disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001, 947: 416-418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Barnes M, Freudenberg J, Thompson S, Aronow B, Pavlidis P: Experimental comparison and cross-validation of the Affymetrix and Illumina gene expression analysis platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (18): 5914-5923. 10.1093/nar/gki890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Benjamini Y, Hochberg JR: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B. 1995, 57: 289-300.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jeannin P, Magistrelli G, Aubry JP, Caron G, Gauchat JF, Renno T, Herbault N, Goetsch L, Blaecke A, Dietrich PY, Bonnefoy JY, Delneste Y: Soluble CD86 is a costimulatory molecule for human T lymphocytes. Immunity. 2000, 13 (3): 303-312. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00030-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuen T, Wurmbach E, Pfeffer RL, Ebersole BJ, Sealfon SC: Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30 (10): e48-10.1093/nar/30.10.e48.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang B, Kirov S, Snoddy J: WebGestalt: an integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Web Server issue): W741-8. 10.1093/nar/gki475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000, 25 (1): 25-29. 10.1038/75556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanehisa M, Goto S: KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1): 27-30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brunkow ME, Gardner JC, Van Ness J, Paeper BW, Kovacevich BR, Proll S, Skonier JE, Zhao L, Sabo PJ, Fu Y, Alisch RS, Gillett L, Colbert T, Tacconi P, Galas D, Hamersma H, Beighton P, Mulligan J: Bone dysplasia sclerosteosis results from loss of the SOST gene product, a novel cystine knot-containing protein. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 68 (3): 577-589. 10.1086/318811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Semenov M, Tamai K, He X: SOST is a ligand for LRP5/LRP6 and a Wnt signaling inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (29): 26770-26775. 10.1074/jbc.M504308200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Judge DP, Dietz HC: Marfan's syndrome. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9501): 1965-1976. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67789-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chi XZ, Yang JO, Lee KY, Ito K, Sakakura C, Li QL, Kim HR, Cha EJ, Lee YH, Kaneda A, Ushijima T, Kim WJ, Ito Y, Bae SC: RUNX3 suppresses gastric epithelial cell growth by inducing p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression in cooperation with transforming growth factor {beta}-activated SMAD. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25 (18): 8097-8107. 10.1128/MCB.25.18.8097-8107.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Taniuchi I, Osato M, Egawa T, Sunshine MJ, Bae SC, Komori T, Ito Y, Littman DR: Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell. 2002, 111 (5): 621-633. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01111-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shimizu K, Mitchell RN, Libby P: Inflammation and cellular immune responses in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26 (5): 987-994. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000214999.12921.4f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Treska V, Kocova J, Boudova L, Neprasova P, Topolcan O, Pecen L, Tonar Z: Inflammation in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysm and its role in the symptomatology of aneurysm. Cytokines Cell Mol Ther. 2002, 7 (3): 91-97. 10.1080/13684730310001652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan WL, Pejnovic N, Hamilton H, Liew TV, Popadic D, Poggi A, Khan SM: Atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm and the interaction between autologous human plaque-derived vascular smooth muscle cells, type 1 NKT, and helper T cells. Circ Res. 2005, 96 (6): 675-683. 10.1161/01.RES.0000160543.84254.f1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pearce WH, Sweis I, Yao JS, McCarthy WJ, Koch AE: Interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha release in normal and diseased human infrarenal aortas. J Vasc Surg. 1992, 16 (5): 784-789. 10.1067/mva.1992.37640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Russell JH, Ley TJ: Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002, 20: 323-370. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100201.131730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Upshaw JL, Leibson PJ: NKG2D-mediated activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes: unique signaling pathways and distinct functional outcomes. Semin Immunol. 2006, 18 (3): 167-175. 10.1016/j.smim.2006.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cella M, Fujikawa K, Tassi I, Kim S, Latinis K, Nishi S, Yokoyama W, Colonna M, Swat W: Differential requirements for Vav proteins in DAP10- and ITAM-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (6): 817-823. 10.1084/jem.20031847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Upshaw JL, Schoon RA, Dick CJ, Billadeau DD, Leibson PJ: The isoforms of phospholipase C-gamma are differentially used by distinct human NK activating receptors. J Immunol. 2005, 175 (1): 213-218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Henderson EL, Geng YJ, Sukhova GK, Whittemore AD, Knox J, Libby P: Death of smooth muscle cells and expression of mediators of apoptosis by T lymphocytes in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 1999, 99 (1): 96-104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kuliwaba JS, Fazzalari NL, Findlay DM: Stability of RNA isolated from human trabecular bone at post-mortem and surgery. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1740 (1): 1-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Franz H, Ullmann C, Becker A, Ryan M, Bahn S, Arendt T, Simon M, Paabo S, Khaitovich P: Systematic analysis of gene expression in human brains before and after death. Genome Biol. 2005, 6 (13): R112-10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-r112.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, Lightfoot S, Menzel W, Granzow M, Ragg T: The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol. 2006, 7: 3-10.1186/1471-2199-7-3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chudin E, Kruglyak S, Baker SC, Oeser S, Barker D, McDaniel TK: A model of technical variation of microarray signals. J Comput Biol. 2006, 13 (4): 996-1003. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Haddad R, Tromp G, Kuivaniemi H, Chaiworapongsa T, Kim YM, Mazor M, Romero R: Human spontaneous labor without histologic chorioamnionitis is characterized by an acute inflammation gene expression signature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 195 (2): 394 e1-24. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5 (10): R80-10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu Z, Irizarry RA: Stochastic models inspired by hybridization theory for short oligonucleotide arrays. J Comput Biol. 2005, 12 (6): 882-893. 10.1089/cmb.2005.12.882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (25): 14863-14868. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. GEO: GEO. []

  62. WebGestalt: WebGestalt. []

  63. Cytoscape: Cytoscape. []

Download references


We thank Dr. Susan Land, Daniel Lott and Sara McNorton at the Applied Genomics Technology Center of Wayne State University for their work on microarray and Q-RT-PCR experiments. This project was funded in part by American Heart Association predoctoral fellowships (0510063Z and 0710099Z to G.M.L and 0410051Z to S.W.), and a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL064310 to H.K.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helena Kuivaniemi.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

GML designed experiments, prepared RNA samples for microarray and Q-RT-PCR, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. GT contributed to the experimental design, statistical analysis, computational aspects, and drafting of the manuscript. SW contributed to the experimental design and data analysis. ZG obtained and processed the control tissue. RB obtained and processed the aneurysmal tissue. HK contributed to the experimental design, data analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. HK also obtained funding for the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Genes included in DiffList. Gene symbols, Entrez Gene IDs, gene names, signals, and significance of differential expression provided in a tabular format for all 3,274 genes on the DiffList. Gene symbols and Entrez Gene IDs contain links to the NCBI site. (PDF 2 MB)


Additional file 2: Top 100 most differential genes. The 100 genes included in Figure 1 arranged alphabetically by symbol with gene symbols, Entrez gene IDs, gene names, signals, p-value, and FDR given for the top 100 genes using the group comparisons from Illumina. (PDF 275 KB)


Additional file 3: Modified "leukocyte transendothelial migration" (hsa04670) pathway from KEGG. Protein symbols were replaced by gene symbols to reflect gene-centric data. See key for explanation of colors and symbols (see the additional file Table IV for expression values of the genes in both conditions as well as the FDR value for those that were significantly different). (PDF 3 MB)


Additional file 4: Expression values and significance of differential expression for individual genes included in the NK cytotoxicity pathway in Figure 4. Gene symbols, Entrez Gene IDs, gene names, signals, and significance of differential expression provided in a tabular format for NK cytotoxicity pathway. Gene symbols and Entrez Gene IDs contain links to the NCBI site. (PDF 731 KB)


Additional file 5: Expression values and significance of differential expression for individual genes included in the LTEM pathway in Figure 5. Gene symbols, Entrez Gene IDs, gene names, signals, and significance of differential expression provided in a tabular format for LTEM pathway. Gene symbols and Entrez Gene IDs contain links to the NCBI site. (PDF 688 KB)


Additional file 6: Signal intensity histograms. Unadjusted, i.e. raw, signals from microarray experiments were converted into histograms to visualize the lack of patterns of bias. (PDF 250 KB)


Additional file 7: Principal component analysis. Principal component analysis was carried out on the microarray data to show that there was no systematic bias in the samples. (PDF 218 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lenk, G.M., Tromp, G., Weinsheimer, S. et al. Whole genome expression profiling reveals a significant role for immune function in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. BMC Genomics 8, 237 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: