Skip to main content

The UDP-glucosyltransferase multigene family in Bombyx mori



Glucosidation plays a major role in the inactivation and excretion of a great variety of both endogenous and exogenous compounds. A class of UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) is involved in this process. Insect UGTs play important roles in several processes, including detoxication of substrates such as plant allelochemicals, cuticle formation, pigmentation, and olfaction. Identification and characterization of Bombyx mori UGT genes could provide valuable basic information for this important family and explain the detoxication mechanism and other processes in insects.


Taking advantage of the newly assembled genome sequence, we performed a genome-wide analysis of the candidate UGT family in the silkworm, B. mori. Based on UGT signature and their similarity to UGT homologs from other organisms, we identified 42 putative silkworm UGT genes. Most of them are clustered on the silkworm chromosomes, with two major clusters on chromosomes 7 and 28, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis of these identified 42 UGT protein sequences revealed five major groups. A comparison of the silkworm UGTs with homologs from other sequenced insect genomes indicated that some UGTs are silkworm-specific genes. The expression patterns of these candidate genes were investigated with known expressed sequence tags (ESTs), microarray data, and RT-PCR method. In total, 36 genes were expressed in tissues examined and showed different patterns of expression profile, indicating that these UGT genes might have different functions.


B. mori possesses a largest insect UGT gene family characterized to date, including 42 genes. Phylogenetic analysis, genomic organization and expression profiles provide an overview for the silkworm UGTs and facilitate their functional studies in future.


All organisms live in an environment that contains natural and man-made potentially harmful chemicals. Extensive studies of detoxification in the vertebrate liver provide a framework to the study of detoxification mechanisms in other systems [13]. Several biotransformation enzymes participate in the detoxification process, they are cytochrome P450 superfamily [4, 5], short chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR)1 family [6], glutathione S-transferases [7] and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases [2].

Biotransformation enzymes related to those found in vertebrates have also been found in insects and are likely to play equally important roles. Cytochrome P450s and glutathione S-transferases in particular have been implicated in insect resistance to pesticides [8]. UDP-glucuronosyltransferases are part of a superfamily of UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs, EC2.4.1.-) that are found in all living organisms, including animals, plants, bacteria and viruses, suggesting an ancient origin [911]. UGTs are a superfamily of enzymes that mediate the transfer of glycosyl residues from activated nucleotide sugars to acceptor molecules (aglycones), thus regulating properties of the acceptors such as their bioactivity, solubility and transport within the cell and throughout the organism. The UDP-sugar may be UDP-glucuronic acid, UDP-galactose, UDP-glucose, or UDP-xylose.

The mammalian UGTs using UDP-glucuronic acid as a glycosyl donor have attracted considerable attention in pharmaceutical and clinical research due to their central role in the detoxification of foreign chemicals such as carcinogens and hydrophobic drugs. These enzymes are located in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and are membrane-bound protein. In addition to the detoxication of exogenous substrates, they are involved in a range of other physiological processes, including olfaction and metabolism of bile acids and steroids [12].

Like plant UGTs, insect UGT enzymes also use UDP-glucose rather than UDP-glucuronic acid as sugar donor [1315]. Also, similar to the vertebrates, both endogenous and exogenous substrates are subject to glucosidation in insects. UGT activity on endogenous and exogenous compounds has been reported in a range of insect species [16]. Insect UGTs play an important role in detoxication of plant allelochemicals encountered by many insects in their diets [14]. Consequently, UGT-catalyzed biotransformation of xenobiotics has been implicated in some cases of insecticide resistance [17]. In addition, insect UGTs play important roles in several processes, including cuticle formation, pigmentation, and olfaction [1820]. However, only limited molecular information on insect UGTs is available.

Genome sequencing projects offer a new route into understanding multigene families both within a single species and across different species. In the present study, we have used the newly assembled 9× coverage genome sequence to characterize the UGT multigene family in silkworm. In total, the 42 putative silkworm UGTs were identified. The phylogenetic relationships among these genes and the homologs from the sequenced insect genomes were analyzed. Searching available ESTs and microarray data, we found that 36 of 42 silkworm UGTs were expressed in different tissues, suggesting that these genes are active and may have different functions. In addition, the genomic structures of silkworm UGT genes were also investigated. Our data provide the preliminary insights into evolution and functions of the silkworm UGTs. This is the first time to describe this gene family in a Lepidoptera species. The results may have important implications for the study of insect UGTs.


The UGT family number of silkworm

A signature sequence involved in the binding of the UDP moiety of the nucleotide sugar has been identified as a characteristic of UGT sequences from a range of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. To gain insight into the size of the UGT family in the silkworm, the amino acid sequence corresponding to this signature motif in insect UGTs was used to screen the predicted silkworm protein database. The reported amino acid sequences of Drosophila melanogaste r UGTs were also used as queries for the BLASTP searches. We ultimately identified 42 UGT genes from the silkworm genome (Table 1). The signature motifs are well conserved in the silkworm UGT genes (Figure 1). Similarly, we also identified 22 and 12 UGT genes from Anopheles gambiae and Apis mellifera genomes, respectively. It has been reported that there are 33 UGTs in the D. melanogaster genome. It is obvious that the B. mori genome contains more members of the UGT family compared with A. gambiae, A. mellifera, and D. melanogaster. Among all of the identified silkworm UGT sequences, the N-terminal region is more variable than the C-terminal region where the signature sequence resides.

Table 1 Summary of the silkworm UGTs. UN indicates the unknown chromosome locations of the UGTs.
Figure 1

The signature motif of silkworm 42 UGT genes. Alignment of UGT amino acid sequences. Black and grey indicate identical and similar amino acids, respectively. Multiple sequence alignment was performed with CLUSTALW and amino-acid shading with BOXSHADE 3.21 A consensus is indicated in the region of the UGT signature sequence. (FVA)-(LIVMF)-(TS)-(HQ)-(SGAC)-G- X(2) -(STG)-X(2)- (DE)-X(6)-P-(LIVMFA)-(LIVMFA)-X(2)-P-(LMVFIQ)-X(2)- (DE)-Q, (all amino acids that can concur at a given position are listed inside brackets; X indicted any amino acid; reviewed in [10])

Phylogeny of the silkworm UGT superfamily

Phylogenetic tree of silkworm UGTs was reconstructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method using a conserved C-terminal region. 5 major groups were defined by this method with high bootstrap supports, we named them groups I-V (Figure 2). Group I contains 12 UGTs; all these genes are tandem arranged on chromosome 7 (Figure 3). Group II contains 3 UGTs; BmUGT003817 and BmUGT003835 are located on chromosome 24, but genomic position of BmUGT001338 is unknown due to the quality of the silkworm genome sequence. Group III also contains 3 genes; BmUGT005442 and BmUGT005443 are tandem repeated on chromosome 8, while BmUGT005046 is located on chromosome 25. Group IV contains 6 UGTs; except for that the genomic locations of BmUGT014622 and BmUGT1566 are unknown, other 4 genes are located on chromosome 18 (Figure 3). Group V is the largest group that contains 16 genes; 13 of them are tandem arranged on chromosome 28 (Figure 3), and BmUGT009788, BmUGT007327, and BmUGT004965 are located on chromosomes 2, 3 and 25, respectively. Gene BmUGT002854 is located on chromosome 10, and it has the special intron position (Figure 4). The phylogenetic analysis also shows that this gene was not clustered with other silkworm UGT genes. Most of members of group I come from the same chromosome, whereas groups II and V are composed of genes located on different chromosomes.

Compared with D. melanogaster (33 UGTs), A. gambiae (22 UGTs), and A. mellifera (12 UGTs), the silkworm UGTs were greatly expanded in number. From the molecular phylogenetic tree of B. mori, D. melanogaster, A. gambiae, A. mellifera UGTs (Figure 2) we can see that group C, D, and E, which defined by D. melanogaster UGTs, were Diptera-specific classes, and that they were clustered by D. melanogaster and A. gambiae UGTs only. The silkworm groups III and IV are clustered with D. melanogaster groups A and B, respectively, and each cluster also contains A. gambiae and A. mellifera UGT genes. This indicates that group A and B are common in Lepidoptera, Diptera and Hymenoptera. In group A, BmUGT005046 was a probable ortholog of Am15665 because they were phylogenetically closely related (bootstrap value of 95%). BmUGT005046, BmUGT005442, BmUGT005443, and Am12751, Am15163, Am12492, Am10367 formed a cluster, supported by a bootstrap value 67% (Figure 2), suggesting that these genes may have a common ancestor. In addition, BmUGT005442 and BmUGT005443 are tandem repeated on chromosome 8. Thus, BmUGT005442 and BmUGT005443 might be created through local duplication. The similar phenomenon was also observed in group B. Groups I, II, and V were silkworm-specific classes. They did not form respective clusters with other insect UGTs; genes of each group were tandem repeated on chromosomes. This indicated that most of UGTs might experience lineage-specific expansion in the silkworm.

Figure 2

Neighbour-joining tree of B. mori , A. gambiae , A. mellifera and D. melanogaster UGTs. Phylogentic tree was reconstructed with MEGA 4 program. Genetic distance was computed based on Jones-Taylor-Thornton model and gaps were deleted with pairwise deletion method. Bootstrap values (1000 replicates) lower than 50% were omitted. B. mori (Bm), A. gambiae (Ag), A. mellifera (Am) and D. melanogaster (CG) UGTs were presented by red, pink, black, and blue, respectively.

Figure 3

The positions of B. mori UGT genes on chromosome. The black arrow indicates the transcription direction of UGTs. Only the chromosomes that have more than 2 UGTs were shown.

Figure 4

Distribution of introns among 42 UGTgenes of B. mori. The introns are mapped and numbered to the alignment of their amino acid sequences. Black solid lines indicate positions of introns that are found or predicted in the corresponding genes. The numbers on the top of the map show the intron insertion number occurred on each gene.

Genomic distribution of UGTs in silkworm

39 of the 42 identified silkworm UGT genes were dispersed on 10 chromosomes and 3 genes on unmapped scaffolds. The distinctive feature of the silkworm UGT family is the grouping of genes into clusters with size ranging from 1 to 13 genes per cluster on different chromosomes (Figure 3) (The chromosomes with less than 3 UGTs not shown). The genes in any particular cluster often show a high degree of sequence similarity each other. There are two major gene clusters, located on chromosomes 7 and 28, which contain 12 and 13 genes, respectively. In addition, there are 4 UGT genes located on chromosome 18. Each of chromosomes 8 and 24 contains 2 UGT genes, while each of chromosomes 2, 3, 10, 12, and 25 has one gene.

There are also clear examples of transpositional gene duplications in the silkworm UGT family. For example, BmUGT005046, BmUGT005442, and BmUGT005443 were of the same group III but located on different chromosomes. In the group V, the gene BmUGT004965, BmUGT007327, and BmUGT009788 are respectively located on chromosomes 25, 3, and 2.

Intron gain and loss as well as intron positions and sizes of silkworm UGTs

Our study revealed that all of 42 silkworm UGTs contained introns. Comparing intron positions with sequence relationships revealed by phylogenetic analysis, about eight independent intron insertion events appear to have happened in the course of the silkworm UGT evolution (Figure 4). The widespread and probably the oldest intron is intron 6, which is found in all of 42 silkworm UGT genes. All other introns are found to be gained or lost only within a single restricted subgroup or in only a single gene. This suggests a general pattern of intron gain during evolution of the UGT gene family. A clear case of one recent intron loss is seen in the group I. Eight genes of this group contain 7 introns, while other four genes have 6 introns. It is likely that the lost one is intron 7, which exists in all other 38 UGTs. This implies that an intron loss event might have occurred after the gene duplication.

In total, at least 180 introns could be identified for the 42 silkworm UGT genes (Figure 4). Each group revealed by phylogenetic analysis almost has the same intron number and the intron positions. Most members of group I have 7 introns with numbers from 2 to 8, while genes BmUGT010295, BmUGT010098, BmUGT010099, and BmUGT010099-2 contain 6 introns, which lost intron 7. The members of group II also contain 7 introns and their intron positions are the same as those of the group I. Each gene of group III contains 3 introns and their intron positions are 3, 6, and 7. Each gene of groups IV and V also contains 3 introns, but the intron positions were different from group III; they were 6, 7, and 8 (Figure 4). BmUGT 002854 contains 6 introns. This gene has the special intron position 1. The silkworm UGTs have more introns compared with Drosophila UGTs.

Intron size of silkworm UGTs ranged from several decades bp to ten thousands bp, and its average was about 1700 bp. About 58.3% of the silkworm UGT introns have sizes > 1000 bp. The silkworm UGTs have longer introns compared with the introns of D. melanogaster UGTs (Figure 5), which the majority of introns were 50–99 bp long.

Figure 5

Distribution of the B. mori and D. melanogaster UGTs intron length.

Expression of silkworm UGT genes

The expression of the identified silkworm UGT genes was analyzed with known ESTs and microarray data. Of all putative silkworm UGT genes, 29 have expression evidence confirmed by microarray data and 24 have EST evidence. In total, 36 genes were expressed. According to microarray analysis we know that 21 genes have transcribed activity. Among them 16 genes were transcribed in midgut. BmUGT013829, BmUGT014622, BmUGT001338, BmUGT003817, and BmUGT003835 were widely expressed in silkworm tissues. Some genes were expressed in a tissue-specific pattern, for example, BmUGT004965 and BmUGT010289 were specifically expressed in silk gland. BmUGT013834 and so on were merely expressed in midgut. While BmUGT013860-2, BmUGT010100 and BmUGT002854 were only expressed in two tissues midgut and malpighian tubules. However, eight genes were not expressed in 3-day-old fifth-instar larvae tissues based on microarray data, such as BmUGT013833, BmUGT010288 and BmUGT005442 (Figure 6). The RT-PCR was also done to analyze tissue expression patterns of some representative UGT genes on the fifth-instar day 3 larvae. The tissues included testis, ovary, head, integument, fat body, midgut, haemocyte, malpighian tubules and silk glands, which the same with microarray data detected. The results further confirmed these observations (Figure 7A).

Figure 6

Expression levels for silkworm UGT genes in different tissues of 3 day 5th larvae by microarray analysis. Red color represent positive; black color represent zero; green color represent negative; gray color represent missing.

Figure 7

A Tissue expression patterns of some typical silkworm UGTs in multiple tissues on day 3 of the fifth instar. RT-PCR amplification of total RNA with BmUGT-specific oligonucleotides. Ha, haemocyte; Ma, Malpighian tubules; In, integument, Fa, fat body; Si, silk gland; He, head; Te, testis; Ov, ovary; Mi, midgut. The silkworm cytoplasmic actin A3 gene (Bmactin3; GenBank accession no. U49854) was used as internal control, and denoted by A3. B – Tissue expression patterns of BmUGT013829 gene in adult tissues. Te, testis; Wi, wing; Ba, baenosome; Ab, abdomen; Ov, ovary; Fa, fat body; Ad, adult antenna; La, larval antenna.


Taking advantage of the newly assembled silkworm genome sequence, we identified the 42 putative members of UGT genes, including a reported silkworm UGT gene. The number of UGT genes in silkworm is larger than D. melanogaster UGTs, which contain 33 genes [21]. While in plant of Arabidopsis there are about 120 UGTs and mammalian UGT gene superfamily currently has 117 members, they are all quite larger number than insects [22].

Both plant and mammalian UGT sequences contained a signature sequence–a UDP-glycosyltransferase signature: (FVA) - (LIVMF) - (TS) - (HQ) - (SGAC) - G - X(2)- (STG) -X(2)- (DE) - X(6) - P - (LIVMFA) - (LIVMFA) - X(2) - P - (LMVFIQ) -X(2)- (DE) - Q (all amino acids that can occur at a given position are listed inside brackets; X indicated any amino acid [11]). It was reported that this motif has been identified in a range of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. There is no exception of insects UGTs. The signature motif is located on C-terminal of the protein sequence.

So far all the identified UGTs comprise two major functional domains [23]. The N-terminal half, believed to be responsible for binding the aglycone, tends to be less conserved than the C-terminal half, which is thought to bind the UDP-sugar. Aglycones bound by UGTs are highly diverse, hence the low amino acid sequence conservation in the N-terminal region between the members of this family. The silkworm UGTs followed the same pattern, with the C-terminal half showing the highest similarity to other UGTs.

The best-characterised UGTs are the mammalian UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, which transfer glucuronic acid to hydrophobic substrates. These enzymes localized in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and are membrane-bound [24]. Mammalian UGTs have two functional motifs are thought to be important for the topology of proteins within the cell. One is the mammalian UGTs contain the N-terminal signal sequence cleaved on cotranslational segregation into the endoplasmic reticulum [25, 26]. The other is the putative hydrophobic transmembrane domain located near the carboxyl terminus of the protein, this domain anchors the enzymes to the membrane region [27, 25, 28, 29]. The major portion of the protein is located in the ER lumen, including the proposed substrate-binding domains and the catalytic site. The silkworm UGTs also have these domains, an N-terminus signal sequence and hydrophobic transmembrane domain either in N-terminal or C-terminal or in both terminals. Thus, these genes are most likely to be anchored in the endoplasmic reticulum. However, no such motif was identified in Arabidopsis UGTs [22], supporting that the plant UGTs are cytoplasmic enzymes, different from insect and mammalian UGTs.

42 members of the silkworm UGT gene family scattered on 10 chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis of these genes defined 5 consistent groups. The genes on each cluster often show a high degree of sequence similarity. This suggests that several gene duplication events took place during the evolution of this family. These duplication events included both tandem events, where the duplicated copies remain adjacent to each other, and transpositional events, where one copy is translocated to a different chromosomal location. Examples of both types of event can be seen in the clade including BmUGT007327, BmUGT002854 and BmUGT009788.

At least 180 introns were identified in 42 silkworm UGTs; the average introns number of each gene is 4.5. However, in D. melanogaster each UGT genes have 1.8 introns, quite smaller number than silkworm UGTs; the size of UGTs from the two organisms are similar, all about 500 amino acids. The increase of number of introns in silkworm UGTs is probably due to a fact that the silkworm genome harbors a large proportion of repetitive sequences. And the majority of these repetitive sequences were transposable elements or the remainders of transposable elements. Insertions of transposition into the introns might result in the increase of their lengths.

The micoarray data and RT-PCR results from fifth-instar day 3 larvae tissues showed that the silkworm UGT genes exhibited widely different patterns of expression. Different expression profiles indicate that these UGT genes might have different functions. BmUGT001338 and BmUGT003817 were expressed in all most tissues and different developmental stages according to microarray data, this indicated that these genes might have important functions in silkworm development and play the housekeeping role. The RT-PCR results showed that BmUGT010286 were transcripted in all the tissues, just a low expression was observed in head, silk glands, testis and ovary and possessed similar tissue expression pattern with BmUGT1, which reported play a major role in detoxication responses [30]. In addition the two genes located on the same chromosome and may have a common ancestor and phylogenetic tree showed that they were classified into a sub-group. These indicated that BmUGT010286 might involved in the detoxication of plant allelochemicals. B. mori larvae take up flavonoids into their cocoons from the leaves of their host plant, the mulberry tree (Morus alba) [31], but the flavonoids in mulberry tree leaves were different from that which isolated from the cocoon shell of the silkworm [32]. In insects, the formation of glucoside is the predominant pathway for dietary flavonoids [3336], and the glucosylation of polyphenolics in insects is catalyzed by UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) [14, 15], B. mori UGTs changed the flavonoids glucose conjugation positions from 3-O-glucoside to 5-O-glucoside or other forms to increase fitness for their own. Since a flavonoid 5-O-glucoside has not yet been reported in plants to other animals. Transfer a glucose moiety to the C-5 position of the flavonols, is functioning in B. mori [37]. It also was reported that quercetin 5-O-glucoside was the predominant metabolite in the midgut tissue, while quercetin 5,4'-di-O-glucoside was the major constituent in the haemocyte and silk glands [37]. The genes were highly or specific expressed in silk glands, midgut and haemlymph such as BmUGT010289, BmUGT004965, BmUGT013859, BmUGT003835, BmUGT013829, BmUGT013830, BmUGT013860, BmUGT013834, BmUGT010286 might have functions in flavonoids metabolism in silkworm. This may be a very important function for silkworm and further study should be needed to confirm this inference in future. The RT-PCR results also indicted that BmUGT003835 gene was highly expressed in testis, ovary, integument, fat body, midgut, malpighian tubules and with lower expression in head, but hardly detectable in haemocyte and silk glands. This expression profile suggested this gene might have some functions in detoxication since the intergument, fat body, and midgut are the main tissues correspond to such activity. We know little about what roles this gene plays in the testis and ovary. It is interesting and worthy of further study. In D. melanogaster, there were several UGT genes involved in olfaction; they were preferentially expressed in the third antennal segment of D. melanogaster [20]. Both microarray data and RT-PCR indicated that BmUGT013829 has high expression levels in silkworm head and RT-PCR also shows that this gene is highly expressed in larval and adult antennae (Figure 7B), suggesting that this gene may be involved in olfaction, but the expression of this gene is not antennae-specific. It can be also detected in fat body and integument, suggesting this gene may have other functions. With more and more insects UGT genes were identified, individual silkworm UGTs functions can initially be determined through bioinformatic studies that reveal homology to genes encoding enzymes of known catalytic activity.

It is known that many plant phenolics can act as toxins or feeding deterrents to insects and thus play an important role in plant defense against herbivorous insects. The detoxication of ingested plant phenolics is believed to be one of the principle functions of insect UGT enzymes [14]. Compared with A. gambiae, D. melanogaster, and A. mellifera UGTs, B. mori has more UGTs. Probably this is the result of competition between silkworm and its only diet mulberry leaf. In order to defense B. mori, mulberry leaf can produce some toxicant chemicals, while B. mori can also evolve some mechanism to detoxicate the chemicals. UGTs probably are involved in this process, so the number of the silkworm UGTs was expanded and also produce the silkworm-specific UGT genes.


Biochemical evidence and comparisons with mammalian and other systems point to a range of important functions for the UGT genes of this family. Our results indicate that the B. mori contains the largest insect UGT gene family characterized to date compared with other insects. The data presented in this study provide an overview for the silkworm UGTs and facilitate their functional studies in future.


Identification of silkworm UGT members

The new version of the silkworm genome sequence and predicted protein database were used in the present analysis Complete protein sequences of A. gambiae and A. mellifera were downloaded from Ensemble (AgamP3.45) and BeeBase (release 2), respectively.

UGT protein sequences of D. melanogaster were downloaded from the GenBank and used as queries to perform BLASTP searches against the silkworm predicted protein database and TBLASTN searches against the silkworm 9× genome sequence. A UGT signature motif in a known silkworm UGT gene and D. melanogaster UGTs was also used in a TBLASN search. We collected all the candidates if they have UGT signature motif that also exists in plants and mammals. We also used the program SMART to identify whether UDPGT domain exists in the protein sequences encoding by the candidate genes. The same methods were used for identification of the A. gambiae and A. mellifera UGT genes. Genomic sequences that showed even weak sequence similarity to any query sequence and its flanking regions were extracted, and put into Softberry database for predicting new genes by using FGENESH program taking the available insect (A. gambiae, or D. melanogaster, or Tribolium castaneum, or A. mellifera) or the human genome sequence as a reference. For those fragments which their complete coding sequence could not be found by above methods, we used the complete silkworm UGT protein sequences as queries to perform TBLASTN searches against the silkworm 9× genome database and defined the sequence structure by hand.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Multiple sequence alignments were initially made using the program ClustalX version 1.81 with default gap penalties [38]. These alignments were then reconciled and further adjusted by eye to minimize insertion/deletion events. A conserved C-terminal region about 240–250 amino acids were used in the subsequent phylogenetic analyses, which includes the UGT signature motif. Phylogenetic tree were reconstructed using the neighbor-joining method [39] implemented in MEGA 4.0 program [40]. Bootstrap support was evaluated based on 1000 replicates.

Gene expression analysis with ESTs and microarray data

More than 184201 ESTs from B. mori were available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. To search transcriptional evidence for individual UGT genes, a BLASTN search was conducted against the silkworm EST database. The putative coding sequences were used as queries. A 95% or greater identity and minimum cut-off E-value (≤ e-20) were employed to discriminate between duplicated genes. Methods for microarray data analysis were mainly as described in Xia et al. (2007) [41].

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted both from the fifth-instar day 3 larvae tissues including testes, ovary, head, integument, fat body, midgut, haemocyte, malpighian tubules, silk glands, larval antenna and adult tissues including testis, wing, baenosome, abdomen, ovary, fat body, adult antenna using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). The concentration of RNA was calculated by a spectrophotometer (Gene Spec V: HITACHI, Japan). DNA within RNA samples were digested with RNase-free DNase I. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase following the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, USA).

The Primers were designed on the basis of the coding sequences of the silkworm UGTs (see Additional file 1). Silkworm cytoplasmic actin A3 gene (forward primer: 5'-AACACCCCGTCCTGCTCACTG-3'; reverse primer: 5'-GGGCGAGACGTGTGATTTCCT-3') was used as an internal control. PCR amplification was performed in a total reaction volume of 25 μl, containing normalized cDNA, 15 pmol of each primer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM dNTP, 1× buffer and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. PCRs were performed with the following cycles: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min; then followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min annealing (temperatures listed in Additional file 1), 1.5 min extension (72°C), and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplification products were analyzed on 1% agarose gels.


  1. 1.

    Tephly TR, Burchell B: UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: a family of detoxifying enzymes. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1990, 11: 276-279. 10.1016/0165-6147(90)90008-V.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brierley CH, Burchell B: Human UDP-glucuronosyl transferases: chemical defence, jaundice and gene therapy. Bioessays. 1993, 15: 749-754. 10.1002/bies.950151108.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Meyer UA: Overview of enzymes of drug metabolism. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1996, 24: 449-459. 10.1007/BF02353473.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nebert DW, Gonzalez FJ: P450 genes: structure, evolution, and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987, 56: 945-993. 10.1146/

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Guengerich FP: Catalytic selectivity of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: relevance to drug metabolism and toxicity. Toxicol Lett. 1994, 70 (2): 133-138. 10.1016/0378-4274(94)90156-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maser E, Opperman UC: Role of type-1 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in detoxification processes. Eur J Biochem. 1997, 249: 365-369. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00365.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shen H, Kauvar L, Tew KD: Importance of glutathione and associated enzymes in drug response. Oncol Res. 1997, 9: 295-302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Feyereisen R: Molecular biology of insecticide resistance. Toxicol Lett. 1995, 82: 83-90. 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03470-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Burchell B, Coughtrie MW: UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Pharmacol Ther. 1989, 43: 261-289. 10.1016/0163-7258(89)90122-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mackenzie PI, Owens IS, Burchell B, Bock KW, Bairoch A, Belanger A, Fournel-Gigleux S, Green M, Hum DW, Iyanagi T: The UDP glycosyltransferase gene superfamily: recommended nomenclature update based on evolutionary divergence. Pharmacogenetics. 1997, 7: 255-269. 10.1097/00008571-199708000-00001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meech R, Mackenzie PI: Structure and function of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997, 24: 907-915. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb02718.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lazard D, Zupko K, Poria Y, Nef P, Lazarovits J, Horn S, Khen M, Lancet D: Odorant signal termination by olfactory UDP-glucuronosyltransferase. Nature. 1991, 349: 790-793. 10.1038/349790a0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ahmad S, Forgash AJ: Nonoxidative enzymes in the metabolism of insecticides. Drug Metab Rev. 1976, 5: 141-164. 10.3109/03602537608995840.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ahmad SA, Hopkins TL: β-glucosylation of plant phenolics by phenol β-glucosyltransferase in larval tissues of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1993, 23: 581-589. 10.1016/0965-1748(93)90031-M.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rausell C, Llorca J, Real MD: Separation by FPLC chromatofocusing of UDP-glucosyltransferases from three developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1997, 34: 347-358. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6327(1997)34:3<347::AID-ARCH8>3.0.CO;2-R.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Real M, Ferre J, Chapa F: UDP-glucosyltransferase activity toward exogenous substrates in Drosophila melanogaster. Anal Biochem. 1991, 194: 349-352. 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90239-P.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bull DL, Whitten CJ: Factors influencing organophosphorus insecticide resistance in tobacco budworms. J Agric Food Chem. 1972, 20: 561-564. 10.1021/jf60181a061.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kramer K, Hopkins T: Tyrosine metabolsim for insect cuticle tanning. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1987, 6: 279-301. 10.1002/arch.940060406.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hopkins TL, Kramer KJ: Insect cuticle sclerotization. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992, 37: 273-302. 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001421.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang Q, Hasan G, Pikielny CW: Preferential expression of biotransformation enzymes in the olfactory organs of Drosophila melanogaster, the antennae. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 10309-10315. 10.1074/jbc.274.15.10309.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Teresa L, David R, Reilly O: Functional and phylogenetic analyses of a putative Drosophila melanogaster UDP-glycosyltransferase gene. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2002, 32: 1597-1604. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00080-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li Y, Baldauf S, Lim EK, Bowles DJ: Phylogenetic analysis of the UDP-glycosyltransferase multigene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 4338-4343. 10.1074/jbc.M007447200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mackenzie P: Expression of chimeric cDNAs in cell cultured a region of UDP glucuronosyltransferase involved in substrate selection. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 3432-3435.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Radominska-Pandya A, Czernik PJ, Little JM, Battaglia E, Mackenzie PI: Structural and functional studies of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Rev. 1999, 31: 817-899. 10.1081/DMR-100101944.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jackson MR, Nilsson T, Peterson PA: Identification of a consensus motif for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 1990, 9 (10): 3153-3162.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mackenzie PI, Owens IS: Differential induction and glycosylation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase. Biochem Soc Trans. 1984, 12 (1): 54-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nilsson T, Jackson M, Peterson PA: Short cytoplasmic sequences serve as retention signals for transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell. 1989, 58: 707-718. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90105-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shin J, Dunbrack RL, Lee S, Strominger JL: Signals for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum studied with CD4 truncation mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 1918-1922. 10.1073/pnas.88.5.1918.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yokota H, Yuasa A, Sato R: Topological disposition of UDP-glucuronyltransferase in rat liver microsomes. J Biochem. 1992, 112: 192-196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Luque T, Okano K, O'Reilly DR: Characterization of a novel silkworn (Bombyx mori) phenol UDP-glucosyltransferase. Eur J Biochem. 2002, 269: 819-825. 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02723.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fujimoto N: On the physiological functions of the genes concerning the formation and the translocation of the pigments of green cocoon in silkworm larvae. J Seric Sci Jpn. 1972, 32: 338-342.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yasumori T, Nakajimab K, Nagayasua K, Takabayashib C: Flavonoid 5-glucosides from the cocoon shell of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Phytochemistry. 2002, 59: 275-278. 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00477-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hopkins TL, Ahmad SA: Flavonoid wing pigments in grasshoppers. Experientia. 1991, 47: 1089-1091. 10.1007/BF01923349.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lahtinen M, Kapari L, Kentta J: Newly hatched neonate larvae can glycosylate: the fate of Betula pubescens bud flavonoids in first instar Epirrita autumnata. J Chem Ecol. 2006, 32: 537-546. 10.1007/s10886-005-9015-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Salminen JP, Lahtinen M, Lempa K, Kapari L, Haukioja E, Pihlaja K: Metabolic modifications of birch leaf phenolics by an herbivorous insect: detoxification of flavonoid aglycones via glycosylation. Z Naturforsch [C]. 2004, 59 (5-6): 437-444.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wiesen B, Krug E, Fiedler K, Wray V, Proksch P: Sequestration of host-plant-derived flavonoids by lycaenid butterfly Polyommatus icarus. J Chem Ecol. 1994, 20: 2523-2538. 10.1007/BF02036189.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chikara H, Hiroshi O, Yasumori T, Kotaro K, Masatoshi N: Regioselective formation of quercetin 5-O-glucoside from orally administered quercetin in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Phytochemistry. 2008, 69: 1141-1149. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbour-joining method: a new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Xia Q, Cheng D, Duan J, Wang G, Cheng T, Zha X, Liu C, Zhao P, Dai F, Zhang Z, He N, Zhang L, Xiang Z: Microarray-based gene expression profiles in multiple tissues of the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori. Genome Biol. 2007, 8: R162-10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r162.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the Hi-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China (2006AA10A117), National Basic Research Program of China under the grant no.2005CB121000, and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B07045). ZZ was also supported by a grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30671587). We thank Prof. Ningjia He for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng Lu.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

FFH carried out the analysis of the sequences and drafted the manuscript. CLC revised the manuscript. ZZ improved the study design and revised the manuscript. ZHL helped to perform the experiment of RT-PCR. FYD revised the manuscript. CL conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. ZHX supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, F., Chai, C., Zhang, Z. et al. The UDP-glucosyltransferase multigene family in Bombyx mori. BMC Genomics 9, 563 (2008).

Download citation


  • Malpighian Tubule
  • Silk Gland
  • Intron Position
  • Intron Loss
  • Intron Gain