Skip to main content

Macronuclear genome structure of the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis: Single-gene chromosomes and tiny introns



Nyctotherus ovalis is a single-celled eukaryote that has hydrogen-producing mitochondria and lives in the hindgut of cockroaches. Like all members of the ciliate taxon, it has two types of nuclei, a micronucleus and a macronucleus. N. ovalis generates its macronuclear chromosomes by forming polytene chromosomes that subsequently develop into macronuclear chromosomes by DNA elimination and rearrangement.


We examined the structure of these gene-sized macronuclear chromosomes in N. ovalis. We determined the telomeres, subtelomeric regions, UTRs, coding regions and introns by sequencing a large set of macronuclear DNA sequences (4,242) and cDNAs (5,484) and comparing them with each other. The telomeres consist of repeats CCC(AAAACCCC)n, similar to those in spirotrichous ciliates such as Euplotes, Sterkiella (Oxytricha) and Stylonychia. Per sequenced chromosome we found evidence for either a single protein-coding gene, a single tRNA, or the complete ribosomal RNAs cluster. Hence the chromosomes appear to encode single transcripts. In the short subtelomeric regions we identified a few overrepresented motifs that could be involved in gene regulation, but there is no consensus polyadenylation site. The introns are short (21–29 nucleotides), and a significant fraction (1/3) of the tiny introns is conserved in the distantly related ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. As has been observed in P. tetraurelia, the N. ovalis introns tend to contain in-frame stop codons or have a length that is not dividable by three. This pattern causes premature termination of mRNA translation in the event of intron retention, and potentially degradation of unspliced mRNAs by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway.


The combination of short leaders, tiny introns and single genes leads to very minimal macronuclear chromosomes. The smallest we identified contained only 150 nucleotides.


Ciliates form an extremely diverse taxonomic group of protozoa. They are the most complex single-celled eukaryotes, with some genomes containing more than 20,000 genes [1], Examples are the two completely sequenced ciliates Paramecium (39,642 genes) [2] and Tetrahymena (27,424 genes) [3]. They are abundant in almost every aqueous environment, from ocean waters to small ponds and even pockets of soil water; and they can grow as symbionts, commensals and parasites in pelagic, benthic, sapropelic or intestinal ecosystems. However, despite this diversity, ciliates have one common and unique feature: they possess two types of nuclei, each with its own specific function.

The micronucleus of ciliates represents the germ-line and contains high molecular weight DNA in the form of large chromosomes, while the macronucleus encodes proteins and RNAs required for somatic functions [4]. The macronucleus contains DNA on sub-chromosomal fragments, which in Paramecium and Tetrahymena range from 50 kb to more than 1,500 kb [1, 5]. Macronuclei are generated from the post conjugation micronuclei in a complex process that involves DNA elimination and large-scale genomic rearrangements [510]. This process and the genetic organization of the macronucleus have been intensively studied in both peritrichous and spirotrichous (formerly hypotrichous) ciliates [5, 7, 8, 11]. In peritrichous ciliates, such as Paramecium and Tetrahymena, about 20% of the micronuclear DNA is deleted during macronucleus formation, the chromosomes become fragmented and reorganized in sub-chromosomal molecules. In spirotrichous ciliates such as Stylonychia or Sterkiella (Oxytricha), the formation of macronuclei is especially complex since it can involve the loss of more than 95% of the complexity of the DNA and large-scale reordering of the protein-encoding DNA segments. Protein-encoding sequences are joined and assembled into the proper open reading frame, a process that depends on maternal guide RNAs [12]. Lastly, the open reading frames (ORFs), together with non-coding 5' – leader and 3' – trailer sequences, are released as individual, short DNA molecules. These molecules are capped with telomeres, and selectively amplified as individual "mini-chromosomes" [8, 13, 14].

In certain spirotrichous ciliates, the development of the new macronucleus involves transient formation of polytene chromosomes [6, 10]. These giant chromosomes resemble the polytene chromosomes of dipteran larvae but are transcriptionally inactive and disintegrate shortly after reaching their highest degree of polyteny [6, 10]. Genome rearrangements, DNA elimination and, lastly, reorganization of the residual DNA into "gene-sized pieces" occur during the breakdown of polytene chromosomes.

Here we examine the structure of the macronuclear DNA of Nyctotherus ovalis, a member of a third group of ciliates known as the heterotrichous ciliates. N. ovalis lives in an anaerobic intestinal environment. It is of particular interest because it possesses hydrogenosomes that contain a genome [15] and that therewith have provided evidence that these organelles evolved from a mitochondrial ancestor [16]. There are some reports [1720] that the heterotrichous ciliates Nyctotherus cordiformis and N. ovalis, which live in the intestinal tracts of frogs and cockroaches, respectively, form polytene chromosomes after conjugation, similar to Stylonychia [21]. With respect to the structure of the N. ovalis macronuclear chromosomes there is evidence from studies on individual genes, such as those for hydrogenase [10] and alpha tubulin [22] from telomere-capped sequences [16], as well as from a set of 34 complete macronuclear chromosomes [23], that N. ovalis, like Stylonychia, has gene-sized chromosomes. Alignment of the macronuclear chromosomes with known proteins furthermore has indicated the presence of short (< 30 nt) introns [15, 16, 22, 23]. We examined the structure of N. ovalis gene-sized chromosomes and the regulation of their transcription by combining information from large-scale cDNA (4,242 sequences) and cDNA libraries (5,484 sequences, including 327 complete macronuclear chromosomes). N. ovalis possesses very minimal macronuclear chromosomes, with short leaders, tiny introns and single genes. The introns tend either to contain in-frame stop codons, or their length is not dividable by three. N. ovalis thus prevents translation of unspliced mRNAs, as has been described for P. tetraurelia [24].


1.1 Chromosome structure

1.1.1 Gene-sized chromosomes

We surveyed the genomic organization of the macronucleus of N. ovalis. Agarose gel electrophoresis revealed that the majority of the undigested DNA isolated from intact N. ovalis was present in the form of low molecular weight DNA (size range 0,5–10 kb; Figure 1; [15]). Southern blotting revealed that genes were present as gene-sized DNA fragments (Fig. 1, [10]). To survey the genome organization of N. ovalis at the sequence level, we generated a macronuclear gDNA library and sequenced 4,242 representative clones, as well as 5,484 cDNAs from a polyA-plus cDNA library. It should thereby be noted that N. ovalis cannot be cultured yet. Cells have to be isolated by hand from dissected hindguts of cockroaches. Only a small number of cockroaches contain N. ovalis cells at a density of several hundred cells per hindgut, making it very difficult to obtain sufficient material for DNA/RNA isolation. Therefore, performing a total sequencing of the genome and the corresponding cDNAs will therefore be extremely difficult if not impossible. In the current study we obtained 4,755 non-redundant gDNAs and cDNAs with a limited overlap between them. Assuming a genome size similar to the published Ciliate genomes (27,000 and 40,000 genes) this corresponds to ~15% of the total genome. Randomly selected clones were sequenced in a single reaction. After filtering vector sequences and poorly-resolved terminal regions (see Materials section), we clustered the remaining sequences to remove redundancy. Grouping sequences with ≥ 97% identity over a stretch of at least 100 nucleotides resulted in our identifying 2,841 gDNA clusters (692 containing between two and 23 sequences and 2,149 single sequence clusters) and 1,914 cDNA clusters (416 containing between two and 843 sequences and 1,498 single sequence clusters). These will be referred to as the nr-set (non-redundant set). Sequences with non-determined nucleotides (N) were excluded from analyses that required correct nucleotides at all positions, like genetic code analysis (see below).

Figure 1

a) Structure of N. ovalis macronuclear chromosomes. 1a-0.4% Agarose gel: M1 = λ- DNA (48502 bp). M2 = λ Eco RI/HindIII (sizes of the DNA fragments: 21226, 5148+4973, 4268, 3530, 2027, 1904, 1584 and 1375 bp). Lane 1,2 and 3 contain total DNA of Nyctotherus ovalis. Lane 4 contains total DNA of Euplotes crassus. Arrows indicate the ribosomal clusters (see Materials). b) Length distribution of the sequenced full-length macronuclear chromosomes. c) Southern blotting: unrestricted total DNA of N. ovalis was separated on a 0.7% agarose gel, blotted and hybridized with clones containing the α2 tubulin (α tub) and the β2 tubulin gene of Stylonychia lemnae. The labeling of single, gene-sized bands indicates the presence of tubulin genes on gene-sized DNA molecules.

In the 2,841 gDNA nr-set we identified 327 sequences that were capped by telomeres at both ends, representing complete macronuclear chromosomes. In none of these could we find evidence for the presence of more than a single gene (see Materials). Moreover, we examined carefully all the incomplete gDNA sequences for multiple genes containing macronuclear chromosomes. Here too we only observed a single gene per chromosome. The vast majority of the macronuclear chromosomes were smaller than 7 kb, and the sequencing of clones with inserts less than 6–7 kb did not provide any evidence for the presence of more than one gene per chromosome. However, there were DNA bands (Figure 1a) larger than 10 kb that were neither cloned nor sequenced. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that a few chromosomes with several genes were present. Similarly to the protein-coding chromosomes, the nr-set was found to contain 12 separate chromosomes coding for single tRNA molecules. We will refer to this pattern as a "one macronuclear chromosome one-transcript rule" rather than a "one-macronuclear chromosome one-gene rule", because the complete ribosomal array (28S, 5.8S and 18S rRNA genes) is located on a single macronuclear chromosome and the complete ribosomal RNA tends to be encoded on a single transcript in ciliates [8].

We examined the macronuclear chromosome length distribution for all 327 fully-sequenced chromosomes (Figure 1b). The smallest two-telomere-capped sequence we found that encodes a known gene was a serine tRNA (AM890335), with 233 nucleotides between the two telomeres. The smallest two-telomere-containing sequence we found for which no homologs could be identified was 150 nt (accession number AM890150). This sequence is the smallest putative macronuclear chromosome ever identified (although, one should keep in mind that these molecules lack centromeres, unlike true chromosomes). The presence of this 150 nt macronuclear chromosome was confirmed by nested PCR with specific primers. It does not contain a substantial open reading frame and might therefore code for a structural RNA. However, analysis of its RNA secondary structure did not indicate a significantly lower free energy than for random sequences with the same base composition, nor did analysis with miRNA prediction programs indicate a miRNA like structure (see Materials).

1.1.2 Telomere sequences

We sequenced 13 full length macronuclear chromosomes using the same approach applied to other species [25]. Telomeres were observed with the sequence CCC(AAAACCCC) n at the 5' end, and the sequence (GGGGTTTT) m GGG (plus one of the form (GGGGTTTT) m GGGGTTT) at the 3' end, with n and m ranging from 1 to 6. There appeared to be a trend of one long and one short telomere, giving rise to a negative Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between the number of repeats in 5' and 3' telomeres (-0.83925). This contrasts with the report of Cavalcanti et al. [25], who observed no clear trend in the lengths of telomeres in Sterkiella histriomuscorum (Oxytricha trifallax). However, the libraries were generated differently and our initial data set of 13 sequences was small compared to the 1,028 clones in ref [25].

Using the motifs determined above, we identified telomeres on 2,249 of the 2,841 gDNA sequences. Of these sequences, 327 contained telomeres on both sides, suggesting that they represented complete macronuclear chromosomes. Several (larger) chromosomes carrying a single gene have been sequenced manually using suppression PCR as in [26]. Because we used telomere primers for amplification of the total gDNA for the generation of the gDNA library, we could not determine the length of the telomeres in the set of 327 exactly, as primer-shifting occurs during the PCR.

1.1.3 Subtelomeric regions

We define the chromosomal leader as the subtelomeric region that runs from the 5' telomere to the beginning of the ORF and the chromosomal trailer as the subtelomeric region that runs from the stop codon to the 3' telomere. In order to identify these regions, we first oriented 1,459 gDNAs by predicted homology to a known protein in UniProt (SWX, e-value threshold = 1.e-05). Subsequently we compared these gDNAs with the 1,914 nr-cDNAs using GeneDetective (see Materials) followed by manual checking of all cDNA/gDNA pairs. Combining these data with the putatively homologous proteins from UniProt, we could infer the position of 14 ATG start codons precisely. The size of the leaders in these 14 chromosomes ranged from 60 to 184 nucleotides, with an average of 112, while the length of the 5'UTRs ranged from 8 to 44 nucleotides. We followed the same procedure to identify the trailers and 3' UTRs: using the cDNAs with a match against the gDNAs and against a known protein we could accurately identify eight regions running from the stop codon until the polyA addition site. The 3' UTR length ranges from 13 to 68 with an average of 36 nucleotides. TAA was generally used as stop codon. The size of the chromosomal trailers ranged from 33 to 125 nucleotides.

To examine whether there were any biases in the nucleotide composition of the subtelomeric regions, we calculated the Shannon entropy, the purine skew, and GC skew for the 300 first nucleotides after the 5' telomeres and for the last 300 nucleotides before the 3' telomeres.

761 sequences were found to contain at least 300 nucleotides after the 5' telomere and to have a BlastX hit in UniProt that allowed determination of the coding strand. The Shannon entropy and the frequency of each base are plotted in Figure 2. For four different states (in our case, four nucleotides), the maximum entropy is two, corresponding to equal nucleotide frequencies. Lower entropies indicate a bias in the composition.

Figure 2

Nucleotide frequency distributions and Shannon entropy of the frequency distribution of the first 300 nt after telomeres in the 5' of the coding strand.

The results indicated a bias in the nucleotide frequencies in the first 70 bases that was found to disappear at about 130 nucleotides. The region of the bias coincided with the length of the 5' leaders (between 60 and 184 with an average of 112). To explain the low entropy, we examined different types of biases in the nucleotide composition. We observed the strongest bias in the purine/pyrimidine ratio, expressed in the so-called purine skew ((A+G)-(C+T))/((A+G)+(C+T)). This index varied from -1 (only C and/or T) to 1 (only A and/or G), with a value of 0 corresponding to no skew. More purines than pyrimidines were found in the 5' region of the coding strand (Figure 3), especially in the first ~130 nt.

Figure 3

Schematic view of N. ovalis macronuclear chromosome structure and the purine/pyrimidine ratios. Lengths of the various parts composing the chromosome and cDNA are displayed. The combination of short leaders, short introns and single genes leads to very short chromosomes. In this figure we can observe as well that the purine/pyrimidine skew is higher than 0 in the coding strand, allowing the prediction of coding strands for chromosomes without a homolog among known proteins.

There were 505 sequences containing at least 300 nucleotides before the 3' telomere, having a BlastX hit in UniProt that allowed determination of the coding strand. As with the 5' ends of the chromosomes, the Shannon entropy indicated a bias in the last ~70 nucleotides, but in contrast to the 5' leader, a low percentage of G and a general pyrimidine skew. In other words, symmetry was found in the purine skew. Whether one starts from the 5' end of the coding strand, or from the 5' end of the non-coding strand, there is a strong purine skew near the telomere. The pyrimidine skew at the 3' end of the chromosomes did not, however, extend into the coding region, which showed a general purine skew (Figure 3). This allowed us to predict which strand was coding in chromosomes without detectable homology to a known protein (see below). The purine skew in the subtelomeric regions has also been described for the ciliate Sterkiella [25]. The skew represents a violation of parity rule two, which states that complementary DNA strands tend to have the same purine/pyrimidine composition [2729].

1.1.4 Intron structure

To detect introns, we first performed a comparison between the cDNA and gDNA clustered sets using GeneDetective (Materials). After removing paralogs and refining the intron boundaries by hand, we identified a total of 48 introns in 27 gDNAs. This intron set will be referred to as the experimentally-derived introns. All introns were very short, ranging from 21 to 29 nucleotides with an average of 24 nt and a median of 23 nt (Figure 4a). Intron prediction based on the comparison with P. tetraurelia proteins (see below) gave an identical median of 23 nt but a larger average of 26 nt, due to a tail of a few relatively long introns (Figure 4a). This is similar to the average intron length of 27 nt (ranging from 21 – 66) reported by McGrath et al.[23], which was based on comparison of gDNAs with known proteins. Comparison of the average intron length (27) with the intron length range (21–66) in the analysis of McGrath et al., indicates their intron length distribution also has a long tail. The existence of these "long" introns (> 30 nt) is weakly supported, as we do not observe them in our more direct gDNA/cDNA based comparisons. Furthermore, by doing BlastX comparisons with a larger database (UniProt) we could correct 8 of the 15 long (11 introns ≥ 30 nt) and very short introns (4 introns ≤ 18 nt) that were predicted by the comparison with P. tetraurelia to fall within the boundaries that were identified for the experimental introns (21 to 30 nt). This underscores that intron prediction by comparison against a protein database depends critically on the proteins in that database.

Figure 4

a) Distribution of the intron length (in percentage) within the two sets of introns: The experimental set (48 introns) that was obtained by comparing N. ovalis cDNAs with gDNAs and the predicted set (145 introns) that was obtained by comparison of N. ovalis gDNAs with P. tetraurelia proteins. The predicted set contains three longer introns that are not shown in this histogram (76, 114 and 252 nt long). b) Schematic representation of the exon/intron boundaries with WebLogo in 48 introns. The GTA and TAG motifs are well conserved. c) Conservation of intron location between N. ovalis and P. tetraurelia in two genes that are orthologous to Succinyl-CoA ligase. Introns were considered conserved when they were within 2 amino acids of each other in the protein alignment. Intron I of N. ovalis and II of P. tetraurelia are conserved. Intron II of N. ovalis and I of P. tetraurelia are not conserved. Whether Intron III of P. tetraurelia is conserved or not cannot be determined.

The boundaries of the experimentally derived introns are very similar to each other: exon|GTA......TAG|exon; where "|" is the border between exon and intron (Figure 4b), with only two exceptions for which the last three intron nucleotides are CAG and TGG. Examination of the introns with AlignACE [30], a program that finds conserved motifs, did not identify a branch point or any other overrepresented motifs other than the intron boundaries. The introns contain a high percentage of thymidine (35%) in the introns versus 23% in the coding sequence. Guanine (17% vs. 24%) and cytidine (17% vs. 21%) are low, while adenine (31% vs. 32%) is more or less the same in the coding regions and the introns. This is different from what we observe for other non-coding sequences such as the leaders, where the thymidine content was lower than in the coding sequence. The introns in protein-coding sequences appear to be of the type that is excised by the spliceosome. Supporting the presence of a standard mRNA splicing machinery, we identified seven homologs of members of the spliceosome complex: Splicing factor 3B subunit 1, Splicing factor 3A subunit 3, splicing factor YT521, Splicing factor 1, splicing factor SLU7, Spliceosomal U5 snRNP-specific 15 kDa protein and Splicing factor U2AF 35 kDa subunit.

1.1.5 Intron conservation

To examine the evolutionary conservation of the intron positions, we compared the 48 introns of the 27 N. ovalis gDNA sequences (above) with those of their closest homologs in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. The latter also has tiny introns (comprising between 20 and 33 nucleotides [31]) for which a large number have been experimentally determined (Materials). Of the ten introns in N. ovalis sequences with significant best hits in P. tetraurelia, in which the aligned regions "covered" the N. ovalis introns, four occur at the same position in P. tetraurelia. A typical example is the succinyl CoA ligase gene that contains two introns in N. ovalis. One of these is conserved in P. tetraurelia, which itself has two introns in the region that can be confidently aligned between the two species (Figure 4c). To our knowledge this is the first observation of the conservation of these tiny introns. In order to quantify the level of intron conservation, we performed a second analysis in which we compared the N. ovalis gDNAs in which intron locations were predicted using Genewise [32] (Materials) with proteins with experimentally determined (gDNA/cDNA) intron locations in Paramecium tetraurelia (these were kindly provided by Laurent Duret [33]). Here we observed conservation of the intron position for 48 introns between P. tetraurelia and N. ovalis, out of 145 introns that Genewise predicted in N. ovalis based on comparisons of the N. ovalis gDNAs with the P. tetraurelia proteins. The fraction of conservation of tiny introns between these ciliates therefore appears to be about 1/3.

Jaillon et al. [24] have reported that introns which lack in-frame stop codons tend not to occur in lengths dividable by three. This guarantees that unspliced mRNAs will be recognized by the NMD by having premature stop codons, either in the intron itself or caused by the frame shift resulting from the retained intron. Such a trend is also visible in the N. ovalis predicted introns. Out of the 145 introns, 40 do not have an in-frame stop codon (TAA, TAG or TGA, see below). Out of these 40 only 3 have a length that is dividable by three. In contrast, of the 105 introns that do have an in-frame stop codon, 60 have a length dividable by three. There is thus, among the introns without in-frame stop codons, a significant under-representation of introns dividable by three compared to introns that do contain stop codons (P = 1E-7, based on the chi squared test).

The conservation of tiny introns between the very distantly-related P. tetraurelia and N. ovalis indicates that some introns can be traced back to early ciliate evolution. We also examined conservation of intron positions with Tetrahymena thermophila, which does not contain tiny introns (containing between 53 and 978 nt, see Figure 6). In the sequence alignments, the positions of three T. thermophila introns lay within 2 amino acids of introns in N. ovalis [see Additional file 1]. This would argue for independent evolution of intron position and intron length. Alternatively, in ciliates with tiny introns it is possible that intron length is strongly reduced during the development of the macronucleus. In any case, the total number of conserved introns for which there is experimental evidence in at least one species is small, and precludes definitive statements regarding their independent evolution from genome structure. We could not detect any conservation of intron positions in the more distantly-related alveolate Plasmodium falciparum. We searched for gDNAs resulting from bacterial to ciliate or archaeal to ciliate Horizontal Gene Transfer events using a similar method as we used for rumen ciliates [34]. In this set we found no evidence of introns.

With a length between 21 and 29 nucleotides and an average of ~24 nucleotides, the introns in the N. ovalis set described in this report are among the smallest spliceosomal introns known. The shortest spliceosomal introns, 18 nucleotides, have been described in the nucleomorph of a chlorarachniophyte algae [35]. Several short introns have been described in ciliates in the literature. For example, the introns in P. tetraurelia are between 20 and 33 nt [31], and the introns in Sterkiella histriomuscorum are between 31 and 137 nt in length [36]. In Euplotes octocarinatus, introns were detected in a range of 30 to 145 nt [37, 38]. Four short introns, ranging from 37 to 47 nt, were also described in gamma tubulin encoding genes of Euplotes crassus [39].

1.2 Transcriptional properties

1.2.1 Orientation of the sequences

The macronuclear chromosomes we sequenced contain just one gene. Being able to determine the coding strand of these sequences would be a first step in annotating those sequences without hits against known proteins. We used the observation that the coding strand has a positive purine/pyrimidine ratio (Figure 3) to orient the sequences that lack hits to known proteins. Two other methods that we applied were: 1) finding the best ORF using getORF from EMBOSS and 2) calculating the GC gradient [40] on the set of 1,459 sequences having a match against a known protein from UniProt (UniProt set), as a benchmark. The purine/pyrimidine ratio was the best indicator of the coding strand with a good prediction in 97% of the cases, compared to 80% for the ORF prediction and ~50% for the GC gradient. Using the purine/pyrimidine ratio allowed us to orient all 1,382 sequences that did not belong to the UniProt-set with 97% confidence.

1.2.2 Motif discovery

In all ciliate species with gene-sized macronuclear chromosomes which have been studied, approximately 95% of germ-line DNA is eliminated during the development of the macronucleus [41]. The incredibly short leader and trailer that remain must therefore contain a high density of signals for processes like telomere addition, replication, copy regulation and transcription. Thus, ciliates provide a uniquely compact model to study these basic eukaryotic regulatory systems. Because we identified homologs of a number of transcription factors (E2F5 family transcription factor, transcription factor Dp-2, MADS box transcription factor, C-MYB-like transcription factor and transcription factor E2F/dimerisation partner (TDP)) in our data set, we can also expect their regulatory elements to be present in the N. ovalis macronuclear genome. We searched our nr-set of N. ovalis sequences for novel motifs and known Transcription Factor Binding Sites (TFBS).

As genes with related functions are often co-regulated, they may be expected to contain comparable signals in their non-coding DNA [30, 42]. Therefore, to search for meaningful motifs, we first composed groups of related genes based on a number of different criteria. Genes were clustered based on membership of an orthologous group (OG, see Materials) to detect signals shared by paralogous genes, or on the membership of a common pathway. For the latter we used both the KEGG pathways and EcoCyc pathways. In addition we composed a set of 12 non-redundant tRNAs identified with tRNAscan-SE [43]. For each group of sequences (except for tRNAs, see below), we searched the first 200 nucleotides after the 5'-telomere using AlignACE [30] and MEME [44]. Note that 200 nt should be enough to cover the complete upstream non-coding DNA, even in the sequences where no translation start site could be identified (Figure 3).

Using this approach, we could identify several potential regulatory motifs. First, MEME identified a motif with the consensus sequence AATTAACATGAGTC in the upstream regions of 12 Chaperonin GroEL genes of the HSP60 family (COG0459; the data set contained the alpha, beta, eta, theta, gamma and epsilon subunits and HSP60). Searching this motif with MAST, we found that it also occurs upstream of a protein from the superfamily DNA and RNA helicase, with the motif profile fitting the helicase sequence with an e-value of 3.6e-06. HSP60 and helicase could be regulated concomitantly as they can both be regulated by DNA-dependent protein kinase [45, 46]. Another study also reported that dysregulated expression of an RNA helicase leads to an altered distribution of HSP60 [47].

Second, we identified conserved motifs in the tRNA chromosomes, by searching the entire set of gene-sized tRNA chromosomes (Figure 5). Two of the motifs we identified have very well-conserved positions: a likely TATA box (~35 nt upstream of the tRNA), and a motif with consensus GCAATTTTTATTCC (~2 nt downstream). This last motif corresponds to the termination signal of RNA polymerase III transcription [48, 49]. Searching for these motifs in the whole nr-set using MAST [50] identified no other sequences that contained these motifs, which is not surprising, as the protein coding genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. The TATA box could be identified in some sequences that we checked manually.

Figure 5

Schematic view of the structure of tRNA macronuclear chromosomes. The motifs found with MEME in more than half of the 12 nr-tRNAs are displayed as a WebLogo picture, together with their positions ( (~average)). 0 corresponds to start of the tRNA.

In an additional search for known TFBS, we used MAST [50] to search for the 398 Transfac MATRIX 7.0 motifs [51]. These results did not link sets of functionally related sequences (e.g. shared KEGG pathway or COG functional category, not shown).

Considering the few motifs identified in these analyses, it should also be noted that the Transfac profiles we searched for are specific for several eukaryotic species but not for ciliates. Furthermore, previous studies of spirotrichous ciliates have identified few conserved motifs, leading to the suggestion that telomeres may also play a role in regulating gene expression/DNA replication [52].

In the trailer region we searched for the consensus eukaryotic polyadenylation signal AATAAA [53, 54]. This motif was not found in our sequences, confirming a previous study on a smaller dataset [55]. Examining by hand the eight pieces of trailer sequences identified with the help of cDNAs and known homologs [see Additional file 2] revealed no degenerate motif either. McGrath and co-workers [23] have reported an over-represented long motif in the 5' and 3' ends in their set of 34 complete chromosomes, and a shorter subsequence of that motif in the 5' and 3' ends of all the chromosomes. Neither the consensus sequence of the long motif, nor its shorter subsequence was present in our dataset, nor could we detect significant similarity to the consensus sequences in our gDNAs.

1.2.3 Genetic code

In a set of 328 cDNAs that could confidently be aligned with the C-terminus of known proteins, TAA was most often the first codon after the C-terminus of the protein alignment (141 cases), and therewith obviously the stop codon. Consistent with earlier findings that were based on smaller sets of sequences [23, 55] we conclude that N. ovalis preferentially uses UAA as a stop codon. UAG was rarely observed in the stop codon position (in 5 out of 328 cDNAs) and UGA was never observed in the stop codon position. When reexamining the published sequences from McGrath et al.[23] and Destables et al.[55] we noticed that when using this strict criterion of requiring an alignment until the end of the C-terminus of a known protein and only considering as potential stop codon the first codon 3' of the protein alignment, also in these sets TAA was the only stop codon that could confidently be assigned. Nevertheless, UGA and UAG are, like UAA, avoided in cDNAs that could be aligned with known proteins or protein domains. Ciliates have a wide variety of genetic codes [56, 57]. For example, several deeply-diverging lineages, including the genera Tetrahymena and Paramecium, Stylonychia and Sterkiella, and Diophrys [58] may have independently reassigned UAA and UAG to glutamine, using UGA as their only stop codon [59]. On the other hand, Euplotes translates UGA into cysteine and uses UAA and UAG as stop codons[60], while UGA encodes tryptophan in the independent lineages including Blepharisma and Colpoda [61]. Nyctotherus thus seems most similar to Euplotes, using predominantly UAA, and sometimes UAG as a stop codon. The absence of strong positive evidence for the usage of UAG and UGA is consistent with a previous claim [57] that Nyctotherus might represent an evolutionary intermediate between the full standard genetic code and a variant code. We could, however, find no evidence for the usage of UGA or UAG as a sense codon, and combined with earlier findings of the usage of UAA and UGA as stop codon [23] this argues for a standard genetic code in N. ovalis.

Discussion and conclusions

Evolution of macronuclear gene structure

To analyze the evolution of ciliate macronuclear genome structure we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the 18S RNA from the small ribosomal subunit from various ciliates (Figure 6). The Clevelandelids (Nyctotherus) form a monophyletic group with the Armophorea (Metopus, Caenomorphidae gen. sp.) and are a sister group of the Spirotrichea that contains Sterkiella (Oxytricha), Stylonychia and Euplotes. Despite their differences in ecology (respectively anaerobic and aerobic), these two sister groups share many features, as already mentioned [3, 6, 8, 15, 16, 21, 25, 31, 52, 6267]. Another class of ciliates, namely the Phyllopharyngea, also possess gene-sized macronuclear chromosomes, but they are not monophyletic with the Spirotrich/Clevelandelids/Armophorids [22]. 'Invention' of gene-sized-macronuclear chromosomes has therefore either preceded their taxonomic separation or more likely arisen several times in evolution. Rumen ciliates that are included in the cluster of 'fragmented' macronuclear chromosomes have much larger (40–80 kb) macronuclear chromosomes with many genes per chromosome (Hackstein, unpublished data). They may represent an intermediate between the 'Tetrahymena/Paramecium" type of long macronuclear chromosomes and gene-sized-chromosomes. The presence of tiny introns does not correlate with the presence of mini-chromosomes. Rather, the exact conservation of the location of a substantial number of the tiny introns between N. ovalis and P. tetraurelia argues for independent evolution of the length of macronuclear chromosomes and intron size. We currently have scarce information about the germ-line micronuclear genome of N. ovalis. However, all the items discussed above reveal a striking similarity with the macronuclear genome organization of the spirotrichous ciliates [8, 13, 59, 65]. Codon usage suggests that Nyctotherus may be more closely related to Euplotes than to the Oxytrichids; however there is no evidence that it has a non-standard genetic code.

Figure 6

Phylogenetic tree of 18S RNA from the small ribosomal subunit of the most-studied ciliates with respect to their macronuclear structure. The tree was generated with PhyML with 100 bootstraps. The dinoflagellate Symbiodinium is used as an outgroup to root the tree. N. ovalis has a comparable macronuclear structure to Spirotrichea, its sister group in the tree (the lineage containing Euplotes through Sterkiella). MAC stands for macronucleus, MIC for micronucleus.



The α2-tubulin clone [68] and the β2-tubulin clone [69] from Stylonychia lemnae were labeled with α-[32P]-dATP by PCR with M13-forward and -reverse primers.

Genomic DNA from Nyctotherus was separated on a 0.7% (w/v) native agarose gel and blotted onto a Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham) by downward alkaline southern blotting. The filter was pre-hybridized for 1 h at 65°C in hybridization solution (6× SSC, 5× Denhardts solution, and 0.5% SDS (w/v)). After pre-hybridization, the hybridization solution was refreshed and the 32P-labeled probe was added. The filter was hybridized at 65°C for 16–19 h. The hybridized filter was washed twice in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS (w/v) and twice in 0.5% SSC, 0.1% SDS (w/v) at 65°C. Depending on the signal on the filter an extra washing step with 0.2% SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C was included. Autoradiograms were exposed for 0.5–4 h at -70°C with intensifying screens.

Construction of libraries and sequencing

gDNA of Nyctotherus ovalis was prepared by dissolving living Nyctotherus ovalis cells, purified by electromigration [70], in 8 M guanidiniumchloride. After extraction with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) a portion was analyzed on a 1% agarose gel and 5 fractions of different "size" were isolated. Every fraction was amplified by PCR with telomere primers (5'-CCAAAACCCCAAAACCCCAA-3'). Fractions with fragments < 2 kb with taq polymerase from Sigma (elongation time 2'30"), fractions > 2 kb with the "expand long template PCR system" from Roche (elongation time 4'00").

The PCR products were purified on Sephacryl-500 (Amersham), extracted with phenol/chloroform and precipitated. These fragments were ligated in PGEM T-easy (Promega) and transformed in competent E. coli Electromax DH10B cells. The 1–2 kb and 2–4 kb fractions contained sufficient clones (10,000) and were used for sequencing.

For the reconstruction of the ribosomal RNA cluster, the band (indicated by an arrow in lanes 1, 2 and 3 of Figure 1a) was cut out of gel and the DNA from this band was isolated with a gel extraction kit (QIAEX II DNA Gel Extraction Kit, Qiagen). A part of this DNA was digested with EcoR1 and cloned in a pUC-18 cloning vector. The obtained clones were sequenced and the largest part of the ribosomal cluster was reconstructed. With a set of specific telomere primers in combination with internal primers the complete ribosomal cluster was obtained.

The cDNA library was prepared from polyA-plus RNA of Nyctotherus ovalis with the "cDNA library Construction" kit from BD Biosciences/Clontech according prescription. The cDNA was ligated in the vector pDNR-LIB and transformed in E. coli Electromax DH10B cells (Invitrogen). Titer: 2.58.107. Randomly picked clones were selected for sequencing.

5,484 ESTs (Expressed Sequence Tags) and 4,242 gDNAs of N. ovalis were sequenced. Vectors and linkers were automatically filtered out of sequences. First the vector pieces were detected using a BlastN search against their respective vector sequences on TimeLogic Decypher machine using the same parameters as VecScreen (-q -5 -G 3 -E 3 -e 700 -Y 1.75e12 -F mD).

Regions showing similarity to the vector were trimmed from the ends of the sequences. If there was a remaining vector in the middle, it was removed and the longer of the two remaining fragments was kept.

Data storage and clustering

The sequences and the results of the analyses performed were stored in a relational MySQL database. In order to minimize the redundancy of the data, we aligned the dataset to itself using SWN (Smith-Waterman comparison at the nucleotide level). Sequence pairs having an identity ≥ 97% and an overlap of at least 100 nt were considered to be from the same gene and were put in the same cluster. Sequences having less or no sequence similarity can be in the same cluster as long as they are linked via other sequences. gDNAs telomeres were trimmed prior to the SWN comparison. However, information about these telomeres was kept associated to the sequence name in the database.

All sequence comparisons were run on a Decypher TimeLogic using the Smith-Waterman algorithm for pairwise sequence comparisons and Hidden Markov Models for sequence-to-profile comparisons, active motifs included. The output was subsequently analyzed in a Linux environment using Perl scripts.


We started with 9,726 sequences (5,484 cDNAs and 4,242 gDNAs). From these we used specific subsets that were more particularly designed to answer each specific biological question i.e., the best compromise between using as much data as possible and using good quality data.

We used the following datasets:

  • Initial-set: contains the clones that were initially sequenced: 4,242 gDNAs and 5,484 cDNAs.

  • Nr-set: contains the longest sequence of each cluster generated from the Initial-set: 2,841 gDNAs and 1,914 cDNAs.

  • UniProt-set: contains all Nyctotherus gDNAs having homologs with the known proteins from UniProt: 1,459 gDNAs

  • UniProt-nr-set: contains Nyctotherus gDNAs from the nr-set having homologs within the known proteins from UniProt: 937 gDNAs.

  • Princeton-set: contains 13 carefully sequenced full-length Nyctotherus macronuclear chromosomes.

All sequences have been submitted to the EMBL nucleotide database. The numbers are: AM894321–AM899804 for the cDNAs, AM890408–AM894321 for the gDNAs and AM890081–AM890407 for the set of completely sequenced macronuclear chromosomes.

Telomere removal

From the Princeton-set (see above), we could determine that macronuclear telomeres of N. ovalis are mostly of the form CCC(AAAACCCC)n or (GGGGTTTT)mGGG with n and m comprised between 1 and 6. However this set only contains 13 molecules and we found longer telomeres within the Initial-set. Despite the occasional presence of more repeats in this set, the form of these telomeres remains the same, so we identified telomeres by the following regular expression in Perl:/^GTN([CAN]CCCC)/and eventually refined their removal by hand.

Verifying that macronuclear chromosomes contain a single gene

To determine whether or not the N. ovalis sequences contain only one gene, we compared the 2,841 gDNA from the nr-set against UniProt release 9.1 database, with a SWX search and an e-value threshold of 1e-05. For all N. ovalis gDNAs, we retrieved the boundaries of the "best hit" to a known protein. Subsequently we examined whether, in the hit list there were any hits that did not overlap with the first hit. We never observed cases of such non-overlapping hits, arguing for the presence of only a single gene per macronuclear chromosome.

Orientation of the sequences

UniProt detection

Sequences were compared against UniProt database (SWX; e-value threshold = 1e-05). Sequences with a match on the reverse strand were reversed and in the case of the presence of one or the two telomeres, the upstream and/or downstream regions were extracted. 1,459 gDNAs could be oriented this way representing 937 different clusters/non-redundant sequences.

Purine/pyrimidine ratio

As we discovered that the coding strand had a higher purine/pyrimidine ratio than the reverse strand, we used this ratio to orient the sequences that could not be oriented with UniProt hit. Sequences having a purine/pyrimidine ratio < 1 were reversed.

Analysis of subtelomeric regions

The 300 first nucleotides after the telomeres 5' and the 300 nt before the telomeres 3' from the sequences of the UniProt-set were extracted. We measured the Shannon entropy (H = i = 1 n p ( i ) log 2 ( 1 p ( i ) ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaWaaabCaeaacqWGWbaCcqGGOaakcqWGPbqAcqGGPaqkcyGGSbaBcqGGVbWBcqGGNbWzdaWgaaWcbaGaeGOmaidabeaakiabcIcaOKqbaoaalaaabaGaeGymaedabaGaemiCaaNaeiikaGIaemyAaKMaeiykaKcaaOGaeiykaKcaleaacqWGPbqAcqGH9aqpcqaIXaqmaeaacqWGUbGBa0GaeyyeIuoaaaa@4449@ ), the purine skew, defined as ((A+G)-(C+T))/((A+G)+(C+T)), the AT skew, defined as ((A+T)-(G+C))/((A+T)+(G+C)), and the single nucleotide composition of these sequences for the 300 aligned positions.

We searched for conserved motifs using a Gibbs sampling program AlignACE [30], and the motif discovery tool MEME [44] in these regions.

Intron detection

1,914 cDNAs were compared to 2,841 gDNAs of the nr-set using GeneDetective with the default values except "filter off" on Decypher and Exonerate [71], with the following parameters: model = est2genome, percent = 50 and mini-intron = 20 and were then validated by hand. Exonerate only identified introns in 17 sequences, whereas GeneDetective found an additional 10 sequences with introns. To compare nucleotide percentages in the introns with the rest of the sequences, we used for the latter the pieces of cDNAs matching the gDNAs. Intron boundaries were displayed using WebLogo [72]. Introns in Nyctotherus gDNAs were predicted with Genewise [32]. First, all Nyctotherus gDNAs were compared with Paramecium proteins for which experimentally-derived (gDNA/cDNA comparison based) introns were known, using SWX (Smith-Waterman X) on a Decypher machine. Subsequently GeneWise was run for the best hits of Nyctotherus sequences with the Paramecium proteins in the "-splice flat-intron tied" mode to identify likely introns in the Nyctotherus sequences. From the GeneWise results we extracted the locations of the Nyctotherus introns in the Paramecium proteins. The latter were then compared with the experimental locations of the Paramecium introns to establish which ones were conserved. Introns were considered conserved when the Nyctotherus introns mapped to the same location in the aligned Paramecium proteins as the Paramecium introns, allowing for a maximum shift of 2 amino acids. Supporting the conservation of the 48 thus determined introns was the observation that they had a conserved phase in all cases except one. Experimentally-determined intron locations in Paramecium were kindly provided by Laurent Duret and Jean-François Goût (University de Lyon).

We compared the positions of the introns of N. ovalis against the position of the introns in their closest homologs (BlastX e-value threshold = 1.e-05) in another ciliate T. thermophila and a member of the Apicomplexa P. falciparum. Ciliates and Apicomplexa are both Alveolata. The genome of T. thermophila was recently published [3]. Tetrahymena protein and genomic sequences were obtained from the Tetrahymena Genome Database on We worked with Assembly2 – Nov_2003_scaffolds and 27,769 cDNAs from 08-30-2006. By comparing the N. ovalis sequences to known proteins (Smith-Waterman against UniProt-Swissprot database; e-value threshold = 1e10-5), we identified homologs of the spliceosome complex.

Motif, miRNA discovery

We used MEME [44], an expectation maximization algorithm and AlignACE [30], a Gibbs sampling program, to discover over-represented motifs de novo. We then tested their presence in the whole dataset using MAST [50].

We also used TRANSFAC [51], a database on eukaryotic cis-acting regulatory DNA elements and trans-acting factors that covers the whole range from yeast to human, to search these motifs in our set.

We detected tRNAs using tRNAscan-SE [43] with the default parameters. The potential presence of a miRNA was examined with the algorithm described in [73]

Genetic Code

We determined the stop codon usage by examining those cDNAs that aligned with 1) at least 40% identity over 2) at least 60 amino acids that 3) did not have unknown nucleotides (N) in the alignment and 4) aligned until the N-terminus of a known protein. For the 328 cDNAs that fit those criteria we examined the next codon. TAA (141 cases) is preferentially used as stop codon, TAG (5 cases) also occurs in those locations, but less than e.g. GAC (40 cases) or GCC (59) cases.

Phylogenetic analysis

rRNA sequences were extracted from Genbank; the sequence of the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium was used as an outgroup to root the tree.

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using an alignment provided by Muscle [74, 75]. Sequences were edited and the most relevant parts from the alignments were selected manually using Seaview [76]. Phylogenies were subsequently derived using the program PhyML [77] using the HKY model and an estimated number of invariable sites with four substitution rate categories. 100 bootstraps were performed.



transfer RiboNucleic Acid


Transcription Factor Binding Site








  1. 1.

    Zagulski M, Nowak JK, Le Mouel A, Nowacki M, Migdalski A, Gromadka R, Noel B, Blanc I, Dessen P, Wincker P, Keller AM, Cohen J, Meyer E, Sperling L: High coding density on the largest Paramecium tetraurelia somatic chromosome. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 1397-1404.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, Porcel BM, Segurens B, Daubin V, Anthouard V, Aiach N, Arnaiz O, Billaut A, Beisson J, Blanc I, Bouhouche K, Camara F, Duharcourt S, Guigo R, Gogendeau D, Katinka M, Keller AM, Kissmehl R, Klotz C, Koll F, Le Mouel A, Lepere G, Malinsky S, Nowacki M, Nowak JK, Plattner H, Poulain J, Ruiz F, Serrano V, Zagulski M, Dessen P, Betermier M, Weissenbach J, Scarpelli C, Schachter V, Sperling L, Meyer E, Cohen J, Wincker P: Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature. 2006, 444: 171-178.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Eisen JA, Coyne RS, Wu M, Wu D, Thiagarajan M, Wortman JR, Badger JH, Ren Q, Amedeo P, Jones KM, Tallon LJ, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Silva JC, Haas BJ, Majoros WH, Farzad M, Carlton JM, Smith RK, Garg J, Pearlman RE, Karrer KM, Sun L, Manning G, Elde NC, Turkewitz AP, Asai DJ, Wilkes DE, Wang Y, Cai H, Collins K, Stewart BA, Lee SR, Wilamowska K, Weinberg Z, Ruzzo WL, Wloga D, Gaertig J, Frankel J, Tsao CC, Gorovsky MA, Keeling PJ, Waller RF, Patron NJ, Cherry JM, Stover NA, Krieger CJ, Del Toro C, Ryder HF, Williamson SC, Barbeau RA, Hamilton EP, Orias E: Macronuclear Genome Sequence of the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a Model Eukaryote. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (9): e286-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prescott DM: Genome gymnastics: unique modes of DNA evolution and processing in ciliates. Nat Rev Genet. 2000, 1: 191-198.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yao MC: Programmed DNA deletions in Tetrahymena: mechanisms and implications. Trends Genet. 1996, 12: 26-30.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ammermann D: Giant chromosomes in ciliates. Results Probl Cell Differ. 1987, 14: 59-67.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Prescott DM: The unusual organization and processing of genomic DNA in hypotrichous ciliates. Trends Genet. 1992, 8: 439-445.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Prescott DM: The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev. 1994, 58: 233-267.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prescott DM: Origin, evolution, and excision of internal elimination segments in germline genes of ciliates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997, 7: 807-813.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Steinbruck G: Molecular reorganization during nuclear differentiation in ciliates. Results Probl Cell Differ. 1986, 13: 105-174.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hoffman DC, Prescott DM: Phylogenetic relationships among hypotrichous ciliates determined with the macronuclear gene encoding the large, catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase alpha. J Mol Evol. 1997, 45: 301-310.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nowacki M, Vijayan V, Zhou Y, Schotanus K, Doak TG, Landweber LF: RNA-mediated epigenetic programming of a genome-rearrangement pathway. Nature. 2008, 451: 153-158.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Landweber LF, Kuo TC, Curtis EA: Evolution and assembly of an extremely scrambled gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 3298-3303.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Prescott DM: Evolution of DNA organization in hypotrichous ciliates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999, 870: 301-313.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Akhmanova A, Voncken F, van Alen T, van Hoek A, Boxma B, Vogels G, Veenhuis M, Hackstein JH: A hydrogenosome with a genome. Nature. 1998, 396: 527-528.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boxma B, de Graaf RM, Staay van der GW, van Alen TA, Ricard G, Gabaldon T, van Hoek AH, Moon-van der Staay SY, Koopman WJ, van Hellemond JJ, Tielens AG, Friedrich T, Veenhuis M, Huynen MA, Hackstein JH: An anaerobic mitochondrion that produces hydrogen. Nature. 2005, 434: 74-79.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Golikova MN: Der Aufbau des Kernapparates und die Verteilung der Nukleinsäuren und Proteine bei Nyctotherus cordiformis stein. Arch Protistenkd. 1965, 191-216.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Grassé PP: Embranchement des Protozoaires. 1952, Paris: Masson et Cie, I:

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McKean G: A study of the ciliated protozoon Nyctotherus ovalis. Morphology: general and ultrastructural, life cycle: anisogamonty and division. 1972, Michigan: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wichterman R: Division and conjugation in Nyctotherus cordiformis (Ehr.) Stein (Protozoa, Ciliata) with special reference to the nuclear phenomena. J Morphol. 1937, 563-611.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Skovorodkin IN, Zassoukhina IB, Hojak S, Ammermann D, Gunzl A: Minichromosomal DNA replication in the macronucleus of the hypotrichous ciliate Stylonychia lemnae is independent of chromosome-internal sequences. Chromosoma. 2001, 110: 352-359.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Riley JL, Katz LA: Widespread Distribution of Extensive Chromosomal Fragmentation in Ciliates. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 1372-1377.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McGrath CL, Zufall RA, Katz LA: Variation in macronuclear genome content of three ciliates with extensive chromosomal fragmentation: a preliminary analysis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2007, 54: 242-246.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jaillon O, Bouhouche K, Gout JF, Aury JM, Noel B, Saudemont B, Nowacki M, Serrano V, Porcel BM, Segurens B, Le Mouel A, Lepere G, Schachter V, Betermier M, Cohen J, Wincker P, Sperling L, Duret L, Meyer E: Translational control of intron splicing in eukaryotes. Nature. 2008, 451: 359-362.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cavalcanti AR, Dunn DM, Weiss R, Herrick G, Landweber LF, Doak TG: Sequence features of Oxytricha trifallax (class Spirotrichea) macronuclear telomeric and subtelomeric sequences. Protist. 2004, 155: 311-322.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chang WJ, Stover NA, Addis VM, Landweber LF: A micronuclear locus containing three protein-coding genes remains linked during macronuclear development in the spirotrichous ciliate Holosticha. Protist. 2004, 155: 245-255.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Baisnee PF, Hampson S, Baldi P: Why are complementary DNA strands symmetric?. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: 1021-1033.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bell SJ, Forsdyke DR: Deviations from Chargaff's second parity rule correlate with direction of transcription. J Theor Biol. 1999, 197: 63-76.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fickett JW, Torney DC, Wolf DR: Base compositional structure of genomes. Genomics. 1992, 13: 1056-1064.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Roth FP, Hughes JD, Estep PW, Church GM: Finding DNA regulatory motifs within unaligned noncoding sequences clustered by whole-genome mRNA quantitation. Nat Biotechnol. 1998, 16: 939-945.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Russell CB, Fraga D, Hinrichsen RD: Extremely short 20–33 nucleotide introns are the standard length in Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 1221-1225.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R: GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 988-995.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Duret L, Cohen J, Jubin C, Dessen P, Gout JF, Mousset S, Aury JM, Jaillon O, Noel B, Arnaiz O, Betermier M, Wincker P, Meyer E, Sperling L: Analysis of sequence variability in the macronuclear DNA of Paramecium tetraurelia: a somatic view of the germline. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 585-596.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ricard G, McEwan NR, Dutilh BE, Jouany JP, Macheboeuf D, Mitsumori M, McIntosh FM, Michalowski T, Nagamine T, Nelson N, Newbold CJ, Nsabimana E, Takenaka A, Thomas NA, Ushida K, Hackstein JH, Huynen MA: Horizontal gene transfer from Bacteria to rumen Ciliates indicates adaptation to their anaerobic, carbohydrates-rich environment. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 22-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gilson PR, McFadden GI: The miniaturized nuclear genome of eukaryotic endosymbiont contains genes that overlap, genes that are cotranscribed, and the smallest known spliceosomal introns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 7737-7742.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cavalcanti AR, Stover NA, Orecchia L, Doak TG, Landweber LF: Coding properties of Oxytricha trifallax (Sterkiella histriomuscorum) macronuclear chromosomes: analysis of a pilot genome project. Chromosoma. 2004, 113: 69-76.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Brunen-Nieweler C, Schmidt HJ, Heckmann K: Two introns in the pheromone 3-encoding gene of Euplotes octocarinatus. Gene. 1991, 109: 233-237.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Meyer F, Schmidt HJ, Heckmann K: Pheromone 4 gene of Euplotes octocarinatus. Dev Genet. 1992, 13: 16-25.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tan M, Heckmann K: The two gamma-tubulin-encoding genes of the ciliate Euplotes crassus differ in their sequences, codon usage, transcription initiation sites and poly(A) addition sites. Gene. 1998, 210: 53-60.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rocha EPC, Touchon M, Feil EJ: Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1537-1547.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Doak TG, Cavalcanti AR, Stover NA, Dunn DM, Weiss R, Herrick G, Landweber LF: Sequencing the Oxytricha trifallax macronuclear genome: a pilot project. Trends Genet. 2003, 19: 603-607.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    van Helden J, Andre B, Collado-Vides J: Extracting regulatory sites from the upstream region of yeast genes by computational analysis of oligonucleotide frequencies. J Mol Biol. 1998, 281: 827-842.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 955-964.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW: MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: W369-373.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Um JH, Kang CD, Hwang BW, Ha MY, Hur JG, Kim DW, Chung BS, Kim SH: Involvement of DNA-dependent protein kinase in regulation of the mitochondrial heat shock proteins. Leuk Res. 2003, 27: 509-516.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang S, Schlott B, Gorlach M, Grosse F: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) phosphorylates nuclear DNA helicase II/RNA helicase A and hnRNP proteins in an RNA-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 1-10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen Y, Alli Z, Ackerley C, Al-Saud B, Abdelhaleem M: Altered distribution of heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) with dysregulated expression of DHX32. Exp Mol Pathol. 2007, 82 (3): 256-261.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Allison DS, Hall BD: Effects of alterations in the 3' flanking sequence on in vivo and in vitro expression of the yeast SUP4-o tRNATyr gene. Embo J. 1985, 4: 2657-2664.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Platt T: Transcription termination and the regulation of gene expression. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986, 55: 339-372.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bailey TL, Gribskov M: Combining evidence using p-values: application to sequence homology searches. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14: 48-54.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wingender E, Chen X, Hehl R, Karas H, Liebich I, Matys V, Meinhardt T, Pruss M, Reuter I, Schacherer F: TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 316-319.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lescasse R, Yang T, Grisvard J, Villalobo E, Moch C, Baroin-Tourancheau A, Morin L: Gene structure of the ciliate Sterkiella histriomuscorum based on a combined analysis of DNA and cDNA sequences from 21 macronuclear chromosomes. Chromosoma. 2005, 114: 344-351.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Proudfoot NJ, Brownlee GG: 3' non-coding region sequences in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature. 1976, 263: 211-214.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wahle E, Kuhn U: The mechanism of 3' cleavage and polyadenylation of eukaryotic pre-mRNA. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1997, 57: 41-71.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Destables E, Thomas NA, Boxma B, van Alen TA, Staay van der GWM, Hackstein JHP, McEwan NR: The 3' untranslated region of mRNAs from the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis. 2005, 231-236.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Caron F, Meyer E: Does Paramecium primaurelia use a different genetic code in its macronucleus?. Nature. 1985, 314: 185-188.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liang H, Wong JY, Bao Q, Cavalcanti AR, Landweber LF: Decoding the decoding region: analysis of eukaryotic release factor (eRF1) stop codon-binding residues. J Mol Evol. 2005, 60: 337-344.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Perez-Romero P, Villalobo E, Torres A: Different stop codon usage in two pseudohypotrich ciliates. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 205: 259-263.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hoffman DC, Anderson RC, DuBois ML, Prescott DM: Macronuclear gene-sized molecules of hypotrichs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 1279-1283.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Meyer F, Schmidt HJ, Plumper E, Hasilik A, Mersmann G, Meyer HE, Engstrom A, Heckmann K: UGA is translated as cysteine in pheromone 3 of Euplotes octocarinatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 3758-3761.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Landweber LF: The molecular basis of nuclear genetic code change in ciliates. Curr Biol. 2001, 11: 65-74.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Betermier M: Large-scale genome remodelling by the developmentally programmed elimination of germ line sequences in the ciliate Paramecium. Res Microbiol. 2004, 155: 399-408.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Csank C, Taylor FM, Martindale DW: Nuclear pre-mRNA introns: analysis and comparison of intron sequences from Tetrahymena thermophila and other eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 5133-5141.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Dyer BD: Metopus, Cyclidium and Sonderia: ciliates enriched and cultured from sulfureta of a microbial mat community. Biosystems. 1989, 23: 41-51.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ghosh S, Jaraczewski JW, Klobutcher LA, Jahn CL: Characterization of transcription initiation, translation initiation, and poly(A) addition sites in the gene-sized macronuclear DNA molecules of Euplotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 214-221.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kaufmann J, Florian V, Klein A: TGA cysteine codons and intron sequences in conserved and nonconserved positions are found in macronuclear RNA polymerase genes of Euplotes octocarinatus. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20: 5985-5989.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sperling L, Dessen P, Zagulski M, Pearlman RE, Migdalski A, Gromadka R, Froissard M, Keller AM, Cohen J: Random sequencing of Paramecium somatic DNA. Eukaryot Cell. 2002, 1: 341-352.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Helftenbein E, Muller E: Both alpha-tubulin genes are transcriptionally active in Stylonychia lemnae. Curr Genet. 1988, 13: 425-432.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Conzelmann KK, Helftenbein E: Nucleotide sequence and expression of two [beta]-tubulin genes in Stylonychia lemnae. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1987, 198: 643-

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    van Hoek AH, Sprakel VS, van Alen TA, Theuvenet AP, Vogels GD, Hackstein JH: Voltage-dependent reversal of anodic galvanotaxis in Nyctotherus ovalis. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999, 46: 427-433.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Slater GS, Birney E: Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 31-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE: WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1188-1190.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sewer A, Paul N, Landgraf P, Aravin A, Pfeffer S, Brownstein MJ, Tuschl T, van Nimwegen E, Zavolan M: Identification of clustered microRNAs using an ab initio prediction method. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 267-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 113-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 1792-1797.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C: SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996, 12: 543-548.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O: PHYML Online – a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W557-559.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


MH and GR thank Laurent Duret and Jean-François Goût for supplying the intron locations in Paramecium. LFL and WJC thank Jonathan Wong for excellent assistance. We thank the referees for their comments. This work was supported by the European Union 5th framework projects CIMES (Ciliates as Monitors for Environmental Safety, QLK3-2002-02151) and EPISTEM (contract number LSHB-CT-2005-019067).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martijn A Huynen.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

GR did the main sequence analyses and drafted the manuscript. BD and ID determined the genetic code. RdG isolated and sequenced several complete genes and participated in drafting the manuscript. TvA, BB, GvdS, SM-vdS, isolated and sequenced several complete genes. AvH isolated and sequenced several complete genes and made southern blots. WJC sequenced 13 full length chromosomes, LFL supervised WJC and contributed to the manuscript as a whole and the genetic code discussion in particular. JH isolated the cells, initiated and coordinated parts of the study and participated in drafting the manuscript. MH supervised the sequence analysis, determined the intron conservation and finalized the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricard, G., de Graaf, R.M., Dutilh, B.E. et al. Macronuclear genome structure of the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis: Single-gene chromosomes and tiny introns. BMC Genomics 9, 587 (2008).

Download citation


  • Stop Codon
  • Splice Factor
  • Subtelomeric Region
  • Intron Position
  • Intron Length