Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Microarray transcriptional profiling of Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 at low temperature provides insights into cold adaption strategies

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3Email author and
  • 4
BMC Genomics201516:383

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1611-4

  • Received: 10 November 2014
  • Accepted: 1 May 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 was isolated from nodules of the legume Oxytropis arctobia in Canada’s eastern Arctic. This symbiotic bacterium can grow at temperatures ranging from 0 to 30 °C, fix nitrogen at 10 °C, and is one of the best known cold-adapted rhizobia. Despite the economic potential of this bacterium for northern regions, the key molecular mechanisms of its cold adaptation remain poorly understood.

Results

Using a microarray printed with 5760 Arctic Mesorhizobium genomic clones, we performed a partial transcriptome analysis of strain N33 grown under eight different temperature conditions, including both sustained and transient cold treatments, compared with cells grown at room temperature. Cells treated under constant (4 and 10 °C) low temperatures expressed a prominent number of induced genes distinct from cells treated to short-term cold-exposure (<60 min), but exhibited an intermediate expression profile when exposed to a prolonged cold exposure (240 min). The most prominent up-regulated genes encode proteins involved in metabolite transport, transcription regulation, protein turnover, oxidoreductase activity, cryoprotection (mannitol, polyamines), fatty acid metabolism, and membrane fluidity. The main categories of genes affected in N33 during cold treatment are sugar transport and protein translocation, lipid biosynthesis, and NADH oxidoreductase (quinone) activity. Some genes were significantly down-regulated and classified in secretion, energy production and conversion, amino acid transport, cell motility, cell envelope and outer membrane biogenesis functions. This might suggest growth cessation or reduction, which is an important strategy to adjust cellular function and save energy under cold stress conditions.

Conclusion

Our analysis revealed a complex series of changes associated with cold exposure adaptation and constant growth at low temperatures. Moreover, it highlighted some of the strategies and different physiological states that Mesorhizobium strain N33 has developed to adapt to the cold environment of the Canadian high Arctic and has revealed candidate genes potentially involved in cold adaptation.

Keywords

  • α-proteobacteria
  • Genomic library
  • Microarray
  • Gene expression
  • Transcriptomics
  • Quantitative PCR
  • Cold adaptation
  • Nitrogen fixation
  • Arctic Mesorhizobium

Background

Cold temperature is one of the most prevalent abiotic stresses on earth. Microorganisms must develop mechanisms to survive low temperature stress to occupy a cold environmental niche. Previous studies on cold adaptation have been primarily performed on mesophilic bacteria such as E. coli, and the main focus was on the molecular and physiological characteristics of cold shock and cold acclimation proteins (CSPs and CAPs) [1]. In addition, the role of CSPs in mesophilic bacteria has been implicated in transcription efficiency, RNA remodelling, and gene regulation at low temperature [2]. Although all psychro-mesomophilic prokaryotes react to low temperature changes by common mechanisms [3], their levels of reactions vary due to genomic diversity and specific cold adaptive features [4]. For instance, cold adaption depends on many factors, such as access to energy resources, amino acid substitution in cold-active enzymes [5, 6], effective substrate transport systems [7, 8], and diversity of occupied niches [4]. Cold temperature is perceived by various elements including membrane-associated sensors (methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins [MCPs]) and the cytoplasmic response regulator [9, 10]. As a consequence of the action of cold sensors, a set of cold-regulated genes are activated [9], RNA/DNA conformation is altered [11], and a wide variety of genes involved in transcription, translation, and replication are affected [12, 13]. Reaction to low temperature in different cold adapted bacteria is associated with metabolic changes: increasing the membrane fluidity, integration of ice binding and antifreeze proteins (IBPs, AFPs) [14] and pigments (carotenoids) into the cell membrane [15, 16], phosphorylation of lipopolysaccharides [17], accumulation of compatible solute in cells [13, 18], and chaperone protein expression [1921]. The compatible solutes and chaperonin proteins prevent the aggregation and denaturation of macromolecules, facilitate transcription and translation efficiency, and thus play a crucial role in low temperature adaptation [9]. A proteomic study has shown that a CSP is the low temperature trigger factor in Antarctic Pseudoalteromonas haloplankis and acts as the primary chaperone interacting with newly synthesized polypeptides [22]. When two chaperonin genes from the marine psychrophillic Antarctic bacterium (Oleispira antarctica) were transferred into E. coli, the recombinant cells were able to grow 38-fold faster at 10 °C and 141-fold faster at 8 °C than the parental strain [21]. It has been shown that transcript stability (half-life) is a gene regulation strategy in response to cold shock in bacteria [23]. Our metabolomics study on Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 was able to identify 110 compounds involved in central carbon metabolism, essential biosynthetic pathways, secondary metabolism, and lipids under different low temperature treatments [24]. Arctic Mesorhizobium sp. strain N33 [25] is a psychrotrophic N2-fixing symbiotic bacterium isolated from nodules of the indigenous legume Oxytropis arctobia from Canada’s eastern Arctic region [26]. Strain N33 is a natural streptomycin resistant mutant, and is amenable to genetic manipulation [27, 28]. Like its closely related strain N31, it has a growth range between 0 °C and 30 °C [29] and can establish an efficient N2-fixing symbiosis with the temperate legume sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia). This feature allows legumes to grow 40 % faster and provide 30 % higher yield compared to temperate rhizobia at low temperature on land that is cold and poor in nitrogen [30]. We hypothesized that since the Mesorhizobium strain N33 has the capacity to survive and grow at low temperatures, we could observe transcriptome changes in cells exposed to suboptimal temperatures. Elucidating the low temperature transcriptome may highlight molecular mechanisms of cold adaptation in this Arctic bacterium [30]. To this end, we employed a DNA microarray printed with genomic clones to investigate the partial transcriptome of strain N33 subjected to sustained suboptimal temperatures (4 °C and 10°) and transient cold treatments, compared to cells grown at 21 °C. Statistical analyses, gene annotation, and data mining revealed that microarray gene expression profiling offers new insights into how part of the genome of Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 responds to low temperature and described many molecular changes related to cold adaptation.

Results and discussion

Using genomic clones for transcriptome analysis under cold adaption

We prepared a genomic library containing 5760 clones from Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 (Additional file 1). The amplicons were printed on glass slides, and hybridized with labelled cDNAs using microarray technology to assess the global responses of strain N33 subjected to different hypothermic conditions. We compared gene expression during two constant low temperature conditions (GT4 = 4 °C and GT10 = 10 °C) and during transient cold stress treatments (4 °C for T1 = 2 min, T2 = 4 min, T3 = 8 min, T4 = 60 min, T5 = 240 min) to the reference sample at room temperature (condition T0, GT21). Microarray analysis provided reproducible results over all biological and technical replicates. After filtering, a subset of 4603 clones was generated for analysis. One-way ANOVA revealed 424 clones showing significant (p ≤ 0.005) differential expression across all microarray hybridization experiments (Additional file 2). These 424 genomic clones were sequenced from both ends using the forward (SL1) and reverse (SR2) p SMART clone vector primers. Genomic clones containing more than one gene were excluded from further consideration. The remaining clone sequences were assembled into 111 singleton clone (assembled from the SL1 and SR2 primer sequence products) and 23 contig sequences (assembled sequences from more than two overlapping genomic clone sequences), from herein referred to as genomic clones (Additional file 3).

Comparing these sequences to sequenced genomes in NCBI revealed that the closest sequenced relatives of strain N33 are M. loti and M. ciceri, exhibiting sequence identity ranging from 82 to 94 % (data not shown). This is in agreement with Laguerre et al. [25] who had evaluated the genotypic diversity of 44 rhizobial isolates originating from different geographic locations including the Canadian Arctic region and had placed strain N33 in the same 16S rRNA type as a reference M. ciceri strain. We also calculated that the G + C content of these sequences was 63 mol%, which is very close to the % GC of M. loti (62.93) and M. ciceri (62.56).

Self-organizing map (SOM) clustering across all treatments revealed 3 clusters of expression patterns (Additional file 3). The first cluster contained 43 genomic clones representing genes mainly up-regulated when transiently exposed to 4 °C and reduced after 240 min exposure to 4 °C or constant low temperature (GT4, GT10). The second cluster of genes represented by 28 genomic clones was mainly up-regulated at condition T5, and slightly at condition T4, as compared to the reference sample (T0, 21 °C). The last cluster (63 genomic clones) exhibited up-regulation during constant cold conditions GT4 and GT10. A global view of the gene expression profiles of the 134 genes in strain N33 at different hypothermic conditions revealed that the expression fold changes ranged from −11.1 to +3.71 (Additional file 3).

Clustering of the orthologous groups of proteins (COGs)

To functionally characterize the Arctic Mesorhizobium partial transcriptome, the COG functional category was assigned for each gene within the 134 genomic clones (Additional file 3). The main functional categories were metabolism (37 %), cellular processes (19 %), information storage and processing (13 %), and unknown or poorly characterized function (31 %). A closer examination of the 134 genomic clones revealed 17 COG classes. COG classes C (energy production, 11.2 %), E (amino acid transport and metabolism, 11.2 %), G (carbohydrate transport, 8.2 %), R (general function prediction, 6.7 %), K (transcription, 5.2 %), and J (translation, 4.5 %) were the most-represented functional categories of genes differentially expressed during cold stress in Mesorhizobium strain N33 (Additional file 3). The percentage of expressed genes per category provides an overall estimate of which COG classes are most affected by cold acclimation.

Pairwise comparisons between transcriptome profiles and annotation

We focused on the genes within the 73 genomic clones which exhibited a minimum threshold of ± 1.5 fold expression change (p < 0.005) between at least two treatments (Additional file 4). To group similar expression profiles, self-organizing maps (SOM) revealed 3 clusters (Fig. 1A). The first cluster contained 25 genes that were mainly up-regulated when transiently exposed to 4 °C and reduced after a 4 h exposure to 4 °C or constant low temperature (GT4, GT10). The second cluster of 12 genes was mainly up-regulated after a 4 h cold treatment as compared to the reference sample (T0, 21 °C) while the last cluster (36 genes) exhibited up-regulation during constant cold conditions (GT4, GT10). The pairwise comparisons between transcriptome data indicated that more genes were differentially regulated at 4 and 10 °C, and many genes were similarly expressed under these two conditions (Fig. 1B). Likewise, a marked effect of temperature on the composition of fatty acids and water-soluble metabolites in N33 was observed in our metabolomics analysis when cells were grown under constant cold conditions at 4 °C or 10 °C [24]. We found that only a few genes were differentially up-regulated during the transient cold treatments (60 min or less; T1, T2, T3, and T4), except for condition T5 (4 h) which showed an intermediate response (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Expression profiles of 73 significantly regulated genes (p < 0.005, ≥ ± 1.5 FC) for Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33. Self-organizing map clusters represent the expression patterns at different suboptimal treatments (A). Histograms showing numbers of significantly expressed genes under various hypothermic conditions (B)

qRT-PCR validation of microarray results

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the genes identified within 54 selected clones to confirm the gene expression profiles suggested by the microarray data. Based on the geNorm algorithm analysis [31], we identified six genes (Additional file 5) whose expression levels showed very little variability and represented average expression stability below 0.15 (M ≤ 15). We selected the three most stable transcripts (clones MrN33-01a03, MrN33-19d03, and MrN33-04d09) and applied them as references for qRT-PCR gene expression analysis [32]. The REST-2008 software [33] showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in relative gene expression among the 54 selected transcripts. The pair-wise comparison of the Log2 expression ratios between 54 clones data obtained by qRT-PCR and microarray showed a consistent (|r| = 0.77, p <0.001) correlation coefficient between the two technologies [34] (Fig. 2, Additional file 5).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Correlation between qRT-PCR and microarray data: Correlation between the Log2 fold change of 54 genes (with 8 samples over 3 biological replicates) in qRT-PCR and microarray data from Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 is represented

KEGG and COG classification

The 73 selected sequences exhibiting >1.5 fold change in expression were classified into 14 different categories using the KEGG and COG databases indicating their involvement in many different cellular functions during cold acclimation (Fig. 3; Additional file 4). Fifty eight percent of the sequences could not be assigned to any category (NA). These putative genes suggest a large knowledge gap in prokaryotic cold adaptation. Other studies have also identified many differentially expressed transcripts encoding unknown functions under sub-zero growth in Exiguobacterium sibiricum and P. halocryophilus Or1 [7, 35], which are more suitable for further investigation. The most prevalent categories include lipid and fatty acid biosynthesis, flagellum structure, protein translocation, transcriptional regulation, ribosomal proteins, replication machinery, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, Heme O / coenzymes transport, energy production and arginine metabolism, replication machinery and DNA polymerase III, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Categories of 73 significant genes assigned in KEGG and COG databases: The 73 significant (p < 0.005, ≥ ± 1.5 FC) genes were classified into 14 different categories with diverse cellular functions. NA = Not available in KEGG / COG databases

Signal transduction

The survival of cells requires the ability to sense environmental conditions [36]. Unlike other bacteria [9] whose two-component signal transduction histidine kinase genes were mainly up-regulated and involved in early perception of cold stress, we did not identify any histidine kinase genes clearly upregulated during early cold stress. However, as only a partial transcriptome was profiled, there may be more potential histidine kinase genes in strain N33 that were not explored in this study. During constant cold conditions (4 and 10 °C), the expression levels of three genes (represented by MrN33-29f04, MrN33-168, and MrN33-124) were suppressed (Fig. 4, group T; Additional file 6). It has been shown that two component signal transduction systems can be involved in many functions including secretion, biofilm formation, cell differentiation and targeted transcriptional regulation [37]. Down regulation of two histidine kinase genes (MrN33-168 and MrN33-124) in N33 could be involved in the control of metabolite secretion at low temperatures since histidine kinases can act as communication interfaces in bacteria [37].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Heat maps of selected differentially expressed genes of Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33. Genes were selected from 73 genomic clones/contigs (Additional file 4), grouped by clusters of orthologous group (COG) category from T to R (see Additional file 6), and described by gene ontology (GO). Comparisons between transcriptomics data sets of different cold treatment conditions (GT4, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, and GT10) are shown in columns. Values are expressed as ratio fold changes (−6.67 to 3.71). The 52 selected genes were differentially expressed in at least one data set (p < 0.005, ≥ ± 1.5 FC), and the corresponding data is available in Additional file 6. Gene expression fold-change ranges from black (up regulation) to light grey (down regulation)

Energy production, cryoprotectants, carbohydrate transport and metabolism

The majority of genes required for energy production that are represented on the array are down regulated at constant suboptimal conditions of 4 and 10 °C (Fig. 4, group C; Additional file 6), with the exception of the NADH dehydrogenase (MrN33-138) and the electron carrier heme-iron binding encoding gene (MrN33-175). Transcript levels of one heme-binding electron carrier gene (MrN33-174) increased after short-term cold treatment (T1 = 2 min, and T4 = 60 min). The expression levels of a putative hydrolase gene (MrN33-39c09) increased during the 240 min treatment at 4 °C (Fig. 4, group C; Additional file 6). The increased abundance of these above-mentioned transcripts may help to maintain cellular energy metabolism at low temperatures to compensate for low growth rate [38]. Despite the repression of many genes involved in energy production under cold stress conditions in Mesorhizobium strain N33, transcript levels encoding proteins in carbohydrate metabolism increased, possibly to compensate for nutrient limitations.

Transporter proteins in bacteria are at the primary interface with the environment. ABC transporters are a major family of membrane transport proteins that enable the acquisition and efflux of a broad range of nutrients and metabolites in cells [39, 40]. Several genes (Fig. 4, group G; Additional file 6) encoding predicted transporters (MrN33-112, MrN33-95, MrN33-63, and MrN33-189) are induced during constant growth either at 4 °C or 10 °C, some of which may be responding to the need for carbohydrate reserves under cold stress. Genomic clone MrN33-189 encodes a predicted periplasmic mannitol-binding protein (PMBP) and is induced during constant cold conditions (GT4 and GT10), and suppressed in transient cold exposure conditions; this protein may assimilate mannitol from the culture media to increase cold tolerance. In addition to a carbohydrate source, mannitol is a cryoprotectant and compatible solute which prevents the aggregation and denaturation of cellular proteins [9]. Cryo-protectants (metabolites and proteins) stabilize cytoplasmic macromolecules and phospholipid bilayers, prevent or reduce ice-crystal formation and freezing damage in bacterial cells at low temperatures [41, 42]. Metabolomics analysis of Mesorhizobium strain N33 has confirmed that mannitol accumulates at constant cold growth conditions (GT4 and GT10), as do other compatible solutes (isobutyrate, sarcosine, threonine and valine) [24]. A reverse genetics experiment [43] could elucidate whether mannitol is assimilated from the culture media or synthesized de novo.

Amino acid, nucleotide transport and metabolism, translation and ribosomal biogenesis

Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 transcription profiles indicate the induction of amino acid and nucleotide transport systems likely to increase protein biosynthesis during growth at constant low temperatures. In particular, the expression levels of many genes that encode purine biosynthetic enzymes (MrN33-43), amino acid metabolic enzymes (MrN33-64, MrN33-159), and transport proteins (MrN33-76, MrN33-10, MrN33-119, MrN33-162), increased during cold treatment, indicating that individual amino acids, proteins and purines may be used as nitrogen and carbon sources, or could be used in new protein synthesis [7, 13] (Fig. 4, groups E, F; Additional file 6). In our previous metabolomics study, we determined that amino acids sarcosine, threonine, and valine levels increased during growth at 4 °C and after short term exposure to 4 °C; thus, they could play a role in conferring cold acclimation to strain N33 by acting as cryoprotectants [24]. We also have observed that some genes involved in translation and ribosomal biogenesis increased in Mesorhizobium N33 growing at constant suboptimal temperatures of 4 and 10 °C (Fig. 4, group J; Additional file 6).

Defence against reactive oxygen species (ROS), protein turnover and chaperones

At low temperatures, the solubility of gases and stability of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increase and would be deleterious to cells [22]. Some psychrophillic bacteria have developed mechanisms to protect their cells against ROS for growth at low temperatures [7, 13, 22]. For instance, Colwellia psychrerythraea and Desulfotalea psychrophila each have several copies of catalase and superoxide dismutase genes to protect their cells against deleterious ROS [44]. Planococcus halocryophilus Or1 is able to protect against ROS by inducing five genes encoding MsrA, a methionine sulfoxide reductase involved in reversing oxidative damage to methionine [7]. In our experiment, Mo-molybdopterin cofactor (clone MrN33-79), involved in coenzyme transport and metabolism (Fig. 4, group H; Additional file 6), is induced in N33 cells grown at 4 and 10 °C. This cofactor is an essential element for diverse enzymes involved in protecting the cells against toxic compounds including ROS and increases the adaptability of psychrophilic bacteria to cope with low temperatures [22, 45]. The genome sequence analysis of the Antarctica bacterium P. haloplanktis TAC125 [22] indicated how the genome has adapted to protect the cells against ROS.

Transcription factors and regulators

Genomic contig MrN33-45 contains a DNA binding transcription factor gene that was induced at a constant cold treatment of 10 °C (Fig. 4, group K; Fig. 5; Additional file 6). The gene within clone MrN33-18, encoding a cold shock protein with nucleic acid binding activity, was suppressed under constant cold treatment (GT4, GT10) but induced after 1 h and 4 h (T4, T5) exposure to 4 °C (Fig. 4, group K; Additional files 5 and 6). Cold shock proteins act as chaperones, are involved in protein and nucleic acid folding, facilitate mRNA unwinding, translation initiation, ribosome assembly, RNA metabolism and degradation at low temperature in cold adapted bacteria [20, 21, 44, 46]. It has been reported that an excess of cspA mRNA is poisonous to the cells [47], and the protein level may remain high only up to a certain time at low temperatures [48].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Selected genes related to cold tolerance that are up-regulated in at least one hypothermic treatment condition. These are candidate genes for further functional investigation using reverse genetics. The data for up regulated and down regulated genes are shown based on fold change ratio relative to room temperature conditions. The seven hypothermic treatment conditions (from GT10 to GT4) are depicted on the graph on the right and the name of the representative genomic clone / contig is listed on the left

Cell envelope, outer membrane biogenesis, and lipid metabolism

The bacterial cell wall and cell membrane act as protective barriers against many environmental stresses including low temperature. The expression levels of three genes (represented by MrN33-178, MrN33-19, and MrN33-03d09) decreased during constant cold treatment of 4 °C and 10 °C and their respective proteins are predicted to possess glycosyl transferase activity, lytic transglycosylase and nucleotidyl transferase activity (Fig. 4, Group M; Additional file 6). A predicted lytic transglycosylase (MrN33-19) was induced at transient suboptimal temperatures (T1, Additional file 5). Lytic transglycosylase acts on peptidoglycan, is responsible for creating space within the peptidoglycan chamber for its biosynthesis and recycling, cell division, and cell wall metabolism, and is required for the assembly of the flagellum and the pilus [49]. Our results corroborate previous observations indicating that different cell envelope modifications were affected at low temperature in the gram-negative Psychrobacter arcticus [50]. The down regulation of those three transcripts can be seen as an adjustment to low temperature as has been observed for many genes involved in energy metabolism. We observed that a gene within clone MrN33-180, which encodes a long-chain fatty acid transport protein, was significantly up regulated when cells were grown in steady cold at 4 °C or 10 °C and in response to 4 h exposure to 4 °C (T5), and suppressed at transient suboptimal conditions (Fig. 4, group I; Additional file 6). Principal components analysis (PCA) of the metabolomic fatty acid profiles from the four lipid classes [24] revealed that N33 cells grown at suboptimal low temperatures (4 °C and 10 °C) are clustered into a distinct group from the cells exposed to 4 °C for 2 to 240 min, thereby suggesting a significant association between gene expression and metabolite stress response at low temperatures. These findings strongly suggest that lipid metabolism and fatty acid changes in strain N33 might be essential for the adaptation to temperature downshifts. Conversion of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids and branched fatty acids in the cell membrane and the biosynthesis of new phospholipid head groups provide the necessary cell membrane fluidity to withstand low temperatures [7, 13, 51].

DNA Replication, recombination and repair

The gene represented by clone MrN33-31, encoding a methyltransferase, is significantly up-regulated after 240 min (condition T5) of cold acclimation and suppressed during transient cold acclimation. Genes within contig MrN33-191, encoding a DEAD-box protein which may act as a RNA helicase, and MrN33-6, encoding an excinuclease, were suppressed at 4 and 10 °C, but were shown to increase during transient cold treatments after 4 min (T2) and 8 min (T3) (Fig. 4, group L; Additional files 5 and 6). The role of RNA helicase has been studied in different psychrophillic microorganisms [19] in which it helps to unwind the RNA secondary structure for efficient transcription and translation at low temperature. Previous studies on psychrophillic and mesophilic prokaryotes have indicated the role and importance of exoribonuclease, chaperonin proteins, helicase (DEAD-box proteins) in nucleotide excision repair pathways, RNA degradation and cold adaptation [2, 19, 46, 52]. It was shown that RNA degradation at low temperatures helps the cells to adapt its RNA metabolism for subsequent growth at low temperatures [2]. These changes provide cold tolerance ability by facilitating many cellular functions including transcription efficiency, RNA and protein integrity, translation initiation and ribosome assembly at low temperature [19, 20].

Cell motility, secretion and biofilm formation

Six genes involved in secretion and cell motility are regulated by low temperature treatments (Fig. 4, group N; Additional file 6). The gene within contig MrN33-137 is induced during prolonged cold acclimation (T5) at 4 °C and encodes a flagellin (flaA) protein involved in the flagellum structure and biogenesis pathway (Fig. 3). Clone MrN33-40 represents a gene encoding a sugar efflux transmembrane transporter and is significantly up-regulated during constant growth at 4 °C. This transporter may be involved in the production of EPS (exopolysaccharide) and biofilm formation and help to protect the cells against cold temperature [53]. In this work, we observed EPS production increase in Mesorhizobium strain N33 during constant growth at 4 °C. It has been shown that genes involved in EPS synthesis, such as tyrosine kinase (EpsD) and glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase, were induced at −15 °C in psychrophillic bacterium [7]. In addition, the gene within clone MrN33-62, encoding a polyamine-transporting ATPase, was induced at both 4 and 10 °C acclimation (Fig. 5). In E.coli, it has been shown that polyamines act as compatible solutes under cold acclimation conditions to help provide appropriate ionic conditions and promote the initiation of protein biosynthesis by the ribosome [54]. We also point out that two genes (MrN33-108, MrN33-51), which encode membrane transporter processive enzymes for secretory proteins and belong to the pre protein translocase pathway, were highly suppressed at 4 and 10 °C and during the 240 min exposure to 4 °C (T5), but they were shown to increase during transient cold acclimation (Additional files 5 and 6). Pre proteins bind to translocase and trigger cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis so that pre protein substrates are transported at the expense of energy [55]. Suppression of certain housekeeping genes and metabolic activity including secretion could be a general response but important strategy to provide tolerance under cold stress conditions [56]. Some general response mechanisms to low temperature include higher turnover of macromolecules, tighter maintenance of intercellular pH, greater osmotic regulation, and motility, cessation of biomass production, and reduction of the activation energy before a pre-exponential growth phase [24, 56]. A gene (MrN33-118) that encodes a potassium transporter (Fig. 4, group P; Additional file 6) was suppressed under constant cold treatments (GT4, GT10), implying inhibitory controls over transmembrane ion movement to possibly save energy during cold conditions.

Formation of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing nodules during cold stress

It has been shown that ß-glucan is implicated in the attachment of the bacterial cells to plant roots for the initiation of the symbiotic interaction [57]. ß-glucan also has an important role in hypo-osmotic adaptation [58]. Interestingly, the ß-glucan-transporting ATPase-encoding transcript MrN33-42b04 (Fig. 4, group Q; Additional file 6) was only induced (1.55 FC) during cold acclimation at condition GT10. As Arctic strains are more competitive than temperate strains in forming nodules at 10 °C in symbiosis with the temperate legume sainfoin (Onobrychis vicifolia) [59], our results suggest that the ß-glucan-transporting ATPase may play a crucial role in initiating symbiosis at low temperatures.

Conclusions

The first partial transcriptome analysis of Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 under three different growing temperatures (4 °C, 10 °C and 21 °C), and cells exposed to a suboptimal temperature (4 °C) over a time course (2, 4, 8, 60 and 240 min) not only illustrated gene expression trends during cold treatment but also revealed some key molecular responses to low temperatures (Fig. 4). This experimental design was used to study the strain N33 transcriptome exposed to sub optimal temperatures because: i) strain N33 is able to nodulate and fix nitrogen at 10 °C while temperate rhizobia are inactive, and ii) this bacterium can still grow and survive at 4 °C albeit at a lower rate [60]. We were also interested in looking at gene expression changes after short exposures to cold (4 °C). We used 5760 genomic clones on microarray slides for gene expression analysis and focused on expression data for 134 genes significantly differentially expressed across treatments. This technological approach was taken since there was no genome sequence available for strain N33.

The low temperature transcriptome of strain N33 has revealed complex changes associated with cold exposure adaptation and constant growth at low temperature. The comparison of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of other psychrophillic prokaryotes confirmed that cold adaptation is the result of multiple molecular changes in the cells [7, 13]. The greatest number of transcriptome changes in N33 during cold exposure was observed in genes involved in energy production and conversion, amino acid and carbohydrate transport and metabolism, translation, transcription, cell motility and secretion, cell envelope, and outer membrane biogenesis. Some of these changes have been observed in previous work on low temperature in other bacteria [8, 50]. Many of the transcripts identified encode proteins of unknown function, indicating our lack of knowledge of cold adaptation in prokaryotes. Further investigation of these genes will expand our insight into molecular traits for low temperature adaptation.

We observed that some genes that were significantly down-regulated are involved in housekeeping activities (e.g. metabolism, secretion, energy production, cell envelope and outer membrane biogenesis). Suppression of certain housekeeping genes at constant low temperature can reduce cell metabolism, conserve energy, and can be considered as an important tolerance strategy during cold stress. These results indicate that the physiological states of Mesorhizobium strain N33 are very different between short term and steady state cold exposure. Many more transcripts were significantly up or down regulated during the constant low temperature growth conditions compared to short term cold exposure.

Validation of candidate gene function (Fig. 5) using reverse genetics and site directed mutagenesis [43] is of interest in expanding our insights into molecular traits for low temperature adaptation in Mesorhizobium strain N33. The in-depth characterization of the transcriptomes using RNA-seq and whole genome sequence analysis of N33, currently underway, is the next step to identifying new cold adapted genes in strain N33. Furthermore, combining our metabolomics analysis [24] and future proteomics work will provide a system biology approach to understand cold adaptation in Arctic Mesorhizobium strain N33 to enhance nitrogen-fixing capacity and improve other agricultural traits in Canadian and other northern climates.

Methods

Bacterial strains, media cultures and growth conditions

The Mesorhizobium sp. strain N33 used in this study was previously isolated from Arctic legume Oxytropis arctobia [26]. Frozen glycerol stocks of strain N33 were used to inoculate 20 ml yeast mannitol broth (YMB) medium containing 200 μg ml−1 streptomycin [61] and incubated at 21 °C for 5 days on a rotary shaker (180 rpm). The purity of colonies was checked by cultivation on yeast extract mannitol agar (YMA) supplemented with 200 μg ml−1 streptomycin and 25 μg ml−1 Congo red [62]. Subsequent purity tests of the strain were conducted by performing a nodulation test on Onobrychis viciifolia (sainfoin), and by 16S-rDNA sequencing [63]. The sequence has been deposited in the NCBI nucleotide data base under accession number JX470579.

Construction of genomic library and generation of target clones for microarray

Mesorhizobium strain N33 cells were grown in 100 ml of YMB media at 150 rpm at room temperature (~21 °C) to mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.4-0.6). The cells were precipitated, washed in TES buffer [64], and centrifuged (10,000 g) at 4 °C. Whole genomic DNA isolation was performed as described in 1989 by Laberge et al. [65] and DNA stored at −20 °C. DNA quality was verified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and by agarose gel (1 %) electrophoresis. Two μg of DNA was mechanically sheared using a nebulizer (Unomedical INC, McAllen, TX) under a nitrogen pressure of 20 psi for 3 min. DNA fragments ranging from 0.3–2 kb were subsequently blunt-ended using T4 DNA polymerase and Klenow DNA polymerase (Lucigen, Mississauga, ON), ligated into a pSMART-HC Kan vector (Lucigen), and transformed into electro-competent E. coli DH5α cells (Bio-Rad, Mississaugua, ON). Plasmid inserts were amplified by standard PCR from 5760 clones using the universal forward (SL1 = 5’-CAGTCCAGTTACGCTGGAGTC-3’) and reverse primers (SR2 = 5’-GGTCAGGTATGATTTAAATGGTCAGT-3’) complementary to vector sequences flanking the DNA inserts. Clones were digested with EcoRI (Boehringer Mannheim, Laval, QC) and fragment size and purity were evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Some inserts were sequenced to verify that they were bona fide Rhizobium sequences by blast analysis with the GenBank database.

Microarray printing

PCR reactions from the Mesorhizobium strain N33 library were purified using the QIAquick 96 PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Mississaugua, ON) and transferred into the 384 master plate format using a Multiprobe II EX Robotic Liquid Handling System (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT). Plates were then dried without heat in a DNA 120 Speed Vac (Savant Instruments Inc., Holbrook, NY). Dried samples were resuspended in 10 μl of 3XSSC and stored at −80 °C. A total of 13,056 features, consisting of duplicate spots for each clone and 32 spike-in and negative controls for each block were arranged and printed on Corning GAPS II coated slides, as per Corning instructions. Arrays were printed using the BioRobotics MicroGrid Compact spotter (Digilab Inc, Holliston, MA). The arrays were snap-dried and DNA UV cross-linked to the slides using a CL-1000 ultraviolet cross linker (UPV, Upland, CA) for a total of 300 mJ.

RNA purification

A total of 8 conditions with 3 biological replicates, previously used for a metabolomic analyses of N33 [24], were screened in this experiment. N33 cells were grown in YMB medium to mid-log phase under three steady state growing temperature conditions (21 °C = control, GT21; GT4 = 4 °C, and GT10 = 10 °C). For the cold stress treatments, mid-log phase cells grown at 21 °C (T0) were exposed to 4 °C for different time points (T1 = 2 min, T2 = 4 min, T3 = 8 min, T4 = 60 min, T5 = 240 min in a rotary shaker water bath (150 rpm). After each treatment and before harvest of cells, transcription activity was halted by adding a stop solution [66]. The samples were immediately centrifuged (10,000 g) at 4 °C for 5 min. The pellets were washed once with cold TES buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris hydrochloride [pH 7.4]), re-centrifuged, and cells frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −85 °C. Total RNA was purified using the Epicenter Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol with additional modifications: i) Small RNAs, proteins, carbohydrates, and DNA were precipitated with 5 M LiCl (Ambion). ii) DNA was also removed from RNA samples using DNase I (Ambion). Lack of DNA contamination of RNA samples was verified by standard PCR using one pair of primers from the OrfZ gene [28] of strain N33. RNA concentration was determined using the NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer at 260 nm. RNA purity and integrity were assessed [64] by electrophoresis on a density gradient 1 % agarose/formaldehyde gel and using the Experion automated electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad).

cDNA synthesis and labelling

cDNA synthesis, labelling, purification and hybridization were performed based on a protocol from The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR, now the J. Craig Venter Institute) (ftp://ftp.jcvi.org/pub/data/PFGRC/MAIN/pdf_files/protocols/M007.pdf). Labelled probes were quantified on the NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer and yields were calculated in picomoles of cDNA synthesized and Cy-dye incorporation. The labelled cDNA was dried in a vacuum centrifuge with medium heat for 45–60 min and stored at 4 °C in the dark. Human clones (~300 bp in length), purchased from Michigan State University were used as internal spike-in controls for hybridization.

Microarray procedures

Two-colour hybridizations were performed using the samples from all cold treatments as “test” samples and the N33 room temperature sample as the “reference”. Dye-flip hybridizations were performed for each sample combination with three biological replicates for a total of 42 hybridizations. The labelled probes were combined with a solution containing 2 μl of calf thymus ss-DNA (10 mg/ml, Sigma), 2 μl Yeast tRNA (10 mg/ml, Invitrogen) and 61 μl of DIG easy hybridization buffer (Roche), denatured at 70 °C for 2 min and hybridized with the arrays at 37 °C for 8–18 h. Following incubation, the arrays were washed three times at 50 °C for 15 min in 1X SSC-0.1 % SDS, rinsed in 1x SSC and spun 5 min (1000 rpm) at room temperature. The slides were scanned sequentially at 532 and 635 nm using a Genepix 4200A microarray scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Features were aligned in Genepix Pro 6.0 using the Irregular Features Spot Finder application and local background subtraction. Low quality features were flagged and filtered from further analysis. The raw data files were named using strain abbreviation, hybridization time date and slide number (i.e. MrN33-080326-13723296.gpr). The complete set of data for the N33 gene expression microarray experiment is available on the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) web site [67] under the accession number (GSE60710). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE60710.

Normalization and data analysis

Arrays were imported into Acuity 4 (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA Axon Instruments Inc.) for data normalization and analysis. The arrays were re-named by test treatment, test dye and biological replicate, respectively (i.e. GT4_3_BR1). Lowess normalization was applied to each array [68, 69]. Data was filtered by removing features flagged in Genepix as low quality and removing spike-in controls and negative control features. Furthermore, we removed features with “Lowess A” intensities ≤8 in at least 32 of the arrays (75 %). The data type was changed to Lowess M log2 ratio. After the filtering steps, 4603 clones sequence remained in the dataset. Pearson centred hierarchical clustering analysis was carried out on the dataset and supported strong reproducibility of the technical and biological replicates across all treatments. Clustering was performed for data set over all treatments using self-organizing maps. To summarize the data set on an interval scale and show the variability of expression levels (log2 ratios) a box-whisker plot was created with the data using Genespring software (Agilent Technologies, Sunnyvale, CA, Version 11.5.1). The box-whisker plot [70] of expression levels represented the range of log2 ratios and a normal distribution over all the data range obtained in different cold treatments (data not shown). To narrow down the most differentially expressed clones based on a pattern of changes among different hypothermic conditions, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the Lowess M Log2 ratio data. Clones identified using ANOVA at p ≤ 0.005 (424 clones) were designated as differentially regulated datasets. The lists and names of 424 clones and their statistical p-value are available in Additional file 2. The false positive rates for the filtered transcripts were calculated (23 false positives expected for 424 clones at p ≤ 0.005) [71], and clustering was performed based on the individual SOM clusters and using Euclidean squared distances. In order to determine which of the 424 clones (p ≤ 0.005) are changing across all seven hypothermic conditions, an additional clustering using principal component analysis (PCA) [72] was performed (data not shown). We followed the criteria that are described in MIAME [73] for the microarray experiment and data analysis.

Quantitative PCR

To validate the microarray results, qRT-PCR was carried out for 54 genes over 24 sscDNAs samples previously used for microarray hybridization. The Primer3-plus software [74] was used to design primers to recognize the specific gene within each genomic clone. The primer pairs used in qRT-PCR for each clone is shown in Additional file 5. Each sscDNA sample was synthesized from 10 μg of purified total RNA sample (as described previously) using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and Random primer Hexamers (Promega) at a final concentration of 25 ng/μl [66] with minor optimizations. The single-strand cDNAs were purified using QIAquick (Qiagen) PCR purification columns. The continuous fluorescent signals (SYBR Green I kit, Qiagen, Germany) detection was performed in a total of 35 cycles using the Applied Biosystem 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR device in 384-well microplates. Each well contained 10 ng of sscDNA and a primer set (0.4 μM) in a 10 μl reaction mix. The specificity of primer sets were determined by dissociation curves and agarose gel electrophoresis. The qRT-PCR products were verified by randomly sequencing 30 PCR amplicons. The three most stably expressed genes were identified using gNorm algorithm and used as internal controls [31]. Quantification of the relative gene expression changes of the genes of interest were identified using the Cq (2-ΔΔCT) method [75] by comparison with the reference genes. The REST 2008 software [33] was used to verify the significant levels (p-values) of the gene expression. The experimental details on qRT-PCR analysis were based on the MIQE guidelines [32].

Sequencing, bioinformatics, functional annotations and classification

The 424 differentially expressed clones (p < 0.005) were sequenced, assembled into 134 clones /contigs using SeqMan software (Lasergene, Inc.) (after discarding chimeric genomic clones) and annotated through NCBI GenBank, UniProtKB, KEGG, COG, and GO (Gene Ontology) molecular function via the QuickGO browser version 59 [76]. To decrease the number of sequences coding for hypothetical proteins, a literature-based GO annotation screen was applied, and all generated annotations were manually curated and reviewed. To assign transcripts into orthologous functional groups (COGs) and metabolic pathways [77], the differentially expressed sequences were translated into peptide sequences which were used to search in the COGnitor browser [78]. The COG database can now be searched using RPS-BLAST through the Conserved Domain Database web site, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi. We clustered the orthologus groups of proteins into higher and more detailed levels of functional groups using the COGs database (Additional file 3). Biochemical pathways were determined using COG and KEGG databases (Additional files 3 and 4). Clones/contigs were filtered and sorted based on the expression ratio (p < 0.005, ≥1.5 FC). The GC content of DNA sequences was calculated using the online tool http://www.sciencelauncher.com/oligocalc.html. The complete list of the genomic clones/contigs and their annotation is provided in Additional file 3. The consensus sequences for 134 clones/contigs were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers JX668791- JX668986, KR133469-KR133484).

Availability of supporting data

The dataset supporting the results of this article is available in the NCBI GEO repository under accession GSE60710.

The consensus sequences for 134 genomic clones/contigs were deposited in NCBI GenBank (accession numbers JX668791 - JX668986, KR133469 - KR133484). All other supporting data are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

CSPs: 

Cold shock proteins

CAPs: 

Cold acclimation proteins

MCPs: 

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins

IBPs: 

Ice binding proteins

AFPs: 

Antifreeze proteins

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

SOM: 

Self-organizing maps

COGs: 

Clustering of the orthologous groups of proteins

NA: 

Not available

GO annotation: 

Gene ontology annotation

FC: 

Fold change

EPS: 

Exopolysaccharide

NADH: 

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase

PMBP: 

Periplasmic mannitol-binding protein

ROS: 

Defence against reactive oxygen species

KEGG: 

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real-time PCR

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

MCSP: 

Major cold shock proteins

RNA-seq: 

RNA sequencing

YMA: 

Yeast extract mannitol agar

BLAST: 

Basic local alignment search tool

TES: 

Tris-EDTA solution

LiCl: 

Lithium chloride

cDNA: 

Complementary DNA

TIGR: 

The Institute for Genomic Research

SDS: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

GEO: 

Gene Expression Omnibus

LOWESS: 

Locally-weighted-regression

MIAME: 

minimum information about a microarray experiment

sscDNAs: 

Single strand cDNA

Cq: 

Quantification cycle in RT-PCR

REST: 

Relative expression software tool

MIQE: 

Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments

AAFC: 

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Research funding support from NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada), and AAFC is acknowledged. We are grateful to Réjean Desgagnés and David Gagné, expert technicians of Dr. Laberge lab, for their kind assistance. We acknowledge Dr. Nicholas Tinker from AAFC-Ottawa for his advice for the statistical analysis of microarray data. We would like to thank Drs. Danielle Prévost and Jean Cloutier (AAFC-Quebec City) for valuable discussions on Arctic Mesorhizobium and Carole Gauvin for assistance with nodulation tests. Sincere thanks to Dr. André Laroche, Michele Frick and Carolyn Penniket (AAFC-Lethbridge, Alberta) for access to and assistance with qRT-PCR. We acknowledge Dr. Sharon R Long and Dr. Melanie Barnett from Stanford University for their effective discussions on high yield transcription reactions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate Programs in Agri-Food Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
(2)
Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada
(3)
Department of Soils and Agri-Food Engineering, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada
(4)
Soils and Crops Research Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 2 J3, Canada

References

  1. Goldstein J, Pollitt NS, Inouye M. Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(1):283–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Phadtare S, Severinov K. RNA remodeling and gene regulation by cold shock proteins. RNA Biol. 2010;7(6):788–95.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Margesin R, Miteva V. Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms. Res Microbiol. 2011;162(3):346–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lopez-Maury L, Marguerat S, Bahler J. Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(8):583–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Feller G, Gerday C. Psychrophilic enzymes: hot topics in cold adaptation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2003;1(3):200–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Siddiqui KS, Cavicchioli R. Cold-adapted enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:403–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mykytczuk NC, Foote SJ, Omelon CR, Southam G, Greer CW, Whyte LG. Bacterial growth at −15 °C; molecular insights from the permafrost bacterium Planococcus halocryophilus Or1. The ISME journal. 2013;7(6):1211-1226.Google Scholar
  8. Bakermans C, Bergholz PW, Rodrigues DF, Vishnivetskaya TA, Ayala-del-Rio HL JMT. Genomic and expression analyses of cold-adapted microorganisms. In: Miller RV, Whyte LG, editors. Polar microbiology: life in a deep freeze. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 2012. p. 126–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Shivaji S, Prakash JS. How do bacteria sense and respond to low temperature? Arch Microbiol. 2010;192(2):85–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Suzuki I, Kanesaki Y, Mikami K, Kanehisa M, Murata N. Cold-regulated genes under control of the cold sensor Hik33 in Synechocystis. Mol Microbiol. 2001;40(1):235–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Narberhaus F, Waldminghaus T, Chowdhury S. RNA thermometers. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006;30(1):3–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Trevors JT, Bej AK, Mojib N, Elsas JD, Overbeek L. Bacterial gene expression at low temperatures. Extremophiles. 2012;16(2):167–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Methe BA, Nelson KE, Deming JW, Momen B, Melamud E, Zhang X, et al. The psychrophilic lifestyle as revealed by the genome sequence of Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H through genomic and proteomic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(31):10913–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu Z, Qin L, Walker VK. Characterization and recombinant expression of a divergent ice nucleation protein from ‘Pseudomonas borealis’. Microbiology. 2009;155(Pt 4):1164–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jagannadham MV, Chowdhury C. Differential expression of membrane proteins helps Antarctic Pseudomonas syringae to acclimatize upon temperature variations. J Proteomics. 2012;75(8):2488–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jagannadham MV, Chattopadhyay MK, Subbalakshmi C, Vairamani M, Narayanan K, Rao CM, et al. Carotenoids of an Antarctic psychrotolerant bacterium, Sphingobacterium antarcticus, and a mesophilic bacterium, Sphingobacterium multivorum. Arch Microbiol. 2000;173(5–6):418–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ray MK, Kumar GS, Shivaji S. Phosphorylation of membrane proteins in response to temperature in an Antarctic Pseudomonas syringae. Microbiology. 1994;140(Pt 12):3217–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chin JP, Megaw J, Magill CL, Nowotarski K, Williams JP, Bhaganna P, et al. Solutes determine the temperature windows for microbial survival and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(17):7835–40.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Piette F, Struvay C, Feller G. The protein folding challenge in psychrophiles: facts and current issues. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(8):1924–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Piette F, D’Amico S, Struvay C, Mazzucchelli G, Renaut J, Tutino ML, et al. Proteomics of life at low temperatures: trigger factor is the primary chaperone in the Antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76(1):120–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrer M, Chernikova TN, Yakimov MM, Golyshin PN, Timmis KN. Chaperonins govern growth of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(11):1266–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Medigue C, Krin E, Pascal G, Barbe V, Bernsel A, Bertin PN, et al. Coping with cold: the genome of the versatile marine Antarctica bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125. Genome Res. 2005;15(10):1325–35.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cairrao F, Cruz A, Mori H, Arraiano CM. Cold shock induction of RNase R and its role in the maturation of the quality control mediator SsrA/tmRNA. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50(4):1349–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghobakhlou A, Laberge S, Antoun H, Wishart DS, Xia J, Krishnamurthy R, et al. Metabolomic analysis of cold acclimation of Arctic Mesorhizobium sp. strain N33. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84801.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Laguerre G, van Berkum P, Amarger N, Prévost D. Genetic diversity of rhizobial symbionts isolated from legume species within the genera Astragalus, Oxytropis, and Onobrychis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(12):4748–58.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Prévost D, Bordeleau LM, Caudry-Reznick S, Schulman HM, Antoun H. Characteristics of rhizobia isolated from three legumes indigenous to the Canadian high arctic: Astragalus alpinus, Oxytropis maydelliana, and Oxytropis arctobia. Plant Soil. 1987;98(3):313–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Cloutier J, Laberge S, Prevost D, Antoun H. Sequence and mutational analysis of the common nodBCIJ region of Rhizobium sp. (Oxytropis arctobia) strain N33, a nitrogen-fixing microsymbiont of both arctic and temperate legumes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1996;9(6):523–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cloutier J, Laberge S, Antoun H. Sequence and mutational analysis of the 6.7-kb region containing nodAFEG genes of Rhizobium sp. strain N33: evidence of DNA rearrangements. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1997;10(3):401–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Prévost D, Antoun H, Bordeleau LM. Effects of low temperatures on nitrogenase activity in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) nodulated by arctic rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1987;45(4):205–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Prévost D, Bordeleau LM, Michaud R, Lafrenière C, Waddington J, Biederbeck VO. Nitrogen fixation efficiency of cold-adapted rhizobia on sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia): laboratory and field evaluation. In: Graham PH, Sadowsky MJ, Vance CP, editors. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Netherlands: Springer; 1994. p. 171–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3(7):RESEARCH0034.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55(4):611–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. e36;30(9).Google Scholar
  34. Miron M, Woody O, Marcil A, Murie C, Sladek R, Nadon R. A methodology for global validation of microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7(1):333.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodrigues DF, Ivanova N, He Z, Huebner M, Zhou J, Tiedje JM. Architecture of thermal adaptation in an Exiguobacterium sibiricum strain isolated from 3 million year old permafrost: a genome and transcriptome approach. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:547.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Galperin MY, Nikolskaya AN, Koonin EV. Novel domains of the prokaryotic two-component signal transduction systems. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;203(1):11–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mascher T, Helmann JD, Unden G. Stimulus perception in bacterial signal-transducing histidine kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(4):910–38.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bakermans C, Nealson KH. Relationship of critical temperature to macromolecular synthesis and growth yield in Psychrobacter cryopegella. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(8):2340–5.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Giuliani S, Frank A, Corgliano D, Seifert C, Hauser L, Collart F. Environment sensing and response mediated by ABC transporters. BMC Genomics. 2011;12 Suppl 1:S8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mauchline T, Fowler J, East A, Sartor A, Zaheer R, Hosie A, et al. Mapping the Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 solute-binding protein-dependent transportome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17933–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawahara H. Cryoprotectants and ice-binding proteins. In: Margesin R, Schinner F, Marx J-C, Gerday C, editors. Psychrophiles: from biodiversity to biotechnology. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2008. p. 229–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Chattopadhyay MK. Mechanism of bacterial adaptation to low temperature. J Biosci. 2006;31(1):157–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shimoda Y, Mitsui H, Kamimatsuse H, Minamisawa K, Nishiyama E, Ohtsubo Y, et al. Construction of signature-tagged mutant library in Mesorhizobium loti as a powerful tool for functional genomics. DNA Res. 2008;15(5):297–308.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. D’Amico S, Collins T, Marx JC, Feller G, Gerday C. Psychrophilic microorganisms: challenges for life. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(4):385–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Loschi L, Brokx SJ, Hills TL, Zhang G, Bertero MG, Lovering AL, et al. Structural and biochemical identification of a novel bacterial oxidoreductase. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(48):50391–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Cartier G, Lorieux F, Allemand F, Dreyfus M, Bizebard T. Cold adaptation in DEAD-box proteins. Biochemistry. 2010;49(12):2636–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Scherer S, Neuhaus K. Life at low temperatures. Prokaryotes. 2006;2:210–62. Chapter 1.8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Berger F, Normand P, Potier P. capA, a cspA-like gene that encodes a cold acclimation protein in the psychrotrophic bacterium Arthrobacter globiformis SI55. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(18):5670–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheurwater E, Reid CW, Clarke AJ. Lytic transglycosylases: bacterial space-making autolysins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(4):586–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Bergholz PW, Bakermans C, Tiedje JM. Psychrobacter arcticus 273–4 uses resource efficiency and molecular motion adaptations for subzero temperature growth. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(7):2340–52.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Drouin P, Prevost D, Antoun H. Physiological adaptation to low temperatures of strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae associated with Lathyrus spp.(1). FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;32(2):111–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Price PB, Sowers T. Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, maintenance, and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(13):4631–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Krembs C, Deming JW. The role of exopolymers in microbial adaptation to sea ice. Psychrophiles: from Biodiversity to Biotechnology. 2008;(Pt3):247-264.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson DN, Nierhaus KH. The how and Y of cold shock. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11(11):1026–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Economou A. Bacterial preprotein translocase: mechanism and conformational dynamics of a processive enzyme. Mol Microbiol. 1998;27(3):511–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Price PB. Low-temperature limits of microbial growth and metabolism. In: Miller RV, Whyte LG, editors. Polar microbiology: life in a deep freeze. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2012. p. 243–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Gage DJ. Infection and invasion of roots by symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing Rhizobia during nodulation of temperate legumes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(2):280–300.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kawaharada Y, Eda S, Minamisawa K, Mitsui H. A Mesorhizobium loti mutant with reduced glucan content shows defective invasion of its host plant Lotus japonicus. Microbiology. 2007;153(Pt 12):3983–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Prévost D, Bromfield ESP. Effect of low root temperature on symbiotic nitrogen fixation and competitive nodulation of Onobrychis viciifolia (sainfoin) by strains of arctic and temperate rhizobia. Biol Fertil Soils. 1991;12(3):161–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Prévost D, Drouin P, Laberge S, Bertrand A, Cloutier J, Lévesque G. Cold-adapted rhizobia for nitrogen fixation in temperate regions. Can J Bot. 2003;81(12):1153–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Vincent JM. A manual for the practical study of root nodule bacteria. IBP Handbook No 15. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1970. p. 164.Google Scholar
  62. Kneen BE, Larue TA. Congo Red absorption by Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45(1):340–2.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blocker H, Emde M, Bottger EC. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(19):7843–53.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kingston RE. Preparation and analysis of RNA. In: Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012;(98)4.0:4.0.1–4.0.2. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471142727.mb0908s36/abstract
  65. Laberge S, Gagnon Y, Bordeleau LM, Lapointe J. Cloning and sequencing of the gltX gene, encoding the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase of Rhizobium meliloti A2. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(7):3926–32.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Barnett MJ, Toman CJ, Fisher RF, Long SR. A dual-genome Symbiosis Chip for coordinate study of signal exchange and development in a prokaryote-host interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(47):16636–41.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. The Gene Expression Omnibus. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/].
  68. Smyth GK, Speed T. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods (San Diego, Calif). 2003;31(4):265–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. e15;30(4).Google Scholar
  70. Allison D, Cui X, Page G, Sabripour M. Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:55–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
  72. Riva A, Carpentier AS, Torresani B, Henaut A. Comments on selected fundamental aspects of microarray analysis. Comput Biol Chem. 2005;29(5):319–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 2001;29(4):365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JA. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W71–74.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protocols. 2008;3(6):1101–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Binns D, Dimmer E, Huntley R, Barrell D, O’Donovan C, Apweiler R. QuickGO: a web-based tool for Gene Ontology searching. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(22):3045–6.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tatusov R, Koonin E, Lipman D. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tatusov RL, Natale DA, Garkavtsev IV, Tatusova TA, Shankavaram UT, Rao BS, et al. The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(1):22–8.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ghobakhlou et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement