Open Access

Genes related to mitochondrial functions are differentially expressed in phosphine-resistant and -susceptible Tribolium castaneum

  • Brenda Oppert1Email author,
  • Raul N. C. Guedes2,
  • Michael J. Aikins3,
  • Lindsey Perkin1,
  • Zhaorigetu Chen3,
  • Thomas W. Phillips3,
  • Kun Yan Zhu3,
  • George P. Opit4,
  • Kelly Hoon5, 6,
  • Yongming Sun5,
  • Gavin Meredith5, 7,
  • Kelli Bramlett5,
  • Natalie Supunpong Hernandez5,
  • Brian Sanderson5,
  • Madison W. Taylor5,
  • Dalia Dhingra5,
  • Brandon Blakey5,
  • Marcé Lorenzen8,
  • Folukemi Adedipe8 and
  • Frank Arthur1
BMC Genomics201516:968

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2121-0

Received: 21 July 2015

Accepted: 21 October 2015

Published: 18 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Phosphine is a valuable fumigant to control pest populations in stored grains and grain products. However, recent studies indicate a substantial increase in phosphine resistance in stored product pests worldwide.

Results

To understand the molecular bases of phosphine resistance in insects, we used RNA-Seq to compare gene expression in phosphine-resistant and susceptible laboratory populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Each population was evaluated as either phosphine-exposed or no phosphine (untreated controls) in triplicate biological replicates (12 samples total). Pairwise analysis indicated there were eight genes differentially expressed between susceptible and resistant insects not exposed to phosphine (i.e., basal expression) or those exposed to phopshine (>8-fold expression and 90 % C.I.). However, 214 genes were differentially expressed among all four treatment groups at a statistically significant level (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Increased expression of 44 cytochrome P450 genes was found in resistant vs. susceptible insects, and phosphine exposure resulted in additional increases of 21 of these genes, five of which were significant among all treatment groups (p < 0.05). Expression of two genes encoding anti-diruetic peptide was 2- to 8-fold reduced in phosphine-resistant insects, and when exposed to phosphine, expression was further reduced 36- to 500-fold compared to susceptible. Phosphine-resistant insects also displayed differential expression of cuticle, carbohydrate, protease, transporter, and many mitochondrial genes, among others. Gene ontology terms associated with mitochondrial functions (oxidation biological processes, monooxygenase and catalytic molecular functions, and iron, heme, and tetrapyyrole binding) were enriched in the significantly differentially expressed dataset. Sequence polymorphism was found in transcripts encoding a known phosphine resistance gene, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase, in both susceptible and resistant insects. Phosphine-resistant adults also were resistant to knockdown by the pyrethroid deltamethrin, likely due to the increased cytochrome P450 expression.

Conclusions

Overall, genes associated with the mitochondria were differentially expressed in resistant insects, and these differences may contribute to a reduction in overall metabolism and energy production and/or compensation in resistant insects. These data provide the first gene expression data on the response of phosphine-resistant and -susceptible insects to phosphine exposure, and demonstrate that RNA-Seq is a valuable tool to examine differences in insects that respond differentially to environmental stimuli.

Keywords

Anti-diuretic peptide Cytochrome P450 Deltamethrin Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase Fumigants Insecticide resistance Gene expression Phosphine resistance Red flour beetle RNA-Seq Stored product pests Tribolium castaneum

Background

Phosphine is used worldwide as a fumigant to control insect populations in commodities such as stored grains and grain products. Phosphine kills insects rapidly at a relatively low cost, leaving minimal residues on treated products. The continued use of phosphine is of critical importance due to the regulated phase-out of the ozone-depleting fumigant methyl bromide. Phosphine is toxic to all animals, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [1] has established guidelines with recommended times and doses for treatment of stored product pests, depending on environmental conditions. Phosphine is a strong reducing agent, and biological redox systems, particularly the mitochondrial electron transport chain, are likely targets in insects [2]. Phosphine is not absorbed (i.e., not toxic) under anoxic conditions [3], and carbon dioxide can potentiate its toxicity [4], which implies that phosphine targets respiration in insects.

Most bulk grain in the United States is fumigated with phosphine because it is more economical than sampling and monitoring [5]. Therefore, selection pressure for resistance to phosphine is strong in stored product pests. Recent studies indicated a substantial increase in phosphine resistance over the past 21 years in major stored-wheat pests in the United States, with levels of resistance approaching those reported for stored-grain pest species in other countries [6, 7].

The first report of phosphine resistance in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, was more than 40 years ago [8]. In that study, it was demonstrated that 10-fold resistance to phosphine could be selected in six generations from a population of T. castaneum. Other studies have suggested that insects (including T. castaneum) with low carbon dioxide production display higher resistance to phosphine, suggesting that lower respiration rates reduce fumigant uptake in resistant insects [9]. A major phosphine resistance gene, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD), was found to be mutated in phosphine-resistant T. castaneum and another stored product beetle, the lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica), as well as phosphine-resistant nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans [10]. DLD is a mitochondrial homodimer enzyme and participates in a number of key energy complexes, and thus is highly conserved among organisms.

In this study, we compared a phosphine-resistant and -susceptible population of T. castaneum, exposed or not to phosphine, by the differential transcript expression method RNA-Seq, using the sequenced genome of T. castaneum to facilitate data analysis. Phosphine-resistant insects also were evaluated for resistance to another insecticide, deltamethrin. We found many statistically-significant differences in gene expression in resistant insects that suggest major changes in the mitochondria. The data indicate that RNA-Seq can be used to identify differential expression patterns in insecticide resistant insects associated with biological mechanisms, as well as individual variation in potential resistance genes within a population.

Results

RNA-Seq analysis

To examine differential gene expression associated with phosphine-resistance in T. castaneum, we compared expression levels in a phosphine-resistant population from Brazil, reported to have 164-fold resistance to phosphine and a lower respiration rate than susceptible insects [9]. Interestingly, we found that resistance to phosphine in the Brazilian strain had increased nearly 3-fold (to 475-fold) since the previous bioassays were performed (Additional file 1), possibly due to a genetic bottleneck during subculturing for this study. RNA-Seq was used to compare gene expression in this phosphine-resistant strain and a laboratory strain that was susceptible to phosphine, before and after exposure to sublethal phosphine doses/exposure times (for the susceptible insects, the dose was 0.65 ppm for 8 h; for the resistant insects, the dose was 200 ppm for 20 h).

Pairwise analysis was used to construct scatter plots demonstrating the relative expression of genes in untreated susceptible and resistant T. castaneum adults (Additional file 2A) and phosphine-treated susceptible and resistant adults (Additional file 2B). Gene expression was also compared in phosphine-treated and untreated resistant insects (Additional file 2C), and phosphine-treated and untreated susceptible insects (Additional file 2D). Plots of relative transcript expression were linear (R2 = 0.95 to 0.97), and included genes that were statistically significant in the pairwise analysis (>90 % C.I.), although many were below the cutoff threshold of RPKM < 1 (log2). Differences greater than 8-fold were indicated by white dots in the scatter graphs.

In the comparison of resistant to susceptible insects not exposed to phosphine (i.e. basal gene expression, >90 % C.I.), a gene encoding a hypothetical protein was significantly increased in expression (2,630-fold) in resistant compared to susceptible insects (Table 1). Increased expression also was associated with genes encoding cytochrome P450 (CYP) 9Ad1 (8.84-fold). A gene encoding a glycine-rich protein was decreased in resistant insects 15.6-fold compared to susceptible insects.
Table 1

Pairwise comparison of significantly (C.I.>90%) differential expression in transcripts from susceptible unexposed compared to resistant unexposed (SuxpRuxp) and susceptible exposed compared to resistant exposed (SexpRexp), providing relative fold expression for all (RuxpRexp, SuxpSexp, SuxpRuxp, SexpRexp) on the left and RPKM values (log2) on the right

Gene

Predicted Function

RuxpRexp

SuxpSexp

SuxpRuxp

SexpRexp

P value

ResExp RPKM

ResUxp RPKM

SuscExp RPKM

SuscUxp RPKM

LOC103314140

hypothetical protein

1.282

4.046

2628.113

833.086

0.001

4.016

3.657

-5.686

-7.702

LOC662432

cyt P450 9AD1

1.026

1.183

8.838

7.659

0.000

8.961

8.925

6.024

5.781

LOC655196

glycine-rich protein

1.224

0.772

0.064

0.102

0.001

0.466

0.174

3.759

4.132

LOC664471

cyt P450 6a14

0.772

0.685

45.620

51.415

0.001

6.162

6.534

0.478

1.023

LOC657187

cyt P450 346B1

1.639

0.816

4.928

9.899

0.003

4.899

4.186

1.591

1.885

LOC103314240

uncharacterized

0.611

0.816

0.064

0.037

0.010

-0.658

0.053

4.096

4.010

LOC661804

pox neuro

1.726

0.697

0.014

0.034

0.086

-2.673

-3.460

2.189

2.711

LOC103313692

ADFb like protein

0.288

1.281

0.127

0.028

0.001

-0.870

0.927

4.262

3.906

Row space separates genes that were significant in the SuxpRuxp (above) and SexpRexp (below) comparisons

When resistant and susceptible insects were exposed to sublethal doses of phosphine, two additional CYP genes (CYP6a14 and 346B-1) were significantly increased in expression in resistant insects compared to susceptible (51.4- and 9.89-fold, respectively; Table 1). Decreased expression in phosphine-exposed resistant insects was found in genes encoding an uncharacterized protein, pox-neuro, and anti-diruetic peptide (ADF; 27.0- to 35.7-fold).

In the comparisons of phosphine-exposed/not exposed for either resistant or susceptible insects, while there were significant differences in gene expression, all RPKM values were less than 1.0 (data not shown).

ANOVA of differences in gene expression among all four treatment groups yielded 214 genes that were significant in the differentially-expressed (DE) dataset (p < 0.05; Additional file 3: Table S1). Overall, there were a number of CYP and other genes involved in mitochondrial functions, as well as those related to carbohydrate, protease, and cuticle. In the following paragraphs, we examined more closely the most up- and down-regulated genes and possible correlations to responses to phosphine.

Unfortunately, the most highly upregulated gene among all groups in the DE dataset was the uncharacterized protein (LOC103314140) found in the pairwise analysis (Additional file 3: Table S1); this gene was 2,600-fold increased in resistant compared to susceptible insects but decreased to 833-fold when exposed to phosphine, and contained a motif similar to DUF753 Transglycosylase (data not shown). A gene encoding an alanine and glycine-rich protein was up-regulated mostly in phosphine-exposed resistant insects; these proteins are found in mammals and plants but their function is unknown. There were twelve significantly up-regulated CYP genes in phosphine-resistant insects, and phosphine exposure resulted in further increases in the expression of nine CYP genes (CYP genes will be discussed in a separate section below). Several genes encoding UGT were significantly up-regulated in resistant insects, although one encoding UGT-2B7 had low RPKM values (data not shown). UGTs serve a major role in the conjugation and subsequent elimination of potentially toxic xenobiotics and endogenous compounds, and UGT-2B7 is the isoform most responsible for glucuronidation of clinical drugs [11]. UGT enzymes are found in a number of metabolic pathways in T. castaneum, including cytochrome P450 systems involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Some genes encoding enzymes active in mitochondria were increased in expression in resistant insects, and further increased when insects were exposed to phosphine, including one encoding peroxiredoxin-6, which protects against mitochondrial dysfunction in mice [12], and dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase (DLST) and associated enzyme dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, another name for the major phosphine resistance gene DLD [10]. Up-regulated genes in resistant insects also were associated with the cuticle, including one encoding a gene similar to keratin-associated protein 19-3-like, which in arthropods promotes immobilization of invading microbes at injury sites [13]. Genes encoding solute transporters were both up- and down-regulated in resistant insects (Additional file 3: Table S1 and Additional file 4: Table S2).

Several severely down-regulated genes in resistant insects encoded ADFs, and while phosphine exposure increased ADF expression in susceptible insects, expression was decreased further in resistant insects, suggesting increased water secretion (Additional file 4: Table S2). Another gene, venom allergen 3, was decreased in resistant insects regardless of phosphine exposure. The down-regulated group also included genes encoding proteins that function in cuticle, sugar transport, and mitochondria. A cathepsin B was downregulated in resistant insects, and this gene is expressed at low levels throughout the life stages of T. castaneum [14] and is likely a lysosomal enzyme that may activate caspase during mitochondrial stress. A gene encoding enolase, an enzyme involved in the penultimate step of glycolysis, was severely down-regulated in resistant insects. There were a number of genes with uncharacterized functions and without chromosome placement in the latest genome assembly (ie, “un” indicating unplaced scaffold) in the down-regulated group.

Enrichment analysis indicated that GO terms associated with metabolism (GO:0044710, Biological Process—BP) were significantly enriched in the DE dataset (FDR = 6.2e−6; Table 2 ). Others that suggest association with mitochondrial functions, such as oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114, BP), and oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016491 and GO:0016705, Molecular Function—MF), were significantly enriched in the DE dataset (FDR ≤ 1.5e−5). In conjunction with oxidation/reduction reactions, genes encoding proteins that have iron binding (GO:005506, MF, FDR = 4.0e−7), heme binding (GO:0020037, MF, FDR = 6.2e−6), and tetrapyrrole binding (GO:0046906, MF, FDR = 6.2e−6) properties also were enriched. As noted earlier, CYP genes were included in the enriched monooxygenase activity (GO:0004497, MF, FDR = 6.2e−6) category. Genes encoding enzymes were also enriched (catalytic activity, MF, FDR = 5.3e−3). All GO terms were over-represented in the dataset, and support the differential expression of genes involved in metabolic and respiration functions among resistant and susceptible insects.
Table 2

Results of enrichment analysis (Blast2GO) of GO terms in the dataset of significantly DE genes (Additional file 4: Table S2 and Additional file 5: Table S1)

GO-ID

Term

Categorya

FDRb

P-Value

#Test

#Ref

#notAnnot Test

#notAnnot Ref

GO:0005506

iron ion binding

F

3.99E-07

9.40E-11

17

153

115

9554

GO:0055114

oxidation-reduction process

P

1.09E-06

6.16E-10

31

636

101

9071

GO:0016491

oxidoreductase activity

F

1.09E-06

7.68E-10

31

642

101

9065

GO:0004497

monooxygenase activity

F

6.16E-06

5.87E-09

13

106

119

9601

GO:0020037

heme binding

F

6.16E-06

8.61E-09

15

157

117

9550

GO:0046906

tetrapyrrole binding

F

6.16E-06

9.33E-09

15

158

117

9549

GO:0044710

single-organism metabolic process

P

6.16E-06

1.02E-08

52

1747

80

7960

GO:0016705

oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation

F

    

117

9534

 

or reduction of molecular oxygen

 

1.53E-05

2.88E-08

15

173

  

GO:0003824

catalytic activity

F

5.33E-03

1.13E-05

75

3644

57

6063

aF: Molecular Function); P: Biological Process

b[26]

Dihydrolipoamide Dehydrogenase (DLD) as a resistance gene

Since DLD is a phosphine resistance gene in T. castaneum [10] and was increased in expression in resistant insects, we used RNASeq data to examine sequences for DLD from phosphine-susceptible and -resistant insects. There was relatively good coverage of reads aligning to DLD from QTC4 (a susceptible T. castaneum population, accession JX434604) in all four treatment groups (Additional file 5), although depth of coverage was better in transcripts from the resistant insects in some regions. There have been multiple mutations noted in DLD genes in phosphine-resistant insects and nematodes, but the only mutation that has been identified in a phosphine-resistant population of T. castaneum was G131S [10]. However, we did not find this mutation in predicted DLD sequences from susceptible or resistant insects, either exposed or not to phosphine (Fig. 1). We did find a difference in the predicted signal peptide region, R28G, in all sequences from susceptible insects compared to that of T. castaneum strain QTC4, whether they were exposed to phosphine or not; this may represent a marker for this population (Fig. 1a). In the phosphine-resistant population, insects unexposed or exposed to phosphine had the polymorphism P45S in the N-terminal FAD binding region of DLD, found in 315/455 (69.2 %) transcripts from the unexposed insects, and 352/546 (64.5 %) transcripts from the phosphine-exposed insects (Fig. 1b). It is possible that this mutation is critical to survival of phosphine exposure, as mutations in this region were also found in other phosphine-resistant insects and nematodes [10]. For the remainder of the alignment, sequences from susceptible-exposed insects were orthologous to that of QTC4 (Additional file 6). SNPs and indels presented uncertainty in alignments of the C-terminal region from transcripts of the susceptible unexposed, and resistant exposed/unexposed (Additional file 7), so we were unable to detail mutations in other regions that may have affected dimerization or NADH binding. We noted a number of indels that resulted in premature stop codons near the beginning of the NADH binding site in transcripts from resistant insects, either exposed or not to phosphine. We also found a few regions in the QTC4 DLD sequence that were different in the DLD transcripts from resistant insects that may be useful in designing a diagnostic assay based on restriction digest analysis for resistance in field populations of T. castaneum (shaded sequences, Additional file 6).
Fig. 1

Blastx of putative N-terminal DLD consensus sequences predicted from transcripts from adult T. castaneum strains exposed or not to phosphine, with sequences from a the phosphine-susceptible strain and b phosphine-resistant strain; all were “Queries” to QTC4 “Subject” (gi|399108166|gb|AFP20530.1|). Differences between the phosphine-susceptible, - resistant, and QTC4 sequences are boxed. All letters are standard amino acid abbreviations, except X = unknown (but was a mixture of serine and proline residues). The asterisk denotes the G131S phosphine-resistance mutation described in [10]

Increased CYP gene expression

CYPs play important roles in the detoxification of xenobiotics, function as monooxygenases, and effectively oxidize organic substrates. Since phosphine is a strong reducing agent, CYPs may act antagonistically in biological systems. CYPs can participate as terminal oxidases in electron transport chains, downstream of DLD in the citric acid cycle. Overall, the expression of 44 genes encoding CYP genes was increased in phosphine-resistant compared to - susceptible T. castaneum (data not shown), with 14 differentially expressed more than 2-fold, and five that were significantly increased (p < 0.05) under phosphine exposure (Fig. 2). These genes were from clans 3, 4, and mitochondrial, and many were CYP6 genes, located in a gene expansion group on chromosome 4 in T. castaneum, and CYP346, located in another gene expansion group on chromosome 5 (data not shown). CYP6 orthologs have been linked to insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae (mosquito [15, 16]), Myzus persicae (aphid [17]), and D. melanogaster (fly [18]), among other insects.
Fig. 2

Differential expression of genes (>2-fold) encoding CYPs among all four treatment group comparisons (susceptible vs. resistant phosphine-exposed—SexpRexp; susceptible vs. resistant not exposed—SuxpRuxp; susceptible not exposed vs. phosphine-exposed—SuxpSexp; resistant not exposed vs. phosphine-exposed—RuxpRexp), using F-test (ANOVA, FDR [26]) with those that are significant (p < 0.05) marked with an asterisk

Effect of deltamethrin on different T. castaneum populations

Resistance to the contact pyrethroid insecticide deltamethrin in T. castaneum strain QTC279 was linked to increased CYP expression [19, 20]. Because of the increase in CYP transcripts in the Brazilian phosphine-resistant strain, we predicted that this strain also would be resistant to deltamethrin, especially since this pyrethroid historically has been used heavily in stored grains in Brazil. Therefore, we exposed adults of QTC279 and the phosphine-susceptible and Brazilian phosphine-resistant populations to concrete surfaces treated with deltamethrin at the equivalent of the highest label rate 0.156 mg AI/cm2 (Fig. 3). For the first three hours, adults from the Brazilian phosphine-resistant population were able to withstand the pyrethroid exposure, exhibiting a survival profile intermediate between the susceptible strains and the pyrethroid-resistant QTC279. However, after extended exposure (ca. 19 h), the Brazilian insects were knocked-down and immoblized, whereas the QTC279 adults were upright and running in the exposure arena. The susceptible strain was not able to withstand 2 h deltamethrin exposure, reaching 100 % mortality within this period. The deltamethrin formulation currently used in Brazil is synergized with PBO to avoid complications of insecticide resistance by increased CYP expression. The data suggest that deltamethrin exposure may have contributed to the retention of resistance genes in this phosphine-resistant population.
Fig. 3

Survival of T. castaneum adults exposed to 0.156 AI/cm2 deltamethrin on concrete surfaces. T. castaneum strains included phosphine-susceptible (TcPhosSusc), phosphine-resistant (TcPhosRes), or QTC-279. The survival curves were significantly different by Cox regression analysis (χ 2 = 97.23, df = 2, p < 0.001) and the median survival time (LT50; and respective 95 % fiducial limits) was estimated and indicated for the strains reaching at least 50 % mortality within the exposure period (i.e., 24 hs). The symbols indicate the observed mean values of five replicates (± S.E.)

Discussion

Phosphine resistance threatens the economical control of storage pests worldwide. It is critical to understand the molecular differences in resistant insect populations so that we can develop effective resistance management strategies. This study represents the first to examine phosphine resistance by gene expression analysis. Unfortunately, many insect genes still have undiscovered functions, including some identified in this study as associated with phosphine exposure or resistance. While this limits our interpretation of the results, associations of these genes with phosphine response can help to further delineate their function in future studies.

Regardless, we demonstrated significant changes in the expression of genes in a Brazilian phosphine-resistant population of T. castaneum, either exposed or not to phosphine, compared to a phosphine-susceptible population. Most notably, genes encoding CYPs were increased and those encoding anti-diuretics peptides were decreased substantially in the phosphine resistant population, and in most cases the difference was enhanced with phosphine exposure. In addition, many genes associated with mitochondrial functions were differentially expressed, correlated with the likely mode of action of phosphine in insects.

While CYPs are involved in many cases of insecticide resistance, they have not been associated with phosphine resistance. Cyp6BQ9, located on the same linkage group as the most highly upregulated CYP6A1-like in our study (Fig. 2, but also called CYPBQ7, Additional file 3), is expressed in the adult brain of T. castaneum and is responsible for deltamethrin resistance in T. castaneum strain QTC279 [20]. Phosphine-stimulated expression of CYP genes has not been documented in other insects, and the functional relevance at this point can only be speculated. Increased CYP activity in phosphine environments may be contributing to the detoxification of secondary metabolites due to phosphine exposure (indirect detoxification), or may be a result of uncoupling oxidase and monooxygenase reactions under increased levels of activated oxygen species.

Several genes associated with anti-diuresis functions (ADFs) were down-regulated in phosphine-resistant insects. ADF proteins are anti-diuretic factors involved in osmoregulation; in beetles one ADF is extremely potent at nanomolar concentrations and severely inhibits Malphigian tubule secretion [21]. The data suggest that resistant insects have significantly decreased expression of anti-diuretic peptides compared to susceptible insects, especially when under phosphine stress. Decreased expression of ADFs when resistant insects are exposed to phosphine suggests that insects are decreasing water absorption. In fact, although controversial, forced diuresis has been indicated in mammals in response to complications associated with phosphine intoxication. It is intriguing to speculate that a similar process may be occurring in phosphine-resistant insects.

Based on current information, phosphine likely directly affects the mitochondria and respiration in insects, and genes associated with the mitochondria were both increased and decreased in expression in phosphine-resistant insects. The resistant insect strain in this study has demonstrated a lower respiration rate based on reduced CO2 production [7]. Reduced energy metabolism was supported by the fact that the gene encoding enolase, the last enzyme in glycolysis, was severely repressed in resistant insects. The increased expression of UGT, CYPs, and peroxiredoxin-6 in phosphine-exposed resistant insects may be responding to phosphine damage to the mitochondria through the elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The down-regulation of lysosomal cathepsin B in resistant insects may be reducing an apoptotic response to mitochondrial damage through caspases.

DLST binds tightly to DLD in the mitochondria, and both were increased in resistant insects, but slightly decreased in response to phosphine. Examination of transcripts encoding DLD from T. castaneum individuals suggested that SNPs and/or indels may contribute to mutations that result in phosphine resistance, with the P45S mutation in the N-terminal FAD binding region likely linked to phosphine resistance in T. castaneum. DLD is thus far the only major phosphine resistance gene reported in insects [10], but it is unknown whether mutations can result in increased expression of the gene and/or other genes in resistant insects, such as observed in this study. Good coverage of the DLD sequences from transcripts in all four treatment groups suggested additional SNPs that could be useful in diagnostic assays.

Consistent with the increase in CYP expression in the resistant insects, the Brazilian phosphine-resistant insects were also resistant to deltamethrin. Therefore, caution is warranted in modifying resistance management strategies to control insects in this region. Importantly, these data suggest that T. castaneum populations likely have acquired multiple resistance genes in response to field applications of phosphine and pyrethroid insecticide treatments in the past.

Conclusions

The use of RNA-Seq is an effective tool to evaluate differences in gene expression in different populations. We have demonstrated that the technique provided statistically significant data regarding differences of gene expression in phosphine-resistant and -susceptible populations of T. castaneum. The data provides new information on the biological response of insects to phosphine, and offer hints toward the functional relevance of these genes in phosphine resistance. In addition to expression data, we were able to more fully characterize a gene that has been associated with resistance to phosphine in different organisms.

Methods

Insect strains

The phosphine-susceptible population of T. castaneum for this study was a laboratory colony (CGAHR, Manhattan, KS) used in previous gene expression studies [22, 23]. Exposure of adults to 1.35 ppm phosphine for 72 h at 27 °C resulted in approximately 50 % mortality (LC50, or “median lethal concentration”) in a similar wild-type laboratory population [7]. The resistant population was collected in May, 2005, from maize stored in a metallic bin in Bom Despacho County, Minas Gerais (Brazil; 19° 44' 09" S, 45° 15' 07" W) [9]. Probit analysis indicated that the LC50 and LC99 for phosphine exposure in the Brazilian resistant population are 309 ppm and 775 ppm, respectively (Additional file 1) [24]. The pyrethroid-resistant strain of T. castaneum, QTC279, was from the stock Tribolium cultures at CGAHR and originated from the state of Queensland in Australia, and was previously characterized as resistant to deltamethrin due to increased cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity [19].

Insecticide treatments

The outline for phosphine treatment for the RNA-Seq experiment is found in Additional file 8. For phosphine exposure, 50 adults (approximately 2 weeks post emergence) were exposed to sublethal phosphine doses (based on dose response curves, 0.65 ppm for susceptible and 200 ppm for resistant insects) in sealed gas-tight 3.8 L glass jars and were incubated for 8 or 20 h, respectively, at 25 °C. Equivalent groups of susceptible and resistant adults were treated similarly, but without phosphine exposure. There were triplicate biological replicates for each treatment. Insects were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C in RNA grinding buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).

For deltamethrin treatment, concrete exposure arenas were created by mixing a driveway patching material (Rockkite®, Hartline Products, Co., Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) with water to create a liquid slurry, and filling the bottom portion of a plastic Petri dish (62 cm2 area) to a depth of about 1.25 cm. The arenas were allowed to dry for several days on a laboratory counter. Deltamethrin (Centynal EC®, 50 mg active ingredient [AI]/ml, Central Life Sciences, Shaumberg, IL, USA) was used at the maximum label rate (42.8 ml in 3,784 ml water to cover 94 m2). Six individual replicate solutions were formulated in 50 mL volumetric flasks to spray the arenas with the spray rate of 0.3 formulated spray per the 62 cm2 area of the arena, which is equivalent to the volumetric spray rate from the label (final deposition of 0.156 AI/cm2). An artists' air-brush (Badger Air-Brush Company, Franklin Park, IL, USA) was used to spray each arena. There were five replicates each for the phosphine-susceptible and -resistant populations, and also five replicates of T. castaneum QTC279. The arenas were sprayed and allowed to dry overnight, and the next day ten adults from each of the three colonies described above were placed on each arena. The arenas were held on a laboratory counter at room temperature, and beetles were evaluated for knockdown (number of beetles on their dorsal side and unable to flip over) every 15 min for 3 h, and at 19, 20, and 24 h post-exposure. The results obtained were subjected to survival analysis using Cox regression allowing comparison among strains.

High-throughput sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from treatment groups of adult T. castaneum using the RNeasy plus mini kit with on-column DNase treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and mRNA was extracted from 5 μg total RNA using Dynabeads® mRNA DIRECT™ Micro Kit. RNA integrity of total RNA, mRNA, and cDNA was validated by TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA USA), and quantitation was with a nanophotometer (Implen, Westlake Village, CA USA). Libraries were prepared with the Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 and were individually barcoded (Ion Xpress™ RNA-Seq Barcode 1–16 Kit, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Templates were prepared (Ion PITM™ Template OT2 200 Kit) and sequenced (Ion PITM™ Sequencing 200 Kit) on Ion Proton™ PITM Chips on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY). Each chip was run with 4 barcoded samples. The distribution of reads was relatively equal among samples (Additional file 9). Reads were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive, accession SRP064827.

Bioinformatic analyses

Data were trimmed by Basecaller (Torrent Suite Software, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reads were analyzed for differential expression among treatments by mapping reads from each treatment group to Tcas3 (June 6, 2014), using ArrayStar (DNAStar) and normalized by Reads Per Kilobase of template per Million mapped reads (RPKM [25]); additional data on the filtering of reads during the analysis is in Additional file 9. Statistical significance was determined by either pairwise (Student t-test) or all groups (F-test ANOVA) using FDR [26]. Restriction enzyme sites were located in QTC4 (gi|399108165|gb|JX434604.1) using NEBcutter2 [27]. Alignments were made with CLUSTAL Omega (ver. 1.2.0 [28]). A custom annotation file for the T. castaneum genome was made in Blast2GO (Valencia, Spain), and enrichment analysis was by Fisher’s Exact Test (Blast2GO).

Abbreviations

CYP: 

Cytochrome P450

ADF: 

Anti-diruetic peptide

DE: 

Differentially-expressed

DLD: 

Dihydrolipoamide or dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase

DLST: 

Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase

FAO: 

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

UGT: 

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Tom Morgan for excellent technical support. This manuscript is contribution no. 14-082-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station (KAES), Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Partial financial support for MJA, TWP, and ZC came from the KAES and the Australian Plant Biosecurity-Cooperative Research Center. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Universities. All associated U.S. institutions are equal opportunity providers and employers.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
USDA Agricultural Research Service, Center for Grain and Animal Health Research
(2)
Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Vicosa
(3)
Department of Entomology, Kansas State University
(4)
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University
(5)
LifeTechnologies
(6)
Present address: Illumina Inc.
(7)
Present address: Nanostring Technologies
(8)
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University

References

  1. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/x5042e/x5042e0a.htm. Access date November 12, 2015
  2. Chaudhry MQ. A review of the mechanisms involved in the action of phosphine as an insecticide and phosphine resistance in stored-product insects. Pestic Sci. 1997;49:213–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond EJ, Robinson JR, Buckland CT. The toxic action of phosphine. Absorption and symptoms of poisoning in insects. J Stored Prod Res. 1969;5:289–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kashi KP, Bond EJ. The toxic action of phosphine: role of carbon dioxide on the toxicity of phosphine to Sitophilus qranarius (L.) and Tribolium confusum Du Yal. J Stored Prod Res. 1975;11:9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur F. Chemical control in stored products. In: Proceedings of the IOBC-WPRS Working Group IPSP, Bordeaux, France; July 1–5. 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Pimentel MAG, Faroni LRD’A, da Silva FH, Batista MD, Guedes RNC. Spread of phosphine resistance among Brazilian populations of three species of stored product insects. Neotrop Entomol. 2010;39:101–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Opit GP, Phillips TW, Aikins MJ, Hasan MM. Phosphine resistance in Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica from stored wheat in Oklahoma. J Econ Entomol. 2012;105:1107–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Winks, RG 1974. Fumigant resistance studies. CSIRO Div. Ent. A. Rep. 1974–74, 38–39.Google Scholar
  9. Pimentel MAG, Faroni LRD’A, Tótola MR, Guedes RNC. Phosphine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored-product insects. Pest Manag Sci. 2007;63:876–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlipalius DI, Valmas N, Tuck AG, Jagadeesan R, Ma L, Kaur R, et al. A core metabolic enzyme mediates resistance to phosphine gas. Science. 2012;338:807–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wlliams JA, Hyland R, Jones BC, Smith DA, Hurst S, Goosen TC, et al. Drug-drug interactions for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrates: a pharmacokinetic explanation for typically observed low exposure (AUCi/AUC) ratios. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32:1201–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Eismann T, Huber N, Shin T, Kuboki S, Galloway E, Wyder M, et al. Peroxiredoxin-6 protects against mitochondrial dysfunction and liver injury during ischemia-reperfusion in mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296:G266–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsuda Y, Osaki T, Hashii T, Koshiba T, Kawabata S. A cysteine-rich protein from an arthropod stabilizes clotting mesh and immobilizes bacteria at injury sites. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:33545–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Perkin LC, Elpidina EN, Oppert B. Expression patterns of cysteine peptidase genes across the Tribolium castaneum life cycle provide clues to biological function. Peer J. 2016;4:e1581.Google Scholar
  15. Nikou D, Ranson H, Hemingway J. An adult-specific CYP6 P450 gene is overexpressed in a pyrethroid-resistant strain of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. Gene. 2003;318:91–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiu TL, Wen Z, Rupasinghe SG, Schuler MA. Comparative molecular modeling of Anopheles gambiae CYP6Z1, a mosquito P450 capable of metabolizing DDT. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:8855–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Bass C, Puinean AM, Andrews M, Cutler P, Daniels M, Elias J, et al. Mutation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor b subunit is associated with resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in the aphid Myzus persicae. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12:51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Daborn PJ, Yen JL, Bogwitz MR, Le Goff G, Feil E, Jeffers S, et al. A single P450 allele associated with insecticide resistance in Drosophila. Science. 2002;297:2253–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stuart JJ, Ray S, Harrington BJ, Neal JL, Beeman RW. Genetic mapping of a major locus controlling pyrethroid resistance in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Econ Entomol. 1998;91:1232–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhu F, Parthasarathy R, Bai H, Woithe K, Kaussmann M, Nauen R, et al. A brain-specific cytochrome P450 responsible for the majority of deltamethrin resistance in the QTC279 strain of Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:8557–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Eigenheer RA, Nicolson SW, Schegg KM, Hull JJ, Schooley DA. Identification of a potent antidiuretic factor acting on beetle Malpighian tubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:84–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris KM, Hiromasa Y, Tomich JM, Oppert C, Elpidina EN, Vinokurov K, et al. Tribolium castaneum larval gut transcriptome and proteome: A resource for the study of the coleopteran gut. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:3889–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Oppert B, Elpidina EN, Toutges M, Mazumdar-Leighton S. Microarray analysis reveals strategies of Tribolium castaneum larvae to compensate for cysteine and serine protease inhibitors. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2010;5D:280–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Finney DJ. Probit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  25. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat Methods. 2008;5:621–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57B:289–300.Google Scholar
  27. Vincze T, Posfai J, Roberts RJ. NEBcutter: a program to cleave DNA with restriction enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3688–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen DG, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oppert et al. 2016