Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Transcriptomes of post-mitotic neurons identify the usage of alternative pathways during adult and embryonic neuronal differentiation

BMC Genomics201516:1100

  • Received: 19 August 2015
  • Accepted: 16 November 2015
  • Published:



Understanding the mechanisms by which neurons are generated and specified, and how they integrate into functional circuits is key to being able to treat disorders of the nervous system and acute brain trauma. Much of what we know about neuronal differentiation has been studied in developing embryos, but differentiation steps may be very different during adult neurogenesis. For this reason, we compared the transcriptomes of newly differentiated neurons in zebrafish embryos and adults.


Using a 4tU RNA labeling method, we isolated and sequenced mRNA specifically from cells of one day old embryos and adults expressing the transgene HA-uprt-mcherry under control of the neuronal marker elavl3. By categorizing transcript products into different protein classes, we identified similarities and differences of gene usage between adult and embryonic neuronal differentiation. We found that neurons in the adult brain and in the nervous system of one day old embryos commonly use transcription factors - some of them identical - during the differentiation process. When we directly compared adult differentiating neurons to embryonic differentiating neurons, however, we found that during adult neuronal differentiation, the expression of neuropeptides and neurotransmitter pathway genes is more common, whereas classical developmental signaling through secreted molecules like Hedgehog or Wnt are less enriched, as compared to embryonic stages.


We conclude that both adult and embryonic differentiating neurons show enriched use of transcription factors compared to surrounding cells. However, adult and embryonic developing neurons use alternative pathways to differentiate. Our study provides evidence that adult neuronal differentiation is distinct from the better characterized embryonic neuronal differentiation process. This important insight and the lists of enriched genes we have identified will now help pave the way to a better understanding of the mechanisms of embryonic and adult neuronal differentiation and how to manipulate these processes.


  • 4tU-labeling
  • Transcriptome
  • Differentiation
  • Zebrafish
  • Uprt
  • Elavl3
  • Differential expression
  • Neuron


During early stages of vertebrate embryonic development, a variety of signaling pathways, including BMP, Wnt, Fgf and Shh are necessary for neuronal induction and patterning [13], while Notch signaling is critical to establish cell identity [4]. Vertebrate embryonic neurons are born in proliferative zones often located near ventricles. Cells that are determined to become neurons must differentiate and migrate to their destinations where they mature into functional neurons. This process depends both on extrinsic factors, such as signaling molecules, and on intrinsic factors, such as transcription factors.

Neurons proliferate throughout the entire life of vertebrates. In adult mammals, proliferation in the brain appears to be most prominent in the subventricular and the subgranular zones of the telencephalon [5, 6], but additional neurogenic zones have been reported in other brain regions in non-mammalian vertebrates (see for review [7]). In contrast to mammals, in teleost fish neuronal progenitor proliferation occurs at a much higher rate and proliferation zones have been identified in many different brain regions, not only located near ventricles but also in distinct regions such as the olfactory bulb, dorsal telencephalon, hypothalamus, preoptic area, hypothalamus, optic tectum, and cerebellum [810]. Some molecular factors are common during both adult and embryonic neurogenesis, for instance, adult and embryonic radial glial cells that act as neuronal progenitors [11] express glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP) or S100 β. Recent research has focused mostly on proliferation and neurogenesis zones, leaving the molecular identity of pathways involved during proliferation and neuronal differentiation under-explored. Finding the common and distinct traits that characterize adult and embryonic neuronal development would help answer questions as to how new neurons migrate, mature and, finally, how these newly made neurons incorporate into an existing neural network.

We used 4tU-labeling, a method based on expression of the introduced transgene uracil-phosphoribosyl-transferase (uprt) [12, 13], to identify the transcriptome of newly made neurons in developing and adult zebrafish (see 4tU flow-chart shown in Additional file 1). Uprt expression allows cells to utilize 4-thiouracil (4tU) as a substrate for making 4t-UTP, which is then incorporated into newly transcribed RNA. Importantly, only cells expressing the transgene are able to incorporate 4tU [14]. This method has the advantage of avoiding manual dissections or fluorescence activated cell sorting and preventing any gene expression changes induced by stress (see [15]). By expressing HA-Uprt-mCherry under the control of the elavl3:gal4 driver line [16], we were able to specifically isolate RNA from differentiating neurons in both adult and embryonic zebrafish [1719]. ELAV-like neuron-specific RNA binding protein 3 (Elavl3) is required for correct differentiation and development of the nervous system [20].

We compared the transcriptomes of elavl3-positive differentiating neurons in the embryonic and adult nervous system and characterized expression of highly enriched or depleted genes. We found that proteins involved in nucleic acid binding are more frequent in differentiating neurons compared to the total of all neurons in the nervous system in both embryos and adults. However, our results suggest that the differentiation process of neurons in adults and embryos is vastly different both at the gene level and the pathway level. These results are significant because they start to fill a large gap in our knowledge regarding the differentiation and maturation of neurons during adult neurogenesis and regeneration.

Results and discussion

The HA-Uprt-mcherry transgene is expressed in neurons in the adult zebrafish brain

Although the elavl3 promoter is commonly used as a pan-neuronal driver for transgene expression in developmental studies [17, 2123], its expression pattern in the adult brain has not been well characterized. We examined expression of the fusion protein HA-Uprt-mCherry by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the epitope HA (Fig. 1) or the fluorescent marker mCherry (not shown) on cross sections of brains from 9 month old transgenic adult zebrafish. Results showed robust expression in distinct regions within the forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain (Fig. 1a-d).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Distribution of HA-Uprt-mCherry transgene expression on cross sections of adult zebrafish brain. a Section showing HA labeling (cyan) in the dorsal telencephalon (dT) and the diencephalic ventricle (DiV). b High magnification of the dorsal habenula (Had) in the anterior diencephalon, with HA labeling in cells and projections (white arrowhead) from the Had to the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN) in the mesencephalon. c Section through the cerebellum showing HA-localization near the rhombencephalic ventricle (RV, Lobus caudalis cerebelli (LCa)). d HA-expression in the ventral half of the eminentia granularis (EG) and axon projections. Elavl3/4 labeling (white) marks most cells of the EG. e Co-labeling of HA and the proliferation marker PCNA (yellow) in a high magnification of the diencephalic ventricle (DiV) shows no overlap. f HA-labeling and the glial marker GFAP (red) are not co-expressed in the same cells. g HA-positive cells in the vicinity of the diencephalic ventricle. Elavl3/4 labeling (white) partially overlaps with HA labeling (cyan) but shows a much broader expression domain than HA labeling. h Most HA-positive neurons are located in the dorsal part of the rhombencephalic ventricle (RV). The ventricle is outlined by Elavl3/4 labeling (white). i Some HA-positive neurons are located within the periventricular gray zone (PGZ, white arrowheads). Many HA-labeled neurons are located at the margin of the PGZ and the optic tectum (TeO, yellow arrowhead). Elavl3/4 labeling marks most cells of the PGZ. j High magnification of the diencephalic ventricular zone showing co-expression of HA (cyan) and endogenous Elavl3 (magenta) within the population of Elavl3/4-positive neurons (green). k Overlapping expression of HA, Elavl3 and Elavl3/4 in the dorsal habenula. l Ventrally located nucleus in the hypothalamus shows that all Elavl3-positive neurons co-express HA-Uprt-mCherry (white arrowhead and inset). Cartoons in a-d and i show lateral views of adult zebrafish brain indicating the level of the individual cross sections. e-g and i. Sections show a similar level as in a or c, respectively. The panels j’, j”, j”’, k’, k”, k”’ and l’, l”, l”’ show single channels. Scale bars represent 100 um in a; 40 um in b, g; 150 um in c; 45 um in d, h; 25 um in e, f; 35 um in i; 20 um in h, k; and 30 um in l

In the adult forebrain, HA-Uprt-mCherry was distributed in a salt-and-pepper pattern throughout the olfactory bulb and the dorsal telencephalon (Fig. 1a). We found many cells expressing HA-Uprt-mCherry near the telencephalic and diencephalic ventricle (Fig. 1a) and the telencephalic surface. This distribution reflects the expected location of post-mitotic neurons in the proximity of proliferating zones, as the telencephalon of teleosts forms by eversion, such that the proliferative periventricular zones are not only present internally but also cover the outer surface of the telencephalon [7]. In addition to proliferative zones, the dorsal habenula (Had, Fig. 1b), showed robust expression of the HA-Uprt-mCherry transgene. We noticed a size difference between the left and the right HA-Uprt-mCherry labeling of the dorsal habenula, consistent with previously described left-right asymmetry of the epithalamus in the adult zebrafish brain [24]. Interestingly, axonal projections originating from the dorsal habenula and targeting the ventrally located interpeduncular nucleus were strongly labeled (Fig. 1b, arrowhead), suggesting that HA-Uprt-mCherry is expressed in differentiating neurons and their projections.

In brain regions posterior to the forebrain, the expression of HA-Uprt-mCherry near ventricles appeared to be more restricted. We found a larger number of HA-Uprt-mCherry-positive cells in the vicinity of ventricular zones of the forebrain (Fig. 1g) than in the more caudally located rhombencephalic ventricle (RV, Fig. 1h), where HA-Uprt-mCherry-positive cells are more sparsely distributed around the ventricle. However, many cells were labeled for HA-Uprt-mCherry dorsal to the RV across the corpus cerebelli, lobus caudalis cerebelli (LCa) and laterally in the eminentia granularis (EG), (Fig. 1c). In a slightly more posterior section of the cerebellum, HA-positive neurons appeared in a subset of cells located in the ventral part of the EG (Fig. 1d), with projections extending to or coming from more medial parts of the cerebellum.

We next focused on determining whether the HA-Uprt-mCherry protein expression pattern was indicative of newly differentiated neurons. Therefore, we first compared HA-Uprt-mCherry expression with proliferation and glial cell markers. We expected HA-Uprt-mCherry and the pan-neuronal marker Elavl3/4, an antibody that recognizes both Elavl3 and Elavl4 proteins, to be expressed in post-mitotic neurons [25]. The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, yellow) was expressed in cells outlining the ventricle (Fig. 1e, DiV outlined in white). HA-Uprt-mCherry-expressing cells were located at about two cell diameters distance from the ventricle, as would be expected for newly generated neurons that are born in proliferative zones and migrate to their target positions. HA-Uprt-mCherry expression did not overlap with PCNA, suggesting that HA-Uprt-mCherry, similar to Elavl3 (not shown), is not expressed in proliferative or neurogenic cells. Further, HA-Uprt-mCherry was restricted to neuronal cells but not glial cells, as confirmed with the glial cell marker (GFAP, red, DiV outlined in white) (Fig. 1f). These results suggest that HA-Uprt-mCherry, similar to Elavl3 and Elavl3/4 proteins (not shown, [25]), is expressed in post-mitotic neurons and not in other brain cells, including glia, demonstrating specificity.

Next, we tested whether the expression of HA-Uprt-mCherry recapitulated that of endogenous Elavl3 and/or Elavl3/4 proteins. We compared HA-labeling to Elavl3/4-labeling in different parts of the brain (Fig. 1g-i). The observation that Elavl3/4 labeled many more cells than HA was also true for other brain regions, such as the ventricles of the forebrain (Fig. 1g), the cerebellum (Fig. 1h) and the periventricular gray zone (PGZ) in the optic tectum (Fig. 1i). While we found strong expression of Elavl3/4 in the proliferation zone of the PGZ, we found only some cells expressing HA-Uprt-mCherry within the PGZ and many HA-positive neurons at the border of the PGZ and in the optic tectum (Fig. 1i, marked by white and yellow arrowheads, respectively). We conclude that the transgene HA-uprt-mcherry is expressed in a subset of Elavl3/4-positive cells, presumably specifically in Elavl3-positive cells.

We then examined whether all cells expressing HA (cyan) also expressed Elavl3 (magenta), confirming the specificity of transgene expression (green, Fig. 1j-l). Zebrafish Elavl3 protein expression has not been described in the central nervous system of zebrafish so far; therefore we compared the Elavl3 expression pattern to the established neuronal marker Elavl3/4 (see ZFIN, Ab1-elavl, In the diencephalic ventricle (Fig. 1j) and the dorsal habenula (Fig. 1k) all cells were co-labeled with Elavl3 (magenta) and HA (cyan) while Elavl3/4 (green) was more broadly expressed, suggesting that HA-Uprt-mCherry largely recapitulated endogenous Elavl3 protein expression and not the broader Elav3/4 pattern. Further, in one ventral cluster of cells in the hypothalamus, we found that HA-Uprt-mCherry transgene expression was in all Elavl3-positive cells although weakly in some neurons (Fig. 1l, arrowheads, see higher magnification in inset). We conclude that Elavl3-positive neurons co-express HA-Uprt-mCherry, providing evidence that our transgene is expressed in differentiating neurons.

4tU-labeled mRNA reveals neuronal gene expression in adult brain

After verifying the protein distribution of HA-Uprt-mCherry in the adult brain, we felt confident in analyzing the transcriptome of this identified neuronal population. We treated 9 month old adult female and male zebrafish for four hours with 4tU by intraperitoneal injection, recovered brains and purified 4tU-labeled mRNA. We found that 606 genes were statistically significantly enriched and 406 genes were depleted in the adult brain 4tU-labeled mRNA samples compared to total mRNA, with an adjusted p-value (padj) less than 0.1 (red dots, Fig. 2a). In the following text, we call these significantly differentially expressed genes “enriched” or “depleted,” respectively. A list of the most enriched and depleted genes is shown in Fig. 2b. The full data set can be found in Additional file 2. As expected, the transgene HA-uprt-mcherry with a log2-fold change of 4.56 appears on top of the list of all enriched genes (green). This result confirms that we were able to specifically target and isolate mRNA from cells expressing the enzyme HA-Uprt-mCherry.c
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Data analysis and verification of 4tU-labeled mRNA isolated from adult zebrafish brain. a Distribution plot showing the log fold change of individual reads compared to the mean expression using DESeq2. The red dots indicate significantly enriched or depleted genes (padj < 0.1). Some labeled enriched or depleted genes were analyzed for their expression pattern (see d). b List of the most-enriched genes (green) and (c) most depleted genes (blue) and their log2-fold change compared to total mRNA expression levels. Asterisks mark genes used for expression studies. d Cross sections of transgenic adult zebrafish brains labeled with HA labeling (a, f, k, n) or in situ probes of enriched genes (b-e, g-j, l, m green bar) as indicated on each image. j’a-c and j” are higher magnifications of boxes shown in j and j’, respectively. j’b and j’c show cyp26a1 in situ hybridization and HA IHC labeling, respectively. j’a and j” show cyp26a1 in situ hybridization and HA IHC labeling. Expression of depleted genes (p,q, blue bar). Cartoon (in r) showing the corresponding sections in a, f and n. dTel, dorsal Telencephalon, vTel, ventral Telencephalon, Hab, habenula, dHab, dorsal Hab, vHab, ventral Hab, TeO, optic tectum, DiV, diencephalic ventricle, VOT, ventrolateral optic tract, TelV, telencephalic ventricle. Scale bars represent 100 um in da-j, n,q and 65 um in dk-m

To verify that the identified genes are expressed in cells positive for the transgene HA-Uprt-mCherry, we performed in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on brain sections of transgenic zebrafish (Fig. 2d). We randomly chose seven genes that are highly enriched with a log2-fold change of at least 2.5 (denoted by asterisks in Fig. 2b) and compared their expression pattern to mcherry expression and/or anti-HA IHC (Fig. 2d). As expected, we found that the expression pattern of all seven enriched genes overlapped with HA-Uprt-mCherry (Fig. 2 da,f,k,n) in neurons. HA antibody labels neurons, similar to ISH, and also neuropil, making HA-labeling appear more broad.

In the adult telencephalon, the protein distribution of HA-Uprt-mCherry was located in the vicinity of the diencephalic ventricle, the telencephalic surface and in neurons throughout the forebrain in a sparse distribution (Fig. 2da, dn). In addition, we found strong labeling of the neuropil in the ventral telencephalon, which was identified by protein but not transcript labeling. The transcript mcherry was expressed in overlapping regions (Fig. 2db). In a similar section, the expression of the LIM homeobox transcription factor (TF)-encoding gene lhx8a was restricted to the ventral ventricle (Fig. 2dc), whereas the distal-less homeobox TF-encoding gene dlx5a was expressed near the ventricle and in additional clusters lateral to the ventricle (Fig. 2dd). Expression of the NK2 homeobox TF-encoding gene nkx2.1 was restricted to the ventral-most part of the ventricle (Fig. 2de). In a more posterior section of the telencephalon, we found HA labeling in part of the habenula (Hab), the ventrolateral optic tract (VOT), the optic tectum (TeO) and near the diencephalic ventricle (DiV, Fig. 2df). We found a similar distribution of mcherry transcript expression (Fig. 2dg). The LIM homeobox TF-encoding gene lhx6 (Fig. 2dh) and the neuropeptide gene pyyb (Fig. 2di) were expressed in similar domains as mcherry (Fig. 2dh, di). However, lhx6 was more broadly expressed in neurons throughout the telencephalon (Fig. 2dh). In contrast, cyp26a1, which encodes a retinoic acid metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 superfamily member, was expressed sparsely in the dorsal part of the diencephalon (Fig. 2dj). We verified co-expression of all enriched genes with HA-Uprt-mCherry by two-color ISH/IHC labeling. As an example we show that cyp26a1-positive cells (blue) were co-labeled with HA-Uprt-mCherry protein (magenta) in some but not all cells (Fig. 2dja-c, and j” showing a magnification of the inset in j’a). This result suggests that 4tU-labeling is sensitive to transcripts that may be expressed in only a few cells. Further, we localized expression of mcherry mRNA to the dorsal habenula (Fig. 2dl), consistent with the HA-Uprt-mCherry protein distribution (Figs. 2dk, 1b). The guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) gng8, a known marker of the habenula, was an enriched gene (Fig. 2a, b) and overlapped well with mcherry expression (Fig. 2dm). We conclude that all genes tested are expressed in neurons that overlap with the transgene HA-Uprt-mCherry. This result suggests that our procedure isolated preferentially transcripts expressed in cells containing HA-Uprt-mCherry, which allowed us to identify transcripts enriched specifically in differentiating neurons.

We also examined the expression patterns of two depleted genes (see Fig. 2c): drd4 and esrra. The dopamine receptor drd4 showed strong expression in the forebrain (Fig. 2dp) that partially overlapped, but had much broader expression, than HA-Uprt-mCherry protein and mcherry transcript (Fig. 2dn,o). We found ubiquitous expression for the estrogen receptor esrra (Fig. 2dq) with spotted labeling (Fig. 2dq inset) and more restricted expression in the olfactory bulb (not shown). In general, HA-Uprt-mCherry appeared more restricted than the expression of the tested depleted genes, leading to a higher number of transcripts in total mRNA compared to mRNA isolated from HA-Uprt-mCherry-positive neurons.

In summary, we specifically isolated and verified mRNA transcripts of even infrequently expressed genes from HA-Uprt-mCherry-positive neurons in the adult zebrafish brain.

Gene ontology analysis shows enrichment and depletion of specific types of genes in adult brain

We used Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (Panther) analysis tools [26, 27] to identify the most relevant molecular function categories of enriched and depleted genes, respectively (padj < 0.05, Fig. 3a). Panther output charts give an overview of the molecular function of the genes in the list and one gene can appear in multiple molecular function categories. We analyzed a total of 332 enriched genes, resulting in 381 function hits. We found that the majority of enriched genes fell into the gene ontology (GO) class “binding” (45 % of total differentially expressed genes), which includes nucleotide, chromatin, ion, lipid and antigen binding. Additional highly represented categories were “catalytic” (29 %) and transcription factors (TF, 15 %) while other categories, such as structural molecules, regulator, protein binding TF, receptor and transporter were not strongly represented (under 7 %). The most common GO term categories in the depleted gene list (223 genes analyzed with 242 function hits) were “binding” (28 %) and “catalytic” (28 %), similar to the enriched genes (Fig. 3a). However, in contrast to enriched genes, receptors (18 %) and transporter activity (13 %) were more frequent in the depleted list. Other categories were represented in less than 4 % of all genes. We conclude that “binding” appears to be a relevant function in newly made neurons, while receptors and transporters are expressed less than in the rest of the brain.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Molecular function and protein classes for enriched and depleted genes from adult zebrafish brain. a Graphs showing significantly enriched or depleted genes with padj < 0.05 categorized into different classes of molecular function using Panther gene ontology tools. The “number of genes” falling into each protein class is indicated on the Y-axis. b Overrepresentation graph of enriched (green) and depleted (blue) genes (padj < 0.05) showing the percent of genes in the list compared to the reference gene list (red) and categorized for protein class

To find the protein classes that are strongly represented in differentiating neurons, we used the Panther overrepresentation test, which compares the proportion of genes assigned to a functional class between a given gene list (Fig. 3b, enriched genes in green, depleted in blue) and a reference gene list (Fig. 3b, red). As a reference gene list we used all zebrafish genes in the database (Panther Overrepresentation test release 20150430, including 25357 mapped gene IDs). Using the list of enriched genes, protein classes that were overrepresented included proteins involved in mRNA processing and splicing, nucleic acid, DNA- and RNA- binding and different classes of transcription factors (Fig. 3b, green, p < 0.05, Bonferroni correction, for p-values see Additional file 3) compared to the reference gene list. This result is consistent with actively differentiating cells.

Other protein classes expected in more mature neurons, such as receptors and cell adhesion molecules, were represented less frequently than the reference gene list. In 332 enriched genes (padj < 0.05), we did not find genes typically expressed in proliferating cells or mature neurons, suggesting that our samples were not significantly contaminated by other cell types. Within the depleted genes (Fig. 3b, blue), transporter proteins were more frequently represented compared to the reference gene list, while nucleic acid binding proteins were under-represented. Our data suggest that in the adult zebrafish brain, binding proteins, RNA-modifying proteins and neuropeptides are preferentially expressed during neuronal differentiation.

4tU-labeled mRNA reveals gene expression in embryonic brain

We next asked whether genes similar to the ones enriched in adult zebrafish brain are also enriched during neuronal differentiation in zebrafish embryos. We prepared RNAseq libraries from one day old embryos, a stage that is often used for expression pattern analysis because the developing nervous system has advanced to a morphology that allows identification of different brain anlage substructures [28]. Embryos were incubated with 4tU in embryo medium starting at 22 h post fertilization (hpf), sacrificed after 4 h of incubation and used without any further dissection for 4tU-labeled RNA purification.

Results identified 154 statistically significantly enriched genes and 992 depleted genes compared to total mRNA isolated from the same embryos (Fig. 4a). Red dots in Fig. 4a represent significantly enriched and significantly depleted genes (p-adjusted value < 0.1). In Fig. 4b and c, we list the top enriched and depleted genes. The full list of genes appears in Additional file 4. The transgene HA-uprt-mcherry was 1.66 log2 fold enriched. Because Uprt-mCherry-HA is expressed in many neuronal cells at this stage, the differences between 4tU-labeled mRNA and total mRNA is not expected to be very high [29].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Data analysis and expression patterns of 4tU-labeled mRNA transcripts isolated from whole embryos. a Distribution plot showing the log fold change of individual reads compared to the mean expression using DESeq2. The red dots indicate significantly enriched or depleted genes. b List of the top enriched (green) and (c) depleted (blue) genes and their log2-fold change compared to total mRNA expression levels. Genes used for expression study are marked with asterisks. In addition uprt-mcherry and dlx2a are shown to demonstrate enrichment for the transgene and a gene common with adult purified mRNA, respectively. d In situ hybridization of 24–26 hpf embryos, lateral view showing enriched (b-h, green bar) or depleted genes (i-l, blue bar). dc,d,f-l show images published by The Zebrafish Model Organism Database (ZFIN) [47, 48]. fb, forebrain, mb, midbrain, crg, cranial ganglia, sc, spinal cord. Scale bar represents 100 um

To further validate the specificity of the 4tU labeling method, we examined the expression patterns of some of the genes with high or intermediate log-fold change in 22–26 hpf embryos by ISH (marked by asterisks in Fig. 4b). Uprt-mCherry protein (Fig. 4 da) and transcript (Fig. 4db) were expressed almost exclusively, but broadly, in the nervous system. The desumoylating isopeptidase desi1a (Fig. 4dc) was expressed in tissues very similar to uprt-mcherry in the forebrain, retina, midbrain, hindbrain and cranial ganglia. In contrast, distal-less homeobox TF dlx2a and eomesodermin homolog eomesa showed expression restricted to the forebrain (Fig. 4de,f). The G protein-coupled receptor gpr22 was strongly expressed in the forebrain, epiphysis, olfactory bulb, cranial ganglia and heart tube (Fig. 4dd). In contrast, neuronal pentraxin-like gene nptx1l lacked expression in the forebrain, but was strongly expressed in the cranial ganglia, spinal cord and in the pharyngeal arches (Fig. 4dg). The purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene pnp4a showed expression in the retina and in some pigment cells (Fig. 4dh). The expression patterns of all these genes overlapped well with at least some regions expressing HA-Uprt-mCherry.

We then examined the expression of depleted genes (Fig. 4di-l). Results showed that RNA polymerase rbp2a was expressed in a cluster of cells in the ventral retina (Fig. 4di), presumably retinoic acid-synthesizing enzyme expressing cells [30], whereas the glutathione peroxidase gene gpx4a was expressed only in the yolk syncytial layer and not in the nervous system (Fig. 4dj). The cystatin 14a.2 gene cst14a.2 (formerly known as zgc:56530) was detected in axial vasculature, epidermis, hatching gland and also showed expression in the yolk syncytial layer (Fig. 4dk). Further, we found that parvalbumin pvalb1 was strongly expressed in the muscle (Fig. 4dl). These results showing that depleted genes are not expressed in elavl3-expressing cells confirm the specificity of enriched genes to tissues that express the HA-Uprt-mCherry transgene.

Gene ontology analysis shows that transcription factor-encoding genes are enriched in the embryonic nervous system

We examined the molecular function (Fig. 5a) of enriched genes in embryonic brains (79 genes analyzed, padj < 0.05) using Panther software. We found a high number of genes correlating with the GO term “binding” (48 %), nucleic acid binding TF (47 %), “catalytic” (18 %) and receptors (15 %). In the 637 depleted genes, we found that most genes were linked to “catalytic” (36 %) and to a lesser extent “binding” (24 %) functions. Other categories were represented to a lower extent (<7 %). Results suggest that nucleic acid binding TF activity appears to be critical for differentiating neurons compared to other cells in the embryo (47 % in enriched vs 1 % in depleted).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Graphs showing molecular function and protein class for enriched and depleted genes from zebrafish embryos. a Gene Ontology graphs showing the molecular function of significantly enriched or depleted genes with padj < 0.05. The Y-axis shows the number of genes in each category. b Overrepresentation graph of enriched (green) and depleted (blue) genes (padj < 0.05) showing the percent of genes in the list compared to a reference gene list (red) and categorized for protein class

We then examined whether TFs and binding proteins are overrepresented in embryonic enriched genes (Fig. 5b, green, for p-values see Additional file 3). Nucleic acid binding proteins and TFs in general and in particular homeobox and helix-turn-helix TFs were found in much higher percentages than expected when compared to the reference gene list (red). In the depleted gene list (Fig. 5b, blue), consisting of genes originating from many different tissues, we found several protein classes moderately overrepresented compared to the reference gene list, for instance transfer/carrier proteins and Calcium-related proteins. This data identifies TFs as the most relevant protein class in embryonic differentiating neurons.

In summary, we identified and verified genes significantly enriched and depleted in differentiating neurons in the developing embryo, many of which are nucleic acid binding proteins and are likely important during neuronal differentiation.

Adult and embryonic differentiating neurons express distinct suites of genes

To find genes common to neuronal differentiation in both adults and embryos, we directly compared all statistically significant genes (padj < 0.1; enriched and depleted) that were differentially expressed in adults with differentially expressed genes in embryos. Of the 1012 differentially expressed genes from adult brain and the 1146 differentially expressed genes from embryos, only 96 were in common (Fig. 6). Further, when we restricted analysis to enriched genes from both cell populations (605 in adult, 154 in embryos), we found just 19 enriched genes in common (see list, Fig. 6), suggesting that these genes are used for similar processes during neuronal differentiation at both life stages. This number represents only about 2.5 % of the total number of enriched genes found in both adult and embryonic differentiating neurons, implying that adult and embryonic neuronal differentiation might have substantial differences in gene usage. This small number of common genes is consistent with the idea that there may be important differences in neuronal differentiation at these two developmental stages: the embryonic nervous system is forming de novo, while neurons differentiating in the adult are integrating into an already existing functional nervous system.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Common genes found in adult brain and embryonic nervous system. a Venn diagram showing the distribution of all statistically significant genes for adult brain and embryonic nervous system. Enriched genes are a subset for both adult and embryonic sets. 19 genes are significantly enriched in both adult brain and embryonic nervous system (b). Table with a list of the 19 enriched genes common to both adult brain and embryonic nervous system

To identify genes that are differentially expressed between neurons of the adult brain and the embryonic nervous system, we directly compared the number of genes for the purified samples between adults and embryos. Genes enriched in embryos (vs adults) were then filtered for neuronal expression, using nervous system-specific genes obtained from ZebrafishMine ( and Panther Classification system [27] (see Additional file 5). This analysis resulted in 3111 genes enriched and 559 decreased in adult versus embryo (see Additional file 6).

We searched for protein classes that are overrepresented among the genes enriched in adult brain versus embryonic CNS by comparing to the reference gene list (Fig. 7a, for p-values see Additional file 3). In zebrafish adult differentiating neurons, we found that various neurotransmitter receptors (see [26, 31, 32]) and neuropeptides [33], implicated in processes both during neuronal development and neuronal function, showed enrichment, while transcription factors were less represented than expected when compared to the reference gene list. Further, various types of channels, such as calcium channels and sodium channels, were overrepresented. Calcium signaling is not only important for neuronal proliferation and migration, but also for differentiation by regulating neurotransmitter phenotype, dendritic morphology and axonal growth and guidance (see [34]).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Transcriptome differences between adult brain and embryonic nervous system. a Graphs showing log of fractional difference between observed and expected protein classes of enriched transcripts in adult brain and embryonic nervous system. b Graphs showing overrepresented pathways in adult (green) and embryonic nervous system (blue) when directly comparing isolated 4tU-labeled mRNAs with each other. The red bars represent numbers from the reference gene list

We also examined protein pathways and compared their calculated overrepresentation to the reference gene list. Some pathways were significantly overrepresented (padj < 0.05, Bonferroni correction) during adult neuronal differentiation compared to embryonic neuronal differentiation processes. Interestingly, in adult brain, metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptor (GluR) pathways were significantly overrepresented (Fig. 7b, green columns) within adult enriched genes over embryo enriched genes when compared to the reference gene list (red). Further, GABA-B receptor II signaling and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (AchR) signaling were enriched in adult transgene-expressing cells suggesting that during adult neuronal differentiation, neurotransmitter pathways, most known for their function during neuronal signaling in mature and functional neurons, may play an important role during neuronal differentiation and migration of post-mitotic neurons. Alternatively, it is possible that differentiating neurons in the adult brain start to express mature neuronal genes at earlier steps in the pathway of neuron development than differentiating neurons in the embryonic brain. Importantly, we conclude that the difference between embryonic and adult differentiating neurons is bona fide, and not due to sample contamination from surrounding tissue. This conclusion is based on the significant differences in the comparisons between purified samples and total RNA, which suggest that adult differentiating cells express more transcription factors than are expressed in the whole brain (Figs. 2 and 3).

Pathways represented more frequently (padj < 0.05, Bonferroni correction) than expected in embryonic differentiating neurons (vs adult) include Hedgehog, Notch, Cadherin and Wnt signaling pathways, all of which are critical for neuronal differentiation in the developing embryo [2, 4, 35]. For instance, lhx2a and lhx2b, which are enriched in embryonic 4tU-expressing cells compared to adult brain, are important for neuronal differentiation in the thalamus by regulating Wnt signaling [36]. We conclude that different pathways are used during embryonic and adult neuronal differentiation. Our results are important because they identify genes to target for more detailed analyses of single gene functions to fully understand the molecular processes involved, especially during neuronal differentiation in the adult brain.


4tU-labeling identified the transcriptome of differentiating neurons in the adult brain and the embryonic zebrafish nervous system. Some protein classes, such as general binding proteins and in particular transcription factors are overrepresented in embryonic and adult 4tU-labeled mRNA when compared to total mRNA. We verified co-expression of HA-Uprt-mCherry protein with enriched or depleted genes tested by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, we found that different pathways are overrepresented in adult brain when compared to embryonic neural development, such as the GluR pathway, while morphogen-related pathways appear to be more prominent during embryonic development than in adults. Our finding that the process of neuronal differentiation differs between embryonic and adult stages should now spur additional studies to more closely describe the underlying mechanisms. These insights will help us understand how neurons differentiate in the adult brain and how this process may be enhanced in cases of acute brain trauma.


Generation of the construct UAS:uprt-mCherry-HA

We generated a fusion protein HA-Uprt-mCherry consisting of a vertebrate version of Uprt, a fluorescent protein mCherry for immediate visualization and an HA-epitope for antibody detection [13]. HA-Uprt with vertebrate-specific codon usage, provided by Chris Q. Doe (University of Oregon), was amplified by PCR to contain attB1 and attB2 sites at the 5’ and 3’ ends, respectively. Recombination was performed using Gateway ® BP clonase (Life Technologies) into pDONR221 to generate pME-HA-UPRT [37]. A 3-way recombination reaction using p5E-4xnr-UAS (obtained from Mary Goll), pME-HA-UPRT, and p3E-mCherry-pA (from the Tol2Kit: into pDESTTol2pA (also from the Tol2Kit) was performed using LR Clonase (Gateway ®), to generate pDEST-4xnr-UAS-HA-UPRT-mCherry.

Animal husbandry and lines

Purified DNA was injected into fertilized wild-type (AB) zebrafish eggs at the one-cell stage together with RNA encoding Tol2 transposase to generate stable transgenic zebrafish Tg(UAS:HA-uprt-mcherry), following standard protocols [37]. Zebrafish embryos for the 4tU-labeling experiments were obtained from natural spawning of the transgenic lines Tg(elavl3:Gal4-VP16 413–470 ), see psi1Tg ( and Tg(UAS:uprt-mcherry-HA). Fish were staged by hours post fertilization (hpf) at 28.5 °C [38]. All procedures were carried out under an approved protocol with the University of Oregon Animal Care and Use Committee.

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry on whole Tg(elavl3:Gal4-VP16 413–470 );Tg(UAS:HA-uprt-mcherry) embryos and on brain cryostat sections (16 um) were carried out according to standard protocols [39]. The following antibodies were used: anti-HA.11 (clone 16B12, 1:500, abcam), rabbit anti-HA (1:500, Bethyl Laboratories), anti-Elavl3 (ab78467, 1:100, abcam), anti-Elavl (formerly known as anti-HuC/D 16A11, 1:40, University of Oregon), anti-GFAP (zrf-1, 1:100, Zebrafish International Resource Center) and anti-PCNA (1:500, Dako). Primary antibodies were revealed using secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa-Fluor dyes (goat anti-rabbit, goat anti-mouse [H + L], IgG1, IgG2a; 1: 500, Life Technologies) or coupled to horse radish peroxidase (HRP, 1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch).


Embryos were scored and imaged on an inverted Nikon TU-2000 microscope with an EZ-C1 confocal system (Nikon) or viewed with a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope and photographed with a Zeiss AxioCam MRc5 camera.

4tU delivery in embryos and adult zebrafish and collection of tissue

We incubated Tg(elavl3:Gal4-VP16 413–470 );Tg(UAS:HA-uprt-mcherry) embryos from 22 hpf to 26 hpf in 4tU [29] at a final concentration of 1 mM 4tU/DMSO solution in E3 embryo medium for 4 h in the dark. Whole embryos were euthanized and processed for RNA isolation. For adult experiments, we injected 4tU/DMSO solution at a concentration of 25 mg/mL per 100 mg of fish, mixed with corn oil, into the abdominal cavity of adult 9 month old transgenic female and male zebrafish and let the fish recover in tank water for 4 h. After euthanizing the fish, we recovered the brains and processed them for RNA isolation.

RNA isolation and affinity purification of thio-labeled mRNA

We isolated total RNA from about 250 embryos or 10 adult brains for each sample, homogenized the tissue in TRIzol (LifeTechnologies) and purified RNA according to the TRIzol protocol. After quantification (Qubit), we diluted the RNA to 0.5 ng/uL and kept 1 uL as total RNA reference. Biotin-Thiol coupling and Streptavidin purification were performed according to published protocols [29]. We analyzed RNA quantity and quality using the fragment analyzer software PROSize.

First strand synthesis and RNAseq library preparation

Equivalent amounts of streptavidin-purified RNA and total RNA that had been saved directly after the RNA isolation step, were processed using the SMARTer Ultra Low Input mRNA for Illumina Sequencing kit (Clontech). Samples were amplified between 12 and 15 cycles and the cDNA was eluted from magnetic beads in 12 uL water. We used 5 uL from each sample for the “tagmentation” reaction of the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina). Index primers (Nextera XT Index Kit, Illumina) were added and libraries from four separate RNA samples were mixed at equal concentrations and sequenced in one lane of an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing Core Facility, OSU) resulting in 100 base pair (bp) single end reads. We sequenced two biological replicates of each purified and total mRNA set, and analyzed the data accordingly. See flow-chart shown in Additional file 1.

Data analysis

Sequenced reads were filtered for sequences that passed the Illumina chastity filter, had all adapters removed, and were quality trimmed, resulting in sequences with at least 25 bp length, using CutAdapt [40] and Trimmomatic [41], using the parameters SLIDINGWINDOW:5:20 LEADING:20 MINLEN:25. Reads were aligned against the zebrafish genome assembly version Zv9 and annotated using the gene transfer annotation file (GTF) Danio_rerio.Zv9.78 using the splice-site aware program GSNAP [42]. Reads aligning to exons were counted by HTSeq [43], using the “intersection-strict” mode. Only protein-coding genes were considered (BioMart, [44]) and analyzed using DESeq2 [45], using default parameters [46]. Gene Ontology was analyzed using the Panther Classification System [27], using the settings p-value < 0.05 and true Bonferroni correction.

Availability of supporting data

The data set supporting the results of this article are available in the LabArchives repository DOI 10.6070/H4QC01HW ( and within the article and its additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, available as Adobe pdf file or excel spreadsheets (xlsx file format).





Central nervous system


Dorsal Habenula


Diencephalic ventricle


Dorsal Telencephalon


Eminentia granularis


Hemaglutinin tag






In situ hybridization


Lobus caudalis cereblli


Proliferating cell nuclear antigen


Periventricular grey zone


Optic tectum


Telencephalic ventricle


Transcription factor




ventral Habenula


ventral Telencephalon


Ventrolateral optic tract



We thank Tatjana Pietrowsky for providing Elavl3;Gal4-VP16 fish and Johann Eberhart, Jamie Nichols, Yi-Lin Yan, Marianne Voz, Catherine Becker, Wolfgang Driever, Jean-Marc Vanacker, Marnie Halpern, Scott Stewart for providing plasmids or antibodies, Trevor Enright for help with fish husbandry, the University of Oregon Zebrafish Facility staff for animal care and the University of Oregon Histology Facility for preparing sections. This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R01 NS065795 to P.W.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of Child Health and Development P01 HD022486 to P.W., J.S.E., and J.P; the NIH Office of the Director grants R01 OD011116 to J.P. and R24 0D011199 to J.P. and W. Cresko; and National Institute of Mental Health R21/33 MH104188 to P.W. and J.S.E.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
Current address: Vollum Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA


  1. Ulloa F, Briscoe J. Morphogens and the control of cell proliferation and patterning in the spinal cord. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(21):2640–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wilson SI, Rydstrom A, Trimborn T, Willert K, Nusse R, Jessell TM, et al. The status of Wnt signalling regulates neural and epidermal fates in the chick embryo. Nature. 2001;411(6835):325–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dessaud E, McMahon AP, Briscoe J. Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network. Dev. 2008;135(15):2489–503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Louvi A, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Notch signalling in vertebrate neural development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(2):93–102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Luskin MB. Restricted proliferation and migration of postnatally generated neurons derived from the forebrain subventricular zone. Neuron. 1993;11(1):173–89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaplan MS, Hinds JW. Neurogenesis in the adult rat: electron microscopic analysis of light radioautographs. Sci. 1977;197(4308):1092–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmidt R, Strahle U, Scholpp S. Neurogenesis in zebrafish - from embryo to adult. Neural Dev. 2013;8:3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Adolf B, Chapouton P, Lam CS, Topp S, Tannhauser B, Strahle U, et al. Conserved and acquired features of adult neurogenesis in the zebrafish telencephalon. Dev Biol. 2006;295(1):278–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Grandel H, Kaslin J, Ganz J, Wenzel I, Brand M. Neural stem cells and neurogenesis in the adult zebrafish brain: origin, proliferation dynamics, migration and cell fate. Dev Biol. 2006;295(1):263–77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zupanc GK, Hinsch K, Gage FH. Proliferation, migration, neuronal differentiation, and long-term survival of new cells in the adult zebrafish brain. J Comp Neurol. 2005;488(3):290–319.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunne B, Zhao S, Derouiche A, Herz J, May P, Frotscher M, et al. Origin, maturation, and astroglial transformation of secondary radial glial cells in the developing dentate gyrus. Glia. 2010;58(13):1553–69.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller MR, Robinson KJ, Cleary MD, Doe CQ. TU-tagging: cell type-specific RNA isolation from intact complex tissues. Nat Methods. 2009;6(6):439–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gay L, Miller MR, Ventura PB, Devasthali V, Vue Z, Thompson HL, et al. Mouse TU tagging: a chemical/genetic intersectional method for purifying cell type-specific nascent RNA. Genes Dev. 2013;27(1):98–115.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cleary MD, Meiering CD, Jan E, Guymon R, Boothroyd JC. Biosynthetic labeling of RNA with uracil phosphoribosyltransferase allows cell-specific microarray analysis of mRNA synthesis and decay. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(2):232–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tallafuss A, Washbourne P, Postlethwait J. Temporally and spatially restricted gene expression profiling. Curr Genomics. 2014;15(4):278–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Stevenson TJ, Trinh T, Kogelschatz C, Fujimoto E, Lush ME, Piotrowski T, et al. Hypoxia disruption of vertebrate CNS pathfinding through ephrinB2 Is rescued by magnesium. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002638.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Park HC, Kim CH, Bae YK, Yeo SY, Kim SH, Hong SK, et al. Analysis of upstream elements in the HuC promoter leads to the establishment of transgenic zebrafish with fluorescent neurons. Dev Biol. 2000;227(2):279–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ito Y, Tanaka H, Okamoto H, Ohshima T. Characterization of neural stem cells and their progeny in the adult zebrafish optic tectum. Dev Biol. 2010;342(1):26–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tallafuss A, Kelly M, Gay L, Gibson D, Batzel P, Karfilis KV, Eisen J, Stankunas K, Postlethwait JH, Washbourne P: The transcriptomes of post-mitotic neurons identify the usage of alternative pathways during adult and embryonic neuronal differentiation - Supporting Data. In.; 2015.
  20. Akamatsu W, Okano HJ, Osumi N, Inoue T, Nakamura S, Sakakibara S, et al. Mammalian ELAV-like neuronal RNA-binding proteins HuB and HuC promote neuronal development in both the central and the peripheral nervous systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(17):9885–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fosque BF, Sun Y, Dana H, Yang CT, Ohyama T, Tadross MR, et al. Neural circuits. Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators. Sci. 2015;347(6223):755–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sato T, Takahoko M, Okamoto H. HuC:Kaede, a useful tool to label neural morphologies in networks in vivo. Genesis. 2006;44(3):136–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Freeman J, Vladimirov N, Kawashima T, Mu Y, Sofroniew NJ, Bennett DV, et al. Mapping brain activity at scale with cluster computing. Nat Methods. 2014;11(9):941–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gamse JT, Kuan YS, Macurak M, Brosamle C, Thisse B, Thisse C, et al. Directional asymmetry of the zebrafish epithalamus guides dorsoventral innervation of the midbrain target. Dev. 2005;132(21):4869–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Marusich MF, Furneaux HM, Henion PD, Weston JA. Hu neuronal proteins are expressed in proliferating neurogenic cells. J Neurobiol. 1994;25(2):143–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Berg DA, Belnoue L, Song H, Simon A. Neurotransmitter-mediated control of neurogenesis in the adult vertebrate brain. Dev. 2013;140(12):2548–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D377–386.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Schier AF, Neuhauss SC, Harvey M, Malicki J, Solnica-Krezel L, Stainier DY, et al. Mutations affecting the development of the embryonic zebrafish brain. Dev. 1996;123:165–78.Google Scholar
  29. Gay L, Karfilis KV, Miller MR, Doe CQ, Stankunas K. Applying thiouracil tagging to mouse transcriptome analysis. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(2):410–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Canestro C, Catchen JM, Rodriguez-Mari A, Yokoi H, Postlethwait JH. Consequences of lineage-specific gene loss on functional evolution of surviving paralogs: ALDH1A and retinoic acid signaling in vertebrate genomes. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(5), e1000496.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim SY, Choi KC, Chang MS, Kim MH, Kim SY, Na YS, et al. The dopamine D2 receptor regulates the development of dopaminergic neurons via extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Nurr1 activation. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2006;26(17):4567–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Heng JI, Moonen G, Nguyen L. Neurotransmitters regulate cell migration in the telencephalon. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(3):537–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Agasse F, Xapelli S, Coronas V, Christiansen SH, Rosa AI, Sarda-Arroyo L, et al. Galanin promotes neuronal differentiation in murine subventricular zone cell cultures. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(11):1693–708.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg SS, Spitzer NC. Calcium signaling in neuronal development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(10):a004259.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirano S, Suzuki ST, Redies C. The cadherin superfamily in neural development: diversity, function and interaction with other molecules. Front Biosci. 2003;8:d306–355.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Peukert D, Weber S, Lumsden A, Scholpp S. Lhx2 and Lhx9 determine neuronal differentiation and compartition in the Caudal Forebrain by regulating Wnt signaling. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(12):e1001218.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C, Mangum BD, Hardy ME, Campbell DS, et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn. 2007;236(11):3088–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book. In: A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 4th ed. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  40. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetjournal. 2011;17:10–2.Google Scholar
  41. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinform. 2014;30(15):2114–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Y, Li Y, Fan X, Zhang Y, Wu J, Zhao Z. Early proliferation alteration and differential gene expression in human periodontal ligament cells subjected to cyclic tensile stress. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(2):177–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Smedley D, Haider S, Durinck S, Pandini L, Provero P, Allen J, et al. The BioMart community portal: an innovative alternative to large, centralized data repositories. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W589–98.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D749–755.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Thisse B, Thisse C. Fast Release Clones: A High Throughput Expression Analysis. ZFIN Direct Data Submission; 2004.
  48. Thisse C, and Thisse B: High Throughput Expression Analysis of ZF-Models Consortium Clones. ZFIN Direct Data Submission. 2005.