Open Access

Genome-wide characterization of soybean P 1B -ATPases gene family provides functional implications in cadmium responses

Contributed equally
BMC Genomics201617:376

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2730-2

Received: 19 May 2015

Accepted: 12 May 2016

Published: 20 May 2016

Abstract

Background

The P1B-ATPase subfamily is an important group involved in transporting heavy metals and has been extensively studied in model plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Emerging evidence indicates that one homolog in Glycine max is also involved in cadmium (Cd) stress, but the gene family has not been fully investigated in soybean.

Results

Here, we identified 20 heavy metal ATPase (HMA) family members in the soybean genome, presented as 10 paralogous pairs, which is significantly greater than the number in Arabidopsis or rice, and was likely caused by the latest whole genome duplication event in soybean. A phylogenetic analysis divided the 20 members into six groups, each having conserved or divergent gene structures and protein motif patterns. The integration of RNA-sequencing and qRT-PCR data from multiple tissues provided an overall expression pattern for the HMA family in soybean. Further comparisons of expression patterns and the single nucleotide polymorphism distribution between paralogous pairs suggested functional conservation and the divergence of HMA genes during soybean evolution. Finally, analyses of the HMAs expressed in response to Cd stress provided evidence on how plants manage Cd tolerance, at least in the two contrasting soybean genotypes examined.

Conclusions

The genome-wide identification, chromosomal distribution, gene structures, and evolutionary and expression analyses of the 20 HMA genes in soybean provide an overall insight into their potential involvement in Cd responses. These results will facilitate further research on the HMA gene family, and their conserved and divergent biological functions in soybean.

Keywords

Soybean HMA P1B-ATPase Phylogenetic analysis Cadmium Expression analysis

Background

Heavy metal pollution is an increasing environmental problem affecting human health. Among the heavy metal pollutants, cadmium (Cd) has become one of the most toxic heavy metals to animals and plants owing to its high mobility and toxicity. Long-term low-level Cd exposure causes a variety of serious health risks, including emphysema, bone damage (Itai-Itai), cancer, cardiovascular disease, and irreversible chronic renal failure [13]. The burden of Cd on the body depends mostly on the dietary intake of plant-derived foods [3] because plants accumulate Cd in the edible parts. The roots uptake the element from Cd-contaminated soils and it is subsequently transported from roots to shoots or grains [4, 5]. Recent molecular genetic studies have identified several gene families involved in the regulation of Cd uptake or transport from Arabidopsis, rice, and soybean [68], including the P1B-ATPases, the natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins, and the cation diffusion facilitators [9].

P1B-ATPases are a subfamily of P-type ATPases and have also been described as CPx-ATPases [10], metal P-type ATPases [11], and heavy metal ATPases (HMAs) [12]. The main function of P1B-ATPases is involved in the transport of metal cations across biological membrane [6, 11, 13, 14]. Previous studies showed that besides conserved regions in the P-type ATPases, such as DKTGT, GDGxNDxP, PxxK, and S/TGE, P1B-ATPases specifically possess six to eight transmembrane segments (TMs), a HP locus, a CPx/SPC motif [15] essential for metal transport, and putative metal-binding domains in the N- and/or C-terminal regions [6, 9]. Unlike other P-type ATPase subfamilies, P1B-ATPases can transport multiple heavy metals, such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), Cd, lead (Pb), and cobalt (Co) in a wide range of organisms and are divided into two groups: Cu/Ag (Cu+-ATPases) and Zn/Cd/Co/Pb transporters (Zn2+-ATPases), based on their substrate specificity [11, 12]. In the model plants Arabidopsis and rice, there are eight and nine P1B-ATPases, respectively, which have been divided into six groups [6, 16]. Molecular genetic studies demonstrated that Arabidopsis HMA5, 6, 7, and 8 are specific to Cu/Ag transporters [15], while HMA2, 3, and 4 are specific to Zn/Cd transporters [17, 18]. In contrast to the other members of the HMA gene family, AtHMA1 likely contributes to two types of transporter activities [19], and similar phenomena were also observed in rice HMA members [20].

Soybean is an economically and nutritionally crucial crop, and provides not only vegetable protein and edible oil, but also essential amino acids for humans and animals. Owing to the rapid urban and industrial development, Cd contamination, especially in agricultural soils, is becoming a more and more serious problem in southern China [2123]. Soybean is a Cd-sensitive species and can accumulate Cd even at low-Cd soil concentrations. In addition, soybean genotypes are highly variable regarding Cd tolerance and grain Cd accumulation [24, 25], and several major quantitative trait loci associated with Cd responses have been identified [26, 27]. For example, cda1 and cd1 in chromosome 9 were associated with low-Cd concentrations in grains. After narrowing the region between the two markers, six annotated genes, including GmHMA1/GmHMA3 (now named as GmHMA13), which is involved in Cd response [28, 29]. Moreover, a study showed that GmHMA8 is able to transport Cu [30]. Thus, soybean HMA genes could play an important role in Cd tolerance. However, molecular features and expression information on this family are largely unknown in soybean.

Soybean is a paleopolyploid [31] with two lineage-specific whole genomic duplications (WGD), resulting in ~75 % of the total gene complement being present in multiple copies [32]. Here, we found that soybean has 20 HMA genes, which is more than in Arabidopsis or rice. For convenience, these genes were redefined from GmHMA1 to GmHMA20. A phylogenetic analysis divided the 20 GmHMAs into six clusters. Based on the known HMA functions in Arabidopsis and rice, six GmHMAs (GmHMA5, 19, 13, 16, 14, and 18) were classified as Zn2+-ATPases, while the other HMA members in soybean were identified as Cu+-ATPases. Intron/exon structural patterns and conserved motifs among the 20 HMAs showed a high level of consistency between gene organization and protein structure. The expression patterns of the 20 genes in different tissues and the variation of the SNP distribution between wild and cultivated soybean lines suggest that they may be both functionally conserved and divergent. To further investigate the roles of these HMA genes in Cd tolerance, we examined their expression patterns in two previously identified soybean Cd-responsive genotypes, HX3 (a Cd-tolerant and low-accumulator cultivar) and ZH24 (a Cd-sensitive and high-accumulator cultivar) [33]. Analyses of the 20 HMAs’ expression responses to Cd stress provide an explanation for how plants deal with Cd tolerance, in terms of the HMA family, at least in the two examined contrasting soybean genotypes.

Results

Identification and nomenclature of HMA genes in soybean

To investigate the HMA gene family present in the soybean genome, the BLAST algorithm was used to search the phytozome website (http://www.phytozome.net/), with default settings, using the known soybean HMA8 gene [GenBank: ABD64063.1] [30] as the query. In total, 68 genes were identified. After screening these genes for the conserved HMA motifs (DKTGT, GDGxNDxP, PxxK S/TGE, HP, and CPx/SPC), the remaining 20 genes were considered HMAs, which was consistent with the soybean genome annotation (GlymW82.a2.v1). A search using the BLAST algorithm, with another soybean HMA1 [GenBank: BAL46410.1] [29] gene as the query, revealed the same HMA genes. To confirm that the identified proteins in soybean are potential HMAs, we performed a multiple sequence alignment of the 20 HMA protein sequences using DNAMAN and calculated manually the number of matches and mismatches based on the conserved HMA motifs, as described previously [6]. Thus, we believe that the soybean genome contains 20 putative HMA genes. To validate whether these genes are truly expressed, the published RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data from 28 developing soybean tissues were used [34]. With the exception of GmHMA16, which had a low expression level in the stem, the other 19 GmHMAs were expressed in multiple tissues (Additional file 1: Table S1).

For convenience, we redefined the soybean 20 HMA genes, giving them unique names from GmHMA1 to GmHMA20 based on their chromosomal positions, and summarized relevant characteristics of the 20 soybean HMAs (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S2), including annotation, chromosome location, gene loci from both Glyma1.1 and Glyma.Wm82. a2. V1 versions, protein lengths, and the features of exons and introns. To further understand the existing HMA motifs, we then performed a complete multiple protein sequence alignment of all 20 HMAs (Additional file 2: Figure S1) and identified several conserved motifs (Table 1), which were in general agreement with previously identified motifs in other HMA proteins [6]. Specifically, the 18 soybean HMAs contained all six conserved motifs, DKTGT, GDGxNDxP, PxxK, TGE, HP, and CPx/SPC, as described previously (Table 1). Interestingly, GmHMA1 lacked the PxxK motif and GmHMA4 lacked the PxxK and GDGxNDxP motifs. In addition, the replacement of DKTGT with SRQGT was also identified in GmHMA4. Thus, these proteins may have divergent functions in soybean during evolution. The DKTGT motif contains a phosphorylatable aspartate, and mutations of this aspartate inhibit the transport capabilities of AtHMA3 and AtHMA4 [35, 36]. PxxK might interact with the oxygen of the phosphate transferred from ATP [37]. D residues in GDGxNDxP were identified as binding magnesium [38]. The replacement or loss of these motifs in GmHMA1 and GmHMA4 indicates that they might lose their functions during gene duplication. Moreover, unlike other HMAs with CPx motifs, GmHMA5 and GmHMA19 possessed a SPC motif, which is a conserved characteristic of AtHMA1 and OsHMA1 [6].
Table 1

Characteristics of 20 GmHMAs

S.N.

Gene name

Chr. No.

Glyma1.1

Glyma.Wm82.a2.v1

Protein length

Motif

1

GmHMA1

01

Glyma01g42790

Glyma.01G219000

913

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

no

GDGINDSP

2

GmHMA2

01

Glyma01g42800

Glyma.01G219100

977

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PETK

GDGINDSP

3

GmHMA3

03

Glyma03g21650

Glyma.03G086000

954

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PVGK

GDGINDSP

4

GmHMA4

04

Glyma04g05897

Glyma.04G056100

512

TGE

CPC

SRQGT

HP

no

no

5

GmHMA5

05

Glyma05g21280

Glyma.05G098800

763

TGE

SPC

DKTGT

HP

PEDK

GEGINDAP

6

GmHMA6

05

Glyma05g24520

Glyma.05G117400

719

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PDEK

GDGINDAA

7

GmHMA7

05

Glyma05g26330

Glyma.05G132900

994

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PAGK

GDGINDSP

8

GmHMA8

06

Glyma06g05890

Glyma.06G056300

903

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PQQK

GDGINDAP

9

GmHMA9

08

Glyma08g01680

Glyma.08G013600

678

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PDQK

GDGINDSP

10

GmHMA10

08

Glyma08g07710

Glyma.08G072400

937

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PDEK

GDGINDAA

11

GmHMA11

08

Glyma08g09240

Glyma.08G087300

994

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PAGK

GDGINDSP

12

GmHMA12

09

Glyma09g05710

Glyma.09G052000

986

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PAGK

GDGINDSP

13

GmHMA13

09

Glyma09g06166

Glyma.09G055600

885

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PAEK

GDGMNDAP

14

GmHMA14

13

Glyma13g00630

Glyma.13G099600

1096

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PEDK

GDGLNDAP

15

GmHMA15

15

Glyma15g17000

Glyma.15G158300

996

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PAGK

GDGINDSP

16

GmHMA16

15

Glyma15g17375

Glyma.15G161300

793

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PSEK

GDGINDAP

17

GmHMA17

16

Glyma16g10760

Glyma.16G088300

921

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PVGK

GDGINDSP

18

GmHMA18

17

Glyma17g06800

Glyma.17G060400

809

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PEDK

GDGINDAP

19

GmHMA19

17

Glyma17g18250

Glyma.17G166800

817

TGE

SPC

DKTGT

HP

PEDK

GEGINDAP

20

GmHMA20

19

Glyma19g32190

Glyma.19G140000

984

TGE

CPC

DKTGT

HP

PDQK

GDGINDSP

Previous studies in both Arabidopsis and rice showed that different HMAs have distinct subcellular localizations [39]. We then predicted the subcellular localizations of the 20 HMAs using TargetP 1.1 and found that only GmHMA14 could be involved in the secretary pathway. GmHMA1, 6, 17, and 20 have a mitochondrial targeting peptide, whereas GmHMA4, 8, 10, and 19 have a chloroplast transit peptide. The localizations of the other 11 HMAs was uncertain owing to the lack of a target peptide (Additional file 1: Table S2). The subcellular localization results also support the divergent functions of HMAs under certain cellular contexts. Moreover, unlike other P-type ATPases, P1B-ATPases have distinct characteristics because of the reduced number of TMs, usually six to eight [15]. We used the TMHMM server to measure the number of TMs in the soybean HMAs. The result showed that, except for five members (GmHMA4, 5, 8, 16, and 19) in three clusters (I, II, and VI) having less than six TMs, the other members identified had six to eight TMs. In particular, GmHMA4 does not contain any TMs, suggesting that it might have lost some functions during gene expansion.

Phylogenetic analysis and chromosomal distribution of soybean HMA genes

To explore the evolutionary relationships of soybean HMA genes, we performed an unrooted phylogenetic analysis for 37 HMA genes from Arabidopsis (Additional file 1: Table S3), rice (Additional file 1: Table S4), and soybean using neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood methods (Fig. 1; Additional file 3: Figure S2). The tree topologies produced by the two methods are largely consistent with each other, with only minor differences at the interior nodes. Both trees divided the HMAs into six distinct clusters, which was consistent with previous studies [6, 20]. Each cluster included genes from Arabidopsis, rice, and soybean, suggesting that the same cluster had a common ancestor. Based on sequence similarities and the phylogenetic tree’s topology, the HMAs were also classified into two groups: Zn2+-ATPases (clusters I and II) and Cu+-ATPases (clusters III and VI) (Fig. 1 and Additional file 3: Figure S2). The former is responsible for Zn, Cd, Co, and Pb transport, while the latter specifically transports Cu and Ag. The relative positions in the phylogenetic tree showed that the genes in clusters III and VI were more closely related to each other than to those in cluster I or II, which is consistent with their different metal transport capabilities.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis of HMA genes among Arabidopsis, soybean, and rice. Neighbor-joining (NJ) methods were used to construct the HMA unrooted tree using HMA amino acid sequences in soybean, Arabidopsis, and rice. NJ bootstrap values are presented for each main clade

As mentioned earlier, soybean has more than double the number of HMA members than either Arabidopsis or rice, which was likely caused by the recent WGD in soybean. Gene duplication mechanisms include tandem duplication (TD) and large segmental/WGD events [40]. To examine which contributed to the expansion of the GmHMA gene family, a chromosome map was constructed based on the locations provided by the SoyBase (Glyma 1.1). The 20 GmHMA genes showed an unequal distribution along the 12 soybean chromosomes (Fig. 2). For example, chromosomes 5 and 8 had three genes, chromosomes 1, 9, 15, and 17 contained two genes, and chromosomes 3, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 19 only had single HMA genes (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Table S2). GmHMA1 and GmHMA2 are likely tandem-duplicated genes because both genes are linked in ~5 kb (Additional file 1: Table S2).
Fig. 2

Distribution of soybean HMA genes on chromosomes. Chromosome size is indicated by its relative length. The scale on the left is in megabases (Mb). The vertical bars on the chromosomes indicate the positions of the centromeres. Segmental duplicated genes are indicated by red lines. The figure was produced and modified using the Map Inspector program

Recent studies indicated that ~75 % of soybean genes are paralogous pairs [41]. We detected the potential paralogous pairs among the 20 GmHMAs using MCScanx as described previously [42] and estimated the duplication time of paralogous pairs using KaKs_Calculator 1.2 (Additional file 1: Table S5) [43]. Subsequently, the 10 paralogous pairs and their duplication time were identified (Fig. 1 and Additional file 3: Figure S2), and included nine pairs of WGD-paralogs: GmHMA3/17, GmHMA4/8, GmHMA5/19, GmHMA6/10, GmHMA7/11, GmHMA9/20, GmHMA12/15, GmHMA13/16, and GmHMA14/18, and 1 TD-paralog, GmHMA1/2. By comparing the positions of the GmHMAs on the chromosome map (Fig. 2) and in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), we found that, for GmHMAs that are clustered together on a chromosome, their respective paralogs were also clustered together on a different chromosome. For example, GmHMA12 and 13 are clustered on the short arm of chromosome 9, and the corresponding paralogs GmHMA15 and 16 are clustered together in the short arm of chromosome 15. Similarly, GmHMA6 and 7 on chromosome 5 correspond to GmHMA10 and 11 on chromosome 8.

Comparisons of gene structures, protein motifs, and SNP distributions among the 20 HMAs in soybean

The intron/exon organization, and the intron types and numbers indicate the evolutionary history within some gene families [4446]. We examined these features in the 20 GmHMA genes and observed that members of the same cluster, such as cluster 1 (GmHMA5 and GmHMA19) and cluster 4 (GmHMA12, GmHMA15, GmHMA7, and GmHMA11), shared similar exon/intron structures, such as intron number and exon arrangement (Fig. 3). In contrast, some members of the same cluster showed variations in the intron/exon organization. For example, obvious changes were found in the 5′ termini of genes when compared with their paralogous pairs, such as GmHMA17, GmHMA9, and GmHMA6. GmHMA14 was observed to have a new insertion in the last exon at the 3′ terminus, suggesting it may have obtained a different function. GmHMA4 lacked seven exons, including those from the 2nd to 4th, and from the 14th to 17th. Additionally, GmHMA4 had a truncation in the 1st exon compared with its paralog GmHMA8. (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Table S2). We also compared the sequence similarities of the exons among the 20 HMAs, as shown in Fig. 3. The distribution of similar exons was uneven. One gene could have only one exon, while another gene could have multiple exons. Thus, intron/exon structure likely resulted in functional conservation and/or diversification during the long-term evolution in the soybean HMA gene family.
Fig. 3

Schematic for HMA intron/exon structures in soybean. The gray lines indicate introns, the green boxes represent exons, the orange boxes indicate 5′ untranslated regions, the blue boxes represent 3′ untranslated regions, and the purple boxes represent novel exons. Similar exon sequences are connected by gray shaded lines

As mentioned earlier, HMA proteins contain several highly conserved motifs, while the functions in the different clusters are obviously divergent. It is reasonable to speculate that, besides the common motifs, each group may have their own specific motifs. Therefore, a motif comparative analysis was conducted for the 20 HMAs. As shown in Fig. 4, 12 types of motifs were observed. Clearly, the 20 HMAs had the same five motifs, motifs 4–8, representing the primary domains of the P1B-ATPases. Among these five conserved motifs, motif 4 represents TGE, motif 6 represents CPx/SPC, motif 7 represents DKTGT, and motif 8 represents HP. However, motif 5 was not well annotated, suggesting that it could be a novel motif in the HMAs. Moreover, the same clusters had similar patterns in terms of motif types, order, and numbers (Fig. 4). For example, members of clusters I and IV shared the same motif pattern, suggesting a potential functional redundancy. However, several proteins lost or gained new motifs in either the N- or C-terminus, such as GmHMA17, 9, and 6, which lost motif 1 or 2 in their N-termini, while GmHMA14 had a new motif 3 in the C-terminus when compared with their paralogous pairs, suggesting a functional divergence between paralogous pairs. Genes with similar exon/intron structures likely have similar motif organizations. For example, genes in clusters I and IV displayed similar structural organization, and proteins in these clusters showed consistent motif arrangements.
Fig. 4

Diagrammatic representation of the 12 motif architectures of the HMA proteins in soybean. Conserved motifs in soybean HMA proteins were identified using the MEME search tool. Different motifs are indicated by different shapes with distinct colors, and the names of all of the members are shown on the left side of the figure. The motif matches are shown with a cutoff p-value less than 0.0001

To confirm the observed gene structure using the public dataset, we examined the 20 gene transcripts using the RNA-seq data from 28 developing soybean tissues [34]. Except for GmHMA19, which contained novel exons (Additional file 4: Figure S3), the exon structures of the genes were in agreement with the previous annotation.

To further investigate functional conservation and divergence among the 20 HMAs, we analyzed the distribution of SNPs previously generated from 31 wild and cultivated soybean lines [47]. In total, 864 SNPs were identified and 15 % of them were located in the exons. In addition, the SNP distribution pattern was obviously different between paralogous pairs. While GmHMA5/19 and GmHMA13/16 displayed similar numbers of SNPs in both exon and intron/untranslated regions, the other pairs exhibited SNP variations in either the exon or intron/untranslated regions (Additional file 1: Table S6). Specifically, both GmHMA8 and 18 showed higher SNP numbers over the whole gene than their paralogs GmHMA4 and 14, respectively. A similar situation was also found between GmHMA1 and 2 (Additional file 1: Table S6). Further analysis showed that ~55 % SNPs (72 out of 130) in exons were non-synonymous. With the exception of GmHMA20 without non-synonymous mutation, GmHMA3, 4 and 18 displayed > 80 % of non-synonymous mutation rate. Thus, the different SNP distribution patterns and non-synonymous mutation rate, especially between paralogous pairs, provides additional evidence to support the functional divergence among HMAs during evolution.

Expression analysis of HMA genes in soybean and a comparison of the corresponding homologs in Arabidopsis and rice

To further understand the potential functions of GmHMA genes, we investigated the expression patterns of 20 soybean HMAs using our previously generated RNA-seq data from 11 tissues of HX3, a soybean cultivar [41]. This dataset allowed us to detect 17 genes (Fig. 5) and, except for GmHMA16, GmHMA13, and GmHMA4, they showed expression in specific tissues or developmental stages as detected by RNA-seq from developing tissues of 28 soybeans (Additional file 1: Table S1). As shown in Fig. 5, genes in different clusters showed non-overlapping expression patterns, suggesting divergent functions, whereas genes in the same clusters usually displayed similar expression patterns, indicating a functional redundancy between paralogous pairs. For example, cluster IV exhibited a different expression pattern than other clusters. Furthermore, two pairs of paralogs in cluster IV were also different, but each pair showed a similar expression pattern, such as GmHMA12 and 15 having their highest expression levels in callus, whereas GmHMA7 and 11 had their highest levels in roots (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Heatmap of soybean HMA genes in 11 examined tissues. AM, axillary meristem; SAM6D, SAM17D, and SAM38D, shoot apical meristem at the 6-, 17-, and 38-day stages, respectively; IBM, inflorescences before meiotic stage; IAM, inflorescences after meiotic stage; OF, open flower

To compare the corresponding homologs in other species, we also obtained the expression profiles of HMA genes in roots, stems (stem hypocotyls), leaves, flowers (inflorescences), pods, and seeds from soybean (Additional file 1: Table S7 and Additional file 5: Figure S4), Arabidopsis (Additional file 1: Table S8), and rice (Additional file 1: Table S9) generated by SoySeq, AtGenExpress, and PLEXdb, respectively. Most of the genes in soybean, Arabidopsis and rice had very broad expression spectra. Genes from the same cluster also exhibited similar expression patterns among the three species, suggesting that the genes’ functions are highly conserved among the different species. For example, most genes from clusters II–IV were preferentially expressed in the roots of the three species (Additional file 5: Figure S4 and Additional file 1: Tables S4–S6), suggesting that those genes may play an important role in root development or stress response. In addition, GmHMA6 and 10 shared the same expression patterns in leaves, and their Arabidopsis counterpart, AtHMA6, also showed a similar pattern. However, GmHMA19 and 5 in cluster I showed high expression levels in leaves, which was inconsistent with their counterpart HMA1, which was highly expressed in Arabidopsis flowers and in rice seeds, suggesting a functional divergence. Thus, based on the HMAs’ expression information among soybean, rice, and Arabidopsis, we speculated that the HMA gene family may have a distinct functional conservation and redundancy among different species.

Validation of GmHMA gene expression in different tissues and an analysis of their responses to Cd stress using qRT-PCR

To validate the GmHMA expression information from the published database generated by SoySeq, we conducted a qRT-PCR experiment using six samples (roots, stems, leaves, flowers, pods, and seeds) from two genotypes, HX3 (a Cd-tolerant and low-accumulator cultivar) and ZH24 (a Cd-sensitive and high-accumulator cultivar) under normal conditions. Fifteen candidate genes were detected in at least one tissue (Additional file 1: Table S10). Because the public soybean data and our qRT-PCR experiment used similar tissues, the expression patterns of most of the examined genes were consistent between the two methods, except for the undetectable GmHMA4 and 20. Seven genes (GmHMA1, 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, and 13) and two genes (GmHMA3 and 19) were preferentially expressed in roots and leaves, respectively. These results support the reliability of our HMA expression information.

Previous studies demonstrated that HMAs play very important roles in Cd responses in soybean [28, 29]. In this study, we compared the expression patterns of 20 soybean HMA genes between two contrasting genotypes, HX3 and ZH24, with and without Cd treatments. As shown in Fig. 6, the expression of 15 genes, but not GmHMA4, 6, 8, 17, and 20, were detected in at least one tissue. Among the detected genes, GmHMA3, 5, 10, and 19 showed wide range expression in the examined tissues, while the other 11 genes displayed tissue-preferential or -specific expression. In total, 14 genes displayed significant changes in their Cd responses between the genotypes or at least in one tissue (Fig. 6). For example, GmHMA7, a root-specific gene, was undetectable in HX3 without Cd treatment, but was detectable in roots treated with Cd. However, no significant expression changes were observed in ZH24 in response to Cd stress. A similar expression pattern was also found for GmHMA12. Interestingly, GmHMA13 was identified as a major gene for Cd accumulation in soybean grains [28, 29] and showed root-specific expression in a Cd-unresponsive manner. The expression levels of GmHMA1, 2, 3, 14, and 19 were significantly increased in HX3 seeds, but only GmHMA3 and 14 were detected in ZH24, by Cd induction. Furthermore, some gene expression levels were also altered in other tissue by the Cd treatment, indicating that plant responses to Cd stress may be involved in the coordinate regulation of HMA gene expression. These findings provide an explanation for the molecular mechanisms of Cd responses in HX3 and ZH14.
Fig. 6

Expression patterns of HMA genes in six tissues in two soybean genotypes by qRT-PCR. Samples are color coded: HX3 without Cd treatment (HX3-CK) in green, HX3 with Cd treatment (HX3-Cd) in gray, ZH24 without Cd treatment (ZH24-CK) in red, ZH24 with Cd treatment (ZH24-Cd) in blue. For each gene, the expression levels obtained by normalization to ACT3 are presented on relative scales. Data are average values ± SD from three experiments, each carried out in triplicate. The significance of the changes between HX3 and ZH24 with or without Cd was assessed using the Student’s t-test at the level of P ≤ 0.05 (“*”) and P ≤ 0.01 (“**”)

Gene structure and protein motif organization analyses indicated that functional redundancy and divergence might occur between paralogous pairs. To test this hypothesis, a comparative analysis of expression patterns was conducted between each paralogous pair. Except for four paralogous pairs (GmHMA3/17, GmHMA9/20, GmHMA6/10, and GmHMA4/8) that had detectable expression information in at most one gene, the other paralogous pairs could be classified into three different types based on their expression change after Cd exposure. The Type I response, which displayed similar expression patterns between paralogous pairs without Cd exposure, but showed different changes after the Cd treatment, was observed for GmHMA5/19, GmHMA1/2, and GmHMA7/11. For example, both GmHMA5 and 19 were expressed in six examined tissues; however, GmHMA5 expression was significantly reduced in ZH24 roots, while GmHMA19 displayed an obvious induction in HX3 leaves in response to Cd exposure. In addition, both GmHMA1 and 2 were predominantly expressed in roots, but they exhibited opposite Cd responses, suggesting a functional divergence. Type II had different expression patterns with or without Cd treatments. For instance, GmHMA13 and 16 were mainly expressed in roots and stems, respectively. However, only GmHMA16 displayed a Cd response. A similar situation was found for GmHMA12/15. Type III only included GmHMA14/18, which showed comparative expression levels between the genotypes and the Cd treatments. Together, these results also provide an explanation of how the genetic variation in HX3 and ZH24 affected Cd responses in terms of altered paralogous gene expression levels after Cd exposure.

Discussion

Soybean is a critical source of vegetable protein and edible oil, and has the ability to accumulate Cd in its seeds. Understanding the mechanisms of Cd accumulation in soybeans grown in Cd-contaminated soil is a very important issue for food safety. Previous studies demonstrated that P1B-ATPases play crucial roles in the detoxification and accumulation of Cd in several species, but mainly model plants, such as Arabidopsis [48] and rice [49]. Recently, extensive studies also identified GmHMA3 [28] (GmHMA1 [29]) and GmHMA8 [30] from soybean, as being involved in heavy metal responses, but the molecular features and expression patterns of the HMA family remained to be investigated. The present study fully used molecular methods and systematic bioinformatics to analyze the HMA family in soybean as related to Cd responses.

WGD causes the expansion of HMA genes in soybean

Gene duplications are considered a primary driving force in the evolution of genomes and genetic systems [50]. A recent study indicated that 90 % and 62 % of loci have undergone duplication events in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively [51]. Polyploidy generates massive duplications, resulting in an important source of genetic innovation [52, 53]. Soybean is a paleopolyploid [31], leading to nearly 75 % of the genes being present in multiple copies [32]. A recent study indicated that 2713 and 37,746 duplicate genes were caused by TD and WGD, respectively [41]. Here, we identified 20 members of the HMA family in soybean and revealed that these 20 genes could be 10 paralogous pairs. Among them, one pair is a tandem repeat, supporting the idea that TD was also involved in the expansion of the soybean HMA gene family. The other nine pairs evolved from segmental duplications, suggesting that segmental duplication plays a pivotal role in HMA gene expansion in the soybean genome. This has also been found for other gene families in soybean [44, 54].

Possible conservation and divergence of HMA genes in soybean

Gene duplication is an important mechanism for understanding evolutionary novelties, while a divergence of the duplicated gene’s expression is highly correlated with a functional divergence [55, 56]. Expression patterns detected by both public RNA-seq data (generated by SoySeq) and qRT-PCR using multiple tissues provided evidence that nearly all of the soybean HMA genes detected had wide or distinct expression patterns, indicating that soybean HMA genes are likely functional after WGD events. Most soybean HMA genes are expressed in multiple tissues, suggesting that they have a general role in plant development. A small number of soybean HMA genes showed tissue-preferential expression, suggesting that those genes may have specific roles in a certain cell context.

The comparison of paralogous pairs’ expression patterns revealed that some pairs had similar expression patterns, suggesting that they might have undergone sub-functionalization, further supporting the idea that sub-functionalization might be a predominant event for WGD-duplicated genes in soybean. For example, GmHMA5/9 are expressed in multiple tissues. Several pairs displayed different expression patterns, indicating that they might have undergone neo-functionalization after WGD in soybean. For example, GmHAM13 was predominantly expressed in roots, while its paralog GmHMA16 was mainly expressed in stems (Fig. 6). In addition, comparative analyses of gene expression with non-synonymous mutation rate among paralogs showed that non-synonymous mutation rate had a significant negative correlation with the gene expression levels. For instance, GmHMA6 and 18 showed higher non-synonymous mutation rate (Additional file 1: Table S6), while displayed lower gene expression than their paralogs (GmHMA10 and 14) (Additional file 1: Table S7). Thus, our results provide an overall view of the functional redundancy and divergence in the HMA family that occurred after WGD in soybean.

Potential role of HMA genes in soybean Cd responses

Previous studies demonstrated that GmHMA3 [28] (also known as GmHMA1 [29], now defined as GmHMA13) and GmHMA8 [30] are involved in heavy metal responses. To fully address the overall expression patterns of HMA in soybean, we examined their expression patterns in two genotypes with contrasting Cd responses, HX3 (Cd-tolerant cultivar) and ZH24 (Cd-sensitive cultivar) [33], with or without Cd treatments (Fig. 6 and Additional file 1: Table S10). The coordinate and distinct expression patterns of the HMA family members indicated that they might systematically regulate Cd redistribution. Specifically, HMA1 was identified in both Arabidopsis and rice, and displayed the same subcellular localization in chloroplasts [39, 57]. However, it was demonstrated to be involved in Cu and Zn transport in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively [39, 57]. Changes in the Cu/Zn distribution may affect Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase activities [39], finally leading to Cd resistance [33]. Here, we found, using TargetP 1.1, that the soybean homolog GmHMA19 also had a chloroplast transit peptide (Additional file 1: Table S2). The expression pattern of GmHMA19 resembled its Arabidopsis homolog, suggesting that it may also have a similar role in soybean. However, significant changes in GmHMA19 expression under Cd treatment were found in HX3, but not in ZH24, providing an explanation for HX3’s Cd tolerance. It is likely that GmHMA19 elevates Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase activity in chloroplasts [33].

The phylogenetic tree showed that cluster II contains four soybean HMA genes (GmHMA13, 14, 16, and 18) and three Arabidopsis genes (AtHMA2, AtHMA3, and AtHMA4) (Fig. 1). GmHMA14 and 18 are homologs of AtHMA2 and 4, while GmHMA13 and 16 are the AtHMA3 homologs. In Arabidopsis, AtHMA2 and AtHMA4 have similar expression patterns, and are expressed mainly in vascular tissues [39]. Genetic studies demonstrated that both genes contribute to Cd translocation from roots to shoots. Additionally, the rice homolog OsHMA2 also has a similar function in Cd translocation [58, 59]. In contrast, soybean GmHMA14 was mainly expressed in the seeds of both HX3 and ZH24 (Fig. 6 and Additional file 1: Table S10). Interestingly, GmHMA18 was only expressed in the seeds of ZH24 after Cd exposure. This finding not only indicates a functional divergence of this gene across different species, but also supports the high Cd accumulation observed in ZH24.

AtHMA3 was the first HMA identified as a Cd/Pb transporter and can rescue the ycf1 yeast mutant strain [35]. Its expression is strictly in vascular tissues and root apices [48], which was also observed for the rice homolog of OsHMA3 [49, 60]. A functional study demonstrated that OsHMA3 has an important role in the translocation of Cd to the tonoplast, thereby creating seeds with low Cd accumulation [60]. The soybean homolog GmHMA16 showed a Cd-responsive expression in stems of both HX3 and ZH24, but GmHMA13 (previously named GmHMA1/3), a soybean homolog of AtHMA3, did not response to Cd. In previous studies a single-base substitution was found in GmHMA13, a major gene controlling seed Cd accumulation, but there was no significant expression difference between the two types of soybean genotypes with contrasting Cd accumulation levels [2730].

Moreover, the distinct expression of the GmHMA13/16 paralogous pair suggests that they might gain new functions after duplication. GmHMA13 was a Cd-unresponsive gene with root-specific expression, but its expression level was higher in ZH24 than in HX3, indicating that it may help ZH24 to redistribute more Cd in the roots. Whereas, GmHMA16 is a Cd-responsive gene and its expression level in stem was also higher in ZH24 than in HX3, with or without Cd treatments, indicating that ZH24 may accumulate more Cd than HX3 in both shoots and seeds.

Conclusions

Here, we show that the soybean genome has 20 HMA family members, presented as 10 paralogous pairs, which is significantly more than in Arabidopsis and rice, which is likely the result of the latest WGD in soybean. The phylogenetic analysis divided the 20 members into six groups, each having conserved or divergent gene structure and protein motif patterns. Integration of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data from multiple tissues provided the overall expression patterns for the HMA family in soybean. A further comparison of the expression patterns of the paralogous pairs provides insights into the functional conservation and divergence of HMA genes in soybean. Finally, analyses of HMA expression patterns in response to Cd stress provided an explanation of how plants manage Cd tolerance, in terms of the HMA family, at least in the examined soybean genotypes.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Two soybean genotypes, HX3 (Cd tolerant cultivar) and ZH24 (Cd sensitive cultivar) were used in this study. Also, HX3 is a low grain Cd-accumulated cultivar, while ZH24 is a high grain Cd-accumulated cultivar. Seven days (d) after germination, the soybean seedlings of each cultivar were planted in two types of soils, with 0.10 ± 0.01 mg · kg−1 Cd and 11.32 ± 0.19 mg · kg−1 Cd treatments, separately. The plants were grown in greenhouse under natural condition. Roots, stems and leaves were harvested when the first trifoliate leaves were fully developed. Flowers were harvested from inflorescences. Pods and seeds were harvested when reaching 5 mm in length. All tissue samples were stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction.

Identification and annotation of HMA genes in soybean genome

In order to identify the soybean HMA genes, we searched the entire soybean genome (Glyma1.1) by TBLASTN and BLASTP with two known soybean HMA1/8 [GenaBank: ABD64063.1 and GenBank: BAL46410.1], at phytozome website (http://www.phytozome.net/) with default settings, separately. Alternative search using the October 2013 version (Glyma1.1) of the genome sequence was performed. Sequences were confirmed as GmHMAs using conserved sequence motifs (conserved in all P-type ATPases: DKTGT, GDGxNDxP, PxxK and S/TGE, only in P1B-ATPases: HP and CPx/SPC) as described previously by Williams and Mills [6].

Information of soybean HMA genes, including protein sequences, cDNA sequences, genomic sequences, numbers of exons and introns, first exon length and total exon length were extracted from the phytozome website (http://www.phytozome.net/). The molecular weight and isoelectric point of the protein were predicted by the ExPASy server (http://www.expasy.org/). The subcellular location predication was performed by TargetP 1.1 Server. The transmembrane segments in proteins were predicted by TMHMM server.

Exon/intron organization of soybean HMA genes were determined by soybean genome annotation gff file (Glyma1.1), using the online software GSDS 2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). For analyses of similar sequences of exons among 20 HMAs, CDS sequences of 20 HMA genes were extracted from the phytozome website (http://www.phytozome.net/). We used the online software MEME (http://meme-suite.org/) to identify similar sequences of exons each other (the maximum sequence length with 300 bp and the minimum sequence length with 50 bp).

Prediction of novel transcript region of the 20 GmHMAs were conducted using RNA-seq data extracted from the published paper [34]. These raw RNA-seq data were used to blast against the soybean genome by TopHat software [61] and viewed by inGAP software [62]. SNP information was used from the published data [47].

Chromosome distribution and syntenic analysis of soybean HMA genes

Chromosomal location of the 20 soybean HMAs was obtained from soybean genome browse (Glyma1.1) and Map Inspect (http://www.mybiosoftware.com/mapinspect-compare-display-linkage-maps.html) was used to map the HMA genes onto chromosomes. We used the MCScanx software [42] to identify potential paralog pairs of HMAs in soybean. WGD genes and TD genes were detected with default parameters. Ks and Ka, the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions per site, were detected with KaKs_Calculator 1.2 [43]. Then, the Ks value was used to estimate the duplication time of duplicated HMA gene pairs in soybean.

Phylogenetic tree construction of HMAs

Genome sequences of soybean HMA genes were retrieved from the phytozome website. The full-length amino acid sequences of rice [16], Arabidopsis [16] and soybean (Additional file 1: Table S11) HMAs were aligned using ClustalX [63]. The NJ tree was constructed using the Molecular Genetics Analysis (MEGA) 6.0 with the “pairwise deletion” option and “Poisson correction” model. Bootstrap support was estimated from 1000 replicates to evaluate the reliability of internal branches. The ML tree was generated using PhyML version 3.0.1 model [64].

Expression analysis of HMAs genes in Arabidopsis, rice and soybean

To obtain expression patterns of GmHMAs in different tissues, we used the transcriptome data of HX3 generated from 11 meristems [41] and RNA-seq data from 28 developing soybean tissues [34]. Comparative analysis of expression profiles of homologous genes among Arabidopsis, rice and soybean were extracted from Soyseq (http://soybase.org/soyseq/) [65], AtGenExpress (http://jsp.weigelworld.org/AtGenExpress/resources/) [66] and PLEXdb (http://www.plexdb.org/modules/PD_browse/experiment_browser.php) database [67], respectively.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from roots, stems, leaves, flowers, young pods and seeds of soybean plants using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (TaKaRa) to avoid contamination of genomic DNA. The first cDNA strand was synthesized from total RNA using the MMLV-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the protocol from the supplier. QRT-PCR analysis was carried out using the SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix kit (BIO-RAD) on a CXF96 (BIO-RAD). The specific primer sequences for 28 transcripts of 20 predicted GmHMAs were listed in Additional file 1: Table S12. Reaction conditions for thermal cycling were: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 57.0–61.4 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 30 s. The annealing temperature (57.0–61.4 °C) was adjusted to suit the amplification of the individual HMA gene.

In real-time qRT-PCR experiment, three biological replicates within two technical replicates were performed for each sample. Expression level of the soybean ACT3 was used as an internal control [68]. Relative expression levels of gene expression were calculated using the comparative ΔΔC t method [69]. The relative expression level (2-ΔΔCt,HX3-CK(L)) in the normal plant of HX3 without Cd stress was normalized to 1.

Abbreviations

CDFs: 

cation diffusion facilitators

Cu/Zn-SOD: 

Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase

HX3: 

Huaxia3

ML: 

maximum likelihood

NJ: 

neighbor-joining

Nramps: 

natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins

TMs: 

transmembrane segments

ZH24: 

Zhonghuang24

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271745), and National High-tech R&D Program of China (2012AA101106) for YC, and the National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Biology in China (2014ZX0800921B-001) for YW.

Authors’ contributions

CY, YW, QM and HN conceived and designed the experiments. XF, XD and PW preformed the molecular biology. LW performed the bioinformatics. CY, YW, XF and LW contributed to write the manuscript. CY, YW, XF and LW revised the manuscript. All authors had read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding, Guangdong Sub-center of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University
(2)
College of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University
(3)
State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Institute of Genetics, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University

References

  1. Straif K, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens--part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:453–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ciobanu C, Slencu BG, Cuciureanu R. Estimation of dietary intake of cadmium and lead through food consumption. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012;116:617–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clemens S, Aarts MG, Thomine S, Verbruggen N. Plant science: the key to preventing slow cadmium poisoning. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:92–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DalCorso G, Farinati S, Furini A. Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5:663–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lux A, Martinka M, Vaculik M, White PJ. Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:21–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Williams LE, Mills RF. P1B-ATPases--an ancient family of transition metal pumps with diverse functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:491–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall J, Williams LE. Transition metal transporters in plants. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:2601–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Krämer U, Talke IN, Hanikenne M. Transition metal transport. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:2263–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Williams LE, Pittman JK, Hall JL. Emerging mechanisms for heavy metal transport in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1465:104–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Solioz M, Vulpe C. CPx-type ATPases: a class of P-type ATPases that pump heavy metals. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21:237–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rensing C, Ghosh M, Rosen BP. Families of soft-metal-ion-transporting ATPases. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5891–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG. Inventory of the superfamily of P-type ion pumps in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:696–706.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG. Evolution of substrate specificities in the P-type ATPase superfamily. J Mol Evol. 1998;46:84–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Arguello JM. Identification of ion-selectivity determinants in heavy-metal transport P1B-type ATPases. J Membr Biol. 2003;195:93–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Arguello JM, Eren E, Gonzalez-Guerrero M. The structure and function of heavy metal transport P1B-ATPases. Biometals. 2007;20:233–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baxter I, Tchieu J, Sussman MR, Boutry M, Palmgren MG, Gribskov M, et al. Genomic comparison of P-type ATPase ion pumps in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:618–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussain D, Haydon MJ, Wang Y, Wong E, Sherson SM, Young J, et al. P-type ATPase heavy metal transporters with roles in essential zinc homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1327–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Wong CK, Cobbett CS. HMA P-type ATPases are the major mechanism for root-to-shoot Cd translocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2009;181:71–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno I, Norambuena L, Maturana D, Toro M, Vergara C, Orellana A, et al. AtHMA1 is a thapsigargin-sensitive Ca2+/heavy metal pump. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:9633–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Takahashi R, Bashir K, Ishimaru Y, Nishizawa NK, Nakanishi H. The role of heavy-metal ATPases, HMAs, in zinc and cadmium transport in rice. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7:1605–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhao Y, Fang X, Mu Y, Cheng Y, Ma Q, Nian H, et al. Metal pollution (Cd, Pb, Zn, and As) in agricultural soils and soybean, Glycine max, in Southern China. B Environ Contam Tox. 2014;92:427–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia H, Li N, Li Z. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:1551–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong S, Li X, Zhang G, Qi S, Min Y. Heavy metals in agricultural soils of the Pearl River Delta, South China. Environ Pollut. 2002;119:33–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Arao T, Ae N, Sugiyama M, Takahashi M. Genotypic differences in cadmium uptake and distribution in soybeans. Plant Soil. 2003;251:247–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Boggess SF, Willavize S, Koeppe DE. Differential response of soybean varieties to soil cadmium. Agron J. 1978;70:756–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Jegadeesan S, Yu K, Poysa V, Gawalko E, Morrison MJ, Shi C, et al. Mapping and validation of simple sequence repeat markers linked to a major gene controlling seed cadmium accumulation in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:283–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Benitez ER, Hajika M, Yamada T, Takahashi K, Oki N, Yamada N, et al. A major QTL controlling seed cadmium accumulation in soybean. Crop Sci. 2010;50:1728–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y, Yu KF, Poysa V, Shi C, Zhou YH. A single point mutation in GmHMA3 affects Cadmium (Cd) translocation and accumulation in soybean seeds. Mol Plant. 2012;5:1154–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Benitez ER, Hajika M, Takahashi R. Single-base substitution in P 1B- ATPase gene Is associated with a major QTL for seed cadmium concentration in soybean. J Hered. 2012;103:278–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bernal M, Testillano PS, Alfonso M, del Carmen RM, Picorel R, Yruela I. Identification and subcellular localization of the soybean copper P1B-ATPase GmHMA8 transporter. J Struct Biol. 2007;158:46–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shoemaker R, Polzin K, Labate J, Specht J, Brummer E, Olson T, et al. Genome duplication in soybean (Glycine subgenus soja). Genetics. 1996;144:329–38.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010;463:178–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fang X, Zhao Y, Ma Q, Huang Y, Wang P, Zhang J, et al. Identification and comparative analysis of cadmium tolerance-associated miRNAs and their targets in two soybean genotypes. PLoS One. 2013;8, e81471.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Shen Y, Zhou Z, Wang Z, Li W, Fang C, Wu M, et al. Global dissection of alternative splicing in paleopolyploid soybean. Plant cell. 2014;26:996–1008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Gravot A, Lieutaud A, Verret F, Auroy P, Vavasseur A, Richaud P. AtHMA3, a plant P1B-ATPase, functions as a Cd/Pb transporter in yeast. FEBS Lett. 2004;561:22–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Verret F, Gravot A, Auroy P, Preveral S, Forestier C, Vavasseur A, et al. Heavy metal transport by AtHMA4 involves the N-terminal degenerated metal binding domain and the C-terminal His 11 stretch. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:1515–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jorgensen PL, Håkansson KO, Karlish SJ. Structure and mechanism of Na, K-ATPase: functional sites and their interactions. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65:817–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Toyoshima C, Inesi G. Structural basis of ion pumping by Ca2+-ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry. 2004;73:269.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Leonhardt N, Cun P, Richaud P, Vavasseur A. Zn/Cd/Co/Pb P1B-ATPases in plants, physiological roles and biological interest. Metal Toxicity in Plants: Perception, Signaling and Remediation. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 227–48.Google Scholar
  40. Cannon SB, Mitra A, Baumgarten A, Young ND, May G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang L, Cao C, Ma Q, Zeng Q, Wang H, Cheng Z, et al. RNA-seq analyses of multiple meristems of soybean: novel and alternative transcripts, evolutionary and functional implications. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:169.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e49-e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang Z, Li J, Zhao X-Q, Wang J, Wong GK-S, Yu J. KaKs_Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006;4:259–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Du H, Yang S-S, Liang Z, Feng B-R, Liu L, Huang Y-B, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Javelle M, Klein-Cosson C, Vernoud V, Boltz V, Maher C, Timmermans M, et al. Genome-wide characterization of the HD-ZIP IV transcription factor family in maize: preferential expression in the epidermis. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:790–803.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Hudson KA, Hudson ME. A classification of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors of soybean. Int J Genomics. 2015;2015:603182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Lam H-M, Xu X, Liu X, Chen W, Yang G, Wong F-L, et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1053–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Morel M, Crouzet J, Gravot A, Auroy P, Leonhardt N, Vavasseur A, et al. AtHMA3, a P1B-ATPase allowing Cd/Zn/Co/Pb vacuolar storage in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:894–904.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Miyadate H, Adachi S, Hiraizumi A, Tezuka K, Nakazawa N, Kawamoto T, et al. OsHMA3, a P1B-type of ATPase affects root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in rice by mediating efflux into vacuoles. New Phytol. 2011;189:190–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. London: George Alien & Unwin Ltd. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer; 1970.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Moore RC, Purugganan MD. The early stages of duplicate gene evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15682–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Paterson A, Bowers J, Chapman B. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9903–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Wendel JF. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant molecular evolution. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000. p. 225–49.Google Scholar
  54. Mainali HR, Chapman P, Dhaubhadel S. Genome-wide analysis of Cyclophilin gene family in soybean (Glycine max). BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:282.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1679–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor JS, Raes J. Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:615–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Suzuki M, Bashir K, Inoue H, Takahashi M, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK. Accumulation of starch in Zn-deficient rice. Rice. 2012;5:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Satoh-Nagasawa N, Mori M, Nakazawa N, Kawamoto T, Nagato Y, Sakurai K, et al. Mutations in rice (Oryza sativa) heavy metal ATPase 2 (OsHMA2) restrict the translocation of zinc and cadmium. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:213–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Takahashi R, Ishimaru Y, Shimo H, Ogo Y, Senoura T, Nishizawa NK, et al. The OsHMA2 transporter is involved in root-to-shoot translocation of Zn and Cd in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:1948–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ueno D, Yamaji N, Kono I, Huang CF, Ando T, Yano M, et al. Gene limiting cadmium accumulation in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:16500–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Qi J, Zhao F. inGAP-sv: a novel scheme to identify and visualize structural variation from paired end mapping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W567–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Severin AJ, Woody JL, Bolon Y-T, Joseph B, Diers BW, Farmer AD, et al. RNA-seq atlas of Glycine max: a guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:160.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Kilian J, Whitehead D, Horak J, Wanke D, Weinl S, Batistic O, et al. The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV‐B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 2007;50:347–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Dash S, Van Hemert J, Hong L, Wise RP, Dickerson JA. PLEXdb: gene expression resources for plants and plant pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1194–201.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang Y, Yu K, Poysa V, Shi C, Zhou Y. Selection of reference genes for normalization of qRT-PCR analysis of differentially expressed genes in soybean exposed to cadmium. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:1585–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fang et al. 2016

Advertisement