Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1819–29.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Heffner EL, Lorenz AJ, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME. Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost. Crop Sci. 2010;50(5):1681–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernardo R, Yu J. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in Maize. Crop Sci. 2007;47(3):1082–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(2):433–43.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thomson MJ. High-throughput SNP genotyping to accelerate crop improvement. Plant Breed Biotechnol. 2014;2(3):195–212.
Article
Google Scholar
Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007;124(6):323–30.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jannink J-L, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct Genomics. 2010;9(2):166–77.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Heslot N, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME. Perspectives for genomic selection applications and research in plants. Crop Sci. 2015;55(1):1–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Isik F, Kumar S, Martínez-García PJ, Iwata H, Yamamoto T. Chapter Three - Acceleration of Forest and Fruit Tree Domestication by Genomic Selection. In: Plomion C, Adam-Blondon A-F, editors. Advances in Botanical Research, vol. 74. Academic; 2015. p. 93–124. doi:10.1016/bs.abr.2015.05.002.
Grattapaglia D. Breeding Forest Trees by Genomic Selection: Current Progress and the Way Forward. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E, editors. Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources. Springer: Netherlands; 2014. p. 651–82.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007;177(4):2389–97.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, de Roos APW, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics. 2008;178(1):553–61.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Piyasatian N, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection for marker-assisted improvement in line crosses. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(5):665–74.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Grattapaglia D, Resende MV. Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet Genomes. 2011;7(2):241–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MPL. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(1):389–400.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wong CK, Bernardo R. Genomewide selection in oil palm: increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;116(6):815–24.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhong S, Dekkers JCM, Fernando RL, Jannink J-L. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study. Genetics. 2009;182(1):355–64.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Iwata H, Hayashi T, Tsumura Y. Prospects for genomic selection in conifer breeding: a simulation study of Cryptomeria japonica. Tree Genet Genomes. 2011;7(4):747–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Heslot N, Yang H-P, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L. Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 2012;52(1):146–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Plomion C, Chancerel E, Endelman J, Lamy J-B, Mandrou E, Lesur I, Ehrenmann F, Isik F, Bink M, van Heerwaarden J, et al. Genome-wide distribution of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in a mass-selected population of maritime pine. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):171.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Slavov GT, DiFazio SP, Martin J, Schackwitz W, Muchero W, Rodgers-Melnick E, Lipphardt MF, Pennacchio CP, Hellsten U, Pennacchio LA, et al. Genome resequencing reveals multiscale geographic structure and extensive linkage disequilibrium in the forest tree Populus trichocarpa. New Phytol. 2012;196(3):713–25.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ. Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013;194(3):597–607.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hickey JM. Sequencing millions of animals for genomic selection 2.0. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013;130(5):331–2.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beaulieu J, Doerksen T, Clement S, MacKay J, Bousquet J. Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce. Heredity. 2014.
Isik F, Bartholomé J, Farjat A, Chancerel E, Raffin A, Sanchez L, Plomion C, Bouffier L. Genomic selection in maritime pine. Plant Sci. 2016;242:108–19.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Resende MDV, Resende MFR, Sansaloni CP, Petroli CD, Missiaggia AA, Aguiar AM, Abad JM, Takahashi EK, Rosado AM, Faria DA, et al. Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees. New Phytol. 2012;194(1):116–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Isik F. Genomic selection in forest tree breeding: the concept and an outlook to the future. New For. 2014;45(3):379–401.
Article
Google Scholar
Sallam AH, Endelman JB, Jannink J-L, Smith KP. Assessing genomic selection prediction accuracy in a dynamic Barley breeding population. The Plant Genome. 2015;8(1).
Hofheinz N, Borchardt D, Weissleder K, Frisch M. Genome-based prediction of test cross performance in two subsequent breeding cycles. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(8):1639–45.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Illy G. Recherches sur l'amélioration génétique du Pin maritime. Ann Sci For. 1966;1966:765–948.
Article
Google Scholar
Vidal M, Plomion C, Harvengt L, Raffin A, Boury C, Bouffier L. Paternity recovery in two maritime pine polycross mating designs and consequences for breeding. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11(5):1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. https://www.r-project.org/.
Google Scholar
Laloë D. Precision and information in linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 1993;25(6):1–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Laloë D, Phocas F, Ménissier F. Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear models of genetic evaluation. Genet Sel Evol. 1996;28(4):1–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Lindgren D, Gea L, Jefferson P. Loss of genetic diversity monitored by status number. Silvae genetica. 1996;45(1):52–8.
Google Scholar
McRae T, Dutkowski G, Pilbeam D, Powell M, Tier B. Genetic evaluation using the TREEPLAN system. Charleston: IUFRO; 2004.
Google Scholar
Garrick D, Taylor J, Fernando R. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41(1):55.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Plomion C, Bartholomé J, Lesur I, Boury C, Rodríguez-Quilón I, Lagraulet H, Ehrenmann F, Bouffier L, Gion JM, Grivet D, et al. High-density SNP assay development for genetic analysis in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;16(2):574–87.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. Merlin - rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees. Nat Genet. 2002;30(1):97–101.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
de Miguel M, Bartholomé J, Ehrenmann F, Murat F, Moriguchi Y, Uchiyama K, Ueno S, Tsumura Y, Lagraulet H, de Maria N, et al. Evidence of intense chromosomal shuffling during conifer evolution. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(10):2799–809.
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Canales J, Bautista R, Label P, Gómez-Maldonado J, Lesur I, Fernández-Pozo N, Rueda-López M, Guerrero-Fernández D, Castro-Rodríguez V, Benzekri H, et al. De novo assembly of maritime pine transcriptome: implications for forest breeding and biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(3):286–99.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38(6):1358–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Paradis E. pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated–modular approach. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(3):419–20.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wimmer V, Albrecht T, Auinger H-J, Schön C-C. synbreed: a framework for the analysis of genomic prediction data using R. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(15):2086–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pérez P, de los Campos G. Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics. 2014;198(2):483–95.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2009. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3.
Van Raden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91(11):4414–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Pérez P, de los Campos G, Crossa J, Gianola D. Genomic-enabled prediction based on molecular markers and pedigree using the Bayesian linear regression package in R. The Plant Genome. 2010;3(2):106–16.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Park T, Casella G. The bayesian lasso. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(482):681–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gianola D. Priors in whole-genome regression: the Bayesian alphabet returns. Genetics. 2013;194(3):573–96.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Resende MFR, Muñoz P, Acosta JJ, Peter GF, Davis JM, Grattapaglia D, Resende MDV, Kirst M. Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments. New Phytol. 2012;193(3):617–24.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Resende MFR, Muñoz P, Resende MDV, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Davis JM, Jokela EJ, Martin TA, Peter GF, Kirst M. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Genetics. 2012;190(4):1503–10.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Legarra A, Robert-Granié C, Manfredi E, Elsen J-M. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics. 2008;180(1):611–8.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Windhausen VS, Atlin GN, Hickey JM, Crossa J, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME, Raman B, Cairns JE, Tarekegne A, Semagn K, et al. Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments. G3 Genes Genom Genet. 2012;2(11):1427–36.
Google Scholar
Hayes BJ, Bowman P, Chamberlain A, Verbyla K, Goddard M. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41(1):51.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J Anim Sci. 2008;86(10):2447–54.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Munoz PR, Resende MFR, Huber DA, Quesada T, Resende MDV, Neale DB, Wegrzyn JL, Kirst M, Peter GF. Genomic relationship matrix for correcting pedigree errors in breeding populations: impact on genetic parameters and genomic selection accuracy. Crop Sci. 2014;54(3):1115–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Hansen OK, Nielsen UB. Microsatellites used to establish full pedigree in a half-sib trial and correlation between number of male strobili and paternal success. Ann For Sci. 2010;67(7):703.
Article
Google Scholar
Kumar S, Richardson TE. Inferring relatedness and heritability using molecular markers in radiata pine. Mol Breed. 2005;15(1):55–64.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Beaulieu J, Doerksen T, MacKay J, Rainville A, Bousquet J. Genomic selection accuracies within and between environments and small breeding groups in white spruce. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1048.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gamal El-Dien O, Ratcliffe B, Klapste J, Chen C, Porth I, El-Kassaby Y. Prediction accuracies for growth and wood attributes of interior spruce in space using genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):370.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bastiaansen J, Coster A, Calus M, van Arendonk J, Bovenhuis H. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44(1):3.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jannink J-L. Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42(1):35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Goddard M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2008;136(2):245–57.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Asoro FG, Newell MA, Beavis WD, Scott MP, Jannink J-L. Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in Elite North American Oats. Plant Gen. 2011;4(2):132–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Sonesson A, Meuwissen T. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41(1):37.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Muranty H, Jorge V, Bastien C, Lepoittevin C, Bouffier L, Sanchez L. Potential for marker-assisted selection for forest tree breeding: lessons from 20 years of MAS in crops. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014;1–20.
Legarra A, Christensen OF, Aguilar I, Misztal I. Single step, a general approach for genomic selection. Livest Sci. 2014;166:54–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ. Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score1. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93(2):743–52.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92(9):4656–63.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zapata-Valenzuela J, Whetten RW, Neale D, McKeand S, Isik F. Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine. G3 Genes Genom Genet. 2013;3(5):909–16.
Google Scholar
Grattapaglia D. Marker-assisted selection in Eucalyptus. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2007.
Google Scholar
Beaulieu J, Deslauriers M, Daoust G. Flower induction treatments have no effects on seed traits and transmission of alleles in Picea glauca. Tree Physiol. 1998;18(12):817–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Griffin AR, Whiteman P, Rudge T, Burgess IP, Moncur M. Effect of paclobutrazol on flower-bud production and vegetative growth in two species of Eucalyptus. Can J For Res. 1993;23(4):640–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zapata-Valenzuela J, Isik F, Maltecca C, Wegrzyn J, Neale D, McKeand S, Whetten R. SNP markers trace familial linkages in a cloned population of Pinus taeda—prospects for genomic selection. Tree Genet Genomes. 2012;8(6):1307–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Ratcliffe B, El-Dien OG, Klapste J, Porth I, Chen C, Jaquish B, El-Kassaby YA. A comparison of genomic selection models across time in interior spruce (Picea engelmannii × glauca) using unordered SNP imputation methods. Heredity. 2015.