Skip to main content

Table 4 p-distances (p-D) and standard error (SE) values of mitochondrial F-orfs vs H-orfs and Fcox1 vs Hcox1 in comparisons between gonochoric vs. closely related hermaphroditic freshwater mussel species

From: In silico analyses of mitochondrial ORFans in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) provide a framework for future studies of their origin and function

Species Genes Nucleotide Amino acid
p-D SE p-D SE
Utterbackia peninsularis vs U. imbecillis
  F-ORF vs. H-ORF1 0.338 0.034 0.691 0.055
F-ORF vs. H-ORF2 0.310 0.032 0.721 0.054
F-ORF vs. H-ORF3 0.343 0.031 0.743 0.051
F-ORF vs. H-ORF4 0.335 0.034 0.729 0.054
F-ORF vs. H-ORF5 0.333 0.031 0.714 0.052
F-ORF vs. H-ORF6 0.333 0.031 0.714 0.052
F-ORF vs. H-ORF7 0.310 0.030 0.739 0.055
Mean 0.329 0.030 0.722 0.052
F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-1 0.547 0.012 0.020 0.006
F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-2 0.547 0.012 0.020 0.006
Mean 0.547 0.0012 0.020 0.006
Margaritifera margaritifera vs M. falcata
  F-ORF vs. H-ORF1 0.339 0.025 0.491 0.048
F-ORF vs. H-ORF2 0.336 0.026 0.491 0.049
F-ORF vs. H-ORF3 0.358 0.024 0.491 0.049
F-ORF vs. H-ORF4 0.336 0.026 0.491 0.049
Mean 0.342 0.025 0.491 0.049
F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-1 0.469 0.022 0.000 0.000
F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-2 0.469 0.021 0.000 0.000
Mean 0.469 0.021 0.000 0.000
Lasmigona complanata vs L. compressa
  F-ORF vs. H-ORF1 0.218 0.028 0.394 0.059
F-ORF vs. H-ORF2 0.255 0.027 0.395 0.055
Mean 0.237 0.027 0.395 0.057
Lasmigona complanata vs L. subviridis
  F-ORF vs. H-ORF1 0.269 0.029 0.429 0.054
F-ORF vs. H-ORF2 0.295 0.029 0.442 0.055
Mean 0.282 0.029 0.436 0.054
Toxolasma lividus vs T. parvum F-ORF vs. H-ORF 0.443 0.027 0.736 0.044
  1. Note: Bold numbers indicate mean values