Skip to main content

Table 4 p-distances (p-D) and standard error (SE) values of mitochondrial F-orfs vs H-orfs and Fcox1 vs Hcox1 in comparisons between gonochoric vs. closely related hermaphroditic freshwater mussel species

From: In silico analyses of mitochondrial ORFans in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) provide a framework for future studies of their origin and function

Species

Genes

Nucleotide

Amino acid

p-D

SE

p-D

SE

Utterbackia peninsularis vs U. imbecillis

 

F-ORF vs. H-ORF1

0.338

0.034

0.691

0.055

F-ORF vs. H-ORF2

0.310

0.032

0.721

0.054

F-ORF vs. H-ORF3

0.343

0.031

0.743

0.051

F-ORF vs. H-ORF4

0.335

0.034

0.729

0.054

F-ORF vs. H-ORF5

0.333

0.031

0.714

0.052

F-ORF vs. H-ORF6

0.333

0.031

0.714

0.052

F-ORF vs. H-ORF7

0.310

0.030

0.739

0.055

Mean

0.329

0.030

0.722

0.052

F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-1

0.547

0.012

0.020

0.006

F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-2

0.547

0.012

0.020

0.006

Mean

0.547

0.0012

0.020

0.006

Margaritifera margaritifera vs M. falcata

 

F-ORF vs. H-ORF1

0.339

0.025

0.491

0.048

F-ORF vs. H-ORF2

0.336

0.026

0.491

0.049

F-ORF vs. H-ORF3

0.358

0.024

0.491

0.049

F-ORF vs. H-ORF4

0.336

0.026

0.491

0.049

Mean

0.342

0.025

0.491

0.049

F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-1

0.469

0.022

0.000

0.000

F-COX1 vs. H-COX1-2

0.469

0.021

0.000

0.000

Mean

0.469

0.021

0.000

0.000

Lasmigona complanata vs L. compressa

 

F-ORF vs. H-ORF1

0.218

0.028

0.394

0.059

F-ORF vs. H-ORF2

0.255

0.027

0.395

0.055

Mean

0.237

0.027

0.395

0.057

Lasmigona complanata vs L. subviridis

 

F-ORF vs. H-ORF1

0.269

0.029

0.429

0.054

F-ORF vs. H-ORF2

0.295

0.029

0.442

0.055

Mean

0.282

0.029

0.436

0.054

Toxolasma lividus vs T. parvum

F-ORF vs. H-ORF

0.443

0.027

0.736

0.044

  1. Note: Bold numbers indicate mean values