Co-activator candidate interactions for orphan nuclear receptor NR2E1
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 March 2016
Accepted: 18 October 2016
Published: 26 October 2016
NR2E1 (Tlx) is an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates the maintenance and self-renewal of neural stem cells, and promotes tumourigenesis. Nr2e1-null mice exhibit reduced cortical and limbic structures and pronounced retinal dystrophy. NR2E1 functions mainly as a repressor of gene transcription in association with the co-repressors atrophin-1, LSD1, HDAC and BCL11A. Recent evidence suggests that NR2E1 also acts as an activator of gene transcription. However, co-activator complexes that interact with NR2E1 have not yet been identified. In order to find potential novel co-regulators for NR2E1, we used a microarray assay for real-time analysis of co-regulator–nuclear receptor interaction (MARCoNI) that contains peptides representing interaction motifs from potential co-regulatory proteins, including known co-activator nuclear receptor box sequences (LxxLL motif).
We found that NR2E1 binds strongly to an atrophin-1 peptide (Atro box) used as positive control and to 19 other peptides that constitute candidate NR2E1 partners. Two of these proteins, p300 and androgen receptor (AR), were further validated by reciprocal pull-down assays. The specificity of NR2E1 binding to peptides in the array was evaluated using two single amino acid variants, R274G and R276Q, which disrupted the majority of the binding interactions observed with wild-type NR2E1. The decreased binding affinity of these variants to co-regulators was further validated by pull-down assays using atrophin1 as bait. Despite the high conservation of arginine 274 in vertebrates, its reduced interactions with co-regulators were not significant in vivo as determined by retinal phenotype analysis in single-copy Nr2e1-null mice carrying the variant R274G.
We showed that MARCoNI is a specific assay to test interactions of NR2E1 with candidate co-regulators. In this way, we unveiled 19 potential co-regulator partners for NR2E1, including eight co-activators. All the candidates here identified need to be further validated using in vitro and in vivo models. This assay was sensitive to point mutations in NR2E1 ligand binding domain making it useful to identify mutations and/or small molecules that alter binding of NR2E1 to protein partners.
NR2E1 (Tlx) is an orphan nuclear receptor that regulates neural stem cell maintenance and self-renewal [1, 2] and promotes tumourigenesis [3, 4]. NR2E1 is crucial for adult stem cell proliferation  and plays an important role in spatial learning through promoting hippocampal neurogenesis . Nr2e1-null mice are highly aggressive, have reduced cortical thickness and limbic structures , and display aberrant retinal development [8–10]. However, despite increased understanding regarding NR2E1 biological function and its gene targets [1, 11, 12] over the past few years, its precise molecular mechanism of action remains poorly understood.
Nuclear receptors interact with multi-protein co-activator or co-repressor complexes to activate or repress transcription, respectively. These co-regulator complexes have histone modification and chromatin remodeling functions that elicit transcriptional control. Many co-regulators interact with the hydrophobic groove of nuclear receptors through specific motifs. Co-repressors use the consensus amino acid sequence LxxxIxxxL or co-repressor nuclear receptor (CoRNR) box motif , while co-activators utilize an LxxLL binding motif, also called the nuclear receptor box .
NR2E1 functions mainly as a repressor of gene transcription and interacts with the co-repressors atrophin-1 (ATN1) , histone demethylase 1 (LSD1) , histone deacetylases (HDACs) 3, 5 and 7 , and the oncoprotein BCL11A . In addition, NR2E1 can act as an activator of gene transcription by binding to the promoters of Wnt7a , and Mash1 . Despite all this knowledge, the composition and dynamics of the co-repressor complexes formed by NR2E1 are not well understood and, to date, no co-activator proteins have been found to interact with NR2E1. The crystal structure of NR2E1 in complex with a short sequence from atrophins (Atro box) was recently resolved showing that the autorepressed conformation of NR2E1 creates a pocket to recruit atrophins, which bind to NR2E1 through an unconventional sequence: ALxxLxxY .
To test whether NR2E1 could also bind to co-activators, we used a microarray assay for real-time analysis of co-regulator–nuclear receptor interaction (MARCoNI)  containing peptides representing co-regulator interacting sequences for which the LxxLL motif was highly enriched. Although many different approaches to characterize protein-protein interactions have been developed including far-western, yeast-two-hybrid, electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs), and affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry, the MARCoNI array has the advantages of being high-throughput and allowing for rapid testing of small molecules or mutants that could affect the interaction of a nuclear receptor with its protein partners.
We confirmed the specificity of binding of NR2E1 to peptides in the array by using two single-point variants in the ligand binding domain: R274G and R276Q. We also evaluated whether R274G had an overt effect on retinal development in a mouse model carrying this variant as a single copy insertion.
To find novel transcriptional co-regulators that interact with NR2E1, we incubated the N-terminal FLAG-tagged ligand-binding domain (FLAG-NR2E1LBD) with peptides of a microarray assay for real-time analysis of co-regulator–nuclear receptor interaction (MARCoNI) (PamGene International). This array contained 154 peptides from 64 co-regulator proteins. Many of these peptides harbored the LxxLL motif. Since the array did not contain any previously known direct interactors for NR2E1, we added a peptide from atrophin-1 as a positive control. This peptide is referred to as the Atro box and is comprised of 16 amino acids that are highly conserved among atrophins and found to be necessary for the interaction between NR2E1 and atrophin-1 . Two additional amino acids on each side were included for stability in the array (PYADTPALRQLSEYARPHVAFS). Mutations in the two leucines of the Atro box to alanines (PYADTPAARQASEYARPHVAFS) abolish the interaction between Drosophila Atro and NR2E1 in yeast-two-hybrid assays . Therefore, we included an Atro box containing these two leucine to-alanine substitutions as a negative control.
Some of the peptides that interacted with FLAG-NR2ELBD in the array are cofactors known to function primarily in co-activator complexes. These include the SRC family members NCOA1 (SRC-1), NCOA2 (SRC-2) and NCOA3 (SRC-3) ; the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling protein, Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 9 (CHD9) ; Proline-Rich Nuclear Receptor Coactivator (PNRC1) ; Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma, Coactivator-Related (PPRC1) ; the scaffold Transformation/Transcription Domain-Associated Protein (TRRAP)  and the histone acetyltransferase P300  (Fig. 2).
Other proteins that showed significant binding to FLAG-NR2ELBD in the array are known to be primarily part of co-repressor complexes. These include the cell-cycle checkpoint protein human homolog of RAD9 ; the NR2E3 co-repressor and RNA helicase DHX30 (RetCoR) ; the HDAC-associated protein NCOR2 (SMRT) ; and Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (NRIP1; RIP140) . Interestingly, we found that six out of 14 NRIP1-derived peptides representing different motifs in the array showed significant interaction with FLAG-NR2ELBD (Fig. 2).
We also observed that other co-regulators that can act as either co-activators or co-repressors are also targets in the array. These proteins are Proline, Glutamate and Leucine Rich Protein 1 (PELP1) ; the Histone methyltransferase Nuclear Receptor Binding SET Domain Protein 1 (NSD1) , and Tripartite Motif Containing 24 (TIF1A)  (Fig. 2).
In addition, transcription factors such as Prospero Homeobox 1 (PROX1) and androgen receptor (AR) also interacted with FLAG-NR2ELBD in the array (Fig. 2). PROX1 functions as a co-regulator through LxxLL motifs  and AR harbors LxxLL-like motifs .
Other proteins that are sufficient to inhibit transcription factors were also candidate partners for NR2E1. These include P21 Protein (Cdc42/Rac)-Activated Kinase 6 (PAK6), which phosphorylates AR and inhibits its transcriptional activity ; and Nuclear Factor of Kappa Light Polypeptide Gene Enhancer in B-Cells (IKBB), that inhibits NF-kappa-B by sequestering it in the cytoplasm  (Fig. 2).
In this study, we used a peptide array to find novel interactors for NR2E1 that revealed 19 candidate co-regulator proteins. We also found two single amino-acid variants of NR2E1 that disrupted its binding to most co-regulators and that one of them, R274G, did not have an overt physiological significance in the retina. Our results identify putative co-regulators that can interact with NR2E1.
Proteins interact through domains, many of which bind to short peptide sequences . Although the peptides in the array represent some of these short linear sequences, they lack the context of the full protein and thus may participate in non-specific interactions. To evaluate the specificity of the array and the appropriateness of this approach, we used as a positive control the Atro box, and as a negative internal control the mutated Atro box. We also used the FLAG-NR2E1LBD single amino-acid variants R274G and R276Q as experimental negative controls. We observed strong binding of NR2E1 to the wild-type Atro box and decreased binding to the mutated Atro box. Furthermore, we observed that FLAG-NR2E1LBD R274G and R276Q failed to interact with most of the NR2E1 putative interactors in the array suggesting that these variants generated a conformational change in NR2E1 that prevented its binding to other proteins. This hypothesis was further strengthened in pull-down assays using atrophin-1 as bait where both NR2E1 variants interacted with atrophin-1 with much less affinity than with wild-type. Together, these data suggest that the binding of NR2E1 to the interactors in the array was specific.
Importantly, we noted that the binding of NR2E1 to other peptides in the array was weaker than the binding observed for atrophin-1, a known direct NR2E1 interactor. This could be due to the fact that the interaction of NR2E1 to the other peptides in the array is more transient or indirect.
Our results then suggest that NR2E1 uses different co-regulator complexes to affect neural precursor behavior. For example, mouse Prox1, an interactor of NR2E1 in the array, has a role in controlling the balance between neural progenitor self-renewal and neuronal differentiation by inhibiting Notch1 expression . Interestingly, the expression of the Prox1 homolog in Drosophila, prospero, is regulated by the homolog of NR2E1, Tlx , suggesting a role for NR2E1 in controlling PROX1 biological output. Another interactor in the array that is also a neural precursor-related protein is DHX30 (RetCoR), which is important for mediating NR2E3 repressor function in retinal progenitor cells .
An intriguing co-repressor target is NRIP1 that had 14 motifs in the array, out of which six interacted with NR2E1. NRIP1 is expressed in the brain including the neurogenic region of the dentate gyrus , but its role in neurogenesis, if any, is unknown and worth exploring.
Interestingly, three co-activators members of the SRC family (SRC-1, SRC-2 and SRC-3) were found to interact with NR2E1 in the array. Although it is unknown whether they have a role in neural stem cell behavior, there is some evidence that SRC-1 could be involved in neurogenesis as it is upregulated during neuronal differentiation in vitro .
Two important scaffolds of multi-protein co-activator complexes, TRRAP and P300, also interacted with NR2E1 in the array. TRRAP is found mutated in patients with schizophrenia  and controls the tumourigenicity of brain tumour initiating cells which resemble neural stem cells . In the brain, P300 mediates the induction of the astrocyte lineage  and works with the transcription factor Zfp521 to directly activate early neural genes . Understanding the biological importance of the interaction of these adaptor proteins with NR2E1 would greatly advance our knowledge of NR2E1 mechanisms of action.
Many nuclear receptors have been shown to cooperate to regulate gene transcription. It is an interesting possibility that AR and NR2E1 could function in a complex to synergistically regulate adult neurogenesis where testosterone plays a role [42, 43]. In addition, this interaction could be important during the development of prostate cancer where NR2E1 has been shown to have an oncogenic function .
Importantly, we successfully pulled-down P300 and AR with GST-NR2E1, thus reproducing by an orthogonal experiment the results from the array. This strongly suggests that the array is a reliable tool to identify novel nuclear receptor interactors.
Intriguingly, the variant R274G did not have an effect on retinal development in vivo. Since we observed decreased binding of R274G to atrophin-1 in two orthogonal approaches, we suggest that NR2E1 protein conformation was indeed compromised by this arginine-to-glycine substitution. It is possible that the interactions detected in this study are not functional during gross retinal development or that there may have been a compensatory mechanism such as upregulation of NR2E1 or some of its co-regulators to compensate for the lower affinity of NR2E1 towards its protein partners. Alternatively, since we only used the ligand binding domain of NR2E1 in the array whereas our mouse strains express the full length protein (wild-type or variant), it is possible that the NR2E1-co-regulator complexes are more stable in the full length conformation. In this way, some co-regulators could bind to NR2E1 through both its LBD and DBD as is the case for LSD1 . It is also possible that variant R274G could have an effect on brain development. However, we could not assess this phenotype as the BAC we use in this study does not completely rescue the brain abnormalities observed in Nr2e −/− .
The mouse model harboring the variant R274G validates again the usefulness of our cloning strategy showing that a single-copy human gene incorporated into the Hprt locus is functional. This strategy could be useful to study human mutations in the regulatory or coding regions of disease-causing genes.
Similar to COUP-TFII, which can be activated by retinoic acids despite its autorepressed conformation , NR2E1 can be regulated by artificial ligands . Therefore, a peptide array could represent a rapid screening tool for small molecules that modify the ability of NR2E1 to bind co-regulators.
By using a highly specific peptide array, we uncovered novel putative interactors for NR2E1 including the co-activator P300 and the nuclear receptor AR. Future experiments will aim to validate the interactions here discovered and understand their biological significance. This array could be used to test small molecules and mutations that may alter the interaction of NR2E1 with co-regulators and therefore its transcriptional function.
Microarray assay for real-time analysis of co-regulator–nuclear receptor interaction (MARCoNI)
The peptide array assay was performed on Nuclear Receptor PamChip Arrays (PamGene International, B.V., Den Bosch, the Netherlands) harboring 154 immobilized peptides corresponding to co-regulator-derived NR interaction motifs (#88101; PamGene International) as described before . We added a peptide from Drosophila atrophin-1, called the Atro box (PYADTPALRQLSEYARPHVAFS) as a positive control and a mutant Atro box in which two leucines were substituted with alanines (PYADTPAARQASEYARPHVAFS) as a negative control . Briefly, lysates were prepared from HEK293 cells transfected with the human NR2E1 ligand binding domain FLAG-tagged at the N-terminus (FLAG-NR2E1LBD), wild-type or containing the variants R274G or R276Q as described below. The concentration of FLAG-NR2E1LBD in the lysates was assessed by western blot and the quantities of each sample were adjusted such that equal amounts of NR2E1 proteins were added to the array. Sample IDs were randomly assigned to allow for a blinded experiment. Anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody-FITC conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, #F4049) at 1.1 mg/ml was added to the lysates to detect the overexpressed proteins.
The arrays were incubated with 25 μL blocking buffer (TBS with 1 % BSA, 0.01 %, Tween-20, and 0.3 % skimmed milk) for 20 cycles. Subsequently, each array was incubated with 7–10 μL of assay mix (TBS with 0.2 % BSA, 0.05 % Tween-20, 50 μM DTT, 2 % DMSO, 25 nM anti-Flag-FITC) for 120 cycles (30 s/cycle) and washed with 25 μL TBS. After washing an additional detection step was performed with 54 nM goat anti mouse FITC (Santa Cruz #SC-2010, 200 μg/ml) for 20 cycles and washed with 25 μl TBS. At cycle 163, a TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) image was captured by the CCD camera. Image analysis was performed by automated spot finding and quantification using BioNavigator software (PamGene International BV) as described before . The background was discounted from the spot signal. Each immobilized peptide was quantitatively assessed for abundance, using Syproruby staining, and functionality, using a standard glucocorticoid receptor MARCoNI assay, which measures dexamethasone-induced modulation. Three technical replicates were performed.
Plasmid constructs and site-directed mutagenesis
To make FLAG-NR2E1LBD, the NR2E1 ligand binding domain (LBD) was cloned into the pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, CA, USA) using EcoRI and NotI enzymes (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The EGFP coding region was replaced with NR2E1 LBD that was either wild-type or that contained the R274G or R276Q amino-acid changes. The NR2E1 LBD was amplified using the primers: forward 5′-ATATGAATTCACCATGGACTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGTGTCCACCACTCCAGAGCGGC-3′ and reverse 5′-ATATGGATCCTTAGATATCACTGGATTTGTAC-3′. The forward primer also contained the FLAG-tag coding sequence.
Site directed mutagenesis was performed with the Quik-Change® Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, CA, USA) on wild-type NR2E1 according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primers used were forward 5′-GAGGTGGTGGCTCGATTTCAACAACTCCGGTTAGATGC-3′ and reverse 5′-GCATCTAACCGGAGTTGTTGAAATCGAGCCACCACCTC-3′ for R274G; and forward 5′-GCTTTACAAGAGGTGGTGGCTGGATTTAGACAACTCC-3′ and reverse 5′-GGAGTTGTCTAAATCCAGCCACCACCACTTGTAAAGC-3′ for R276Q.
GST-NR2E1 was generated by cloning full-length NR2E1 into pGEX-2 T vector (Clontech, CA, USA) using BamHI and EcoRI enzymes (Invitrogen, CA, USA). NR2E1 cDNA was amplified using the following primers: forward 5′-ATATGGATCCGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAGGAATGAGCAAGCCAGCC-3′ and reverse 5′-ATATGAATTCTTAGATATCACTGGATTTGTAC-3′.
pEGFP-C1-AR (Deposited by Michael Mancini , Plasmid #28235), pCMVβ-p300-myc (Deposited by Tso-Pang Yao, Plasmid #30489), and pcDNA4 myc-PGC-1 alpha (Deposited by Toren Finkel , Plasmid #10974) were purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA, USA). The GST human -Arophin-1846–1191 construct was kindly donated by Dr. Chih-Cheng Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA).
Protein expression and protein lysates preparation
One Shot® BL21 Star™ (DE3) Chemically Competent E. coli (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were transformed with GST-atrophin-1 or GST-NR2E1 constructs. Subsequently, a bacterial colony was grown in 10 mL of LB media containing 100 μg/mL Ampicillin overnight. Five μL of the overnight culture were added to 100 mL of LB (1:50 dilution) containing 100 μg/mL Ampicillin and grown to reach an OD600 of 0.5 (mid-log). Bacteria were induced with 0.1 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37 °C. Bacteria were pelleted at 7,000x g for 7 min, washed with STE buffer (10 mM Tris pH8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA) and resuspended in STE buffer containing protease inhibitors (Roche, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and 100 μg/mL of lysozyme. Cells were incubated 15 min on ice and DTT was added to a final concentration of 5 mM. Subsequently, Sarkosyl was added to a final concentration of 0.2 %, and lysates were vortexed and sonicated on iced twice for 15 s each. Lysates were adjusted to 1 % Triton X-100 and centrifuged at 20,000x g for 15 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and used in subsequent experiments.
To express FLAG-NR2E1LBD variants, HEK293 cells were grown in T-75 flasks and transfected with each of the different constructs. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in ice-cold solubilization buffer [20 mM Tris HCl, pH8.0, 1 % NP40, 10 % glycerol, and 137 mM NaCl] with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cells were sonicated for 10 s and centrifuged at 20,000x g for 10 min at 4 °C.
Bacterial lysates were incubated with glutathione MagBeads (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) for one hour. Beads were then washed twice with PBS and incubated in 1 % BSA/PBS for one additional hour. HEK293 lysates were adjusted to 0.1 % BSA and incubated with the beads for two hours at 4 °C. Beads were washed three times for 30 min before adding 50 μL of loading buffer. SDS-Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed with the final sample from the beads and 3 % of recovered input. For immunoprecipitation experiments, HEK293 lysates were precleared with protein A beads for 1 h and added to beads-antibody conjugates for an additional hour. After removing the supernatant, the second HEK293 lysate expressing the candidate interactor was added for 2 h. Beads were washed four times with solubilization buffer before proceeding to SDS-PAGE. Antibodies used were rabbit anti-P300 (Sydlabs, Natick, MA, USA), rabbit anti-EGFP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), rabbit anti-Myc and rabbit anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Samples containing 1X loading buffer were incubated at 75 °C for 10 min and loaded into NuPAGE® Novex Bis-Tris Gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Gels were run for 30–45 min at 150 V. Subsequently transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes was performed for 90 min at 30 V. After transfer, membranes were washed and incubated in blocking solution (5 % milk in Tween-20-TBS) for one hour. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Antibodies used were rabbit anti-P300 (Sydlabs, Natick, MA, USA), rabbit anti-EGFP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), rat anti-GST, rabbit anti-Myc, and rabbit anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After three washes of 10 min each, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. After three subsequent washes, the membrane was incubated with Pierce™ ECL Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Rockville, MD, USA) and exposed to Fuji Rx film.
Mouse strains husbandry and breeding
B6.129P2(Cg)-Hprt tm330(NR2E1,bEMS112)Ems mice were generated from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (clone mEMS4738) that harbored the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) bEMS112 (containing variant R274G) knock-in allele at the mouse Hprt locus, as previously described [47, 48]. Only male mice were studied to avoid variability due to random X inactivation of the knock-in allele at Hprt. Experimental animals for studying NR2E1 BAC bEMS112 were generated through a breeding strategy described before . Briefly, B6 (C57BL/6 J) females heterozygous for the BAC insert (N > 10) and for the fierce deletion (B6.Cg-Hprt tm85(NR2E1,bEMS112)Ems /X, Nr2e1 frc/+ ) were crossed to 129 (129S1/SvImJ) males heterozygous for the fierce mutation (129S1/SvImJ.Cg-Nr2e1 frc/+ ) (N > 10). This produced first-generation hybrid offspring (B6129F1), abbreviated here as Nr2e1 +/+ ; Nr2e1 frc/+ ; Nr2e1 frc/frc ; Nr2e1 +/+ , NR2E1; Nr2e1 frc/+ , NR2E1; Nr2e1 frc/frc , NR2E1; Nr2e1 +/+ , R274G; Nr2e1 frc/+ , R274G; and Nr2e1 frc/frc , R274G. Mice were kept in a pathogen-free animal facility at the Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics (Vancouver, BC, Canada) on an 6 am to 8 pm light cycle at 20 ± 2 °C with 50 % ± 5 % relative humidity, and food and water ad libitum.
To assess the number of retinal blood vessels, funduscopy was performed using a Kowa Genesis small animal fundus camera (Pacific Medical, Delta, BC, Canada) as previously described [47, 61]. In short, eyes were dilated with 1 % atropine/PBS and photographed after 30 min. Animals were manually restrained without sedation.
Eyes were dissected, washed once in PBS and incubated overnight in Davidson’s fixative. Eyes were stored in 70 % ethanol until paraffin embedment. Eyes were sectioned at 5 μm and mounted on SuperFrost Plus slides. To evaluate retinal thickness, eyes were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining. Briefly, tissue was incubated in hematoxylin for 5 min, washed in tap water and incubated in 1 % lithium carbonate solution for 30 s. After washing in tap water again, the tissue was incubated in acid alcohol (1 %) for 5 s followed by another tap water wash and incubation in eosin Y solution for 5 min. After a final tap water wash, tissue was dehydrated in a gradient series of ethanol and xylene before mounting for microscopy. Retinal sections were chosen such that they contained the optic nerve and retinal thickness was measured 600 μm away from the optic nerve using the software ImageJ . One section per eye and two eyes per animal were studied. Retinal sections were imaged with the Olympus BX61 motorized microscope using the software DP Controller (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis was performed using the software XLSTAT. T-test was used to calculate differences between groups. False discovery rate (FDR) q-values were calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to correct for multiple hypothesis testing . A comparison between signal intensities in the western blot was performed by one-way ANOVA.
This work was supported by a Sharon Stewart Aniridia Research Award [grant number 20R64586] and Sharon Stewart Aniridia Trust [grant number 20R67715] to EMS, and a CFRI Partnership Graduate Studentship award to XCD. We thank Dr. Chih-Cheng Tsai (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA) for contributing the GST-atrophin-1 construct.
Availability of data and materials
All supporting data are included as additional supplementary files.
R. Houtman and D. Melchers are employed by PamGene International BV, Den Bosch, the Netherlands. The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
EMS conceived the study. EMS and XCD participated in the study design. CDL generated NR2E1 wild-type construct and contributed to statistical analysis. VA and XCD performed pull-down experiments. BKW did site-directed mutagenesis and contributed to Atro-box peptide design for the array. RH and DM performed MARCoNI experiments. XCD performed all other experiments. XCD drafted the paper with help from EMS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
All procedures involving animals were in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) and UBC Animal Care Committee (ACC) (Protocol numbers A07-0435 and A11-0370).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Qu Q, Sun G, Li W, Yang S, Ye P, Zhao C, Yu RT, Gage FH, Evans RM, Shi Y. Orphan nuclear receptor TLX activates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling to stimulate neural stem cell proliferation and self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:31–40. sup pp 31–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun G, Yu RT, Evans RM, Shi Y. Orphan nuclear receptor TLX recruits histone deacetylases to repress transcription and regulate neural stem cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15282–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu HK, Wang Y, Belz T, Bock D, Takacs A, Radlwimmer B, Barbus S, Reifenberger G, Lichter P, Schutz G. The nuclear receptor tailless induces long-term neural stem cell expansion and brain tumor initiation. Genes Dev. 2010;24:683–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu D, Yu S, Jia L, Zou C, Xu Z, Xiao L, Wong KB, Ng CF, Chan FL. Orphan nuclear receptor TLX functions as a potent suppressor of oncogene-induced senescence in prostate cancer via its transcriptional co-regulation of the CDKN1A (p21(WAF1) (/) (CIP1)) and SIRT1 genes. J Pathol. 2015;236:103–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niu W, Zou Y, Shen C, Zhang CL. Activation of postnatal neural stem cells requires nuclear receptor TLX. J Neurosci. 2011;31:13816–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang CL, Zou Y, He W, Gage FH, Evans RM. A role for adult TLX-positive neural stem cells in learning and behaviour. Nature. 2008;451:1004–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy K, Thiels E, Monaghan AP. Loss of the tailless gene affects forebrain development and emotional behavior. Physiol Behav. 2002;77:595–600.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Corso-Diaz X, Simpson EM. Nr2e1 regulates retinal lamination and the development of Muller glia, S-cones, and glycineric amacrine cells during retinogenesis. Mol Brain. 2015;8:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miyawaki T, Uemura A, Dezawa M, Yu RT, Ide C, Nishikawa S, Honda Y, Tanabe Y, Tanabe T. Tlx, an orphan nuclear receptor, regulates cell numbers and astrocyte development in the developing retina. J Neurosci. 2004;24:8124–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young KA, Berry ML, Mahaffey CL, Saionz JR, Hawes NL, Chang B, Zheng QY, Smith RS, Bronson RT, Nelson RJ, et al. Fierce: a new mouse deletion of Nr2e1; violent behaviour and ocular abnormalities are background-dependent. Behav Brain Res. 2002;132:145–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schmouth JF, Arenillas D, Corso-Diaz X, Xie YY, Bohacec S, Banks KG, Bonaguro RJ, Wong SH, Jones SJ, Marra MA, et al. Combined serial analysis of gene expression and transcription factor binding site prediction identifies novel-candidate-target genes of Nr2e1 in neocortex development. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:545.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhang CL, Zou Y, Yu RT, Gage FH, Evans RM. Nuclear receptor TLX prevents retinal dystrophy and recruits the corepressor atrophin1. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1308–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Lazar MA. The CoRNR motif controls the recruitment of corepressors by nuclear hormone receptors. Nature. 1999;402:93–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heery DM, Kalkhoven E, Hoare S, Parker MG. A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature. 1997;387:733–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yokoyama A, Takezawa S, Schule R, Kitagawa H, Kato S. Transrepressive function of TLX requires the histone demethylase LSD1. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3995–4003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Estruch SB, Buzon V, Carbo LR, Schorova L, Luders J, Estebanez-Perpina E. The oncoprotein BCL11A binds to orphan nuclear receptor TLX and potentiates its transrepressive function. PLoS One. 2012;7, e37963.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Elmi M, Matsumoto Y, Zeng ZJ, Lakshminarasimhan P, Yang W, Uemura A, Nishikawa S, Moshiri A, Tajima N, Agren H, et al. TLX activates MASH1 for induction of neuronal lineage commitment of adult hippocampal neuroprogenitors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2010;45:121–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhi X, Zhou XE, He Y, Searose-Xu K, Zhang CL, Tsai CC, Melcher K, Xu HE. Structural basis for corepressor assembly by the orphan nuclear receptor TLX. Genes Dev. 2015;29:440–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Houtman R, Melchers D, Aarts J, Peijnenburg A, van Beuningen R, Rietjens I, Bovee TF. A 155-plex high-throughput in vitro coregulator binding assay for (anti-)estrogenicity testing evaluated with 23 reference compounds. ALTEX. 2013;30:145–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Rajan H, Pitman JL, McKeown M, Tsai CC. Histone deacetylase-associating Atrophin proteins are nuclear receptor corepressors. Genes Dev. 2006;20:525–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Leo C, Chen JD. The SRC family of nuclear receptor coactivators. Gene. 2000;245:1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Surapureddi S, Viswakarma N, Yu S, Guo D, Rao MS, Reddy JK. PRIC320, a transcription coactivator, isolated from peroxisome proliferator-binding protein complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;343:535–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou D, Quach KM, Yang C, Lee SY, Pohajdak B, Chen S. PNRC: a proline-rich nuclear receptor coregulatory protein that modulates transcriptional activation of multiple nuclear receptors including orphan receptors SF1 (steroidogenic factor 1) and ERRalpha1 (estrogen related receptor alpha-1). Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:986–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersson U, Scarpulla RC. Pgc-1-related coactivator, a novel, serum-inducible coactivator of nuclear respiratory factor 1-dependent transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:3738–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McMahon SB, Van Buskirk HA, Dugan KA, Copeland TD, Cole MD. The novel ATM-related protein TRRAP is an essential cofactor for the c-Myc and E2F oncoproteins. Cell. 1998;94:363–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodman RH, Smolik S. CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1553–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bessho T, Sancar A. Human DNA damage checkpoint protein hRAD9 is a 3' to 5' exonuclease. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:7451–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takezawa S, Yokoyama A, Okada M, Fujiki R, Iriyama A, Yanagi Y, Ito H, Takada I, Kishimoto M, Miyajima A, et al. A cell cycle-dependent co-repressor mediates photoreceptor cell-specific nuclear receptor function. EMBO J. 2007;26:764–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chen JD, Evans RM. A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature. 1995;377:454–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavailles V, Dauvois S, L'Horset F, Lopez G, Hoare S, Kushner PJ, Parker MG. Nuclear factor RIP140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. EMBO J. 1995;14:3741–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vadlamudi RK, Wang RA, Mazumdar A, Kim Y, Shin J, Sahin A, Kumar R. Molecular cloning and characterization of PELP1, a novel human coregulator of estrogen receptor alpha. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:38272–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurotaki N, Harada N, Yoshiura K, Sugano S, Niikawa N, Matsumoto N. Molecular characterization of NSD1, a human homologue of the mouse Nsd1 gene. Gene. 2001;279:197–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kikuchi M, Okumura F, Tsukiyama T, Watanabe M, Miyajima N, Tanaka J, Imamura M, Hatakeyama S. TRIM24 mediates ligand-dependent activation of androgen receptor and is repressed by a bromodomain-containing protein, BRD7, in prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:1828–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song KH, Li T, Chiang JY. A Prospero-related homeodomain protein is a novel co-regulator of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha that regulates the cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:10081–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- He B, Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM. FXXLF and WXXLF sequences mediate the NH2-terminal interaction with the ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:22986–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu T, Li Y, Gu H, Zhu G, Li J, Cao L, Li F. p21-Activated kinase 6 (PAK6) inhibits prostate cancer growth via phosphorylation of androgen receptor and tumorigenic E3 ligase murine double minute-2 (Mdm2). J Biol Chem. 2013;288:3359–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercurio F, Zhu H, Murray BW, Shevchenko A, Bennett BL, Li J, Young DB, Barbosa M, Mann M, Manning A, et al. IKK-1 and IKK-2: cytokine-activated IkappaB kinases essential for NF-kappaB activation. Science. 1997;278:860–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corso-Diaz X, Borrie AE, Bonaguro R, Schuetz JM, Rosenberg T, Jensen H, Brooks BP, Macdonald IM, Pasutto F, Walter MA, et al. Absence of NR2E1 mutations in patients with aniridia. Mol Vis. 2012;18:2770–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kanda A, Swaroop A. A comprehensive analysis of sequence variants and putative disease-causing mutations in photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2174–84.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Haider NB, Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, Swiderski R, Streb LM, Searby C, Beck G, Hockey R, Hanna DB, Gorman S, et al. Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate. Nat Genet. 2000;24:127–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JM, Konkle AT, Zup SL, McCarthy MM. Impact of sex and hormones on new cells in the developing rat hippocampus: a novel source of sex dimorphism? Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:791–800.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brannvall K, Bogdanovic N, Korhonen L, Lindholm D. 19-Nortestosterone influences neural stem cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the rat brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:871–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamoto M, Hojo Y, Inoue K, Matsui T, Kawato S, McEwen BS, Soya H. Mild exercise increases dihydrotestosterone in hippocampus providing evidence for androgenic mediation of neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13100–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Askew EB, Bai S, Hnat AT, Minges JT, Wilson EM. Melanoma antigen gene protein-A11 (MAGE-11) F-box links the androgen receptor NH2-terminal transactivation domain to p160 coactivators. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:34793–808.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kamiya D, Banno S, Sasai N, Ohgushi M, Inomata H, Watanabe K, Kawada M, Yakura R, Kiyonari H, Nakao K, et al. Intrinsic transition of embryonic stem-cell differentiation into neural progenitors. Nature. 2011;470:503–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima K, Yanagisawa M, Arakawa H, Kimura N, Hisatsune T, Kawabata M, Miyazono K, Taga T. Synergistic signaling in fetal brain by STAT3-Smad1 complex bridged by p300. Science. 1999;284:479–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmouth JF, Banks KG, Mathelier A, Gregory-Evans CY, Castellarin M, Holt RA, Gregory-Evans K, Wasserman WW, Simpson EM. Retina restored and brain abnormalities ameliorated by single-copy knock-in of human NR2E1 in null mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:1296–311.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schmouth JF, Bonaguro RJ, Corso-Diaz X, Simpson EM. Modelling human regulatory variation in mouse: finding the function in genome-wide association studies and whole-genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2012;8, e1002544.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Castagnoli L, Costantini A, Dall'Armi C, Gonfloni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Panni S, Paoluzi S, Santonico E, Cesareni G. Selectivity and promiscuity in the interaction network mediated by protein recognition modules. FEBS Lett. 2004;567:74–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaltezioti V, Kouroupi G, Oikonomaki M, Mantouvalou E, Stergiopoulos A, Charonis A, Rohrer H, Matsas R, Politis PK. Prox1 regulates the notch1-mediated inhibition of neurogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2010;8, e1000565.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kurusu M, Maruyama Y, Adachi Y, Okabe M, Suzuki E, Furukubo-Tokunaga K. A conserved nuclear receptor, Tailless, is required for efficient proliferation and prolonged maintenance of mushroom body progenitors in the Drosophila brain. Dev Biol. 2009;326:224–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duclot F, Lapierre M, Fritsch S, White R, Parker MG, Maurice T, Cavailles V. Cognitive impairments in adult mice with constitutive inactivation of RIP140 gene expression. Genes Brain Behav. 2012;11:69–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishihara E, Moriya T, Shinohara K. Expression of steroid receptor coactivator-1 is elevated during neuronal differentiation of murine neural stem cells. Brain Res. 2007;1135:22–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu B, Ionita-Laza I, Roos JL, Boone B, Woodrick S, Sun Y, Levy S, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M. De novo gene mutations highlight patterns of genetic and neural complexity in schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1365–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wurdak H, Zhu S, Romero A, Lorger M, Watson J, Chiang CY, Zhang J, Natu VS, Lairson LL, Walker JR, et al. An RNAi screen identifies TRRAP as a regulator of brain tumor-initiating cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:37–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruse SW, Suino-Powell K, Zhou XE, Kretschman JE, Reynolds R, Vonrhein C, Xu Y, Wang L, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, et al. Identification of COUP-TFII orphan nuclear receptor as a retinoic acid-activated receptor. PLoS Biol. 2008;6, e227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Benod C, Villagomez R, Filgueira CS, Hwang PK, Leonard PG, Poncet-Montange G, Rajagopalan S, Fletterick RJ, Gustafsson JA, Webb P. The human orphan nuclear receptor tailless (TLX, NR2E1) is druggable. PLoS One. 2014;9, e99440.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Koppen A, Houtman R, Pijnenburg D, Jeninga EH, Ruijtenbeek R, Kalkhoven E. Nuclear receptor-coregulator interaction profiling identifies TRIP3 as a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma cofactor. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:2212–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stenoien DL, Cummings CJ, Adams HP, Mancini MG, Patel K, DeMartino GN, Marcelli M, Weigel NL, Mancini MA. Polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptors form aggregates that sequester heat shock proteins, proteasome components and SRC-1, and are suppressed by the HDJ-2 chaperone. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:731–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ichida M, Nemoto S, Finkel T. Identification of a specific molecular repressor of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1alpha). J Biol Chem. 2002;277:50991–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrahams BS, Kwok MC, Trinh E, Budaghzadeh S, Hossain SM, Simpson EM. Pathological aggression in "fierce" mice corrected by human nuclear receptor 2E1. J Neurosci. 2005;25:6263–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc. 1995;57:11.Google Scholar