Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Transcriptome-wide N 6-methyladenosine methylome profiling of porcine muscle and adipose tissues reveals a potential mechanism for transcriptional regulation and differential methylation pattern

BMC Genomics volume 18, Article number: 336 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

N 6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal form of modification in messenger RNA in higher eukaryotes and potential regulatory functions of reversible m6A methylation on mRNA have been revealed by mapping of m6A methylomes in several species. m6A modification in active gene regulation manifests itself as altered methylation profiles in a tissue-specific manner or in response to changing cellular or species living environment. However, up to date, there has no data on m6A porcine transcriptome-wide map and its potential biological roles in adipose deposition and muscle growth.

Methods

In this work, we used methylated RNA immunoprecipitation with next-generation sequencing (MeRIP-Seq) technique to acquire the first ever m6A porcine transcriptome-wide map. Transcriptomes of muscle and adipose tissues from three different pig breeds, the wild boar, Landrace, and Rongchang pig, were used to generate these maps.

Results

Our findings show that there were 5,872 and 2,826 m6A peaks respectively, in the porcine muscle and adipose tissue transcriptomes. Stop codons, 3′-untranslated regions, and coding regions were found to be mainly enriched for m6A peaks. Gene ontology analysis revealed that common m6A peaks in nuclear genes are associated with transcriptional factors, suggestive of a relationship between m6A mRNA methylation and nuclear genome transcription. Some genes showed tissue- and breed-differential methylation, and have novel biological functions. We also found a relationship between the m6A methylation extent and the transcript level, suggesting a regulatory role for m6A in gene expression.

Conclusion

This comprehensive map provides a solid basis for the determination of potential functional roles for RNA m6A modification in adipose deposition and muscle growth.

Background

N 6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal form of modification in polyadenylated mRNAs and long-noncoding RNAs in higher eukaryotes, and first identified in the 1970s [1]. It is catalyzed by a multicomponent complex composed of two active methyltransferases, methyltransferase like 3 and methyltransferase like 14. These methyltransferases form a heterodimer that interacts with Wilms′ tumor 1-associating protein and substantially affects mRNA methylation in vivo, but not in vitro [2,3,4,5,6].

Two m6A RNA demethylases, fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) protein [7] and its homolog ALKBH5, which selectively reverse m6A to adenosine in nuclear RNA, have been discovered since 2011 [8]. Together with the methyltransferases, they represent the first examples of reversible and dynamic RNA modification similar to DNA and histone methylation, and are an important breakthrough towards reigniting investigations of m6A biology [9]. Human YTH domain family 2 was recently identified as the first m6A reader protein that preferentially and specifically recognizes m6A-methylated mRNA [10, 11] and mediates mRNA decay [11].

Some studies have revealed that RNA m6A plays important biological roles in the regulation of cellular metabolic processes. RNA m6A controls cell transition fate in mammalian embryonic stem cells [12], regulates pluripotency in murine stem cells [13], and shoot stem cell fate in Arabidopsis [14]. FTO-dependent demethylation of m6A regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis [15]. m6A-methylation-dependent RNA processing controls the speed of the mammalian circadian clock in mice embryonic fibroblasts [16]. m6A methylation also plays important roles in human disease, such as control of HIV-1 replication and interaction with the host immune system during HIV-1 infection of T cells [17], promoting translation of oncogenes in human lung cancer [18], and induction of breast cancer stem cell phenotype [19]. Recent studies have proved that m6A methylation modulates sex determination in Drosophila [20, 21] and promotes X-inactive specific transcript (XIST) mediated transcriptional repression in mammal [22].

Understanding the potential biological role of RNA m6A modification requires detection of m6A modification sites at the transcriptome-wide level. In 2012, Dominissini et al. [10] and Meyer et al. [23] developed a method for transcriptome-wide m6A localization, called methylated RNA immunoprecipitation with next-generation sequencing (MeRIP-Seq), and profiled the transcriptome-wide m6A distribution in humans and mice. Development of the MeRIP-Seq technique has also enabled transcriptome-wide m6A profiling of three other eukaryotic species: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa [24,25,26,27]. These studies showed that m6A is mainly localized around stop codons, 3′-untranslated regions (3′-UTRs), as well as in long internal exons and transcription start sites, suggesting that it plays a key role in the regulation of post-transcriptional gene expression. These groundbreaking studies suggest that it is possible to reveal the potential biological functions of m6A modification in other species by constructing transcriptome-wide m6A methylome maps.

m6A modification in active gene regulation manifests itself as an altered tissue-specific methylation profile. m6A modification is widely distributed in animal tissues such as liver, kidney, brain, lung, and heart, and exhibits tissue-specific regulation [10, 23]. For example, in adult mouse brain tissue, genes whose RNAs display m6A modifications are linked to neurodevelopmental and neurological disorders [10, 23]. Similarly, transcriptome-wide m6A profiling of rice callus and leaf tissues revealed the presence of tissue-specific competitors involved in selective mRNA modification. Selectively methylated genes (SMGs) in callus were mainly found to participate in transcription regulator/factor activity whereas leaf SMGs were mainly involved in plastids and thylakoids [27]. Recently, Wan et al. also found unique differential m6A methylation patterns among leaf, flower, and root tissues in Arabidopsis thaliana [26].

m6A modulation of active gene regulation at the cellular or species level also occurs in response to environmental changes. Dominissini et al. [10] detected a subset of treatment-dependent, dynamically altered peaks in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2) exposed to ultraviolet radiation, heat shock, hepatocyte growth factor, and interferon-c, although these cells exhibited markedly similar m6A profiles. Similarly, a comparative study of m6A methylation among different geographically diverse accessions of A. thaliana, including Can-0 (latitude: 29.21, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in spring: 123.7) and Hen-16 (latitude: 65.25, PAR in spring: 55.5), identified strain-specific genes with different biological functions, and also strain-specific m6A marking of mRNAs, with higher m6A levels in Can-0 than in Hen-16 [25]. These studies indicated that it is possible to reveal the potential biological roles of RNA m6A modification by comparative analysis of tissue-specific or population-specific regulation of m6A modification.

To further investigate the functions of m6A, and to facilitate future studies of mammalian m6A, we collected muscle and adipose tissues from three pig breeds with different genetic backgrounds. This enabled us to acquire the first known set of transcriptome-wide m6A profiles in pigs. We compared the patterns of m6A distribution between muscle and adipose tissues and among porcine breeds, and investigated tissue and breed generality and selectivity of methylated genes and their functional implications.

Results

Transcriptome-wide detection of m6A modification in pigs

We sampled muscle (LM) and adipose (LA) tissues from two 210-day-old Landrace (LD) sows using the MeRIP-Seq technique. To ensure the specificity of the antibody to m6A, we performed dot blot experiments to compare m6A-IP (immunoprecipitation) enrichment with control RNA (input, without IP) before sequencing. The results demonstrated that the m6A antibody selectively binds to m6A residues and exhibits negligible binding to unmodified adenosines (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We obtained more than 37,600,000 reads from each LM IP sample and more than 30,900,000 reads from each LA IP sample. After filtering out low-quality data, more than 37,400,000 high-quality reads from each LM IP sample and more than 30,600,000 high-quality reads from each LA IP sample were mapped to the Sus scrofa reference genome. More than 70% of the IP reads from both tissues uniquely mapped to the reference genome. To improve m6A peak identification, we also sequenced two input samples for each tissue simultaneously, and acquired ~24,000,000 high-quality reads related to ~16,000 genes from each LM input sample and more than 21,600,000 high-quality reads related to ~17,000 genes from each LA input sample (Additional file 2: Table S1).

For both tissues, more than 80% and 70% of the m6A peaks were consistently detected in two biological replicates of LM and LA, respectively. We regarded these recurrent peaks as highly enriched m6A peaks for further analysis. We detected 5,872 m6A recurrent peaks among 4,544 expressed genes in LM, and 2,826 m6A recurrent peaks among 2,137 expressed genes in LA (Table 1 and Fig. 1a and Additional file 3: Data S1). We used this information to estimate that the porcine transcriptome contains 0.562 m6A peaks in LM and 0.254 m6A peaks in LA per actively expressed transcript, respectively (Fig. 1b and Additional file 2: Table S2).

Table 1 Summary of m6A peaks in muscle and adipose tissues and their distribution
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Outline of the porcine m6A methylome. a Numbers of common and tissue-specific m6A peaks in the LM and LA tissues. LM and LA represent muscle and adipose tissues from Landrace pigs respectively (b) Estimation of m6A peaks density in porcine transcripts. Transcripts were divided to 11 groups based on expression levels, and the m6A density of each group was calculated separately. c Sequence motif of m6A-containing peak regions

Full size image

To determine whether our identified m6A peaks shared the conserved RRACH motif (where R represents purine, A is m6A and H is a non-guanine bas) [28, 29], we performed an unbiased search for motifs enriched in regions surrounding m6A peaks (Methods). Clustering of significantly enriched sequences perfectly recapitulated the previously established m6A RRACH consensus sequence in both tissues (Fig. 1c and Additional file 1: Figure S2). The identification of a strong consensus reinforces the authenticity of the discovered m6A peaks, and supports the existence of a predominant methylation machinery.

Distribution of m6A modification in the porcine transcriptome

To understand the preferential location of m6A in transcripts, we next investigated the metagene profiles of m6A peaks in the entire transcriptome of both tissues. We observed that m6A peaks were markedly correlated with two distinct coordinates: immediately following near the end of the 5′untranslated regions (5′UTRs) and start of the coding sequence (CDS), and near the end of the CDS and beginning of 3′untranslated region (3′UTRs) in both tissues (Fig. 2a); meanwhile, the end CDS of peaks were more pronounced than the start CDS of peaks. To assess the enrichment methodically, we assigned each m6A peak to one of six no overlapping transcript segments: 5′UTRs, start codon, CDS, stop codon, 3′UTR, and other (Fig. 2b). Most (~80%) of the m6A peaks were within genic regions, and more than 60% of genic peaks were localized near the stop codon and CDS, while ~ 30% were found in the 5′UTRs, start codons, and 3′UTRs (Fig. 2b). The topological patterns distributing within genes were highly similar in both tissues, suggesting that recognition of motif for m6A methylation was conserved among animal tissues.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of m6A methylome along porcine transcripts. a Enrichment of m6A peaks along transcripts. Each transcript is divided into three parts: 5′UTR, CDS and 3′UTR. b Transcriptome-wide distribution of m6A peaks. Bar graph denotes the percentage of m6A peaks in each of the six non-overlapping transcript elements

Full size image

m6A-containing genes are associated with transcriptional factors and involved in important biological pathways

To further determine general functional pathways that involve m6A in animal tissue development, we systematically screened these common peaks which consistently appears on both tissues (≥50% overlapping lengths) and these related common expression genes, and identified the GO terms with the help of the GO consortium database (Methods). We identified 1,957 common m6A peaks representing 1,615 expressed genes in the two tissues (Fig. 1a and Additional file 4: Data S2). GO analysis showed that the genes encoding m6A-containing RNAs are mainly enriched in the nucleus, and are involved in a variety of cellular functions including protein binding, nucleic acid binding, transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding, transcription factor activity and regulation of cellular metabolic process (Fig. 3a and Additional file 4: Data S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Functional analysis of common genes associated with m6A peaks. a Gene ontology analysis of common genes associated with m6A peaks. Gene ontology (GO) categories are maintained by the Gene Ontology Consortium and P values are calculated using the DAVID tool. b Percentages of subgroups of genes divided by the localization pattern of m6A peaks. c Percentages of nucleus-related genes in each subgroup. d Examples of nucleus-related genes with m6A peaks around the stop codon

Full size image

With regards to genes associated with m6A peaks, we sought to determine if differential m6A enrichment regions are related to specific GO categories. We classified genes into four subgroups: PeakStart (m6A peaks around the start codon), PeakStop (m6A peaks around the stop codon), PeakBoth (m6A peaks around both start and stop codons) and others (Fig. 3b). We then performed GO enrichment analysis for each subgroup. All subgroups of m6A-containing genes were found to be highly enriched for cellular components related to the nucleus, while more than 48% of genes belonging to the PeakStop subgroup were enriched for nuclear components (Fig. 3c).

These findings prompted us to analyze the nucleus-related genes in the PeakStop subgroup. We found that most of these genes encode transcription factors (Additional file 5: Data S3), indicating that m6A modification is involved in transcriptional regulation. For instance, our m6A-IP data revealed one clear m6A peak around the stop codon of the cAMP responsive element-binding protein gene (CREB) and ten genes from the zinc finger protein (ZNF), including ZNF496 (Fig. 3d). CREB was first described as a cAMP-responsive transcription factor regulating the somatostatin gene in 1987 [30], while ZNF is regarded as one of the most important eukaryotic transcription factors [31]. A large fraction of m6A-containing genes being associated with transcription factors suggests a relationship between m6A mRNA methylation and nuclear genome transcription.

m6A modification is involved in tissue-differential regulation

Although some m6A peaks are shared between both tissues, we could detect a proportion of tissue-differential peaks (Methods). We firstly screened tissue-specific peaks between LM and LA, and identified 3,915 LM-specific and 869 LA-specific peaks (Fig. 1a). These peaks represented 3,034 and 562 tissue specifically methylated genes (TSMGs) in LM and LA respectively (Additional file 6: Data S4). GO analysis showed that these TSMGs are mainly involved in intracellular protein or nucleic acid binding, regulation of macromolecule metabolic processes and gene expression (Fig. 4a and Additional file 7: Data S5). LM TSMGs are mainly involved in the regulation of energy dependent signaling pathways such as the insulin signaling pathway and the AMP-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, while LA TSMGs are mainly involved in fatty acid metabolism such as the glyoxylate and lipoic acid metabolism, as well as cytoskeleton and system development. For example, our m6A-IP data revealed significant m6A peaks around the 5′UTR, stop codon and CDS of Irs1 and Foxo1 mRNAs from the insulin signaling pathway in LM but not in LA (Fig. 4b). The Irs1/2 → PI3K → Akt → Foxo1 branch of the insulin signaling pathway is largely responsible for hepatic insulin-regulated glucose homeostasis and somatic growth [32].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Functional analysis of differentially methylated genes between tissues. a Gene ontology analysis of tissue specifically methylated genes. b Examples of tissue specifically methylated genes with m6A peaks. c Gene ontology analysis of tissue dynamic methylated genes. d Examples of tissue dynamic methylated genes with m6A peaks. e Percentages of subgroups of genes divided by the differential peaks in gene regions between the two tissues. f Gene ontology analysis of differential peaks in gene regions related methylated genes between the two tissues. g Differentially expressed mRNAs in LM and LA. Genes with LM specific m6A peaks are highlighted in green, genes with LA specific m6A peaks are highlighted in orange, and genes with other m6A peaks are highlighted in black

Full size image

Further, we analyzed the dynamic m6A peaks, which were common to both tissue types but showed altered intensities judged by MAnorm model (Methods). We identified 382 common m6A peaks of significantly differential intensities, which represented 319 tissue dynamic methylated genes (TDMGs) in the two tissues (Additional file 6: Data S4). GO analysis showed that most TDMGs are involved in protein binding and establishment of cell polarity responsible for amoeboid cell migration, while some are involved in the regulation of immune and disease-related signaling pathways (Fig. 4c and Additional file 7: Data S5). Our m6A-IP data revealed significant m6A peaks in LA, but not LM, for five genes from the immunoglobulin superfamily (IGSF) including CD54 (ICAM-1), and CD106 (VCAM1) (Fig. 4d), which promote the adhesion of inflammatory sites, and play an important role in tumor progression and metastasis, and regulates immune responses [33].

Besides, we searched for differential peaks in gene regions between the two tissues. We found that LM had more peaks than LA, which were located in stop codon/ start codon/ both regions (Fig. 4e and Additional file 6: Data S4). GO analysis revealed that these tissue-differential methylated genes are mainly enriched for the nuclear part and are involved in the regulation of metabolic processes and protein binding (Fig. 4f and Additional file 7: Data S5).

As an initial exploration into the functional implications of m6A methylation differences across genomes, we asked whether m6A methylation regulates differences in gene expression. Using the input RNA-Seq data, we investigated the differential expression of genes (DE genes) from the two tissues. We identified 2,988 genes that were highly expressed in LM and 3,264 that were highly expressed in LA. Within the LM-high list, we detected more genes that contained m6A peaks in LM than in LA (1012/312, P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test). However, in the list of LA-high genes, we detected less genes containing m6A peaks in LA than in LM (495/581, P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) (Fig. 4g and Additional file 2: Table S3 and Additional file 6: Data S4). These results indicated that each tissue possesses its own characteristic m6A methylation sites that appear to be associated with gene activation.

m6A modification occurs in a breed-differential pattern

m6A modulation of active gene regulation at the cellular or species level also occurs in response to environmental changes and genetic background differences [10, 25], these findings indicated that it is possible to reveal the potential biological roles of RNA m6A modification by comparative analysis of pig breed-differential regulation of m6A modification. To explore the patterns and functions of m6A methylation modification among different pig breeds, we sampled muscle tissues from three pig breeds with different genetic backgrounds using the MeRIP-Seq technique. The three breeds included the undomesticated wild boar (WB, S.s. moupinensis), and the domestic Landrace (LD; a leaner, Western breed) and Rongchang (RC; a fatty, Chinese breed) pig breeds. We detected approximately 6, 500 ~ 7,500 m6A peaks representing approximately 5,500 ~ 6,000 expressed genes among the three breeds (Additional file 8: Data S6). The data revealed that WB showed a highest total m6A level while a lowest total m6A level was found in RC.

To discover the differential m6A methylation across the three pig breeds, we firstly identified multiple breed-specifically methylated peaks and breed-specifically methylated genes (BSMGs). Between WB and LD, 2,155 and 1,843 specific peaks were found, representing 2,846 (1,452/1,394) BSMGs, respectively (Additional file 1: Figures S3A and Additional file 9: Data S7). Likewise, between WB and RC, 2,510 and 1,912 specific peaks were found, representing 3186 (1,733/1,453) BSMGs, respectively (Additional file 1: Figures S3B and Additional file 9: Data S7); while 1,709 and 1,432 specific peaks were obtained between RC and LD, representing 2285 (1,257/1,028) BSMGs, respectively (Additional file 1: Figures S3C and Additional file 9: Data S7). GO analysis indicated that these BSMGs are mainly enriched for intracellular processes and are involved in fundamental biological functions such as protein/nucleic acid binding, transcription factor binding, cellular metabolic processes, developmental processes, and positive regulation of biological processes (Additional file 1: Figures S4A and S4B and S4C and Additional file 10: Data S8).

We further searched for the dynamic m6A peaks, which were common between both breeds but showed altered intensities judged by MAnorm model (Methods), and identified the dynamic m6A peaks related genes defined as breed dynamic methylated genes (BDMGs). First, between WB and LD, we found 219 common m6A peaks of significantly different intensities, representing 171 BDMGs (Additional file 9: Data S7). GO analysis indicated that these BDMGs are mainly enriched for the extracellular matrix and are involved in protein kinase, protein serine/threonine kinase and phosphotransferase activities (Figs. 5a and Additional file 10: Data S8). For instance, our m6A-IP data revealed significant m6A peaks around the 3′UTRs of MAP3K14 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 14) in LD but not in WB (Fig. 5d). MAP3K14 is a serine/threonine protein-kinase that stimulates nuclear factor κB activity [34]. Second, we found 296 common m6A peaks of significantly different intensities between WB and RC, representing 240 BDMGs (Additional file 9: Data S7). GO analysis indicated that these BDMGs are mainly enriched for the extracellular matrix and are involved in receptor/protein/glycosaminoglycan/binding, and development of the cardiovascular system (Fig. 5b and Additional file 10: Data S8). Our m6A-IP data revealed significant m6A peaks around the stop codon of JAG1 (cardiac transcription factor Jagged1) in RC but not in WB (Fig. 5d). JAG1 plays an important role in cardiac development [35]. Similarly, we obtained 112 common m6A peaks of significantly different intensities, representing 89 BDMGs between RC and LD (Additional file 9: Data S7). GO analysis indicated that these BDMGs are mainly enriched in biotin binding/biotin-protein ligase activity, semaphorin receptor complex/nuclear lamina, biotin-related metabolic pathway, and negative regulation of biological response to biotin (Fig. 5c and Additional file 10: Data S8). Our m6A-IP data revealed significant m6A peaks around the 5′UTRs of HLCS (holocarboxylase synthetase) in RC but not in LD (Fig. 5d). HLCS is the only enzyme in the human proteome capable of catalyzing the binding of biotin to proteins [36].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Functional analysis of differentially methylated genes among breeds. a Gene ontology analysis of breed dynamic methylated genes between WD and LD. WD represents Wild boar and LD represents Landrace. b Gene ontology analysis of breed dynamic methylated genes between WD and RC. RC represents Rongchang pigs. c Gene ontology analysis of breed dynamic methylated genes between RC and LD. d Examples of breed dynamic methylated genes with m6A peaks

Full size image

Discussion

m6A topological patterns between mammal and plant

In this study, we produced the first porcine transcriptome-wide m6A modification profile using MeRIP-Seq technology, and discovered that pig mRNA m6A sites are mainly enriched around stop codons, CDS, and 3′UTRs. They share a distribution similar to those of humans and mice by being enriched in long exons, near stop codons, and in 3′UTRs, although they also occur in 5′UTRs [10, 23]. This indicates that the overall distribution of m6A sites is similar in the mammalian transcriptomes. m6A sites in plants are not only enriched around stop codons and within 3′UTRs but are also found around start codons and 5′UTRs [25, 27]. This difference in distribution is suggestive of species-specificity of this form of mRNA methylation, nevertheless the difference in m6A enrichment pattern needs further confirmation. Overall, dominant m6A enrichment near stop codons and 3′UTRs is shown in most of mRNA between mammal and plant in this study as previously reported [10, 12, 23, 25,26,27], and this m6A distributing type may represent the typical m6A topological pattern in most of the mature mRNA. The extensively higher m6A signals at the stop codon or 3′UTRs may be responsible for RNA stability, signaling for transport and translocation, or as regulatory elements for protein translation through the recruitment of specific factors onto these m6A sites for RNA transport or protein synthesis [11, 37].

The consensus motif sequence RRACH has previously been shown to be over-represented in m6A motif regions [38,39,40] and also further been identified in some high throughput m6A RNA sequencing databases [10, 23, 25, 26]. Accordingly, in our current study we successfully identified the consensus motif sequence in the porcine transcriptome. Interestingly, Li et al. failed to find this consensus sequence RRACH in m6A motif regions of rice but another different motif sequences were enriched both by MEME and HOMER software [27]. It is uncertain of if the consensus sequence of the methylation in plants are different from mammals, so more methylome data of plant are required to confirm this hypothesis.

Extensively high m6A methylation in certain transcripts may be suitable or required for the transcriptional regulations of these transcripts

Several studies have reported that RNA m6A methylation plays a key role in the regulation of post-transcriptional gene expression [10, 23, 41, 42] and the importance of m6A in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression is further reinforced by the discovery and characterization of mammalian reader proteins that recognize m6A modifications of mRNA and subsequently affect the stability of the target transcripts [11] In this study, extensive high m6A methylation was also found in the transcripts for hundreds of nuclear signaling factors and transcription factors, such as CREB described as a cAMP-responsive transcription factor regulating the somatostatin gene [30] and ZNF family members regarded as one of the most important eukaryotic transcription factors [31], suggesting a relationship between m6A mRNA methylation and nuclear genome transcription. High methylation in these transcripts for nuclear transcription factors may confer signaling recognition to these transcripts [10].

Earlier findings revealed that one of the main functions of m6A is to mediate mRNA degradation in mammalian cells [4,5,6, 11], suggesting a possible negative relationship between the m6A methylation extent and the transcript level. Consequently, we also discovered that the highly expressed transcripts from adipose tissue were less methylated by m6A, as previously found in human brain and mouse liver tissues [10]. However, this observation somewhat differed from our present result in muscle tissue and these reports in leaves, flowers, and roots of A. thaliana, which showed that most of the highly expressed transcripts were relatively more modified by m6A [25, 26]. The reasons causing the differences may be due to different methodologies, different biological species, or different tissue samples although a number of studies have proved that m6A methylation is highly conserved among eukaryotes [10, 23, 25,26,27, 30]. Our results indicated that each tissue may possess its own characteristic m6A methylation sites, suggesting a regulatory role for m6A in gene expression.

Potential roles of differential m6A methylation among cells, tissues, and organs

m6A-modified nucleotides were previously shown to be widely distributed in animal tissues including the liver, kidney, brain, lung, and heart [10, 23]. Here, we detected 0.562 and 0.254 m6A peaks per actively expressed transcript in pig muscle and adipose tissues respectively. These results further affirm our notion that m6A is a universal form of RNA modification in animal tissues. However, the differential levels of m6A methylaytion in both tissues were much lesser than previous estimations of approximately 2 ~ 3 m6A residues per average mRNA transcript in mammalian cells, such as human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2) [10], mouse embryonic rat brain tissue [23], mouse naïve embryonic stem cells (ESCs), embryoid bodies (EBs) and embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [43], and mouse 3 T3-L1 pre-adipocyte cell line [15]. The differential proportion of the m6A modified transcripts may be due to different cell or tissue type, suggesting that these cells and tissues with strong proliferation and differentiation may require higher levels of m6A methylaytion to adapt to faster growth and development.

Differential m6A methylaytion among tissues has proved responsible for tissue or organ differentiation and development. For example, in adult mouse brain tissue, genes encoding m6A-containing RNAs are linked to neurodevelopmental and neurological disorders [10, 23] whereas m6A RNA methylation in Drosophila and Zebrafish early embryogenesis shows a conserved mechanism of neuronal mRNA regulation contributing to brain function [21, 44]. In plants, callus selectively methylated genes (SMGs) mainly participate in transcription regulator/factor activity whereas leaf SMGs mainly involve plastids and thylakoids [27]. Similarly, differential m6A patterns across organs including leaf, flower, and root organs were also found in Arabidopsis [26]. Here, we uncover tissue-differential regulation roles of m6A modification in muscle and adipose tissues. Differentially methylated genes of LM mostly participate in the regulation of energy-dependent signaling pathways, while those of LA regulate immune- and disease-related signaling pathways. This is similar to the previous observation that differentially DNA methylated regions are associated with obesity or cardiovascular diseases in porcine adipose tissue [45].

Potential roles of differential m6A methylation among populations

Modifications to transfer RNA and ribosomal RNA have previously been shown to change in response to stimuli, suggesting a general model of dynamic control for RNA modification [46, 47]. Similarly, m6A RNA modification also exhibits population-specific regulation in response to changes in cellular or species environment. Dominissini et al. [10] observed a subset of treatment-dependent, dynamically altered peaks in different human HepG2 cell lines. Similarly, Luo et al. [25] found that geographically diverse accessions of A. thaliana show strain-specific m6A mRNA imprints, with the strain-specific genes possessing different biological functions. Li et al. [45] detected differentially methylated DNA regions between LD, Tibetan, and RC pig breeds. In the present study, we also observed breed-specific regulation of m6A RNA modification. There are differences among the three porcine breeds with a highest total m6A level in WB and a lowest total m6A level in RC, and the m6A distribution could be influenced by differences in the breed’s surrounding environment and genetic backgrounds. The surrounding living environment for undomesticated WB is more complex than that for domestic LD and RC breeds, which may require a higher proportion of the m6A transcripts in wild boar to adapt to more diverse conditions; however, the genetic diversity of RC breed is lower because of long term artificial selection and small population number, which may require a lower extent of m6A RNA methylation in the Rongchang pig breeds to fit for these metabolisms that were processed in severe artificial selection conditions and small population in most of cases if our hypothesis aforementioned is rational.

Differential m6A methylaytion among breeds showed a connection of the functions of these transcripts required for or specific to this breed. For example, the transcripts presenting an extensively higher level of m6A methylation in LD were related to protein kinase, protein serine/threonine kinase and phosphotransferase activities, which may contribute to growth and development of muscle and to adapt to lean LD breeding. However, some of the differential and extensively methylated transcripts in the fatty RC pig were involved in the development of the cardiovascular system, further suggesting that there is a strong relationship between obesity and cardiovascular disease [45]. Briefly, the different m6A modification patterns may reflect marked phenotypic changes between WB, the leaner LD, and the fatty RC pig breeds. Outbreeding of these lineages is known to result in differences at the genetic level, the epigenetic state, as well as potential genotype–epigenotype interactions [48].

Conclusions

We provide the first known porcine transcriptome-wide m6A map of differentiated tissues and breeds. Our map reveals features of m6A distribution in the porcine transcriptome, and identifies tissue and breed generality as well as selectivity of methylated genes and their functional implications. We also discover a relationship between the m6A methylation extent and the transcript level, suggesting a regulatory role for m6A in gene expression. This comprehensive map provides a solid basis for the determination of potential functional roles for RNA m6A modification in adipose deposition and muscle growth.

Methods

Animals

Two 210-day-old sows from each of the pig breeds, undomesticated wild boar (WB), domestic Landrace (LD; a leaner, Western breed) and Rongchang (RC; a fatty, Chinese breed), were used in this study, and these pigs derived from the Farm of Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an city, Sichuan province, China. The WB originated in Southern China and belongs to S. s. moupinensis (a subspecies of wild boar). The WB lived in a wild state and were little artificial selection except for the transient impact of feeding system during the experimental period. There was no direct and collateral blood relationship among the last three generations of the six selected pigs. The piglets were weaned simultaneously at 28 ± 1 days of age. A starter diet administered from the 30th to the 60th day after weaning provided 3.40 Mcal kg−1 metabolizable energy with 20.0% crude protein (11.5 g/kg lysine). From the 61st to the 120th day, the pigs were fed a diet containing 14.0 MJ/kg of metabolizable energy consisting of 18.0% crude protein (9.0 g/kg lysine). From the 121st to the 210th day, they received a diet containing 13.5 MJ/kg of metabolizable energy and 16.0% crude protein (8.0 g/kg lysine). The animals were allowed access to food and water ad libitum and were maintained under the same conditions.

Tissue collection

At their predetermined slaughter age, all pigs were transported to the nearby slaughterhouse and humanely sacrificed. These pigs were not fed on the night before slaughter and were allowed to rest for 2 h after about 1 h of transportation (including loading and unloading), after which they were electrically stunned (90 V, 10 s, and 50 Hz) and exsanguinated as necessary to ameliorate suffering. All samples used in this study were collected according to the guidelines for care and use of experimental animals established by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China. Subcutaneous fatty tissue and the longissimus dorsi of the left side of each carcass at the last third/fourth rib were rapidly separated and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction.

RNA isolation and fragmentation

Total RNA was extracted from the longissimus dorsi and subcutaneous fatty tissue of the three breeds (LD, WB, and RC) using Trizol (Invitrogen, California, USA). Enrichment of polyadenylated RNAs (polyA+ RNAs) from total RNA was performed for a single round using the GenElute mRNA miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). RNA quality was tested by a nucleic acid concentration detector and gel electrophoresis. Enriched mRNAs were chemically fragmented into ~100-nucleotide fragments by incubating at 94 °C for 5 min in fragmentation buffer (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The fragmentation reaction was stopped with 0.05 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), followed by standard ethanol precipitation. The fragmented products were finally resuspended in H2O at ~1 μg/μ1, and subjected to immunoprecipitation and m6A sequencing.

RNA immunoprecipitation (IP)

Fragmented RNA (2.5 mg total RNA) was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 5 μg of affinity purified anti-m6A polyclonal antibody (Synaptic Systems, Göttingen, Germany) in IPP buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4). The mixture was then immunoprecipitated by incubation with protein-A beads (Repligen, Waltham, MA, USA) at 4 °C for an additional 2 h. After extensive washing, bound RNA was eluted from the beads with 0.5 mg/ml N 6-methyladenosine (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in IPP buffer and ethanol precipitated. The RNA was resuspended in H2O and used for library generation with mRNA sequencing kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Dot blot assays

Dot blot experiments were performed to compare m6A enrichment with input RNA before sequencing. 10 ng IP RNA and 10 ng input RNA (without immunoprecipitation) were spotted onto a nylon membrane (Hybond-N+). The membrane was dried and cross-linked twice with 200 000 μJ/cm2 UV. The cross-linked membrane was rinsed with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 for 5 min and blocked in 3% (w/v) BSA in PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h. The membrane was finally transferred into blocking solution supplemented with anti-m6A antibody (SYnaptic SYstems) diluted 1:1000 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The antibody exposed membrane was washed thrice with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 for a total of 30 min and transferred into blocking solution supplemented with HRP-linked secondary antibody diluted 1:2000. This was incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and washed thrice with PBS + 0.1% Tween-20. Peroxidase activity was detected with ECL (Western Lightning Plus-ECL, Perkin-Elmer) or SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific) and signal detection was done with the ChemiDoc XRS system (BioRad).

High throughput m6A and input RNA sequencing

High throughput m6A and input RNA sequencing of two samples from each of muscle and adipose tissues was performed on the Hi Seq3000 sequencing system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), using the Genomic sequencing kit V2 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Approximately 2.5 μg fragmented total RNA was reserved and used for the input RNA-seq before the IP experiments. Thus, m6A-seq and input RNA-seq were parallel and their data were mutually comparable in this study. RNA integrity number (RIN) was estimated using a Nanodrop 2000 UV vis (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). The quality control (QC) tests were done by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). All RNA sequencing of two samples from each of muscle and adipose tissues was performed on the same sequencer at the same batch.

Data analysis

Preprocessing sequencing reads and reads alignment

Sequence data analysis was performed according to the procedure described by Dominissini et al. [10] and Meyer et al. [23]. Briefly, raw data from IP RNA-seq and input RNA-seq were firstly both trimmed by Trim Galore (version 0.3.7) to remove the adapter and low quality data (Q < 25), and the reads shorter than 50 bp were discarded [49]. After this preprocessing, high reads were first aligned against the pig reference genome (Sscrofa10.2, Ensembl Sus scrofa) using Tophat software (version 2.0.14) with default parameter [50], and all reads that mapped to multiple genomic regions were discarded. Only reads that uniquely mapped to the reference sequences were analyzed further for m6A modification peaks. The read depth distribution was estimated using an ad hoc R program.

Identification of m6A modification peaks

m6A modification peaks were called using MACS software (version 1.4.2) with Mfold parameters set to 10, 30 and a P-value cutoff of 1e-5, and only one tag, which was optimal for detecting enriched regions was retained [51]; meanwhile, input RNA-seq data were used as background when calling peaks. Peaks that shared at least 50% overlapping lengths were defined as recurrent peaks.

Discernment of m6A topological patterns

Distribution of m6A sites in the different regions of the transcripts was estimated by Dominissini et al.’s method [10]. The consensus m6A of motif sequences were identified using Hypergeometric Optimization of Motif EnRichment software [52] with modification: approximately 1,000 the highest m6A peaks and approximately 50 nt length around each m6A peak were used for deduction of the consensus m6A motif sequences. The overall m6A distributing patterns were discerned by this method: a gene was splitted in to 60 bins. The read depth of each bin was normalized by per 1 kb per 1 Mb data, then the normalized depth was used to plot the patterns.

Analysis of common and differential peaks for tissues or breeds

For a peak to be classified as tissue- or breed- specific, it was assumed not to overlap (<50% overlapping length) any peak of the other tissue or breed; meanwhile we defined a peak which appears on both tissues or breeds as common peak (≥50% overlapping lengths). Dynamic methylated peaks (DMPs), which showing altered intensity in some of the common peaks were judged by MAnorm model [53], and peaks with P ≤ 0.01 and normalized change fold ≥ 2 were regarded as DMPs.

Multi-layer gene expression and function analysis

Gene expression levels were measured as numbers of input-sequencing reads per kilo bases of exon model in a gene per million uniquely mapped reads (RPKM) and calculated by Cufflinks software (version 2.2.1) [50]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between muscle and adipose tissues were identified with Cuffdiff program (version 2.2.1) [50], and genes with P ≤ 0.05 and normalized change fold ≥ 2 were regarded as DEGs. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed using DAVID bioinformatics, based on the GO consortium database and the hypergeometric distribution tes performed by R [54, 55].

Statistical analysis and graphics

All statistical analyses (unless stated otherwise) were performed using R and Perl packages for Statistical Computing. Most of the figures were produced using the ggplot2 package (R) [56]. Sequence logos were prepared using SeqLogo [57].

Abbreviations

3′-UTRs:

3′-untranslated regions

5′-UTRs:

5′-untranslated regions

BDMGs:

Breed dynamic methylated genes

BSMGs:

Breed-specific methylated genes

CDS:

Coding sequence

CREB:

cAMP responsive element-binding protein gene

FTO:

Fat mass and obesity-associated protein

GO:

Gene ontology

HLCS:

Holocarboxylase synthetase

IGSF:

Immunoglobulin superfamily

IP:

Immunoprecipitation

JAG1:

Cardiac transcription factor Jagged1

LA:

Landrace adipose tissue

LD:

Landrace

LM:

Landrace muscle tissue

m6A:

N 6-methyladenosine

MAP3K14:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14

MeRIP-Seq:

Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation with next-generation sequencing

RC:

Rongchang pig

SMGs:

Selectively methylated genes

TDMGs:

Tissue dynamic methylated genes

TSMGs:

Tissue specifically methylated genes

WB:

Wild boar

ZNF:

Zinc finger protein.

References

  1. Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. Methylated nucleotides block 5′terminus of HeLa cell messenger RNA. Cell. 1975;4:379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bokar JA, Shambaugh ME, Polayes D, Matera AG, Rottman FM. Purification and cDNA cloning of the AdoMet-binding subunit of the human mRNA (N 6-adenosine)-methyltransferase. RNA. 1997;3:1233–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Narayan P, Rottman FM. An in vitro system for accurate methylation of internal adenosine residues in messenger RNA. Science. 1988;242:1159–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, Jia G, Yu M, Lu Z, Deng X. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N 6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:93–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, Wang WJ, Adhikari S, Shi Y, Lv Y, Chen YS. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N 6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014;24:177–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Li Y, Toth JI, Petroski MD, Zhang Z, Zhao JC. N 6-methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:191–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, Yang Y, Yi C, Lindahl T, Pan T, Yang YG, et al. N 6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:885–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y, Fedorcsak P, Huang CM, Li C, Vågbø C, Shi Y, Wang WL, Song SH. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse Fertility. Mol Cell. 2012;49:18–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jia G, Fu Y, He C. Reversible RNA adenosine methylation in biological regulation. Trends Genet. 2012;29:108–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dominissini D, Moshitchmoshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmondivon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, Cesarkas K, Jacobhirsch J, Amariglio N, Kupiec M. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485:201–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, Fu Y, Parisien M, Dai Q, Jia G. N 6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505:117–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Batista P, Molinie B, Wang J, Qu K, Zhang J, Li L, Bouley D, Lujan E, Haddad B, Daneshvar K. m6A RNA modification controls cell fate transition in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15:707–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao BS, He C. Fate by RNA methylation: m6A steers stem cell pluripotency. Genome Biol. 2015;16:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen L, Liang Z, Gu X, Chen Y, Teo ZW, Hou X, Cai WM, Dedon PC, Liu L, Yu H. N 6-Methyladenosine RNA modification regulates shoot stem cell fate in arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2016;38:186–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao X, Yang Y, Sun BF, Shi Y, Yang X, Xiao W, Hao YJ, Ping XL, Chen YS, Wang WJ. FTO-dependent demethylation of N 6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 2014;24:1403–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fustin JM, Doi M, Yamaguchi Y, Hida H, Nishimura S, Yoshida M, Isagawa T, Morioka MS, Kakeya H, Manabe I. RNA-methylation-dependent RNA processing controls the speed of the circadian clock. Cell. 2013;155:793–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lichinchi G, Gao S, Saletore Y, Gonzalez GM, Bansal V, Wang Y, Mason CE, Rana TM. Dynamics of the human and viral m6A RNA methylomes during HIV-1 infection of T cells. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin S, Choe J, Peng D, Triboulet R, Gregory R. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62:335–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang C, Samanta D, Lu H, Bullen JW, Zhang H, Chen I, He X, Semenza GL. Hypoxia induces the breast cancer stem cell phenotype by HIF-dependent and ALKBH5-mediated m6A-demethylation of NANOG mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:E2047–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lence T, Akhtar J, Bayer M, Schmid K, Spindler L, Ho CH, Kreim N, Andrade-Navarro MA, Poeck B, Helm M, Roignant JY. m6A modulates neuronal functions and sex determination in Drosophila. Nature. 2016;540:242–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haussmann IU, Bodi Z, Sanchez-Moran E, Mongan NP, Archer N, Fray RG, Soller M. m6A potentiates Sxl alternative pre-mRNA splicing for robust Drosophila sex determination. Nature. 2016;540:301–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patil DP, Chen CK, Pickering BF, Chow A, Jackson C, Guttman M, Jaffrey SR. m6A RNA methylation promotes XIST-mediated transcriptional repression. Nature. 2016;537:369–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyer K, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason C, Jaffrey S. Comprehensive Analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′UTRs and near Stop codons. Cell. 2012;149:1635–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz S, Agarwala S, Mumbach M, Jovanovic M, Mertins P, Shishkin A, Tabach Y, Mikkelsen T, Satija R, Ruvkun G. High-resolution mapping reveals a conserved, widespread, dynamic mRNA methylation program in yeast meiosis. Cell. 2013;155:1409–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo GZ, Macqueen A, Zheng G, Duan H, Dore LC, Lu Z, Liu J, Chen K, Jia G, Bergelson J. Unique features of the m6A methylome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5630–5630.

  26. Wan Y, Tang K, Zhang D, Xie S, Zhu X, Wang Z, Lang Z. Transcriptome-wide high-throughput deep m6A-seq reveals unique differential m6A methylation patterns between three organs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. 2015;16(272):1–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Wang X, Li C, Hu S, Yu J, Song S. Transcriptome-wide N 6-methyladenosine profiling of rice callus and leaf reveals the presence of tissue-specific competitors involved in selective mRNA modification. RNA Biol. 2014;11:1180–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. 5'-Terminal and internal methylated nucleotide sequences in HeLa cell mRNA. Biochemistry. 1976;15:397–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schibler U, Kelley DE, Perry RP. Comparison of methylated sequences in messenger RNA and heterogeneous nuclear RNA from mouse L cells. J Mol Biol. 1977;115:695–714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Montminy MR, Bilezikjian LM. Binding of a nuclear protein to the cyclic-AMP response element of the somatostatin gene. Nature. 1987;328:175–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee MS, Gippert GP, Soman KV, Case DA, Wright PE. Three-dimensional solution structure of a single zinc finger DNA-binding domain. Science. 1989;245:635–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong XC, Copps KD, Guo S, Li Y, Kollipara R, Depinho RA, White MF. Inactivation of hepatic Foxo1 by insulin signaling is required for adaptive nutrient homeostasis and endocrine growth regulation. Cell Metab. 2008;8:65–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jander S, Heidenreich F, Stoll G. Serum and CSF levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in inflammatory neurologic diseases. Neurology. 1993;43:1809–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malinin NL, Boldin MP, Kovalenko AV, Wallach D. MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF-kappaB induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1. Nature. 1997;385:540–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hofmann JJ, Briot A, Enciso J, Zovein AC, Ren S, Zhang ZW, Radtke F, Simons M, Wang Y, Iruela-Arispe ML. Endothelial deletion of murine Jag1 leads to valve calcification and congenital heart defects associated with Alagille syndrome. Development. 2012;139:4449–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzuki Y, Aoki Y, Ishida Y, Chiba Y, Iwamatsu A, Kishino T, Niikawa N, Matsubara Y, Narisawa K. Isolation and characterization of mutations in the human holocarboxylase synthetase cDNA. Nat Genet. 1994;8:122–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Niu Y, Zhao X, Wu YS, Li MM, Wang XJ, Yang YG. N 6-methyl-adenosine (m6A) in RNA: an old modification with a novel epigenetic function. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013;11:8–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Csepany T, Lin A, Jr BC, Beemon K. Sequence specificity of mRNA N 6-adenosine methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:20117–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harper JE, Miceli SM, Roberts RJ, Manley JL. Sequence specificity of the human mRNA N 6-adenosine methylase in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:5735–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei CM, Moss B. Nucleotide sequences at the N 6-methyladenosine sites of HeLa cell messenger ribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1977;16:1672–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fu Y, Dominissini D, Rechavi G, He C. Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m6A RNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:293–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yue Y, Liu J, He C. RNA N 6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1343–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Geula S, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Dominissini D, Mansour AA, Kol N, Salmon-Divon M, Hershkovitz V, Peer E, Mor N, Manor YS, et al. Stem cells. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science. 2015;347:1002–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, Weng X, Chen K, Shi H, He C. N 6-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161:1388–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Li M, Wu H, Luo Z, Xia Y, Guan J, Wang T, Gu Y, Chen L, Zhang K, Ma J. An atlas of DNA methylomes in porcine adipose and muscle tissues. Nat Commun. 2011;3:850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan CT, Dyavaiah M, Demott MS, Taghizadeh K, Dedon PC, Begley TJ. A quantitative systems approach reveals dynamic control of tRNA modifications during cellular stress. Plos Genetics. 2010;6:267–76.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schaefer M, Pollex T, Hanna K, Tuorto F, Meusburger M, Helm M, Lyko F. RNA methylation by Dnmt2 protects transfer RNAs against stress-induced cleavage. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1590–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Janer G, Hakkert BC, Slob W, Vermeire T, Piersma AH, Janer G, Hakkert BC, Slob W. Analysis of DNA methylation in a three-generation family reveals widespread genetic influence on epigenetic regulation. Plos Genetics. 2011;7:e1002228-e1002228.

  49. Wu Z, Wang X, Zhang X. Using non-uniform read distribution models to improve isoform expression inference in RNA-seq. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, Cheng JX, Murre C, Singh H, Glass CK. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B Cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Shao Z, Zhang Y, Yuan GC, Orkin SH, Waxman DJ. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protocol. 2009;4:44–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Wickham H. Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 180–5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Bembom O. seqLogo: Sequence logos for DNA sequence alignments, R package v1.28.0. http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/seqLogo.html. 2016. Accessed 21 May 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the graduate students and teachers at the Laboratory of Zoology, and Swine Genetics and Breeding of Sichuan Agricultural University for experimental condition and advice.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31530073) and the Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (Grant No. IRT13083).

Availability of data and materials

All analysis results data generated during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Requests for the raw data should be made to the corresponding authors.

Authors’ contributions

YJ, XT, JC, YW and XL led the experiments and designed the analytical strategy, YC, HX, LZ, GT, ML, AJ, SS, LB, HL, JM, LJ, AW, QW, GZ, MX, JW and TH performed the experiments, YJ, XT, JC, YW, YC, HX, CH and XG analyzed the data, YJ, XT, JC, YW and XL wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the production of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All research involving animals were conducted according to the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, revised in June 2004) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China under permit No. SKY-S20140806.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, No. 46, Xinkang Road, Ya’an City, 625014, Sichuan Province, China

      Xuelian Tao, Jianning Chen, Yanzhi Jiang, Yingying Wei, Yan Chen, Huaming Xu, Anxiang Wen, Qin Wang, Guangxiang Zhu, Meng Xie, Jiayun Wu & Tao He

    2. Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China

      Li Zhu, Guoqing Tang, Mingzhou Li, Anan Jiang, Surong Shuai, Lin Bai, Haifeng Liu, Jideng Ma, Long Jin & Xuewei Li

    3. Genergy Biological Technology (Shanghai) Company of Limited Liability, Shanghai, 200233, China

      Chunyu Huang & Xiang Gao

    Authors
    1. Xuelian Tao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Jianning Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Yanzhi Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yingying Wei
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Yan Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Huaming Xu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Li Zhu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Guoqing Tang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Mingzhou Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Anan Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Surong Shuai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Lin Bai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Haifeng Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Jideng Ma
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Long Jin
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Anxiang Wen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    17. Qin Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    18. Guangxiang Zhu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    19. Meng Xie
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    20. Jiayun Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    21. Tao He
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    22. Chunyu Huang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    23. Xiang Gao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    24. Xuewei Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Yanzhi Jiang or Xuewei Li.

    Additional files

    Additional file 1: Figure S1.

    Dot blot analysis demonstrates antibody specificity for m6A. Figure S2. The motif sequence for m6A-containing peak regions. Figure S3. Outline of the common and specific m6A peaks among three breeds. Figure S4. Gene ontology analysis of the breed specifically methylated genes. (DOCX 922 kb)

    Additional file 2: Table S1.

    Summary of sequence data and read alignment statistics. Table S2. m6A density of transcripts with RPKM > 2. Table S3. Analysis of the correlation between gene expression difference and m6A methylation modification. (DOCX 24 kb)

    Additional file 3:

    data 1. m6A peaks and related genes in muscle and adipose tissues. (XLS 3209 kb)

    Additional file 4:

    data 2. Common m6A peaks in both muscle and adipose tissues, related genes and GO enrichment. (XLS 1971 kb)

    Additional file 5:

    data 3. Nucleus-related genes in PeakStop and GO enrichment. (XLS 1428 kb)

    Additional file 6:

    data 4. Different peaks related methylated genes in muscle and adipose tissues. (XLS 2947 kb)

    Additional file 7:

    data 5. Go analysis of tissue-differentially methylated genes. (XLS 1292 kb)

    Additional file 8:

    data 6. m6A peaks and related genes in among three breeds. (XLSX 2851 kb)

    Additional file 9:

    data 7. Different peaks related methylated genes among three breeds. (XLS 1836 kb)

    Additional file 10:

    data 8. Go analysis of breed-specific and -dynamic genes among three breeds. (XLS 2825 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Tao, X., Chen, J., Jiang, Y. et al. Transcriptome-wide N 6-methyladenosine methylome profiling of porcine muscle and adipose tissues reveals a potential mechanism for transcriptional regulation and differential methylation pattern. BMC Genomics 18, 336 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3719-1

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3719-1

    Keywords

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us