Skip to main content

Table 4 qRT-PCR validation of carp miRNAs expression during CyHV-3 infection

From: Host microRNA analysis in cyprinid Herpesvirus-3 (CyHV-3) infected common carp

miRNA

Fold change (P2 v. P1) of miRNA expression.

Ct mean value \( \overline{X} \) ± SD,N = 18 measured by qRT-PCR, (P2 v. P1)

Student’s t-test and p value

Fold change (P3 v. P1) of miRNA expression.

Ct mean value \( \overline{X} \) ± SD,N = 18 measured by qRT-PCR, (P3 v. P1)

Student’s t-test and p value

mir-1

-1,86/DOWN

P2: 29,92 ± 3,93 P1: 27,96 ± 4,64

t = 2,69

p = 0,02*

 

P3: 29,72 ± 3,41 P1: 27,96 ± 4,64

t = 1,96

p = 0,07

mir-205

 

P2: 30,76 ± 2,84 P1: 32,57 ± 2,67

t = −1,71

p = 0,11

2,45/UP

P3: 30,07 ± 2,82

P1: 32,57 ± 2,67

t = −2,49

p = 0,03*

miR 144

2,04/UP

P2: 23,81 ± 1,54 P1: 25,11 ± 1,41

t = −3,42

p = 0,004*

 

P3: 24,19 ± 1,86

P1: 25,11 ± 1,41

t = −2,14

p = 0,05

miR-27a-5p

 

P2: 34,93 ± 0,99 P1: 35,23 ± 1,16

t = −1,25

p = 0,23

-1,39/DOWN

P3: 35,97 ± 1,13 P1: 35,23 ± 1,16

t = 2,48

p = 0,03*

  1. Fold change – average change of miRNAs expression in 3 carps (s1, s2, s3) from each phase of infection), Ct value – comparison of average Ct value of qRT-PCR of 18 samples from experimental fish (including s1, s2, s3) between phases. Student’s t-test values for mean Ct values between phases(*) statistically significant differences between mean Ct values for p-value < 0.05