Skip to main content
Download PDF

Map-based cloning and characterization of BoCCD4, a gene responsible for white/yellow petal color in B. oleracea

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 242 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Brassica oleracea exhibits extensive phenotypic diversity. As an important trait, petal color varies among different B. oleracea cultivars, enabling the study of the genetic basis of this trait. In a previous study, the gene responsible for petal color in B. oleracea was mapped to a 503-kb region on chromosome 3, but the candidate gene has not yet been identified.

Results

In the present study, we report that the candidate gene was further delineated to a 207-kb fragment. BoCCD4, a homolog of the Arabidopsis carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) gene, was selected for evaluation as the candidate gene. Sequence analysis of the YL-1 inbred line revealed three insertions/deletions and 34 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding region of BoCCD4. Functional complementation showed that BoCCD4 from the white-petal inbred line 11–192 can rescue the yellow-petal trait of YL-1. Expression analysis revealed that BoCCD4 is exclusively expressed in petal tissue of white-petal plants, and phylogenetic analysis indicated that CCD4 homologs may share evolutionarily conserved roles in carotenoid metabolism. These findings demonstrate that BoCCD4 is responsible for white/yellow petal color variation in B. oleracea.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that function loss of BoCCD4, a homolog of Arabidopsis CCD4, is responsible for yellow petal color in B. oleracea.

Background

The flower is the reproductive structure of angiosperms, and petals exhibit extensive color variation, mainly due to the accumulation of flavonoids, carotenoids and/or betalain pigments. Flower color serves as a visual signal to attract pollinators and is thus very important for plant reproduction [1,2,3]. There are several reports that by affecting gene exchange, changes in flower color contribute to the species differentiation [4, 5]. Thus, flower can serve as a model for studying the relationship between phenotype and genotype during evolution [6]. Additionally, flower color protects plants against disease and UV radiation and helps to maintain the normal physiological function of floral organs [7, 8].

Carotenoids are mostly C40 isoprenoid compounds, comprising of over 750 members widely distributed in fungi, cyanobacteria, algae and plant [9]. Carotenoids biosynthesis takes place in plastids of plants. They present in photosynthetic tissues for light harvesting and photoprotection during photosynthesis [10]. In non-photosynthetic tissues, carotenoids impart color ranging from yellow to red to fruits and flowers as well as other organs [11]. Carotenoids also provide precursors for biosynthesis of plant hormones, including abscisic acid (ABA) and strigolactones [12, 13]. The pathway of carotenoid biosynthesis has been well characterized, and nearly all the enzymes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis in plants have been identified (see reviews by Howitt and Pogson; Ruiz-Sola and Rodríguez-Concepción) [14, 15].

Carotenoids are catabolized to produce various apocarotenoids by an evolutionarily conserved carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs). In the model plant Arabidopsis, the CCDs family has 9 members that are divided into two groups: five 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenases (NCED2, NCED3, NCED5, NCED6 and NCED9) and four CCDs (CCD1, CCD4, CCD7 and CCD8) [16, 17]. NCEDs specifically cleave 9-cis-violaxanthin and 9-cis-neoxanthin to produce C15 xanthoxin, the precursor for ABA [18]. CCDs act on different substrates, and their precise roles are not fully understood. CCD1 and CCD4 have multiple substrates, catalyzing carotenoid cleavage at different double-bond positions to produce such compounds as α-ionone, β-ionone, β-cyclocitral, crocin [17, 19], some of which attribute to scent and flavor of plant flowers and fruit [20, 21]. Moreover, CCD1 and CCD4 may be responsible for fruit and flower color variation in some species by affecting the accumulation of colorful carotenoids [17, 22,23,24]. Recent studies have found that CCD4 homologs play key roles in determining the white or yellow color of flowers in Chrysanthemum [25], Brassica napus [17] and azalea [23], and fruit color in peach [24]. CCD7 and CCD8 act sequentially in the strigolactone pathway by cleaving β-carotene to produce the precursor of strigolactone [26], a hormone regulating plant shoot branching and nodulation [27].

Brassica oleracea comprises multiple subspecies showing extreme phenotypic diversity. As an important trait, flower color varies among different B. oleracea cultivars: pervasive yellow petals with different degrees of yellowness and relatively fewer white petals, only existing in some cultivars of Chinese kale and cauliflower. Biochemical studies have revealed that variation in flower color in Brassica species is due to differences in the presence, amount, or type of carotenoid pigment [17, 22, 28]. Although previous studies have demonstrated that this yellow/white petal trait in B. oleracea is controlled by a single locus on C03 [29,30,31], the candidate gene has not yet been identified, and the molecular mechanism underlying petal color variation in B. oleracea species has not been elucidated.

Previously, we mapped the gene cpc-1 responsible for petal color in B. oleracea to a 503-kb region [31], though the candidate gene was not found. In the present study, we reported further mapping results for cpc-1. The coding region of the candidate gene was cloned and compared between white-petal line 11–192 (a Chinese kale inbred line) and yellow-petal line YL-1 (a cabbage inbred line). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of B. oleracea was conducted to validate the function of the candidate gene.

Results

Fine mapping of the petal color gene cpc-1

In a previous study, the candidate gene for petal color was mapped to a 503-kb region on C03 [31]. A larger F2 population was then developed, with 1251 recessive (yellow petal) individuals. By genotyping all 1251 recessive individuals using two flanking markers, we obtained 36 recombinants for M4064 and 22 recombinants for M4139. To genotype all recombinant individuals, additional InDel markers were developed in this interval. However, we detected a possible error in the 02–12 assembly (http://www.ocri-genomics.org/bolbase/index.html), as several markers showed different orders in the genetic map compared with their physical positions.

Thus, another physical map was constructed based on the TO1000 reference genome (http://plants.ensembl.org/Brassica_oleracea/Info/Index). By comparing the mapping region in the 02–12 and TO1000 reference genomes, we found that the region spans two scaffolds, Scaffold000063 and Scaffold000205, in the 02–12 reference genome. The physical and genetic maps indicated that Scaffold000063 was reversely assembled. In addition, cpc-1 was re-mapped to a 207-kb genomic region (C03:48,444,077..48,651,173) flanked by markers M4089 and M4085, with genetic distances of 0.16 cM and 0.88 cM, respectively. The genetic and physical maps are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map-based cloning of the B. oleracea gene cpc-1. The genetic map is in the middle; all markers are in the same order as in the TO1000-based physical map, but six markers are in reverse order compared with the 02–12-based physical map. Blue arrows indicate Scaffold000063

Full size image

Bol029878 is the candidate gene for cpc-1

B. oleracea database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/) analysis revealed 14 predicted genes (Table 1) in the 207-kb region. Bol029878 is a homolog of Arabidopsis CCD4. Due to its important role in oxidative cleavage pathways of carotenoids, Bol029878 was chosen as a candidate gene and named BoCCD4.

Table 1 The 14 putative gene models in the target mapping region
Full size table

The full-length sequence of the BoCCD4 gene was downloaded from two reference genomes, TO1000 and 02–12. Wild-type BoCCD4 has one exon predicted to encode a putative 596-amino acid protein, with 87.1% sequence identity with Arabidopsis CCD4. To detect any nucleotide variation in BoCCD4 between white- and yellow-petal plants, the region encompassing the gene body and − 2-kb promoter of BoCCD4 was amplified and sequenced using genomic DNA from YL-1 and 11–192. The gene sequence from 11-192(GenBank no. MK599257) was identical to that of TO1000, consistent with the fact that TO1000 is a Chinese kale-like-morphology plant with white flowers. Sequencing of this gene revealed multiple mutations in YL-1 (GenBank no. MK599258), a 1-bp insertion at the + 312 nucleotide position, a 7-bp deletion at the + 771 nucleotide position, a 1-bp deletion at the + 1094 nucleotide position, and 34 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Fig. 2). All InDels result in a frameshift and premature stop codon. As the first important mutation in the coding region, the 1-bp insertion alters the open reading frame from the 105th position and causes a premature stop codon, resulting in a predicted truncated 114-amino acid protein lacking the important carotenoid-oxygenase domain (amino acids 74–590) (Additional file 1). Using first-strand cDNA as a template, amplification with the primer Bocpc-CDS generated a full-length coding sequence of BoCCD4 from 11 to 192 but no product from YL-1. Together with RT-PCR results (see below), this finding indicates that BoCCD4 is not expressed in yellow-petal line YL-1, possibly due to altered transcript stability [32] or mutations in the promoter region. Indeed, we detected mutations in the − 2-kb promoter region, though it remains to be determined whether these mutations are crucial for suppressing expression of the transcript.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sequence alignment of BoCCD4 from 11-192 and YL-1. BoCCD4 from YL-1 shows 3 InDels and 34 SNPs compared with 11–192. Red asterisks indicate the non-synonymous SNP mutations

Full size image

A genic marker, Bol035718D771, was designed based on the 7-bp deletion and used for genotyping the parental line and recombinants of M4089 and M4085. All 13 recombinants showed the same band size as that of YL-1 (Additional file 2), indicating that this gene was co-segregates with the petal color phenotype.

Expression pattern of BoCCD4

To analyze the expression pattern of BoCCD4, semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed using different tissues: root, stem, leaf, silique, young buds and anther, pistil and open-flower petal. No expression was detected in any of the YL-1 tissues. However, BoCCD4 was preferentially expressed in petals of the white-petal line (Fig. 3). These results revealed that BoCCD4 is a tissue-specific gene that may cleave carotenoids in floral tissues, which is very different from its homolog in Arabidopsis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression pattern of BoCCD4. BoCCD4 was exclusively expressed in petal tissue of white-petal plants. BoCCD4-WT, the wild type BoCCD4 from 11-192 (white-petal inbred line); BoCCD4-MT, the mutant type BoCCD4 from YL-1 (yellow-petal inbred line); Actin-WT, actin from 11-192; Actin-MT, actin from YL-1

Full size image

Overexpression of BoCCD4 in YL-1 results in a transition of petal color from yellow to white or pale yellow

We introduced wild-type BoCCD4 driven by the CaMV35S promoter into the yellow-petal parent YL-1 using Agrobacterium-mediated B. oleracea transformation and obtained three independent overexpressing transgenic lines, OEX1, OEX2 and OEX3. OEX1 and OEX3 showed intermediate phenotypes, whereas OEX2 displayed a completely white petal similar to that of the white-petal line 11–192 (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phenotype of parental lines and three overexpressing transgenic lines. a The overexpressing transgenic lines OEX1 and OEX3 showed an intermediate phenotype; OEX2 displayed a completely white petal with no difference from that of 11–192. b expression level of BoCCD4 in parental lines and three overexpressing transgenic lines. Among the overexpressing transgenic lines, OEX2 showed the highest expression level, followed by OEX1 and OEX3, with a high correlation with phenotype

Full size image

We next examined the expression levels of the BoCCD4 gene introduced into these transgenic lines by semiquantitative RT-PCR. OEX2 showed the highest expression level, followed by OEX1 and OEX3 (Fig. 4b), indicating high correlation between the expression level of BoCCD4 and the white-petal phenotype. These results suggest that BoCCD4 disruption is responsible for yellow petal color in B. oleracea.

Phylogenetic analysis

To analyze the phylogenetic relationship between the BoCCD4 protein and its close homologs, we conducted BLASTP searches based on the protein database of NCBI and Ensembl Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org) using the full-length amino acid sequence of BoCCD4. We generated a neighbor-joining tree comprising BoCCD4 and 55 homologs from 38 species. These homologs were grouped into three main clades. BoCCD4 shows 87.1% sequence identity with Arabidopsis CCD4 and is located in the same clade as Arabidopsis CCD4, along with homologs from other cruciferous plants, B. rapa and B. napus (Fig. 5). All CCD4s from Cruciferae species evolved from a common ancestor. Arabidopsis has one CCD4, wheareas Brassica species retained two CCD4s homologs. Brassica CCD4s were assigned to subclades in accordance with their locations on A, B or C genome, indicating that Brassica CCD4s rapidly evolved after the whole-genome duplication event and the Brassiceae-lineage-specific whole-genome triplication event. We also conducted sequence alignment and analyses using BoCCD4 and functionally characterized CCD4s in other species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, Osmanthus fragrans, Chrysanthemum x morifolium, and Prunus persica (Fig. 6). All of these CCD4s contain a chloroplast transient peptide, four highly conserved histidine residues as an iron-ligating cofactor, and a glutamates or aspartate residue for fixing the iron-ligating histidines. These results indicate a conserved role for CCD4s in carotenoid metabolism.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phylogenetic analysis of BoCCD4 and its related proteins. The analyses involved 55 BoCCD4 homologs from 38 species

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Sequence alignment of the BoCCD4 amino acid sequence and four functionally characterized CCD4s from Arabidopsis thaliana, Osmanthus fragrans, Chrysanthemum x morifolium, Prunus persica. Green asterisks indicate the four highly conserved histidine residues as an iron-ligating cofactor; red asterisks indicate the conserved glutamates or aspartate for fixing the iron-ligating histidine residues

Full size image

Discussion

In B. oleracea, the white-petal trait segregates as a single locus, and white is dominant over yellow confirmed by different crosses [29,30,31, 33]. Recently, this locus was mapped to a region on C03 [29, 31]. In this study, we narrowed the gene to a 207-kb region, and we identified an incorrectly assembled scaffold, Scaffold000063, in the 02–12 genome, making positional mapping difficult. Two B. oleracea draft genome sequences are currently available: TO1000 (Chinese kale like) [34], and 02–12 (cabbage) [35]. These draft genomes facilitate basic genetics and genomics research but still need to be improved. The B. oleracea genome is estimated to be over 600 Mb, though the published pseudo-chromosome size is 388.8 Mb for 02–12 and 488.6 Mb for TO1000 [34, 35]. B. oleracea genome assembly errors are apparently not rare in previous studies [36,37,38]. In particular, regarding Lee et al., a genotyping-by-sequencing-based high-resolution genetic map allowed identification of 37 misanchored scaffolds for 02–12 and 2 misanchored scaffolds for TO1000 [38].

We predicted a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase gene, BoCCD4, homologous to the Arabidopsis CCD4 gene as the candidate gene. Sequence analysis, functional complementation, and expression pattern analysis demonstrated that functional loss of BoCCD4 has resulted in widespread yellow-petal B. oleracea accessions. A similar CCD4-based mechanism has been found in other plants. In chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.), CmCCD4a degrades carotenoids into colorless compounds, resulting in a white petal color, as confirmed by expression and RNA interference (RNAi) analyses [25]. In azalea (Rhododendron japonicum f. flavum), high expression of a CCD4 gene was identified in a white-flowered accession and its progeny and is considered the key factor controlling flower color [23]. In peach (P. persica), evidence from cultivars, somatic revertants and ancestral relatives support that PpCCD4 is responsible for white/yellow flesh color and that yellow peach alleles have arisen from three independent mutations [32]. In B. napus, Zhang et al. reported that a transposable element insertion (TE1) disrupts BnaC3.CCD4, resulting in a yellow flower [17]. TE1 was also identified in some accessions of B. oleracea, for example, in cabbage lines 02–12 (draft genome) and some yellow-petal Chinese kale lines, indicating that flower petal color variation in B. oleracea follows a similar CCD4-disruption mechanism, as confirmed in the present study. Additionally, it is possible that yellow petals originally appeared in ancestors of B. oleracea and that one mutant type, i.e. TE1, was passed to B. napus.

BoCCD4 is a floral tissue-specific gene that differs from Arabidopsis CCD4 which is expressed in various vegetative tissues and floral tissues. B. oleracea has experienced a whole-genome duplication (WGD) event [39,40,41] and subsequent whole-genome triplication (WGT) [41]. According to previous studies, duplicated gene copies may undergo divergence in expression patterns or functions [41, 42]. It is interesting that one of the duplicated copies, BoCCD4 on C03, evolved tissue-specific expression patterns and underwent loss-of-function events, converting flower color from white to yellow without influencing carotenoid metabolism in vegetative tissues. This phenomenon has also been found in other plants, whereby duplicated CCD4 genes evolved different expression patterns in tomato [43], C. morifolium [25], and mandarin orange [44]. In addition, Rodrigo et al. reported that one CCD4 copy evolved novel carotenoid cleavage activity [44].

Parallel evolution is a common evolutionary phenomenon in which different populations independently evolve the same trait [45, 46]. For example, three dwarf populations of the forest tree Eucalyptus globulus have evolved in parallel from local tall ecotypes [47]. In the Mina lineage of Ipomoea, parallelism was observed at different levels during the transition of flower color, primarily caused by cis-regulation of the F3’H gene [48]. In addition, parallel evolution at the FLC locus has conferred flowering time variation in the cruciferous plant Capsella rubella. In B. oleracea, using different accessions, we confirmed the presence of at least five pervasive key mutations in the coding region of BoCCD4: two transposons (TE1 and TE2) and three InDels (+ 312 insertion, + 771 deletion, and + 1094 deletion). Different yellow-petal haplotypes (nonfunctional alleles) harbor one independent key mutation or combination of two or more mutations. The presence of these independent mutations indicates that parallel evolution of BoCCD4 possibly occurred in populations of the B. oleracea ancestors. Parallel phenotypic changes may be caused by different genetic changes, different changes at the same locus, and in some cases changes in the same nucleotide at the same locus [48,49,50], which may explain the phenomenon that some nonfunctional alleles of BoCCD4 harbor combinations of different mutations, for example, the allele of the YL-1 inbred line harbors all three InDels, whereas the allele of the 02–12 inbred line harbors TE1 and the + 1094 deletion.

Conclusions

In this study, the gene responsible for petal color in B. oleracea was mapped to a 207-kb fragment. A carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) gene, BoCCD4 was identified as a candidate. Sequence analysis revealed multiple mutations in the coding region of BoCCD4 alleles of yellow-petal accessions. Overexpression of wild-type BoCCD4 allele from 11-192 rescued the yellow-petal trait in YL-1, demonstrating that functional loss of BoCCD4 resulted in the widespread yellow-petal B. oleracea accessions. This study provides insight into the formation of white/yellow petal color in B. oleracea.

Methods

Plant materials

Brassica oleracea lines YL-1 (yellow petal) and 11–192 (white petal) were described in a previous study [31]. These lines were used as parents to construct F2 and backcross (BC) populations for mapping cpc-1 [31]. In this study, a larger F2 population comprising 1251 recessive (yellow petal) individuals was produced for map-based cloning of cpc-1.YL-1 was also used as acceptor plants for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Map-based cloning

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of parents and F2 individuals using a modified CTAB (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide) protocol [31]. A set of insertion/deletion (InDel) markers (Additional file 3) around the previously reported mapping region was developed. Polymorphic markers between YL-1 and 11–192 were used to genotype all yellow-petal individuals of the F2 population. Polymerase chain reaction and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were performed following a previously described procedure [31]. Genetic and physical maps were constructed using MapDraw [51].

Plasmid construction and functional complementation

For functional complementation, the coding sequence of cpc-1 was amplified from white-petal parent 11–192 using the primer Bocpc-CDS. The fragment was subcloned into a modified binary vector pBWA(V) BS (reconstructed from pCAMBIA1301) driven by the CaMV35S promoter, and the hygromycin resistance gene was replaced with an herbicide resistance marker (Bar) to generate the construct Pro35S::BoCCD4. This construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into yellow-petal parent YL-1 using the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation procedure for B. oleracea described by Yi et al. [52].

Expression analysis of BoCCD4

Total RNA was extracted from plant tissues, including roots, stems, leaves, siliques, young buds, sepals, petals, pistils and anthers of YL-1 and 11–192 and petals of overexpressing lines using an RNAprep pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA removing from the extracted RNA, first-strand cDNA synthesis and semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were performed as previously described [53]. The primers for RT-PCR are listed in Additional file 3.

Phylogenetic analysis

BLASTP searches were conducted using the amino acid sequence of BoCCD4 to search for homologs in the protein databases of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org). Protein sequence alignment was performed with MAFFT (v7.037) [54]. FastTree (LG + JTT model) was used to construct phylogenetic trees [55].

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

BC:

Backcross

CCD4 :

Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4

FLC:

Flowering locus C

InDel:

Insertion/deletion

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NCED:

9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase

SNPq:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

UV:

Ultraviolet

WGD:

Whole-genome duplication

WGT:

Whole-genome triplication

References

  1. Brown BA, Clegg MT. Influence of flower color polymorphism on genetic transmission in a natural population of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution. 1984;38:796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones KN, Reithel JS. Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot. 2001;88:447–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Noda N, Aida R, Kishimoto S, Ishiguro K, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Tanaka Y, Ohmiya A. Genetic engineering of novel bluer-colored chrysanthemums produced by accumulation of delphinidin-based anthocyanins. Plant and Cell Physiol. 2013;54:1684–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coyne JA. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992;355:511–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schemske DW, Bradshaw HD. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:11910–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clegg MT, Durbin ML. Flower color variation: a model for the experimental study of evolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:211–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koes RE, Quattrocchio F, Mol JNM. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in plants: function and evolution. BioEssays. 1994;16:123–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Treutter D. Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance and enhancement of their biosynthesis. Plant Biol. 2005;7:581–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ariizumi T, Kishimoto S, Kakami R, Maoka T, Hirakawa H, Suzuki Y, et al. Identification of the carotenoid modifying gene PALE YELLOW PETAL 1 as an essential factor in xanthophyll esterification and yellow flower pigmentation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant J. 2014;79:453–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Domonkos I, Kis M, Gombos Z, Ughy B. Carotenoids, versatile components of oxygenic photosynthesis. Prog Lipid Res. 2013;52:539–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DellaPenna D, Pogson BJ. Vitamin synthesis in plants: tocopherols and carotenoids. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:711–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan H, Zhang J, Nageswaran D, Li L. Carotenoid metabolism and regulation in horticultural crops. Hortic Res. 2015;2:15036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walter MH, Strack D. Carotenoids and their cleavage products: biosynthesis and functions. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:663–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howitt CA, Pogson BJ. Carotenoid accumulation and function in seeds and non-green tissues. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:435–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-Sola MÁ, Rodríguez-Concepción M. Carotenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: a colorful pathway. Arabidopsis Book. 2012;10:e0158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan BC, Joseph LM, Deng WT, Liu L, Li QB, et al. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis 9-cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene family. Plant J. 2003;35:44–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang B, Liu C, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang Y, Yao X, Wang F, Wu J, et al. Disruption of a CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE 4 gene converts flower colour from white to yellow in Brassica species. New Phytol. 2015;206:1513–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cutler AJ, Krochko JE. Formation and breakdown of ABA. Trends Plant Sci. 1999;4:472–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubio A, Rambla JL, Santaella M, Gómez MD, Orzaez D, et al. Cytosolic and plastoglobule-targeted carotenoid dioxygenases from Crocus sativus are both involved in β-ionone release. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24816–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baldermann S, Kato M, Fleischmann P, Watanabe N. Biosynthesis of α-and β-ionone, prominent scent compounds, in flowers of osmanthus fragrans. Acta Biochim Pol. 2012;59:79–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma G, Zhang L, Matsuta A, Matsutani K, Yamawaki K, et al. Enzymatic formation of β-citraurin from β-cryptoxanthin and zeaxanthin by carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase4 in the flavedo of citrus fruit. Plant Physiol. 2013;163:682–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohmiya A. Diversity of carotenoid composition in flower petals. Japan Agric Res. 2011;45:163–2171.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ureshino K, Nakayama M, Miyajima I. Contribution made by the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 gene to yellow colour fade in azalea petals. Euphytica. 2016;207:401–2417.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai S, Tuan PA, Tatsuki M, Yaegaki H, Ohmiya A, Yamamizo C, Moriguchi T. Knockdown of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) via virus-induced gene silencing confers yellow coloration in peach fruit: evaluation of gene function related to fruit traits. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2016;34:257–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohmiya A, Kishimoto S, Aida R, Yoshioka S, Sumitomo K. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CmCCD4a) contributes to white color formation in chrysanthemum petals. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1193–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alder A, Jamil M, Marzorati M, Bruno M, Vermathen M, Bigler P, et al. The path from β-carotene to carlactone, a strigolactone-like plant hormone. Science. 2012;335:1348–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dun EA, Brewer PB, Beveridge CA. Strigolactones: discovery of the elusive shoot branching hormone. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:364–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kull D, Pfander H. Isolation and identification of carotenoids from the petals of rape (Brassica napus). J Agr Food Chem. 2002;43:2854–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma B, Shinada T, Kifuji Y, Kitashiba H, Nishio T. Molecular mapping of a male fertility restorer locus of Brassica oleracea using expressed sequence tag-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers and analysis of a syntenic region in Arabidopsis thaliana for identification of genes encoding pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. Mol Breed. 2012;30:1781–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spini VBMG, Kerr WE. Genetic analisys of a cross of gaillon (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) with cauliflower (B. oleracea var. botrytis). Genet Mol Biol. 2000;23:221–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han F, Yang C, Fang Z, Yang L, Zhuang M, Lv H, et al. Inheritance and InDel markers closely linked to petal color gene (cpc-1) in Brassica oleracea. Mol Breed. 2015;35:160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Falchi R, Vendramin E, Zanon L, Scalabrin S, Cipriani G, Verde I, et al. Three distinct mutational mechanisms acting on a single gene underpin the origin of yellow flesh in peach. Plant J. 2013;76:175–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kianian SF, Quiros CF. Trait inheritance, fertility, and genomic relationships of some n = 9 Brassica species. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1992;39:165–75.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parkin IAP, Koh C, Tang H, Robinson SJ, Kagale S, Clarke WE, et al. Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu S, Liu Y, Yang X, Tong C, Edwards D, Parkin IA, et al. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3930.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Yang C, Han F, Fang Z, Yang L, Zhuang M, et al. Genetics and fine mapping of a yellow-green leaf gene (ygl-1) in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Mol Breed. 2016;36:82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu X, Gao B, Han F, Fang Z, Yang L, Zhuang M, et al. Genetics and fine mapping of a purple leaf gene, BoPr, in ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala). BMC Genomics. 2017;18:230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee J, Izzah NK, Choi BS, Joh HJ, Lee SC, Perumal S, et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing map permits identification of clubroot resistance QTLs and revision of the reference genome assembly in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). DNA Res. 2015;23:29–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 2003;422:433–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jiao WNJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473:97–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, Liu S, et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1035–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wessinger CA. A genetic route to yellow flowers. New Phytol. 2015;206:1193–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Galpaz N, Ronen G, Khalfa Z, Zamir D, Hirschberg J. A chromoplastspecific carotenoid biosynthesis pathway is revealed by cloning of the tomato white-flower locus. Plant Cell. 2006;18:1947–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rodrigo MJ, Alquezar B, Alos E, Medina V, Carmona L, Bruno M, Al-Babili S, Zacarias L. A novel carotenoid cleavage activity involved in the biosynthesis of Citrus fruit-specific apocarotenoid pigments. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:4461–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Orr HA. The probability of parallel evolution. Evolution. 2005;59:216–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S, Villarreal G, Dickson M, Grimwood J, et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science. 2005;307:1928–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Foster SA, McKinnon GE, Steane DA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, et al. Parallel evolution of dwarf ecotypes in the forest tree Eucalyptus globulus. New Phytol. 2007;175:370–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Des Marais DL, Rausher MD. Parallel evolution at multiple levels in the origin of hummingbird pollinated flowers in Ipomoea. Evolution. 2010;64:2044–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bernasconi P, Woodworth AR, Rosen BA, Subramanian MV, Siehl DL. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target Acetolactate synthase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:17381–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Crandall KA, Kelsey CR, Imamichi H, Lane HC, Salzman NP. Parallel evolution of drug resistance in HIV: failure of nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rate ratio to detect selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:372–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu R, Meng J. Map draw: a microsoft excel macro for drawing genetic linkage maps based on given genetic linkage data. Hereditas. 2003;25:317–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yi D, Cui L, Wang L, Liu Y, Zhuang M, Zhang Y, et al. Pyramiding of Bt cry1Ia8 and cry1Ba3 genes into cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) confers effective control against diamondback moth. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2013;115:419–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Han F, Yuan K, Kong C, Zhang X, Yang L, Zhuang M, et al. Fine mapping and candidate gene identification of the genic male-sterile gene ms3 in cabbage 51S. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:2651–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:1641–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Major State Research Development Program (2016YFD0101702), the Nationa Science Foundation of China (31572141), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-IVFCAAS), and the earmarked fund for the Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System, China (nycytx-35-gw01). The work reported herein was performed in the Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China. These funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Data of this study have been included in the article or as Additional files.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fengqing Han, Huilin Cui and Bin Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, #12 Zhong Guan Cun Nandajie Street, Beijing, 100081, China

    Fengqing Han, Bin Zhang, Xiaoping Liu, Limei Yang, Mu Zhuang, Honghao Lv, Zhansheng Li, Yong Wang, Zhiyuan Fang & Yangyong Zhang

  2. College of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China

    Huilin Cui & Jianghua Song

Authors
  1. Fengqing Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huilin Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Limei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mu Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Honghao Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhansheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhiyuan Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jianghua Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yangyong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ, JS and ZF conceived and designed the work. FH, HC and BZ performed the experiments and analyzed the data. FH and YZ wrote and revised the manuscript. XL, LY, MZ, HL, YW, and ZL analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangyong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Sequence alignment of the deduced BoCCD4 amino acid sequences from 11 to 192 and YL-1. The + 312-insertion in BoCCD4 of YL-1 alters the open reading frame and causes a premature stop codon, resulting in a predicted truncated 114-amino acid protein. (TIF 13823 kb)

Additional file 2:

Polymorphisms of marker Bol035718D771 in parents and 13 recombinants. M, DNA ladder; P1, inbred line YL-1; P2, inbred line 11–192. (TIF 10174 kb)

Additional file 3:

Primers used in this study for genetic mapping, gene amplification and RT-PCR. (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, F., Cui, H., Zhang, B. et al. Map-based cloning and characterization of BoCCD4, a gene responsible for white/yellow petal color in B. oleracea. BMC Genomics 20, 242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5596-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5596-2

Keywords

  • Brassica oleracea
  • Petal color
  • Fine mapping
  • Candidate gene
  • Functional validation
  • Expression pattern

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us