Skip to main content
Download PDF

geneHummus: an R package to define gene families and their expression in legumes and beyond

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 591 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

During the last decade, plant biotechnological laboratories have sparked a monumental revolution with the rapid development of next sequencing technologies at affordable prices. Soon, these sequencing technologies and assembling of whole genomes will extend beyond the plant computational biologists and become commonplace within the plant biology disciplines. The current availability of large-scale genomic resources for non-traditional plant model systems (the so-called ‘orphan crops’) is enabling the construction of high-density integrated physical and genetic linkage maps with potential applications in plant breeding. The newly available fully sequenced plant genomes represent an incredible opportunity for comparative analyses that may reveal new aspects of genome biology and evolution. The analysis of the expansion and evolution of gene families across species is a common approach to infer biological functions. To date, the extent and role of gene families in plants has only been partially addressed and many gene families remain to be investigated. Manual identification of gene families is highly time-consuming and laborious, requiring an iterative process of manual and computational analysis to identify members of a given family, typically combining numerous BLAST searches and manually cleaning data. Due to the increasing abundance of genome sequences and the agronomical interest in plant gene families, the field needs a clear, automated annotation tool.

Results

Here, we present the geneHummus package, an R-based pipeline for the identification and characterization of plant gene families. The impact of this pipeline comes from a reduction in hands-on annotation time combined with high specificity and sensitivity in extracting only proteins from the RefSeq database and providing the conserved domain architectures based on SPARCLE. As a case study we focused on the auxin receptor factors gene (ARF) family in Cicer arietinum (chickpea) and other legumes.

Conclusion

We anticipate that our pipeline should be suitable for any taxonomic plant family, and likely other gene families, vastly improving the speed and ease of genomic data processing.

Background

By using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, researchers have massively increased the number of nucleotide sequences deposited in public databases [1]. This had revolutionized numerous fields including the plant sciences (Fig. 1). However, a bottleneck in the field of plant sciences is the annotation of the protein sequences and the characterization of their functions. Identifying the function of important proteins can be used to improve agronomic performance, like altering resistance or tolerance of plants to specific environmental stressors such as drought or heat. One approach to infer the function of an unknown protein is to identify conserved sequences among proteins with known function, which can be useful to the extent that homology can imply conserved biochemical function [2].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Statistics on the number of protein-coding sequences deposited in NCBI every year. Number of plants and chickpea protein-coding sequences deposited in NCBI over the past 3 decades

Full size image

The plant hormone auxin (indole-3-acetic acid) is a key regulator of virtually every aspect of plant growth and development [3]. As a central role of the auxin-signaling pathway, the auxin response factor (ARF) multigene family is present in all major divisions of land plants [4]. Considering the important role of ARF family members as regulators of plant growth and developmental processes, in the last few years there has been a considerable interest in studying the ARF family in both annual herbaceous plants [5, 6] and woody perennials [7, 8]. Characterization of ARF typically gives insights into the genomic structures [9], loci distribution across the genomes [10], sequence homology [11], phylogenetic history [12], and gene expression patterns [13] during development and/or biotic/abiotic stress. Efficient characterization of ARF family members could vastly improve both the number of useful genomic targets that could be identified to improve agronomic performance, and the speed with which they are characterized. Doing so within the legume family could have a dramatic impact on the availability of nutritious food and on ecosystem resilience [14].

Currently, the identification and characterization of plant gene families is laborious and time-consuming. It requires an iterative process of computational analysis to identify the gene family members of a given family. This process is based mainly on Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [15] searches interspersed with manual curation and pruning (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Due to the increasing number of sequences and the agronomical interest in plant gene families, this process could benefit from an automated tool. Although, numerous bioinformatics tools have been already developed to identify homologous proteins, these tools are largely restricted to static databases of fully sequenced animal genomes, and thus a tool that could work for plant genomes is needed.

To meet this need, we developed geneHummus, a novel R package that efficiently identifies members (accessions) of a plant gene family. By querying the SPARCLE and RefSeq databases, geneHummus can quickly isolate architecture identifiers from whole or draft genomes across taxonomic kingdoms, and update as new sequences are accessioned. In addition, geneHummus simplifies downstream analysis such as phylogenetic constructions and gene expression profiles. As a case study we focused on the auxin receptor factors gene (ARF) family in Cicer arietinum (chickpea) and other legumes, having previously manually annotated the ARF family in the chickpea genome [5], therefore having a gold standard dataset to which to compare our pipeline results. In our case study on the ARF gene family, the functionality of geneHummus allows an integrated workflow with phylogeny and expression profiles. We anticipate that our pipeline should be suitable for the study of any plant gene family, and likely other gene taxonomic families, vastly improving the speed and ease of genomic data processing.

Implementation

geneHummus is implemented as an R package and requires a minimal set of dependencies (dplyr [16], stringr [17], rentrez [18], httr, utils and curl packages) which are automatically downloaded from the CRAN repository [19] as needed. In this section, we describe the implementation of geneHummus in detail. There is also additional documentation describing the ARF case study available from our Github repository [20]. This pipeline was designed for a biologist end-user with a minimal amount of programming experience, using open source and free software (R, NCBI tools) to guide the user through the identification, characterization and expression analysis of gene families. Plant gene families are characterized by common protein structure. The structure that defines a given family is known from literature. For example, the hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles of the ARF gene family are the B3 DNA binding domain (B3), AUX_RESP, and AUX/IAA, which correspond with the conserved domains Pfam 02362, Pfam 06507, and Pfam 02309. The pipeline begins by defining the conserved domains accession numbers as a query against the SPARCLE database at the NCBI (Fig. 2). Then, you can get the SPARCLE architecture identifiers (ids) for each conserved domain and extract, or filter, only those architectures that characterize the ARF gene family. Next, the protein electronic ids for each candidate ARF architecture are retrieved. Depending on your dataset this step may take from seconds to 3–5 min. Note that if you have a very long list of protein ids, you may receive a 414 error when you try to interact with the NCBI E-utilities. geneHummus subsets the elements (up to 300 ids per list), so the functions can work properly. The retrieved protein ids are filtered by the taxonomy ids of interest [21], which in this case study were the legumes ids. genehummus returns only the protein ids hosted by the RefSeq database. Finally, the electronic ids are converted to protein accessions. At this point we have likely identified the whole set of ARF protein accessions from the legume family. Downloading the amino acid sequences from the accessions is straightforward. Once these sequences are downloaded, the relevant information may be used for phylogenetic and expression studies.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Workflow diagram for geneHummus. The workflow shows the identification of protein families for legumes based on preparation of data (blue color), identification of family members by their electronic identifiers (green color), and retrieval of accessions and quantitative protein distribution per species (red color). R functions used in each step are highlighted in bold font

Full size image

Downstream analyses outside of the geneHummus R package

Phylogenetic analysis

Multiple protein sequence alignments (MSAs) were performed on the conserved Pfam domains [Pfam 02309: AUX/IAA family; Pfam 06507: ARF (AUX_RESP); Pfam 02362: B3 DNA binding domain (B3)] for the whole dataset. Multiple alignments were performed with MAFFT version 7.402 [22] using standard methods (FFT-NS-i) and the following parameters: mafft --thread 10 --threadtb 5 -- threadit 0 --reorder --leavegappyregion. A recent online version of the software is available as well [23]. A NJ tree was conducted using the JTT substitution model, 500 replicates of bootstrap, and pair-wise detection of gaps. Two representative of gymnosperms (Picea sitchensis and Pinus pinaster) were included as outgroup species.

Expression analysis

Using 1 single gene-model per locus, we created a BLAST database with the 24 ARF genes from the chickpea genome. Using Magic-BLAST [24], we studied the frequency of the ARF family in root tissues of two genotypes under drought stress and control conditions across 4 publicly available SRA libraries with the following parameters: alignment score = 125 bp, alignment identity ≥99% and read abundance in the four SRA libraries -- a list can be found at [25]. A normalization factor was estimated for each SRA library by dividing the average SRA size by the corresponding SRA size. The normalization factor was applied to each read to give normalized counts.

Results and discussion

External validation of data

Numerous approaches have been developed to predict the function of different proteins. The Subfamily Protein Architecture Labeling Engine (SPARCLE; [26]), a recently developed resource by National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), is one such approach. SPARCLE can help functional characterization of protein sequences by grouping them according to their characteristic domain architecture. We searched the SPARCLE database to obtain the whole set of molecular architectures based on the conserved domains that define the ARF gene family. Then, we filtered the data from SPARCLE to select the taxonomic group for the legume family (Fabaceae), and the source database (RefSeq; [27]). After these filters, we obtained over 560 different ARF legume proteins encoded by ~ 330 gene loci (Fig. 3). After separating these results by species, our pipeline identified 24 ARF proteins in the chickpea genome (Cicer arietinum), reproducing the results obtained previously with an iterative exhaustive BLAST search [5]. These results validate the geneHummus approach, which provides an automated way to produce these results in less than 6 min, as opposed to the exhaustive BLAST method which required significant manual curation and over 6 months of work. In addition, the geneHummus pipeline also returned the number of ARF proteins in 9 other legume species in this 6 min processing window (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the number of ARF proteins is similar in different species within the same genus (Arachis duranesis and Arachis ipaensis; Vigna angularis and Vigna radiata), as may be expected. In addition, species known to possess a high number of expanded paralogous genes due to whole-genome duplications events, such as Glycine and Lupinus lineages [28], showed the highest values both in the number of transcripts and number of ARF loci. We found that geneHummus is specific and sensitive by identifying the same sequences previously reported in other legume studies characterizing the ARF family through exhaustive searches, such as M. truncatula or soybean [6, 29]. But we also found more ARF accessions than had ever previously been reported, as geneHummus uses the latest updated RefSeq database version available at GenBank (Table 1). All of these results increase confidence in the validity of our approach. To find the ARFs in the different legume species using our pipeline, we developed an interactive shiny application to access this data [30]. After running the geneHummus pipeline, researchers interested in loading the relevant table for their gene families and taxa of interest can clone and modify [31] to easily share their results.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Total number of ARF sequences identified by CDART in legumes. Blue circles shows the number of ARF genes in each species of legumes, while red circles show the number of ARF transcripts

Full size image
Table 1 Genome-wide identification of ARF gene family in plant species using exhaustive BLAST searches and geneHummus approaches
Full size table

Comparison with existing software

To date, a number of tools and pipelines are available to analyze sequences based on gene families. These tools are excellent for the identification of sequences in whole animal genomes; however, most of them cannot be applied to plant genomes or draft genomes, and have other limitations based on the databases they query and the software they use (see Table 2).

Table 2 Currently available ortholog identification tools
Full size table

geneHummus is a flexible tool that can work with almost any gene family and almost any plant species. HomoloGene [37] is an automated system for detecting homologs among 21 completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes; however, it is not flexible enough to be applied on draft genomes. MultiMSOAR [38, 39] and OrthoMCL [40, 41] are other tools that were developed to find ortholog groups among different genomes. These tools are limited to the software version and genomes included, which does not include the chickpea genome or other legume species. Ensembl plants [42] also provides programming tools to extract target genes families, but is similarly restricted to a limited number of genomes and the sequences that are hosted by the browser. While these tools are excellent for their intended purposes, they cannot meet the needs of plant geneticists interested in identifying conserved protein architectures.

geneHummus goes beyond existing tools in several ways. It identifies sequences for performing further analysis by searching for protein architectures from NCBI data, and then retrieving the gene family without requiring downloading of the gene or protein sequences. It uses the latest updated reference sequences, and is therefore more comprehensive in both the breadth of species and families covered for whole and partial genomes, as well as more accurate than static databases. Although geneHummus requires the end user to have a minimal familiarity with the R programming language, through the sequential call of four functions, the pipeline identifies the given gene family in a user-friendly and rapid environment. Provided that sequences are hosted by GenBank, the major advantage of geneHummus is that the user can apply it on the fly for any genome and it can be customized to be suitable for other agronomically important taxonomic families beyond legumes. For example, when installing the package, the user has access to several objects that contain the taxonomy ids for the families Brassicaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Rosaceae, and Solanaceae. This can be also customized for other families, which in practical terms makes geneHummus a useful tool for the plant research community. A summary of the above statements can be seen in Table 2.

Phylogenetic analysis

Numerous downstream analyses and applications can be performed on geneHummus results. One example is phylogenetic analysis. Based on the conserved domains of ARF proteins, we explored and depicted the sequence relationships between the whole dataset. Two ARF proteins from the gymnosperm lineage were included as outgroup species. Gymnosperms have been resolved as the sister group of angiosperms. They diverged from their most recent common ancestor ~ 310 million years ago [43]. The phylogenetic distribution of the protein sequences revealed that all ARF sequences fall into two major groups (I and II) with well-supported bootstrap values (Fig. 4). The group I is the most numerous and may be further subdivided into clusters containing orthologs of the Arabidopsis sequences defining the well-known clades AtARF3/4-like, ARF12-like, ARF10/16-like, and ARF17-like [32]. Group II contain the cluster AtARF5-like. A second cluster in group II did not contain any Arabidopsis ortholog (data not shown) implying that this clade was derived through a long-term evolution for conserved functions across legume plant species. We labeled as sister pairs those proteins clustered together based on high bootstrap values (> 65%). Related to sister pairs involving chickpea, the phylogeny structures 8 sister pairs (seven pairs of C. arietinum-M. truncatula and one pair of C. arietinum-L. angustifolius). We did not observe any sister pair between two chickpea ARF proteins. This is an interesting evolutionary pattern. Chickpea diverged from M. truncatula ~ 10–20 million years ago [14]. Lack of chickpea sister pairs suggests that recent duplications (after chickpea and Medicago separated) have played a very limited role, if any, in the expansion of the ARF chickpea family, or that duplicated proteins did not change much since both species shared a common ancestor. Both hypothesis are plausible as well.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analysis of phylogenetic relationships of ARF legume proteins. Phylogenetic analysis revealed two major clusters from the ARF lineage, one of which could be further subdivided into 6 clades The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Clades are named based on the phylogeny of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana

Full size image

In addition, within the AtARF12-like group we observed a distinct clade made of 4 proteins based on bootstrap value, belonging to the ancestors of the cultivated peanut [44]. This suggests that these are orthologs of an ancestral gene emerged after the speciation of Arachis genus (Additional file 2: Figure S2). We are looking forward to the peanut genome becoming public so we can validate these results.

Expression profiles for gene discovery

Another useful application that geneHummus results could be used for is identifying genes of interest in transcriptomic experiments and their role in responding to environmental perturbations. We used the genes identified by geneHummus as a reference database to study their expression in drought conditions using freely available SRA data and the Magic-BLAST tool [24]. We identified datasets in the SRA that isolated sequences from the root of the chickpea plant grown in either drought or control conditions, and was identified as belonging to either a tolerant/drought or susceptible/drought strain. Upon analysis, we identified 3 transcripts that were differentially expressed in the drought-tolerant strain in drought conditions as opposed to the drought-susceptible strain (Fig. 5). This ARFs could be important targets for the genetic improvement of chickpea via conventional breeding or biotechnological approaches.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Differential abundance of ARF gene loci in Cicer arietinum under drought or normal conditions. Drought samples are clustered on the top, while control samples are clustered on the bottom

Full size image

Conclusions

Applying the geneHummus pipeline, we characterized the structure and phylogeny of the whole ARF proteins dataset in the legume family. As a case study, we also characterized the expression profile of the gene family in Cicer arietinum. The utility of this pipeline stems from a reduction in hands-on annotation time combined with high specificity and sensitivity in extracting proteins from the RefSeq database and providing interaction with the suite of other NCBI tools such as the conserved domain architectures based on the recently developed NCBI resources SPARCLE and the aligner Magic-BLAST. geneHummus is a powerful tool for the identification of gene family sequences that could be used in phylogenetic analysis. Our results indicates that most proteins are very well conserved across genera, with abundant multi-species clades. This suggests that these proteins are involved in common basic cellular actions. This orthology information could be used to infer the function of a previously uncharacterized protein in a given species based on the known function of the protein in another genera. This is a particularly strong approach for comparative genomics. Once the sequences have been identified, given the ability of available SRA libraries for a number of tissues and conditions, the user can get the most out of the pipeline by using Magic-BLAST-based differential expression analysis to identify genes of interest for certain conditions. This tool will help investigators discover genes, and has particular applicability to plant breeding programs, among other applications. Our pipeline has been suitable for ARF family detection on all plant Genomes tested, and should be suitable for other gene families, vastly improving the speed and ease of genomic data processing.

Availability and requirements

Project name: geneHummus.

Project home page: https://github.com/NCBI-Hackathons/GeneHummus

Operating system(s): Platform independent.

Programming language: R.

Other requirements: R 3.5.0 or higher.

License: MIT license.

Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the geneHummus repository, https://github.com/NCBI-Hackathons/GeneHummus

Abbreviations

ARF:

Auxin receptor factor

BLAST:

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

HMM:

Hidden Markov model

MSA:

Multiple sequence alignment

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

SPARCLE:

Subfamily Protein Architecture Labeling Engine

SRA:

Sequence Read Archive

References

  1. Cook CE, Bergman MT, Finn RD, Cochrane G, Birney E, Apweiler R. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: Data growth and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D20–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitch WM. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet. 2000;16:227–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Finet C, Berne-Dedieu A, Scutt CP, Marlétaz F. Evolution of the ARF gene family in land plants: old domains, new tricks. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Die JV, Gil J, Millan T. Genome-wide identification of the auxin response factor gene family in Cicer arietinum. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4695-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen C, Yue R, Sun T, Zhang L, Xu L, Tie S, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of auxin response factor gene family in Medicago truncatula. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Y, Wang C, Wang N, Jiang X, Mao H, Zhu C, et al. Manipulation of Auxin Response Factor 19 affects seed size in the woody perennial Jatropha curcas. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40844. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Li H, Ran K, Sun Q. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of peach auxin response factor gene families. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2016;25:349–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-015-0346-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baranwal VK, Negi N, Khurana P. Auxin response factor genes repertoire in mulberry: identification, and structural, functional and evolutionary analyses. Genes (Basel). 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8090202.

  10. Kalluri UC, Difazio SP, Brunner AM, Tuskan GA. Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones B, Frasse P, Olmos E, Zegzouti H, Li ZG, Latché A, et al. Down-regulation of DR12, an auxin-response-factor homolog, in the tomato results in a pleiotropic phenotype including dark green and blotchy ripening fruit. Plant J. 2002;32:603–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01450.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu K, Yuan C, Li H, Lin W, Yang Y, Shen C, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of auxin response factor (ARF) family genes related to flower and fruit development in papaya (Carica papaya L.). BMC Genomics. 2015;16:901. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2182-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu Z, Ji A, Song J, Chen S. Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor gene family members in medicinal model plant Salvia miltiorrhiza. Biol Open. 2016;5:848–57. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.017178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Varshney RK, Song C, Saxena RK, Azam S, Yu S, Sharpe AG, et al. Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:240–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A Grammar of Data Manipulation [R package dplyr version 0.8.0.1]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dplyr/index.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2019.

  17. Wickham H. Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations [R package stringr version 1.4.0].

  18. Winter D. “Entrez” in R [R package rentrez version 1.2.1].

  19. Hornik K. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. WIREs Comp Stat. 2012;4:394–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. geneHummus Github repository. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NCBI-Hackathons/GeneHummus/master/tutorial.md. Accessed 9 Apr 2019.

  21. Federhen S. The NCBI Taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D136–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuraku S, Zmasek CM, Nishimura O, Katoh K. aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41 Web Server issue:W22–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinformatics. 2017:bbx108. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108.

  24. Boratyn GM, Thierry-Mieg J, Thierry-Mieg D, Busby B, Madden TL. Magic-BLAST, an accurate DNA and RNA-seq aligner for long and short reads. BioRxiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/390013.

  25. SimpleGeneExpression Github repository. https://github.com/NCBI-Hackathons/SimpleGeneExpression. Accessed 11 Apr 2019.

  26. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D200–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D733–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hane JK, Ming Y, Kamphuis LG, Nelson MN, Garg G, Atkins CA, et al. A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant-microbe interactions and legume evolution. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15:318–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ha CV, Le DT, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Sulieman S, Tran UT, et al. The auxin response factor transcription factor family in soybean: genome-wide identification and expression analyses during development and water stress. DNA Res. 2013;20:511–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shiny app of ARFs in legume species. https://genehummus.shinyapps.io/testshiny/. Accessed 11 Apr 2019.

  31. Shiny app Github repository. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NCBI-Hackathons/GeneHummus/R_package/Shiny.R. Accessed 11 Apr 2019.

  32. Okushima Y, Overvoorde PJ, Arima K, Alonso JM, Chan A, Chang C, et al. Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell. 2005;17:444–63. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.028316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu H, Soler M, Mila I, San Clemente H, Savelli B, Dunand C, et al. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) gene family in Eucalyptus grandis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mun J-H, Yu H-J, Shin JY, Oh M, Hwang H-J, Chung H. Auxin response factor gene family in Brassica rapa: genomic organization, divergence, expression, and evolution. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012;287:765–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-012-0718-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar R, Tyagi AK, Sharma AK. Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family from tomato and analysis of their role in flower and fruit development. Mol Genet Genomics. 2011;285:245–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-011-0602-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wan S, Li W, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Huang W, Zhan J. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the auxin response factor gene family in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:1365–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1622-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen X, Zheng J, Fu Z, Nan P, Zhong Y, Lonardi S, et al. Assignment of orthologous genes via genome rearrangement. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2005;2:302–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2005.48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi G, Peng M-C, Jiang T. MultiMSOAR 2.0: an accurate tool to identify ortholog groups among multiple genomes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13:2178–89. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1224503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fischer S, Brunk BP, Chen F, Gao X, Harb OS, Iodice JB, et al. Using OrthoMCL to assign proteins to OrthoMCL-DB groups or to cluster proteomes into new ortholog groups. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2011;Chapter 6:Unit 6:12.1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0612s35.

  42. Kersey PJ, Allen JE, Allot A, Barba M, Boddu S, Bolt BJ, et al. Ensembl Genomes 2018: an integrated omics infrastructure for non-vertebrate species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D802–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Z, Baniaga AE, Sessa EB, Scascitelli M, Graham SW, Rieseberg LH, et al. Early genome duplications in conifers and other seed plants. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1501084. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bertioli DJ, Cannon SB, Froenicke L, Huang G, Farmer AD, Cannon EKS, et al. The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat Genet. 2016;48:438–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jose Blanca (COMAV, Valencia) for his comments on functions. We would like to thank Greg Boratyn, Aaron Marchler-Bauer and Lewis Geer from NCBI Magic-BLAST and SPARCLE, and Jonathan Kans, the author of EDirect, and Steve Tsang for helpful discussions. We would also like to thank Dan Smith, the lead administrator of the NCBI visiting bioinformatics program.

Funding

This work was funded by the intramural research program of the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health. Funders were not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics ETSIAM, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain

    Jose V. Die

  2. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA

    Jose V. Die, Moamen M. Elmassry, Olaitan I. Awe, Allissa Dillman & Ben Busby

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, TX, Lubbock, 79409, USA

    Moamen M. Elmassry

  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Kimberly H. LeBlanc

  5. Department of Computer Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Olaitan I. Awe

Authors
  1. Jose V. Die
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moamen M. Elmassry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kimberly H. LeBlanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olaitan I. Awe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Allissa Dillman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ben Busby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JVD and MME participated in the design of the study, performed the bioinformatics and statistical analyses, generated figures and drafted the manuscript. KHL made substantial contributions to the bioinformatics analysis and the manuscript draft. OIA made contributions to the bioinformatics analysis and the manuscript draft and editing. AD made contributions to the bioinformatics analysis. BB supervised the project and contributed to the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Busby.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article was prepared while Kimberly LeBlanc was a visiting bioinformatician at NCBI. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Approaches for identification of gene families. a. Exhaustive identification based on BLAST searches. Sequences from a close-related species are used as queries using BLAST to identify the corresponding gene members in a target genome. For validation, sequences from a second model organism are also commonly used as queries following the same procedure. The hidden Markov model profiles of the gene family is used to confirm the identity of the candidate genes. b. Automatic pipeline implemented in geneHummus. The defining conserved domains of the gene family are used to parse the SPARCLE database and retrieve sequences grouped by a given protein architecture. (JPEG 199 kb)

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. Cluster from clade AtARF12-like containing Arachis specific ARFs. (TIFF 1501 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Die, J.V., Elmassry, M.M., LeBlanc, K.H. et al. geneHummus: an R package to define gene families and their expression in legumes and beyond. BMC Genomics 20, 591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5952-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5952-2

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us