Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of ovarian follicles reveal the role of VLDLR in chicken follicle selection

BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 486 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Follicle selection in chickens refers to the process of selecting one follicle from a group of small yellow follicles (SY, 6–8 mm in diameter) for development into 12–15 mm hierarchical follicles (usually F6 follicles), which is an important process affecting laying performance in the poultry industry. Although transcriptomic analysis of chicken ovarian follicles has been reported, integrated analysis of chicken follicles for selection by using both transcriptomic and proteomic approaches is still rarely performed. In this study, we compared the proteomes and transcriptomes of SY and F6 follicles in laying hens and identified several genes involved in chicken follicle selection.

Results

Transcriptomic analysis revealed 855 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SY follicles and F6 follicles in laying hens, among which 202 were upregulated and 653 were downregulated. Proteomic analysis revealed 259 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), including 175 upregulated and 84 downregulated proteins. Among the identified DEGs and DEPs, changes in the expression of seven genes, including VLDLR1, WIF1, NGFR, AMH, BMP15, GDF6 and MMP13, and nine proteins, including VLDLR, VTG1, VTG3, PSCA, APOB, APOV1, F10, ZP2 and ZP3L2, were validated. Further analysis indicated that the mRNA level of chicken VLDLR was higher in F6 follicles than in SY follicles and was also higher in granulosa cells (GCs) than in thecal cells (TCs), and it was stimulated by FSH in GCs.

Conclusions

By comparing the proteomes and transcriptomes of SY and F6 follicles in laying hens, we identified several differentially expressed proteins/genes that might play certain roles in chicken follicle selection. These data may contribute to the identification of functional genes and proteins involved in chicken follicle selection.

Background

The ovary is a dynamic organ and a pivotal component of the reproductive system in hens. In the abdomen of laying hens, ovarian follicles of various sizes exist, including small white follicles that are less than 3 mm in diameter, large white follicles that are 3–5 mm in diameter, small yellow (SY) follicles that are 6–8 mm in diameter, large yellow follicles that are 9–12 mm in diameter and five to six hierarchical follicles of increased sizes, i.e., F6 to F1 [1]. Follicle selection in reproductively active domestic hens refers to the daily collection of one follicle from a pool of 6–8 mm small yellow follicles, which becomes a hierarchical follicle [2] and continues to develop rapidly from the F6 follicle stage to the F1 follicle stage until ovulation. In the process of chicken follicle selection, granulosa cells rapidly proliferate and differentiate to produce high levels of progesterone [3, 4], and vitellin synthesized by the liver enters oocytes via the very low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) [5, 6].

Changes in the transcripts involved in steroidogenesis, paracrine signaling and transcription during the early stage of follicular growth and development were identified by transcriptome analysis [7]. Comparison among the transcriptomes of small white, F1 and postovulatory chicken follicles identified differentially expressed genes that are involved in the adhesion, apoptosis and steroid biosynthesis pathways [8]. Candidate genes, including ANXA2, Wnt4 and transforming growth factor genes, were shown to play several roles in chicken follicle growth [9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, the dynamics of the transcriptome during chicken follicle development from the SY follicle to the F6 follicle are unclear.

In addition, the mRNA abundance may not accurately predict the quantities of the corresponding functional proteins, while a proteomic approach can provide a systemic overview of protein levels [15]; therefore, a proteomic approach has certain advantages over mRNA expression profiling [16]. Proteomic analyses of ovarian function [17] and maturation of oocytes [18], such as polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and cancer [19], in human ovarian diseases and early embryonic development [20,21,22] in mammals were reported, while in chicken, 2889 proteins were identified in the white yolk and ovarian stroma of small white follicles in Bovan’s white laying hen [23]. However, the temporal changes in the proteome during chicken follicle selection are unknown. In this study, we compared the proteomes and transcriptomes of 6–8 mm SY follicles and the smallest hierarchical follicles (F6) in laying hens and found several differentially expressed genes/proteins (DEGs/DEPs) that might play certain roles in chicken follicle selection.

Results

Transcriptomic analysis

RNA-seq was used to compare the transcriptomes of three SY follicles and three of the smallest hierarchical follicles (F6), which are referred to here as S1, S2, and S3 and F1, F2 and F3, respectively. High-throughput RNA-seq generated 61.66 Gb of clean data from the six samples of chicken follicles, and 91.07–93.42% of the reads could be mapped to the chicken genome. For all six samples, at least 93.55% of the reads were equal to or exceeded Q30 (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of the RNA-seq metrics for chicken follicles
Full size table

A total of 855 DEGs, including 202 upregulated and 653 downregulated genes, were identified between the SY follicles (S) and F6 follicles (F) according to the significance criteria of |log2 (FoldChange)| > 1 and padj < 0.05 (Fig. 1a). A hierarchical clustered map of DEGs was then constructed and is shown in Fig. 1b. Detailed analysis of the top 10 up−/downregulated DEGs is shown in Table 2. The entire list of DEGs is shown in Table S1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Transcriptome profile comparison between SY follicles (S) and F6 follicles (F). a Volcano plot of all the genes detected in six chicken follicle samples. Green spots represent downregulation, and red spots represent upregulation. b Hierarchical clustering analysis of DEGs between F and S. c GO enrichment of DEGs from the F and S transcriptomes. d KEGG signaling pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs

Full size image
Table 2 The top 10 up- and downregulated genes of chicken F6 vs SY follicles
Full size table

The DEGs were then assessed by GO and KEGG pathway analyses. The GO functional analysis revealed that most of the DEGs were involved in circulatory system processes, cell differentiation and transition metal ion binding (Fig. 1c). KEGG pathway analysis of the DEGs showed that the most enriched pathways were those involved in TGF-β signaling, tyrosine metabolism and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions (Fig. 1d).

To validate the RNA-seq data, seven DEGs (Table S2), including very low density lipoprotein receptor 1 (VLDLR1), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), WNT inhibitory factor 1 (WIF1), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), bone morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15), growth differentiation factor 6 (GDF6) and matrix metallopeptidase 13 (MMP13), were chosen and quantified by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The results showed that the mRNA levels of these genes were similar to those revealed by the sequencing data, suggesting that the RNA-seq results were reliable (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The mRNA expression levels of genes examined by qRT-PCR. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05

Full size image

Proteomics analysis

The proteins from three SY follicles and three of the smallest hierarchical follicles (F6) that were used for the above transcriptome analysis, i.e., the S1, S2, and S3 and F1, F2 and F3 follicles, were used for TMT labeling and HPLC fractionation followed by LC-MS/MS analysis. The first step was to validate the MS data. The distribution of the mass error was close to zero, and most of the absolute values were less than 5 ppm, which meant that the mass accuracy of the MS data was compliant with the requirements (Fig. 3a). The length of most peptides was between eight and 16 amino acids, which was in agreement with the general characteristics of tryptic peptides (Fig. 3b). In this study, a total of 5883 proteins were identified in the samples, and 5236 proteins were quantified. According to the relative levels, the quantified proteins were divided into two categories: proteins with a quantitative ratio over 1.5 were considered upregulated, and proteins with a quantitative ratio less than 1/1.5 were considered downregulated (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c). In the F6 follicles, the levels of 175 and 84 proteins were significantly increased and decreased, respectively, compared with those in the SY follicles. A detailed analysis of the top 10 up−/downregulated differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) is shown in Table 3. The entire list of DEPs is shown in Table S3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TMT analysis of the DEP data for the chicken F6 and SY follicles. a Mass error distribution of all identified peptides. b The length distribution of the majority of the peptides. c Volcano plots of -log10 (P value) versus log2 (expression level) in the F6 vs SY follicles. d KEGG signal pathway enrichment analysis of the DEPs

Full size image
Table 3 Top 10 up- and downregulated proteins in chicken F6 vs SY follicles
Full size table

The pathways of the DEPs were constructed using KEGG software. Several important pathways were enriched in the F6 follicles compared with the SY follicles (Fig. 3d), including pathways involved in the ribosome, neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions and cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions.

Nine DEPs were randomly selected for parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) analysis to verify the accuracy of the proteome analysis by LC-MS/MS, including apovitellenin-1 (APO1), apolipoprotein B (APOB), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), coagulation factor X (F10), vitellogenin-1 (VTG1) and vitellogenin-3 (VTG3); all of these proteins were significantly increased in F6 follicles, and zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 2 (ZP2), zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 3 (ZP3) and very low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) were significantly decreased in F6 follicles (Table 4). The PRM results (Fig. 4) showed that the relative abundances of the peptides from the nine selected individual proteins were consistent with the proteome data.

Table 4 Nine proteins selected for the parallel reaction monitoring analysis of the chicken follicle proteome data
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

The histogram of the nine significantly abundant proteins in F6 follicles (F) vs SY follicles (S) according to PRM (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Transcriptome and proteome association analysis

The association analysis of the proteomic and transcriptomic data of the F6 and SY follicles revealed a weak relationship between protein and mRNA expression with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.23 (Fig. 5a). The number of items for which “Transcript up and Protein up” and “Transcript down and Protein down” was 14 (1.3%) and 26 (2.4%), respectively (Fig. 5b). To further understand the relationship between transcripts and proteins, we compared the intersection between DEGs and DEPs (Fig. 6). Most genes were significantly expressed at the mRNA level but not at the protein level. At both the protein and mRNA levels, 14 and 26 genes were revealed as significantly up- and downregulated in SY follicles compared with F6 follicles, respectively. In addition, the expression of two genes were inconsistent in terms of changes in the mRNA levels and protein levels. Table 5 shows the specific regulation information for several genes at the mRNA and protein levels. The specific comparative analysis results are shown in Table S4.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Association analysis (a) and Venn diagram (b) of differentially expressed genes/proteins from the TMT and DEG analyses between F6 and SY follicles in laying hens

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Dynamics of the expression of chicken VLDLR mRNA and the effect of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment on the VLDLR mRNA levels in the granulosa cells (GCs) of chicken ovarian follicles. a Expression of VLDLR mRNA in different chicken tissues. b Expression levels of VLDLR in 1–2 mm follicles, 6–8 mm follicles (small yellow follicles), the fifth largest follicles (F5), the third largest follicles (F3), the largest follicles (F1), and the new postovulatory follicles (POFs). c Expression of chicken VLDLR in the granulosa cells (pre-GCs) and theca cells (pre-TCs) of prehierarchical follicles and the GCs and TCs of hierarchical follicles. d Effect of FSH on VLDLR in the GCs of prehierarchical follicles. e Effect of FSH on VLDLR in the GCs of hierarchical follicles. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (abcP < 0.05; ABCP < 0.01)

Full size image
Table 5 Differentially expressed genes at both the mRNA and protein levels between SY and F6 follicles in chicken
Full size table

Dynamics and regulation of VLDLR mRNA by FSH

Both transcriptomic and proteomic analyses indicated that VLDLR expression was significantly downregulated in F6 follicles compared with SY follicles; therefore, we further analyzed the expression of VLDLR mRNA in chicken tissues and found that it was predominantly expressed in the ovary (Fig. 6a), and VLDLR expression in the prehierarchical follicles was significantly higher than that in the hierarchical follicles (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6b). In both the hierarchical and prehierarchical follicles, the VLDLR mRNA expression was significantly higher in the granulosa cells (GCs) than in the thecal cells (TCs) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6c). Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment stimulated the expression of VLDLR in the GCs, in prehierarchical follicles, the effect was not significant at concentrations of ≤10 ng/ml (Fig. 6d). However, FSH treatment stimulated the expression of VLDLR in the GCs of hierarchical follicles in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6e).

Discussion

Follicle selection is an important stage of follicle development that affects many egg production traits in the poultry industry. The mechanism of follicle selection in chickens is becoming a hot topic of research in poultry reproduction biology. Previous studies revealed the effect of Wnt4 [9], bone morphogenetic protein 4 [11], BMP15 [12], AMH [24], vasoactive intestinal peptide [25] and parathyroid hormone-like hormone [26] on chicken follicle selection and the changes in the RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation profile [27] during chicken follicle selection; however, high-throughput screening of functional genes at the protein level involved in chicken follicle selection is lacking. Therefore, in this study, by combined analysis of changes in the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of follicles prior to and post selection in chickens, we revealed several DEGs and DEPs, including VLDLR, that may play important roles in chicken follicle selection.

At both the mRNA and protein levels, the expression of VLDLR, NGFR and WIF1 were significantly downregulated in chicken F6 follicles compared with that in SY follicles. During chicken follicle selection, VLDLR plays a pivotal role in the absorption of vitelin by oocytes, and without VLDLR, oocytes are unable to enter the rapid growth stage of follicle development [28]. During the development of the small white follicle, VLDLR migrates to the follicular wall, enabling the endocytosis of vitellogenin into the yolk, followed by follicular differentiation [7]. Studies have revealed that the expressed variant of VLDLR in chicken granulosa cells differs from the variant expressed in the oocyte, which contains an O-linked sugar domain (VLDLR 1) [29, 30], and the reduced level of VLDLR in granulosa cells is suggested to allow more VLDLR to reach the oocytes by passing through intercellular gaps rather than via receptor-mediated endocytosis into granulosa cells [31]. In this study, we provided further evidence that after follicle selection, the expression of VLDLR was significantly decreased. Moreover, we found that VLDLR is mainly expressed in chicken ovaries, SW and SY follicles and the GCs of prehierarchical follicles, and its expression was stimulated by FSH in the GCs, especially in those of hierarchical follicles. These data collectively suggest that, after follicle selection, the decreased expression of VLDLR in GCs might allow more VLDLR 1 to be expressed on the oocyte membrane, thus promoting the rapid growth of hierarchical follicles. Similarly, in geese, the expression of VLDLR mRNA is decreased concomitant with an increase in the follicular diameter [32]. For NGFR, in human mural and cumulus granulosa cells, the nerve growth factor receptor tropomyosin-related kinase A (TrkA) mRNA level was strongly correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, and the number of oocytes retrieved was greater among women with a low p75(NTR)/TrkA ratio [33]. The role of WIF1 has not been reported in ovarian function or follicle growth. The function of NGFR and WIF1 in chicken follicle selection requires further investigation.

Hundreds of DEGs were identified by transcriptome comparison between SY and F6 follicles during chicken follicle selection. Among these DEGs, the expression of AMH and BMP15 was greatly decreased in F6 follicles compared with that in SY follicles. Similar dynamics for AMH and BMP15 expression were previously reported; AMH is mainly expressed in granulosa cells of 1–5 mm follicles in the early stage of follicular development [1] and is decreased in follicles after selection [24], while BMP15 may promote follicle selection and affect granulosa cell proliferation and steroidogenesis in hens [12].

Among the 259 DEPs identified by global proteome analysis of chicken SY and F6 follicles, the following proteins may play certain roles in chicken follicle selection. APO1 is one of five apoproteins that forms low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and is expressed in the egg yolk and vitelline membrane [34, 35]. APOB is the major apolipoprotein in very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL and is a ligand for LDL receptors. The increased expression of APOV1 and APOB in F6 follicles is consistent with higher yolk incorporation after follicle selection. Vitellogenins are yolk precursor proteins produced by the liver and are essential for the growth of chicken ovarian follicles, and they circulate in the bloodstream until a follicle enters the stage of vitellogenesis, which triggers endocytosis of vitellogenins and transport into the yolk [6]. Vitellogenins 1, 2, and 3 were found in chicken egg yolk plasma and granules [35]. The increased expression of VTG1 and VTG3 in F6 follicles found in this study suggests that yolk deposition is active in F6 follicles. The zona pellucida (ZP) is a specialized extracellular matrix that surrounds the oocyte and early embryo and is composed of three or four glycoproteins, including zona pellucida sperm-binding proteins 1–4 (ZP1–4), with various functions in oogenesis and fertilization [36]. ZP3 has been shown to promote oocyte maturation in pigs [37]. In this study, we found that the expression levels of ZP2 and ZP3 were decreased to approximately half of the level found in F6 follicles; the mechanism of this process in follicle selection requires further study.

In this study, by association analysis between the transcriptome and the proteome, we found that the expression changes of most genes are inconsistent at the mRNA and protein levels, which is in line with the results of other studies showing that most genes can exhibit differential expression at the transcript and protein levels [38, 39], and this suggests that it is necessary to analyze the functions of genes at both levels.

Conclusions

By comparing the transcriptomes and proteomes of SY follicles and F6 follicles in laying hens, this study revealed 855 DEGs and 259 DEPs. The possible functional significance of several DEGs and DEPs, including VLDLR, was further discussed. These data may contribute to the identification of the functional genes and proteins involved in chicken follicular development and selection.

Methods

Tissue collection

Fifteen randomly sampled Hy-line brown hens from the same batch, which had been laying regularly for at least 1 month (28 weeks old, with a mean body weight of 2.1 ± 0.12 kg) and were housed under standard conditions with free access to food and water, were divided into three biological groups, each containing five hens. Vaccination was performed according to the recommendations from Hy-line International. The experimental hens were killed by cervical dislocation after approximately 10 h after laying, the time of which was individually recorded. From each hen, small yellow follicles (6–8 mm in diameter, SY) and smallest hierarchical follicle (12–15 mm in diameter, F6) were separately collected, and the egg yolk was carefully squeezed out with tweezers, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA), immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and used for transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Shandong Agricultural University reviewed and approved all procedures described in this study. This study was performed according to the Guidelines for Experimental Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China. Three biological replicates were prepared for the transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of total RNA and proteins.

Transcriptome analysis

Total RNA was isolated from follicles and follicular granulosa and thecal cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The purity and integrity of total RNA were checked using the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, CA, USA) and the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), respectively. Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. The library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq platform. Clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N and low quality reads from raw data. The index of the reference genome was built and the paired-end clean reads were aligned to the Gallus gallus genome (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/000/002/315/GCF_000002315.6_GRCg6a/) using Hisat2 v2.0.5 [40]. Gene expression level was quantified with featureCounts v1.5.0-p3 and FPKM [41].

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SY and F6 follicles were identified according to the cretiera of adjusted P-value < 0.05 and a |log2FoldChange| > 1 according to DESeq2 [42]. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the DEGs were implemented by the cluster Profiler R package, and genes with P-values less than 0.05 were considered significantly enriched as differentially expressed [43]. The transcriptome data have been deposited with the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/docs/) under accession number SRP236909.

Sample processing and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

The proteins in the tissues were extracted with lysis buffer containing 8 M urea (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Merck Millipore, MA, USA), their concentration was determined with a BCA kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein enzymolysis was performed using trypsin (Promega, WI, USA). The peptides were desalted on a Strata X C18 SPE column (Phenomenex, CA, USA) and vacuum-dried after trypsin digestion, reconstituted in 0.5 M TEAB and processed according to the manufacturer’s protocol for the TMT kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA). The tryptic peptides were fractionated by high-pH reverse-phase HPLC using an Agilent 300 Extend C 18 column (5 μm particle size, 4.6 mm ID, 250 mm length), dissolved in 0.1% formic acid (Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) (solvent A) and separated using EASY-nLC 1000 ultra-high performance liquid phase system. Finally, peptides that were separated were exposed to an NSI source followed by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with a Q Exactive™ Plus spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA) coupled online to the UPLC system.

The resulting MS/MS data were processed using the Maxquant search engine (v.1.5.2.8). The tandem mass spectra were searched against the Gallus gallus database (http://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000000539, chicken proteome ID: UP000000539) concatenated with the reverse decoy database. The GO proteome was derived from the UniProt-GOA database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/). The KEGG database was used to identify the enriched pathways. Proteins with a threshold of P < 0.05 and a fold change of > 1.5 or < 1/1.5 were identified as differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between SY and F6 follicles. The MS proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org/) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011470 (Username: reviewer39674@ebi.ac.uk, Password: AfwLJZRb).

Parallel reaction monitoring

PRM used to validate protein abundance levels of APO1, APOB, PSCA, F10, VTG1 and VTG3 that were significantly increased in F6 follicles, and ZP2, ZP3 and VLDLR that were significantly decreased in F6 follicles obtained from TMT analysis. PRM analysis was carried out at the Jingjie PTM BioLab Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) with experimental steps and parameter settings used according to the reference [44].

Cell culture and cell treatment

Granulosa and thecal cells were prepared according to references [14, 45], respectively. Firstly, the yolk was carefully removed with ophthalmic forceps. Then, small yellow follicles were digested with 0.1% collagenase II (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) at 38 °C for 15 min to obtain the pre-GCs, for additional 30 min to obtain the pre-TCs. For hierarchical follicles, after the removal of yolk, granulosa cells were firstly separated from the theca externa cells with ophthalmic forceps, followed by treatent with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco-BRL, NY, USA) at 38 °C for 15 min, while the thecal cells were obtained by digesting the theca externa and interna with 0.1% collagenase II at 38 °C for 30 min. After centrifugation, the cells were suspended in culture medium containing M199 (Gibco-BRL, NY, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and subsequently seeded at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well in 24-well culture plates and cultured at 38 °C in a water-saturated atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. The number of viable cells was estimated using Trypan blue staining. After 24 h, cultured granulosa cells were treated with different concentrations (0, 5, 10, and 50 ng/ml) of recombinant FSH (R&D Systems, MN, USA). All the treated cells were collected after another 24 h for RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from chicken ovarian follicles that were also used for proteome analysis using TRIzol reagent (InvivoGen, CA, USA). Synthesis of the cDNA was performed using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit with 1 μg of the RNA pretreated with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time quantitative PCR of the mRNA expression level of VLDLR, VLDLR1, WIF1, NGFR, AMH, BMP15, GDF6 and MMP13 was performed using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with primers listed in Table S5 on a Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing and extension at 58 °C for 20 s. The melting curves were obtained, and quantitative analysis of the data was performed using the 2−ΔΔCT relative quantification method [46]. Quantification was performed by standardizing the reaction results versus those of β-actin.

Statistical analysis

Differences in mRNA expression between follicles and follicular cells were evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05) using the General Linear Model procedure in SAS (version 9.2). For one experiment, each treatment was repeated four times, and at least three independent experiments were performed. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The GO and KEGG analyses were performed by using Fisher’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Availability of data and materials

The reference genome (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/000/002/315/GCF_000002315.6_GRCg6a/) and proteome (http://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/ UP000000539, chicken proteome ID: UP000000539) database of the Gallus gallus were used in this study. The transcriptome data have been deposited with the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/docs/) under accession number SRP236909. The MS proteomics data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org/) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD011470 (Username: reviewer39674@ebi.ac.uk, Password: AfwLJZRb).

Abbreviations

BP:

Biological process

CC:

Cellular component

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

DEPs:

Differentially expressed proteins

GO:

Gene ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GCs:

granulosa cells

TCs:

thecal cells

References

  1. Johnson AL. Ovarian follicle selection and granulosa cell differentiation. Poult Sci. 2014;94(4):781–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Onagbesan O, Bruggeman V, Decuypere E. Intra-ovarian growth factors regulating ovarian function in avian species: a review. Anim Reprod Sci. 2009;111:121–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tilly JL, Kowalski KI, Johnson AL. Stage of ovarian follicular development associated with the initiation of steroidogenic competence in avian granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(2):305–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson AL, Woods DC. Ovarian dynamics and follicle development. In: Jamieson BGM, editor. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers, an imprint of Edenbridge Ltd. 2007; pp: 243–277 (Chapter 6).

  5. Stifani S, Barber DL, Nimpf J, Schneider W. A single chicken oocyte plasma membrane protein mediates uptake of very low density lipoprotein and vitellogenin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87:1955–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider W. Receptor-mediated mechanisms in ovarian follicle and oocyte development. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009;163:18–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz FJ, Anthony K, Halfhill AN. Early avian follicular development is characterized by changes in transcripts involved in steroidogenesis, paracrine signaling and transcription. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:212–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu G, Mao Y, Zhou W, Jiang Y. Dynamic changes in the follicular transcriptome and promoter DNA methylation pattern of steroidogenic genes in chicken follicles throughout the ovulation cycle. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0146028.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Chen Q, Liu Z, Guo X, Du Y, Yuan Z, Guo M, Sun Y, Kang L, Jiang Y. Transcriptome analysis on single small yellow follicles reveals that WNT4 is involved in chicken follicle selection. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:317.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ocón-Grove OM, Poole DH, Johnson AL. Bone morphogenetic protein 6 promotes FSH receptor and anti-müllerian hormone mRNA expression in granulosa cells from hen prehierarchal follicles. Reproduction. 2012;14:3825.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim D, Ocón-Grove O, Johnson AL. Bone morphogenetic protein 4 supports the initial differentiation of hen (Gallus gallus) granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephens CS, Johnson PA. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 may promote follicle selection in the hen. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016;235:170–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knight PG, Glister C. TGF-beta superfamily members and ovarian follicle development. Reproduction. 2016;132:191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu G, Chen X, Mao Y, Kang L, Ma X, Jiang Y. Characterization of annexin A2 in chicken follicle development: evidence for its involvement in angiogenesis. Anim Reprod Sci. 2015;161:104–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ewen K, Baker M, Wilhelm D, Aitken RJ, Koopman P. Global survey of protein expression during gonadal sex determination in mice. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:2624.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma M, Guo X, Wang F, Zhao C, Liu Z, Shi Z, Wang Y, Zhang P, Zhang K, Wang N, et al. Protein expression profile of the mouse metaphase-ii oocyte. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:4821–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Zhu YF, Guo XJ, Huo R, Ma X, Lin M, Zhou ZM, Sha JH. A two-dimensional electrophoresis reference map of human ovary. J Mol Med. 2005;83:812–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeiffer MJ, Siatkowski M, Paudel Y, Balbach ST, Baeumer N, Crosetto N, Drexler HC, Fuellen G, Boiani M. Proteomic analysis of mouse oocytes reveals 28 candidate factors of the "reprogrammome". J Proteome Res. 2011;10:2140–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Upadhyay RD, Balasinor NH, Kumar AV, Sachdeva G, Parte P, Dumasia K. Proteomics in reproductive biology: beacon for unraveling the molecular complexities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1834;2013:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Massicotte L, Coenen K, Mourot M, Sirard MA. Maternal housekeeping proteins translated during bovine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Proteomics. 2006;6:3811–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Memili E, Peddinti D, Shack LA, Nanduri B, McCarthy F, Sagirkaya H, Burgess SC. Bovine germinal vesicle oocyte and cumulus cell proteomics. Reproduction. 2007;133:1107–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peddinti D, Memili E, Burgess SC. Proteomics-based systems biology modeling of bovine germinal vesicle stage oocyte and cumulus cell interaction. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11240.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nepomuceno AI, Muddiman DC, Petitte JN. Global proteomic analysis of functional compartments in immature avian follicles using laser microdissection coupled to LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:3912–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson PA. Follicle selection in the avian ovary. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012;47(Suppl 4):283–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim D, Johnson AL. Vasoactive intestinal peptide promotes differentiation and clock gene expression in granulosa cells from prehierarchal follicles. Mol Reprod Dev. 2016;83(5):455–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo X, Wang Y, Chen Q, Yuan Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Kang L, Sun Y, Jiang Y. The role of PTHLH in ovarian follicle selection, its transcriptional regulation and genetic effects on egg laying traits in hens. Front Genet. 2019;10:430.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan Y, Zhang C, Zhu G. Profiling of RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation during follicle selection in chicken ovary. Poult Sci. 2019;98(11):6117–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nimpf J, Radosavljevic MJ, Schneider WJ. Oocytes from the mutant restricted ovulator hen lack receptor for very low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:1393–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi K, Nimpf J, Schneider WJ. Chicken oocytes and fibroblasts express different apolipoprotein-B-specific receptors. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:3131–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eresheim C, Leeb C, Buchegger P, Nimpf J. Signaling by the extracellular matrix protein reelin promotes granulosa cell proliferation in the chicken follicle. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:10182–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin X, Ma Y, Qian T, Yao J, Mi Y, Zhang C. Basic fibroblast growth factor promotes prehierarchical follicle growth and yolk deposition in the chicken. Theriogenology. 2019;139:90–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu S, Liu H, Pan Z, Xia L, Dong X, Li L, Xu F, He H, Wang J. Molecular cloning, expression profile and transcriptional modulation of two splice variants of very low density lipoprotein receptor during ovarian follicle development in geese (Anser cygnoide). Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;149:281–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buyuk E, Santoro N, Cohen HW, Charron MJ, Jindal S. Reduced neurotrophin receptor tropomyosin-related kinase a expression in human granulosa cells: a novel marker of diminishing ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):474–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mann K. Proteomic analysis of the chicken egg vitelline membrane. Proteomics. 2008;8:2322–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mann K, Mann M. The chicken egg yolk plasma and granule proteomes. Proteomics. 2010;8:178–91.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wassarman PM, Jovine L, Qi H, Williams Z, Darie C, Litscher ES. Recent aspects of mammalian fertilization research. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;234:95–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakaguchi Y, Uzuhashi R, Iwata H, Monji Y, Kuwayama T. Changes in the sperm-zona pellucida binding properties during porcine oocyte maturation. J Mammalian Ova Res. 2010;27:130–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Song J, Wang C. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of genetic factors influencing adductor muscle coloration in QN Orange scallops. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:363.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Abdulghani M, Song G, Kaur H, Walley JW, Tuteja G. Comparative analysis of the transcriptome and proteome during mouse placental development. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(5):2088–99.

  40. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R16.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ma C, Wang W, Wang Y, Sun Y, Kang L, Zhang Q, Jiang Y. TMT-labeled quantitative proteomic analyses on the longissimus dorsi to identify the proteins underlying intramuscular fat content in pigs. J Proteome. 2020;213:103630.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu G, Kang L, Wei Q, Cui X, Yang C, Jiang Y. Expression and regulation of MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-9 in ovary, follicle and granulosa cells in response to gonadotropins, sex hormones and TGF-b1 in chickens. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(3):57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank PTM-Biolabs Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) for mass spectrometry analysis and help in preparing the manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, china) for their bioinformatics supports.

Funding

This research was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31672414, 31272435, 31772588), the Funds of Shandong“Double Tops” Program (SYL2017YSTD12) and Shandong Agricultural Breed Project (2019LZGC019). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China

    Qiuyue Chen, Yiya Wang, Zemin Liu, Xiaoli Guo, Yi Sun, Li Kang & Yunliang Jiang

  2. College of Life Science, Qi Lu Normal University, Jinan, China

    Yiya Wang

Authors
  1. Qiuyue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiya Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zemin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoli Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yunliang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QC, LK and YJ designed and drafted the manuscript. QC, YW and ZL carried out animal care, prepared samples and performed the experiments. QC and XG performed the data processing and biological information analysis. YJ, LK and YS conceived the study and the experimental design and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Kang or Yunliang Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the protocols of the ‘Guidelines for Experimental Animals’ of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Beijing, China) and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee of Shandong Agricultural University (Permit Number: 2,007,005). We have obtained the informed consents of a written form from Mr. Xiaoyan Yang who was the owner of the Hy-line brown hens.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

 DEGs. (XLS 315 kb)

Additional file 2: Table S2

. Seven DEGs selected for qRT-PCR validation in chicken follicles. (DOCX 13kb)

Additional file 3: Table S3.

DEPs between F and S. (XLSX 171kb)

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Protein and Transcript quantiation combine. (XLS 35 kb)

Additional file 5: Table S5.

The primers used in the experiments. (DOCX 20kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Liu, Z. et al. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of ovarian follicles reveal the role of VLDLR in chicken follicle selection. BMC Genomics 21, 486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06855-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06855-w

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us