Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the TIFY gene family in the response to multiple stresses in Brassica napus L.

BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 736 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

TIFY is a plant-specific protein family with a diversity of functions in plant development and responses to stress and hormones, which contains JASMONATE ZIM-domain (JAZ), TIFY, PPD and ZML subfamilies. Despite extensive studies of TIFY family in many other species, TIFY has not yet been characterized in Brassica napus.

Results

In this study, we identified 77, 36 and 39 TIFY family genes in the genome of B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. Results of the phylogenetic analysis indicated the 170 TIFY proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea could be divided into 11 groups: seven JAZ groups, one PPD group, one TIFY group, and two ZIM/ZML groups. The molecular evolutionary analysis showed that TIFY genes were conserved in Brassicaceae species. Gene expression profiling and qRT-PCR revealed that different groups of BnaTIFY members have distinct spatiotemporal expression patterns in normal conditions or following treatment with different abiotic/biotic stresses and hormones. The BnaJAZ subfamily genes were predominantly expressed in roots and up-regulated by NaCl, PEG, freezing, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), salicylic acid (SA) and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in leaves, suggesting that they have a vital role in hormone signaling to regulate multiple stress tolerance in B. napus.

Conclusions

The extensive annotation and expression analysis of the BnaTIFY genes contributes to our understanding of the functions of these genes in multiple stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk in B. napus.

Background

Plants often encounter various abiotic and biotic stresses during their life cycles, such as salinity, dehydration, extreme temperature and infection by pathogens. Plant hormones, such as abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) act as key defense signals in the regulation of various abiotic and biotic stress responses [1,2,3,4]. There are many types of stress-related transcriptional factors and transcriptional regulators that function as important components in the crosstalk between hormone signals to regulate tolerance to stress in plants [5, 6].

TIFY is a plant-specific protein family with a diversity of functions in plant development and responses to stress and hormones, which is characterized by a highly conserved TIFY motif (TIF[Y/F]XG) that contains the JAZ (JASMONATE ZIM-domain), TIFY, PPD (PEAPOD) and ZIM/ZML (Zinc-finger Inflorescence Meristem: ZIM and ZIM-like) subfamilies [7, 8]. The JAZ subfamily contains a TIFY domain and a JA-associated (Jas, CCT-2) domain. The ZIM/ZML subfamily contains a TIFY domain, a CCT (CONSTANS, CO-like and TOC1) domain and a GATA zinc-finger domain [7, 9,10,11]. The Jas and CCT domains have a similar N-terminus. The TIFY subfamily proteins have only a TIFY domain. PPD subfamily proteins contain a PPD domain, a TIFY domain and a partial Jas domain that lack PY (Proline-Tyrosine) at their C-terminus region (Chung et al., [10, 12]).

In Arabidopsis, ZML1 and ZML2 are involved in the cry1-mediated photoprotective response, and the overexpression of AtTIFY1 (ZIM) produced elongated petioles and hypocotyls [13, 14]. AtTIFY4a (PPD1) and AtTIFY4b (PPD2) are involved in the synchronization of leaf growth [15, 16]. The JAZ protein is a key repressor in the plant-specific JA signaling pathway [6, 9, 11, 17, 18], which plays an important role in the resistance of plants to necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea [19], Fusarium oxysporum [20], Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [21] and Verticillium dahlia [22]. JAZ proteins that contain a Jas domain can be recognized by SCFCOI1 and degraded by the 26S proteasome [18]. The constitutive expression of JAZ proteins lacking a Jas domain confers insensitivity to JA [12, 17, 18, 23]. JAZ proteins interact with various functional types of proteins, such as transcription factors, regulators, bacterial/fungal effectors, and subsequently regulate the accumulation of anthocyanin and initiation of trichomes [24, 25], cotton fiber development [26], stamen development [27], flowering time [28, 29], tolerance to pathogen infections [22, 30, 31], insect herbivory [32] and abiotic stresses [33, 34]. For example, GhJAZ2 interacts with and represses the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcriptional factors GhbHLH171, which subsequently reduces the level of resistance to V. dahlia in cotton [22]. OsJAZ1 interacts with and represses OsbHLH148, which subsequently reduces tolerance to drought in rice [33]. JAZ1/JAZ4 physically interacts with INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION 1 (ICE1) and represses the transcriptional function of ICE1, thereby attenuating the expression of C-REPEAT BINDING FACTORS (CBFs) [34]. The overexpression of JAZ1 or JAZ4 represses the responses of Arabidopsis to freezing stress [34].

B. napus (genome AnAnCnCn) is a crucial oil crop in China and worldwide, which was formed by recent alloploidy between ancestors of B. rapa (genome ArAr) and B. oleracea (genome CoCo) [35]. Since B. napus is sensitive to environmental stress during all stages of growth and development, the production and quality of B. napus worldwide is deleteriously restricted by abiotic stresses and infection with S. sclerotiorum. Despite extensive studies of the TIFY family in many other species, including B. rapa and B. oleracea [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51], TIFY has not yet been characterized in B. napus.

To investigate the potential roles of B. napus TIFY proteins in response to phytohormone and multiple stresses, we identified 77 TIFY genes in B. napus. The putative 170 TIFY proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, were classified into 11 groups: seven JAZ groups, one TIFY group, one PPD group, and two ZIM/ZML groups. In addition, TIFY gene structures, chromosomal locations, and conserved motifs were subsequently analyzed. Gene expression analysis revealed that different groups of BnaTIFY gene family members have distinct spatiotemporal expression patterns in normal conditions or following treatment with different abiotic/biotic stresses and hormones. The JAZ subfamily members were predominantly expressed in B. napus roots, strongly induced by NaCl and PEG in roots and induced by MeJA, SA, freezing and S. sclerotiorum in leaves, suggesting that they have a vital role in hormone signaling to regulate multiple stress tolerance in B. napus.

Results

Identification of TIFY in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea

To identify all the TIFY proteins in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, we performed a BLASTp search against the annotated proteins of B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea in Ensembl Plants (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html) using the 18 Arabidopsis AtTIFY protein (12 JAZ, 1 TIFY, 2 PPD and 3 ZML) sequences as queries. A set of 77 (52 JAZ, 6 TIFY, 4 PPD and 15 ZML), 36 (26 JAZ, 2 TIFY, 2 PPD and 6 ZML) and 39 (27 JAZ, 5 TIFY, 2 PPD and 5 ZML) TIFY proteins were identified in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively (Additional file 1). There are 70, 36 and 36 proteins that contain the TIFY domain in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively, through simultaneous consideration of the conservation of the TIFY domain from an InterPro and Conserved Domain (CD)-search of the NCBI database. The predicted subcellular localizations of these proteins using ProtComp Version 9.0 revealed that most of the TIFY proteins might be located in the nucleus, with the exception of 14 proteins, including all 12 members that are homologous to TIFY9 and two members that are homologous to TIFY8 (Additional file 1). The TIFY genes in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea were named based on the homology of their coding proteins to Arabidopsis TIFY proteins (Additional file 1).

Among the 105 JAZ subfamily proteins in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, 99 were typical JAZ proteins that contained both the TIFY and Jas domains, and 41 of the JAZ have an N-terminal (NT) domain near the N-terminus in addition to the TIFY domain. All 41 NT-TIFY-Jas type JAZ proteins were homologous to AtJAZ5/6 and AtJAZ1/2. Two pairs of BnaJAZ proteins (BnaJAZ7-A3/C3 and BnaJAZ3/4-C2/A3) contained only a single Jas domain, while BnaJAZ2-A1–1 contained only an NT domain, which was located 81 bp upstream of a TIFY-Jas type BnaJAZ (BnaJAZ2-A1–2). Thus, BnaJAZ2-A1–1 and BnaJAZ2-A1–2 may be divided from a NT-TIFY-Jas type BnaJAZ. All eight BnaPPD members contained both TIFY and Jas domains. Among the 26 members of ZML subfamily, 20 were typical ZML proteins that contained (TIFY)-(CCT)-(GATA zinc-finger) domains in order, while six members contained only a single TIFY domain. Among the TIFY subfamily, eight members contained only a single TIFY domain, and five members that have no domain had been reported (Additional file 1).

Phylogenetic analysis of the TIFY proteins

To explore the classification and evolutionary characteristics of the TIFY proteins, an un-rooted phylogenetic tree based on the 170 protein sequences of B. napus (77), B. rapa (36), B. oleracea (39) and Arabidopsis (18) TIFY was constructed in MEGA X (Fig. 1). According to this phylogenetic analysis, the BnaTIFY proteins could be divided into 11 groups: seven JAZ groups, one PPD group, one TIFY group, and two ZIM/ZML groups. Interestingly, although there were six members in the ZIM group that consisted of only a single TIFY domain, a phylogenetic analysis revealed that they were not divided into TIFY groups (Additional file 1 and Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of 170 TIFY proteins from B. napus (77), B. rapa (36), B. oleracea (39) and Arabidopsis (18). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was generated by MEGA X with full-length TIFY sequences (1000 bootstrap replicates). The resulting 11 groups classified in four resulting subfamilies (JAZ, PPD, TIFY and ZIM/ZML were highlighted by red, yellow, turquoise and green, respectively) are labeled

Full size image

According to the homologous gene sets among the Ar (B. rapa), Co (B. oleracea), An- and Cn-subgenomes of B. napus, 37 Ar-Co-An-Cn pairs were identified among the 152 Bna/Br/BoTIFY genes (Additional file 1 and Fig. 1). One B. rapa JAZ gene BrJAZ5–2 (Bra030986) lacked a homologous gene in the An-subgenomes of B. napus, and 5 B. oleracea TIFY genes (BoJAZ11/12–1, BoJAZ7–2, BoJAZ8–1-2, BoTIFY8–4, and BoTIFY8–5) lacked a homologous gene in the Cn-subgenomes of B. napus. Seven B. napus TIFY genes (BnaTIFY8-A3, BnaJAZ1-C4, BnaJAZ3/4-A3, BnaZIM1-C3, BnaZIM1-A4, BnaZIM1-A5, and BnaZIM1-A6) lacked a homologous gene in B. rapa or B. oleracea (Additional file 1 and Fig. 1).

The B. napus An- and Cn-subgenomes were largely collinear to the corresponding diploid Ar and Co genomes, and most of the An-Ar and Cn-Co orthologous gene pairs demonstrated similar chromosomal locations (Additional file 2) [35]. A total of 77 BnaTIFY genes were distributed unevenly among the 19 chromosomes of B. napus and were equally distributed on the An- and Cn-subgenomes (40 and 37 genes, respectively) (Additional file 3). The distribution of TIFY genes in B. rapa and B. oleracea were similar to the distribution of orthologous BnaTIFY genes in the B. napus An- and Cn-subgenomes, respectively (Additional file 3).

Motif analysis (MEME) and gene structural analysis of TIFY

The protein sequences were analyzed using MEME to analyze the conserved motifs in the TIFY proteins, and 10 motifs were detected in 170 TIFY proteins from B. napus (77), B. rapa (36), B. oleracea (39) and Arabidopsis (18): motif 1 (TIFY domain), motif 2 (N-terminus of the Jas/CCT domain), motif 3 (NT domain), motif 4 (GATA zinc-finger domain), motif 5 (unknown domain 1), motif 6 (C-terminus of the CCT domain), motif 7 (PPD domain), motif 8 (unknown domain 2), motif 9 (TIFY domain) and motif 10 (C-terminus of the Jas domain) (Additional file 4). Motif2-motif10 forms the Jas domain, and Motif2-motif6 forms the CCT domain. According to Additional files 1 and 4 and Fig. 2b, two isoforms (motif 1 and motif 9) of the TIFY domain were identified. The motif1-type TIFY domain was the most conserved and was located in 145 TIFY members, while the motif 9-type TIFY domain was located in all 13 members in TIFY9 group. Six members from the TIFY3 group contained both motif 1 and motif 9. Additionally, the NT domain (motif 3) was only found in the TIFY10 and TIFY11 groups; motif 5 (unknown domain 1) was only found in the TIFY9 group, while motif 8 (unknown domain 2) was only found in the TIFY8 group (Additional file 1 and Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis (a), MEME analysis (b) and gene structures (c) of 170 TIFY from B. napus (77), B. rapa (36), B. oleracea (39) and Arabidopsis (18)

Full size image

To study the structural diversity of TIFY genes, the exon/intron organization of individual TIFY genes was analyzed. The number of introns ranges from 0 to 36 in TIFY genes. In general, members from a group have a similar gene structure. The detailed gene structures are shown in Fig. 2c. Compared with the homologous genes (BrZML1–1, BnaZML1-A1 and BnaZML1-C1), the BoZML1–1 gene is extraordinarily long. As shown in Additional file 5, in the homologous chromosomal regions of BoZML1–1, all have two tandem genes (BrZML1–1-Bra023899, BnaZML1-A1-BnaA01g25310D and BnaZML1-C1-BnaC01g32200D) in B. rapa and the An- and Cn-subgenomes of B. napus, respectively. A sequence analysis showed that the BoZML1–1 start codon region and its nearby areas were the same as that in third exon region of BnaZML1-C1. Additionally, in B. rapa, there were no SNPs in the regions homologous to the BnaZML1-C1 start/stop codon region and their adjacent areas (Additional file 6). The only difference was that there was an insertion (ATACG) before the first codon of the seventh exon (the region homologous to the first exon of BnaC01g32200D) (Additional file 6). We hypothesized that it could be the primary cause of different splice in region of BoZML1–1.

The core sequences of three domains in 77 BnaTIFY proteins were analyzed to explore the TIFY, Jas and CCT domains in TIFY proteins. As shown in Additional file 7, Motif 9 in the TIFY9 group also has the core sequence (TIFYXG) of TIFY domain, while there was a deletion (14th AA) in Motif 9 compared with the Motif1-type TIFY domain. Additionally, unlike Motif 9 in the TIFY9 group, Motif 9 in the TIFY3 group lacks the core sequence of TIFY domain. Notably, there were variations in the core sequence of Motif 1-type TIFY domain. The core sequence of TIFY domain in TIFY11 and TIFY3 groups was TIFF[G/R][G/S], while it was T[I/L]SF[Q/R/C]G in the ZIM/ZML group.

As shown in Additional file 8, Motif 2 was the common N-terminus of Jas and CCT domains, while motif 10 contained the core two conservative amino acid residues (PY) of the C-terminal region of Jas domain. Motif 6 contained the C-terminal region of CCT domain. Although the TIFY3/5/7/9 groups were not contained motif 10, they all contained the conservative PY residues. The PPD subfamily lacked motif 2 and the conservative PY residues. The ZIM/ZML subfamily contained motif 2 and motif 6.

To obtain a more thorough understanding of the evolutionary constraints that act on the TIFY gene family in Arabidopsis, B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus, all of the aligned sequences of TIFY cDNA and their cDNA region of the TIFY domain were used to calculate the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (Ka), the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (Ks) and the Ka/Ks ratio. The Ka/Ks ratio was < 1 for majority of the TIFY orthologues gene pairs, whether the whole cDNA sequences or only the TIFY domain regions were examined (Additional file 9). However, the TIFY domain regions had lower average Ka/Ks ratios than the whole cDNA sequences (Additional file 9). These results indicate that the majority of TIFY genes experienced purifying selection, and the TIFY domains were strongly controlled in evolution.

Expression profiling of BnaTIFY genes in different tissues and under abiotic/biotic stress and phytohormone treatments

A heatmap was drawn based on the RNA-Seq data (Additional file 10) from 12 B. napus tissues (roots, stems, leaves, buds, sepals, stamens, new pistils, mature pistils, wilting pistils, ovules, pericarps and siliques) to examine the patterns of expression of BnaTIFY in different B. napus tissues and organs. As shown in Fig. 3, the BnaTIFY genes were differentially expressed among the group in 12 tissues. All of the JAZ subfamily members were generally transcribed at higher levels than those of the other three subfamilies and were predominantly expressed in B. napus roots.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression of BnaTIFY genes in different tissues and organs. The expression levels of each gene (Log2 (FPKM values)) in each sample, as indicated by different color rectangles

Full size image

To characterize the abiotic-responsive BnaTIFY genes, the transcripts per million (TPM) value of each gene (Additional file 11) in leaves treated with cold, heat, ABA, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethylene, and SA, and in roots treated with NaCl and PEG were determined. As shown in Fig. 4, most of the JAZ subfamily members were induced by MeJA and SA in leaves and by NaCl and PEG in roots, while the PPD and ZML subfamilies were induced by heat treatment. Interestingly, almost all of the JAZ subfamily members were regulated by the circadian clock.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression of BnaTIFY genes under different abiotic stresses and plant hormones treatments. The expression levels of each gene (log2 (TPM values)) in each sample, as indicated by different color rectangles

Full size image

To detect the response of BnaTIFY genes to different low temperature stresses, the reads per kilobase of transcripts per million mapped reads (RPKM) values of each gene (Additional file 12) in leaves treated with chilling and freezing with or without cold acclimation were determined using the data from GEO (GSE129220) [52]. As shown in Fig. 5, the JAZ subfamily (TIFY11b, TIFY10a, TIFY3, TIFY5a/b, and TIFY6 groups) were strongly induced by freezing either with or without cold acclimation, while they were not induced by the chilling treatment.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of BnaTIFY genes under different low-temperature treatments. The expression levels of each gene (log2 (FPKM values)) in each sample, as indicated by different color rectangles

Full size image

S. sclerotiorum, a prototypical necrotrophic fungus, causes Sclerotinia stem rot, one of the most devastating diseases of B. napus [53]. Studies have shown that JA signaling and JAZ play important roles in the resistance of plants to necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal pathogens [21, 22]. We analyzed the patterns of expression of BnaTIFY genes in B. napus leaves infected with S. sclerotiorum (Additional file 13, data from GEO: GSE81545) [54]. Almost all of the JAZ subfamily members were strongly induced by infection with S. sclerotiorum at 24 h post inoculation (hpi) in B. napus leaves, and the change-fold (24 hpi/control) in a tolerant cultivar of B. napus (B. napus cv. Zhongyou 821) was higher than that in a susceptible one (B. napus cv. Westar) (Fig. 6), while the PPD, TIFY and ZML subfamilies were slightly or not induced by infection with S. sclerotiorum.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Expression of BnaTIFY genes in B. napus infected with S. sclerotiorum. The expression levels of each gene (log2 (FPKM values)) in each sample, as indicated by different color rectangles

Full size image

We determined the abundance of transcripts of four BnaTIFY genes (BnaJAZ1-C3, BnaJAZ6-A1, BnaJAZ9-C2, and BnaJAZ7-C3) under abiotic stresses and phytohormone treatments to confirm the results of the RNA-Seq data using qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 7, all four genes were induced by NaCl and PEG stress in roots and by heat stress in leaves. BnaJAZ1-C3, BnaJAZ6-A1 and BnaJAZ7-C3 were induced by cold and SA at 3 h post treatments and were upregulated by MeJA at all three times. Additionally, BnaJAZ7-C3 was induced by ABA. Although the fold-changes in their expression detected by RNA-Seq did not exactly match those detected by qRT-PCR, the detected expression patterns were mostly consistent for all the selected genes, confirming the reliability of the RNA-Seq results. In summary, all of the results identify these genes as candidates for further study on the potential roles of BnaTIFY in multiple stress responses of B. napus.

Fig. 7
figure 7

qRT-PCR analysis of expression patterns of BnaTIFY genes under different abiotic stresses and hormone treatments. Compare of qRT-PCR data (blue bar) and RNA-Seq data (red line). The relative qRT-PCR expression level is shown on the left y-axis. BnaActin was used as an endogenous reference gene. The relative transcript level was determined and normalized using the reference level and averaged over the three technical replicates. The FPKM or TPM from the RNA-Seq data is indicated on the right y-axis

Full size image

Cis-element analysis of TIFY promotors

The putative root-specific cis-elements (4), phytohormone-responsive cis-elements (6), environmental stress-responsive cis-elements (8) and transcriptional factor binding sites (4) in the 2000 bp region upstream sequences of each of TIFY gene were analyzed using PLACE (https://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/?action=newplace) and PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) (Additional file 14). As shown in Additional file 14, the number of root-specific cis-elements in the TIFY genes from B. rapa, B. oleracea, An- and Cn-subgenomes of B. napus did not differ significantly, although the levels of expression of BoJAZ and BnaJAZ genes were higher than those of BrJAZ genes in the root (Fig. 3). The lack of correlation between patterns of expression and conserved promoter/gene structures of those TIFY orthologous gene pairs indicated the presence of heritable epigenetic modulations during allopolyploidization in B. napus. The CGTCA/TGACG-motif (cis-acting regulatory element involved in MeJA-responsiveness) and ABRE (cis-acting element involved in ABA responsiveness) are the largest number of phytohormone-responsive cis-elements, and the light-responsive and ARE (cis-acting regulatory element essential for the anaerobic induction) are the largest number of environmental stress-responsive cis-elements in the TIFY promotors. MYCCONSENSUSAT (the MYC binding site) contains the largest number of transcriptional factor binding sites in TIFY promotors.

Discussion

TIFY proteins have proven to be important regulators in abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Since the Arabidopsis JAZ subfamily was identified as the vital repressor in JA signaling, increasing numbers of other JAZ proteins have been characterized as important stress-response regulators in various plant species, including B. rapa, B. oleracea, rice, cotton, tomato, poplar, grape, soybean, wheat, maize, rubber tree, Moso bamboo and purple false brome [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51, 55,56,57]. However, no B. napus TIFY was isolated and identified over the whole genome.

Previous studies indicated that a total of 36 and 36 TIFY proteins were identified in B. rapa accession Chiifu-401-42 [51] and B. oleracea var. capitate lines (02–12 and D134) [41]. In this study, we identified 77, 36 and 39 TIFY family genes in the genomes of B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea kale-like type TO1000DH, respectively (Additional file 1). In our study, three new TIFY genes were identified in B. oleracea, owing to the different versions of reference genomes. The results of a compared analysis between 36 BoTIFY genes in 02–12/D134 and 39 BoTIFY genes in TO1000 showed that the three new genes identified were Bo1g119100 (BoJAZ3/4–2), Bo7g082470 (BoTIFY8–3) and Bo9g152530 (BoTIFY8–5) in TO1000. Further analysis showed that the study by Liu [51] had failed to identify BoJAZ gene Bol030895 (C01:31,896,448..31,899,117) in 02–12 (the homologous gene locus in TO1000 was Bo1g119100). Four members from the JAZ subfamily from B. napus contained only the Jas domain, and one member contained only the NT domain (Additional file 1). We hypothesized that all of them were new genes that had recently mutated from typical TIFY members. For example, BnaA07g21950D (only contained in the NT domain) was located 81 bp upstream of BnaA07g21960D (a TIFY-Jas type BnaJAZ); the two members may have diverged from a NT-TIFY-Jas type BnaJAZ. To prove this hypothesis, we analyzed the genome sequences of BnaA07g21950D-BnaA07g21960D and the homologous chromosomal regions in B. rapa. As shown in Fig. 8a, the stop codon of BnaA07g21950D and start codon of BnaA07g21960D were located in the region homologous to the first intron of Bra003778. Therefore, we hypothesized that there may have been a longer transcript similar to Bra003778 in B. napus. We designed two pairs of primers (BnaA07g21950D-S/A and BnaA07g21960D-S/A) for PCR using the cDNA of ZS11 (B. napus L. cv. Zhongshuang 11) leaves. As expected, the prospective PCR products were obtained by the two pairs of primers. Interestingly, there was also a PCR product (275 bp) identified using BnaA07g21950D-S and BnaA07g21960D-A (Fig. 8b and Additional file 16). Thus, there are splice variants in this region in B. napus.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Sequence analysis of Bra003778, BnaA07g21950D and BnaA07g21960D (a) and PCR analysis (b). The blot of PCR production was cropped from the full gel image in Additional file 16 (b)

Full size image

In B. napus, the An- and Cn-subgenomes were collinear to the corresponding diploid Ar and Co genomes, respectively [35]. The majority of An-Ar and Cn-Co orthologous gene pairs have similar chromosomal locations. The chromosomal locations of most TIFY genes in the B. napus An- and Cn-subgenomes were similar to those of the orthologous TIFY genes in B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively (Additional file 3). For example, with the exception of Bra030986, which has no orthologous TIFY genes in the B. napus An-subgenome, the distribution of all 34 TIFY genes in B. rapa were similar to those of the orthologous TIFY genes in B. napus An-subgenome (Additional file 3) [41]. Similar to the B. rapa vs B. napus An-subgenome, the distribution of TIFY genes in B. oleracea was similar to those of the orthologous TIFY genes in the B. napus Cn-subgenome (Additional file 3) [51].

Unlike chromosomal locations and gene structures, the patterns of expression of the TIFY genes varied in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea. The JAZ subfamily genes were predominantly expressed in flower buds in B. rapa [41], while the majority of JAZ subfamily members were predominantly expressed in roots in B. napus (Fig. 3) and B. oleracea [51]. This difference indicated that the spatiotemporal patterns of expression of BnaJAZ genes were more similar to those of BoJAZ than to BrJAZ, regardless of whether the BnaJAZ members were from the B. napus An- or Cn-subgenomes. A common trait that is similar to the expression of TIFY genes in other species is that the JAZ subfamily genes in B. napus (Fig. 4), B. rapa [41] and B. oleracea [51] were highly induced by JA/MeJA. The BrJAZ genes were highly regulated by cold, salinity, drought and ABA, but not by SA [41]. Only a few of the BoJAZ genes were induced by treatment with SA and ethylene. Most of the JAZ genes in B. napus were upregulated by NaCl, PEG and SA but not by ABA and ethylene (Fig. 4). In contrast to BrJAZ, the BnaJAZ genes were strongly induced by freezing, while they were not induced by chilling (Fig. 5). The results indicated that there was differentiation in the pattern of expression of JAZ family genes in Brassicaceae species.

In this study, we found that the TIFY, PPD and ZIM/ZML subfamilies were low-expression genes and were not induced by treatment with phytohormones in B. napus (Figs. 3, 4 and 5). However, the BnaJAZ genes were predominantly expressed in B. napus roots and responded to multiple abiotic/biotic stresses and treatment with phytohormones. Two pairs of genes (BnaJAZ7-A3/BnaJAZ7-C3 and BnaJAZ1-A2/BnaJAZ1-C2) and four pairs of genes (BnaJAZ5-A1/BnaJAZ5-C1, BnaJAZ1-A1/BnaJAZ1-C1, BnaJAZ8-A1/BnaJAZ8-C1, and BnaJAZ10-A2/BnaJAZ10-C2) were induced to extremely high levels by the freezing treatment (> 100-fold to > 300-fold compared with the control) and infection with S. sclerotiorum (by > 500-fold to > 5000-fold compared with the control), respectively. They are valuable candidate genes for the genetic improvement of tolerance of plants to freezing stress and S. sclerotiorum infection in B. napus. Notably, the freezing-induced BnaJAZ7-A3/BnaJAZ7-C3 genes were the only Jas domain-type members. Although the Jas domain has been identified as the essential degron in degradation of JAZ proteins [6, 12, 17, 18, 23], no functional characterizations of only Jas domain proteins has been reported in other plant species. Thus, there may be new and important functions of the only Jas domain proteins in JA-mediated freezing tolerance in B. napus. Thus, the BnaJAZ genes induced by freezing and infection with S. sclerotiorum can be edited using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system to generate B. napus lines that are strongly adaptable to environmental stress.

Conclusions

In this study, a total of 77, 36 and 39 TIFY family genes with 11 groups were identified in the genomes of B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. Molecular evolutionary analysis showed that the TIFY gene structures were conserved in Brassicaceae species. Gene expression profiling and qRT-PCR revealed that different groups of BnaTIFY members have distinct spatiotemporal patterns of expression in normal conditions or when subjected to low temperature, heat, salt, PEG, ABA, MeJA, ethylene, SA treatments and infection with S. sclerotiorum. The JAZ subfamily members were predominantly expressed in B. napus roots and induced by NaCl, PEG, MeJA, SA, freezing treatments and infection by S. sclerotiorum, suggesting that they have vital roles in hormone signaling to regulate the tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in B. napus. The extensive annotation and expression analysis of the BnaTIFY genes contributes to our understanding of the functions of these genes in multiple stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk.

Methods

Plant materials and treatments

ZS11 (B. napus L. cv. Zhongshuang 11), early-maturing semi-winter rapeseed varieties (HX17 and HX58) were provided by Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

ZS11 seeds were allowed to germinate, and then the seedlings were transplanted to pots containing soil or vermiculite. The growth conditions, hormone treatments, and abiotic stress conditions were as described previously [58].

For chilling and freezing treatments with or without cold acclimation, the seedlings of HX17 and HX58 were used. They were treated as described previously [52].

Identification of TIFY in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea

Eighteen AtTIFY proteins were used as query sequences for the search of B. rape, B. oleracea and B. napus TIFY proteins by BLASTP (E-value <1e-5) in Ensembl genomes (http://ensemblgenomes.org/). The conserved domains were characterized using InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). The molecular weight, isoelectric point, and subcellular localization of TIFY proteins were predicted in Ensembl genomes and ProtComp 9.0 (http://linux1.softberry.com/). TBtools v0.6696 [59] was employed to analyze the gene structures of TIFY genes. The conserved motifs were analyzed with MEME (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/cgi-bin/meme.cgi). The upstream 2000 bp DNA sequences of TIFY were analyzed using PLACE (https://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/?action=newplace) and PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/).

Phylogenetic analysis of the TIFY proteins

Multiple sequence alignment of 170 TIFY proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, B. rapa, and B. oleracea were performed using ClustalW and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenetic method in MEGA X [60] with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rate ratio (Ka/Ks)

The nonsynonymous substitution rate (Ka) and the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) between paralogous gene pairs were calculated using DnaSP (DNA Sequence Polymorphism) v684 [61].

Chromosomal localization of TIFY genes

The position of TIFY genes on the chromosomes of B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. napus were obtained using TBtools v0.6696 [59].

RNA isolation and sequencing and gene expression analysis

The collected samples were sent to the sequencing cooperations of Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Novogene Co., Ltd. for RNA isolation, examination, and sequencing [52, 58]. qRT-PCR analysis was performed as described previously [58]. The primers used in this study were listed in Additional file 15.

Heat map analysis

Heatmaps of the expression profile values (RPKM: Reads Per kb Per Million reads; TPM: Transcripts Per Million) of the BnaTIFY genes were generated by TBtools v0.6696 [59].

Availability of data and materials

Additional data can be found in supplementary files. The RPKM value of BnaTIFY in leaves treated with chilling/freezing with or without cold acclimation were referenced from GEO (GSE129220). The RPKM of BnaTIFYs genes in B. napus leaves infected with S. sclerotiorum referenced from GEO: GSE81545).

Abbreviations

JAZ:

JASMONATE ZIM-domain

MeJA:

Methyl jasmonate

SA:

Salicylic acid

ABA:

Abscisic acid

ET:

Ethylene

PEG 6000:

Polyethylene glycol 6000

ZIM/ZML:

Zinc-finger Inflorescence Meristem: ZIM and ZIM-like

PPD:

PEAPOD

RPKM:

Reads Per kb Per Million reads

TPM:

Transcripts Per Million

NT:

N-terminal domain

Jas:

JA-associated domain

References

  1. 1.

    Kazan K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(4):219–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16:86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, Kumar V, Verma R, Upadhyay RG, Pandey M, et al. Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:161.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wasternack C, Hause B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann Bot. 2013;111(6):1021–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(4):436–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kazan K, Manners JM. JAZ repressors and the orchestration of phytohormone crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(1):22–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vanholme B, Grunewald W, Bateman A, Kohchi T, Gheysen G. The tify family previously known as ZIM. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(6):239–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bai YH, Meng YJ, Huang DL, Qi YH, Chen M. Origin and evolutionary analysis of the plant-specific TIFY transcription factor family. Genomics. 2011;98(2):128–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Staswick PE. JAZing up jasmonate signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13(2):66–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chung HS, Niu YJ, Browse J, Howe GA. Top hits in contemporary JAZ: an update on jasmonate signaling. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(13–14):1547–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chico JM, Chini A, Fonseca S, Solano R. JAZ repressors set the rhythm in jasmonate signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008;11(5):486–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chung HS, Howe GA. A critical role for the TIFY motif in repression of jasmonate signaling by a stabilized splice variant of the JASMONATE ZIM-domain protein JAZ10 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(1):131–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shikata M, Matsuda Y, Ando K, Nishii A, Takemura M, Yokota A, Kohchi T. Characterization of Arabidopsis ZIM, a member of a novel plant-specific GATA factor gene family. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(397):631–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Shaikhali J, de Dios B-LJ, Otvos K, Kremnev D, Garcia AS, Srivastava V, Wingsle G, Bako L, Strand A. The CRYPTOCHROME1-dependent response to excess light is mediated through the transcriptional activators ZINC FINGER PROTEIN EXPRESSED IN INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM LIKE1 and ZML2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(7):3009–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    White DW. PEAPOD regulates lamina size and curvature in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(35):13238–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baekelandt A, Pauwels L, Wang ZB, Li N, De Milde L, Natran A, Vermeersch M, Li YH, Goossens A, Inze D, et al. Arabidopsis leaf flatness is regulated by PPD2 and NINJA through repression of CYCLIN D3 genes. Plant Physiol. 2018;178(1):217–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thines B, Katsir L, Melotto M, Niu Y, Mandaokar A, Liu GH, Nomura K, He SY, Howe GA, Browse J. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448(7154):661–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chini A, Fonseca S, Fernandez G, Adie B, Chico JM, Lorenzo O, Garcia-Casado G, Lopez-Vidriero I, Lozano FM, Ponce MR, et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature. 2007;448(7154):666–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guo Q, Yoshida Y, Major IT, Wang K, Sugimoto K, Kapali G, Havko NE, Benning C, Howe GA. JAZ repressors of metabolic defense promote growth and reproductive fitness in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(45):E10768–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thatcher LF, Cevik V, Grant M, Zhai B, Jones JD, Manners JM, Kazan K. Characterization of a JAZ7 activation-tagged Arabidopsis mutant with increased susceptibility to the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(8):2367–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guo X, Stotz HU. Defense against sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Arabidopsis is dependent on jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene signaling. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007;20(11):1384–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    He X, Zhu L, Wassan GM, Wang Y, Miao Y, Shaban M, Hu H, Sun H, Zhang X. GhJAZ2 attenuates cotton resistance to biotic stresses via the inhibition of the transcriptional activity of GhbHLH171. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19(4):896–908.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Melotto M, Mecey C, Niu Y, Chung HS, Katsir L, Yao J, Zeng WQ, Thines B, Staswick P, Browse J, et al. A critical role of two positively charged amino acids in the Jas motif of Arabidopsis JAZ proteins in mediating coronatine- and jasmonoyl isoleucine-dependent interactions with the COI1F-box protein. Plant J. 2008;55(6):979–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Qi TC, Song SS, Ren QC, Wu DW, Huang H, Chen Y, Fan M, Peng W, Ren CM, Xie DX. The jasmonate-ZIM-domain proteins interact with the WD-repeat/bHLH/MYB complexes to regulate jasmonate-mediated anthocyanin accumulation and trichome initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2011;23(5):1795–814.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Qi TC, Huang H, Wu DW, Yan JB, Qi YJ, Song SS, Xie DX. Arabidopsis DELLA and JAZ proteins bind the WD-repeat/bHLH/MYB complex to modulate gibberellin and jasmonate signaling synergy. Plant Cell. 2014;26(3):1118–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hu H, He X, Tu L, Zhu L, Zhu S, Ge Z, Zhang X. GhJAZ2 negatively regulates cotton fiber initiation by interacting with the R2R3-MYB transcription factor GhMYB25-like. Plant J. 2016;88(6):921–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Song S, Qi T, Huang H, Ren Q, Wu D, Chang C, Peng W, Liu Y, Peng J, Xie D. The Jasmonate-ZIM domain proteins interact with the R2R3-MYB transcription factors MYB21 and MYB24 to affect Jasmonate-regulated stamen development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):1000–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Boter M, Golz JF, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Fernandez-Barbero G, Franco-Zorrilla JM, Solano R. FILAMENTOUS FLOWER is a direct target of JAZ3 and modulates responses to jasmonate. Plant Cell. 2015;27(11):3160–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang DL, Yao J, Mei CS, Tong XH, Zeng LJ, Li Q, Xiao LT, Sun TP, Li J, Deng XW, et al. Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(19):E1192–200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Plett JM, Daguerre Y, Wittulsky S, Vayssieres A, Deveau A, Melton SJ, Kohler A, Morrell-Falvey JL, Brun A, Veneault-Fourrey C, et al. Effector MiSSP7 of the mutualistic fungus Laccaria bicolor stabilizes the Populus JAZ6 protein and represses jasmonic acid (JA) responsive genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(22):8299–304.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gimenez-Ibanez S, Boter M, Fernandez-Barbero G, Chini A, Rathjen JP, Solano R. The bacterial effector HopX1 targets JAZ transcriptional repressors to activate jasmonate signaling and promote infection in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(2):e1001792.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Song SS, Qi TC, Fan M, Zhang X, Gao H, Huang H, Wu DW, Guo HW, Xie DX. The bHLH subgroup IIId factors negatively regulate jasmonate-mediated plant defense and development. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(7):e1003653.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Seo JS, Joo J, Kim MJ, Kim YK, Nahm BH, Song SI, Cheong JJ, Lee JS, Kim JK, Choi YD. OsbHLH148, a basic helix-loop-helix protein, interacts with OsJAZ proteins in a jasmonate signaling pathway leading to drought tolerance in rice. Plant J. 2011;65(6):907–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hu YR, Jiang LQ, Wang F, Yu DQ. Jasmonate regulates the INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION-C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR/DRE BINDING FACTOR1 cascade and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(8):2907–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B, et al. Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chini A, Ben-Romdhane W, Hassairi A, Aboul-Soud MAM. Identification of TIFY/JAZ family genes in Solanum lycopersicum and their regulation in response to abiotic stresses. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177381.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ebel C, BenFeki A, Hanin M, Solano R, Chini A. Characterization of wheat (Triticum aestivum) TIFY family and role of Triticum Durum TdTIFY11a in salt stress tolerance. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200566.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    He DH, Lei ZP, Tang BS, Xing HY, Zhao JX, Jing YL. Identification and analysis of the TIFY gene family in Gossypium raimondii. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(3):10119–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Huang Z, Jin SH, Guo HD, Zhong XJ, He J, Li X, Jiang MY, Yu XF, Long H, Ma MD, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of TIFY family genes in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) and expression profiling analysis under dehydration and cold stresses. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2620.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Li W, Xia XC, Han LH, Ni P, Yan JQ, Tao M, Huang GQ, Li XB. Genome-wide identification and characterization of JAZ gene family in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2788.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Saha G, Park JI, Kayum MA, Nou IS. A genome-wide analysis reveals stress and hormone responsive patterns of TIFY family genes in Brassica rapa. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:936.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sun H, Chen L, Li J, Hu M, Ullah A, He X, Yang X, Zhang X. The jasmonate ZIM-domain gene family mediates JA signaling and stress response in cotton. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58(12):2139–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wang Y, Pan F, Chen D, Chu W, Liu H, Xiang Y. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the Populus trichocarpa TIFY gene family. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;115:360–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Xia W, Yu H, Cao P, Luo J, Wang N. Identification of TIFY family genes and analysis of their expression profiles in response to phytohormone treatments and Melampsora larici-populina infection in poplar. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:493.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ye H, Du H, Tang N, Li X, Xiong L. Identification and expression profiling analysis of TIFY family genes involved in stress and phytohormone responses in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;71(3):291–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang L, You J, Chan Z. Identification and characterization of TIFY family genes in Brachypodium distachyon. J Plant Res. 2015;128(6):995–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhang Y, Gao M, Singer SD, Fei Z, Wang H, Wang X. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the TIFY gene family in grape. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44465.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang Z, Li X, Yu R, Han M, Wu Z. Isolation, structural analysis, and expression characteristics of the maize TIFY gene family. Mol Gen Genomics. 2015;290(5):1849–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhao G, Song Y, Wang C, Butt HI, Wang Q, Zhang C, Yang Z, Liu Z, Chen E, Zhang X, et al. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the TIFY gene family in response to drought in cotton. Mol Gen Genomics. 2016;291(6):2173–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhu D, Bai X, Luo X, Chen Q, Cai H, Ji W, Zhu Y. Identification of wild soybean (Glycine soja) TIFY family genes and their expression profiling analysis under bicarbonate stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2013;32(2):263–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Liu X, Zhao C, Yang L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Fang Z, Lv H. Genome-wide identification, expression profile of the TIFY gene family in Brassica oleracea var. capitata, and their divergent response to various pathogen infections and phytohormone treatments. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(2):127.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xin H, Xianchao N, Pan X, Wei L, Min Y, Yu K, Lunwen Q, Wei H. Comparative transcriptome analyses revealed conserved and novel responses to cold and freezing stress in Brassica napus L. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(8):2723–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bolton MD, Thomma BP, Nelson BD. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (lib.) de Bary: biology and molecular traits of a cosmopolitan pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;7(1):1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Girard IJ, Tong C, Becker MG, Mao X, Huang J, de Kievit T, Fernando WGD, Liu S, Belmonte MF. RNA sequencing of Brassica napus reveals cellular redox control of Sclerotinia infection. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(18):5079–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sun Q, Wang G, Zhang X, Zhang X, Qiao P, Long L, Yuan Y, Cai Y. Genome-wide identification of the TIFY gene family in three cultivated Gossypium species and the expression of JAZ genes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42418.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Liu F, Sun T, Wang L, Su W, Gao S, Su Y, Xu L, Que Y. Plant jasmonate ZIM domain genes: shedding light on structure and expression patterns of JAZ gene family in sugarcane. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):771.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hong H, Xiao H, Yuan H, Zhai J, Huang X. Cloning and characterisation of JAZ gene family in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Biol. 2015;17(3):618–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chen C, Xia R, Chen H, Thomas H, Frank M, He Y, Xia R. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sanchez-Gracia A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(12):3299–302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    He X, Xie S, Xie P, Yao M, Liu W, Qin L, Liu Z, Zheng M, Liu H, Guan M, et al. Genome-wide identification of stress-associated proteins (SAP) with A20/AN1 zinc finger domains associated with abiotic stresses responses in Brassica napus. Environ Exp Bot. 2019;165:108–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Institutions of Higher Learning Innovation Ability Enhancement (30552–520190100004), the High-Tech Research and Development Program 863 (grant no. 2016YFD0101300) and Oilseed rape industry system in Hunan province (2019).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Xin He, Yu Kang, Wenqian Li, Wei Liu, Pan Xie, Li Liao, Luyao Huang, Min Yao, Lunwen Qian & Wei Hua

  2. Oil Crops Research, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Xin He, Zhongsong Liu, Chunyun Guan & Mei Guan

  3. Hunan Branch of National Oilseed Crops Improvement Center, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Xin He, Zhongsong Liu, Chunyun Guan & Mei Guan

  4. Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, 430062, China

    Wei Hua

Authors
  1. Xin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenqian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Luyao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Min Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lunwen Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhongsong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chunyun Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mei Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Wei Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XH designed the overall study, performed and analyzed most of the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. YK, WL, WL, PX, LL, LH, MY, LQ assisted with experimental data analysis and graph draw. CG and ZL made a significant contribution to the manuscript. WH and MG revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mei Guan or Wei Hua.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1

Characteristics of TIFY in B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea.

Additional file 2

Syntenic analysis of B. napus, B. rapa and B. oleracea genomes. (A) Genome-wide syntenic relationships among A and C subgenomes in B. napus relative to the B. rapa (A genome: A01-A10) and B. olereace (C genome: C1-C9). Genic synteny blocks are connected by gray lines. (B) Syntenic dotplot between Brassica napus, Brassica rapa, Brassica olereace using whole-genome alignments by CoGe SynMap (https://genomevolution.org/coge/SynMap.pl).

Additional file 3

Distribution of TIFY genes on the B. napus, B. rape and B. oleracea chromosomes. A01–10: B. rape chromosomes (A); C01–09: B. oleracea chromosomes (C); chrA01–10: B. napus An-subgenome chromosomes; chrC01–09: B. napus Cn-subgenome chromosomes (B); Random means genes were randomly distributed to a specific chromosome. chrAnn and chrCnn were unanchored scaffolds that could not be mapped to a specific chromosome from the A- and C-subgenomes, respectively.

Additional file 4.

10 motifs were detected in BnaTIFY proteins using MEME.

Additional file 5

Gene structures of Bo1g108240, BnaC01g32210D-BnaC01g32200D, Bra023900-Bra023899, BnaA01g25320D-BnaA01g25310D.

Additional file 6

Sequence analysis of Bo1g108240, BnaC01g32210D, BnaC01g32200D.

Additional file 7.

Sequence analysis of TIFY domain in BnaTIFY proteins.

Additional file 8.

Sequence analysis of Jas and CCT domain in BnaTIFY proteins.

Additional file 9

Estimated Ka/Ks ratios of TIFY genes in Arabidopsis, B. napus, B. rapa, and B. oleracea.

Additional file 10

RNA-seq data of expression levels of BnaTIFY family genes across different tissues and organs.

Additional file 11

RNA-seq data of expression levels (TPM: transcriptions per millon) of BnaTIFY family genes under different stresses and phytohormones.

Additional file 12

RNA-seq data of expression levels of BnaTIFY family genes under cold and freezing treatments.

Additional file 13

RNA-seq data of expression levels of BnaTIFY in B. napus infected with S. sclerotiorum.

Additional file 14

Cis-elements present in the promoters of BnaTIFY genes in B. napus.

Additional file 15.

List of primers used in this study.

Additional file 16

The full gel image of the productions of BnaA07g21950D-BnaA07g21960D.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Kang, Y., Li, W. et al. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the TIFY gene family in the response to multiple stresses in Brassica napus L.. BMC Genomics 21, 736 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07128-2

Keywords

  • Brassica napus
  • TIFY
  • Abiotic stresses
  • Freezing
  • Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
  • Hormone
  • MeJA

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us