Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genome-wide study of pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) bHLH transcription factors indicates that cryptochrome-interacting bHLH2 (AcCIB2) participates in flowering time regulation and abiotic stress response

BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 735 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Transcription factors (TFs) are essential regulators of growth and development in eukaryotes. Basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLHs) is one of the most significant TFs families involved in several critical regulatory functions. Cryptochrome-interacting bHLH (CIB) and cryptochromes form an extensive regulatory network to mediate a plethora of pathways. Although bHLHs regulate critical biological processes in plants, the information about pineapple bHLHs remains unexplored.

Results

Here, we identified a total of 121 bHLH proteins in the pineapple genome. The identified genes were renamed based on the ascending order of their gene ID and classified into 18 subgroups by phylogenetic analysis. We found that bHLH genes are expressed in different organs and stages of pineapple development. Furthermore, by the ectopic expression of AcCIB2 in Arabidopsis and complementation of Atcib2 mutant, we verified the involvement of AcCIB2 in photomorphogenesis and abiotic stress response.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that AcCIB2 plays an essential role in flowering time regulation and abiotic stress response. The present study provides additional insights into the current knowledge of bHLH genes and suggests their potential role in various biological processes during pineapple development.

Background

Transcription factors (TFs) are vital proteins that participate in crucial physiological functions in different tissues during different stages of development and physiological responses. TFs could repress or activate the expression of their target genes, resulting in the regulation of the development and physiological response. TFs could repress or activate the target gene expression resulting in the regulation of  development and response [1, 2]. Basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) are among the most significant and functionally important class of TF family, which is widely distributed among eukaryotes [3, 4]. bHLH proteins are characterized by a bHLH domain of approximately 60 amino acid sequences with two conserved regions, the basic region and a helix-loop-helix (HLH) region [5]. The basic domain comprises 10 to 15 amino acids, while HLH contains approximately 40 amino acids. The basic region is found at the N-terminus of the domain and modulates DNA binding, whereas the HLH region of the domain facilitates dimerization through protein-protein interaction [6]. Generally, bHLH TFs regulate their target after forming homo or heterodimers by interacting with bHLHs and other regulatory proteins [7, 8]. In plants, bHLHs play crucial roles in gene expression during regulatory and developmental processes, including transcriptional regulation, chromosome segregation, general transcriptional enhancement, hormonal signaling, wounding, response to environmental cues, metabolism regulation, flower and fruit development [3, 9,10,11,12].

In angiosperms, a successful transition from the vegetative phase to the reproductive stage, followed by fertilization, is essential for seed formation. Plant starts to flower in response to a plethora of environmental signals, including photoperiod, which ensures their reproductive success [13]. Plants encode numerous photo-receptors that participate in light signaling and regulate many aspects of growth and development [14]. Several photoreceptors have been reported in plants, including cryptochromes, phytochromes, phototropins, UV Resistance locus 8 (UVR8), and Zeitlupe family members (ZTL, FKF1, and LKP2) [15,16,17]. CRYs are photolyase-associated blue-light receptors, and they interact with different proteins in the presence of blue-light to mediate a plethora of functions, such as inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and flowering initiation [9, 18,19,20]. In Arabidopsis, three cryptochromes are encoded: cryptochrome 1 (CRY1), cryptochrome 2 (CRY2), and cryptochrome 3 (CRY3) [14, 17, 21, 22]. CRY1 participates in blue light-dependent de-etiolation responses and inhibition of hypocotyl elongation. It also acts redundantly with CRY2 and is partly involved in floral initiation [9, 14]. However, the primary function of CRY2 is the regulation of flowering in response to blue light [18, 23, 24]. CRY3 is found in chloroplasts and mitochondrion and reported to repair UV-induced single-stranded DNA damage [14].

In response to blue-light, cryptochromes interact with different proteins to regulate photomorphogenesis. Several proteins are known to interact with cryptochrome, including CRY2-interacting bHLH proteins (CIBs) [16]. CIBs belong to BEE/CIB subfamily of bHLH and interact with cryptochrome to regulate floral initiation by activating FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) [9]. CIBs act redundantly in the CRY-CIB pathway to promote flower induction [9]. CIB1 was the first among CIBs to be identified in plants that positively regulates floral initiation [25]. Similarly, CIB2 and other CIBs also regulate flowering individually or after dimerization [9].

Comprehensive characterization and functional analysis of bHLH TFs have been performed in several important crop plants, including Chinese cabbage and Brassica [5, 7, 11]. However, no study of this essential TF family is reported in pineapple, an economically crucial perennial fruit crop belonging to Bromeliaceae. Similar to other plants, pineapple also encodes several bHLHs, including CIBs. Here, by performing a genome-wide study, we identified 121 bHLH proteins and characterized them comprehensively. Further, we also described AcCIB2 (AcbHLH8) functions by ectopically expressing it and complementing the Arabidopsis cib2 mutant. Here we show that AcCIB2 is involved in flowering time regulation and also participates in abiotic stress response.

Results

Identification and characterization of pineapple bHLH genes

We identified 121 AcbHLH proteins in pineapple and named them based on the ascending order of their gene ID. The bHLH genes of pineapple showed high similarity to those in Arabidopsis. We further characterized the pineapple bHLH proteins based on their molecular weight, isoelectric point, amino acid, and open reading frame (ORF) length, respectively (Additional Table S1). The molecular weight of AcbHLH proteins ranged from 1.04 kDa to 345.97 kDa. AcbHLH17 (Aco001282) have a higher molecular weight of 345.97 kDa, followed by AcbHLH99 (Aco016776) with 92.57 kDa. AcbHLH15 (Aco001136) has the lowest molecular weight of 1.04 kDa among the pineapple bHLH proteins. The pineapple bHLH proteins also have different isoelectric point values, ranging from AcbHLH30 (Aco002151) with the highest of 10.76, and AcbHLH53 recording the smallest value of 4.73. Consistently, the pineapple bHLHs have different ORF size, where AcbHLH17 has the most extended ORF sequence, while AcbHLH91 (Aco004138) has the shortest ORF (Additional Table S1).

The exon-intron analysis suggests that most of the AcbHLH possess introns, and with forty-nine introns, AcbHLH17 had the maximum number of introns. However, AcbHLH18, AcbHLH45, AcbHLH64, AcbHLH70, AcbHLH76 and AcbHLH83 were intronless. Besides, twenty-eight AcbHLH genes did not have the UTRs, and seven AcbHLH genes only had 5′ UTR, and sixteen AcbHLH genes had 3′ UTR only (Additional Figure S2).

Phylogenetic analysis, chromosome location, and motif analysis

The phylogenetic tree divided pineapple bHLH proteins into eighteen groups (from I to XVIII) with their corresponding Arabidopsis homologs (Fig. 1). Interestingly, all the AcCIBs were in the group XII with Arabidopsis CIBs (Fig. 1). The pineapple CIB genes grouped with their corresponding Arabidopsis homolog suggest that they may have a similar biological function in photomorphogenesis and developmental responses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship between bHLH genes of pineapple and Arabidopsis. Different colors indicate different groups. Prefix ‘Ac’ indicates Ananas comosus and ‘AT’ refers to Arabidopsis thaliana. Red circles represent the pineapple CIB genes and the green represents Arabidopsis CIB genes

Full size image

We then studied the distribution of AcbHLHs on pineapple chromosomes and found that pineapple bHLH genes are distributed unevenly on 23 linkage groups (LG). Only two pineapple linkage groups, LG 22 and LG 24, do not possess bHLH genes. Few linkage groups have a higher density of bHLH genes (up to 11 genes), whereas few have only one, and all the AcbHLHs are distributed on different LGs (Fig. 2). These findings indicate that there is no direct correlation between bHLH gene distribution and linkage groups length.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chromosomal locations of pineapple bHLH genes. The bHLH genes of pineapple were mapped to different chromosomes using MapChart. Each AcbHLH is noted on the right side of its respective chromosome. Gene IDs in red represent pineapple CIB genes. The scale is in megabases (Mb)

Full size image

To further characterize the AcbHLH proteins, we retrieved the amino acid sequences from the bHLH domain region and aligned them (Additional Figure S3). The pineapple bHLH domain analysis indicates that the average length of the AcbHLH domain was approximately 50 aa, which ranged from 34 to 56 aa (Fig. 3, Additional Table S4). Further, the study of conserved motif distribution of AcbHLH superfamily using the MEME program resulted in the identification of ten different motifs distributed among AcbHLH proteins (Additional Figure S5). The numbers of these motifs in bHLHs proteins were different, which could be responsible for the functional diversity of AcbHLH proteins. The number of motifs on each AcbHLH ranged from 1 to 9. For example, AcbHLH34, AcbHLH46, AcbHLH47 and AcbHLH90 had only one motif whereas, AcbHLH108 and AcbHLH60 had a maximum of 8 and 9 motifs, respectively (Additional Figure S5). Moreover, the Pfam domain search indicated that some on the AcbHLH protein possessed other domains in addition to the bHLH domain. For example, eight AcbHLHs (AcbHLH9, AcbHLH20, AcbHLH23, AcbHLH60, AcbHLH70, AcbHLH99, AcbHLH109, and AcbHLH120) have extra bHLH-MYC_N domain downstream in addition to bHLH domain. The structural information further suggests that pineapple AcbHLHs genes have a close similarity with other reported bHLH proteins, and may also be performing a similar physiological function.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sequence characteristics of the bHLH domains. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted with the bHLH domains of all pineapple bHLH candidate and results were visualized using Weblogo online software

Full size image

Expression profile of pineapple bHLH genes in pineapple

We performed the expression profile analysis of pineapple bHLH genes using RNA-seq from various developmental stages of different organs to understand their possible functions in pineapple. The altered expression patterns of the majority of AcbHLH in the selected samples suggest that the pineapple bHLH genes play different roles in a specific organ or developmental stage. The expression profile of AcbHLH genes mainly clustered into three different groups according to their expression pattern. Low expressed bHLH genes were gathered together in group I, highly expressed genes formed group II and the moderately expressed genes formed group III (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression profiles of the pineapple bHLH genes. Hierarchical clustering of expression profiles of bHLHs in different organs and developmental stages. Red color represents a high level of transcript abundance, and blue color represents low transcript abundance. The right side of the figure shows the scale. Different groups i.e. group I, group II and group III represent low expressed, highly expressed, and moderately expressed bHLH genes, respectively. Gene IDs in red represent pineapple CIB genes. Details of the samples are mentioned at the bottom of each lane: sepal Se1–Se4, gynoecium Gy1- Gy7, ovule Ov1–Ov7, petal Pe1–Pe3, stamen St1–St6, fruit ‘Fr_S1–Fr_S7’, root ‘Ro’, leaf ‘Le’, and flower ‘Fl’ where ‘S’ is the abbreviation for ‘stage

Full size image

Overall, the majority of bHLH showed stage-specific and organ-specific expression, suggesting the specificity of bHLH proteins during pineapple development. Hierarchical clustering into three distinct groups indicates a correlation between biological function and the expression pattern at a particular stage and organ development. Depending on the developmental requirements, the expression of the AcbHLHs was a stage and/or organ-specific. For example, AcbHLH113, a homolog of ABORTED MICROSPORES (AMS), had relatively high expression levels in the different stages of stamen development, indicating that it might be playing a crucial role in pineapple anther development (Fig. 4). Most of the pineapple CIB genes except AcCIB1 (AcbHLH71) were in group II, displaying a high expression level in the stages of flower and fruit development, suggesting that the pineapple AcCIB1 may not be the primary regulator of flowering. The remaining CIBs, i.e. CIB2 (AcbHLH8), CIB3 (AcbHLH107), CIB4 (AcbHLH92) and CIB5 (AcbHLH12) are in group II with highly expressed bHLH genes. Interestingly, AcCIB2 showed a high expression in all the stages of ovule, stamen development and had a relatively higher expression in flower, suggesting that AcCIB2 may be playing a crucial role in flower development (Fig. 4). These results indicate that AcbHLHs genes are expressed at different stages of pineapple development and are essential for growth and development.

AcCIB2 is a nuclear protein involved in photomorphogenesis

To investigate the possible role of AcCIB2, we generated transgenic plants of Arabidopsis that were ectopically expressing AcCIB2. The observation of 7-day old roots of transgenic plants under a confocal microscope showed that AcCIB2-GFP is a nuclear protein, and it localizes in the nucleus (Fig. 5), which is in agreement with the previous findings [23]. Generally, Col-0 plants start flowering in 23 to 26 days after transferring to the soil in a walk-in growth chamber, but the Arabidopsis cib2 mutant begun to produce the flower in 14 to 16 days (Fig. 6a). We found that the AcCIB2-GFP could complement the early flowering phenotype of Atcib2, and complemented plants produce flower between 23 to 25 days after transfer to soil. While the plants ectopically expressing AcCIB2 do not show any significant differences in the flowering time and produced flower between 22 to 24 days, similar to wild-type plants (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 5
figure 5

AcCIB2-GFP localizes to the nucleus. AcCIB2-GFP localization in the nucleus of seven-day-old roots of transgenic Arabidopsis plants. GFP fluorescence is represented in green and DAPI in blue channel, Scale bars = 20 μm

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

AcCIB2 regulates the photomorphogenesis. a Photograph showing the early phenotype of Arabidopsis cib2 mutant and complementation of early flowering phenotype of by AcCIB2-GFP. Plants were grown on the media plates for ten days, followed by transferring to soil in plastic pots and kept in a walk-in chamber. Plants were then photographed after 20 days of the transfer. b Relative expression of critical flowering genes (CO, FT and SOC1) and CRY-CIB genes (CRY1, CRY2, CIB1, CIB4 and CIB5) in Col-0, cib2 mutant, complemented (cib2 + 35S::AcCIB2-GFP) and in AcCIB2 overexpressing (35S::AcCIB2-GFP) lines. Gene expression is represented in fold change of expression against Arabidopsis ef1α calculated by 2−ΔΔCT. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE of three biological replicate assays. Asterisks denote the statistical significance between control and treatment as judged by the Student’s t-test (*** P < 0.001)

Full size image

To explore the reason behind the early flowering phenotype of cib2, we examined the expression of major flowering related genes (CO, FT, and SOC1) and CRY-CIB genes (CRY1, CRY2, CIB1, CIB4, and CIB5). We found that the expression level of SOC1 and FT was significantly higher in the cib2 mutant, whereas the expression of CO was reduced compared to Col-0 plants (Fig. 6b). The complemented plants of cib2 mutant by AcCIB2 did not show any significant change in the expression of selected genes compared to wild type, suggesting that AcCIB2 may have a conserved role in plants. However, the ectopic expression of the AcCIB2 changed the expression of CRY-CIB genes, and the expression of CRY1, CIB1 and CIB5 were significantly altered, suggesting that the CRY-CIB genes may be working redundantly in the pathways (Fig. 6b). Taken together, these results indicate that the AcCIB2 is involved in photomorphogenesis and may have a conserved function in plants.

Ectopic expression of AcCIB2 enhances abiotic stress resistance

To better understand the role of AcCIB2 in response to various abiotic stress, we checked the expression of AcCIB2 at different time points under osmotic (350 mM Mannitol) stress and salt (150 mM NaCl) stress in pineapple plants. The quantitative RT-PCR shows that both the osmotic and salt stress increased the expression of AcCIB2, suggesting its potential role during abiotic stress in pineapple (Fig. 7a). To further validate the involvement of AcCIB2 in abiotic stress response, we grew different AcCIB2 transgenic lines, including Atcib2 and wild-type Arabidopsis plants on a media supplemented with Mannitol 300 mM, 150 mM NaCl and 0.5 μM abscisic acid (ABA). In the germination assay, we found that the Atcib2 mutant displays susceptibility to salinity and osmotic stress compared to wild-type plants. However, the transgenic plants expressing AcCIB2 resulted in better performance in terms of germination and growth phenotype during salinity, osmotic stress and ABA treatment (Fig. 7b). Overall, these findings approve the role of cryptochromes in abiotic stress response.

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Relative expression of AcCIB2 in pineapple plants at different time points after osmotic (300 mM Mannitol), salt 150 (mM NaCl) and phytohormone ABA (0.5 μM) treatment. AcCIB2 expression is represented in fold change of expression against pineapple ef1α calculated by 2−ΔΔCT. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE of three biological replicate assays. Asterisks denote the statistical significance between control and treatment as judged by the Student’s t-test (*** P < 0.001). b Overexpression of AcCIB2 results in resistance to abiotic stress. The phenotype of 3 days old cib2 mutant, complemented (cib2 + 35S::AcCIB2-GFP) and in AcCIB2 overexpressing (35S::AcCIB2-GFP) lines germinated under osmotic stress (300 mM Mannitol), salinity stress (150 mM NaCl), and ABA 0.5 μM

Full size image

Discussion

Transcription factors regulate the expression of downstream target genes, resulting in control of diverse biological processes. A group of transcription factors contains a highly conserved amino acid motif known as basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain. These bHLH proteins perform a myriad of regulatory function in eukaryotic lineages and have been studied in several plants [6, 11]. The bHLH transcription factors have been previously studied in several plant species, including maize and potato [3, 4, 11, 26,27,28]. However, this group of crucial transcription factor family is still unexplored in pineapple. The availability of the sequenced genome of pineapple serves as a great genetic resource for studying the gene families [29]. Here, we identified 121 bHLH genes that form a large family in pineapple. Generally, angiosperms have more bHLH sequences in their genome and form a big family; for example, in Arabidopsis, approximately 170 bHLH proteins are found [3]. Similarly, pineapple also possesses a large number of bHLH proteins suggesting their dispensable role in the pineapple evolution and development.

Previous studies suggest that the two helices of the bHLH domain fulfill the DNA binding prerequisite by forming the homo or heterodimers between the bHLH proteins. In contrast, the basic region of most bHLH proteins interacts with the DNA sequences such as E-boxes and G-boxes [6]. Besides, approximately 77% of AcbHLH possessed the conserved glutamic acid (E) at the 9th position in their basic region of the domain (Additional Figure S3). This glutamic acid (E) directly binds to CA nucleotide of the hexanucleotide sequence of the E-box and/or G-box [6, 30]. Pineapple bHLH proteins also share similar conserved domains and amino acid sequences with the Arabidopsis proteins in the same cluster.

The exon and intron structure of genes is an important feature to study evolutionary and functional divergence within the same or closely related gene families [3]. We found different exon-intron structures in AcbHLH superfamily, some of the genes have no introns in their structure, and some are intron rich, in contrast, some have few numbers of introns (Additional Figure S2, Additional Table S1). Consistently, a phylogenetic tree reveals the functional relationship of proteins within a group and serves as an excellent tool to study evolution [27, 31]. Phylogenetic analysis classified AcbHLHs into 18 subgroups (Fig. 1), the pineapple bHLH also formed a group with their Arabidopsis homologs. AcCIB2 falls into group XII with pineapple CIBs, Arabidopsis CIBs, and phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs), suggesting that they might have a similar function and are closely related via a common ancestor. Members of group XII play a significant role in photomorphogenesis [27], indicating the functional and conserved evolutionary relationship of bHLH proteins between pineapple and Arabidopsis. Interestingly, bHLH transcription factors and cryptochromes are also encoded by E. coli, liverworts, and ferns, indicating their conserved nature [32, 33].

The gene expression patterns during different growth stages and conditions could also be an indicator of gene function [11].

One of the essential class of photo-receptors involved in flowering initiation is cryptochromes (CRYs) and their interacting proteins; cryptochrome-interacting bHLH proteins (CIBs) [18]. Most of the photoreceptors signaling mechanisms have been reported in Arabidopsis [15], and recently in tomato [17]. CRY2-CIB network in plants decodes an excellent pathway for modulating light signal during photomorphogenesis. In Arabidopsis, CRY2 interacts with CIB1, CIB2, CIB4, and CIB5 to mediate growth and development, especially flowering time regulation and response to environmental cues. The finding that AcCIB2 expresses in the majority of developmental stages and could be involved in flower development led us further to study the function of AcCIB2. Previous studies also suggest that CIBs interact with CRY2 and activate transcription of flowering related genes in response to blue light [9, 18, 25]. In agreement with these findings, we found that the null mutation of CIB2 results in an early flowering phenotype. To check whether pineapple CIB2 and Arabidopsis CIB2 have a similar function, we complemented the Atcib2 mutant with AcCIB2. Consistent with our hypothesis, AcCIB2 could complement Atcib2 (Fig. 6a), suggesting that AcCIB2 has a similar biological function with AtCIB2.

Generally, six different genetic pathways control the flowering, and they finally come together downstream at floral integrators FT and SOC1. The expression of FT and SOC1 induces the expression of floral identity genes resulting in flower formation [34]. Previous studies show that CIBs act redundantly to regulate flowering by promoting the transcription of some flowering genes, notably FT and SOCI [9, 18, 35]. We investigated the transcript level of FT, SOC1 and other CIBs in the Atcib2 and the transgenic Arabidopsis plants with pineapple CIB2. Consistently, the transcript level of FT and SOC1 genes changed significantly in the mutant. The quantitative RT-PCR data indicate that the mutation in CIB2 triggers the FT transcription resulting in early flowering (Fig. 6b). Besides, the transcript levels of CIBs (CIB1, CIB4 and CIB5) were also altered, indicating that CIBs act redundantly during photomorphogenesis in plants.

Increasing evidence indicates that cryptochromes are also involved in abiotic stress response through biosynthesis of ROS [36]. Several findings suggest that in addition to their established role in photomorphogenesis, cryptochromes also react to numerous abiotic stress responses [36, 37]. This indicates that CIBs might also be involved in abiotic stress response as they regulate cryptochromes. In agreement, the quantitative RT-PCR result showed a significant change of AcCIB2 transcript in pineapple plants under osmotic and salt stress, validating the idea that CIB2 plays a role in abiotic stress response (Fig. 7a). Further, transgenic Arabidopsis plants also showed resistance to salinity and osmotic stress (Fig. 7b). The role of CRYs in stomatal development, opening and closure during stress conditions has been well documented [38,39,40]. We also found that the transgenic plant performed better under ABA treatment, supporting the notion that CIB2 could be a regulator of abiotic stress response in plants through CRY-CIB pathway.

Taken together, the present study provides a platform to study the pineapple AcbHLH genes. Future studies with the specific AcbHLHs that are involved in the particular pathway will further clarify how AcbHLHs regulate the response to biotic and abiotic stresses in pineapple.

Conclusion

In this study, a comprehensive investigation of bHLH genes was performed, and 121 AcbHLH genes were identified in the pineapple genome. Pineapple bHLH genes were further classified into 18 subfamilies. The AcbHLHs expression profiles suggest their diverse expression at different developmental and in different organs. Besides, the functional characterization of AcbHLH8 (AcCIB2) shows the conserved functional role of bHLH genes in photomorphogenesis and response abiotic stress. Overall, this study provides important information about the potential functions of the AcbHLHs, especially the AcCIB2 role in flowering, which is an essential trait for crop breeding.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Pineapple growth and treatments

Two-month-old tissue culture raised MD2 variety, a hybrid pineapple (Ananas comosus) variety from Pineapple Research Institute Hawaii, was used for the experiments. The pineapple breeding group provided the starting material for tissue culture in Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. The plants were reared in pots containing soil supplements (peat moss: perlite = 2:1 v/v) kept in a chamber at 30 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod under the light intensity of 60–70 μmol m− 2 s− 1 and 70% humidity. For osmotic (300 mM Mannitol), salt (150 mM NaCl) and abscisic acid (0.5 μM ABA) stress treatments, pineapple plants were treated for 24, 48, and 72 h. The leaf tissues from the treated and control plants were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for RNA isolation.

Arabidopsis growth and treatments

Arabidopsis thaliana L. ecotype (Col-0) was used as wild-type and for transgenic plant generation, and the T-DNA line (SALK_121700) of Arabidopsis cib2 mutant was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Columbus, OH, USA). The seeds were surface sterilized and plated in circular 9 cm Petri dishes, as described previously [41]. The plated seeds were then kept for stratification in the dark at 4 °C for 48 h. After stratification, the plates were moved to a growth chamber and grown vertically at 22 °C in a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. All the experiments were performed from the plant of T3 generation using three independent lines of 35S::AcCIB2-GFP (AcCIB2 ectopic expression) and Atcib2 + 35S::AcCIB2-GFP (Atcib2 complementation) plants. For abiotic stress treatment, wild-type, Atcib2 mutant, Atcib2 complemented line and AcCIB2 ectopic expression lines were assayed for germination on Hoagland medium supplemented with or without salt (NaCl 150 mM), osmotic (Mannitol 300 mM), and phytohormone 0.5 μM abscisic acid (ABA). To observe the germination phenotype, photographs were taken after 3 d. All experiments were repeated at least three times.

Plasmid constructs and plant transformation

AcCIB2-GFP construct was generated by amplifying 1.3 kb CDS sequence, excluding the stop codon, from pineapple cDNA and cloned to pENTR D-TOPO vector, followed by recombination to pGWB505 destination vector using LR clonase II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The construct was confirmed by sequencing before transforming Agrobacterium tumifecians GV3101. Finally, wild-type and mutant plants were transformed by the floral dip method [42].

Identification, phylogenetic analysis and characterization of bHLH in pineapple

The protein sequences of bHLH transcription factors from Arabidopsis and pineapple were downloaded from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org) and Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html). To identify the bHLH genes, we used the plant transcription factor database (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn). We also downloaded the HMM (Hidden Markov Model) profiles for bHLH (PF00010) from Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org). The pineapple genome was then searched using the HMM profiles by BLAST-P with an e-value set at 0.01. Using the SMART tool (smart.embl-heidelberg.de), the completeness and existence of the core domain in all the sequences were then verified [43]. For phylogenetic analysis, multiple sequence alignments of bHLH sequences from pineapple and Arabidopsis were generated using MUSCLE 3.7 [44] with default parameters. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 7 using Neighbor-joining (NJ) method with default parameters and a bootstrap value of 1000. The isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) of bHLH proteins were predicted using ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/).

Chromosome location, gene structure and conserved motif analysis of AcbHLH

The chromosome location information of AcbHLH genes was collected from Phytozome and their location on the 25 chromosomes were visualized using MapChart software. Additionally, the AcbHLH genes structure, number of exon and intron were then analyzed to study the evolutionary and structural diversity of bHLH genes, the exon-intron structure of AcbHLHs was illustrated using gene structure and display server (GSDS) [45]. The conserved motifs of pineapple bHLHs were predicted using MEME program [46]. Parameters were set to any number of repetitions, motif width of 10–200 residues, and searching for ten motifs, with all other settings in default.

RNA-Seq analysis for different organs in pineapple

Total RNA isolated from various stages of development of gynoecium, ovule, stamen, petal, sepal, root, leaf and flower pineapple was used for library preparation followed by RNA-seq as described previously [47]. Briefly, using Plant RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Strasse 1, Hilden, Germany) the total RNA was isolated. The cDNA library was prepared using NEBNext UltraTM RNA library preparation kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The quality of the libraries was determined on the Agilent Bioanalyzer system and sequenced on a HiSeq2500 sequencing instrument using 150 bp paired-end protocol. After sequencing, raw reads were filtered by removing the adapter sequences and low-quality sequences using TRIMMOMATIC v0.3. The published pineapple genome was used as the reference genome [29], and reads were aligned to the pineapple genome by using TopHat v2.1.1 [48]. Alignment results were processed using Cufflinks, and FPKM values were calculated by using Cuffdiff (FC ≥ 2, FDR ≤ 0.05) following the method described previously [49]. The abundance of pineapple bHLH transcripts was expressed in FPKM (Additional Table S6), and a heatmap was generated based on the log2 (FPKM+ 1) using pheatmap package of R software.

Quantitative real-time qRT-PCR

After the RNA isolation from the desired plant sample, TransGen cDNA preparation kit was used to prepare cDNA using one μg of total RNA. The qRT-PCR was carried out using 2X qPCR superMix (TransGen) in 20 μL reaction volumes using Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch™ real-time PCR machine (Bio-Rad, Singapore). The reaction conditions for qRT-PCR included the following steps: 2 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 10 s at 95 °C and annealing for 15 s at 60 °C, and extension for 15 s at 72 °C. At least three biological replicates were used for each experiment with three technical replicates. The fold change in the expression of genes was determined using the Livak method (2−ΔΔC T), and the pineapple ef1α gene was used as the internal control [50]. The primers used in this study are listed in additional Table S7.

Microscopy

For confocal microscopy, the roots of 7-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were mounted on a slide and examined under a TCS SP8 microscope (Leica).

Statistical analysis

A two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to analyze statistical significance and results are represented as the mean values ± SE of three biological replicates.

Availability of data and materials

All the data and materials that are required to reproduce these findings can be shared by contacting the corresponding author. All the protein and DNA sequences analysed during this study are included in this published article as additional file S8 and S9. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI SRA repository under accession number PRJEB38680 [51].

Abbreviations

bHLH:

Basic helix-loop-helix proteins

UTR :

Untranslated region

LG :

Linkage groups

GSDS:

Gene Structure Display Server

HMM:

Hidden Markov Models

MEGA:

Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis

MEME:

Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation

RT-qPCR:

Real-time Quantitative PCR

SMART:

Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool

AtCIB2:

Arabidopsis thaliana CIB2

AcCIB2:

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) CIB2

FPKM:

Fragments Per Kilobase Million

References

  1. Chen WJ, Zhu T. Networks of transcription factors with roles in environmental stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(12):591–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lai X, Stigliani A, Vachon G, Carles C, Smaczniak C, Zubieta C, Kaufmann K, Parcy F. Building transcription factor binding site models to understand gene regulation in plants. Mol Plant. 2019;12(6):743–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carretero-Paulet L, Galstyan A, Roig-Villanova I, Martinez-Garcia JF, Bilbao-Castro JR, Robertson DL. Genome-wide classification and evolutionary analysis of the bHLH family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis, poplar, rice, moss, and algae. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(3):1398–412.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang R, Zhao P, Kong N, Lu R, Pei Y, Huang C, Ma H, Chen Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the potato bHLH transcription factor family. Genes. 2018;9(1):54.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian S, Li L, Wei M, Yang F. Genome-wide analysis of basic helix-loop-helix superfamily members related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). PeerJ. 2019;7:e7768.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pires N, Dolan L. Origin and diversification of basic-helix-loop-helix proteins in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(4):862–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yingqi H, Ahmad N, Yuanyuan T, Jianyu L, Liyan W, Gang W, Xiuming L, Yuanyuan D, Fawei W, Weican L, Wang G, Liu X, Dong Y, Wang F, Liu W, Li X, Zhao X, Yao N, Li H. Genome-wide identification, expression analysis, and subcellular localization of Carthamus tinctorius bHLH transcription factors. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin Y-J, Li M-J, Hsing H-C, Chen T-K, Yang T-T, Ko S-S. Spike activator 1, encoding a bHLH, mediates axillary bud development and spike initiation in Phalaenopsis aphrodite. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5406.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Li X, Li K, Liu H, Lin C. Multiple bHLH proteins form heterodimers to mediate CRY2-dependent regulation of flowering-time in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(10):e1003861.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson KA, Lopes JM. Survey and summary: Saccharomyces cerevisiae basic helix-loop-helix proteins regulate diverse biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(7):1499–505.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ke YZ, Wu YW, Zhou HJ, Chen P, Wang MM, Liu MM, Li PF, Yang J, Li JN, Du H. Genome-wide survey of the bHLH super gene family in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):115.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurt F, Filiz E. Genome-wide and comparative analysis of bHLH38, bHLH39, bHLH100 and bHLH101 genes in Arabidopsis, tomato, rice, soybean and maize: insights into iron (Fe) homeostasis. Biometals. 2018;31(4):489–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bao S, Hua C, Huang G, Cheng P, Gong X, Shen L, Yu H. Molecular basis of natural variation in photoperiodic flowering responses. Dev Cell. 2019;50(1):90–101 e103.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu B, Yang Z, Gomez A, Liu B, Lin C, Oka Y. Signaling mechanisms of plant cryptochromes in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res. 2016;129(2):137–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen M, Chory J. Phytochrome signaling mechanisms and the control of plant development. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21(11):664–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Q, Lin C. Mechanisms of cryptochrome-mediated photoresponses in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2020;71:103–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fantini E, Sulli M, Zhang L, Aprea G, Jiménez-Gómez JM, Bendahmane A, Perrotta G, Giuliano G, Facella P. Pivotal roles of cryptochromes 1a and 2 in tomato development and physiology. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(2):732–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu H, Yu X, Li K, Klejnot J, Yang H, Lisiero D, Lin C. Photoexcited CRY2 interacts with CIB1 to regulate transcription and floral initiation in Arabidopsis. Science. 2008;322(5907):1535–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad M, Cashmore AR. HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor. Nature. 1993;366(6451):162–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao S, He S, Lv H, Zhang J, Aslam M, Cheng H, Hu A, Cao G, Zhang X, Yu Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the Cryptochrome gene family in plants. Trop Plant Biol. 2020;13(1):117–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang Y, Baxter R, Smith BS, Partch CL, Colbert CL, Deisenhofer J. Crystal structure of cryptochrome 3 from Arabidopsis thaliana and its implications for photolyase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(47):17701–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gartner W. In-Planta expression: searching for the genuine chromophores of Cryptochrome-3 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Photochem Photobiol. 2017;93(1):382–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu H, Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhao X, Imaizumi T, Somers DE, Tobin EM, Lin C. Arabidopsis CRY2 and ZTL mediate blue-light regulation of the transcription factor CIB1 by distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(43):17582–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Q, Su T, He W, Ren H, Liu S, Chen Y, Gao L, Hu X, Lu H, Cao S, et al. Photooligomerization determines photosensitivity and photoreactivity of plant cryptochromes. Mol Plant. 2020;13:398–413.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Y, Li X, Ma D, Chen Z, Wang JW, Liu H. CIB1 and CO interact to mediate CRY2 dependent regulation of flowering. EMBO Rep. 2018;19(10):e45762.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Toledo-Ortiz G, Huq E, Quail PH. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell. 2003;15(8):1749–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heim MA, Jakoby M, Werber M, Martin C, Weisshaar B, Bailey PC. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family in plants: a genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20(5):735–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang T, Lv W, Zhang H, Ma L, Li P, Ge L, Li G. Genome-wide analysis of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor family in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):235.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ming R, VanBuren R, Wai CM, Tang H, Schatz MC, Bowers JE, Lyons E, Wang ML, Chen J, Biggers E, et al. The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat Genet. 2015;47(12):1435–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferre-D'Amare AR, Prendergast GC, Ziff EB, Burley SK. Recognition by max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain. Nature. 1993;363(6424):38–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao Y, Zhang YY, Liu H, Zhang XS, Ni R, Wang PY, Gao S, Lou HX, Cheng AX. Functional characterization of a liverworts bHLH transcription factor involved in the regulation of bisbibenzyls and flavonoids biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):497.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin C, Shalitin D. Cryptochrome structure and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:469–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Amasino RM, Michaels SD. The timing of flowering. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(2):516–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hou N, Cao Y, Li F, Yuan W, Bian H, Wang J, Zhu M, Han N. Epigenetic regulation of miR396 expression by SWR1-C and the effect of miR396 on leaf growth and developmental phase transition in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(19):5217–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. D'Amico-Damião V, Carvalho RF. Cryptochrome-related abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1897.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu H, Liu B, Zhao C, Pepper M, Lin C. The action mechanisms of plant cryptochromes. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16(12):684–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Delgado D, Ballesteros I, Torres-Contreras J, Mena M, Fenoll C. Dynamic analysis of epidermal cell divisions identifies specific roles for COP10 in Arabidopsis stomatal lineage development. Planta. 2012;236(2):447–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kang CY, Lian HL, Wang FF, Huang JR, Yang HQ. Cryptochromes, phytochromes, and COP1 regulate light-controlled stomatal development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21(9):2624–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mao J, Zhang YC, Sang Y, Li QH, Yang HQ. From the cover: a role for Arabidopsis cryptochromes and COP1 in the regulation of stomatal opening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(34):12270–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Aslam M, Fakher B, Jakada BH, Zhao L, Cao S, Cheng Y, Qin Y. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of CBL-CIPK gene family in pineapple (Ananas comosus) and the role of AcCBL in abiotic and biotic stress response. Biomolecules. 2019;9(7):293.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Letunic I, Bork P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D493–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1296–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W202–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen P, Li Y, Zhao L, Hou Z, Yan M, Hu B, Liu Y, Azam SM, Zhang Z, Rahman ZU, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporter gene family in pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.) reveal the role of AcABCG38 in pollen development. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2150.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(3):562–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dai X, Bai Y, Zhao L, Dou X, Liu Y, Wang L, Li Y, Li W, Hui Y, Huang X, et al. H2A.Z represses gene expression by modulating promoter nucleosome structure and enhancer histone modifications in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2017;10(10):1274–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang L, Li Y, Jin X, Liu L, Dai X, Liu Y, Zhao L, Zheng P, Wang X, Liu Y, et al. Floral transcriptomes reveal gene networks in pineapple floral growth and fruit development. Communications Biology. 2020;3(1):500.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of Qin lab for their assistance in the experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1605212; 31970333), a Guangxi Distinguished Experts Fellowship and Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi (Gui Ke 2018-266-Z01) to Y.Q. and postdoctoral project from Guangxi University to M. A and X.N. Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi—Research and application of ecological and high efficient cultivation techniques for dominant and characteristic fruits (AA17204097–6). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mohammad Aslam and Bello Hassan Jakada contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Key Laboratory of Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Mohammad Aslam, Bello Hassan Jakada, Xiaoping Niu, Zhenxia Su, Yan Cheng & Yuan Qin

  2. Guangxi Key Lab of Sugarcane Biology, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, Guangxi, China

    Mohammad Aslam, Xiaoping Niu & Yuan Qin

  3. College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Beenish Fakher & Zhenxia Su

  4. College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Joseph G. Greaves & Yan Cheng

  5. College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Shijiang Cao

  6. Horticulture Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning Investigation Station of South Subtropical Fruit Trees, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanning, 530007, China

    Xiaomei Wang

Authors
  1. Mohammad Aslam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bello Hassan Jakada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beenish Fakher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joseph G. Greaves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoping Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhenxia Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yan Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shijiang Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaomei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yuan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A. and Y.Q. conceived and designed the research. M.A., B.H.J., B.F. and J.G.G. performed the experiments. M.A. and B.H.J. analyzed data. X.N., Z.S., S.C., and Y.C. helped with experiments. M.A. and B.H.J. wrote and revised the paper. X.W. provided the materials and assisted in the revision of the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaomei Wang or Yuan Qin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The properties of bHLH genes in pineapple.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Exon-intron structure of pineapple bHLH genes. Blue boxes indicate untranslated upstream/downstream regions, red boxes indicate exons; black lines indicate introns.

Additional file 3: Figure S3

. Alignment of amino acid sequences from the bHLH domain region. Gene IDs in red represent pineapple CIB genes.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Amino acid sequences from the bHLH domain region. Gene IDs in red represent pineapple CIB genes.

Additional file 5: Figure S5.

The motif composition of pineapple pHLH proteins. The motifs, numbers 1–10, are displayed in different colored boxes. The number in brackets at the end of each protein represent the domains present in it. The sequence information for each motif is provided in the bottom box. Gene IDs in red represent pineapple CIB genes.

Additional file 6: Table S6

. The expression profile of pineapple bHLH genes in different tissue and developmental stages. Details of the samples are: sepal Se1–Se4, gynoecium Gy1- Gy7, ovule Ov1–Ov7, petal Pe1–Pe3, stamen St1–St6, fruit ‘Fr_S1–Fr_S7’, root ‘Ro’, leaf ‘Le’, and flower ‘Fl’ where ‘S’ is the abbreviation for ‘stage.

Additional file 7: Table S7

. List of primers used in the present study.

Additional file 8: Table S8

. Protein sequences analysed in the present study.

Additional file 9: Table S9

. DNA sequences analysed in the present study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aslam, M., Jakada, B.H., Fakher, B. et al. Genome-wide study of pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) bHLH transcription factors indicates that cryptochrome-interacting bHLH2 (AcCIB2) participates in flowering time regulation and abiotic stress response. BMC Genomics 21, 735 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07152-2

Keywords

  • bHLH
  • CIB2
  • Flowering time
  • Abiotic stress
  • Pineapple

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us