Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Jiaxian Red cattle using whole-genome sequencing data

BMC Genomics volume 22, Article number: 43 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Native cattle breeds are an important source of genetic variation because they might carry alleles that enable them to adapt to local environment and tough feeding conditions. Jiaxian Red, a Chinese native cattle breed, is reported to have originated from crossbreeding between taurine and indicine cattle; their history as a draft and meat animal dates back at least 30 years. Using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of 30 animals from the core breeding farm, we investigated the genetic diversity, population structure and genomic regions under selection of Jiaxian Red cattle. Furthermore, we used 131 published genomes of world-wide cattle to characterize the genomic variation of Jiaxian Red cattle.

Results

The population structure analysis revealed that Jiaxian Red cattle harboured the ancestry with East Asian taurine (0.493), Chinese indicine (0.379), European taurine (0.095) and Indian indicine (0.033). Three methods (nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium decay and runs of homozygosity) implied the relatively high genomic diversity in Jiaxian Red cattle. We used θπ, CLR, FST and XP-EHH methods to look for the candidate signatures of positive selection in Jiaxian Red cattle. A total number of 171 (θπ and CLR) and 17 (FST and XP-EHH) shared genes were identified using different detection strategies. Functional annotation analysis revealed that these genes are potentially responsible for growth and feed efficiency (CCSER1), meat quality traits (ROCK2, PPP1R12A, CYB5R4, EYA3, PHACTR1), fertility (RFX4, SRD5A2) and immune system response (SLAMF1, CD84 and SLAMF6).

Conclusion

We provide a comprehensive overview of sequence variations in Jiaxian Red cattle genomes. Selection signatures were detected in genomic regions that are possibly related to economically important traits in Jiaxian Red cattle. We observed a high level of genomic diversity and low inbreeding in Jiaxian Red cattle. These results provide a basis for further resource protection and breeding improvement of this breed.

Background

Domesticated cattle can be categorized into two subspecies: humpless taurine (Bos taurus) and humped indicine (Bos indicus) with some subsequent hybridization events resulting in the descendant hybrid breeds being adapted to various environments [1]. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been used to detect population structure and identify polymorphisms that might affect the economic traits of livestock animals. Recently, the WGS analysis of domestic cattle revealed that the worldwide cattle could be divided into five continental groups: European taurine, Eurasian taurine, East Asian taurine, Chinese indicine and Indian indicine [2]. Based on WGS many studies initially focused on the genetic architecture and economic traits under positive selection of European commercial breeds [3, 4], and then gradually focused on the adaptable indigenous breeds, such as African cattle [5, 6]. They identified genomic variations characteristics (new genes or genetic pathways) of native cattle adapting to local environments, such as climate challenges and disease resistance [5, 6]. These evidences can provide options for designing genetic breeding strategies to improve the adaptability and productivity of cattle. However, there are a limited number of studies on the genomic variation of native cattle breeds in China, and even fewer reports have been reported from Jiaxian Red cattle [2, 7, 8].

Jiaxian Red is an indigenous cattle breed in China, and it has been intensively bred for beef during over the past 30 years, leading to genetic improvement in production traits [9]. In the early production practice, the local people mainly used the draught as the selection standard, which led to the large body size of Jiaxian Red cattle. For now, Jiaxian Red cattle have been evolved into a beef cattle breed with excellent meat quality, tough feeding resistance and high fertility [10]. Previous studies have used various methods to study the genomic diversity and population structure of the Jiaxian Red cattle breed, e.g., mitochondrial, Y chromosome or autosomal data [2, 11, 12]. These studies indicated that Jiaxian Red originated from the crossbreeding between taurine and indicine cattle. Studies attempting to explain the growth and meat quality of Jiaxian Red cattle have focused on single gene SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), such as MYLK4 [13], TRPV1 and TRPA1 [14], and CRTC3 [15]. However, there has been no previous studies using WGS data to identify genes under the selection pressure of this breed.

To expand our knowledge of genomic variations and selective sweeps that may potentially have arisen as a result of recent selection of Jiaxian Red, we performed whole-genome sequencing of 30 Jiaxian Red cattle and identified SNPs based on the Bos taurus reference genome assembly (ARS-UCD1.2). SNPs of Jiaxian Red were compared with those of commercial and native breeds previously collected from around the world.

Results

Sequencing, assembly, and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms

Individual genomes of 30 Jiaxian Red cattle were generated to ~ 10.6 × coverage each and were jointly genotyped with publicly available genomes of five “core” cattle populations [2] and Qinchuan breed (Chinese native beef cattle) (Tables S1 and S2). Five “core” cattle populations comprise European taurine (Hereford and Angus), Eurasian taurine (Gelbvieh, Limousin, Simmental and Jersey), East Asian taurine (Hanwoo, Mishima and Tibetan), Chinese indicine (Wannan, Guangfeng, Ji’an, Leiqiong) and Indian indicine (Tharparkar, Nelore, Sahiwal, Hariana and Gir). In total, ~ 5.0 billion reads of sequences were generated. Using BWA-MEM (0.7.13-r1126), reads were aligned to the Bos taurus reference genome sequence (ARS-UCD1.2) with an average of 11.5 × coverage. We annotated 24,800,431 biallelic SNPs that were discovered in 30 Jiaxian Red cattle. Functional annotation of the polymorphic sites revealed that the vast majority of SNPs were present either intergenic regions (59.2%) or intronic regions (37.8%). Exons contained 0.8% of the total SNPs with 70,165 non-synonymous SNPs and 112,847 synonymous SNPs (Table S3).

The total number of SNPs detected within the breeds was showed in Table S3. The Chinese indicine (29,715,667; Bos indicus) displayed the highest number of SNP, followed by crossbred Jiaxian Red (24,800,431; Bos taurus × Bos indicus), Indian indicine (21,149,877; Bos indicus) and Qinchuan cattle (20,233,594; Bos taurus × Bos indicus). As expected, the SNPs of taurine cattle were significantly lower than that of hybrid and zebu breeds. This distribution pattern of SNPs is consistent with that reported in previous study [2].

Population structure and relationships

To explore relatedness among Jiaxian Red cattle and other cattle breeds distributed worldwide, we conducted ADMIXTURE, neighbor-joining (NJ) and principle component analysis (PCA) using genomic SNPs (Fig. 1). The analyses revealed clear geographic patterns among cattle populations as previous suggested [2]. In the ADMIXTURE analysis, when K=2, the cattle breeds were genetically divided into Bos taurus and Bos indicus ancestry; when K=4, the Jiaxian Red cattle showed clear evidence of genetic heterogeneity with shared genome ancestry with East Asian taurine (0.493), Chinese indicine (0.379), European taurine (0.095) and Indian indicine (0.033) genetic background (Fig. 1a, K=4). The genetic influence of Bos indicus was greater on Jiaxian Red than that on Qinchuan cattle, with an average genetic proportion of 0.412 and 0.292, respectively. The NJ tree and PCA analysis provided similar results, with all the “core” cattle populations forming their own separate clusters, and Jiaxian Red as well as Qinchuan cattle are found at an intermediate position between Bos taurus and Bos indicus (Fig. 1b and c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Population structure and relationships of Jiaxian Red in comparison to several possible ancestral breeds. a Model-based clustering of cattle breeds using ADMIXTURE with K = 2 and K = 4. Breeds are colored by geographic regions and labelled with breed name. b Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships between the ten cattle breeds (161 animals). c Principal component analysis of 10 cattle breeds

Full size image

Patterns of genomic variation

Runs of homozygosity (ROH) are continuous homozygous regions in the DNA sequence of diploid organisms [16]. To evaluate the ROH pattern of Jiaxian Red and other cattle breeds, we divided the length of ROH into four size classes: 0.5–1 Mb, 1–2 Mb, 2-4 Mb, > 4 Mb (Fig. 2a). The presence of long ROH is the result of consanguineous mating, whereas shorter ROH reflect distant ancestral influences [17]. The vast majority of ROH that identified in all breeds are between 0.5–1 Mb in length, but apparently European commercial breeds have more medium (2–4 Mb) and long ROH (> 4 Mb). The total lengths of ROHs in Mishima and European taurine breeds (Jersey, Hereford, Angus and Simmental) are longer than those of Jiaxian Red because European commercial breeds have been artificially selected for a longer period of time (Fig. 2b). In Fig. 2c, our results showed that nucleotide diversity was the highest in Chinese indicine cattle, followed by Jiaxian Red, Qinchuan and Indian indicine cattle. The lowest nucleotide diversity was found for European and East Asian taurine cattle. In contrast, we observed the lowest average genome-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) in Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan cattle and the highest value of LD in Mishima, followed by European taurine (Jersey, Hereford, Simmental and Angus), Hanwoo and zebu cattle (Indian and Chinese indicine) (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Summary statistics for genomic variation. a The distribution of total number of ROH across chromosomes. b The distribution of lengths ROH in each breed. c Genome-wide distribution of nucleotide diversity of each breed in 50 kb windows with 50 kb steps. The horizontal line inside the box indicates the median of this distribution; box limits indicate the first and the thirds quartiles, points shows outliers. Data points outside the whiskers can be considered as outliers. d Genome-wide average LD decay estimated from each breed

Full size image

Functional enrichment analysis of the specific SNPs in Jiaxian red

When compared to five “core” cattle breeds, a total of 1,817,304 SNPs were found specific to Jiaxian Red, which is lower than the zebu cattle groups but higher than the taurine cattle groups (Figure S1). When comparing the two Chinese cattle breeds, Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan cattle shared a relatively high number of SNPs (n=17,828,430), accounting for ~ 72% and ~ 88% of the total SNPs of Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan respectively, indicating that the genetic relationship between the two cattle breeds is very close.

In order to find out the genetic differences between Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan cattle, ANNOVAR software was used to identify the nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) of breeds. We obtained 20,445 and 7266 specific nsSNPs in Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan breeds, respectively. Following the methods by Kawahara-Miki et al. (2011) [18] and Weldenegodguad et al. (2019) [19], we selected genes containing > 5 nsSNPs for each breed. Finally, a total of 617 and 88 genes were identified in Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan. From DAVID gene ontology, 21 significant (P< 0.05) GO BP terms were enriched in Jiaxian Red (Figure S2 and Table S4). The most significant term was associated with immune function (Antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I, GO:0002474), including one gene BOLA. Three terms were associated with sensory perception functions, such as “Photoreceptor cell maintenance, GO:0045494”, “Sensory perception of light stimulus, GO:0050953” and “Sensory perception of sound, GO:0007605”. Among the other genes were those related to molecular functions that might contribute to the specific characteristics of the Jiaxian Red breed. In Qinchuan cattle, four significant (P< 0.05) GO BP terms were enriched, including biological process “Cilium assembly, GO:0042384”, “Epithelial cilium movement, GO:0003351”, “Regulation of centrosome duplication, GO:0010824” and “Positive regulation of intracellular protein transport, GO:0090316” (Figure S3 and Table S5).

Genome-wide selective sweep test

We applied the nucleotide diversity analysis (θπ) and the composite likelihood ratio (CLR) methods to detect genomic regions related to selection in Jiaxian Red breed. Two methods showed outlier signals (top 1%) in overlapping regions and were therefore considered as candidate selective regions. A total of 1199 (θπ) and 351 (CLR) genes with selection signatures in Jiaxian Red cattle were identified, 171 of which were overlapped (Tables S6 and S7). We performed functional enrichment analysis using KEGG pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) for overlapped genes. The only significant KEGG pathway in Jiaxian Red was “Regulation of actin cytoskeleton” (corrected P-value < 0.05, Table S8) involving 6 genes (ITGA1, ENAH, MYLK3, ROCK2, PFN4, PPP1R12A), which is related to meat tenderness [20, 21], feed efficiency and compensatory gain in cattle [22]. Over-representation analysis of GO terms shows that Jiaxian Red has increased GO categories involved in cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity involved in apoptotic process (TNFAIP8, DPEP1, SNCA), regulation of microtubule polymerization (SLAIN2, MAPRE1, SNCA) (Table S9).

FST and XP-EHH test were also performed to detect the positive selection signatures between Jiaxian Red and the commercial breeds (Angus and Red Angus) (Fig. 3a). Based on the analysis, we obtained 1382 and 982 putatively advantageous positively selected genes from FST and XP-EHH methods, respectively (Tables S10 and S11); of these, 238 genes were detected in both methods and 17 genes were potentially selected candidate genes in Jiaxian Red (Table S12). Among these, strong signals of differentiation were obtained in the regions containing well known candidate genes related to meat quality traits (CYB5R4, EYA3, PHACTR1) and feed efficiency (CCSER1) [23,24,25,26]. It’s worth noted that four overlapped genes (POLR3B, RAB11FIP2, RFX4 and SLAMF1) were detected among the 4 mentioned selection methods, indicating that these genes were strongly selected in Jiaxian red cattle. Among them, RFX4 associated with fertility [27, 28], SLAMF1 involved in the immune system response [29], POLR3B related to the autosomal-recessive hypomyelinating leukoencephalopathy [30], and RAB11FIP2 plays a role in the secretory pathway [31].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of the signatures of positive selection in the genome of Jiaxian Red. a Manhattan plot of selective sweeps in Jiaxian Red. b Venn diagram showing the genes overlap among θπ, CLR, FST and XP-EHH. c Nucleotide diversity and Tajima’s D at the PPP1R12A gene region. d FST and Tajima’s D plots of the SLAMF1, CD84 and SLAMF6 genomic regions. e SNPs with minor allele frequencies > 0.05 are used to construct haplotype patterns (Chr 3: 8.97–9.18 Mb). The major allele at each SNP position in Jiaxian Red is colored in yellow, the minor one in green

Full size image

Discussion

The characterization of population structure and genetic diversity is essential for genetic assessment, understanding of environmental adaptation, as well as utilization and conservation of cattle breed genetic resources. We explored the population genetic structure of Jiaxian Red cattle in the context of the cattle breeds/populations with potential ancestors [2]. As shown in the ADMIXTURE analysis (Fig. 1a), the ancestral contributions of Jiaxian Red cattle came from East Asian taurine (~ 49%), Chinese indicine (~ 38%), European taurine (10%) and Indian indicine (~ 3%). Jiaxian Red is closest related to the Qinchuan breed, both of which are located in the central area of China, but Jiaxian Red shared more Bos indicus ancestry.

The nucleotide diversity of Jiaxian Red (mean θπ = 0.0029) was lower than that of Chinese indicine cattle (mean θπ = 0.0037), but approximately two times higher than that of European breeds (0.0010~0.0013). The highest genetic diversity observed in Chinese indicine cattle was in agreement with the results of Chen et al. (2018) [2], who reported the presence of Banteng (B. javanicus) introgression in Chinese indicine. The relative high level of genomic diversity found in Jiaxian Red is likely the results of hybridization with taurine and indicine, and may also reflect the weaker and shorter selection history. Jiaxian Red (mean θπ = 0.0029) and Qinchuan cattle (mean θπ = 0.0026) showed a similar level of nucleotide diversity (Fig. 2), which may be related to their similar genetic background. In addition, the patterns of LD decay in each breed was largely consistent with the results of nucleotide diversity. We also analyzed the ROH distribution pattern of Jiaxian Red by comparing with other cattle breeds. ROH are common in cattle autosomes, but the observed breed differences in the patterns of ROH length and burden suggested differences in breed origins and recent management [17]. Our results showed that Jiaxian Red exhibits larger amounts of short/medium ROH (0.5 to 2 Mb) and the lowest quantities of average ROH in comparison to the cattle breeds analyzed in this study, which is consistent with the reported ROH patterns of other taurine-zebu hybrid breeds [17].

In our analysis, Jiaxian Red and Qinchuan cattle showed a very close genetic relationship. In order to understand the genetic differences between the two breeds, we performed the GO enrichment analysis of genes harboring > 5 specific nsSNPs. Genes related to the immunity and “Sensory perception” were enriched in Jiaxian Red, which reflects the adaptability of Jiaxian Red cattle to environment. In addition, we also identified significant signatures of selective sweeps in Jiaxian Red breed. Jiaxian Red has been intensively bred for beef during over the past 30 years, leading to the genetic improvement in production traits, especially the characteristics of marbled meat. Marbling (intramuscular fat) is a valuable trait that impacts on meat quality and an important factor determining price of beef in the beef market. Jiaxian Red genome showed signs of selection in some genes of the “Regulation of actin cytoskeleton” pathway (ITGA1, ENAH, MYLK3, ROCK2, PFN4, PPP1R12A), which plays an important role in meat quality traits [20,21,22]. To better understand possible explanations for the selective pressures, we have explored the most likely biological functions of these genes. For example, protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12A (PPP1R12A), also known as MYPT1, is an important protein widely expressed in various cell types and plays a role in skeletal muscle insulin signaling [32]. PPP1R12A has been reported to be one of the highly expressed genes in intramuscular adipose tissue in the pig [33], and it has also been found under positive selection in Hanwoo (a famous beef cattle breed in Korea) [34], indicating that this gene may be related with meat marbling (intramuscular fat content) of Jiaxian Red (Fig. 3c). ROCK2, a gene that regulates cytokinesis, smooth muscle contraction and the formation of actin stress fibers, is involved in pathway associated with muscle/adipose tissue function in pigs with divergent phenotypes for fatness traits [35]. There are limited available publications to study this gene in cattle, but relative ROCK1 gene is known for meat tenderness [36] and intramuscular fat (IMF) [35]. ROCK1 gene has been considered one of the candidate genes related to IMF under selection in Ankole cattle [5].

When comparing the selection signatures of Jiaxian Red cattle with commercial breeds, two positively selected genes associated with muscle development (PHACTR1 and EYA3) and one gene (CYB5R4) influencing the fatty acid metabolism have been identified in Jiaxian Red. PHACTR1 is a member of the phosphatase and actin regulator family, which is involved in regulating the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. It has been reported in the literature that PHACTR1 is a genetic susceptibility locus for fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) [25]. EYA genes are associated with the proper development of muscles [37, 38]. EYA3-knockout mice exhibited the reduced movement [24]. CYB5R4 is an electron donor for fatty acid desaturation by stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD) [39]. The C18 desaturation index (C18: 1/C18: 0) of CYB5R4-knockout mice was significantly reduced [40]. This gene has also been reported as one of the candidate genes for the QTL for oleic acid percentage in Japanese Black cattle [23], indicating that CYB5R4 may be related with meat tenderness of Jiaxian Red. Feed efficiency is an important economic feature that affects beef production costs [41]. We detected positively selected gene CCSER1 in Jiaxian Red, which was reported to be associated with the growth and feed efficiency in beef cattle [26].

Chinese native cattle are generally more resistant to disease than their commercial counterparts. Our selection analysis identified several genes involved in the immune system, in particular the SLAMF1 gene that overlapped among the four selection methods. We found a region on BTA3: 8.97–9.18 Mbp containing three SLAMF (signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family) genes (SLAMF1, CD84 and SLAMF6) that showed a strong signal of positive selection in Jiaxian Red. The positive selection signals around this region are further confirmed by significantly lower values of Tajima’s D and long haplotype patterns in Jiaxian Red (Fig. 3d and e). SLAMF receptors are involved in the regulation and interconnection of both innate and adaptive immune responses [29, 42]. The result suggested that this region may be one of the candidate regions of high disease resistance of Chinese native cattle, which may be useful as a genetic target for improving disease resistance in cattle breeding. But the haplotype of Jiaxian Red in this region is obviously not fixed, and similar haplotype pattern exists in Qinchuan cattle. This further suggested that Jiaxian red cattle did not experience the same intensive artificial selection as European cattle breeds. In addition, two genes (RFX4, SRD5A2) associated with fertility [27, 28] displayed signals of positive selection in Jiaxian Red cattle. These genes might be related to the strong reproductive performance of Jiaxian Red cattle.

Jiaxian Red breed is a valuable and widely used genetic resource in local area due to its higher beef productivity and better adaptability. As cattle genetic resources are being depleted and given the importance of this vital genetic resource, designing breeding programs that would help improve and conserve Chinese native cattle is crucial. With this regard, our results provide a basis for further research on the genomic characteristics of Jiaxian Red cattle in relation to economically important traits.

Conclusions

This study provided a comprehensive overview of genomic variations in Jiaxian Red cattle by using WGS data. The characterization of population structure and genomic diversity will point out the direction for genetic assessment and development of reasonable breeding strategies of Jiaxian Red cattle. Moreover, we identified a series of candidate genes that may be important for the meat quality traits, growth and feed efficiency, immune response and fertility of this breed. These results provide a basis for further research on the genome characteristics of other important local beef cattle in the world.

Methods

Samples and sequencing

Thirty blood samples of Jiaxian Red cattle were collected from the core breeding farm of Jiaxian Red Cattle Breeding Center (Table S1). The animals were released after sampled. Genomic DNA was extracted by the standard phenol-chloroform method [43]. The paired-end libraries with the average insert size of 500 bp were constructed for each individual, with an average read length of 150 bp. Sequencing was performed using Illumina NovaSeq instruments at Novogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing, China.

To explore the ancestry proportions of Jiaxian Red and compare the genetic diversity with worldwide cattle breeds, we collected additional 131 samples according to the five “core” groups proposed by Chen et al. (2018) [2]. These samples include European cattle breeds (Hereford (n=10), Red Angus (n=5), Angus (n=10), Simmental (n=8), Limousin (n=1), Gelbvieh (n=3) and Jersey (n=11)), Korean native breed (Hanwoo, n=15), Japanese native breed (Mishima, n=7), Chinese native breeds (Tibetan (n=4), Qinchuan (n=34), Leiqiong (n=3), Guangfeng (n=4), Ji’an (n=4), Wannan (n=5)) and India-Pakistan cattle breeds ((Tharparkar (n=1), Sahiwal (n=1), Hariana (n=1), Nelore (n=1), Gir (n=2) and unknown (n=1)) (Table S2). A total of 161 animal samples were used in this study. All samples were divided into six groups (European taurine, Eurasian taurine, East Asian taurine, Indian indicine, Chinese indicine and crossbreed) based on the reports of Chen et al. (2018) [2].

Reads mapping and SNP calling

The Burrows-Wheeler Aligner BWA-MEM (v0.7.13-r1126) [44] with default parameters was used to align the clean reads to the Bos taurus reference assembly ARS-UCD1.2. Picard tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard) was used to filter potential duplicates reads (REMOVE_DUPLICATES = true). The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, version 3.6–0-g89b7209) was performed to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The raw SNPs were called using the “HaplotypeCaller”, “GenotypeGVCFs” and “SelectVariants” of GATK. After SNP calling, we used the “VariantFiltration” to discard sequencing and alignment artifacts from the SNPs with the parameters “QD < 2.0, FS > 60.0, MQ < 40.0, MQRankSum < -12.5, ReadPosRankSum < -8.0 and SOR > 3.0” and mean sequencing depth of variants (all individuals) “<1/3× and >3×”. Based on the annotation file (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/002/263/795/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2_genomic.gff) of the Bos taurus reference genome, a transcript FASTA file for database was built using the retrieve_seq_from_fasta.pl module of ANNOVAR, and then the functional annotation for each SNP was performed using the table_annovar.pl module of ANNOVAR [45]. We performed GO analysis for genes containing specific non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID).

Population structure and phylogenetic analysis

We pruned the SNPs in high levels of pair-wise LD using PLINK [46] with the parameter (−-indep-pair-wise 50 5 0.2) to perform principal component analysis (PCA) and ADMIXTURE analysis. PCA was conducted using the smartPCA program in the EIGENSOFT v5.0 package [47]. Population structure analysis was carried out using ADMIXTURE v1.3 [48] with kinship (K) set from 2 to 8 (Table S13). The unrooted NJ tree was constructed with PLINK using the matrix of pairwise genetic distances and visualized with MEGA v5.0 [49] and FigTree v1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and ROH detection

We used VCFtools [50] to estimate nucleotide diversity of each breed in window sizes of 50 kb with 50 kb increment. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay with physical distance between SNPs was calculated and visualized by using PopLDdecay software [51] with default parameters. ROHs were identified using the --homozyg option implemented in the PLINK, which slides a window of 50 SNPs (−homozyg-window-snp 50) across the genome estimating homozygosity. The following settings were performed for ROH identification: (1) required minimum density (−homozyg-density 50); (2) number of heterozygotes allowed in a window (−homozyg-window-het 3); (3) the number of missing calls allowed in window (−homozyg-window-missing 5). The number and length of ROH for each breed were estimated and length of ROH was divided into four categories: 0.5–1 Mb, 1–2 Mb, 2-4 Mb, > 4 Mb.

Selective sweep identification

Genome scans for selection in Jiaxian Red cattle were performed using the following strategy. First, we detect the selection signatures within Jiaxian Red cattle using two different statistics, the nucleotide diversity (θπ) and the composite likelihood ratio (CLR) [52]. The nucleotide diversity was estimated based on a sliding window approach with windows of 50 kb and a step of 20 kb using VCFtools [50]. The CLR test was calculated for sites in non-overlapping 50 kb windows by using SweepFinder2 [53]. Empirical P values were calculated for π and CLR windows, and the overlap of the top 1% windows of each method were considered as candidate signatures of selection.

Second, we performed comparisons between Jiaxian Red versus commercial cattle breeds (Angus and Red Angus) using fixation index (FST) and cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH). FST analysis was calculated in 50 kb windows with a 20 kb step using VCFtools [50]. XP-EHH statistics based on the extended haplotype was calculated for each population pair using selscan v1.1 [54]. For the XP-EHH selection scan, our test statistic was the average normalized XP-EHH score in each 50 kb region. An XP-EHH score is directional: a positive score suggests that selection is likely to have happened in Jiaxian Red cattle, whereas a negative score suggests the same about reference population. Significant genomic regions were identified by P-value < 0.01. Genomic regions identified by at least two methods were considered to be candidate regions of positive selection. Tajima’s D statistic was computed by using VCFtools for each candidate gene.

To gain a better understanding of the gene functions and signaling pathways of the identified candidate genes, online GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using KOBAS 3.0 [55]. The GO and KEGG pathways were considered to be significantly enriched only when the corrected P value was less than 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

Sequences are available from GenBank with the Bioproject accession numbers PRJNA634989.

Abbreviations

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

WGS:

Whole-genome sequencing

θπ:

Nucleotide diversity

CLR:

Composite likelihood ratio

F ST :

Fixation index

XP-EHH:

Cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

NJ:

Neighbor-joining

PCA:

Principle component analysis

ROH:

Runs of homozygosity

LD:

Linkage disequilibrium

nsSNPs:

Nonsynonymous SNPs

References

  1. Decker JE, McKay SD, Rolf MM, Kim J, Molina Alcalá A, Sonstegard TS, Hanotte O, Götherström A, Seabury CM, Praharani L, et al. Worldwide patterns of ancestry, divergence, and admixture in domesticated cattle. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(3):e1004254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen N, Cai Y, Chen Q, Li R, Wang K, Huang Y, Hu S, Huang S, Zhang H, Zheng Z, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stothard P, Choi J-W, Basu U, Sumner-Thomson JM, Meng Y, Liao X, Moore SS. Whole genome resequencing of black Angus and Holstein cattle for SNP and CNV discovery. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Consortium TBH. Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science. 2009;324(5926):528–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taye M, Kim J, Yoon SH, Lee W, Hanotte O, Dessie T, Kemp S, Mwai OA, Caetano-Anolles K, Cho S, et al. Whole genome scan reveals the genetic signature of African Ankole cattle breed and potential for higher quality beef. BMC Genet. 2017;18(1):11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim J, Hanotte O, Mwai OA, Dessie T, Bashir S, Diallo B, Agaba M, Kim K, Kwak W, Sung S, et al. The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mei C, Wang H, Liao Q, Wang L, Cheng G, Wang H, Zhao C, Zhao S, Song J, Guang X, et al. Genetic architecture and selection of Chinese cattle revealed by whole genome resequencing. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(3):688–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mei C, Junjvlieke Z, Raza SHA, Wang H, Cheng G, Zhao C, Zhu W, Zan L. Copy number variation detection in Chinese indigenous cattle by whole genome sequencing. Genomics. 2020;112(1):831–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang F, Zheng E, Geng E, Zhang J, Xiao Y. Summary of the improvement work of breeding and conservation of Jiaxian red cattle (in Chinese). J Yellow Cattle Sci. 1996;22(3):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y. Animal genetic resources in China-bovines (in Chinese). Beijing: China Agriculture Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xia X, Qu K, Zhang G, Jia Y, Ma Z, Zhao X, Huang Y, Chen H, Huang B, Lei C. Comprehensive analysis of the mitochondrial DNA diversity in Chinese cattle. Anim Genet. 2019;50(1):70–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia X, Yao Y, Li C, Zhang F, Qu K, Chen H, Huang B, Lei C. Genetic diversity of Chinese cattle revealed by Y-SNP and Y-STR markers. Anim Genet. 2019;50(1):64–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng L, Zhang G, Dong Y, Wen Y, Dong D, Lei C, Qi X, Chen H, Huo L, Huang Y. Genetic variant of MYLK4 gene and its association with growth traits in Chinese cattle. Anim Biotechnol. 2019;30(1):30–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu J, Wang J, Yue B, Xing-tang F, Zhang C, Ma Y, Hu L, Bai Y, Qi X, Chen H. Research on association between variants and haplotypes of TRPV1 and TRPA1 genes with growth traits in three cattle breeds. Anim Biotechnol. 2019;30(3):202–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu S, Ning Y, Raza SHA, Zhang C, Zhang L, Cheng G, Wang H, Schreurs N, Zan L. Genetic variants and haplotype combination in the bovine CRTC3 affected conformation traits in two Chinese native cattle breeds (Bos Taurus). Genomics. 2019;111(6):1736–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nandolo W, Utsunomiya YT, Mészáros G, Wurzinger M, Khayadzadeh N, Torrecilha RBP, Mulindwa HA, Gondwe TN, Waldmann P, Ferenčaković M, et al. Misidentification of runs of homozygosity islands in cattle caused by interference with copy number variation or large intermarker distances. Genet Sel Evol. 2018;50(1):43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Purfield DC, Berry DP, McParland S, Bradley DG. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet. 2012;13(1):70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawahara-Miki R, Tsuda K, Shiwa Y, Arai-Kichise Y, Matsumoto T, Kanesaki Y, Oda S-I, Ebihara S, Yajima S, Yoshikawa H, et al. Whole-genome resequencing shows numerous genes with nonsynonymous SNPs in the Japanese native cattle Kuchinoshima-Ushi. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Weldenegodguad M, Popov R, Pokharel K, Ammosov I, Ming Y, Ivanova Z, Kantanen J. Whole-genome sequencing of three native cattle breeds originating from the northernmost cattle farming regions. Front Genet. 2019;9:728.

  20. Damon M, Wyszynska-Koko J, Vincent A, Hérault F, Lebret B. Comparison of muscle transcriptome between pigs with divergent meat quality phenotypes identifies genes related to muscle metabolism and structure. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guillemin N, Bonnet M, Jurie C, Picard B. Functional analysis of beef tenderness. J Proteome. 2011;75(2):352–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rolf MM, Taylor JF, Schnabel RD, McKay SD, McClure MC, Northcutt SL, Kerley MS, Weaber RL. Genome-wide association analysis for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. Anim Genet. 2012;43(4):367–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawaguchi F, Kigoshi H, Fukushima M, Iwamoto E, Kobayashi E, Oyama K, Mannen H. Whole-genome resequencing to identify candidate genes for the QTL for oleic acid percentage in Japanese Black cattle. Anim Sci J. 2019;90(4):467–72.

  24. Söker T, Dalke C, Puk O, Floss T, Becker L, Bolle I, Favor J, Hans W, Hölter SM, Horsch M, et al. Pleiotropic effects in Eya3 knockout mice. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiando SR, Tucker NR, Castro-Vega LJ, Katz A, D'Escamard V, Tréard C, Fraher D, Albuisson J, Kadian-Dodov D, Ye Z, et al. PHACTR1 is a genetic susceptibility locus for fibromuscular dysplasia supporting its complex genetic pattern of inheritance. 2016;12(10):e1006367.

  26. Abo-Ismail MK, Lansink N, Akanno E, Karisa BK, Crowley JJ, Moore SS, Bork E, Stothard P, Basarab JA, Plastow GS. Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(2):375–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fortes MR, Snelling WM, Reverter A, Nagaraj SH, Lehnert SA, Hawken RJ, DeAtley KL, Peters SO, Silver GA, Rincon G, et al. Gene network analyses of first service conception in Brangus heifers: use of genome and trait associations, hypothalamic-transcriptome information, and transcription factors. J Anim Sci. 2012;90(9):2894–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hering DM, Olenski K, Kaminski S. Genome-wide association study for poor sperm motility in Holstein-Friesian bulls. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;146(3–4):89–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Comte D, Karampetsou MP, Humbel M, Tsokos GC. Signaling lymphocyte activation molecule family in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol (Orlando, Fla). 2019;204:57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Daoud H, Tetreault M, Gibson W, Guerrero K, Cohen A, Gburek-Augustat J, Synofzik M, Brais B, Stevens C, Sanchez-Carpintero R, et al. Mutations in POLR3A and POLR3B are a major cause of hypomyelinating leukodystrophies with or without dental abnormalities and/or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Med Genet. 2013;50(3):194–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cullis D, Philip B, Baleja J, Feig L. Rab11-FIP2, an adaptor protein connecting cellular components involved in internalization and recycling of epidermal growth factor receptors. J Biol Chem. 2003;277:49158–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang X, Ma D, Caruso M, Lewis M, Qi Y, Yi Z. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals novel phosphorylation events in insulin signaling regulated by protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12A. J Proteome. 2014;109:63–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun WX, Wang HH, Jiang BC, Zhao YY, Xie ZR, Xiong K, Chen J. Global comparison of gene expression between subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissue of mature Erhualian pig. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(4):5085–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JW, Choi BH, Lee SH, Lee SS, Kim HC, Yu D, Chung WH, Lee KT, Chai HH, Cho YM, et al. Whole-genome resequencing analysis of Hanwoo and Yanbian cattle to identify genome-wide SNPs and signatures of selection. Mol Cells. 2015;38(5):466–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cánovas A, Quintanilla R, Amills M, Pena RN. Muscle transcriptomic profiles in pigs with divergent phenotypes for fatness traits. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lu Y, Chen SR, Liu WB, Hou ZC, Xu GY, Yang N. Polymorphisms in Wnt signaling pathway genes are significantly associated with chicken carcass traits. Poult Sci. 2012;91(6):1299–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Clark IB, Boyd J, Hamilton G, Finnegan DJ, Jarman AP. D-six4 plays a key role in patterning cell identities deriving from the Drosophila mesoderm. Dev Biol. 2006;294(1):220–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li X, Oghi KA, Zhang J, Krones A, Bush KT, Glass CK, Nigam SK, Aggarwal AK, Maas R, Rose DW, et al. Eya protein phosphatase activity regulates Six1-Dach-Eya transcriptional effects in mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2003;426(6964):247–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Deng B, Parthasarathy S, Wang W, Gibney BR, Battaile KP, Lovell S, Benson DR, Zhu H. Study of the individual cytochrome b5 and cytochrome b5 reductase domains of Ncb5or reveals a unique heme pocket and a possible role of the CS domain. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(39):30181–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Larade K, Jiang Z, Zhang Y, Wang W, Bonner-Weir S, Zhu H, Bunn HF. Loss of Ncb5or results in impaired fatty acid desaturation, lipoatrophy, and diabetes. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(43):29285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Moore SS. Whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism associations with feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010;88(1):16–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van Driel BJ, Liao G, Engel P, Terhorst C. Responses to microbial challenges by SLAMF receptors. Front Immunol. 2016;7:4–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Reid GA. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Trends Biotechnol. 1991;9(1):213–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and Eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(12):e190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Alexander DH, Lange K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2011;27(15):2156–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang C, Dong S-S, Xu J-Y, He W-M, Yang T-L. PopLDdecay: a fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files. Bioinformatics. 2018;35(10):1786–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, Bustamante C. Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res. 2005;15(11):1566–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. DeGiorgio M, Huber CD, Hubisz MJ, Hellmann I, Nielsen R. SweepFinder2: increased sensitivity, robustness and flexibility. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(12):1895–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Szpiech ZA, Hernandez RD. Selscan: an efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(10):2824–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Xie C, Mao X, Huang J, Ding Y, Wu J, Dong S, Kong L, Gao G, Li C-Y, Wei L. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Web Server issue):W316–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Yu Jiang for his technical support.

Funding

This work was supported by Henan Beef Cattle Industrial Technology System (No. S2013–08), Special Program for Self-Innovation of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. 2019ZC41) and Science-Technology Foundation for innovation and creativity of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2020CX09) for the sample collection and sequencing. Also, it was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872317) and Program of National Beef Cattle and Yak Industrial Technology system (Grant No. CARS-37) for the data analysis, interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, No. 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Xiaoting Xia, Shunjin Zhang, Ningbo Chen, Peng Yang, Jiawei Xu, Xiaoting Ding, Chuzhao Lei, Hong Chen & Yongzhen Huang

  2. Pingdingshan animal husbandry technology promotion station, Pingdingshan, 467000, Henan, China

    Huaju Zhang, Zhigang Li & Hongxia Sun

  3. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, Henan, China

    Zijing Zhang, Shijie Lyu, Qiaoting Shi & Eryao Wang

  4. Henan Provincial Animal Husbandry General Station, Zhengzhou, 450008, Henan, China

    Xian Liu, Xianwei Wang, Zhiming Li, Baorui Ru & Zejun Xu

Authors
  1. Xiaoting Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shunjin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huaju Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zijing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ningbo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhigang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongxia Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shijie Lyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xianwei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhiming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Peng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jiawei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xiaoting Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Qiaoting Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Eryao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Baorui Ru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Zejun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Chuzhao Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Hong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Yongzhen Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH and XX conceived and designed the experiments. XX and SZ performed the statistical analysis. SZ, PY, JX, and XD performed the sample DNA extraction and data upload. NC provided technical assistance. HZ, ZZ, ZL, XL, SL, XW, ZML, QS, EW, BR and ZX contributed to the sample collections. HC, CL and YH provided the laboratories for DNA extraction and statistical analysis. XX drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongzhen Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwest A&F University following the recommendation of the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals of China. Permission for blood sampling was obtained from the Jiaxian Red Cattle Breeding Center on site.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Venn diagram showing overlapping and unique SNPs between the different cattle breeds or groups. The numbers in the circle components show specific SNPs for each breed or overlapping SNPs among breeds or groups. (a) The unique and shared SNPs between Jiaxian and “core” cattle groups, (b) The unique and shared SNPs between Jiaxian and Qinchuan cattle.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Gene ontology (GO) terms enriched in 617 genes containing specific nsSNPs of Jiaxian Red cattle (compared to Qinchuan cattle). Advanced bubble chart shows enrichment of differentially expressed genes in signaling pathways. Size and color of the bubble represent amount of differentially expressed genes enriched in pathway and enrichment significance, respectively.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Gene ontology (GO) terms enriched in 88 genes containing specific nsSNPs of Qinchuan cattle (compared to Jiaxian Red cattle). Advanced bubble chart shows enrichment of differentially expressed genes in signaling pathways. Size and color of the bubble represent amount of differentially expressed genes enriched in pathway and enrichment significance, respectively.

Additional file 4: Table S1.

Summary of sequencing data. Table S2. List of additional cattle samples for analysis of genetic background in Jiaxian Red cattle. Table S3. Distribution of SNPs identified in cattle breeds within various genomic regions annotated by ANNOVAR. Table S4. GO enrichment results for the genes containing specific nsSNPs > 5 in Jiaxian Red cattle. Table S5. GO enrichment results for the genes containing specific nsSNPs > 5 in Qinchuan cattle. Table S6. A summary of genes from θπ in Jiaxian Red. Table S7. A summary of genes from CLR in Jiaxian Red. Table S8. KEGG pathway analysis of Jiaxian Red candidate genes overlapped by θπ and CLR methods. Table S9. GO enrichment of Jiaxian Red candidate genes overlapped by θπ and CLR methods. Table S10. A summary of genes from FST. Table S11. A summary of genes from XP-CLR in Jiaxian Red cattle. Table S12. A summary of genes from FST and XP-EHH in Jiaxian Red cattle. Table S13. Cross-validation (CV) errors for ADMIXTURE ancestry models with K ranging from 2 to 8.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, H. et al. Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Jiaxian Red cattle using whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Genomics 22, 43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07340-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07340-0

Keywords

  • Chinese cattle
  • Genetic diversity
  • Population structure
  • Genetic signatures
  • Bos taurus
  • Bos indicus

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us