- Correction
- Open Access
- Published:
Correction to: Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2- corrected 16S rDNA sequences
BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 105 (2020)
Correction to: BMC Genomics (2020) 21:56
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6427-1
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors reported errors in Figs. 1, 2 and 5. Due to a typesetting error the asterisks denoting significance were missing from the published figures.
Piphillin results comparing 16S rRNA sequence analysis approaches using the KEGG database. a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences passing the identity threshold to the reference genomes. Percentage of amplicon sequences from two datasets using two different 16S rRNA sequence analysis approaches passing identity cutoffs from 75 to 100% against 16S rRNA gene sequences in the KEGG genome database. b Spearman’s correlation coefficient between Piphillin results and shotgun metagenomics at ten different identity cutoffs tested in Piphillin. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated for each sample and mean, 1st and 3rd quartiles are depicted by the boxes. Whiskers extend to the furthest points within 150% of the interquartile range. c Balanced accuracy in identifying differentially abundant KOs from Piphillin against corresponding metagenomics at each identity cutoff. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.001, *** indicates p < 0.0001
Piphillin results comparing 16S rRNA sequence analysis approaches using the BioCyc database. a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences passing the identity threshold to the reference genomes. Percentage of amplicon sequences from two datasets using two different 16S rRNA sequence analysis approaches passing identity cutoffs from 75 to 100% against 16S rRNA gene sequences in the BioCyc genome database. b Spearman’s correlation coefficient between Piphillin results and shotgun metagenomics at ten different identity cutoffs tested in Piphillin. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated for each sample and mean, 1st and 3rd quartiles are depicted by the boxes. Whiskers extend to the furthest points within 150% of the interquartile range. c Balanced accuracy in identifying differentially abundant features from Piphillin against corresponding metagenomics at each identity cutoff. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.001, *** indicates p < 0.0001
Piphillin executed with BioCyc vs KEGG reference on environmental samples. Spearman’s correlation coefficient against corresponding shotgun metagenomics results were compared the hypersaline microbial mat dataset using either KEGG and BioCyc references. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated for each sample and ranges are depicted as box and whisker plots as described in Fig. 1. * indicates p < 0.05, ** indicates p < 0.001, *** indicates p < 0.0001
The correct figures are reproduced in this Correction article, and the original article has been corrected.
Reference
Narayan, et al. Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2- corrected 16S rDNA sequences. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6427-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Narayan, N.R., Weinmaier, T., Laserna-Mendieta, E.J. et al. Correction to: Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2- corrected 16S rDNA sequences. BMC Genomics 21, 105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6537-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6537-9