Skip to main content
Download PDF

A comprehensive microsatellite landscape of human Y-DNA at kilobase resolution

BMC Genomics volume 22, Article number: 76 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Though interest in human simple sequence repeats (SSRs) is increasing, little is known about the exact distributional features of numerous SSRs in human Y-DNA at chromosomal level. Herein, totally 540 maps were established, which could clearly display SSR landscape in every bin of 1 k base pairs (Kbp) along the sequenced part of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10), by our developed differential method for improving the existing method to reveal SSR distributional characteristics in large genomic sequences.

Results

The maps show that SSRs accumulate significantly with forming density peaks in at least 2040 bins of 1 Kbp, which involve different coding, noncoding and intergenic regions of the Y-DNA, and 10 especially high density peaks were reported to associate with biological significances, suggesting that the other hundreds of especially high density peaks might also be biologically significant and worth further analyzing. In contrast, the maps also show that SSRs are extremely sparse in at least 207 bins of 1 Kbp, including many noncoding and intergenic regions of the Y-DNA, which is inconsistent with the widely accepted view that SSRs are mostly rich in these regions, and these sparse distributions are possibly due to powerfully regional selection. Additionally, many regions harbor SSR clusters with same or similar motif in the Y-DNA.

Conclusions

These 540 maps may provide the important information of clearly position-related SSR distributional features along the human reference Y-DNA for better understanding the genome structures of the Y-DNA. This study may contribute to further exploring the biological significance and distribution law of the huge numbers of SSRs in human Y-DNA.

Background

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs/microsatellites) are ubiquitous in eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and also viral genomes with repeat-units of 1–6 bp/nt [1,2,3,4,5]. SSRs have been reported to nonrandomly occur in genomes and associate with different biological significances, which have been gradually recognized as important elements [2, 6, 7]. They have been discovered in both coding and noncoding regions with important roles in modifying morphological features [8], regulating gene expression [9], protecting sequence structures [7], acting as essential boundaries [10], modulating RNA structure and function [11], creating available variants to survive in the host [12] and contributing to genomic evolution [13]. Lots of medical studies have revealed abnormal SSRs in different genomic positions related with more than 40 genetic diseases like fragile X syndrome, Huntington’s disease, Friedreich’s ataxia and spinocerebellar ataxias type 8, or in many cancers like colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, gastrointestinal cancer and breast cancer [14,15,16].

SSRs have been reported to constitute ~ 12% of Japanese pufferfish genome, 15% of rabbit genome, 10% of primate genome and so on [17]; and it has been estimated that SSRs represent over 1 million sites covering 3% of human genome [1, 4]. Though numerous studies and interests were paid to the SSRs in human genome in past decades [1, 4, 15, 17], the clarified SSRs still involve only very few human genomic positions [2]. Rough SSR distributional features have been investigated in human genome [18, 19], and the Genome Browser also provides chance for surveying part of the elementary position of relatively longer SSRs in full human genome [20].

Human chromosome Y is unique with sex-determining genomic compositions and unusual evolutionary history [21, 22]. Human X and Y chromosomes originated from ordinary autosomes beginning at millions of years ago, and the Y chromosome specifically evolved with frequent gene decay and a lack of recombination, making it strikingly different from the X chromosome in size, structure and gene content [23, 24]. Owing to the gene decay and lacking recombination, Y chromosome formed a male-specific region (MSY) that comprise 95% of its length, and this region is flanked on both sides by pseudoautomosomal region (PAR), which can process mitotic recombination with chromosome X. Though human Y chromosome harbors a few genes, it is rich in repetitive and ampliconic elements, including SSRs [23,24,25]. The mutation rates of many SSRs are significantly high in this chromosome; Willems et al. predicted that the load of de novo SSR mutations is at least 75 mutations per generation in human Y chromosome [26] and Ballantyne et al. estimated that the mutation rates are from 3.78 × 10− 4 to 7.44 × 10− 2 per Y SSR marker they selected per generation [27]. And researches always prefer to work on these highly polymorphic SSRs in human Y-DNA, like DYS19 or called DYS394, whose sequence is (TAGA)3(TAGG)(TAGA)7–15 in Yp11.1 and mutation rate is 2.5 × 10− 4, as they can be widely applied in forensic investigation, paternity test, population study and evolutionary research [26, 28,29,30,31,32,33]. The investigations of SSR distributional features are limited to these several highly polymorphic sites, so it is necessary to reveal the exact distributional features of many thousands of SSRs in human Y-DNA at chromosomal level.

Here, we developed a differential calculating method for further exploring the exact distributional features of the SSRs with human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10). Hundreds of maps were established to clearly show SSR landscape in every 1 kilobase (Kbp) genomic region of human reference Y-DNA. These SSR landscapes revealed significant regional variation of SSR distributional features in this Y-DNA at the differential resolution of 1 Kbp. This study may provide an important guide for further exploring biological significance and distributional laws of numerous SSRs in human Y-DNA.

Results

The exact distributional features of the SSRs were investigated in the reference sequence of human Y-DNA (NC_000024.10), and this well reviewed Y-DNA is still incompletely sequenced with 55 sequenced segments and 56 gaps (Fig. 1a and Table S1). The sizes of 55 sequenced segments are in range of 1604 ~ 8,533,670 bp, which can be grouped into large (≥100 Kbp) and small (< 100 Kbp) size segments; the large sequenced segments are totally 25,805,216 bp representing about 97.65% of the sequenced part of the reference Y-DNA, and the other 45 small segments represent only 2.35% of the sequenced part (Fig. 1b and Table S1). The total number and size of SSRs are 190,048 and 1,528,466 in this reference Y-DNA under the threshold of 6, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 (Fig. 1c); and the threshold was widely applied to analyze SSRs in many reported studies [34, 35], which could extract much more SSRs than those in The UCSC (University of California, Santa Cruz) Genome Browser, where the total number of SSRs is only 4376 due to excluding the SSRs shorter than 25 bp by the default settings [20, 36].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The densities of identified SSRs in the sequenced segments of reported human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10). a The diagram of 55 sequenced segments in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10). b The comparison of sequenced segments and small segments. c The comparative statistics of identified SSRs in the study and in UCSC Genome Browser. d The relative densities (RDs) of SSRs in 55 sequenced segments in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10). e The map of SSR position-related D50-relative density at the position of 21,805,282–26,673,214 bp in human reference Y-DNA at resolution of 50 Kbp

Full size image

The SSR distributions were widely studied with the statistics of relative density (RD) [18, 34, 37]. The average relative density of the SSRs is 57.86 in the total 55 sequenced segments, but the relative density is very different in every sequenced segment. The relative densities of SSRs vary a little from 46.41 to 91.80 with a standard deviation (SD) equaling to 6.28 in the 10 large segments; and that vary a lot from 23.75 to 250.96 with standard deviations more than 62.65 in the 45 small segments, the standard deviation of SSR relative densities was showed to increase obviously as the sizes of investigated segments decreasing (Fig. 1d). These data suggested that the result of SSR relative density is seriously influenced by the statistical segment size; it may not correctly reveal the true features of SSR distributions in these large segments, and the big size may have masked the true distribution features of SSRs in those large segments. As the small segments were showed a great SSR relative density variation and separately located in different parts of the human Y-DNA, the SSR relative density variation may be significantly related to the genome position. These analyses indicate that such relative density method is possibly very limited for analysis of SSRs in big sequence like human genome, and it is necessary to develop new approaches for investigating the exact distribution feature of SSRs in large genomic sequence.

To explore the exact features of SSR distributions in the large segment sequences, we developed a Differential Calculator of Microsatellites Version 2 (DCM V2) method, which can calculate SSR densities by dividing the large segments into many differential units, and the alteration of differential unit size may give different resolutions to reveal the feature of SSR distribution; herein, the differential unit size (Dn) was used as the resolutions of 100, 50, 10, 5, 2 and 1 Kbp in 10 large segments. So a SSR position-related Dn-relative density (pDnRD) concept was introduced in this method. The differential resolutions more than 50 Kbp revealed that the SSR pDnRD only vary a little around the average relative density value in the sequenced regions of the Y-DNA (Fig. 1e and Fig. S2). As the differential resolution size decreasing, the pDnRD variation level usually increases in the large segments (Fig. S3), and the 1 Kbp resolution can reveal a clearest pD1RD variation feature in these large segments of the reference Y-DNA (Fig. 2; Fig. S1.1-S1.540).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A typical map of SSR position-related D1-relative density (pD1RD) in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) at resolution of 1 Kbp

Full size image

The SSRs landscape at 1 Kbp resolution

We obtained 540 maps of SSR position-related relative densities in the reference sequence of human Y-DNA by investigation at 1 Kbp differential resolution, and each map usually contains 51 bins of 1 Kbp with overlapping 1 bin to bilateral maps (Figs. S1.1-S1.540). These maps show an exact landscape of SSR distribution with significant variation of position D1-relative SSR densities at different genomic positions as described in Figs. 2 and 3. The SSRs were observed to accumulate in 2040 differential bins of 1 Kbp genomic region forming mountain peak like SSR density peaks with pD1RD much higher than the average relative density in sequenced part of human reference Y-DNA; the SSR density peaks can be divided into 4 levels including 36 super high density peaks (sHP, pD1RD ≥ 425.00), 76 high density peaks (HP, 300.00 ≤ pD1RD < 425.00), 528 middle density peaks (MP, 150.00 ≤ pD1RD < 300.00) and 1400 low density peaks (LP, 90.00 ≤ pD1RD < 150.00) (Fig. 4 and Figs. S1.1–1.540). On the contrary, SSRs appear with extremely low densities in some genomic regions, and these regions can be grouped into 3 kinds including 2 big SSR extremely low density regions (bELR, RD < 25.00, size ≥100 Kbp), 137 small SSR extremely low density regions (sELR, RD < 25.00, 3 Kbp ≤ size < 100 Kbp) and 69 SSR desert regions (ZD, pD1RD = 0, size ≤2 Kbp) (Fig. 4 and Figs. S1.1-S1.540). Therefore, the 51 bins usually have different pD1RD making each map mixed with different SSR density peaks and extremely low density region, and the 540 maps can be typically classified into 6 types: 74 HML type maps with mix of high, middle and low density peaks, 202 ML type maps with mix of middle and low peaks, 212 L type maps with only low peaks, 16 Penta type maps with domination of pentanucleotide SSRs, 31 AV type maps with all pD1RD close to the genomic average relative density, and 5 EL type maps with all pD1RD very lower than average (Fig. 3 and Figs. S1.1-S1.540).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The six types of SSR pD1RD distribution maps in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) at resolution of 1 Kbp

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The statistics of different feature types of SSR pD1RD distributions in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) at resolution of 1 Kbp. a The statistics of identified different SSR density peak types, SSR extremely low density regions (ELR) types and SSR pD1RD distribution map types. b The two identified big SSR extremely low density region. c The statistics of different identified SSR density peak types and ELR region types in the intergenic regions and genes. d The possibly biological significance of SSR high density peaks (36 sHP and 76 HP), and details were listed in Table S4

Full size image

Clusters of microsatellites

It was also found that there are large numbers of SSRs with same or similar motif which neighborly locate together without other SSR motif in many regions of this human reference Y-DNA (Table S2). Some of these regions even harbor hundreds of such kind of same or similar SSR motifs, for example, there are 430 (CT/TC)6 without other SSR motif at the region of 95,647–133,828 bp of the Y-DNA (Fig. 5A.1); and some harbor dozens of or more than 3 same or similar SSR motifs, like 15 (AT/TA)n at the region of 7,426,653–7,426,857 bp (Fig. 5A.2) and 5 (AAAG/AAGA/AGAA/GAAA)n at the region of 56,858,319–56,858,540 bp of the Y-DNA (Fig. 5A.3). The regions of these specific SSR distributions can be defined as SSR clusters in this study; there are totally 8109 identified SSR clusters in sequenced part of the Y-DNA, which can be grouped into 3 levels including 203 big clusters (Clu, clustered same (similar) SSR number ≥ 26), 355 mini-clusters (MClu, 9 ≤ clustered same (similar) SSR number < 26) and 7551 micro-clusters (mClu, 3 ≤ clustered same SSR number < 9) (Fig. 5b and Table S3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The clusters of many SSRs with same or similar motif in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10). (A.1-A.3) The typical 3 levels of SSR clusters including SSR big clusters, mini-clusters and micro-clusters. (B) The statistics of different identified SSR cluster types in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10)

Full size image

Discussion

Our comprehensive survey of microsatellite distributions at 1 Kbp differential resolution to gain an exact landscape in the human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10), and 540 SSR landscape maps were obtained; these maps show that SSRs are accumulated significantly in some small regions and also seriously sparse in some regions; and many same or similar motif SSRs were observed to locate neighborly forming SSR clusters. Large numbers of SSRs in human Y-DNA have been previously understudied because the related studies usually focus on some significant Y SSR markers, or only analyzed the average distributions in the coding, noncoding and intergenic regions [7, 18, 19, 25, 28, 29, 38]. And UCSC Genome Browser might be not specific to highlight microsatellite distributional variation in every genomic position [20] (Fig. S4). The 540 SSR landscape maps in this study can provide a comprehensive view of clear SSR distributional features in every 1 Kbp genomic region along the human reference Y-DNA, and these maps can detailedly highlight the significant variations of position-related microsatellite distributions in this Y-DNA. And our studies may be helpful to reveal the microsatellite distributional laws and to further explore the biological significance of SSRs in the human reference Y-DNA.

Our observation of significant SSR accumulations to form density peaks indicates an obviously statistic bias of SSR distributions in the human reference Y-DNA, and such accumulations were also observed in other human and mammal Y-DNA (Figs. S5 and S6), suggesting that these SSR accumulations with forming high density peaks were possibly selected for being related to some biological significances. There are 112 identified high density peaks including 36 super high peaks and 76 high peaks in this study, implicating that the highly significant SSR accumulating regions totally represent 0.4% (112 Kbp / 26,415 Kbp) of the whole sequenced regions of the human reference Y-DNA, which are worth focusing on. And 10 of these 112 peaks have been already reported to possibly be related with known biological significance (Fig. 4d) [10, 19, 20, 39,40,41], for example, S4-HP10 is in a reported recombination hotspot in the p-arm pseudoautosomal region (p-PAR) of the Y-DNA, which might contribute to the mitotic recombination (Fig. 2 and 4d, Table S4) [40]; S55-sHP1 is in the telomeric region at the q-arm of the Y-DNA, which might be the boundary between telomere and euchromatic region [7, 19] (Fig. 4d). Though the biological significances of the other 102 peaks are not reported as many SSRs being lacking of understanding in human Y-DNA originally, these peaks may also play some important biological roles potentially, which probably deserve to be further explored [6, 10, 42,43,44,45]. In addition, those middle and low peaks possibly be also helpful to some biological process. Therefore, our fine maps of SSR landscape may provide the guide for mining the biological significance of such significant SSR accumulations with high densities in the human reference Y-DNA.

SSRs are widely considered to be more in noncoding and intergenic regions than coding regions [1,2,3, 6]. However, it is inconsistent with the wide consideration that the SSRs were detected to occur with extremely low densities in 2 big intergenic regions and many small noncoding and intergenic regions of the human reference Y-DNA, moreover, the SSRs were even not discovered in dozens of noncoding and intergenic regions of this Y-DNA, which have never been reported before to our knowledge (Figs. 3, 4B and C, Table S5). These events indicate the SSRs occurring in these regions might be not well tolerated and be exposed to strong negative selection as the commonly accepted view illustrating that many SSRs have evolved under serious selective constraints in genomes [1, 13, 46]. Our SSR landscape maps showed significantly regional variation of SSR densities in human reference Y-DNA, and it may be worthwhile to deeply explore the relationship between the selection and the significantly regional variation of SSR densities. Thus, our studies could significantly augment the knowledge of SSR landscapes in every different coding, noncoding and intergenic region of human Y-DNA, and also may contribute to the study of SSR evolution in human Y-DNA.

Besides clearly showing SSR landscapes, this study also revealed that many SSRs with same or similar motif are located neighborly to form over 8000 different sizes of SSR clusters in the sequenced regions of human reference Y-DNA. Many SSR clusters were detected to distribute numbers of SSRs with same motif and small neighboring SSR distances, contributing to forming the SSR density peaks, and some SSR clusters even distribute hundreds of identical SSRs with regular neighboring SSR distances (Tables S2 and S3). SSRs were reported to likely have evolved from an initial expansion of a short existing sequence motif and to be the quickly expandable compositions in genomes [5, 13, 17, 46]; so, the SSR clusters can be also assumed to have evolved from the expansions of an existing SSR motif, and it may be valuable for further studying their evolutionary process in human Y-DNA.

Conclusions

SSRs are commonly thought to be not just the simple sequences randomly distributed in genomes. The distributional laws of SSRs in human Y-DNA still remain to be further studied, but we hope that this study with 540 exact SSR landscape maps in human reference Y-DNA will help to elucidate the genetic and evolutionary mechanism involved, and our DCM 2.0 method can contribute to clarifying the SSR landscapes in other genomic sequences.

Methods

Genomic sequence selection

We selected the reported reference genomic sequence of human chromosome Y (NC_000024.10), which is the published human Y-DNA with the highest sequencing completion (yet unfinished) and most convincing accuracy. The non-sequenced compositions (gaps) separated this reference Y-DNA into 55 different sequenced segments, which can be grouped into large (≥100 Kbp) and small (< 100 Kbp) size segments (Table S1).

SSR identification

IMEx, a program with friendly interface, was utilized to identify perfect SSRs in this analysis [47]. The lowest copy number of repeat units, which is the threshold to identify the SSRs, was 6, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 for extracting mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide SSRs respectively according to empirical criterion and previous SSR studies [34, 35]. Some other programs like Tandem Repeat Finder and RepeatMasker, which usually exclude many short SSRs (with default parameters, SSRs shorter than 25 bp are filtered out), were mainly applied as the reference tools here [36, 48].

Method for fine maps of SSR landscapes in large genomic sequence

The former statistics of SSR relative density (RD) was usually calculated by the total SSR size dividing the total size of the sample genomic sequence [35, 49, 50], which could be described as the following formula:

$$ {\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{n}}={\mathrm{n}}_1={\mathrm{n}}_2={\mathrm{n}}_3=\dots ={\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{i}}=\dots ={\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{la}} $$
(1)

In this formula (1), M is the total size of SSRs (microsatellites) in the sample genomic sequence; N is the size of the sample genomic sequence. This method can only illustrate the global average value of SSR distributions in the sample genomic sequences, and the size of sample genomic sequence is usually very large, so this average value is actually not able to represent exact features of the SSR distributions in corresponding sequence.

We developed the Differential Calculator of Microsatellites Version 2.0 (DCM v2.0) method in the basis of DCM v1.0 [51] to calculate SSR relative density in every region along the large genomic sequence, which is aimed to reveal fine SSR landscapes in the genomic sequences. Firstly, DCM v2.0 can partition the large genomic sequence (N) into numerous differential units, which can be described as:

$$ \mathrm{N}=\sum {\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{i}} $$
(2)
$$ {\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{n}}={\mathrm{n}}_1={\mathrm{n}}_2={\mathrm{n}}_3=\dots ={\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{i}}=\dots ={\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{la}} $$
(3)

In these 2 formulas, ni is the size of the i-th differential bin (i = 1, 2, 3, … i, i + 1, … la; la = the last) in large genomic sequence; la is equal to rounding (N/Dn) to up integer; Dn represents the resolution of differential unit size (Kbp), e.g., D50 means the differential resolution of 50 Kbp.

The differential resolution size (Dn) critically affects the exactness of revealing SSR landscapes as well as the pixels affect the image quality, and la is negative proportional to Dn. The large genomic sequence is like a large differential resolution size with la =1, which is not proper mentioned above, so it is necessary to process an investigation to adjust into the best size for revealing fine SSR landscapes.

Then DCM 2.0 can calculate the SSR relative density in each differential unit respectively, equaling to partitioning the total SSR size (M) into local SSR sizes in numerous differential units of the large genomic sequence, expressed as the following formula:

$$ \mathrm{M}=\sum {\mathrm{m}}_{\mathrm{i}} $$
(4)

In this formula (4), mi is the size of SSRs in the i-th differential bin; it is also critically affected by the differential resolution size (Dn).

Each differential unit represents a small region of the large genomic sequence, so a concept of SSR position-related Dn-relative density (pDnRD) was introduced in this method, which reflects SSR distributional features are critically influenced by both position (the i-th differential bin) and differential resolution size (Dn), and it can be expressed as:

$$ {\mathrm{pD}}_{\mathrm{n}}{\mathrm{RD}}_{\mathrm{i}}=\frac{{\mathrm{m}}_{\mathrm{i}}}{{\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{n}}}\times 100 $$
(5)

pDnRDi is the pDnRD in the i-th differential bin at the large genomic sequence. And the standard deviation (SD) of pDnRD was used to test the exactness of SSR distributional features at the corresponding differential resolution size.

Visualization for exact SSR landscapes

Ggplot2, a R package, was utilized to visualize the SSR pDnRD distributions in the reference human Y-DNA into the Figures. Among the maps of SSR pDnRD distribution at 1 Kbp resolution (pD1RD), a normal size map represents a zone including 51 differential units of 1 Kbp with overlapping 1 unit to bilateral maps, and each zone was labeled into a zone serial number, e.g., S4-Z003 represents the third zone in S4. Owing to the gaps in this Y-DNA, some zones are in unnormal size, including those of the starts and ends of large sequenced segments, and those of short sequenced segments (labeled into only segment name, e.g., S13); the much short sequenced segments (size < 10 Kbp) were all integrated into the same map. The reported protein coding genes and ncRNA genes were also marked in these maps according to the annotation of NC_000024.10.

Availability of data and materials

The accession number of the reference human Y-DNA used in this analysis is NC_000024.10. The annotation and information of protein-coding and ncRNA genes were collected from the Genbank file of NC_000024.10 and the corresponding name is Homo sapiens Updated Annotation Release 109.20201120 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Homo_sapiens/109.20201120/). The annotations of the regulatory regions and specific genomic structures were collected from Genome Browser at University of California, Santa Cruz (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) and Ensemble Genome Browser (www.ensemble.org).

The accession number of samples (alignment file) from 1000 human genome project (https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1000genomes/ftp/1000G_2504_high_coverage/data/) are NA07051 (https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1000genomes/ftp/1000G_2504_high_coverage/data/ERR3239281/) and NA18874 (https://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1000genomes/ftp/1000G_2504_high_coverage/data/ERR3243161/).

The accession number of the Y-DNA of chimpanzee, rhesus monkey, mouse and rat used in this analysis is NC_006492.4 (annotation: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Pan_troglodytes/105/), NC_027914.1 (annotation: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Macaca_mulatta/103/), NC_000087.8 (annotation: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Mus_musculus/109/) and NC_024475.1 (annotation: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_euk/Rattus_norvegicus/106/).

Tables S1-S5 are available in https://github.com/DooYal/human-Y-supplementary-material/tree/master/Supplementary%20tables

Figs. S1.1-S1.540 are available in https://dooyal.github.io/human_y_ssr_maps/

DCM 2.0 is available in https://github.com/DooYal/DCM

Abbreviations

SSR:

Simple sequence repeat

MSY:

Male-specific region in Y

PAR:

Pesudoautomosomal region

Kbp:

kilobase

UCSC:

University of California, Santa Cruz

RD:

Relative density

SD:

Standard deviation

Dn :

Differential unit size

pDnRD:

Position-related Dn-relative density

DCM V2:

Differential Calculator of Microsatellites Version 2

sHP:

Super high peak

HP:

High peak

MP:

Middle peak

LP:

Low peak

bELR:

Big extremely low (density) region

sELR:

Small extremely low (density) region

ZD:

Zero (density) desert

Clu:

Big-cluster

MClu:

Mini-cluster

mClu:

Micro-cluster

References

  1. Hannan AJ. Tandem repeats mediating genetic plasticity in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(5):286–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gymrek M, Willems T, Reich D, Erlich Y. Interpreting short tandem repeat variations in humans using mutational constraint. Nat Genet. 2017;49(10):1495–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gymrek M, Willems T, Guilmatre A, Zeng H, Markus B, Georgiev S, et al. Abundant contribution of short tandem repeats to gene expression variation in humans. Nat Genet. 2016;48(1):22–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirkin SM. Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature. 2007;447(7147):932–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(6):435–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinces MD, Legendre M, Caldara M, Hagihara M, Verstrepen KJ. Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability. Science. 2009;324(5931):1213–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001;409(6822):860–921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fondon JW, Garner HR. Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(52):18058–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yap K, Mukhina S, Zhang G, Tan JSC, Ong HS, Makeyev EV. A short tandem repeat-enriched RNA assembles a nuclear compartment to control alternative splicing and promote cell survival. Mol Cell. 2018;72(3):525–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar RP, Krishnan J, Pratap Singh N, Singh L, Mishra RK. GATA simple sequence repeats function as enhancer blocker boundaries. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1844.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos-Pereira JM, Aguilera A. R loops: new modulators of genome dynamics and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(10):583–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kita E, Katsui N, Emoto M, Sawaki M, Oku D, Nishikawa F, et al. Virulence of transparent and opaque colony types of Neisseria gonorrhoeae for the genital tract of mice. J Med Microbiol. 1991;34(6):355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willems T, Zielinski D, Yuan J, Gordon A, Gymrek M, Erlich Y. Genome-wide profiling of heritable and de novo STR variations. Nat Methods. 2017;14(6):590–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandal R, Samstein RM, Lee KW, Havel JJ, Wang H, Krishna C, et al. CANCER genetic diversity of tumors with mismatch repair deficiency influences anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response. Science. 2019;364(6439):485–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan EM, Shibue T, McFarland JM, Gaeta B, Ghandi M, Dumont N, et al. WRN helicase is a synthetic lethal target in microsatellite unstable cancers. Nature. 2019;568(7753):551–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bailey MH, Tokheim C, Porta-Pardo E, Sengupta S, Bertrand D, Weerasinghe A, et al. Comprehensive characterization of cancer driver genes and mutations. Cell. 2018;173(2):371–85 e318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21(6):991–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kofler R, Schlotterer C, Luschutzky E, Lelley T. Survey of microsatellite clustering in eight fully sequenced species sheds light on the origin of compound microsatellites. BMC Genomics. 2008;9.

  19. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium.  Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2004;431(7011):931–45.

  20. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12(6):996–1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bachtrog D. The temporal dynamics of processes underlying Y chromosome degeneration. Genetics. 2008;179(3):1513–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bachtrog D. Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(2):113–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes JF, Page DC. The biology and evolution of mammalian Y chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:507–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Otto SP, Pannell JR, Peichel CL, Ashman TL, Charlesworth D, Chippindale AK, et al. About PAR: the distinct evolutionary dynamics of the pseudoautosomal region. Trends Genet. 2011;27(9):358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, Brown LG, et al. The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature. 2003;423:825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Willems T, Gymrek M, Poznik GD, Tyler-Smith C, Erlich Y. Y GPC: population-scale sequencing data enable precise estimates of Y-STR mutation rates. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(5):919–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ballantyne KN, Goedbloed M, Fang R, Schaap O, Lao O, Wollstein A, et al. Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87(3):341–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kayser M, Kittler R, Erler A, Hedman M, Lee AC, Mohyuddin A, et al. A comprehensive survey of human Y-chromosomal microsatellites. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(6):1183–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kayser M. Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview. Hum Genet. 2017;136(5):621–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Claerhout S, Van der Haegen M, Vangeel L, Larmuseau MHD, Decorte R. A game of hide and seq: identification of parallel Y-STR evolution in deep-rooting pedigrees. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(4):637–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Sayres MAW, Jarve M, Talas UG, et al. A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015;25(4):459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun JX, Helgason A, Masson G, Ebenesersdottir SS, Li H, Mallick S, et al. A direct characterization of human mutation based on microsatellites. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1161–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Summary List of Y Chromosome STR Loci and Available Fact Sheets [https://strbase.nist.gov//ystr_fact.htm].

  34. Zhao XY, Tian YL, Yang RH, Feng HP, Ouyang QJ, Tian Y, et al. Coevolution between simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and virus genome size. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:435.

  35. Rajendrakumar P, Biswal AK, Balachandran SM, Srinivasarao K, Sundaram RM. Simple sequence repeats in organellar genomes of rice: frequency and distribution in genic and intergenic regions. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(1):1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(2):573–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, et al. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet. 2014;46(7):707–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Borstnik B, Pumpernik D. Tandem repeats in protein coding regions of primate genes. Genome Res. 2002;12(6):909–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zerbino DR, Johnson N, Juetteman T, Sheppard D, Wilder SP, Lavidas I, et al. Ensembl regulation resources. Database (Oxford). 2016;2016:bav119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. May CA, Shone AC, Kalaydjieva L, Sajantila A, Jeffreys AJ. Crossover clustering and rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium in the Xp/Yp pseudoautosomal gene SHOX. Nat Genet. 2002;31(3):272–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Allshire RC, Dempster M, Hastie ND. Human telomeres contain at least three types of G-rich repeat distributed non-randomly. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(12):4611–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Usdin K. The biological effects of simple tandem repeats: lessons from the repeat expansion diseases. Genome Res. 2008;18(7):1011–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Grunewald TGP, Bernard V, Gilardi-Hebenstreit P, Raynal V, Surdez D, Aynaud MM, et al. Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite. Nat Genet. 2015;47(9):1073–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun JH, Zhou LD, Emerson DJ, Phyo SA, Titus KR, Gong WF, et al. Disease-associated short tandem repeats co-localize with chromatin domain boundaries. Cell. 2018;175(1):224–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sinai MIT, Salamon A, Stanleigh N, Goldberg T, Weiss A, Wang YH, et al. AT-dinucleotide rich sequences drive fragile site formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(18):9685–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Duitama J, Zablotskaya A, Gemayel R, Jansen A, Belet S, Vermeesch JR, et al. Large-scale analysis of tandem repeat variability in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(9):5728–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mudunuri SB, Nagarajaram HA. IMEx: imperfect microsatellite extractor. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(10):1181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tempel S. Using and understanding RepeatMasker. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;859:29–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Luo MC, Gu YQ, Puiu D, Wang H, Twardziok SO, Deal KR, et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature. 2017;551(7681):498–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Teh BT, Lim K, Yong CH, Ng CCY, Rao SR, Rajasegaran V, et al. The draft genome of tropical fruit durian (Durio zibethinus). Nat Genet. 2017;49(11):1633–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li D, Jiao W, Zhou S, Fu Y, Peng S, Peng Y, et al. Comparative analysis on precise distribution-patterns of microsatellites in HIV-1 with differential statistical method. Gene Reports. 2018;12:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Qingyi Wang, Yi He, Shiyan Huang, Jinyi Liu, Kang Sun, Jie Wang and Xiangyu Yan for their help at drawing maps.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by funding from the “National Key Plan for Scientific Research and Development of China” (grant No. 2016YFC1200200 and 2016YFD0500300, Recipient: Zhongyang Tan).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Douyue Li, Saichao Pan and Hongxi Zhang are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioinformatics Center, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

    Douyue Li, Saichao Pan, Hongxi Zhang, Yongzhuo Fu, Zhuli Peng, Liang Zhang, Shan Peng, Hanrou Huang, Ruixue Shi, Heping Zheng, Yousong Peng & Zhongyang Tan

  2. Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada

    Fei Xu

Authors
  1. Douyue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saichao Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongxi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongzhuo Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhuli Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shan Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hanrou Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ruixue Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Heping Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yousong Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Zhongyang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZT designed and directed this study. DL and SP1 performed the analysis of SSR densities in the human reference Y-DNA. HZ1 performed the comparative analysis of SSR densities in the reference Y-DNA of chimpanzee, rhesus, mouse and rat. ZP and LZ performed the analysis of SSR clusters in the human reference Y-DNA. YF and SP1 developed DCM method and built the SSR landscape maps. FX and YP directed on mathematic calculation of the SSR densities. SP2, HH and RS marked the annotations of the genes, regulator regions and specific genomic structures on the SSR landscape maps of the human reference Y-DNA. HZ2 gave advice for the revised manuscript and language. ZT and DL prepared the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongyang Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The sequenced segments and SSR statistics of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10).

Additional file 2: Table S2

. The SSR clusters in the original statistics of SSR extraction in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10)(S1: 10001–44,821 bp).

Additional file 3: Table S3

. The features of identified SSR mini-clusters in 55 sequenced segments of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) (mini-cluster (MClu), 9 ≤ clustered same or similar SSR number < 26).

Additional file 4: Table S4

. The features of identified super high density peaks in 55 segments of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) at 1 Kbp resolution (super high peak (sHP), pD1RD ≥ 425.00).

Additional file 5: Table S5

. The statistics of identified different position related D1-relative density (pD1RD) map types in 55 sequenced segments of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10).

Additional file 6: Figure S1.

540 SSR position related  D1-relative density maps in human Y-DNA (NC_000024.10) at 1 kilobase resolution.

Additional file 7: Figure S2.

The SSR position related D50-relative density (pD50RD) map in 10 large segments of human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10).

Additional file 8: Figure S3.

The comparison of SSR position related Dn-relative density maps at differential resolutions of 100, 50, 10, 5, 2, 1 Kbp in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10).

Additional file 9: Figure S4.

The comparison of showing SSR distributional features in SSR pD1RD map and UCSC Genome Browser at the position of 1200001-1300000 bp in human reference Y-DNA (NC_000024.10).

Additional file 10: Figure S5.

The example of comparing high SSR accumulations between human reference Y-DNA and other human Y-DNA at the same locations.

Additional file 11: Figure S6.

The similar SSR accumulations of high densities located at the flanking region (about 15000 bp away) of SRY in human chimpanzee, rhesus monkey, mouse and rat reference Y.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Pan, S., Zhang, H. et al. A comprehensive microsatellite landscape of human Y-DNA at kilobase resolution. BMC Genomics 22, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07389-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07389-5

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us