Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of differentially expressed contigs between mantle tissue sections and annotation levels

From: Transcriptomic analysis of shell repair and biomineralization in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis

Comparison Differential expression Annotationb
Tissue in which genes are more highly expressed FDRa <=0.001 SwissProt Trembl SMP database
Undamaged valve: mantle edge vs. central mantle Mantle edge 8,955 2,293 4,001 220
Central mantle 7,221 3,128 3,780 23
Damaged valve: mantle edge vs. central mantle Mantle edge 7,340 2,039 3,484 155
Central mantle 6,229 2,614 3,144 28
Central mantle: Damaged vs. undamaged valve Damaged valve 653 131 236 54
Undamaged valve 0 0 0 0
Mantle edge: Damaged vs. undamaged valve Damaged valve 0 0 0 0
Undamaged valve 0 0 0 0
  1. aFDR False Discovery Rate
  2. bnumber of putative genes with annotation derived through sequence similarity searches of the stated databases