Skip to main content

De novo genome assembly and functional annotation for Fusarium langsethiae



Fusarium langsethiae is a T-2 and HT-2 mycotoxins producing species firstly characterised in 2004. It is commonly isolated from oats in Northern Europe. T-2 and HT-2 mycotoxins exhibit immunological and haemotological effects in animal health mainly through inhibition of protein, RNA and DNA synthesis. The development of a high-quality and comprehensively annotated assembly for this species is therefore essential in providing the molecular understanding and the mechanism of T-2 and HT-2 biosynthesis in F. langsethiae to help develop effective control strategies.


The F. langsethiae assembly was produced using PacBio long reads, which were then assembled independently using Canu, SMARTdenovo and Flye. A total of 19,336 coding genes were identified using RNA-Seq informed ab-initio gene prediction. Finally, predicting genes were annotated using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) against the NCBI non-redundant (NR) genome database and protein hits were annotated using InterProScan. Genes with blast hits were functionally annotated with Gene Ontology.


We developed a high-quality genome assembly of a total length of 59 Mb and N50 of 3.51 Mb. Raw sequence reads and assembled genome is publicly available and can be downloaded from: GenBank under the accession JAFFKB000000000.

All commands used to generate this assembly are accessible via GitHub:

Peer Review reports


Fusarium langsethiae is a fungus belonging to the family Nectriaceae. It commonly infects ripening oats without showing any visible symptoms especially in Northern Europe, and contaminates the grains with the type A trichothecenes, T-2 and HT-2 [1, 2]. These mycotoxins mainly inhibit proteins, RNA and DNA synthesis leading to immunological and haematological effects [3].

Originally, this species was considered to be a “powdery F. poae”. However, subsequently it was shown to be a separate species and classified as F. langsethiae in 2004 by Torp and Nirenberg [2]. More than 300 Fusarium species exist [4] with different ecophysiological responses to parameters such as temperature and water availability. F. langsethiae is a relatively slow colonizer of temperate cereals although the ability to produce mycotoxins may provide some competitiveness in the phyllosphere microbiome [5, 6].

Some other more economically important Fusarium species, e.g. F. graminearum, have received more attention as they produce visible symptoms in wheat (Fusarium head blight) and have thus been widely sequenced and analyzed previously [7].

The species in the Fusarium family are known to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites including type A and type B trichothecenes and zearalenone. Most significant strides have been made in relation to an understanding of the role of gene clusters involved in type B trichothecenes and fumonisins, which are produced predominantly by F. graminearum/F. culmorum and F. verticillioides/F. proliferatum, respectively [8]. In addition, the former species also produces other mycotoxins, such as Zearalenone, Fusaric acids and Moniliformin especially in temperate cereals [9]. However, legislation on contamination of temperate cereals is predominantly focused on type B trichothecenes such as deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Based on substitutions at C-8 and other positions around the core structure, trichothecenes have been classified into four groups (types A, B, C and D) [8], Fusarium species only produce type A and type B. Type A, which have an ester or hydroxyl or no oxygen substitution in the position of C-8, are usually produced by F. armeniacum, F. langsethiae, F. poae, F. sambucinum, F. sporotrichioides, and F. venenatum. Type B, which have a carbonyl group at C-8, are mainly produced by F. graminearum and F. pseudograminearum and F. culmorum. Type A compounds are generally more toxic than type B trichothecenes while the latter are usually produced in higher concentration.

It should be noted however that, many of these studies have focused on the toxin biosynthesis process [10, 11]. Some of these studies use sequencing methods to analyse protein structure or toxin-related biosynthetic gene clusters. However, most of the Fusarium sequences comes from short reads platforms, which may have thus excluded some important functional gene clusters and their proteins.

The aim of this work was to produce a high quality, deep coverage genome assembly for F. langsethiae through a long-reads assembly strategy using the PacBio platform. This allowed us to generate a more complete, continous genome assembly compared to the previous publicly available F. langsethiae assembly. Further analysis including identification of the clusters related to biosynthesis of T-2 and HT-2 mycotoxins was also examined. The relatively small length of fungal genomes makes them ideal candidates for long-reads assembly, since it is possible to achieve deep read coverage, allowing a higher degree of continuity with no noticeable implication on the sequencing costs.


Since this species had not been previously assembled using long-reads, different assemblers were compared to achieve a higher quality overall assembly. After comparing each assembly’s statistical information and BUSCO results, the best assembly was polished as the final assembly. Assembly quality metrics for all five chosen are shown in Table 1, which outlines some basic statistical data from the different assemblies. The total assembly lengths obtained from Canu [12] and Flye [13] were relatively closer to each other compared to SMARTdenovo [14], which had the longest genome length and the largest number of contigs, indicating fragmentation. Most of the GC content results in this study were around 48.4%; the SMARTdenovo assembly was slightly lower. The highest N50 value was achieved by Flye, which was nearly five times longer than the best Canu assembly and 22 times longer than the SMARTdenovo assembly.

Table 1 Basic statistic information of draft assembly from Canu, SMARTdenovo and Flye

The draft assembly from Flye achieved 98.3% completeness, as assessed by BUSCO, and had fewer fragmented and missing hits compared with Canu (See Table 2). On the other hand, the SMARTdenovo assembly only had 11 complete hits, probably due to the fragmented state of this assembly. Considering the contigs length, N50 and BUSCO [15] results, Flye output was considered the best assembly which was then carried forward for error correction.

Table 2 BUSCOs statistic result from Canu, SMARTdenovo and Flye

To improve the assembly quality further, error correction was performed with Pilon based on the previously mentioned publicly available Illumina short reads. Comparing the statistical sequence information and BUSCO results between draft assembly and polished assembly, the length of contigs did not change after hybrid polishing, but the BUSCO results improved from 98.3 to 98.8% (See Table 3). Moreover, 28 of the fragmented genes became either complete [20] or missing [8], which support the fact that Pilon actually removed mis-assemblies from the raw draft. Compared with the previous assembly of another F. langsethiae strain (Fl201059), the draft assembly of this study has better contiguity and slightly higher BUSCO results. To finish the polishing, 23 contigs were detected as mitochondrial hits and were removed from the assembly.

Table 3 Basic sequence statistic information and BUSCO result comparation between before polishing and after polishing

RepeatMasker was deployed using the default parameters, which was followed by RepeatModeller in order to perform de-novo identification and classification of transposable elements (TE). Retroelements represented 4.70% of the total assembly sequence, while DNA transposons formed 21.02%. This figure is comparable to what has been previously reported for F. poae [16, 17]. The detailed classification of repeats and TE is provided in Supplementary File 1.

A series of gene prediction approaches were followed using different settings or alignment models from related species as shown in Table 4. A hints file was created for Augustus using the cDNA sequence of sample Fl201059 downloaded from EMBL-EBI [18]. Firstly, the cDNA contigs were aligned to the assembled genome in order to confirm its suitability. A total of 15,280 alignments were obtained, representing 96% mapping results which confirms its suitability to guide the gene prediction process. GeneID in ab-initio mode predicted 21,848 genes, while Augustus predicted a total 16,900 genes. Then, after training, Augustus predicted 19,336 genes.

Table 4 Number of predicted genes from different tools, settings, and reference species

Following the gene prediction step, a BLAST search was performed of predicted coding genes against the NR database, and the hits were further annotated with GO terms and protein signatures. A total of 19,139 out of 19,336 predicted genes (98.98%) had more than five hits against the NR database. This meant that more than 99% of genes predicted by Augustus were reliable for protein analysis to some extent. Among the hits, most had a similarity percentage higher than 80%; some of them reached 100% similarity with the sequence in the NR database.

More than 50% of the genes in the assembly had top hits compared with F. langsethiae itself. Almost all of these were within the Fusarium genus. Table 5 shows the top 10 BLAST hits distribution, all of them coming from the Fusarium genus. The assembly showed a linkage between F. langsethiae and F. poae, F. oxysporum, F. graminearum, F. sporotrichioides therefore indicating a similarity in the metabolic pathways and/or mycotoxin production. As the F. poae had the highest number of hits amongst all the Fusarium species, it suggests a close relevance between F. langsethiae and F. poae. Indeed, it should be considered that in papers published before 2004, F. langsethiae was considered as “powdery F. poae”. It could be inferred that, F. poae should thus have the closest linkage to F. langsethiae, amongst all the Fusarium species.

Table 5 Top 20 blast top hits distribution among predicted genes

Proteins related to trichothecene and HC-Toxin are shown in Tables 6 and 7 respectively. These tables list the contigs in which each protein was located, as well as the similarity to genes in other species as found via BLAST. The ontology term and ontology ID give a basic description of the protein and its functions.

TRI genes

Table 6 lists gene hits related to the TRI genes cluster. In the BLAST stage, 33 sequences were found. Most of them were gathered at the thirteenth contig of our assembly (as shown in Fig. 1), while some were gathered at the fifty-third and fifty-seventh contigs amongst others.

Fig. 1
figure 1

TRI-genes cluster identified on Contig 13 of the assembly

Table 6 Gene position, for the TRI gene cluster

HC-toxin related genes

Five proteins were found to be related to HC-toxin; all of them are listed in Table 7; Fig. 2. Unlike the previous assembly, we identified two copies of HC-toxin synthetase located on the same contig and only 25 bases apart. Three proteins acted as an HC-toxin efflux carrier TOXA, as shown in Table 7.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Blast hits of the hc-toxin gene highlighting 14 a.a.changes compared to the closest blast hit of F. sporotrichioides

Table 7 Gene position, similarity gene and description of genes related with the keyword “hc-toxin” in assembly annotation

Related secondary metabolite genes

In addition, some contigs were linked to specific genes which are involved in global secondary metabolite biosynthesis. These include aldehyde reductase member 3 (Contig 13) and an efflux pump (Contig 2, 13, 57), ketose reductase (Contig 6, 13).

Polyketide synthases (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptides (NRPS)

Polyketides (PKS) are a group of secondary metabolites with diverse functions, which in fungi can play a role in antifungal activity, for example to compete with other fungal species within the same ecosystem [19]. We have identified a total of 114 NRPS-related genes (See Supplementary Table 1) and a further 24 hits for PKS genes (See Table 8) compared to 12 PKS genes previously identified in F. langsethiae Fl201059 [18].

Table 8 Gene position, similarity gene and description of genes related with the keyword “PKS” in assembly annotation

Mating-type genes (MAT) and cell wall degrading enzymes

MAT genes are controlling sexual reproduction and development in fungi [20]. Here, we identified 6 hits related to MAT including one transcription factor, MAT1-1-3 and MAT-1-1-1 (See Table 9). Additionally, three cuticle-degrading protease on three different contigs were also found (See Table 10).

Table 9 Gene position, similarity gene and description of genes related with the keyword “MAT” in assembly annotation
Table 10 Gene position, similarity gene and description of genes related with the keyword “Cuticle-degrading” in assembly annotation

Discussion and conclusions

With third-generation sequencing, the long reads and high depth generated using the PacBio® SMRT sequencing led to a very high-quality assembly. The quality was not determined according to the contig length or N50 alone; BUSCO was another parameter used to examine the quality of the assembly. Compared to the publicly available assembly of Fl201059 which did not show good quality in the scaffold statistical data (N50 = 86,515 vs. 3.51 Mb in our assembly), but it had a high BUSCO compared to the Saccharomyceta dataset, showing a level of completeness of 98.2% vs. 98.8% in our assembly which had both high-quality contigs and a high BUSCO rate. This means that more coding genes could be predicted by Augustus and GeneID. This provided hints to improve the accuracy of prediction. However, although the hints file could improve the accuracy, the core model in Augustus still came from F. graminearum, a related species. However, training Augustus produced a model based on the F. langsethiae sequence file. With the absence of an aligned BAM file or gene bank structure file from EnsembleFungi Fl201059, a FASTA file containing protein in the same sample was used to train the Augustus model. While the ab initio approach predicted genes with a model from a different species, it has less accuracy compared to the hints and training. Although the hints file improved the accuracy from ab initio to some extent, for some new species such as F. langsethiae, the accuracy from the hints file did not achieve the expectations of the analysis. Training Augustus with data that had 96% similarity with the assembly predicted more genes than ab initio and the hints file.

Mycotoxin production pathways

T-2 and HT-2 toxins are type A trichothecenes which mainly accumulate in oats and can cause immunological or haemotological defects in animals and potentially humans [3].

Almost all proteins related to trichothecene biosynthesis are located on the 13th contig of the assembly, with an additional copy of TRI5 on contig 3 (See Fig. 1).

Other proteins located in other contigs did not seem to have a core function in T-2 and HT-2 biosynthesis, and most of them encoded the transformation or production of TRI-proteins. HC-toxin synthetase was identified on contig 11 as two copies only 25 bps apart. Both copies were identical to the previous F. langsethiae assembly, but with 14 a.a. changes compared to the closest blast hit of the RGP60017 gene of F. sporotrichioides (See Fig. 2). It could be therefore inferred that contig 13 contains the main functional proteins regrouped in a cluster. However, one of the genes encoding a protein involved in HT-2 and T-2 mechanism called TRI1, were found in the contig 3, 12, 53 and 74.

In 2011, [21] described trichothecenes biosynthesis in the Fusarium species. Based on these findings, the biosynthesis process in F. langsethiae with different proteins could be inferred with the gene BLAST results and descriptions of proteins in F. langsethiae based on previous studies of other Fusarium species and the previous draft genome of F. langsethiae [18].

The first step consists in the cyclisation of farnesyl pyrophosphate, which is a primary metabolic intermediate [21] and is mediated by a trichodiene synthase encoded in the gene TRI5 in the 13th contig as well as another hit identified on contig 3, suggesting its presence in two copies. TRI5 is the core gene that mediates the biosynthesis of different trichothecenes (gi | 136,010 | sp | P13513.1 | TRI5_FUSSP), including T-2 toxin. The ontology term of this gene (GO:0045482) indicates its molecular function as a trichodiene synthase. Tri5 is involved in the catalysis of the following reaction: 2-trans, 6-trans-farnesyl diphosphate = diphosphate + trichodiene. The TRI5 gene was first characterised in a F. sporotrichioides strain that produced T-2 toxin [22]. The trichodiene then goes through an oxygenation series catalysed by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase encoded by TRI4 [21]. The TRI4 gene (gi | 927,758,023 | gb | KPA41245.1) encodes a mono-oxygenase molecular function (GO:0004497) leading to the addition of four oxygens at C-2, C-3, C-11 and C-12, using C-13-epoxide to form the intermediate isotrichotriol [23]. Subsequently, isotrichodermol (C-3-OH) is converted to isotrichodermin (C-3-OR) via an acetyltransferase encoded by TRI101 (gi | 927,756,670 | gb | KPA40029.1) in the fifty-seventh contig [24]. The toxicity of Fusarium trichothecenes should be effectively reduced with this step, which serves as a mechanism for the fungal self-protection other trichothecene-producing organisms [25]. TRI101 (gene located in contig 57) acts as part of the transferase activity (GO:0016747) that transfers an acyl group, other than aminoacyl, from one compound to another. Then, a second hydroxyl group is added to C-15, which is controlled by TRI11, encoded in the contig 13 [26].

TRI11 (gi | 927,758,018 | gb | KPA41240.1) works with a molecular function (GO:0016705)—an oxidation-reduction reaction in which hydrogen or electrons are transferred from each of two donors as well as an oxidation- reduction process (GO:0055114). After this TRI3 (gi | 927,758,024 | gb | KPA 41246.1) (GO:0043386) catalyses the acetylation of the 4-hydroxyl to form trichodermin and then, TRI13 protein (gi | 927,758,016 | gb | KPA41238.1) perform the same oxidation-reduction reaction as TRI11 in C-4 [27], followed by another acetylation process by TRI7 (gi | 927,758,025 | gb | KPA41247.1).

The next step of this process in F. sporotrichioides is the addition of a fourth hydroxyl group to C-8 by TRI1, followed by an addition of an isovaleryl moiety thanks to TRI16. Finally, the C-3 position loses the acetyl group via a TRI8-esterase step to produce T-2 toxin [28].

In this study, the TRI1 gene was found in the 3rd and 53rd contigs, and there was about 15% sequence dissimilarity with the TRI1 sequence (gi | 927,755,786 | gb | KPA39264.1) in the database. Since TRI16 was not found, it might have been either mis-matched and mis-labeled by BLAST or missing from the assembly. The gene TRI8 was also found (gi | 927,758,026 | gb | KPA41248.1) and was identified as encoding a triglyceride lipase activity (GO:0004806) and is involved in a reaction in which triacylglycerol + H2O = diacylglycerol + a carboxylate.

Most of the genes linked to T-2 mycotoxin production were found in this assembly, but the TRI9 gene only had sequences for which no literature could be found to describe their function. However, TRI9 has been found not only in F. langsethiae but also other Fusarium species, such as F. sporotrichioides and F. graminearum. It acts upon the integral component of the membrane (GO:0016021) and might be linked with the T-2 mycotoxin transport mechanism.

With regard to the genes identified in relation with the HC-toxin, not enough information was found to support the production pathways in F. langsethiae. However, some genes encoded global regulators such as the efflux pump and carrier of HC-toxin produced by Cochliobolus species might have an evolving relationship with F. langsethiae.


Sequencing Data

F. langsethiae Fe2391 strain was selected as this strain, originating from the UK, has been previously characterized as potent producer of T-2 and HT-2 toxin [6, 29].

To obtain long sequence fungal DNA, the protocol from Bacha [30] was used. Briefly, 3-day-old colonies of F. langsethiae Fe2391 grown on Potatoes Dextrose Agar (PDA) were harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The mycelia were incubated for 10 min at 50 °C in a modified lysis buffer (1% of hexadecyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide, 100mM pH8 EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 20mM pH8 Tris-HCl). The DNA was then extracted 3 times in phenol:chloroform prior to precipitation in isopropanol. The pellet was resuspended with 25U of RNAse prior to sending for sequencing. The DNA size (~20 kb) was validated by gel electrophoresis. The samples were sent to Novogene, China, which generated raw sequencing data using the PacBio® Sequel platform.

Genome Assembly

To achieve the best assembly quality possible, three separate assemblers were used to process the raw F. langsethiae data, namely Canu v1.8, SMARTdenovo, and Flye v2.4.2. Canu has three phases in its pipeline: correction, trimming and assembly. Since Canu is sensitive to the sequences’ genome size, it requires a parameter called ‘error rate’, which refers to the percentage of difference between the two reads in an alignment. The genome size parameter was set to 37,500,000 for this study, based on the length of the assembly publicly available for this species. According to Canus’ user guide, the parameters of error rate should be adjusted according to the coverage and data type of the raw data. Therefore, the error rates were set to 0.045, 0.055, 0.065, 0.075, 0.080, 0.085 and 0.095; this kept the correction, trimming and assembling stages identical. The second assembler used was SMARTdenovo (available at This tool directly utilises reads from raw read alignments without correction or trimming phases, and it provides its own polishing methods to generate accurate consensus sequences. For the present study, the raw data were directly processed by the script with all parameters set to default. The last, and the best performing assembler of the three was Flye, previously called A-Bruijn. It uses a repeat graph as its core data structure and utilises raw data in FASTA or FASTQ format from PacBio®. Flye outputs polished contigs with an error rate less than 30% by default. To run the assembly, the genome size was set to 37,500,000 and other parameters were set to default.

A total of five draft assemblies were generated using all three assemblers. QUAST, a quality assessment tool for genome assemblies [31], was used to examine the basic quality among the contig assemblies by comparing their total length, longest contig and N50 number. The best assembly output was identified according to completeness through orthologs comparison versus the Saccharomyceta OrthoDB [32] data set using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) tool [15]. BUSCO results were judged based on the number of complete BUSCO genes, and then the best assembly was used in the next stage.

To further improve the assembly, polishing was performed using Pilon [33]. Since short reads were absent for this sample, the WGS sequence reads of sample Fl201059 [18] were downloaded from the European Nucleotide Archive and aligned to our assembly using BWA-MEM [34]. This resulted in an alignment file in BAM format, which was then used by Pilon to perform error correction.

Gene prediction and functional annotation

Two gene prediction methods, GeneID [35] and Augustus [36], were used with four separate procedures, GeneID ab-inito, Augustus ab-inito, Augustus with hints and Augustus with training. For ab-initio, Augustus predicted genes using F. graminearum, and GeneID predicted genes using F. oxysporum. Only Augustus had settings that could be used for hints prediction and training. The hints were created from the cDNA file from Fl201059. For training, the BRAKER pipeline [37] with the protein coding file from Fl201059 was used; this pipeline contains an automatic training and prediction pathway using GenomeThreader and Augustus.

A BLAST search [38] was performed to find regions of local similarity between sequences. Gene sequences that had been extracted from prediction tools were output in a GFF format and then made into a FASTA file. Using the blastx command, the FASTA file was compared with the NR nucleotide database. The number of threads was set to 50. The output format of this command was set as BLAST archive (ASN.1). Functional annotation was performed using OmicsBox (available at The BLAST hits were imported into OmicsBox to perform Gene Ontology mapping and annotation. InterPro protein signatures and domain hits were obtained using InterProScan5. The output was then imported in OmicsBox and merged with the GO annotation and mapping results.

Availability of data and materials

The genome assembly generated in this study as well as the raw sequence reads are available via the NCBI SRA repository under the Bioproject number: PRJNA701381 (Link:


  1. Adhikari M, Negi B, Kaushik N, Adhikari A, Al-Khedhairy AA, Kaushik NK, et al. T-2 mycotoxin: toxicological effects and decontamination strategies. Oncotarget. 2017;8(20):33933–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Torp M, Nirenberg HI. Fusarium langsethiae sp. nov. on cereals in Europe. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95(3):247–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain C. Scientific Opinion on the risks for public and animal health related to the presence of citrinin in food and feed. EFSA Journal. 2012;10(3):2605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Summerell BA. Resolving Fusarium: Current Status of the Genus. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019;57:323–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokkonen M, Medina, Magan N. Comparative study of water and temperature relations of growth and T-2/HT-2 toxin production by strains of Fusarium sporotrichioides and Fusarium langsethiae. World Mycotoxin Journal. 2012;5:365–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Verheecke-Vaessen C, Garcia-Cela E, Lopez-Prieto A, Osk Jonsdottir I, Medina A, Magan N. Water and temperature relations of Fusarium langsethiae strains and modelling of growth and T-2 and HT-2 mycotoxin production on oat-based matrices. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021;348:109203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King R, Urban M, Hammond-Kosack MC, Hassani-Pak K, Hammond-Kosack KE. The completed genome sequence of the pathogenic ascomycete fungus Fusarium graminearum. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Munkvold GP. Fusarium Species and Their Associated Mycotoxins. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1542:51–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. GarcÌa-Cela E, Verheecke-Vaessen C, Magan N, Medina. The ``-omicì9 contributions to the understanding of mycotoxin production under diverse environmental conditions. Current opinion in food science. 2018;23:97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rep M, Kistler HC. The genomic organization of plant pathogenicity in Fusarium species. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(4):420–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Merhej J, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C. Regulation of trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium: recent advances and new insights. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91(3):519–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):722–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):540–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Wu S, Li A, Ruan J. SMARTdenovo: A  de novo Assembler Using Long Noisy Reads. MDPI AG; 2020.

  15. Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: Assessing Genome Assembly and Annotation Completeness. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:227–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Witte TE, Harris LJ, Nguyen HDT, Hermans A, Johnston A, Sproule A, et al. Apicidin biosynthesis is linked to accessory chromosomes in Fusarium poae isolates. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanheule A, Audenaert K, Warris S, van de Geest H, Schijlen E, Hofte M, et al. Living apart together: crosstalk between the core and supernumerary genomes in a fungal plant pathogen. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lysoe E, Frandsen RJN, Divon HH, Terzi V, Orru L, Lamontanara A, et al. Draft genome sequence and chemical profiling of Fusarium langsethiae, an emerging producer of type A trichothecenes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;221:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fatema U, Broberg A, Jensen DF, Karlsson M, Dubey M. Functional analysis of polyketide synthase genes in the biocontrol fungus Clonostachys rosea. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubini A, Belfiori B, Riccioni C, Tisserant E, Arcioni S, Martin F, et al. Isolation and characterization of MAT genes in the symbiotic ascomycete Tuber melanosporum. New Phytol. 2011;189(3):710–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCormick SP, Stanley AM, Stover NA, Alexander NJ. Trichothecenes: from simple to complex mycotoxins. Toxins (Basel). 2011;3(7):802–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hohn TM, Vanmiddlesworth F. Purification and characterization of the sesquiterpene cyclase trichodiene synthetase from Fusarium sporotrichioides. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1986;251(2):756–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCormick SP, Alexander NJ, Proctor RH. Fusarium Tri4 encodes a multifunctional oxygenase required for trichothecene biosynthesis. Can J Microbiol. 2006;52(7):636–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McCormick SP, Alexander NJ, Trapp SE, Hohn TM. Disruption of TRI101, the gene encoding trichothecene 3-O-acetyltransferase, from Fusarium sporotrichioides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(12):5252–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura M, Kaneko I, Komiyama M, Takatsuki A, Koshino H, Yoneyama K, et al. Trichothecene 3-O-acetyltransferase protects both the producing organism and transformed yeast from related mycotoxins. Cloning and characterization of Tri101. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(3):1654–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander NJ, Hohn TM, McCormick SP. The TRI11 gene of Fusarium sporotrichioides encodes a cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase required for C-15 hydroxylation in trichothecene biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64(1):221–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee T, Han YK, Kim KH, Yun SH, Lee YW. Tri13 and Tri7 determine deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-producing chemotypes of Gibberella zeae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(5):2148–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McCormick SP, Alexander NJ. Fusarium Tri8 encodes a trichothecene C-3 esterase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(6):2959–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Isidro-Sanchez J, D’Arcy Cusack K, Verheecke-Vaessen C, Kahla A, Bekele W, Doohan F, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of Fusarium langsethiae infection and mycotoxin accumulation in oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Genome. 2020;13(2):e20023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bacha N, Echarki Z, Mathieu F, Lebrihi A. Development of a novel quantitative PCR assay as a measurement for the presence of geosmin-producing fungi. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(5):1144–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kriventseva EV, Kuznetsov D, Tegenfeldt F, Manni M, Dias R, Simao FA, et al. OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D807-D11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Parra G, Blanco E, Guigo R. GeneID in Drosophila. Genome Res. 2000;10(4):511–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(5):637–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoff KJ, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M, Stanke M. Whole-Genome Annotation with BRAKER. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:65–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Web Server issue):W29-33.

Download references


Not Applicable.


This research is supported by a BBSRC-SFI research grant (BB/P001432/1) between Cranfield University, UK and the University College Dublin, Ireland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The “Oats for the future” Investigators team (NM, AM, FM) devised the original conceptual ideas. CV performed the DNA and RNA extractions with assistance from AM. FM devised the assembly strategy. YZ assembled and annotated the genome under supervision from CM. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fady Mohareb.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuo, Y., Verheecke-Vaessen, C., Molitor, C. et al. De novo genome assembly and functional annotation for Fusarium langsethiae. BMC Genomics 23, 158 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: