Skip to main content

Zinc supplementation modifies brain tissue transcriptome of Apis mellifera honeybees

Abstract

Background

Bees are the most important group of pollinators worldwide and their populations are declining. In natural conditions, Apis mellifera depends exclusively on food from the field to meet its physiological demands. In the period of scarcity, available resources are insufficient and artificial supplementation becomes essential for maintaining the levels of vitamins, proteins, carbohydrates, and minerals of colonies. Among these minerals, zinc is essential in all living systems, particularly for the regulation of cell division and protein synthesis, and is a component of more than 200 metalloenzymes.

Results

The total RNA extracted from the brain tissue of nurse bees exposed to different sources and concentrations of zinc was sequenced. A total of 1,172 genes in the treatment that received an inorganic source of zinc and 502 genes that received an organic source of zinc were found to be differentially expressed among the control group. Gene ontology enrichment showed that zinc can modulate important biological processes such as nutrient metabolism and the molting process.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that zinc supplementation modulates the expression of many differentially expressed genes and plays an important role in the development of Apis mellifera bees. All the information obtained in this study can contribute to future research in the field of bee nutrigenomics.

Peer Review reports

Background

Bees are the most important group of pollinators in the world that visit90% of the major107 global crop types and assist the maintenance of ecosystems [1]. Apis mellifera honeybees are the most commonly managed species, which provide high-value pollination services for agricultural crops [1]. Recent declines in honeybees population have been attributed to multiple interacting stressors, of which, the most important are nutrition deficits, pesticides, parasites, and pathogens [2].

Under natural conditions, Apis mellifera bees depend exclusively on two food sources to supply colonies: nectar as a source of energy and pollen as a source of protein, vitamins, and minerals [3, 4]. Minerals are needed to maintain life because they play significant roles as structural components and enzymatic cofactors [5]. Among the essential minerals, some are distinct for participating in important metabolic pathways, such as zinc [6].

Zinc is the second most essential element in all living systems and is essential for the regulation of cell division, protein synthesis, and DNA [6,7,8]. Zinc ions can penetrate the peritrophic membrane and midgut epithelial cells, and transporters for delivering zinc ions can be influenced by dietary Zn levels [7]. This microelement is transferred to the hemolymph, where vitellogenin acts as the main Zn transporter [8, 9]. Zinc is a component of more than 200 metalloenzymes and other metabolic compounds that modulate biochemical processes which involve the maintenance of cell membrane integrity, cellular respiration and reproduction, and other essential functions such as binding nucleic acids as a zinc finger complex [10].

Zinc cannot be stored in the body [11] and requires regular dietary intake to meet physiological needs. Thus, zinc is routinely supplemented in human and livestock foods and feeds for normal physiological functions as well as to meet daily requirements [12]. Zinc is commonly supplemented in two forms: organic form (methionine) and inorganic form (sulfate); minerals linked to organic molecules called chelates have advantages over the inorganic form, with greater absorption and less competition for binding sites with other minerals [13]. However, few studies have clarified the nutritional requirements of Apis mellifera bees.

The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has revolutionized the way biological research is conducted [14]; in this study, RNA-seq was used to investigate the effects of zinc supplementation at different dosages and sources on the transcriptome profiles of A. mellifera bees.

Results and Discussion

Sequencing quality and Differential Gene Expression (DGE) library sequencing

DGE tag libraries were constructed and sequenced using total RNA extracted from the brain tissue of A. mellifera nursing bees. For each library, brain tissue was dissected from five worker bees and pooled as a sample to construct the library.

The sequencing resulted in a total of 352,957,663 raw sequences. The sequences were analyzed using FastQC program. No adapter content was identified. The global mean sequence quality was 36 (Phred Score), and the mean sequence length was 76 bp. The per tile quality was excellent and no variations were identified. The %GC content observed was 40%. No sequence was flagged as poor quality. The mean per base sequence quality from base 1 to base 74 was 34.26, with minimum of 30.95 at the 76th base and maximum of 35.2 at the 6th base. The sequence alignment resulted in a mean mapping rate of 96.15% (Table 1).

Table 1 Sequencing data quality

The sequencing results showed that the four biological replicates of each sample had high reproducibility with high expression correlation value (Figure S1), suggesting the high reliability of the sequencing results (Table S1).

Analysis of gene expression of bees supplemented with different sources of zinc

After supplementing the bees with different concentrations of inorganic zinc, the treatments showed 1,172 differentially expressed genes when compared to the control, with theZnI75 group having the highest number of upregulated and downregulated genes, followed by ZnI50 and ZnI25, which had the lowest number of expressed genes. Of these differentially expressed genes, 64, 116, and 657 were exclusively expressed in the ZnI25, ZnI50, and ZnI75 groups, respectively, and 74 genes were expressed for the three treatments, with the treatment with 75 ppm having a higher number of modulated genes (Fig. 1). As we increased the dose of inorganic zinc in the diet, gene expression also increased. However, as shown in Fig. 1, the medium doses containing inorganic zinc (50 ppm) showed a higher number of upregulated genes compared to the downregulated ones, unlike the other dosages (25 and 75 ppm), which showed a lower number of upregulated genes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between experimental groups (ZnI25, ZnI50, and ZnI75) compared to control group Zn0. (A) Histogram of DEGs between experimental groups supplemented with inorganic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc (25 ppm, 50 ppm, and 75 ppm). (B) Venn diagram of DEGs between experimental groups supplemented with inorganic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc

Regarding the organic zinc supplementation, the treatments showed 502 genes that were differentially expressed when compared to the control, with the ZnO25 group having the highest number of upregulated and downregulated genes, followed by ZnO75 and ZnO50, which had the lowest number of expressed genes.

ZnO75 group having the highest number of upregulated genes and the ZnO25 and ZnO50 groups with the highest number of downregulated genes. Of these genes, 288, 16, and 57 genes were expressed exclusively in the ZnO25, ZnO50, and ZnO75 groups, respectively, and 48 genes were expressed in the three treatments, with the treatment with 25 ppm having a higher number of modulated genes (Fig. 2). Contrary to what was observed with inorganic zinc, the treatment with a higher dose of organic zinc in the supplementation of A. mellifera bees had a smaller number of modulated genes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)between experimental groups (ZnO25, ZnO50, and ZnO75) compared to control group Zn0. (A) Histogram of DEGs between experimental groups supplemented with organic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc (25 ppm, 50 ppm, and 75 ppm). (B) Venn diagram of DEGs between experimental groups supplemented with inorganic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between treatments supplemented with organic and inorganic sources of zinc

Based on a comparison of treatments supplemented with the same concentrations of zinc, but with different sources (organic vs. inorganic), we found that organic zinc showed higher gene expression only in the lowest concentration of zinc supplementation (25 ppm). In the other experimental groups (50 and 75 ppm), inorganic zinc showed higher gene expression when compared to treatments supplemented with zinc from organic sources (Fig. 3). In addition, the results suggest that an organic source of zinc at a lower concentration (25 ppm) can increase the gene expression of A. mellifera. Contrasting this, for inorganic zinc, the highest concentration (75 ppm) can increase the gene expression of honeybees.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between experimental groups supplemented with inorganic and organic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc. A) Venn diagram of DEGs between experimental groups ZnO25 and ZnI25 compared to control group Zn0.B) Venn diagram of DEGs between experimental groups ZnO50 and ZnI50 compared to control group Zn0. C) Venn diagram of DEGs between experimental groups ZnO75 and ZnI75 compared to control group Zn0. D) Histogram of DEGs between experimental groups supplemented with both groups, inorganic and organic source of zinc at each concentration of zinc

According to the histogram, the gene expression of both groups has a predominance of down-regulated genes for all levels of zinc supplementation. When we observe separately, the group that received 75 ppm of inorganic zinc (ZnI75) had the greatest number genes expressed, being mostly downregulated genes, in the ZnI50 group we observed a greater number of upregulated genes compared to the downregulated genes, the ZnI25 group presented the lesser number of regulated genes with the greater number of downregulated genes. Regarding the groups that received organic zinc, the group that received25 ppm of inorganic zinc (ZnO25) had the greatest number genes expressed, being mostly downregulated genes, in the ZnO75 group we observed a greater number of upregulated genes compared to the downregulated genes, the ZnO50 group presented the lesser number of regulated genes with the greater number of downregulated genes.

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis

In gene ontology (GO) analysis, when we compared the intersection between genes differentially expressed for the two sources of zinc (organic and inorganic), we observed that both sources stimulated genes related to important biological processes, such as chitin metabolism, amino acids, and amino glycans, as well as structural components of A. mellifera bee chitin (Figure S2).

Zinc is an essential mineral for all living beings [8], and in insects, it can be related to body growth. For insects to exchange their chitin exoskeleton and complete their development, the action of chitinase enzymes is necessary, whose function is to digest the polysaccharides that form chitin [15,16,17]. During the metamorphosis process, the chitinase BmCHT5 is expressed in Bombyx mori [18] and when a zinc finger element is present (BR–C Z4), the expression of this enzyme is improved. Therefore, the amount of zinc absorbed in bee nutrition can influence the action of these enzymes and, consequently, the process of molting these insects.

According to Keilling [19], zinc is a structural and catalytic component of hundreds of classes of enzymes and is highly related to the metabolism of nucleic acids and carbohydrates. In addition to affecting the functioning of digestive enzymes in rapidly growing tissues, zinc deficiency dramatically decreases the synthesis of RNA, DNA, and proteins, thereby decreasing the rate of mitosis and compromising tissue growth and recovery [11].

A. mellifera bees depend exclusively on two sources of nutrients, pollen and nectar. Pollen is composed of starch, vitamins, and minerals and depends on the action of amylase enzymes to be digested. Among these nutrients, zinc is essential for the regulation of amylase enzymes, and its function has been described in several animal species, such as pigs, rats, and chickens [20].

Inorganic zinc treatments showed1,172 differentially expressed genes, enabling the GO analysis. Our results suggest that the sources of inorganic zinc enriched the pathways related to important biological processes, such as drug and nutrient metabolism, cuticle development and metabolism, and processes related to arthropod ecdysis (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gene ontology analysis of the experimental groups supplemented with inorganic source of zinc (ZnI25, ZnI50, and ZnI75). Red color indicates biological processes, blue color indicates molecular functions, and green color indicates cellular components

Among the altered gene pathways, detoxification seems to be related to zinc supplementation. A. mellifera bees depend on a set of enzymes to metabolize drugs and pesticides, including cytochrome P450 monooxygenases [21]. Cytochrome P450 plays a role in the detoxification of phytochemicals present in the food consumed by bees [22,23,24]. Our results suggest that zinc participates in the detoxification process and may modulate the action of monooxygenase enzymes in bees.

We observed the modulation of genes related to the body development processes of bees. Hiki [25] analyzed the crustacean transcriptome and reported that exposure to inorganic zinc (zinc sulfate) dosages influenced genes related to the exoskeleton, thereby inhibiting the molting process in these arthropods.

For organic zinc treatments, we identified 502 differentially expressed genes, enabling the GO analysis. Our results suggest that the sources of organic zinc enriched the pathways related to important biological processes, such as nutrient metabolism and cuticle development (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Gene ontology analysis of the experimental groups supplemented with organic source of zinc (ZnO25, ZnO50, and ZnO75). Red color indicates biological processes, i.e., molecular functions and the blue color indicates KEGG

According to the GO analysis, organic zinc supplementation influenced specific pathways related to lipid metabolism. Organic zinc sources altered gene pathways related to the enzyme 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase (DEH) activity, lysosome activity, and chitin binding. DEH is a key member of lipid metabolism [26] involved in very long chain fatty acid synthesis, which interacts with several elongases and plays an essential role during development, differentiation, and maintenance of a number of tissue types [27].

In insects such as Musca sp., a few lysosomes may occur and contain minerals such as Ca, Fe, Cu, P, and Zn with functions related to mineral detoxification. Insects deprived of organs with both spherocrystals and lysosomes are less able to resist mineral contamination [28]. According to the GO results, organic zinc supplementation may increase the activity of lysosomes, possibly allowing it to store the amount of zinc absorbed.

As observed in treatments that received zinc from an inorganic source, organic zinc also modulated the expression of genes related to chitin binding, suggesting a relationship between the process of ecdysis and the mineral zinc absorbed by A. mellifera honeybees.

Among the statistically enriched pathways in both treatments (Fig. 6), we obtained relationships with energy metabolism (Pyruvate, Glycerlipidio and Glyciolysis). Glycolipids are widely distributed in every tissue of the body, particularly in nervous tissue such as brain which depends on high energy demand to perform its functions [29]. Glycolysis and the oxidation of pyruvate and Ascorbate, is related to antioxidant metabolism pathways were Zinc is directly involved in antioxidant enzymes [30], which catalyze the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in water, using ascorbate as an electron donor. H2O2 is a reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by aerobic metabolism and in stressful situations [31]. Brain tissues are more vulnerable to oxidative stress than other insect tissues, as they consume much oxygen and contain large amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids available for lipid peroxidation [32].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Gene ontology analysis of ZnO and ZnI groups interaction

Heat map of DGE from experimental groups

The heatmap graph (Fig. 7) shows that the colonies that received dosages of inorganic zinc modulated specific genes in the control group. Among these genes, Apid1 and Burs were positively modulated.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Clustering analysis of the differentially expressed genes between experimental groups supplemented with inorganic source of zinc and control group

In the figure, ‘Apid1’ refers to the apidaecin1 gene, characterized by Casteel [33], which is related to a group of antibacterial peptides, and the main humoral components of hemolymph are induced in infections caused by bacteria. ‘Burs’ refers to the Bursicon gene, a neurohumoral agent responsible for cuticle pigmentation and wing expansion during insect metamorphosis [34]. Our transcriptome analysis indicated that zinc from inorganic sources positively modulated genes related to immunity and body development processes in Apis mellifera bees.

Among the downregulated genes previously studied, ATP5G2, Cpap3-d, Apd-1, Apd-2, Apd-3, TpnCIIb, and CPR27,thegenes of the Apid family were characterized by Kucharski [35], whose function is related to the production of cuticle proteins in A. mellifera. The Apd-1 gene can interfere with cuticular maturation in adults, Apd-2 is found in the internal cuticles (stomach and trachea), and Apd-3 is more widely expressed, which is related to cuticles and not pigmented.

ATP5G2 (NCBI) is related to the synthesis of ATP by mitochondria. TpnCIIb participates in the synthesis of troponin C, which is responsible for the muscle contraction mechanism [36] and CPR27 (NCBI) is a cuticular protein that is possibly related to the exoskeleton of these insects.

Concerning the referred biological processes, we observed that the inorganic zinc measurements mainly altered genes related to the arthropod body development process. As previously reported by Hiki [25], in crustaceans, zinc may have a direct relationship with the inhibition of the molting process. The process of energy synthesis (ATP) and muscle contraction mediated by troponin C also seems to be related, since at this stage the arthropod needs a large amount of energy to rupture the exoskeleton and undergoesits metamorphosis.

Regarding the groups supplemented with organic zinc (Fig. 8), we observed less enrichment of pathways when compared to treatments that received zinc from an inorganic source. However, some modulated genes that are common in the groups that received supplementation with an inorganic zinc source such as Apd-2 and CPR19, showed that the mineral zinc, regardless of the source, can affect metabolic pathways related to extremely important biological processes in A. mellifera honeybees.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Clustering analysis of the differentially expressed genes between experimental groups supplemented with organic source of zinc and control groups

Conclusions

Our results indicate that zinc supplementation modulates the expression of many differentially expressed genes with an important role in the development of Apis mellifera bees, such as chitin binding and metabolic processes. All the information obtained from this study can contribute to future research in the field of bee nutrigenomics.

Material and Methods

Local

The experiment was conducted at the apiary in the beekeeping area of the Lageado Experimental Farm, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. It was conducted at the following geographic coordinates: 22° 49′ South and 48° 24′ West. The area is characterized by a humid subtropical climate with an average altitude of 623 m.

Experimental Groups

Thirty-five beehives of Africanized A. mellifera were standardized for the number of breeding and feeding frames and distributed in four treatments (five hives per treatment):n0, control treatment without organic zinc supplementation; ZnO25, supplementation with 25 ppm organic zinc; ZnO50, supplementation with 50 ppm organic zinc; ZnO75, supplementation with 75 ppm organic zinc; ZnI25, supplementation with 25 ppm inorganic zinc; ZnI50, supplementation with 50 ppm inorganic zinc; ZnI75, supplementation with 75 ppm inorganic zinc.

All treatments were supplemented with sugar syrup. However, in the Zn0 treatment, there was no addition of organic zinc, while the other treatments received different concentrations of organic zinc, as described previously.

These values were based on the recommendation of Herbert and Shimanuki [18], who suggested the supplementation of 50 ppm of inorganic zinc.

The organic zinc source used was ferrous zinc methionine (16% zinc) and the inorganic source used was zinc sulfate, which was diluted in sugar syrup at a ratio of 1:1 (m/v) commercial crystal sugar and water, supplied using a Boardman feeder (500 mL per week) for one month. The levels provided were confirmed by atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS)for the organic and inorganic zinc levels. The following values were obtained: Zn0, 0.00 ppm; ZnO25, 23.16 ppm; ZnO50, 41.07 ppm; ZnO75, 67.44 ppm; ZnI25, 23.5 ppm; ZnI50, 49.4 ppm;ZnI75, 75.09 ppm.

Bee Harvest

At the end of the experimental period, approximately 140 6-day-old bees from 35 hives were collected. For the collection, 12 frames with operculated brood areas were removed, one frame per hive, and then they were wrapped in tissue and placed in an incubator at 30 °C and humidity of 60% until the emergence of adults. The emerged workers were marked on the pronotum with a non-toxic pen, while they were attached to the frame. After being marked, the bees were reintroduced into their original hives, and smoke was used to disguise the colony recognition hydrocarbons that could hinder the acceptance of the returning bees. After six days, each bee was collected using an entomological tweezer and immediately stored in plastic pots in an ultra-freezer (− 80 °C) [37].

Preparation and sequencing of the RNA-Seq library

Total RNA was extracted from the brain pools of A. mellifera nurse bees (20 brains per pool) using the TRIzol® reagent protocol according to the manufacturer's instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) [38]. RNA concentrations were quantified in each sample using a QubitTM 2.0 fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The levels of RNA degradation were assessed using a 1% agarose gel. The cDNA libraries were constructed with 200 ng of total RNA using the SureSelect Strand Specific RNA Library Preparation Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. The products from the library were sequenced using an Illumina Nextseq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) in a single-bore run of 150 bp.

RNA-Seq data processing and difference analysis of genetic expressions

The FASTQC program was used to check the adapter content and assess the quality of raw readings. Data alignment was performed with Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.12, using Amel_HAv3.1 from NCBI (RefSeq assembly accession: GCF_003254395.2) as a reference. The feature count matrix was created using HTSeq v0.11.2 and the GTF annotation file from Amel_HAv3.1. Data analysis, visualization, and plotting were performed using RStudio for the R language, including the ggplot2 v3.3.2 package. Differential expression analysis was performed using the edgeR v3.30.3 package available at Bioconductor software project for the R language. Low expression genes were filtered by keeping genes that had the count per million greater than one in at least two of the samples. The counts were normalized using the TMM normalization. The negative binomial generalized log-linear model was used in the differential expression analysis, and the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure (FDR) was used for multiple testing corrections. Genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered to be significantly regulated.

Genetic ontology analysis

Gene ontology analysis was performed for the lists of genes identified with differential expression using the gprofiler2 package, an R interface to the g: Profiler tools (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost). Fisher's exact test p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure (FDR) for multiple testing correction, and statistical significance was considered when the adjusted p-value was < 0.05. KEGG pathways database were obtained from KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/), and then the statistical enrichment of DEGs in KEGG pathways was determined using gprofiler2 package for R [39].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository, https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA730561, BioProjectID PRJNA730561.

References

  1. Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences. 2007;274(1608):303–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolezal AG, Toth AL. Feedbacks between nutrition and disease in honey bee health. Current opinion in insect science. 2018;26:114–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Potts, S.G. et al. (2016). Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature. 540:220–239.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20588.

  4. Ghosh S, Jung C. Nutritional value of bee-collected pollens of hardy kiwi, Actinidia arguta (Actinidiaceae) and oak, Quercus sp. (Fagaceae). (2017). J Asia-Pac Entomol. 20:245–51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.01.009.

  5. Haraguchi H. Metallomics as integrated biometal science. JAnal At Spectrom. 2004;19(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1039/b308213j.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eyer, M, Neumann, P, Dietemann, V. (2016) A look into the cell: honey storage in honey bees, Apis mellifera. PloS one, (8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161059.

  7. Cousins RJ, Liuzzi JP, Lichten LA. Mammalian zinc transport, trafficking, and signals. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:24085–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbehenn RV, Martin MM. The protective role of the peritrophic membrane in the tannin-tolerant larvae of Orgyialeucostigma (Lepidoptera). J Insect Physiol. 1992;38:973–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falchuk KH. The molecular basis for the role of zinc in developmental biology. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;188:41–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laity JH, Lee BM, Wright PE. Zinc finger proteins: new insights into structural and functional diversity. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11(1):39–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tudor R, Zalewski PD, Ratnaike RN. Zinc in health and chronic disease. J Nutr Health Aging. 2005;9(1):45–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Swain PS, Rao SB, Rajendran D, Dominic G, Selvaraju S. Nano zinc, an alternative to conventional zinc as animal feed supplement: A review. Animal Nutrition. 2016;2(3):134–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peixoto PV, Malafaia P, Barbosa JD, Tokarnia CH. Princípios de suplementação mineral em ruminantes. Revista Veterinária Brasileira. 2005;25(3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2005000300011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Wachholtz M, Wang J, Liao X, Lu G. Analysis of the skin transcriptome in two oujiang color varieties of common carp. PloS one. 2014;9:e90074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kramer KJ, Koga D. Insect chitin: physical state, synthesis, degradation and metabolic regulation. Insect biochemistry. 1986;16(6):851–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer KJ, Muthukrishnan S. Insect chitinases: molecular biology and potential use as biopesticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27(11):887–900.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukamizo T. Chitinolytic enzymes catalysis, substrate binding, and their application. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2000;1(1):105–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Park BS, Yun EY, Je YH, Woo SD, Kang SW, Kang SK. Cloning and expression of a novel gene encoding a new antibacterial peptide from silkworm, Bombyx mori. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;246(2):388–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keilin D, Mann T. Carbonic anhydrase. Nature. 1939;144(3644):442–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedemann MS, Jensen BB, Poulsen HD. Influence of dietary zinc and copper on digestive enzyme activity and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006;84(12):3310–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feyereisen R, et al. Insect cytochrome P450 L.I. Gilbert, et al. (Eds.), Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, Vol. 4. Elsevier; 2005. p. 1–77.

  22. Wiermann R. Phenylpropanoid metabolism by pollen I. Survey of flavonoid components isolated from gymnosperms and angiosperms. Ber Deut Bot Ges. 1968;81:3–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Campos M, Markham KR, Mitchell KA, da Cunha AP. An approach to the characterization of bee pollens via their flavonoid/phenolic profiles. Phytochem Anal. 1997;8:181–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1565(199707)8:4%3c181::AID-PCA359%3e3.0.CO;2-A.

  24. Kenjeric D, Mandic ML, Primorac L, Bubalo D, Perl A. Flavonoid profile of Robinia honeys produced in Croatia. Food Chem. 2007;102:683–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.055.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hiki K, Nakajima N, Watanabe H, Nakajima F, Tobino T. De novo transcriptome sequencing of an estuarine amphipod Grandidierella japonica exposed to zinc. Mar Genomics. 2018;39:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Guttery DS, Pandey R, Ferguson DJ, Wall RJ, Brady D, Gupta D, Holder AA, Tewari R. Plasmodium DEH is ER-localized and crucial for oocyst mitotic division during malaria transmission. Life Science Alliance. 2020;3(12).

  27. Morineau C, Gissot L, Bellec Y, Hematy K, Tellier F, Renne C, Faure J.D. Dual fatty acid elongase complex interactions in arabidopsis. Plos One. 2016;11(9):e0160631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ballan-Dufrançais C. Localization of metals in cells of pterygote insects. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;56(6):403–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mayes PA, Bender DA, Murray R, Granner D, Rodwell V. Gluconeogenesis and control of the blood glucose. Harper’s Illustrated Biochemistry. 26th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books; 2003. p. 153–62.

  30. Zhang g, Zhang w, Cui x, xu b,. Zinc nutrition increases the antioxidant defenses of honey bees. Entomol Exp Appl. 2015;156(3):201–10.

  31. Hegde K, Varma S.D. Protective effect of ascorbate against oxidative stress in the mouse lens. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects. 2004;1670(1):12–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perić-Mataruga V, Ilijin L, Mrdaković M, Todorović D, Prokić M, Matić D, Vlahović M. Parameters of oxidative stress, cholinesterase activity, Cd bioaccumulation in the brain and midgut of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) caterpillars from unpolluted and polluted forests. Chemosphere. 2019;218:416–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Casteels P, Ampe C, Jacobs F, Vaeck M, Tempst P. Apidaecins: antibacterial peptides from honeybees. EMBO J. 1989;8(8):2387–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendive FM, Van Loy T, Claeysen S, Poels J, Williamson M, Hauser F, VandenBroeck J. Drosophila molting neurohormone bursicon is a heterodimer and the natural agonist of the orphan receptor DLGR2. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(10):2171–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kucharski R, Maleszka J, Maleszka R. Novel cuticular proteins revealed by the honey bee genome. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37(2):128–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Eyk J.E., Thomas L.T., Tripet B, Wiesner R.J., Pearlstone J.R., Farah C.S., Hodges R.S. Distinct regions of troponin I regulate Ca2+-dependent activation and Ca2+ sensitivity of the acto-S1-TM ATPase activity of the thin filament. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272(16):10529–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Camilli MP, de Barros DC, Justulin LA, Tse ML, Orsi RDO. Protein feed stimulates the development of mandibular glands of honey bees (Apis mellifera). J Apic Res. 2021;60(1):165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of Rna, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. Biotechniques. 1993;15(3):532–4 536-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Garcia-Elias A, Alloza L, Puigdecanet E, Nonell L, Tajes M, Curado J, Benito B. Defining quantification methods and optimizing protocols for microarray hybridization of circulating microRNAs. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28:1947–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D545–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, process number 2018/00511-9. We thank Capes (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for the scholarship granted to the first author.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, 001.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, process number 2018/00511–9.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.P.C, R.O.O. and S.M.K designed the field experiment, M.P.C. and S.M.K. collected samples and proceed all molecular analysis, M.V.N.A and P.E.M.R proceed all bioinformatics analysis, M.P.C, S.M.K., R.O.O, M.V.N.A. wrote the main manuscript text. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Polizel Camilli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Material. Table S1.

Statistics of differential gene expression sequencing. Figure S1. Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients (Rho) of global expression values. Figure S2. Gene ontology analysis of both experimental group’s intersection. Red color indicates biological processes and blue color indicates KEGG [40,41,42].

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camilli, M.P., Kadri, S.M., Alvarez, M.V.N. et al. Zinc supplementation modifies brain tissue transcriptome of Apis mellifera honeybees. BMC Genomics 23, 282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08464-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08464-1

Keywords

  • Apis mellifera
  • Zinc
  • Gene expression
  • Nutrigenomics