Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evidence of multiple genome duplication events in Mytilus evolution

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 340 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Molluscs remain one significantly under-represented taxa amongst available genomic resources, despite being the second-largest animal phylum and the recent advances in genomes sequencing technologies and genome assembly techniques. With the present work, we want to contribute to the growing efforts by filling this gap, presenting a new high-quality reference genome for Mytilus edulis and investigating the evolutionary history within the Mytilidae family, in relation to other species in the class Bivalvia.

Results

Here we present, for the first time, the discovery of multiple whole genome duplication events in the Mytilidae family and, more generally, in the class Bivalvia. In addition, the calculation of evolution rates for three species of the Mytilinae subfamily sheds new light onto the taxa evolution and highlights key orthologs of interest for the study of Mytilus species divergences.

Conclusions

The reference genome presented here will enable the correct identification of molecular markers for evolutionary, population genetics, and conservation studies. Mytilidae have the capability to become a model shellfish for climate change adaptation using genome-enabled systems biology and multi-disciplinary studies of interactions between abiotic stressors, pathogen attacks, and aquaculture practises.

Introduction

The family Mytilidae constitutes a diverse group of bivalves, broadly distributed in marine environments. Mytilus edulis and Mytilus galloprovincialis are the common species cultivated in Europe and both hybridise with Mytilus trossulus where their geographical distribution overlaps [1, 2] forming the European Mytilus Species Complex [3]. Nonetheless, a number of environmental and genetic barriers work together to maintain genetic discontinuities between the different species of the complex [4]. M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis can be considered cosmopolitan species while M. trossulus remains more geographically confined to the northernmost regions of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans and to the Baltic Sea [5]. At a finer geographical scale, mussel species display an extraordinary capability of environmental adaptation, extending from high inter-tidal to sub-tidal regions, from estuary to fully marine conditions, and from sheltered to extremely wave-exposed shores. Mussels are furthermore exposed to a wide range of potentially pathogenic microorganisms and pollutants, and yet they display a remarkable resilience to stress and infections [6]. Of particular interest are observations of a relatively high heterozygosity, rapid evolutionary responses to environmental threats, including predation [7], and recent suggestions that widespread relaxed selection in “low locomotion” molluscs, such as bivalves, and high copy number variants [8] could underpin observed high resilience and rapid adaptation to new environments [9].

The Phylum Mollusca remains significantly under-represented amongst those with available genomic resources [10]. To date, only two high-quality genomes and associated gene models are available within the Mytilidae family: M. galloprovincialis, first sequenced by Murgarella et al. [11] and then improved by Gerdol et al. [6], and M. coruscus recently sequenced by Li et al. [12] and Yang et al. [13]. Comparative genomics provides an opportunity to investigate the “signatures” that natural selection has left on the genomes of related species. By analysing the frequency distribution of synonymous substitution per synonymous sites, it is possible to identify major evolutionary events, including Whole-Genome Duplications (WGDs). While WGDs are rare within animal lineages, they deeply shaped vertebrate evolution and represent important evolutionary landmarks from which some major lineages have diversified [14]. Furthermore, comparisons among related species adapted to contrasting niches, can provide an opportunity to investigate how their genomes diverge in response to different habitat conditions [15]. In cases where specific amino acids are known to affect protein function, analyses of intra-specific polymorphism and divergence can be used to directly study function variation in natural populations [16, 17]. Both whole genome duplication analysis and positive selection genome-wide analysis can therefore expose the strength and direction of selection on genes’ functional variation and corroborate the adaptive significance of the loci under study [18, 19].

With this work, we want to contribute to the growing efforts in filling the gap in Molluscs genomic resources [20] by presenting a new high-quality reference genome for M. edulis and investigating the evolutionary history within the Mytilidae family and in relation to other species in the class Bivalvia. Here we present a new reference genome for M. edulis; we introduce the first evidence of WGD events in the Mytilidae family and in Bivalvia more generally; finally, we identify gene clusters under significant positive selection within each species of the Mytilidae family for which suitable reference genomes are available (M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus).

The availability of this reference genome will not only increase interest in Mytilidae as a model for ecological and evolutionary research, but will be also a valuable tool for breeding programmes [21]. The discovery of multiple duplication events will enable the correct identification of molecular markers for evolutionary, population genetics, and conservation studies. The Mytilidae have the capability to become a model shellfish for climate change adaptation using genome-enabled systems biology and multi-disciplinary studies of interactions between abiotic stressors, pathogen attacks, and aquaculture practises.

Results

Sequencing results

After sequencing with the PromethION platform, a total of 15.95 million (111.65 Gb) long-reads were generated and used for the genome assembly. The mean length of the sequences was 7002 nt. The Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform produced 652.47 million (195.74 Gb) paired-ended short reads (150 nt). Based on the presumption that the genome size will be similar to that of closely related taxa: M. galloprovincialis [11] and M. coruscus [12] with an estimated genome size of 1.60 Gb and 1.90 Gb respectively; therefore, the estimated sequencing coverage was 64x and 113x, for long and short reads respectively (Table S1).

De novo assembly of the M. edulis genome

Using Jellyfish, the frequency of 17-mers and 23-mers in the Illumina filtered data were determined (Fig. S1) and followed the theoretical Poisson distribution typical of a diploid species [22]. The proportion of heterozygosity in the M. edulis genome was evaluated as being 3.69 and 4.84% respectively, and the genome size was estimated as 1.01 Gb and 1.10 Gb, with a repeat content of 68.13 and 39.91% respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Statistics of the genome assembly of M. edulis
Full size table

Long-reads were assembled, polished with Racon and short-read sequence were corrected with Pilon, creating an assembled genome of 3339 contigs with a total length and contig N50 of 1.83 Gb and 1.10 Mb, respectively Table 1). The realignment of the short-reads also provided descriptions of the mean observed heterozygosity of 0.48%, which is consistent with the most recent evidence collected from de novo Restriction site associated DNA (RAD) analysis [23] and microsatellite loci study [24]. A second M. edulis genome was recently released, NCBI Accession GCA_019925275.1. This chromosome level de novo assembly was only based on long-reads (PacBio Sequel platform), where fewer error corrections are possible; but produced a comparable genome size of 1.65 Gb and contig N50 of 0.49 Mb.

Repeat sequences and gene models

The transposable elements and repetitive sequences have been annotated using RepeatMasker and LTR-Finder. In total, we have found 1.03 Gb (56.33%) of repetitive sequences (Table S2). We used a combined method that integrates ab initio gene prediction and RNA-seq-based prediction to annotate the protein-coding genes in M. edulis genome. A total of 69,246 distinct gene models and 73,842 transcripts were annotated. The completeness of gene regions was further assessed using BUSCO using a Metazoa (release 10) benchmark of 954 conserved Metazoa genes, of which 93.8% had complete gene coverage (including 29.4% duplicated ones), 5.1% were fragmented and only 1.1% were classified as missing (Fig. 1A). These data largely support a high-quality M. edulis genome assembly, which can be used for further investigation. The predicted proteins from the reconstructed genes were subjected to BlastP similarity searches against SwissProt, Pfam, InterPro, KEGG and GO databases. Of the total 69,246 gene models annotated by at least one database, 9005 (13.0%) were annotated in all five databases used (Fig. 1B and Table S3). A total of 31,620 predicted genes were annotated to three major GO classes: “biological processes”, “cellular components” and “molecular functions” (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Gene composition and annotation estimations. A BUSCO evaluation (Metazoa database; number of framework genes 954), 98.9% of the gene were recovered; B A five-way Venn diagram. The figure shows the unique and common genes displaying predicted protein sequence similarity with one or more databases (details in Supplementary Table S3); C Level 2 GO annotations using the gene ontology of assembled transcripts

Full size image

Mitochondrial genome

The mitochondrial genome was retrieved manually from the genome assembly. The sequence of 16.74 kb was validated for continuity and circularity, and fully annotated. The full mitochondrial genome (Fig. 2A) was compared to the reference M. edulis genome [25]. Only one haplotype was recovered which is identical at 99% (85 SNPs) with the reference genomes (EBI Accession NC_006161.1) and is consistent with a female mitotype [26]. Complete annotated mitochondrial genomes for all Mytilinae (subfamily) to date (11 species; Table S4) were collected. Concatenated alignments constructed from all mitochondrial shared CDS sequences were used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2B). This phylogenetic tree is consistent with the species relationships observed in previous studies [27].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Genome assembly. A M. edulis annotated mitochondrial genome; B Phylogenetic tree inferred from the mitochondrial gene

Full size image

Detecting whole genome duplications

To assess the paleo-history of the Mytilinae (subfamily), we performed a comparative genomic investigation. A total of 2293 gene duplications younger than Ks = 5 were inferred across the total data set of 16,291 assembled unigene clusters in Mytilinae (M. coruscus, M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis). The histograms of duplication ages for each species analysed demonstrated evidence of two large-scale duplications (Fig. 3A). Mixture model analyse of Ks distributions (Fig. 3B and Table S5) to identify ancient whole genome duplications [28, 29] were consistent with the two consecutive whole genome duplication events (ɑ-WGD and β-WGD). The duplication distributions each contained evidence of two peaks of similar synonymous divergences. For example, in M. edulis these peaks are located at median Ks of 0.6132 and 1.8196 (Table S5). We extended the analysis to all Bivalvia (class). Out of the 46 whole genomes available, only 7 (including the three Mytilinae) have gene models allowing further analyses (Table S6). All exhibit evidence of ɑ-WGD and β-WGD (Table S5). The median value, for Ks peaks, is compatible with a shared WGD event (compatible age) indicating that these taxa diverged after their most recent WGDs.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ka and Ks analysis. A Distribution of the Ks values of the duplicate pairs in M. coruscus, M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis; B Bivalvia (class) ortholog Ks distribution and multiple WGDs. Combined Ks plot of the gene age distributions of seven species (see Tables S5 and S6). The median peaks for these plots are highlighted. Analyses of ortholog divergence indicated that these taxa diverged after their most recent WGDs

Full size image

Identification and functional analysis of positively selected genes

Figure 4 shows the mean Ka/Ks ratios for each orthologs, unigene cluster, in M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis (Fig. 4A); M. edulis and M. coruscus (Fig. 4B) and M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis (Fig. 4C). In each figure, genes clusters are colour coded to indicate groups of orthologs positively selected in both species (blue), species-specific positively selected orthologs (red), and groups of orthologs of interest (green) involved in immunity, stress response and shell formation. Collectively, the data in Fig. 4 provide a new insight into positive selection occurring in the three Mytilus species object of this study.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mean Ka/Ks ratios for each orthologs cluster in the A M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis; B M. edulis and M. coruscus; C M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis

Full size image

The functional analysis of positively selected orthologs has also allowed for the identification of gene duplications within assembled unigene clusters involved in key physiological processes. Here, we provide an overview of the identified functions of genes under positive selection. When M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis Ka/Ks ratios are plotted (Fig. 4A), several gene clusters can be observed to be under positive selection in both species (in blue). Of these, four were identified as contributing to immunity, stress response or shell formation: the WNT Inhibitory Factor 1 (WIF1), the nucleotide exchange factor SIL1, the kelch-like protein and the midline (MID1) protein. WIF1 contributes to several immune response functions [30], and presented a Ka/Ks value of 1.4 and 1.8 for M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis respectively. SIL1 is a protein that interacts with Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) during stress responses [31], and showed a Ka/Ks value of 1.4 and 1.6 for M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis, respectively. The kelch-like protein facilitates protein binding and dimerisation [32], and presented a Ka/Ks value of 1.4 and 1.7 for M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis, respectively. Finally, the MID1 protein, presenting E3 ubiquitin ligase activity [33], showed a Ka/Ks value of 1.4 and 1.6 for M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis, respectively.

Many of the gene clusters were also found to be under intense positive selection in M. galloprovincialis, but under intense purifying selection in M. edulis or vice versa (in red). These genes are of particular interest as they indicate relatively rapid divergence between the two species. In Fig. 4, the genes with highly divergent selection are: the Glycolipid transfer protein, a ubiquitous protein characterised by their ability to accelerate the intermembrane transfer of glycolipids [34]; The SGNH Hydrolase-Like Protein for which no function has been identified [35]; The vitellogenic carboxypeptidase-like protein, involved in key developmental processes [36]. Furthermore, two unknown proteins with Ka/Ks values of 1.7 and 1.5 for M. galloprovincialis and Ka/Ks value of 0.2 and 0.4 for M. edulis have also been identified. On the other hand, gene clusters with high Ka/Ks values for M. edulis but low for M. galloprovincialis included: Mucolipin, which promotes calcium homeostasis and is involved in stress response functions [37]. The KAT8 regulatory NSL complex with developmental and cellular homeostasis function [38]. The TolB-like protein, involved in a tol-dependent translocation system [39]. The RING finger protein 170, which mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors, and it is involved in immune response functions [33] and finally, Fibropellin, a cell adhesion protein [40]. Only a limited number of gene clusters appear to be under positive selection amongst those commonly used in immunity, stress response and shell formation comparative studies (in green), and the majority of the genes clusters showed negative selection with the exception of four, which resulted to be all involved in immune response pathways [41]. Of these, three were positively selected in M. galloprovincialis and conserved in M. edulis (membrane-bound C-type lectin, Galectin 3, MAP kinase 4-like) and one was positively selected in M. edulis and conserved in M. galloprovincialis (TNF ligand-like 2).

The comparison of Ka/Ks values between M. coruscus and M. edulis (Fig. 4B) shows a similar picture to that of M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis (Fig. 4A). Positively selected orthologs in both species (with Ka/Ks values ranging from 1.3 to 1.9) include: the nucleotide exchange factor SIL1; the archease-like protein, related to stress response functions [42]; the MID1 protein and the thiosulfate/3-mercaptopyruvate sulfotransferase protein involved in developmental and stress response functions [43]. The ortholog clusters positively selected in M. coruscus but conserved in M. edulis (Ka/Ks values from 1.6 to 2.0 and from 0.3 to 0.7 respectively) include: the purine-nucleoside phosphorylase, which encodes an enzyme which reversibly catalyses the phosphorolysis of purine nucleosides [44]; the palmitoyl-protein thioesterase, which facilitates the morphological development of neurons and synaptic function in mature cells [45], and the ADAR protein which is an RNA-binding protein and has antiviral immunity in marine molluscs [46]. Two further proteins with unknown associated functions and with Ka/Ks values of 1.8 and 1.7 for M. coruscus and of 0.3 and 0.5 for M. edulis were also identified. Similarly, orthologs positively selected in M. edulis but conserved in M. coruscus were functionally characterised and resolved to be the same as those described for M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis (Fig. 4A). Only two gene clusters showed positive selection amongst those of physiological interest (Fig. 4B, in green). C-type lectin 7 (immunity) was positively selected in M. coruscus with a Ka/Ks value of 1.0 and 0.4 for M. coruscus and M. edulis, respectively; while TNF ligand-like 2 (immunity) is presenting positive selection in both species, with Ka/Ks values of 1.0 and 0.9 for M. coruscus and M. edulis, respectively.

In the M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus comparison (Fig. 4C), positively selected proteins in both species (in blue) include: the nucleotide exchange factor SIL1, the importin-7 protein, involved in nuclear import of histones and the homeobox protein cut-like (CUTL), involved in cell-cell adhesion interactions that are required for normal development [47]. The ortholog clusters positively selected in M. galloprovincialis (in red) but conserved in M. coruscus (Ka/Ks values from 1.4 to 1.8 and from 0.2 to 0.7 respectively) are the same as described in M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis (Fig. 4A). The ortholog clusters positively selected in M. coruscus (in red) but conserved in M. galloprovincialis (Ka/Ks values from 1.6 to 1.9 and 0.3 to 0.4 respectively) are again the same as described in M. coruscus and M. edulis (Fig. 4B). The proteins positively selected for M. galloprovincialis and conserved for M. coruscus (Fig. 4C, in green) are: the membrane-bound C-type lectin (immunity) with a Ka/Ks value of 1.3 and 0.3 for M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus, respectively. The galectin 3 protein (immunity) with a Ka/Ks value of 1.0 and 0.3 for M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus, respectively. And the MAP kinase 4-like protein (immunity) with a Ka/Ks value of 0.8 and 0.6 for M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus, respectively. Finally, two genes showed positive selection among those of physiological interest (in green) in favour of M. coruscus, and conserved for M. galloprovincialis. The TNF ligand-like 2 (immunity) with a Ka/Ks value of 1.0 and 0.6 for M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis, respectively. And C-type lectin 7 (immunity) with a Ka/Ks value of 1.0 and 0.4 for M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis, respectively.

The vast majority of our orthologs of interest (in green) selected from the literature have not shown a substantial number of proteins under positive selection for genes related to immunity, stress response, and shell formation.

For completeness, all genes involved in immunity, stress response and shell formation under positive selection in any of the three species examined here, were identified and grouped by species (Table S7). For M. galloprovincialis, 6, 10 and 3 genes related to immunity, stress response and shell formation, respectively were detected. For M. edulis, 13, 6 and 4 genes related to immunity, stress response and shell formation, respectively were detected, and for M. coruscus, 10, 5 and 2 genes related to immunity, stress response and shell formation, respectively were detected.

Discussion

Reference genome and whole genome duplication

Mussels are also known as poor man’s shellfish as they are inexpensive and abundant. These features have perhaps contributed to a relative neglect in the investigation of this species’ genomic structural variation, and whether such structural changes can play a significant role in their evolution and ecological adaptations [20]. In the wild, mussels thrive on rocks and stones along the coast, but the majority of mussels consumed are farmed in coastal waters providing food security and employment opportunities to a multitude of fragile coastal communities worldwide [48]. Similarly, to several other molluscs classes, genomic research into M. edulis has been hampered by the lack of a reference genome. This bottleneck is historically linked with the technical difficulties in extracting high molecular weight genomic DNA from Molluscan tissues and thus, allow for long reads sequencing techniques to be successfully applied [20]. In addition, the relatively large genome size and a high level of heterozygosity further complicates the assembly of high-quality reference genomes in the phylum.

With the aim of shedding new light onto the genomic structure and evolution of the class Bivalvia, we sequenced the blue mussel genome, and we introduced the first evidence of WGD events in the Mytilidae family and in Bivalvia more generally. Finally, we identify genes within key physiological pathways under significant positive selection. Taken together, our results provide new insights into the Mytilidae family genome structure and introduce new genomic resources for the investigation of Bivalves evolution, population genetics and for future selective breeding activities. The genome was assembled into 3339 scaffolds with a total length of 1.83 Gb, a GC content of 32.17% and a scaffold N50 of 1.10 Mb. In addition, we found 1.03 Gb (56.33% of the assembly) of repeat content, 69,246 protein-coding genes, 132 rRNAs and a heterozygosity of 0.48% (Table 1). The results are equivalent with the other Mytilus genomes: Genome size between 1.90 Gb and 1.28 Gb, and repetitive sequences between 52.83 and 58.56% [6, 11,12,13]. In addition, transcriptomic data and the derived gene models are comparable with the other available Mytilidae transcriptomes. Phylogeny of the Mytilus (based on the mitochondrial genomes) confirms the position of M. edulis in the genus, with the M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis (sympatric species) separate from M. trossulus and M. coruscus (which group with M. californianus; Fig. 2B).

Our analysis provides, for the first time, genomic evidence for paleopolyploidy in the class Bivalvia. Combining our gene age distribution and phylogenomic analyses, we found evidence for two significant, episodic bursts of gene duplication. While some of these duplication events may be caused by other processes of gene duplication, they are compatible with WGDs observed using similar methods in plants [49] and animals [14, 50]. Ks analysis showed that an ancient WGD event and a more modern WGD event occurred before the divergence of the Bivalvia. This explains why bivalves, and molluscs more generally, present large genomes [20]. The genomic information for M. edulis presented here, will help clarify the evolutionary processes in Bivalvia species and contribute to improving the understanding of the physiological and morphological diversity of Bivalvia species. Our discovery of WGDs in the ancestry of Bivalvia raises questions about the role of gene and genome duplication in their evolution. After duplication, the most likely fate of duplicated genes is the loss of one of the duplicates through non-functionalisation that occurs by accumulation of deleterious mutations [51, 52]. While common after WGD, gene loss could however play a key role in speciation [53], through a process known as divergent resolution [54]. In addition, duplicated genes may also be retained in two copies [55] and either specialise by the partitioning of ancestral gene functions (i.e. sub-functionalisation) or by the acquisition of a novel function (i.e. neo-functionalisation).

Incomplete genetic data (draft genomes and transcriptomes), as well as reduced datasets (Enzymes, RAD, or EST), made it impossible to correctly detect WGDs and duplicated genes in Bivalvia, before now. In the absence of complete genomes and the full picture of WGD events, duplicated sequences are often overlooked or wrongly interpreted. This can lead to artefacts such as high heterozygosity [23], pseudogenes, and a rapid rate of gene acquisition and loss [6]. The discovery of several events of WGD in the Bivalvia phylogeny suggests the prospect that large-scale duplications are consistent with the evolution of novelty and diversity in the physiology of mass spawners like Bivalvia. However, dating of such events remains difficult due to the lack of annotated genomes deeper in the phylogeny, which still is a priority to fully elucidate molluscan evolution.

Identification and functional analysis of positively selected genes

The functional analysis of positively selected orthologs has allowed us to compare our results with studies related to the identification of gene involved in key physiological processes. When identifying gene clusters under positive selection in both species (blue dots in Fig. 4; M. galloprovincialis-M. edulis, M. coruscus-M. edulis, and M. galloprovincialis-M. coruscus), we find the predominant functions for those genes are mainly related to immunity, stress responses and developmental processes. Our results agree with past studies confirming that genes related to immunity are under selection in multiple lineages, likely via adaptive evolution mechanisms linked to host-pathogens co-evolution [15]. The stress response genes presenting positive selection are related or are interacting with Hsp proteins (SIL1 and the archease-like protein). Since the marine environment has considerable concentration of bacteria and viruses, molluscs depend on cellular and molecular mediated immune responses that help them to survive under challenging conditions [56]. That is why filter-feeding animals such as bivalves rely on the intervention of shock proteins which synthesis depends on environmental stressful conditions such as temperature, salinity, hypoxia, heavy metal, and infectious pathogens [57].

Genes presenting intense positive selection in one species but intense purifying selection in the others are of interest because they indicate rapid divergence between species. Once again, the three species have their maximum Ka/Ks values in genes related to developmental processes, immunity, and stress response. Overall, genes identified as being under positive selection in this study, are consistent with the defence system of bivalves depending on the innate immune response against stressful conditions such as environmental stressors, pollution and disease outbreaks.

The identification of all the genes involved in immunity, stress response and shell formation under positive selection in any of the three species (Table S7) has provided us with relevant information that could be used in future studies to identify markers for future comparative physiology and evolution studies. Our results for M. galloprovincialis have shown a considerable amount of stress response proteins (10 proteins) under positive selection compared to the other two species. A significant amount of those stress response genes has documented roles in heat tolerance or direct associations to heat-stress responses, e.g., zinc finger MYM-type protein 2-like (ZMYM2), mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 (MAPK6), heat shock protein 22 (HSPB8). This is also supported by past studies [58, 59] were genomic functions previously linked to divergent temperature adaptation reflected accelerated molecular divergence between warm-adapted M. galloprovincialis and cold-adapted congeners, such as M. edulis. Molecular divergence of M. galloprovincialis is consistent with warm-temperature adaptation demonstrated by physiological studies. M. galloprovincialis also has more positive selection in stress response proteins related to heavy metal detection, transport and metal binding (e.g., arylesterase / paraoxonase, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunit, inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase, Solute carrier family 12), than M. edulis and M. coruscus. M. edulis and M. galloprovincialis presented positively selected shell formation proteins, in the EF-hand domains, which appears to be evolving faster in the two species, albeit in different gene clusters: EF-hand domain protein, EF-Hand, calcium-binding site for M. edulis and EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein for M. galloprovincialis. In bivalves, the Ca2+ binding EF hand domains include a Calmodulin-like protein (CaLP), a multifunctional calcium sensor that belongs to a new member of the CaM (cell adhesion molecules) superfamily, localised in the organic layer sandwiched between nacre and prismatic (aragonite) layer (calcite) in Pinctada fucata [60]. Studies have shown that CalP might be involved in the growth of nacre layer and prismatic layer [61]. Our results suggest and support past studies indicating that closely related bivalves use different secretory repertoires to construct their shell [62] which might lead to positive selection at a gene level as reflected in our results. Also, shell dissolution and decreased shell growth caused by ocean acidification have been described in marine bivalves [63] forcing the need for a fast environmental adaptation. Taking in account current alterations in precipitation patterns as well as stronger and more frequent heat waves and fluctuating sea surface salinities [64], our results suggest that M. galloprovincialis appears to be better equipped than M. edulis and M. coruscus to adapt to higher temperatures, aquatic toxicity, and contamination.

Conclusions

The recruitment, settlement, and grow-out phase of bivalve aquaculture and more precisely, in Mytilus spp. is strongly dependant with the environmental conditions. Therefore, the implications of climate change are not restricted to wild populations. Strong changes in local environmental conditions may limit production and force the relocation of grow-out sites to suitable areas. Thinner and weaker shells will facilitate their rupture during transportation and increase losses due to predation. Genomic selection studies and identification of molecular markers can favour the development of genetically improved lines for multiple traits and facilitate the management of genetic variability. The development of high-quality assembled genomes, as provided by the current research, will favour the identification of genomic regions linked to traits responsible for environmental resilience, which will support the long-term sustainable management and exploitation of the species.

Methods

Material collection

The M. edulis used in this work was obtained from a female adult blue mussel gill tissue from St Andrews Bay (Scotland, UK), a location that previously reported only the presence of a pure M. edulis population [3]. Gill tissue was dissected, stored in 95% ethanol and shipped to Novogene Ltd. (Cambridge, UK) for DNA extraction and sequencing. A sub-sample was tested to confirm the species identification using Wilson et al. [3] test panel and protocol.

Library construction and sequencing

High-quality DNA was used for subsequent library preparation and sequencing using both the PromethION and Illumina platforms at Novogen UK (Novogene UK Company Ltd., UK). To obtain long non-fragmented sequence reads, 15 μg of genomic DNA was sheared and size-selected (30–80 kb) with a BluePippin and a 0.50% agarose Gel cassette (Sage Science, USA). The selected fragments were processed using the Ligation Sequencing 1D Kit (Oxford Nanopore, UK) as directed by the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced using the PromethION DNA sequencer (Oxford Nanopore, UK) for 48 h. For the estimation and correction of genome assembly, an Illumina DNA paired-end library with an insert size of 350 bp was built in compliance with the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina Inc., USA) with paired-end 150 nt read layout.

RNA isolation, cDNA library construction and sequencing

The total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The preparation and sequencing reactions of cDNA library were done by Novogene Ltd. Briefly, the poly (A) messenger RNA was isolated from the total RNA with oligo (dT) attached magnetic beads (Illumina Inc., USA). Fragmentation was carried out using divalent cations under elevated temperature in Illumina proprietary fragmentation buffer. Double-stranded complimentary DNAs (cDNAs) were synthesised, and sequencing adaptors were ligated according to the Illumina manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina Inc., USA). After purification with AMPureXP beads, the ligated products were amplified to generate high quality cDNA libraries. The cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform (Illumina Inc., USA) with paired-end reads of 150 nucleotides.

Genome assembly

Reads from the two types of sequencing libraries were used independently during assembly stages. Long-reads were filtered for length (> 5000 nt) and complexity (entropy over 15), while all short reads were filtered for quality (QC > 25), length (150 nt), absence of primers / adaptors and complexity (entropy over 15) using fastp v0.20.1 [65]. Using Jellyfish v2.3.0 [66], the frequency of 17-mers and 23-mers in the Illumina filtered data was calculated with a 1 bp sliding window [67] to evaluate genome size. Long-reads were then assembled using wtdbg2 v2.5 [68] which uses fuzzy Bruijn graph as well as raven v1.5.0 [69]. As it assembles raw reads without error correction and then creates a consensus from the intermediate assembly outputs, several error corrections, gap closing, and polishing steps have been implemented. The initial outputs have been combined using Quickmerge v0.3 [70]. The combined output was re-aligned to the long-read and polished using Minimap2 v2.17 [71] and Racon v1.4.3 [72], first with filtered reads, to bridge potential gaps, then with the filtered reads to correct for error. Finally, Pilon v1.23 [73] was used to polish and correct for sequencing error using the short-reads. The redundant contigs due to diploidy were reduced by aligning the long reads back to the assembly with Minimap2 v2.17 [71] and by passing the alignment through the Purge Haplotigs pipeline v1.1.1 [74]. This reduced the artefact scaffolds and created the final haploid representation of the genome. Scaffolds were ordered with Medusa v1.6 [75] using M. galloprovincialis [6, 11] and M. coruscus [12] genome scaffolds. Mitochondrial genome was annotated using MITOS r999 [76] and manually curated.

Repeat sequences

The transposable elements were annotated using a de novo prediction using RepeatModeler v2.0.1 [77] and LTR-Finder v1.07 [78]. The repetitive sequences yielded from these two programs were combined into a non-redundant repeat sequence library. With this library, the M. edulis genome was scanned using RepeatMasker v4.10 [79] for the representative sequences.

Gene models

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reads of poor quality i.e. with an average quality score less than 20) or displaying ambiguous bases or too short and PCR duplicates were discarded using fastp v0.20.1 [65]. Ribosomal RNA was further removed using SortMeRNA v3.0.2 [80] against the Silva version 119 rRNA databases [81]. The cleaned RNA-seq reads were pooled and mapped to the genome using the using HiSat2 v2.2.0 [82]. A combined approach that integrates ab initio gene prediction and RNA-seq-based prediction was used to annotate the protein-coding genes in M. edulis genome. We used Braker v2.1.5 [83] to make de novo gene predictions. The accuracy and sensitivity of the predicted model was improved by applying iterative self-training with transcripts. The predicted coding sequences were been annotated using the InterProscan v5.46–81.0 [84, 85], Swiss-Prot release 2020_02 [86] and Pfam release 33.1 [87] databases. For classification, the transcripts were handled as queries using Blast+/BlastP v2.10.0 [88], E-value threshold of 10− 5, against Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) r94.1 [89]. Gene Ontology [90] was recovered from the annotations of InterPro, KEGG and SwissProt. Subsequently, the classification was performed using R v4.0.0 [91] and the Venn diagram was produced by jvenn [92]. The completeness of gene regions was further tested using BUSCO v4.0.2 [93] with a Metazoa (release 10) benchmark of 954 conserved Metazoa genes.

Phylogenetic tree

Concatenated alignments constructed from all mitochondrial shared CDS sequences were used to construct a phylogenetic tree. Sequences were aligned using MACSE v10.02 [94]. A Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree was inferred under the GTR model with gamma-distributed rate variation (Γ) and a proportion of invariable sites (I) using a relaxed (uncorrelated log-normal) molecular clock in RAxML v8.2.12 [95].

Calculating Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values

Complete annotated nuclear genomes of Bivalvia (class) were collected. Blast+/BlastP v2.10.0 [88] was used to search for duplicated sequences in protein-coding genes between each genome. Duplicate pairs were identified as sequences that demonstrated over 70% sequence similarity, mutual protein coverage > 80%, protein length > 30 amino-acid from an all-against-all search. Duplicated sequences were aligned accounting for codon and coding frame, using MACSE v10.02 [94]. Finally, the Ka (number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site) and Ks (number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site) for each pair was calculated using an MPI version of KaKs_Calculator [96] under the MLPB model [97]. The Ks values > 5.0 were excluded from further analysis due to the saturated substitutions at synonymous sites. Univariate mixture models were fitted to the distributions of Ks by expectation maximisation that uses the finite mixture expectation maximisation algorithm [29, 98].

Estimation of evolution rates

A set of core-orthologs was constructed from the three complete annotated nuclear genomes of Mytilinae (subfamily), M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis [6] and M. coruscus [12] and were used to identity cluster of orthologous genes with a 1:1:1 ratio. Ka and Ks estimation were reported pairwise between species after MACSE v10.02 [94] and KaKs_Calculator [96] under the MLPB model [97] as above.

From a literature search of comparative mussel biology studies, we identified genes relevant to core physiological functions, specifically immunity, stress response and shell formation. Subsequently, a local BLAST search was conducted on NCBI to identify the genes of interest in the available genomes of the three species with a cut-off point of 80% sequences similarity.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequencing reads of all libraries are available from EBI/ENA via the accession numbers ERR4296957-ERR4296958 (long reads), ERR4296954-ERR4296955 (short reads) and ERR4172341 (RNA-seq). The assembled genome (MEDL1; GCA_905397895.1) is available in EBI with the accession numbers ERS4576331, project PRJEB38403.

Abbreviations

cDNA :

Complimentary DNA

CDS :

Coding DNA Sequence

EBI :

European Bioinformatics Institute

GO :

Gene Ontology

GTR :

General Time-Reversible model

Ka :

Non-synonymous mutation rate

KEGG :

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Ks :

Synonymous mutation rate

ML :

Maximum Likelihood

NCBI :

National Center for Biotechnology Information

RAD :

Restriction site associated DNA

RNA-seq :

RNA-sequencing

SNP :

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

WGD :

Whole Genome Duplication

References

  1. Riginos C, Cunningham CW. Local adaptation and species segregation in two mussel (Mytilus edulis × Mytilus trossulus) hybrid zones. Mol Ecol. 2004;14:381–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gosling EM. Systematics and geographic distribution of Mytilus. Dev Aquac Fish Sci. 1992;25:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson J, Matejusova I, McIntosh RE, Carboni S, Bekaert M. New diagnostic SNP molecular markers for the Mytilus species complex. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200654.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. El Ayari T, Trigui El Menif N, Hamer B, Cahill AE, Bierne N. The hidden side of a major marine biogeographic boundary: a wide mosaic hybrid zone at the Atlantic-Mediterranean divide reveals the complex interaction between natural and genetic barriers in mussels. Heredity. 2019;122:770–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gosling EM. Speciation and species concepts in the marine environment. In: Beaumont AR, editor. Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. London: Chapman and Hall; 1994. p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerdol M, Moreira R, Cruz F, Gómez-Garrido J, Vlasova A, Rosani U, et al. Massive gene presence-absence variation shapes an open pan-genome in the Mediterranean mussel. Genome Biol. 2020;21:275.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman AS, Byers JE. Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations. Science. 2006;313:831–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Modak TH, Literman R, Puritz JB, Johnson KM, Roberts EM, Proestou D, et al. Extensive genome-wide duplications in the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021;376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0164.

  9. Sun S, Li Q, Kong L, Yu H. Limited locomotive ability relaxed selective constraints on molluscs mitochondrial genomes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10628.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sigwart JDD, Lindberg DRR, Chen C, Sun J. Molluscan phylogenomics requires strategically selected genomes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021;376:20200161.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murgarella M, Puiu D, Novoa B, Figueras A, Posada D, Canchaya C. A first insight into the genome of the filter-feeder mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151561.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li R, Zhang W, Lu J, Zhang Z, Mu C, Song W, et al. The whole-genome sequencing and hybrid assembly of Mytilus coruscus. Front Genet. 2020;11:440.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J-L, Feng D-D, Liu J, Xu J-K, Chen K, Li Y-F, et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the hard-shelled mussel Mytilus coruscus , a widely distributed species from the temperate areas of East Asia. Gigascience. 2021;10:giab024.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berthelot C, Brunet F, Chalopin D, Juanchich A, Bernard M, Noël B, et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3657.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliver TA, Garfield DA, Manier MK, Haygood R, Wray GA, Palumbi SR. Whole-genome positive selection and habitat-driven evolution in a shallow and a deep-sea urchin. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:800–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dean AM, Thornton JW. Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:675–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Storz JF, Bridgham JT, Kelly SA, Garland T. Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2015;309:R197–214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Linnen CR, Kingsley EP, Jensen JD, Hoekstra HE. On the origin and spread of an adaptive allele in deer mice. Science. 2009;325:1095–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Natarajan C, Hoffmann FG, Lanier HC, Wolf CJ, Cheviron ZA, Spangler ML, et al. Intraspecific polymorphism, interspecific divergence, and the origins of function-altering mutations in deer mouse hemoglobin. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:978–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davison A, Neiman M. Pearls of wisdom-a Theo murphy issue on molluscan genomics. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021;376. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0151.

  21. Regan T, Bean TP, Ellis T, Davie A, Carboni S, Migaud H, et al. Genetic improvement technologies to support the sustainable growth of UK aquaculture. Rev Aquac. 2021;13:1958–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Benadelmouna A, Saunier A, Ledu C, Travers M-A, Morga B. Genomic abnormalities affecting mussels (Mytilus edulis-galloprovincialis) in France are related to ongoing neoplastic processes, evidenced by dual flow cytometry and cell monolayer analyses. J Invertebr Pathol. 2018;157:45–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vendrami DLJ, De Noia M, Telesca L, Brodte E-M, Hoffman JI. Genome-wide insights into introgression and its consequences for genome-wide heterozygosity in the Mytilus species complex across Europe. Evol Appl. 2020;13:2130–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coolen JWP, Boon AR, Crooijmans R, Pelt H, Kleissen F, Gerla D, et al. Marine stepping-stones: connectivity of Mytilus edulis populations between offshore energy installations. Mol Ecol. 2020;29:686–703.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Boore JL, Medina M, Rosenberg LA. Complete sequences of the highly rearranged molluscan mitochondrial genomes of the Scaphopod Graptacme eborea and the bivalve Mytilus edulis. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:1492–503.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Breton S, Burger G, Stewart DT, Blier PU. Comparative analysis of gender-associated complete mitochondrial genomes in marine mussels (Mytilus spp.). Genetics. 2006;172:1107–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee Y, Kwak H, Shin J, Kim S-C, Kim T, Park J-K. A mitochondrial genome phylogeny of Mytilidae (Bivalvia: Mytilida). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019;139:106533.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi T, Huang H, Barker MS. Ancient genome duplications during the evolution of kiwifruit (Actinidia) and related Ericales. Ann Bot. 2010;106:497–504.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiley GP, Barker MS, Burleigh JG. Assessing the performance of Ks plots for detecting ancient whole genome duplications. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:2882–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Capt C, Bouvet K, Guerra D, Robicheau BM, Stewart DT, Pante E, et al. Unorthodox features in two venerid bivalves with doubly uniparental inheritance of mitochondria. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1087.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fu X, Sun Y, Wang J, Xing Q, Zou J, Li R, et al. Sequencing-based gene network analysis provides a core set of gene resource for understanding thermal adaptation in Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14:184–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi X, Xiang S, Cao J, Zhu H, Yang B, He Q, et al. Kelch-like proteins: physiological functions and relationships with diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2019;148:104404.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zanchetta ME, Meroni G. Emerging roles of the TRIM E3 ubiquitin ligases MID1 and MID2 in cytokinesis. Front Physiol. 2019;10:274.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown RE, Mattjus P. Glycolipid transfer proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2007;1771:746–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Le LTHL, Yoo W, Jeon S, Kim KK, Kim TD. Characterization and immobilization of a novel SGNH family esterase (LaSGNH1) from lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;21:91.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sui Y-P, Liu X-B, Chai L-Q, Wang J-X, Zhao X-F. Characterization and influences of classical insect hormones on the expression profiles of a molting carboxypeptidase a from the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera). Insect Mol Biol. 2009;18:353–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang X, Chen W, Gao Q, Yang J, Yan X, Zhao H, et al. Rapamycin directly activates lysosomal mucolipin TRP channels independent of mTOR. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000252.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Radzisheuskaya A, Shliaha PV, Grinev VV, Shlyueva D, Damhofer H, Koche R, et al. Complex-dependent histone acetyltransferase activity of KAT8 determines its role in transcription and cellular homeostasis. Mol Cell. 2021;81:1749–65 e8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Carr S, Penfold CN, Bamford V, James R, Hemmings AM. The structure of TolB, an essential component of the Tol-dependent translocation system, and its protein–protein interaction with the translocation domain of colicin E9. Structure. 2000;8:57–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nie H, Wang H, Jiang K, Yan X. Transcriptome analysis reveals differential immune related genes expression in Ruditapes philippinarum under hypoxia stress: potential HIF and NF-κB crosstalk in immune responses in clam. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:318.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gerdol M, Venier P. An updated molecular basis for mussel immunity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;46:17–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Auxilien S, El Khadali F, Rasmussen A, Douthwaite S, Grosjean H. Archease from Pyrococcus abyssi improves substrate specificity and solubility of a tRNA m5C methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:18711–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mao G, Wang R, Guan Y, Liu Y, Zhang S. Sulfurtransferases 1 and 2 play essential roles in embryo and seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:7548–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stoeckler JD, Poirot AF, Smith RM, Parks RE, Ealick SE, Takabayashi K, et al. Purine nucleoside phosphorylase. 3. Reversal of purine base specificity by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1997;36:11749–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Koster KP. AMPAR palmitoylation tunes synaptic strength: implications for synaptic plasticity and disease. J Neurosci. 2019;39:5040–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Green TJ, Rolland J-L, Vergnes A, Raftos D, Montagnani C. OsHV-1 countermeasures to the Pacific oyster’s anti-viral response. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;47:435–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pérez-Parallé ML, Carpintero P, Pazos AJ, Abad M, Sánchez JL. The HOX gene cluster in the bivalve mollusc Mytilus galloprovincialis. Biochem Genet. 2005;43:417–24.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Smaal AC, Ferreira JG, Grant J, Petersen JK, Strand Ø. Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Badouin H, Gouzy J, Grassa CJ, Murat F, Staton SE, Cottret L, et al. The sunflower genome provides insights into oil metabolism, flowering and Asterid evolution. Nature. 2017;546:148–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22380.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Z, Tiley GP, Galuska SR, Reardon CR, Kidder TI, Rundell RJ, et al. Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:4713–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK. Probability of fixation and mean fixation time of an overdominant mutation. Genetics. 1973;74:371–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Takahata N, Maruyama T. Polymorphism and loss of duplicate gene expression: a theoretical study with application of tetraploid fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1979;76:4521–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lynch M. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000;290:1151–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Taylor JS, Van de Peer Y, Meyer A. Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends Genet. 2001;17:299–301.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1970.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Pourmozaffar S, Tamadoni Jahromi S, Rameshi H, Sadeghi A, Bagheri T, Behzadi S, et al. The role of salinity in physiological responses of bivalves. Rev Aquac. 2020;12:1548–66.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wan Q, Whang I, Lee J. Molecular and functional characterization of HdHSP20: a biomarker of environmental stresses in disk abalone Haliotis discus discus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012;33:48–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Saarman NP, Kober KM, Simison WB, Pogson GH. Sequence-based analysis of thermal adaptation and protein energy landscapes in an invasive bluemussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis). Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:2739–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Popovic I, Riginos C. Comparative genomics reveals divergent thermal selection in warm- and cold-tolerant marine mussels. Mol Ecol. 2020;29:519–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yan Z, Fang Z, Ma Z, Deng J, Li S, Xie L, et al. Biomineralization: functions of calmodulin-like protein in the shell formation of pearl oyster. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2007;1770:1338–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Feng D, Li Q, Yu H, Kong L, Du S. Identification of conserved proteins from diverse shell matrix proteome in Crassostrea gigas: Characterization of genetic bases regulating shell formation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Peterson KJ, Cotton JA, Gehling JG, Pisani D. The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2008;363:1435–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Melzner F, Stange P, Trübenbach K, Thomsen J, Casties I, Panknin U, et al. Food supply and seawater pCO2 impact calcification and internal shell dissolution in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24223.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Steeves LE, Filgueira R, Guyondet T, Chassé J, Comeau L. Past, present, and future: performance of two bivalve species under changing environmental conditions. Front Mar Sci. 2018;5:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Marçais G, Kingsford C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:764–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Vurture GW, Sedlazeck FJ, Nattestad M, Underwood CJ, Fang H, Gurtowski J, et al. GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2202–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ruan J, Li H. Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat Methods. 2020;17:155–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vaser R, Šikić M. Raven: a de novo genome assembler for long reads. bioRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.242461.

  70. Solares EA, Chakraborty M, Miller DE, Kalsow S, Hall K, Perera AG, et al. Rapid low-cost assembly of the drosophila melanogaster reference genome using low-coverage, long-read sequencing. G3 (Bethesda). 2018;8:3143–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–100.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vaser R, Sović I, Nagarajan N, Šikić M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 2017;27:737–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112963.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Roach MJ, Schmidt SA, Borneman AR. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19:460.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bosi E, Donati B, Galardini M, Brunetti S, Sagot MF, Lió P, et al. MeDuSa: a multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2443–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, et al. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:313–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Flynn JM, Hubley R, Goubert C, Rosen J, Clark AG, Feschotte C, et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:9451–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:637–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D590–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:907–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Hoff KJ, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M, Stanke M. Whole-genome annotation with BRAKER. In: Kollmar M, editor. Gene prediction: methods and protocols. New York: Springer New York; 2019. p. 65–95.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Blum M, Bork P, Bridge A, et al. InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D351–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Bateman A, Martin MJ, O’Donovan C, Magrane M, Alpi E, Antunes R, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D158–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A, Potter SC, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D427–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D590–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/75556.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna; 2021. https://www.r-project.org/.

  92. Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudié F, Djemiel C, Klopp C. jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:293. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Ranwez V, Harispe S, Delsuc F, Douzery EJP. MACSE: multiple alignment of coding SEquences accounting for frameshifts and stop codons. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22594.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang Z, Li J, Zhao X-Q, Wang J, Wong GK-S, Yu J. KaKs_Calculator: Calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006;4:259–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Tzeng Y-H. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:2290–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Benaglia T, Chauveau D, Hunter DR, Young D. mixtools: an R package for analyzing finite mixture models. J Stat Softw. 2009;32:1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A special thank you goes to Dr. Nick Lake and Dr. Eleanor Adamson and to the team at Novogene Ltd. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Funding

The NERC SUPER Doctoral Training Program, Fishmongers’ Company, Association of Scottish Shellfish Growers, the Sustainable Aquaculture Innovation Centre, and the University of Stirling funded this work. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK

    Ana Corrochano-Fraile, Andrew Davie, Stefano Carboni & Michaël Bekaert

  2. International Marine Centre, Loc. Sa Mardini snc, 09170, Torre Grande, OR, Italy

    Stefano Carboni

Authors
  1. Ana Corrochano-Fraile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Davie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefano Carboni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michaël Bekaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.C. sourced the funding, co-developed the conceptual idea, supervised the findings of this work and edited the manuscript. M.B. co-developed the concept with S.C., curated all the computational and bioinformatics elements of the study and edited the manuscript. A.C.F. sourced and prepared the biological material, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and conducted the functional analysis of all orthologs, A.D. extracted the RNA and edited the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Carboni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was approved by the University of Stirling Ethics Committee (Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board). Animal handling and collection in this study was carried out following its approved guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The k-mer distribution used for the estimation of genome size. The heterozygous and homozygous peaks of k-mer depth are clearly markers, suggesting a high-complexity genome. A The 17-mer distribution. Predicted genome size, 1,010,184,781 nt; B The 23-mer distribution. Predicted genome size, 1,096,306,163 nt. Table S1. Sequencing data, summary statistics. _ Estimation based on M. galloprovincialis and M. coruscus genomes size. Table S2. RepeatMasker statistics. _ repeats fragmented by insertions or deletions have been counted as one element. y LTR Finder results: 255,413 LTR pairs over 4932 regions and 151,703,353 bp. Table S3. Summary of annotation results for M. edulis gene models using a range of databases. _InterPro covers 12 databases (CDD-3.17,Coils-2.2.1, Gene3D-4.2.0, Hamap-2020 01, MobiDBLite-2.0, PANTHER-14.1, PRINTS-42.0, ProSitePatterns-2019 11, ProSitePro_les-2019 11, SFLD-4, SMART-7.1, SUPERFAMILY-1.75, TIGRFAM-15.0). Table S4. Mytilinae (subfamily) mitochondrial genomes. Table S5. Bivalvia (class) genome where Ka & Ks estimations were possible: All exhibit evidences of _-WGD and _-WGD. _ this study. Table S6. Bivalvia (class) genome and availability of gene models and annotations. _ this study. Table S7. Genes involved in immunity, stress response and shell formation under positive selection in M. galloprovincialis, M. edulis and M. coruscus.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corrochano-Fraile, A., Davie, A., Carboni, S. et al. Evidence of multiple genome duplication events in Mytilus evolution. BMC Genomics 23, 340 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08575-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08575-9

Keywords

  • Mytilus edulis
  • Whole-genome duplication
  • Evolution
  • Positive selection
  • Paleogenomics

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us