Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcriptomic and genomic analysis provides new insights in molecular and genetic processes involved in zucchini ZYMV tolerance

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 371 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cucurbita pepo is highly susceptible to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) and the resistance found in several wild species cannot be considered as complete or broad-spectrum resistance. In this study, a source of tolerance introgressed in C. pepo (381e) from C. moschata, in True French (TF) background, was investigated 12 days post-inoculation (DPI) at transcriptomic and genomic levels.

Results

The comparative RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) of TF (susceptible to ZYMV) and 381e (tolerant to ZYMV) allowed the evaluation of about 33,000 expressed transcripts and the identification of 146 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in 381e, mainly involved in photosynthesis, transcription, cytoskeleton organization and callose synthesis. By contrast, the susceptible cultivar TF triggered oxidative processes related to response to biotic stimulus and activated key regulators of plant virus intercellular movement. In addition, the discovery of variants located in transcripts allowed the identification of two chromosome regions rich in Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), putatively introgressed from C. moschata, containing genes exclusively expressed in 381e.

Conclusion

381e transcriptome analysis confirmed a global improvement of plant fitness by reducing the virus titer and movement. Furthermore, genes implicated in ZYMV tolerance in C. moschata introgressed regions were detected. Our work provides new insight into the plant virus recovery process and a better understanding of the molecular basis of 381e tolerance.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cucurbita pepo is a high polymorphic species, including economically important crops grown worldwide. This species is highly susceptible to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV), a quickly spread aphid-borne potyvirus, leading to leaf yellowing and deformations, stunting and fruit defects [1,2,3]. To date, no sources of resistance to ZYMV have been found in this species, though in many areas the pathogen represents one of the most severe threats limiting crop production.

A wide range of ZYMV resistant genetic resources was found in other Cucurbita species [4, 5]. Several C. moschata accessions carrying resistance genes to ZYMV were identified: Nigerian local carrying Zym0 and Zym4 resistance gene [6]; Menina and Bolina possessing a resistance gene named Zym1 [7]; Soler accession containing the recessive gene zym6 [8] and Otto cultivar carrying four genes [9].

The genetic inheritance of tolerance to ZYMV derived from Menina in the C. pepo background showed that Zym1 could interact with minor genes able to modulate the defense response [6, 10]. Recently, Capuozzo et al. [11] investigated Zym1 segregation in different C. pepo populations. Genetic analysis for tolerance to ZYMV at both the phenotypic and genotypic levels clearly indicated that a major gene, Zym1, is essential for a tolerance expression in the 381e genotype background. Still, putative additional genes with additive or epistatic effects may mitigate or delay the symptoms. Pachner et al. reported that the combined deployment of seven genes in C. pepo would be required for maximal expression of ZYMV tolerance [12]. The involvement of putative modifying minor genes made difficult the understanding of genetic control and the subsequent transfer of ZYMV tolerance in breeding lines. In addition, the tolerant cultivar 381e when challenged with ZYMV showed a symptomatic systemic infection 4 days after inoculation (DPI) and a plant recovery, characterized by the emergence of newly developing leaves, about 12 DPI that can hamper genetic analysis [10].

Cucurbit genomic analysis and comparative gene expression analysis emerged as very useful tools for overcoming difficulties related to the introgression of desirable traits and for dissecting the molecular basis of host tolerance [13,14,15]. A reference zucchini genome version 4.1 (BGV004370) was recently provided, and several next-generation sequencing technologies, such as RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq), have been explored for C. pepo [16,17,18,19]. To date, RNA-seq technology provides new opportunities for mapping and quantifying transcripts by creating new chances for the comprehension of loci, genes, and pathways activated during plant-pathogen interaction.

The main goal of this work was to investigate zucchini tolerance to ZYMV through genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the susceptible cultivar True French (TF) and a tolerant derived cultivar 381e. The modulation of gene expression in virus-infected plants was assessed at 12 DPI to highlight key genes activated in the plant recovering process in the tolerant accession. In addition, genomic scanning was performed to identify the candidate genes involved in ZYMV tolerance in C. moschata introgressed regions.

Results

C. pepo transcriptional profile upon ZYMV inoculation

The transcriptomic reprogramming of two zucchini isogenic cultivars (TF and derived ZYMV tolerant 381e) inoculated with ZYMV was evaluated by analyzing 33,388 genes expressed at 12 DPI. In TF-ZYMV interaction, transcriptome variation resulted in 19,241 expressed genes. As for the cultivar 381e, 18,425 transcripts were observed upon inoculation with ZYMV (Fig. 1). Exclusively expressed genes in 381e (360) were more than three times less than TF (1,176). Up to 6,382 transcripts out of 18,065 were differentially expressed in both cultivars, 147 were differentially expressed in 381e and 366 in TF (Fig. 1). Among the 3,681 up-regulated genes, 147 were exclusive of 381e, suggesting an important role in recovery during virus infection. DEGs identified in virus-challenged transcriptomes were further investigated to evaluate their implication in fundamental biological processes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Transcriptional Profile. A Total Expressed Genes in C. pepo 381e (blue), TF (orange) and overlapped genes (violet). In parenthesis, differentially expressed genes for each area of the Venn diagram

Full size image

Overview of cellular processes activated in the tolerant and susceptible cultivars

The identification of challenged processes after infection with ZYMV can help the understanding of tolerance response. According to the phenotypic recovery observed at 12 DPI, the tolerant cultivar 381e restored the main cellular activities (transcription, protein translation, photosynthesis, metabolites biosynthesis and the general cellular organization), which belonged to 139 GO term enriched categories [20]. Up-regulated genes in 381e were enriched in GO categories “photosynthesis” including 136 genes, "generation of metabolite and energy" and "photosynthesis, light reaction" including 190 and 77 genes, respectively (Fig. 2A). Most of these genes had a high LogFC (Cup000018g017445.1, LogFC = 2,32) and could be involved in the ZYMV recovery process.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The top ten significantly enriched GO among all enriched GO child-terms (secondary level terms) starting from the root term biological process (GO:0,008,150). A Enriched GO terms for up-regulated genes in 381e and B) Enriched GO terms for up-regulated genes in TF. The categories size is related to LOG10 FDR of enriched GOs

Full size image

By contrast, the susceptible cultivar TF showed 32 overrepresented GO terms, mainly involving receptors for biotic stress response, enzymes for ROS production, peptide degradation and lipid oxidation (Fig. 2B).

The plant vegetative restoring in 381e is promoted by increased photosynthetic activity through the up-regulation of genes involved in the formation of the photosystems (i.e., Cup000001g001195.1), in the electron transport chain and membrane transporters. In addition, genes directly associated with mitochondrial activity, glycolysis process (PEP, Acetyl-CoA, GAPDH, Hexokinaes), phospholipids synthesis (CDP-alcohol phosphatidyltransferase) and shikimic acid network synthesis were strongly up-regulated in 381e, suggesting an enhanced photo-respiratory activity. A strong up-regulation of genes involved in helicase activity, including DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicases, DNA replication licensing factor, such as the exclusively expressed Cup000013g012986.1, and two DNA-binding protein (Cup000085g037850.1 and Cup000022g020052.1) was observed in 381e. Moreover, several Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) proteins were found differentially regulated in both cultivars. In particular, 381e activated HSP 90–5 (Cup001195g045603.1), potentially involved in the transport of newly synthesized proteins from ribosomes to chloroplasts, and HSP-70 (Cup000010g010288.1), involved in proteins trafficking through the chloroplast membrane to stroma in cooperation with 14–3-3 protein (Cup000060g034360.1), that in this study also resulted overexpressed [21]. Furthermore, seven aquaporin membrane transporters (i.e. Cup000679g045055.1) resulted strongly up-regulated in 381e(LogFC > 1).

By contrast, TF showed a high activation of genes involved in the chloroplast architecture (i.e., Cup000003g002638.1) and oxygen scavenging, such as two L-ascorbate peroxidases (Cup000004g003828.1 and Cup000052g032798.1) belonging to "reactive oxygen species" GO term (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, we also found the up-regulation of catalases and superoxide dismutases (i.e., Cup000032g025333.1) and a protein ridA (Cup000182g042991.1) involved in response to BCAT3 (Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase 3) that is produced in response to stress. Interestingly, we found the up-regulation of several cytochromes type p450 associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and involved in the metabolism of chemical compounds extraneous to the organism. A cytochrome CYP82C2 (Cup000001g001147.1), directly involved in the jasmonic acid network synthesis, was highly expressed, suggesting that the plant defense system was still alerted [22]. In addition, two Synaptotagmins and SNAP receptors (Cup000004g004336.1, Cup000029g023659.1, Cup000011g011417.1), belonging to the "Response to other organisms" GO term, resulted up-regulated and exclusively expressed in TF (Fig. 2B).

In our study, 29 serine/threonine protein kinases resulted up-regulated in 381e while 42 were up-regulated in TF. Among these, 22 were localized on the plasma membrane. In addition, TF differentially expressed several genes involved in the cell wall degradation (i.e., pectinesterases, beta-glucosidases and xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases), indicating the collapse of the primaries structure of the plants. On the other hand, it is interesting to note that genes involved in cytoskeleton organization (Cup000006g006297.1), in glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis (Cup000019g017783.1) as well as two Rab GTPases (Cup000067g035924.1 and Cup000038g027690.1) and a gene having a crucial role in the callose synthesis (Cup000021g019191.1) resulted exclusively up-regulated in 381e.

Genomic localization of transcript variants

In order to identify putative genomic regions introgressed into C. pepo from C. moschata cv. Menina, we performed a variant calling in both the near-isogenic cultivars, TF and 381e was conducted.

A total of 150,605 high-quality small variants, including SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) and InDels (insertions/insertions/deletions), were mapped to the C. pepo BGV004370 reference genome (Fig. 3, Additional Table 1) [16]. The number of common small variants in 381e and TF was normalized with respect to the LG (Linkage Group) length (Fig. 3). In 381e, on average, eight variants were mapped for expressed locus, on LGs 01 and 08, while in TF two variants per transcript were found on such LGs (Additional Table 2). About 30% of small variants identified in 381e mapped on two LGs, while in TF the percentage of variants on the same LGs was close to 13% (Additional Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 3). A close-up view of LGs 01 and 08 of the two C. pepo cultivars showed that the 20% (16,891) of small variants identified in 381e were concentrated in two short regions of LGs 01 and 08, while in TF less than 3% (1,410) were mapped in the same areas (Fig. 4). In 381e, over 65% (10,321) of small variants identified on LG 01 were located on a genomic region of about 4 Mb, while on LG 08, the second putative introgression region of 3,5 Mb showed 82% (6,570) of total variants. Interestingly, Capuozzo et al. mapped, on the same LG 08 region, the marker (SNP1) associated with ZYMV tolerance in 381e (Fig. 4 and Additional Table 2) [11].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Circos plot integrating the genomic positions of ZYMV-related markers, pathogen recognition genes and small variants (SNP, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and InDel: insertion/deletion). Inset legend provides information for the data rings. Track A denotes the 20 pseudochromosomes (LG, linkage group) of Cucurbita pepo. The length of each circle segment represents the size of pseudochromosomes expressed in megabases (Mb). An orange arrow indicated the marker associated with ZYMV tolerance identified by Capuozzo et al. [11]. Track B shows, as a scatterplot, the genomic position of nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing receptors (NLR; blue spots) and receptor-like proteins and receptor-like kinase (PPR; green spots), annotated by Andolfo et al. [19]. Tracks C and D show the variants density, represented as heat maps (number/Mb) in C. pepo 381e and C. pepo TF cultivars, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

High-resolution map integrating genomic and genetic marker informations. The genomic position of six coding DNA fragments (CDFs) and two CAPS markers (LG01SNP1 and LG08SNP4) is indicated. The distribution of small variants along 1 and 8 pseudochromosomes is reported in red (381e) and in blue (TF)

Full size image

Variants validation and marker-phenotype correlation

Molecular validation was performed to confirm the DNA variants identified on putative introgression regions located on LG 01 and LG 08. A total of six coding DNA fragments (CDFs), located on two genomic regions inherited from C. moschata, were sequenced and analyzed (Fig. 4). About 70 SNPs, annotated into the six CDFs, were confirmed from Sanger sequencing (Additional Table 3). Two high confidence variants (LG08SNP4 and LG01SNP1) were converted in CAPS markers (Additional Table 3; Additional Fig. 1) to conduct a marker-phenotype correlation analysis. LG08SNP4 was physically close (~ 2 Mb) to the previously mapped "SNP1" and exhibited a very high correlation coefficient (Pearson test p-value < 0,01; r = 0,991) with phenotypic data [11]. In particular, marker correlation with ZYMV-resistance or susceptibility traits was in accordance for 73 genotypes out of 82 genotypes analyzed. A good correlation coefficient with phenotypic results was displayed also by LG01SNP1 (r = 0,827; Pearson test p-value < 0,05). In addition, an interesting correlation (r = 0,895; Pearson test p-value < 0,05) was identified between the markers LG01SNP1 and LG08SNP4, located on chromosome 1 and 8, respectively.

Discussion

From its first report in the late 1970s, ZYMV continued its worldwide expansion, causing several yield losses in cucurbits. This work explored the molecular basis of ZYMV tolerance identified in Cucurbita moschata cv Menina, analyzing the derived C. pepo tolerant cv 381e and its susceptible counterpart TF through an integrated transcriptomic and genomic experiment. Though C. moschata is sparingly cross-fertile with C. pepo, the gene expression may be hampered in new genomic background [6]. In addition, approximately 12 days after ZYMV inoculation, 381e plants showed a vegetative recovery [10], while damaged TF plants displayed yellowing of foliage, internodes shortening and leaf deformations.

In our study, an opposite response to infection was clearly observed at 12 DPI, in terms of expressed and differentially regulated genes between the two analyzed genotypes. The most represented GO categories in 381e emphasized the recovery process mediated by increased photosynthetic activity and general cell restoring. For instance, in "photosynthesis", "generation of precursor metabolites and energy" and "photosynthesis, light reaction" GO terms were included genes with high LogFC (Cup000018g017445.1, LogFC = 2,32; Cup000025g021749.1, LogFC = 1,83 and Cup000010g010661.1, LogFC = 1,02). By contrast, among down-regulated genes exclusively expressed in TF, Cup000011g011417.1 (LogFC = -1,19) belonged to the GO term "Response to other organisms" and could be involved in TF-ZYMV susceptibility.

ZYMV virus usually takes about nine days to infect the plant systemically through the phloem [23] and the early systemic infection of 381e, about 4 DPI, could prompt a plant recovery. At the initial stage of infection, the plant moderates its immune response and general fitness, triggering a decrease in symptoms of viral infection [24]. The 381e physiological perturbations imposed various constraints to face virus, limiting the synthesis of host proteins essential for replication and movement. Tolerant plants react to virus infection through changes in physiological and developmental processes to reduce the synthesis of factors required for virus multiplication [25,26,27]. We found several DEAD-box RNA helicases and DNA helicases, such as Cup000013g012986.1, up-regulated in 381e. In particular, Cup000013g012986.1 belonged to "DNA unwinding during replication" GO category (supplementary material 4). DEAD-box RNA helicases can function as viral RNA sensors or effectors by blocking virus replication. RH30 (Dead-box helicase) was required to restrict Bushy Stunt Virus (TBSV) replication in tomato [28]. Moreover, RNA and DNA helicases can also positively affect stress tolerance [29]. A general gene down-regulation could be useful to impede virus movement and replication, leading to a less virus titer and promoting a consequent plant recovery [23]. By contrast, the up-regulation of factors correlated with transcription processes observed in TF plants may facilitate the use of the host nuclear factors for ZYMV replication [30].

In our experiment, the tolerant cultivar 381e showed an increased photosynthetic and photo-respiratory activity promoting recovery and symptoms alleviation. The response to viral infection in 381e required a global host transcriptome reprogramming to avoid the developing of more severe symptoms. Indeed, the up-regulation of genes involved in energy production and cell repairing was observed at 12 DPI. Our results were in agreement with Nováková et al. [31], in which the partially resistant C.pepo cv Jaguar showed a strong up-regulation of several proteins involved in photosystems activities 15 days after ZYMV inoculation [31]. Interestingly, we found a high up-regulated gene coding for an HSP90.5 (Cup001195g045603.1) with a LogFC of 4.6 exclusively expressed in 381e (GO:0045037, supplementary material 4). Proper control of HSP90.5 expression was required for plant growth and development and was essential for the formation of chloroplast thylakoids and the regulation of receptor proteins involved in plant immunity [32,33,34]. In addition, the overexpressed HSP70 (Cup000010g010288.1) cooperates with the overexpressed 14–3-3 chaperone (Cup000060g034360.1) to keep the chloroplast or mitochondrial precursor proteins in an unfolded state and to translocate them through plasmodesmata [35, 36]. By contrast, the TF photosynthetic system was affected by the down-regulation of the genes involved in the formation of chloroplasts and thylakoids.

Symptom recovery is generally accompanied by the activation of pathogen receptor genes and other defense-related genes during the plant-pathogen interaction [23, 37, 38]. In particular, we found a resistance protein (Cup000003g003423.1, CNL), annotated by Andolfo et al., [19] and located on linkage group 8 scaffold 3, that was up-regulated and privately expressed (LogFC = 1.51) in 381e [19, 39, 40]. It is interesting to note that this transcript carried a variant leading to functional modification. In our study, numerous genes codifying for serine-threonine kinases proteins were found to be differentially expressed in both cultivars. In particular, seven proteins showed a high homology to well-characterised R-genes as identified by Andolfo et al. (2017) and may play a central role in signalling during zucchini-ZYMV interaction (Supplementary Table 6).

Furthermore, SNP1 was localized in the coding sequence of an RNA helicase. Deleterious effects on viral ToMV infectivity after the loss of function of helicase genes and in response to other stresses have been described [41, 42].

A serine-threonine kinase (Cup000024g021133.1), belonging to the RIO protein family, was down-regulated and privately expressed in TF. This gene was located on linkage group one (scaffold 24), corresponding to one of the regions putatively introgressed from Menina in 381e. These proteins are generally involved in the biogenesis of small ribosomal subunits and were found to interact with the Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) movement protein (MP) to promote virus movement [43, 44].

The ZYMV virus enters the cells through wounds or introduced by aphids and moves from cell to cell through the plasmodesma to reach the phloem, where it induces systemic infections. A delicate equilibrium between RNA silencing and virus counter-defense responses in recovered leaves may help in maintaining the viral levels below the threshold required for the symptom induction. In TF, we found the up-regulation of the CYP82C2 (Cup000001g001147.1) gene, which in Arabidopsis has a role in JA-induced defense genes [45]. In addition, we found two synaptotagmins (SYTA) exclusively expressed in TF. These proteins are key regulators of plant virus intercellular movement, able to promote the movement of the proteins through the cells and to regulate endocytosis and protein-mediated trafficking through plasmodesmata [46, 47].

In 381e, the up-regulation of genes involved in cytoskeleton organization, vesicular trafficking and callose deposition, such as Cup000021g019191.1 (LogFC = 1.59), could enhance plant tolerance by reducing the virus spread from cell to cell through the regulation of plasmodesmal permeability [48, 49]. By contrast, the up-regulation of genes involved in cell wall degradation (such as the pectinesterases) was observed in TF.

Since 381e and TF were two near-isogenic cultivars, comparing them at genome level allowed us to identify two regions enriched in SNPs in the tolerant cultivar 381e. These regions could be considered introgressed from Menina and therefore putatively involved in 381e tolerance.

The tolerance level of 381e to ZYMV was not as high as in C. moschata cv Menina, and some other genes could be involved in the resistance regulation [6, 50]. A marker located on chromosome 8, showing 90% co-segregation with tolerant phenotypes, was previously identified in an F2 population derived from the cross between 381e and TF [11]. The correlation of LG08SNP4 with resistance traits in the F2 population (381e x TF) was also very high, supporting the finding of Capuozzo et al., [11]. Furthermore, the lower correlation of LG01SNP1 with tolerant phenotypes suggested that genes with minor effects on the virus tolerance expression could be located on LG 01. Our RNA-seq analysis allowed us to identify candidate genes that could be involved in 381e-ZYMV tolerance. However, other studies should be carried out to define better which genes are responsible for tolerance. The identification of introgressed regions emerging from our study is essential for discovering new genetic markers associated with ZYMV tolerance. Further experiments could be done to narrow down the region and characterize differential expressed genes by biotechnological approaches.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the network of expressed genes at 12 days after virus infection in 381e revealed the recovery of physiological processes. In particular, we found the differential regulation of genes involved in the photorespiration process (Cup000018g017445.1, Cup000025g021749.1 and Cup000010g010661.1), in transport (Cup000060g034360.1) and possibly, affecting virus replication and movements (Cup000013g012986.1, Cup000003g003423.1). Furthermore, two introgressed regions in 381e from Menina, containing NLR genes, serine-threonine and DEAD-box RNA helicases, could be involved in tolerance to ZYMV. In particular, on linkage group eight might be located a major gene responsible for tolerance and on linkage group one a minor gene with an additive effect that complements the major gene's contribution. Further experiments should be performed to fine mapping contributing loci and to functional characterize differential expressed genes.

Materials and methods

Plant material and ZYMV-inoculation

Two zucchini near-isogenic cultivars, TF (susceptible to ZYMV) and 381e (tolerant to ZYMV), were kindly provided by La Semiorto Sementi. These cultivars were used for an RNA-seq experiment and DNA sequencing, following the scheme reported in Fig. 5. The latter cultivar has been derived from six generations of backcrossing to TF, selected for tolerance, and followed by four successive generations of self-pollination [10]. Forty seeds of each cultivar were sown one per pot in multi-cellular trays consisting of 4 cm diameter pots filled with peat. After the sowing, seedlings were transferred into pots with diameters of 15 cm and were grown under glasshouse condition at 22–24 °C using supplement lighting to maintain 12 h photoperiod at the Research Centre for Plant Pathology (CRA-PAV) in Rome. An identification number was assigned to each plant. In our experiment, we used an isolate of ZYMV from a naturally infected field-grown summer squash plant. The isolate caused the typical symptoms of ZYMV disease, including yellow mosaic, vein banding, blistering and leaves malformations. Symptomatic leaves of artificially infected zucchini plants, kept in greenhouse for symptom development, were crushed, and the raw juice was extracted at a ratio of 1:10 w/v in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2. Seedlings at stage of 1–2 leaves, sprinkled with the abrasive powder "celite," were inoculated with approximately 20 μl of the diluted extract and subsequently washed with distilled water. Non-inoculated plants were used as control.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Graphical experimental schema

Full size image

Sample collection and nucleic acid isolation

Twelve days after the treatment, infected zucchini leaf samples of three independent replicates were collected. Leaves were removed from the plants, weighed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy Plant Kit according to the manual instructions (Qiagen Valencia, USA). The concentration of RNA samples was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). RNA integrity was checked by horizontal electrophoresis on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel. Two μg of each sample were prepared with 20 μl of 10 X RNA Loading Buffer composed of 400 μl Formamide, 10 μl 37% formaldehyde, 2 μl loading buffer 10X (50% glycerol, 0.25% w/v bromophenol blue, 0.25% w/v xylene cyanol; Sigma) and 1 μl of 10 mg/μl SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen). Gel visualization was performed using UV light (UV Gel Doc BIORAD).

Total purified RNA of three independent replicas was converted to cDNA libraries (QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit, Qiagen) and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq1500 platform at the LabMedMolGe (Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, following a paired-end sequencing (2 × 100 bp).

RNA-Sequencing data analysis

The raw reads obtained for each sample, following Illumina sequencing, were analyzed using the online platform A.I.R. (https://transcriptomics.sequentiabiotech.com), containing algorithms and software packages described in Vara et al. [51]. After a quality check (adapter removal and trimming of low-quality reads), the cleaned reads were mapped against the C. pepo reference genome, and genes with an FPKM value > 1 were considered expressed. The number of reads for each sample before and after the quality check, the mean GC content and the sequence length are reported in supplementary materials (Supplementary Table 5). The read counts obtained were analyzed using the DESeq2 algorithm to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Genes with an FDR (using Benjamini–Hochberg correction method) < 0.05 were considered DEGs and used for further analyses. DEGs with positive or negative logFC values were classified as upregulated (logFC > 0) or downregulated (logFC < 0), respectively. Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis on DEGs was performed using AgriGO version 2.0 [52]. The C.pepo reference genome version 4.1 (BGV004370) and relative gene annotation used for the analysis were reported by Montero‐Pau et al. and Andolfo et al., respectively [16, 19].

Variant calling and genome plot construction

A SNP calling analysis was performed to detect SNPs and InDel, on the transcripts of the susceptible TF and tolerant 381e accessions, compared to Cucurbita pepo reference genome version 4.1 (BGV004370) [16]. Position of SNPs and InDel within the aligned reads compared to the reference genome were identified using the pileup function in SAMtools v1.9 [53]. SNPs were filtered using a minimum SNP quality score (QUAL), mapping quality (MQ) and genotype quality (GQ) of 30, an allele frequency (AF) higher than 0.75 and a minimum and maximum read depths (coverage) set to 5 and 100, respectively. Finally, the circular multi-track plot was carried out using the “RCircos” R package [54].

Validation of predicted variants

DNA was extracted from not infected leaves (control plants) of the 381e and TF using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNA sample concentration was determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). In addition, the DNA of an F2 segregating population (381e x TF) obtained by Capuozzo et al. was also used for markers validation [11]. A pool of six coding DNA regions was selected to perform the molecular validation of the variants identified in 381e and TF. PCR was executed with 25 ng of genomic or complementary DNA, 10 pmol primers, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10 pmol dNTPs, and 2 mM MgCl2 in 25 μl reaction volumes. Amplification was performed using the following cycling conditions: 1 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min 30 s at 60 °C and 2 min at 72 °C, with a final extension for 7 min at 72 °C. Amplicons were separated by electrophoresis on agarose gel (1.5%) and photographed by a GelDoc apparatus. Primers were designed with Primer3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu), with a length between 18 and 27 bp. The length of the amplified fragments ranged from 300 to 1,000 bp, and the Tm of the specific primers was 59 °C for all pairs of primers (Online Resource S4). Amplicons were sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and run on automated DNA sequencers (ABI PRISM 3100 DNA Sequencer, Applied Biosystems). Sequence data deriving from C. pepo reference genome v 4.1 (BGV004370) were aligned with corresponding sequences originated from amplicons, using MUSCLE 3.6 [55]. In addition, two couples of primers were tested on a subset of the F2 segregating population (381e x TF) phenotyped by Capuozzo et al. [11]. Both Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were applied on marker-phenotype data.

Availability of data and materials

The data set supporting the results of this article is available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository of NCBI under the GEO accession number: GSE159530, at link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE159530

Abbreviations

ZYMV:

Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus

DPI:

Days Post Inoculation

DEGs:

Differentially Expressed Genes

SYTA:

Synaptotagmin

CNL:

Coiled-Coil Nucleotide binding domain Leucine rich repeat

TF:

True French

FDR:

False Discovery Rate

GO:

Gene Ontology

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

PEP:

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

HSP:

Heat Shock Protein

SNV:

Single Nucleotide Variants

INDEL:

Insertion and Deletion

LG:

Linkage Group

NLR:

Nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing receptors

PPR:

Proteins and Receptor like Kinase

CDF:

Coding DNA Fragments

References

  1. Castle SJ, Perring TM, Farrar CA, Kishaba A. Field and laboratory transmission of watermelon mosaic virus 2 and zucchini yellow mosaic virus by various aphid species. Phytopatol. 1992;82:235–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desbiez C, Lecoq H. Zucchini yellow mosaic virus Plant Path. 1997;46:809–29. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-87.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katis NI, Tsitsipis JA, Lykouressis DP, Papapanayotou A, Margaritopoulos JT, Kokinis GM, Perdikis DC, Manoussopoulos IN. Transmission of zucchini yellow mosaic virus by colonizing and non-colonizing aphids in Greece and new aphid species vectors of the virus. J Phytopathol. 2006;154:293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson RW, Weeden NF, Provvidenti R. Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in the interspecific cross Cucurbita maxima x C. ecuadorensis. Cucurbit Gen Coop Rep. 1988;11:74–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leibman D, Wolf D, Saharan V, Zelcer A, Arazi T, Yoel S, Gaba V, Gal-On A. A high level of transgenic viral small RNA is associated with broad potyvirus resistance in cucurbits. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011;24:1220–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pachner M, Paris HS, Lelley T. Genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic in tropical pumpkin. J Hered. 2011;102:330–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esr006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paris HS, Cohen S, Burger Y, Yoseph R. Singlegene resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita moschata. Euphytica. 1988;37:27–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pachner M, Lelley T. Progress in cucurbit genetics and breeding research. Proc Cucurbitaceae. In: Lebeda A, Paris HS, editors. Different genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) in Cucurbita moschata. Olomouc: 8th EUCARPIA meeting on cucurbit genetics and breeding; 2004. p. 237–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nacar Ç, Fidan H, Ekbiç E, Aras V, Denli N, Keles D. In: Development of suitable sources of resistance to ZYMV in Cucurbita pepo. Cucurbitaceae. Antalya, Turkey: Proceedings of the 10th EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae; 2012. p. 633–7 15–18 October.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paris HS, Cohen S. Oligogenic inheritance for resistance to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus in Cucurbita pepo. Annals of Applied Biology. 2000;136:209–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2000.tb00027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Capuozzo C, Formisano G, Iovieno P, Andolfo G, Tomassoli L, Barbella MM, Pico B, Paris HS, Ercolano MR. Inheritance analysis and identification of SNP markers associated with ZYMV resistance in Cucurbita pepo. Mol Breeding. 2017;37:99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-017-0698-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pachner M, Paris HS, Winkler J, Lelley T. Phenotypic and marker-assisted pyramiding of genes for resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus in oilseed pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). Plant Breed. 2015;134:121–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anagnostou K, Jahn M, Perl-Treves R. Inheritance and linkage analysis of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus, watermelon mosaic virus, papaya ringspot virus and powdery mildew in melon. Euphytica. 2000;116:265–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004005716806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park Y, Katzir N, Brotman Y, King J, Bertrand F, Havey M. Comparative mapping of ZYMV resistances in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) and melon (Cucumis melo L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:707–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1684-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iovieno P, Andolfo G, Schiavulli A, Catalano D, Ricciardi L, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR, Pavan S. Structure, evolution and functional inference on the Mildew Locus O (MLO) gene family in three cultivated Cucurbitaceae spp. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:1112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2325-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Montero-Pau J, Blanca J, Bombarely A, Ziarsolo P, Esteras C, Martí-Gómez C, Ferriol M, Gómez P, Jamilena M, Mueller L, Picó B, Cañizares J. De novo assembly of the zucchini genome reveals a whole-genome duplication associated with the origin of the Cucurbita genus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1161–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wyatt L, Strickler S, Mueller L, Mazourek M. An acorn squash (Cucurbita pepo ssp. ovifera) fruit and seed transcriptome as a resource for the study of fruit traits in Cucurbita. Hortic Res. 2015;2:14070. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2014.70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Xanthopoulou A, Psomopoulos F, Ganopoulos I, Manioudaki M, Tsaftaris A, Nianiou-Obeidat I, Panagiotis M. De novo transcriptome assembly of two contrasting pumpkin cultivars. Genomics Data. 2016;7:200–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Andolfo G, Di Donato A, Darrudi R, Errico A, Aiese Cigliano R, Ercolano MR. Draft of Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.) Proteome: A Resource for Genetic and Genomic Studies. Front Genet. 2017;8:181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou D, Xin Z, Yi L, Zhenhai Z, Zhen S. agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue H, Li M, Schnell DJ. An essential role for chloroplast heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90C) in protein import into chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:3173–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219229110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rajniak J, Barco B, Clay N, Sattely E. A new cyanogenic metabolite in Arabidopsis required for inducible pathogen defence. Nat. 2015;525:376–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zellnig G, Pöckl MH, Möstl S, Zechmann B. Two- and three-dimensional characterization of Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus induced structural alterations in Cucurbita pepo L. plants. J Struct Biol. 2014;186:245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bengyella L, Waikhom SD, Allie F, Rey C. Virus tolerance and recovery from viral induced symptoms in plants are associated with transcriptome reprograming. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;89:243–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0362-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanley-Bowdoin L, Bejarano E, Robertson D, Mansoor S. Geminiviruses: masters at redirecting and reprogramming plant processes. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:777–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghoshal B, Sanfaçon H. Symptom recovery in virus-infected plants: Revisiting the role of RNA silencing mechanisms. Virology. 2015;479–480:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2015.01.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nigam D, LaTourrette K, Souza Pedro FN, Garcia-Ruiz H. Genome-Wide Variation in Potyviruses. Front in Plant Sci. 2019;10:1439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu CY, Nagy PD. Blocking tombusvirus replication through the antiviral functions of DDX17-like RH30 DEAD- box helicase. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pandey S, Prasad A, Sharma N, Prasad M. Linking the plant stress responses with RNA helicases. Plant Sci. 2020;299:110607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar S, Karmakar R, Gupta I, Patel AK. Interaction of potyvirus helper component-proteinase (HcPro) with RuBisCO and nucleosome in viral infections of plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;151:313–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nováková S, Flores-Ramírez G, Glasa M, Danchenko M, Fiala R, Skultety L. Partially resistant Cucurbita pepo showed late onset of the Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infection due to rapid activation of defense mechanisms as compared to susceptible cultivar. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Oh SE, Yeung C, Babaei-Rad R, Zhao R. Cosuppression of the chloroplast localized molecular chaperone HSP90.5 impairs plant development and chloroplast biogenesis in Arabidopsis. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:643. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hubert DA, Tornero P, Belkhadir Y, Krishna P, Takahashi A, Shirasu K, Dangl JL. Cytosolic HSP90 associates with and modulates the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. EMBO J. 2003;22:5679–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Y, Burch-Smith T, Schiff M, Feng S, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Molecular chaperone Hsp90 associates with resistance protein N and its signalling proteins SGT1 and Rar1 to modulate an innate immune response in plants. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2101–8. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310029200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aoki K, Kragler F, Xoconostle-Cazares B, Lucas WJ. A subclass of plant heat shock cognate 70 chaperones carries a motif that facilitates trafficking through plasmodesmata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:16342–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252427999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang XP, Glaser E. Interaction of plant mitochondrial and chloroplast signal peptides with the Hsp70 molecular chaperone. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:14–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Osuna-Cruz CM, Paytuvi-Gallart A, Di Donato A, Sundesha V, Andolfo G, Aiese Cigliano R, Sanseverino W, Ercolano MR. PRGdb 3.0: a comprehensive platform for prediction and analysis of plant disease resistance genes. Nuc Acids Res. 2018;46:1197–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Niehl A, Wyrsch I, Boller T, Heinlein M. Double-stranded RNAs induce a pattern-triggered immune signaling pathway in plants. New Phytol. 2016;211:1008–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Andolfo G, Jupe F, Witek K, Etherington G, Ercolano MR, Jones JDG. Defining the full tomato NB-LRR resistance gene repertoire using genomic and cDNA RenSeq. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Andolfo G, Di Donato A, Chiaiese P, De Natale A, Pollio A, Jones JDG, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR. Alien Domains Shaped the Modular Structure of Plant NLR Proteins. Genome Biol Evol. 2019;11:3466–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu R, Zhang S, Lu L, Cao H, Zheng C. A genome-wide analysis of the RNA helicase gene family in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene. 2013;513(1):128–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ishibashi K, Kezuka Y, Kobayashi C, Kato M, Inoue T, Nonaka T, Ishikawa M, Matsumura H, Katoh E. Structural basis for the recognition-evasion arms race between Tomato mosaic virus and the resistance gene Tm-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:E3486–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gao Q, Xu S, Zhu X, Wang L, Yang Z, Zhao X. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the RIO atypical kinase family in plants. Genes Genom. 2018;40:669–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0658-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshioka K, Matsushita Y, Kasahara M, Konagaya K, Nyunoya H. Interaction of tomato mosaic virus movement protein with tobacco RIO kinase. Mol Cells. 2004;17:223–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Uchiyama A, Shimada-Beltran H, Levy A, Zheng JY, Javia PA, Lazarowitz SG. The Arabidopsis synaptotagmin SYTA regulates the cell-to-cell movement of diverse plant viruses. Front in Plant Sci. 2014;5:584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lewis DJ, Lazarowitz SG. Arabidopsis synaptotagmin SYTA regulates endocytosis and virus movement protein cell-to-cell transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:2491–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909080107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Li W, Zhao Y, Liu C, Yao G, Wu S, Hou C, Zhang M, Wang D. Callose deposition at plasmodesmata is a critical factor in restricting the cell-to-cell movement of Soybean mosaic virus. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31:905–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1211-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bo X, Yunfei D, Masahiro M, Kanaoka KO, Zonglie H. Expression of Arabidopsis callose synthase 5 results in callose accumulation and cell wall permeability alteration. Plant Sci. 2012;183:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu F, Jiang H, Ye S, Chen W, Liang W, Xu Y, Sun B, Sun J, Wang Q, Cohen JD, Li C. The Arabidopsis P450 protein CYP82C2 modulates jasmonate-induced root growth inhibition, defense gene expression and indole glucosinolate biosynthesis. Cell Res. 2010;20:539–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Paris HS, Brown R. The Genes of Pumpkin and Squash. HortSci. 2005;40:1620–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vara C, Paytuví-Gallart A, Cuartero Y, Le Dily F, Garcia F, Salvà-Castro J, Gómez-H L, Julià E, Moutinho C, Aiese Cigliano R, et al. Three-dimensional genomic structure and cohesin occupancy correlate with transcriptional activity during spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2019;28:352–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tian T, Yue L, Hengyu Y, Qi Y, Xin Y, Zhou D, Wenying X, Zhen S. agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W122. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup, The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinforma. 2009;25:2078–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang H, Meltzer P, Davis S. RCircos: an R package for Circos 2D track plots. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:244. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acid Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank La Semiorto Sementi S.r.l. for plant material and Romanos Zois, an Erasmus student from Wageningen University (NL), for supporting molecular analysis.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of University and Research (GenHORT project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Science, University of Naples “Federico II”, Portici, NA, Naples, Italy

    C. G. Amoroso, G. Andolfo, C. Capuozzo, A. Di Donato & M. R. Ercolano

  2. Department of Biology and Geology, Research Centers CIAIMBITAL and CeiA3, University of Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain

    C. Martinez

  3. Consiglio Per La Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi Dell’Economia Agraria, Research Centre of Plant Control and Certification, Rome, Italy

    L. Tomassoli

Authors
  1. C. G. Amoroso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Andolfo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Capuozzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Di Donato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L. Tomassoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. R. Ercolano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.E.; methodology, G.A, C.C and A.D.D; validation, C.G.A; formal analysis, C.G.A, G.A, C.C, A.D.D, C.M; investigation, L.T; resources Supervision GA and AD.D; M.R.E.; writing—original draft preparation C.G.A, G.A and M.R.E; writing—review and editing, C.M and L.T; project funding acquisition, M.R.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Ercolano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Our experimental study, including the reproduction of plant and virus material, did not require approval from an ethics committee and did not involve human or animal subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Number of short variants (SNV and InDel) identified in TF and 381e. For each C. pepo linkage group (LG) the length, percentage of expressed genes (EGs) and number of normalised variants are reported. Table S2. Number of short variants (SNV and InDel) identified in TF and 381e. For each C. pepo linkage group (LG) the length, percentage of expressed genes (EGs) and number of normalised variants are reported. Table S3. Validation of 6 polymorphic loci located on putative genomic regions introgressed from ‘Menina’. For each amplicon, locus name, primer and polymorphism information are reported. Additional Table 4. Protein function of gene annotation reported by Andolfo et al. [11]. Additional Table 5. Summary of the RNA-Seq data. Number of reads before and after the quality check, mean GC content and sequence length were reported for each biological replicate (BR). Supplementary Table 6. List of differentially expressed receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinases that were identified and classified in Cucurbita pepo cv. True French by Andolfo et al., (2017). Supplementary Table 7. High confident UP and DOWN regulated genes (Up regulated with LogFC > 1 and Down regulated with LogFC < 1).

Additional file 2: Additional Figure 1.

Gel electrophoretic separation of digested PCR products (left 381e, right TF); panel A: LG01SNP1; panel B: LG08SNP4. Relevant fragment sizes (bp) are denoted on the right side (1Kb plus). Additional Figure 2. Comparison of the ZYMV tolerant line 381e (left) and the susceptible True French (right) 12 days after ZYMV inoculation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amoroso, C.G., Andolfo, G., Capuozzo, C. et al. Transcriptomic and genomic analysis provides new insights in molecular and genetic processes involved in zucchini ZYMV tolerance. BMC Genomics 23, 371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08596-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08596-4

Keywords

  • Cucurbita pepo
  • RNA-seq
  • Transcriptome
  • Molecular markers
  • Plant recovery
  • Plant virus

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us