Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification and validation of a major QTL for kernel length in bread wheat based on two F3 biparental populations

BMC Genomics volume 23, Article number: 386 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

High yield and quality are essential goals of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding. Kernel length (KL), as a main component of kernel size, can indirectly change kernel weight and then affects yield. Identification and utilization of excellent loci in wheat genetic resources is of great significance for cultivating high yield and quality wheat. Genetic identification of loci for KL has been performed mainly through genome-wide association study in natural populations or QTL mapping based on genetic linkage map in high generation populations.

Results

In this study, an F3 biparental population derived from the cross between an EMS mutant BLS1 selected from an EMS-induced wheat genotype LJ2135 (derived from the hybrid progeny of a spelt wheat (T. spelta L.) and a common wheat) mutant bank and a local breeding line 99E18 was used to rapidly identify loci controlling KL based on Bulked Segregant Analysis (BSA) and the wheat 660 K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. The highest ratio of polymorphic SNPs was located on chromosome 4A. Linkage map analysis showed that 33 Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR markers were linked to the QTL for KL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) identified in three environments as well as the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) dataset. This QTL explained 10.87—19.30% of the phenotypic variation. Its effect was successfully confirmed in another F3 population with the two flanking markers KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441. Compared with previous studies and given that the of BLS1 has the genetic background of spelt wheat, the major QTL was likely a new one. A few of predicted genes related to regulation of kernel development were identified in the interval of the detected QTL.

Conclusion

A major, novel and stable QTL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) for KL was identified and verified in two F3 biparental populations across three environments. Significant relationships among KL, kernel width (KW) and thousand kernel weight (TKW) were identified. Four predicted genes related to kernel growth regulation were detected in the interval of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A. Furthermore, this study laid foundation on subsequent fine mapping work and provided a possibility for breeding of elite wheat varieties.

Peer Review reports

Background

The annual increase rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) yield will be deficient to meet the future needs of the rapidly growing population. The decrease of genetic diversity among wheat varieties under the modern breeding mode is one of the reasons for the above phenomena [1]. Spelt wheat (T. spelta L.), one of the hexaploid wheats, is an archaic cereal with the primitive genomes related to bread wheat. Spelt wheat has high nutritional compositions, and its microelement content is higher and more abundant than common wheat [2, 3]. Spelt and bread wheat have the same genome (AABBDD), and their genetic distance is comparatively small, which is helpful for the production of stable cross breeds [4]. Compared with ancestral wheat species, the phenotypic variation of kernel traits in the modern germplasm pool is significantly reduced [5]. Therefore, it is of important significance to excavate new loci controlling kernel traits in wheat breeding. Kernel length (KL), as one of the main components that constitute kernel size, is a complex quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes. It can indirectly change kernel weight and ultimately affect yield [6]. Furthermore, genetic and phenotypic structures support variations in kernel size and shape. Kernel size increases gradually through changes in KW and KL, and in the later stage, changes in kernel shape are mainly realized through changes in KL [5]. For example, TaGL3-5A was co-located with a significant QTL for KL. Correlation analysis revealed that the TaGL3-5A-G allele was significantly correlated with longer KL and higher thousand kernel weight (TKW) [7]. TaGS-D1 is associated with kernel weight and KL in common wheat [8]. Thus, it is extremely important to identify and utilize loci associated with KL in wheat gene resources for cultivating wheat with high yield and quality.

As typical quantitative traits, kernel traits are sensitive to environmental effects. The application of quantitative trait loci (QTL) provides an efficient method for studying complex quantitative traits [9]. Numerous studies related to QTL for kernel traits have been reported in wheat. For example, QTL for KL were detected on chromosomes 1B, 2B, 2D, 3B and 7B [10]. Thirteen QTL affecting KL were identified on chromosomes 2A, 2B, 2D, 3A, 6B, 7A, and 7B [11]. TAGS-D1, a homologous gene of OsGS3 in rice, was located on 7DS and increased KL and kernel weight [8]. Three QTL (QGw.nau-2D, QGw.nau-4B, and QGw.nau-5A) had effects on KL, kernel width (KW) and kernel thickness (KT) of wheat [12]. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) locus was found to be closely linked to a QTL associated with KL on 7AL [13]. A major QTL on 5A increased KL by increasing the length of kernel epidermis cells to achieve the purpose of enhancing kernel weight [14]. Three major QTL QKL.sicau-2D, QKW.sicau-2D and QTKW.sicau-2D for KL, KW and TKW were identified in the same interval on 2DS [15]. QKL.sicau-2SY-1B, QKW.sicau-2SY-6D, QKT.sicau-2SY-2D, and QTKW.sicau-2SY-2D, QLWR.sicau-2SY-6D, QKS.sicau-2SY-1B/2D/6D, and QFFD.sicau-2SY-2D for KL, KW, KT, TKW, kernel length–width ratio (LWR), kernel size (KS), and factor form density (FFD) were located on 1B, 2D, and 6D and formed 3 QTL clusters [16]. Eleven QTL affecting KL and KW including two major QTL QKL.sicau-AM-3B and QKW.sicau-AM-4B were identified on 3BL and 4BL [17].

According to the extreme differences of individual phenotypes in the offspring population produced by a pair of parents with related traits, two gene banks were constructed by screening and collecting DNA samples for of Bulked Segregant Analysis (BSA). This method usually provided a convenient and quick method for identifying markers for genomic regions associated with target traits [18, 19]. In previous studies, PCR-based molecular markers, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and simple sequence repeats (SSR), had been generally used for gene mapping, but these markers usually take a long time to construct the map, and the density of map cannot meet the demand of fine mapping [20]. SNPs are important resource of polymorphic markers and can be used for gene mapping in the genome of any living organism. In the process of genotyping and marker-assisted selection, the wheat 660 K SNP array is an accurate, economical and dependable option [21].

To our knowledge, many reports have shown that using early generations of wheat to rapidly conduct major and stable QTL analysis combined with BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array. For example, on the basis of BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array in F1, F2, and F2:3 populations, YrZl31 conferring stripe rust resistance was mapped on chromosome 2BL [20]. Qyryac.nwafu-2BS, a novel QTL for adult plant resistance to stripe rust was identified on 2B using BSA and 660 K SNP array in an F2:3 population [22]. The above method has been widely used to identify wheat resistance genes, but rarely applied in quantitative traits. QTL related to KL in wheat have been detected on almost each of the chromosomes, but they were usually shown as micro-effect and unstable. Most of them were detected in a single population and not verified in diverse backgrounds. Therefore, it is necessary for wheat breeding to excavate and identify major and stable QTL for KL.

In this study, we employed early generations of wheat population in combination with BSA-660 K SNP array to detect genetic differences between two pools with extreme phenotypes of KL. And we further identify and validate major and stable QTL for KL across different environments base on a linkage map.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Two F3 biparental populations derived from the crosses between three wheat genotypes: BLS1 and 99E18 (BLE18, the mapping population) and between BLS1 and Sumai3 (BLSM3, the validation population), comprising 237 and 178 lines, respectively, were used in this study. BLS1 is a genetically stable mutant (M5 generation) selected from an EMS-induced wheat genotype LJ2135 mutant bank. LJ2135 was a genetically stable line and is derived from the hybrid progeny of a spelt wheat (T. spelta L., LS5893) and a common wheat (JM6893), Given its relatively better agronomic traits including appropriate plant height and large spike, LJ2135 was selected to be a breeding parent. The KL of BLS1 can reach 8 mm under conventional cultivation conditions. The lines 99E18 and Sumai3 show shorter KL than BLS1 (Fig. 1a and Figure S1), and both have excellent disease resistance [23], especially Sumai3, which is a classic wheat variety with famous fusarium head blight resistant gene, Fhb1 [24].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The phenotypes of kernels and pericarp cells. a Kernel phenotypes of the parents and partial lines in BLE18 population. Scale bar = 1 cm; b Scanning electron microscope observation of pericarp cells in mature kernels. Scale bar = 50 μm; c, d. Statistical analysis of cell length and width of kernel pericarp cells

Full size image

Phenotypic evaluation

In October of 2020, the BLE18 and BLSM3 populations were grown in three different environments including Wenjiang (103°51ʹE, 30°43ʹN), Chongzhou (103°38ʹE, 30°32 ʹN), and Ya’an (103°0ʹE, 29°58ʹN) of Sichuan Province in China. Each line was planted in a single 1.5 m row with 0.3 m between rows, and 15 kernels were sown in a row with 0.1 m between kernels within a row. The field management followed the local practices of wheat production. After the harvested kernels were dried at 37 °C in an oven until a constant dry weight was obtained [25], 36 full and uniform kernels mainly from the spikelets located in the middle of the spike of different plants in each line were selected and scanned by the Epson Expression 10,000 XL flatbed color image scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Japan) and further analyzed by WinSEEDLE (Regent Instruments Canada Inc) for measurements of KL and KW. Cell length and width of kernel pericarp from three parents were observed and measured using the Quanta 450FEG scanning electron microscope. Different lines were characterized phenotypically in different environments. Totally, 239, 218 and 137 lines of BLE18 were measured in Wenjiang, Chongzhou, and Ya’an, respectively. Notably, some lines with poor-quality kernels especially in Ya’an were not used for further analysis, and the statistics of lines used for kernel investigation in Ya’an were listed in Table S1. Hundred kernel weight (HKW) was obtained by randomly weighting 100 kernels per line through an electronic balance with the precision of 0.01 g, and TKW calculated as 10-folds of the average HKW with three replicates.

BSA, Wheat 660 K SNP array analysis, and KASP markers development

The combination of BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array was performed to identify SNPs between two parents and two phenotypically contrasting pools. The 30 lines in each of two relative extreme mixing pools were selected through the following steps: (1) The phenotypic data of KL of BLE18 in three environments were arranged in a descending order. The number of 40 lines with the maximum and minimum values in the three environments were respectively taken and recorded. (2) Average values of each line from three-environments phenotypic data of KL were calculated and recorded. (3) The intersection of the numbers obtained in (1) and (2) was screened, and 30 lines with the maximum and minimum values were finally selected. The equal amounts of genomic DNA from 30 lines with the shortest KL (10 kernels per line), 30 lines with the longest KL (10 kernels per line) and two parents were extracted using the CTAB method [26]. The DNA were further used for the wheat 660 K SNP array analysis in Beijing CapitalBio Technology Co, Ltd. Two parent pools were used to exclude interference of false positive markers. For example, one marker showing polymorphic between two phenotypically contrasting pools, but not between parents will be excluded.

The polymorphic SNPs between two extreme mixing pools associated with the target QTL were converted into Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) markers to construct linkage map. The sequences of primers were designed as per the KASP primer design manual [27], and the primer sequences are listed in Table S2. The allele-specific forward primers were designed carrying FAM (5′-GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCT-3′) and HEX (5′-GAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATT-3′) at the 5′ end. In this study, the KASP amplification reaction was conducted in volume of 10 μl including 5 μl of 1 × SsoFast EvaGreen mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 1.4 μl of mixture forward and reverse primers, 3.1 μl of deionized water and 0.5 μl of 50–80 ng/ μl DNA. PCR cycling was performed using the following procedure: hot starting at 94 °C for 15 min, 10 touchdown cycles (94 °C for 20 s; touchdown 60 °C, drop 0.6 °C per cycle, for 60 s), and then by 25 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 20 s, and 55 °C for 60 s.

Genotyping and genetic map construction

A total of 33 KASP markers were developed to detect SNP polymorphism between two parents, and the effective polymorphic markers were further used to genotype BLE18 population. The results of markers’ classification were applied to construct the genetic linkage map with the Kosambi function format in JoinMap 4.0. The sequences of two flanking makers were used to blast (E-value of 1e-5) against the genome assembly of IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 (http://202.194.139.32/blast/blast.html) to obtain the physical locations [28]. The linkage map was drawn by MapChart 2.2.

Data analysis and QTL mapping

Phenotypic variation, frequency distributions, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were implemented using SPSS 22 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). The best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) dataset of KL under three environments were calculated using SAS V8.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA; https://www.sas.com). The BLUP were calculated based on the following model: Yi = Xif + ai + ei, where f is a fixed-effects vector, Xi is an incidence vector, ai is the value of phenotype and ei is the environmental deviation [29]. Based on the genetic linkage map and kernel phenotypic data in three environments as well as the BLUP, we identified the QTL for KL using IciMapping 4.1 with the Inclusive Composite Interval Mapping (ICIM) setting the LOD threshold ≥ 2.5 [30]. In addition, IciMapping 4.1 was used to analyze QTL × environment (QE) interaction, and the pre-adjusted parameters were as follows: step = 1 cM, PIN = 0.001 and LOD = 2.5. When the Percentage Variation Explained (PVE) of a given QTL was greater than 10% and can be detected repeatedly in multiple environments, it was considered as a major and stably expressed QTL. QTL was named in accordance with the International Rules of Genetic Nomenclature [16]. For example, the investigated QTL was designated as Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A. In detail, ‘sicau’ means ‘Sichuan Agricultural University’; the uppercase ‘Q’ indicates ‘QTL’; ‘kl’ represents kernel length, the abbreviation of the trait in this study; ‘BLE18’ indicates the mapping population; ‘4A’, represents the chromosome of this QTL.

Validation of the major QTL

After obtaining the initial result of QTL mapping, the flanking markers were used to verify the effect of this QTL in another genetic background to further determine its stability, authenticity, and reliability. Based on the marker profiles, the population was divided into two categories: lines with homozygous alleles from either parent BLS1 or Sumai3 (excluding heterozygous lines). Then student’s t-test (P < 0.05) was utilized to detect significant difference between phenotypic data of two different types of lines.

Comparison of QTL for KL on chromosome 4A

To confirm whether the major QTL detected in this study is a novel locus, the sequences of flanking KASP markers (KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441) for Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A and those for previously identified QTL were utilized to perform blast searches against the reference genome sequence of T. aestivum cv. Chinese Spring (IWGSC RefSeq v2.1). Then, we compared the physical intervals to determine whether they overlap.

Orthologous alignment

The flanking markers of the major QTL in this study were further aligned with the physical map of Chinese Spring (IWGSC RefSeq v2.1) and wild emmer (T. turgidum ssp dicoccoides, WEWSeq v2.0) to get orthologous genes. These genes were further analyzed for gene annotation and function on UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/) [28, 31].

Furthermore, to identify the possible candidate genes of KL, the relative expression levels of the genes identified in the interval of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A were analyzed on the Triticeae Multiomics Center website (http://202.194.139.32/expression/wheat.html) and obtained through the wheat expression database of Chinese Spring cv-1 Development (single) [32].

Results

Phenotypic assessment and correlation analysis

Descriptive statistics for KL, KW and TKW of parents and two populations are presented in Table 1. Compared with BLS1, the KL values of 99E18 were significantly lower, but the KW values were significantly higher (Table 1and Fig. 1a). The KL and TKW values of BLS1 were significantly higher than Sumai3, except for individual environment (Table 1). The frequency distributions of KL showed approximate normal distributions in BLE18 across different environments (Fig. 2). The ranges of KL, KW and TKW were 6.53—8.98 mm, 3.17—4.29 mm, and 29.70 – 75.60 g, respectively, in BLE18 population. In all environments of BLSM3, KL ranged from 6.65 to 9.51 mm, KW from 2.68 to 4.24 mm and TKW from 34.57 to 67.40 g (Table 1). Both cell length and width of the kernel pericarp were significantly greater in BLS1 than in 99E18 and Sumai3, in agreement with the relationship of KL among three parents (Fig. 1b, c, d). The positive correlations for KL were detected among three environments with coefficient ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 in BLE18, and 0.43 to 0.56 among three environments in BLSM3 (P < 0.01, Table S3). The correlations among the three kernel traits were all significant for each other in BLE18 across multiple environments, with coefficient ranging from 0.17 to 0.79 (P < 0.05, Table 2). Significant and positive correlations were observed among KL, KW and TKW in BLSM3 across three environments, with correlation ranging from 0.03 to 0.76. Especially, there were extremely significant correlations (P < 0.01) between TKW and KL or KW in three environments, and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.38 to 0.76 (Table 2).

Table 1 Phenotype of the parents and two populations in different environments
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Frequency distributions for kernel length (KL) in BLE18 across different environments. Environment was defined with year and location. WJ, Wenjiang; CZ, Chongzhou; YA, Ya’an

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation of different kernel traits in BLE18 and BLSM3 populations across different environments
Full size table

BSA and Wheat 660 K analysis

After genotyping with the wheat 660 K SNP array, the number of homozygous polymorphic SNPs between the extreme pools and two parent pools were confirmed, resulting in a total of 764 SNPs, and 446 of them (58.4%) were observed on chromosome 4A (Fig. 3a). Most of the SNPs on 4A were within an interval of 90—160 Mb (Fig. 3b). The number of other SNPs unequally distributed across other chromosomes were ranging from 2 to 77. These results preliminarily determined that a locus controlling KL was most likely located on chromosome 4A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The results of genetic map and the effect of the major QTL for KL in BLE18 population. a The distribution of differential SNPs on chromosome in the mixing pool, transverse axis for different chromosomes, longitudinal axis for the number of SNP; b Distribution of different SNPs on chromosome 4A in different segments, transverse axis for chromosome position, longitudinal axis for the number of SNP; c The position of the markers on the genetic map; d The physical location of the flanking markers of Qkl.sicau-BLE18—4A in Chinese Spring; e Genes in the target region of the Chinese Spring physical map; f Genes homologous to Chinese Spring in the target region of the physical map of wild emmer wheat; g Physical location of flanking markers in wild emmer wheat; h The effect of the major QTL for KL in BLE18 population; WJ, Wenjiang; CZ, Chongzhou; YA, Ya’an; **Significance at the 0.01 probability level

Full size image

Genetic map construction and QTL mapping

A total of 33 KASP markers were developed based on polymorphic SNPs between two parents and two phenotypically contrasting pools on chromosome 4A, and were further used to genotype the population BLE18. Combined with the genotyping results of different markers, the genetic linkage map was constructed with a length of 28.9 cM (Fig. 3c).

A stable QTL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) for KL was detected in three environments as well as BLUP dataset. It was mapped between KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441, with an interval of 2 cM (Table 3 and Fig. 3c). It explained 10.87—19.30% of the phenotypic variation, with LOD values ranging from 3.01 to 6.41. The positive allele of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A was contributed by the parent BLS1, and the KL values of the lines carrying BLS1 alleles were significantly higher than those carrying 99E18 ones (Fig. 3h). No QTL for KW or TKW was identified on this chromosome. Further analysis also showed that this major QTL had no direct effect on KW and TKW (Figure S2).

Table 3 QTL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) for KL identified from different environments in BLE18 population
Full size table

After QTL × environment (QE) interaction analysis (Table S4), two QTL were detected, of which only one was the same as Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A, and had higher LOD (19.16) and PVE values (12.19%), further indicating that Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A was a major and stable QTL.

Validation of the major QTL for KL

The flanking markers tightly linked to Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A were used to verify the effects of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A in BLSM3 across different environments. The polymorphism between BLS1 and Sumai3 was detected using KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441. According to the genotyping results, the population were divided into two categories. The KL of the lines carrying positive alleles from BLS1 was significantly higher than that of the lines without positive alleles (P < 0.05, Fig. 4), and the differences between the two categories ranged from 3.28% to 4.70% in the validation population across three environments.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of major QTL for KL in BLSM3 population across different environments. WJ, Wenjiang; CZ, Chongzhou; YA, Ya’an; **Significance at the 0.01 probability level; *significance at the 0.05 probability level 

Full size image

The homozygous lines of parental alleles ‘BLS1’ and ʻSuami3’ at Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A were selected in accordance with the genotyping data of KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441 for BLSM3 population. T-test showed that the KW and TKW of the lines carrying the ‘BLS1’ alleles were not significantly different from those of the lines without positive alleles in BLSM3 population across different environments, which further confirmed that Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A had no genetic effect on KW and TKW (Figure S3).

Discussion

Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A is a novel and stable QTL

Here, a major and stably expressed QTL, Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A related to KL was detected in wheat between KASP-AX-111536305 and KASP-AX-110174441 on chromosome arm 4AS. In addition, its genetic effect was further validated in another verification population (Fig. 4), which suggested its reliability and stability.

Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A was physically located between 101.74 Mbp and 109.25 Mbp on 4AS of Chinese Spring. To the best of our knowledge, only a few reports have documented QTL related to KL on 4A, and most of them were located on the long arm of 4A (4AL), such as QKl-4A.1, qKL-4A, QKl.sdau-4A, QKL.sicau-4A, QGl.ccsu-4A.1 and QKl.sau-4A.1 [11, 15, 33,34,35,36,37,38] (Table S5). In addition to the QTL mentioned above, we found some QTL on 4AS in previous reports. For example, Q37, a minor QTL, was located in the physical position of 47 Mbp, and the flanking marker Xgwm397 of Q37 was located at 47.3 Mbp [39]. QGl-4A was in the physical interval from 120.0 to 140.4 Mbp on 4AS and mapped into a 0.37 cM genetic interval [40]. QKl.sau-4A.2 was co-located between 41.7 and 60.3 Mbp on chromosome 4AS of CS reference genome [38]. None of the above three genes overlapped with the interval of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A. In addition, as BLS1 is a mutant from an EMS-induced wheat genotype that was derived from the hybrid progeny of a spelt wheat and a common wheat. We think Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A from this mutant may be different from previously reported ones, and should be most likely a novel locus. Further, spelt wheat has high nutritional value and contains all the basic components which are necessary for human beings including protein content and composition, lipids, crude fiber and vitamins [3]. Hybrids of common wheat and spelt wheat provide a positive selection by eliminating undesirable quality and improving nutritional value of bread wheat [41]. Thus, the lines carrying positive allele at Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A should have breeding value given its spelt wheat genetic background.

Analysis of the predicated genes in the interval of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A

We attempted to predict candidate genes for the identified QTL for KL on 4AS chromosome on the basis of the homology comparison results for Chinese Spring (IWGSC RefSeq v2.1) with wild emmer (WEWSeq v2.0) reference genomes. The physical location of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A is between 101.74 to 109.25 Mbp on Chinese Spring and 102.82 to 110.38 Mbp on wild emmer (Fig. 3 d, g). Searching analysis indicated that there were 36 genes in the physical map of Chinese Spring and 38 genes in the physical map of wild emmer wheat, with 33 in common (Table S6 and Fig. 3e, f).

For 33 orthologs, three previously reported genes might be related to kernel traits, and their relative expression levels (http://202.194.139.32/expression/wheat.html) were relatively high in kernels (Figure S4). For example, TraesCS4A02G094300 encodes phosphatase 2C, a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling [42]. TraesCS4A02G094500 encodes tropinone reductases which function at the branch point of tropane alkaloid metabolism [43]. TraesCS4A02G095500 encodes an adenyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity that was related to signal transmission [44].

Interestingly, the relative expression levels of TraesCS4A03G0195700 and TraesCS4A03G0196500 were the highest in the kernel compared with other tissues (leaves, spike and root). The expression levels of TraesCS4A03G0193400 and TraesCS4A03G0193900 in kernel were not the highest, but their expression levels in kernels were almost the same as other tissues (Figure S4). In summary, the above four genes are the emphasis in our subsequent research of fine mapping and gene cloning.

Correlation between kernel traits

In this study, KL, KW and TKW were positively correlated in BLE18 across three environments. Notably, the correlation between KL and TKW, as well as between KW and TKW were positively significant (Table 2), which was consistent with previous studies [15, 34, 45,46,47].

Previous studies reported numerous co-located QTL for KL, KW and TKW. For example, QKL.sicau-2D for KL, QKW.sicau-2D for KW and QTKW.sicau-2D for TKW were co-located in the same interval. QKL.sicau-1A for KL and QTKW.sicau-1A for TKW were co-located, QKL.sicau-2B for KL and QTKW.sicau-2B for TKW were also co-located [15]. TaTKW-7AL for both TKW and KL were co-located on chromosome 7AL [13]. Interestingly, Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A had no genetic effect on KW and TKW (Figure S2 and Figure S3), and the QTL for KW and TKW were not identified in the same interval, which indicated that the QTL for KL may have different regulation mechanism in this study. Recently, Qu et al. (2021) also identified major QTL QKL.sicau-2SY-1B for KL, QKW.sicau-2SY-6D for KW, and QTKW.sicau-2SY-2D for TKW located on different chromosomes [16].

Additionally, we should notice that when analyzing effects of a QTL for a given trait on other traits, loci of these corresponding traits in lines harboring the given QTL should be excluded. Otherwise, real effect of a given QTL may be covered and cannot be detected. In our present study, only one major QTL for KL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) was detected. We also did not detect any QTL for KW and TKW in this interval, suggesting that loci for these two traits may be located in other intervals or chromosomes. Therefore, in our analysis of effects of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A on KW and TKW, the loci for KW and TKW mapped on other intervals may interfere the detection ability, resulting in no significant difference in KW or TKW between lines with the allele from BLS1 and that from 99E18 for Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A. We thus suggest that genome-wide analysis of loci for KL, KW and TKW could factually reveal their genetic correlations. Anyway, the major and novel QTL for KL identified in this study could be useful for dissecting mechanism of KL in the future and could have potential in breeding. Aggregating Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A with other loci/genes controlling KW may have significant effects on TKW.

The kernels are developed from the carpel during wheat flowering, and then the endosperm cells begin to divide and expand, following by the accumulation of starch and protein. KL and KW determined the kernel morphology. Larger kernel size was related to higher kernel weight [48].Thus, among many factors that constitute kernel weight, KL and KW play a vital role that cannot be ignored.

The feasibility of QTL mapping of quantitative traits using BSA and wheat 660 K SNP arrays in low generation populations

BSA has been widely used in wheat genetic mapping, and it is one of the effective methods to rapidly obtain target genes [18, 49, 50]. For species with large and complex genomes like wheat, it is a huge and laborious project to complete genome sequencing. Therefore, more convenient, faster and accurate methods are needed to improve the credibility of the results in mapping of wheat traits. So far, many studies have been using BSA combined with various sequencing methods to achieve gene localization [51, 52]. For example, the combination of BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array has been widely used for localization of interest genes especially for disease resistant loci. A major QTL (Qyrnap.nwafu-2BS) for stripe rust resistance was identified on chromosome arm 2BS following BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array analysis in an F2:3 population [19]. The early leaf senescence gene Els2 was mapped in an F2 population using BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP arrays [53]. However, a few studies had shown that BSA—660 K SNP arrays can be used to identify QTL for agronomic traits in low generations of wheat. Recently, a total of 48 QTL controlling spike-related traits located on 18 chromosomes were identified using BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array in genetic analysis of F2 and F2:3 populations [40]. Another example is that a novel reduced height gene was localized on chromosome arm 2DL using BSA—660 K SNP arrays in four F2 segregating populations [54]. In this study, two low-generation (F3) populations were used to rapidly identify and validate QTL related to KL. This method greatly improved the efficiency and shortened the time. Collectively, our results combined with previous studies suggested that QTL mapping of agronomic traits using BSA and the wheat 660 K SNP array in combination with linkage map analysis in low generation populations is a rapid and effective method.

Conclusion

A major, novel and stable QTL for KL, Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A, was identified in an F3 biparental population derived from the cross between BLS1 and 99E18, and further successfully validated using two flanking makers in another F3 biparental population across different environments. Four predicted genes related to kernel growth regulation were detected in the interval of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A. Furthermore, this study laid subsequent construction for fine mapping, mining candidate genes and researching on the molecular mechanism of KL regulation in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available in ‘Figshare’ with the identifiers data DOIs, including dataset 1 (the genotypes of BLE18 population, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19514173.v1), dataset 2 (the genetic map information in this study, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19514239.v1), dataset 3 (data of kernel traits of BLE18 in three environments, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19514248.v1), dataset 4 (data of kernel traits of BLSM3 in three environments, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19514254.v1) and dataset 5 (the genotyping results of two flanking markers of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A in BLSM3, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19514212.v1). Remaining data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

BSA:

Bulked Segregant Analysis

SNP:

A single nucleotide polymorphism

BLUP:

Best linear unbiased prediction

QTL:

Quantitative trait loci

KL:

Kernel length

KT:

Kernel thickness

KW:

Kernel width

HKW:

Hundred kernel weight

TKW:

Thousand kernel weight

AFLP:

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

SSR:

Simple sequence repeats

KASP:

Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR

PVE:

Phenotypic variance explained

LOD:

Logarithm of odds

Add:

Additive effect of a QTL

QE:

QTL × Environment

CS:

Chinese Spring

CZ:

Chongzhou

WJ:

Wenjiang

YA:

Ya’an

References

  1. Venske E, Dos Santos RS, Busanello C, Gustafson P, de Oliveira AC. Bread wheat: a role model for plant domestication and breeding. Hereditas. 2019;156(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohajdová Z, Karovicova J. Nutritional value and baking application of spelt wheat. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2008;7(3):5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruibal-Mendieta NL, Delacroix DL, Mignolet E, Pycke J-M, Marques C, Rozenberg R, et al. Spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta) as a source of breadmaking flours and bran naturally enriched in oleic acid and minerals but not phytic acid. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(7):2751–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dvorak J, Deal KR, Luo M-C, You FM, von Borstel K, Dehghani H. The Origin of Spelt and Free-Threshing Hexaploid Wheat. J Hered. 2012;103(3):426–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gegas VC, Nazari A, Griffiths S, Simmonds J, Fish L, Orford S, et al. A genetic framework for grain size and shape variation in wheat. Plant Cell. 2010;22(4):1046–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Breseghello F, Sorrells ME. QTL analysis of kernel size and shape in two hexaploid wheat mapping populations. Field Crops Res. 2007;101(2):172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang J, Zhou Y, Wu Q, Chen Y, Zhang P, Zhang YE, et al. Molecular characterization of a novel TaGL3–5A allele and its association with grain length in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(6):1799–814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y, Liu J, Xia X, He Z. TaGS-D1, an ortholog of rice OsGS3, is associated with grain weight and grain length in common wheat. Mol Breed. 2014;34(3):1097–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Doerge RW. Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(1):43–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell KG, Bergman CJ, Gualberto DG, Anderson JA, Giroux MJ, Hareland G, et al. Quantitative trait loci associated with kernel traits in a soft× hard wheat cross. Crop Sci. 1999;39(4):1184–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui F, Zhao C, Ding A, Li J, Wang L, Li X, et al. Construction of an integrative linkage map and QTL mapping of grain yield-related traits using three related wheat RIL populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(3):659–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Y, Kong Z, Wu X, Cheng R, Yu D, Ma Z. Characterization of three wheat grain weight QTLs that differentially affect kernel dimensions. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(12):2437–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Su Z, Jin S, Lu Y, Zhang G, Chao S, Bai G. Single nucleotide polymorphism tightly linked to a major QTL on chromosome 7A for both kernel length and kernel weight in wheat. Mol Breed. 2016;36(2):15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brinton J, Simmonds J, Minter F, Leverington-Waite M, Snape J, Uauy C. Increased pericarp cell length underlies a major quantitative trait locus for grain weight in hexaploid wheat. New Phytol. 2017;215(3):1026–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma J, Zhang H, Li S, Zou Y, Li T, Liu J, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for kernel traits in a wheat cultivar Chuannong16. BMC Genet. 2019;20(1):77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qu X, Liu J, Xie X, Xu Q, Tang H, Mu Y, et al. Genetic mapping and validation of loci for kernel-related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:667493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou J, Li C, You J, Tang H, Mu Y, Jiang Q, et al. Genetic identification and characterization of chromosomal regions for kernel length and width increase from tetraploid wheat. BMC Genom. 2021;22(1):706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli R. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. P Natl A Sci. 1991;88(21):9828–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu J, Wang Q, Liu S, Huang S, Mu J, Zeng Q, et al. Saturation mapping of a major effect QTL for stripe rust resistance on wheat chromosome 2B in cultivar Napo 63 using SNP genotyping arrays. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu H, Su W, Li X, Chao K, Wang M, Yue W, et al. Rapid mapping of a stripe rust resistance gene YrZl31 using bulked segregant a combined with high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. Crop Prot. 2020;134: 105174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun C, Dong Z, Zhao L, Ren Y, Zhang N, Chen F. The Wheat 660K SNP array demonstrates great potential for marker-assisted selection in polyploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(7):1635–1635.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li H, Wang Q, Xu L, Mu J, Wu J, Zeng Q, et al. Rapid identification of a major effect QTL conferring adult plant resistance to stripe rust in wheat cultivar Yaco “S.” Euphytica. 2017;213(6):124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pu Z, Hou Y, Zheng Y. SSR and storage protein difference analysis of new wheat varieties CN16 and 99E18. J Wheat Crops. 2004;3:25–8 ((in Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Su Z, Bernardo A, Tian B, Chen H, Wang S, Ma H, et al. A deletion mutation in TaHRC confers Fhb1 resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Nat Genet. 2019;51(7):1099–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simmonds J, Scott P, Brinton J, Mestre TC, Bush M, Del Blanco A, et al. A splice acceptor site mutation in TaGW2-A1 increases thousand grain weight in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat through wider and longer grains. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(6):1099–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Stein N, Herren G, Keller B. A new DNA extraction method for high-throughput marker analysis in a large-genome species such as Triticum aestivum. Plant Breed. 2001;120(4):354–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ertiro BT, Ogugo V, Worku M, Das B, Olsen M, Labuschagne M, et al. Comparison of Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) and genotyping by Specific (GBS) for quality control analysis in maize. BMC Genom. 2015;16:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu T, Wang L, Rimbert H, Rodriguez JC, Deal KR, De Oliveira R, et al. Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly Plant J. 2021;107(1):303–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goddard M. A mixed model for analyses of data on multiple genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;83(6–7):878–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Ribaut J-M, Li Z, Wang J. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;116(2):243–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu T, Wang L, Rodriguez JC, Deal KR, Avni R, Distelfeld A. Improved Genome Sequence of Wild Emmer Wheat Zavitan with the Aid of Optical Maps. G3 (Bethesda). 2019;9(3):619–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma S, Wang M, Wu J, Guo W, Chen Y, Li G, et al. WheatOmics: a platform combining multiple omics data to accelerate functional genomics studies in wheat. Mol Plant. 2021;S1674–2052(1621):00430–5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manickavelu A, Kawaura K, Imamura H, Mori M, Ogihara Y. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for domestication traits and beta-glucan content in a wheat recombinant inbred line population. Euphytica. 2011;177(2):179–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohler V, Albrecht T, Castell A, Diethelm M, Schweizer G, Hartl L. Considering causal genes in the genetic dissection of kernel traits in common wheat. J Appl Genet. 2016;57(4):467–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun X, Wu K, Zhao Y, Kong F, Han G, Jiang H-M, et al. QTL analysis of kernel shape and weight using recombinant inbred lines in wheat. Euphytica. 2009;165(3):615–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumari S, Jaiswal V, Mishra VK, Paliwal R, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. QTL mapping for some grain traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018;24(5):909–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen W, Sun D, Yan X, Li R, Wang S, Shi Y, et al. QTL analysis of wheat kernel traits, and genetic effects of qKW-6A on kernel width. Euphytica. 2019;215(2):11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ren T, Fan T, Chen S, Li C, Chen Y, Ou X, et al. Utilization of a Wheat55K SNP array-derived high-density genetic map for high-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci for important kernel-related traits in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(3):807–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams K, Sorrells ME. Three-dimensional seed size and shape QTL in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations. Crop Sci. 2014;54(1):98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cao P, Liang X, Zhao H, Feng B, Xu E, Wang L, et al. Identification of the quantitative trait loci controlling spike-related traits in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta. 2019;250(6):1967–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Suchowilska E, Wiwart M, Krska R, Kandler W. Do Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum spelta L. Hybrids Constitute a Promising Source Material for Quality Breeding of New Wheat Varieties? Agronomy 2020;10(1):43.

  42. Gosti F, Beaudoin N, Serizet C, Webb AA, Vartanian N, Giraudat J. ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 1999;11(10):1897–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dräger B. Tropinone reductases, enzymes at the branch point of tropane alkaloid metabolism. Phytochemistry. 2006;67(4):327–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Manadas BJ, Vougas K, Fountoulakis M, Duarte CB. Sample sonication after trichloroacetic acid precipitation increases protein recovery from cultured hippocampal neurons, and improves resolution and reproducibility in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 2006;27(9):1825–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cui F, Ding A, Li J, Zhao C, Li X, Feng D, et al. Wheat kernel dimensions: how do they contribute to kernel weight at an individual QTL level? J Genet. 2011;90(3):409–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang G, Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhao Y, Kong F, Li S. Characterization and mapping of QTLs on chromosome 2D for grain size and yield traits using a mutant line induced by EMS in wheat. Crop J. 2015;3(2):135–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yan L, Liang F, Xu H, Zhang X, Zhai H, Sun Q, et al. Identification of QTL for grain size and shape on the D genome of natural and synthetic allohexaploid wheats with near-identical AABB genomes. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie Q, Mayes S, Sparkes DL. Carpel size, grain filling, and morphology determine individual grain weight in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(21):6715–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Shen X, Zhou M, Lu W, Ohm H. Detection of Fusarium head blight resistance QTL in a wheat population using bulked segregant analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;106(6):1041–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shi X, Wu P, Hu J, Qiu D, Qu Y, Li Y, et al. Molecular characterization of adult plant resistance loci against powdery mildew in winter wheat cultivar Liangxing 99 using BSR-Seq technology. Plant Dis. 2021.

  51. Pickrell JK, Marioni JC, Pai AA, Degner JF, Engelhardt BE, Nkadori E, et al. Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7289):768–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Rowland O, Ludwig AA, Merrick CJ, Baillieul F, Tracy FE, Durrant WE, et al. Functional analysis of Avr9/Cf-9 rapidly elicited genes identifies a protein kinase, ACIK1, that is essential for full Cf-9-dependent disease resistance in tomato. Plant Cell. 2005;17(1):295–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang N, Xie Y, Li Y, Wu S, Li S, Guo Y, et al. High-resolution mapping of the novel early leaf senescence gene Els2 in common wheat. Plants. 2020;9(6):698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhou C, Xiong H, Li Y, Guo H, Xie Y, Zhao L, et al. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of a novel reduced height gene in common height (Triticum aestivum L.). J Integr Agr. 2020;19(7):1721–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971937 and 31970243), the Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2021YJ0503), and the International Science and Technology Cooperation and Exchanges Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2022YFH0053 and 2021YFH0083).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xinlin Xie and Shuiqin Li contributed equally to this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Xinlin Xie, Shuiqin Li & Hang Liu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Qiang Xu, Huaping Tang, Yang Mu, Mei Deng, Qiantao Jiang, Guoyue Chen, Pengfei Qi, Yuming Wei, Youliang Zheng, Xiujin Lan & Jian Ma

  3. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, China

    Wei Li & Zhien Pu

  4. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, 9208, Bangladesh

    Ahsan Habib

Authors
  1. Xinlin Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuiqin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huaping Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mei Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiantao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Guoyue Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pengfei Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhien Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ahsan Habib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuming Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Youliang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Xiujin Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jian Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XLX and SQL performed the research and participated in drafting this manuscript. HL, QX and HPT participated in phenotype measurement and data analysis. YM, MD and QTJ assisted with data collection and analysis. GYC, and PFQ performed data processing and QTL analysis. WL, ZEP and AH and discussed results and revised the manuscript. YMW and YLZ participated in data analysis, QTL validation and discussion of results. XJL initiated the project, guided the study, and revised the manuscript. JM designed the experiments, guided the entire study, participated in data analysis, wrote and extensively revised this manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiujin Lan or Jian Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The wheat accessions (BLS1, 99E18 and Sumai3) materials used in the experiment were supplied by Triticeae Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University. The plant materials are maintained in accordance with the institutional guidelines of Triticeae Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University, China. Experimental research and field studies on plants, including the collection of plant material, complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. Furthermore, this article did not contain any studies with human participants or animals and did not involve any endangered or protected species. All experiments and data analyses were conducted in Sichuan. All authors contributed to the study and approved the final version for submission. The manuscript has not been submitted to any other journal.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Kernel phenotypes of BLS1 and Sumai3.Scale bar = 1cm. Table S1. The statistics of linesused and not used for trait investigation in BLE18 in Ya’an. Table S2. The primers used in this study. Table S3. Correlation of KL between differentenvironments in BLE18 and BLSM3 populations. Figure S2. Effect of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4Aon kernel width a and thousand kernel weight b in BLE18 population. WJ, Wenjiang;CZ, Chongzhou; YA, Ya’an. Table S4. QTLfor KL detected in QTL-environment (QE) interaction analysis. Figure S3. Effect of Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A on kernel widthand thousand kernel weight in BLSM3 population. WJ, Wenjiang; CZ, Chongzhou; YA, Ya’an. Table  S5. QTL for KL identified on 4A chromosome fromprevious studies. Bold font, QTL obtained in this experiment; N,information could not be found. Table S6. Gene annotation of the major QTL (Qkl.sicau-BLE18-4A) interval onChinese Spring physical map. Figure S4. The relative expression levelsof genes possibly related to kernel development in different organs. Transverseaxis is different parts of plants, from left to right are roots, leaves andkernels. Transverse axis is the expression level.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, X., Li, S., Liu, H. et al. Identification and validation of a major QTL for kernel length in bread wheat based on two F3 biparental populations. BMC Genomics 23, 386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08608-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08608-3

Keywords

  • Kernel length
  • BSA-660 K SNP array
  • QTL identification and validation
  • F3 biparental populations

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us