Skip to main content
Download PDF

Application of RNA sequencing to understand the response of rice seedlings to salt-alkali stress

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 21 (2023) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 12 May 2023

A Correction to this article was published on 03 February 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Salt-alkali stress represents one of the most stressful events with deleterious consequences for plant growth and crop productivity. Despite studies focusing on the effects of salt-alkali stress on morphology and physiology, its molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we employed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) to understand how Na2CO3 stress inhibits rice seedling growth.

Results

Na2CO3 stress significantly inhibited the growth of rice seedlings. Through RNA-seq, many differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were shown to be potentially involved in the rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress. After 1-day and 5-day treatments, RNA-seq identified 1780 and 2315 DEGs in the Na2CO3-treated versus -untreated rice seedling shoots, respectively. According to the gene ontology enrichment and the Kyoto Encylopedia of Genes and Genomes annotation of DEGs, the growth-inhibition processes associated with salt-alkali stress involve a myriad of molecular events, including biosynthesis and metabolism, enzyme activity, and binding, etc.

Conclusion

Collectively, the transcriptome analyses in the present work revealed several potential key regulators of plant response to salt-alkali stress, and might pave a way to improve salt-alkali stress tolerance in rice.

Peer Review reports

Background

Salt-alkali stress has been emerging as a severe threat to the plant growth and crop productivity. It is reported that there are more than 1 billion hm2 salinization-alkalization lands worldwide [1]. Soil salinization and alkalization can produce a multitude of harmful effects on plants, including osmotic pressure, high pH stress and disrupt ionic balance [2, 3], thereby impeding plant growth, development and yield [4, 5].

Rice represents the second most crucial cereal after the wheat [6], and provides the primary source of calorie to a large fraction population globally [7,8,9]. However, rice displays poor salt-alkali resistance, especially at the early seedling stage [10, 11]. Previous researches have demonstrated that the rice seedlings under salt-alkali stress grew slowly and suffered from a significant decrease in chlorophyll content, cell membrane stability, and relative water content (RWC) [12]. Moreover, our previous work established that salt-alkali stress led to a series of functional abnormalities in rice seedlings, including photosynthetic capacity, ROS equilibrium, antioxidant system, organic acid and mineral element metabolism [13,14,15]. However, the definite molecular events of rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress are largely unknown.

At present, advances in molecular/omics/sequencing technology have been opening new paths for investigating the impacts of environmental stress on plants, and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is one of the rapid development technologies [16]. RNA-seq has been used extensively due to its ability to provide efficient, rapid, and comprehensive transcript information [17]. A previous study reported that comparative transcriptomic analysis of two Vicia sativa L. cultivars could reveal the crucial role of metal transporters in cadmium tolerance [18]. Baldoni et al. [19] applied RNA-seq for investigating major differences in the root early responses to osmotic stress. A study by Xu and colleagues [20] discovered the molecular mechanisms behind cotton response to salt stress through a comprehensive transcriptome analysis. In the present work, we focused on the molecular players involved in rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress by utilizing RNA-seq. Our findings provide the theoretical basis for crop response to salt-alkali stress.

Results

Phenotype and growth parameters

In response to Na2CO3 treatment, fresh weight and RWC of rice seedling shoots presented a significant inhibition (Fig. 1A, B, F, J), while plant height and dry weight did not change significantly at day 1 (Fig. 1E, I). The growth-inhibition in rice seedlings was more pronounced upon 5 d of Na2CO3 treatment (Fig. 1C, D, G, H, K, L). These findings confirmed an adverse effect of salt-alkali stress on plants.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The growth of Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedlings. Gross inspection of N + versus N- rice seedling shoots at day 1 (A, B), day 5 (C, D). Statistical analysis for plant height (E), fresh weight (F), dry weight (I) and relative water content (J) from N + versus N- rice seedling shoots at day 1. Statistical analysis for plant height (G), fresh weight (H), dry weight (K) and relative water content (L) from N + versus N- rice seedling shoots at day 5

Full size image

General transcriptomic profiling

After filtering low-quality reads and trimming adapters, approximately 88 gigabases of clean reads were used for assembly and analysis, and the Q30 base percentage was greater than 93.87% (Supplementary material 1: Table S1). The ratio mapped to the japonica genome were 95.24-95.94% (Supplementary material 1: Table S2). After 1-day or 5-day treatment, differential expression analysis was performed in the Na2CO3-treated versus -untreated rice seedling shoots. Results showed compared with 1-day treatment, the 5-day Na2CO3 treatment elicited a greater number of DEGs (Fig. 2A, B). Spearman correlation and principal component analysis demonstrated good similarity of biological replicates under the same condition, and discriminated samples with different treatments (Fig. 2C, D, E, F). Additionally, 6 up-regulated and 4 down-regulated genes were randomly selected to validate RNA-seq accuracy through qRT-PCR. Results showed that the RNA-seq data matched well with the RNA-seq qRT-PCR findings (Supplementary material 1: Fig. S1, Table S3). Taken together, we concluded that the RNA-seq could reliably identify genes that participated in rice seedling response to Na2CO3 treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

RNA-seq results for Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots. Ridgeline plots, principal component analysis (PCA) and heatmaps using DEGs obtained from N + versus N- shoots at day 1 (A, C, E) and day 5 (B, D, F)

Full size image

DEGs evaluation and bioinformatic analysis in Na2CO3 treatment on day 1

A total of 1780 DEGs were identified upon one day of Na2CO3 treatment in the rice seedling shoots. Among these genes, 753 up-regulated and 1027 down-regulated genes were found (Fig. 3A, Supplementary material 2: Table S4). The top 15 up- and down-regulated genes were presented in Fig. 4A. According to the gene ontology (GO) enrichment annotation of the 1780 DEGs, BP terms showed that the DEGs were enriched mainly in metabolic process, cellular process, biological regulation and response to stimulus, specifically, in oxidation-reduction process, carbohydrate metabolic process, photosynthesis, and response to light stimulus. Among CC terms, the process of cell, organelle and membrane was enriched by 1015, 830 and 602 DEGs, respectively. Out of MF terms, the process of catalytic activity and binding had the most abundant functions; in detail, the DEGs were involved in heme binding, iron ion binding and hydrolase activity (Fig. 5A). Based on the Kyoto Encylopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment annotation of the 1780 DEGs, 15 pathways were significantly enriched such as photosynthesis (ko00195), nitrogen metabolism (ko00910), glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism (ko00630), carbon metabolism (ko01200) and carotenoid biosynthesis (ko00906), etc. (Fig. 6A, B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Volcano plots of DEGs in Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) shoots at day 1 (A) and day 5 (B). Significantly up- and down-regulated genes were represented by red and green dots, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Top 15 up- (yellow) and 15 down-regulated (blue) genes in Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) shoots at day 1 (A) and day 5 (B). The first lap indicates the names of 15 top up- and down-regulated genes. The second lap indicates the fold change in N + versus N- rice seedling shoots. The third lap indicates larger circle presented larger fold change. The fourth and fifth lap show the mean FPKM of N- and N+, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

GO enrichment analysis for DEGs in Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots at day 1 (A) and day 5 (B)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

KEGG enrichment analysis for DEGs in Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots at day 1 (A, B) and day 5 (C, D). A, C DEGs enrichment in KEGG related to cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, metabolism and organismal systems. B, D The significantly enriched KEGG pathways

Full size image

DEGs evaluation and bioinformatic analysis in Na2CO3 treatment on day 5

In the Na2CO3-treated versus -untreated rice seedling shoots, long-term stress (5 d treatment) resulted in 2315 DEGs, including 982 up- and 1333 down-regulated genes (Fig. 3B, Supplementary material 2: Table S5). The top 15 up- and down-regulated genes were displayed in Fig. 4B. On the basis of 2315 DEGs, GO enrichment annotation was performed. The significantly enriched BP terms mainly included metabolic process, cellular process, biological regulation, response to stimulus, specifically, in chitin-catabolic process, oxidation-reduction process, carbohydrate metabolic process, regulation of jasmonic acid mediated signaling pathway, iron ion homeostasis. Among CC terms, the number of DEGs enriched in the process of cell, organelle and membrane was greatest, especially in plasma membrane and cytoplasm. Out of MF terms, catalytic activity and binding had the most abundant functions; in detail, the DEGs took effects in iron ion binding, heme binding and monooxygenase activity (Fig. 5B). KEGG enrichment annotation of 2315 DEGs demonstrated that 454 DEGs were enriched in 110 pathways. The significantly enriched KEGG pathways also included carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms (ko00710), plant-pathogen interaction (ko04626), carbon metabolism (ko01200), nitrogen metabolism (ko00910), vitamin B6 metabolism (ko00750), starch and sucrose metabolism (ko00500), etc. (Fig. 6C, D).

Overlapped DEGs, GO terms and pathways between the 1 d and 5 d treatment

A total of 405 overlapped DEGs associated with rice seedling response to Na2CO3 treatment were identified between the 1 d and 5 d treatment (Supplementary material 1: Fig. S2A). Among these genes, 341 genes (175 up-regulated and 166 down-regulated) displayed the same changing pattern (Supplementary material 1: Table S6, S7). A further increased expression in response to 5 d versus 1 d treatment was found in 69 of the 175 up-regulated genes (Supplementary material 1: Table S6 ). Among these 166 down-regulated genes, the expression levels of 72 genes were further decreased upon 5 d versus 1 d treatment (Supplementary material 1: Table S7). These findings suggested long-term Na2CO3 treatment enhanced the effects on the genes. In addition, 64 DEGs had an opposite expression pattern between the 1 d and 5 d treatment (Supplementary material 1: Fig. S2B); that is, 48 genes were up-regulated at day 1 and down-regulated at day 5; 16 genes were down-regulated at day 1 and up-regulated at day 5. These genes might play pleiotropic roles in rice response to salt-alkali stress.

In addition, the short-term and long-term salt-alkali stress shared 39 common GO terms (Supplementary material 1: Table S8) and 8 KEGG pathways (Supplementary material 1: Table S9), including oxalate oxidase activity (GO:0050162), oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114), thiamine biosynthetic process (GO:0009228), brassinosteroid biosynthetic process (GO:0016132), etc.

Discussion

Crops are often subjected to severe abiotic stress such as water deficit [21,22,23], salinity [24,25,26], heavy metal exposure [27,28,29], etc. Thus, understanding how plants respond to these stresses is helpful to improve crop productivity. Our findings here and previous studies [13] confirmed the inhibition of growth of rice seedlings under salt-alkali stress. In this work, we used RNA-seq to investigate the molecular players behind rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress.

Salt-alkali stress-induced plant responses are orchestrated by a complex network of cross-talk between signaling pathways and sensors. This work demonstrated that salt-alkali stress caused many DEGs associated with oxalate oxidase (OxO) that catalyzes the oxidative breakdown of oxalate to H2O2 and CO2 [30]. Previous studies reported that abiotic stresses of salinity [31], heat, and heavy metal ions [32] could increase OxO gene expression and/or OxO activation. In line with these results, this work found that OsOxO1, OsOxO3, and OsOxO4 were up-regulated upon 1 d and 5 d treatment. Previous work demonstrated an increase in H2O2 content in response to salt-alkali stress [15]. In agreement, we found that salt-alkali stress elicited an increase in the expression of OsOxO1, OsOxO3 and OsOxO4 that participated in H2O2 metabolism.

Glutaredoxins (GRXs) are a class of oxidoreductase which are reduced by glutathione [33, 34], and exert various functions in plants, such as regulation of [Fe-S] assembly, Krebs cycle, Calvin cycle and signaling pathway, plant response to phytohormones, etc. [35]. Previous studies demonstrated silencing the expression of GRXs genes in plants reduced tolerance to abiotic stress, whereas overexpression of GRXs genes exhibited an opposite function [36,37,38]. In line with this, we identified 4 down-regulated GRX genes (OsGRX23, OsGRX24, OsGRX28, OsGRX29) might be involved in rice seedling response to Na2CO3 treatment. These findings were further confirmed by a study by Garg and co-workers [33]. Given the functions of GRXs genes in plants, we concluded that down-regulation of OsGRX23, OsGRX24, OsGRX28, OsGRX29 might contribute to the rice sensitivity to salt-alkali stress.

Thiamine is an important factor in the activity of several enzymes associated with major metabolic pathways, including the Krebs cycle, the pentose phosphate pathway, the branched-chain amino acid pathway, anaerobic respiration, and pigment biosynthesis [39]. Moreover, thiamine was found to correlate with disease resistance in plants [39]. The present work indicated that 3 genes (Os03g0679700, Os07g0190000, OsXNP) associated with plant response to salt-alkali stress were enriched in the thiamine biosynthetic process. These genes are associated with thiamine metabolism, which might contribute to rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress.

Brassinosteroid (BRs) are steroid hormones that are essential for plant growth and development. These hormones are able to regulate cell division, cell elongation, xylem differentiation, reproduction, photomorphogenesis and stress response [40, 41]. Accordingly, abnormalities in genes encoding the main components of the BR synthesis and signaling pathways could result in severe dwarfism, impaired organ growth and development, and limited plant fertility and yield [41]. This study demonstrated that 4 genes correlating with rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress were enriched in the brassinosteroid biosynthetic process. Among these 4 genes, 3 genes (Os12g0139300, Os11g0143200, OsABA8ox1) and 1 gene (Os07g0519600) were down-regulated and up-regulated in both 1 d and 5 d treatment, respectively. These 4 DEGs maybe play key roles in the growth limitation of rice seedlings in response to salt-alkali stress.

Photosynthesis is a crucial biological process which could often be influenced by abiotic stress [42]. Our previous work reported that Na2CO3 stress could result in significant decrease in chlorophylls and carotenoid contents in rice under [13]. Furthermore, the present work showed 28 DEGs at day 1 were enriched in photosynthesis, and all genes were down-regulated except Os07g0147900 encoding putative encoding ferredoxin-NADP reductase. Out of these 28 genes, the deletion of YGL8 [43], LYL1 [44], chl9 [45], OsFdC2 [46] or OsFd1 [47], was clearly found to decrease the chlorophylls content, thereby resulting in leaves yellow. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that Os07g0147900 and Os01g0934400 were up- and down-regulated at day 5, and 10 DEGs were enriched in photosynthesis on day 5. Out of the 10 genes, OsPS1-F deletion was found to promote yellow-green leaves [48]. Therefore, we concluded that these dysregulated genes might be involved in the regulation of chlorophyll content and photosynthesis.

Because significant responses to salt-alkali stress were detected in the above-ground tissues, this study used the shoots to understand the response of rice seedlings to salt-alkali stress. Our findings suggested that the growth-inhibition of rice seedling following Na2CO3 treatment might be a cumulative outcome of differential expression of genes. Further clarification of the dynamic process of Na2CO3 treatment in rice seedlings is the footing stone to determine whether the affected expression of genes in the above-ground tissues is a direct result of Na2CO3 treatment, or a subsequent consequence of the effects of Na2CO3 treatment on the below-ground tissues. Given the global changes in the transcriptome in response to abiotic stress [49, 50], there is likely to have genes with similar or opposite expression pattern in the shoots versus roots. It is of great interest to investigate that the genes have similar or different roles in the shoots and roots.

According to our current results, gene expression change in response to salt-alkali stress could be seen in the above-ground tissues of rice seedlings. In line with our previous descriptions [10, 15], the rice seedlings are sensitive to salt-alkali stress, as demonstrated by the findings that 10mM Na2CO3 treatment could lead to a significant change in their phenotypes and growth parameters. Yet it remains unclear whether 10mM Na2CO3 treatment could have effects on the salt-alkali tolerant rice variety. Since different rice varieties might have different responses, whether the gene changes in response to salt-alkali stress is unique for salt-alkali sensitive rice variety remains an important knowledge gap in our understanding of this area. Furthermore, although the one and five days of Na2CO3 treatments were used in this study, further efforts are needed to show whether the two time points could truly reflect the short-term and long-term responses to salt-alkali stress.

At the two sampled time points, the rice seedling shoots were found to have 341 DEGs with the same expression pattern. Of additional interest, our experimental data demonstrated that Na2CO3 at the two post-treatment sampling time points resulted in 64 DEGs with an opposite expression change. This pattern suggested that the growth-inhibition processes of Na2CO3 treatment were dynamic and discriminating. Different genes might play similar roles in one specific system, and one gene might take effect in different systems. The functions of these genes are important points in future studies that focus on the molecular level responses of rice to salt-alkali stress.

This work used transcriptomic analysis to identify molecular players related to the responses of rice seedlings to salt-alkaline stress. This is an area where essentially descriptive work might still be needed to serve as a basis for more theoretical/ explanatory work by others. We assume that the “forest” is how growth-inhibition of rice seedlings occurs under salt-alkaline stress, and thus this work tried to uncover the “forest” by RNA-seq. The data contributes to advance the understanding of the abiotic stress-plant interactions by identifying many genes and their functions that are potentially involved in the growth-inhibitory responses of rice seedlings to salt-alkaline stress. This is a study about “trees” with some insights into the “forest”. The biochemical or physiological features from RNA-seq data need to be confirmed by future studies.

Conclusion

Understanding the molecular mechanism whereby crops respond to salt-alkali stress is an important step to increase the salt-alkali tolerance of plants. This study presents an overview of rice seedling response to salt-alkali stress. Our data provide a solid foundation for future studies to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the response to salt-alkali stress in plants.

Materials and methods

Rice materials and treatment

After hybridizing Liaojing 454 with Shennong 9017, the cultivar Liaoxing NO.1 belonging to japonica subspecies was obtained by Liaoning Provincial Crop Variety Certification Committee. Based on the identified effects of salt-alkali stress on Liaoxing NO.1 [13,14,15], this cultivar was selected for measuring growth indexes and transcriptome profiling. After surface-sterilization, rice seeds were imbibed in deionized water (28 °C/ 24 h), and were transferred to filter paper which had been moistened by deionized water for germinating (30 °C/ 24 h). Subsequently, the germinated seeds were cultivated in 500 ml beaker which contained Hoagland solution in a growth chamber (80% relative humidity, 16 h light 10,000 lx at 28 °C and 8 h dark at 26 °C). Based on our previous findings [51], Na2CO3-treated rice seedlings were chosen for the transcriptomic analysis on day 1 and day 5 after the treatments in the present study. After 4 d of growth, rice seedlings were subjected to 0 and 10 mM Na2CO3 treatment. Fresh shoot samples were collected after 1 d and 5 d treatments, respectively. Each treatment was repeated for three times.

Analysis of growth indexes

After exposure to 1 d and 5 d Na2CO3 treatment, rice seedlings were collected to measure shoot length, fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW). Dry weight was determined after drying them at 80 °C for 12 h. RWC = (FW-DW) ×100/FW [52, 53].

RNA extraction and sequencing

At similar time points after 1 d and 5 d of Na2CO3 treatment, rice seedling shoots were collected, immediately frozen and stored at -80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the RNA isolation Kit RN40 (Aidlab Bio Co Ltd, Beijing). The purity and concentration of extracted RNA were checked on a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE), and the RNA integrity was verified by the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). The preparation of cDNA library was done using quality-controlled RNA samples and then was subjected to sequencing on HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, CA, USA).

Data processing and bioinformatic analysis

Low-quality bases and adapter sequences were removed from the raw data, and high-quality data of RNA-seq were mapped to the japonica reference genome (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/) using HISAT2 (version 2.0.4). Transcript expression levels were estimated using fragments per kilobase per million reads (FPKM) values that were calculated according to the previously described formula [54, 55]. Based on the FPKM values, differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 (version 1.6.3), and genes showing fold changes (FC) ≥ 1.5 with a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.01 were considered to be differentially expressed.

Gene Ontology analysis was performed using the GOseq R packages for the enrichment analysis. The functional annotation of DEGs was reflected in three major GO classification: Cellular component (CC), Biological process (BP), and Molecular function (MF). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were conducted to identify the biological pathways associated with rice seedling response to Na2CO3 stress. The statistical test for GO and KEGG analysis was Fisher’s Exact, and P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Quantitative real time PCR analysis

Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a LightCycler 96 Sequence Detection system (Roche Co., Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). cDNA was synthesized from rice RNA using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan). Primers were designed on NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and synthesized from Sangon Biotech (Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The primers used in this work were listed in Table S10. 18s rRNA was quantified as an internal control and the relative expression of target gene mRNA was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

Statistical analysis

All of parameters were repeated thrice. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-tailed Student’s t-test was performed to test the effects of Na2CO3 treatment. SPSS 16.0. and GraphPad Prism (Version 8) performed all statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequences were deposited into Sequence Read Archive database with the BioProject under the accession number PRJNA895747 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA895747).

Change history

References

  1. Zhang K, Tang J, Wang Y, Kang H, Zeng J. The tolerance to saline-alkaline stress was dependent on the roots in wheat. Physiol Mol Biol Plant. 2020;26:947–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00799-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuamnakthong S, Nampei M, Ueda A. Characterization of Na+ exclusion mechanism in rice under saline-alkaline stress conditions. Plant Sci. 2019;287:110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X, Xie X, Zheng C, Wei L, Li X, Jin Y, et al. RNAi-mediated suppression of the abscisic acid catabolism gene OsABA8ox1 increases abscisic acid content and tolerance to saline-alkaline stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop J. 2022;10:354–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koffler BE, Luschin-Ebengreuth N, Zechmann B. Compartment specific changes of the antioxidative status in Arabidopsis thaliana during salt stress. J Plant Biol. 2015;58:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-014-0264-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Wu Z, Chen Y, Yang C, Shi D. Effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth and ion balance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil Environ. 2011;57(6):286–94. https://doi.org/10.17221/36/2011-PSE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kordrostami M, Rabiei B, Kumleh HH. Different physiobiochemical and transcriptomic reactions of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in terms of salt sensitivity under salinity stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:7184–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8411-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Das P, Manna I, Biswas AK, Bandyopadhyay M. Exogenous silicon alters ascorbate-glutathione cycle in two salt-stressed indica rice cultivars (MTU 1010 and Nonabokra). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:26625–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2659-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma X, Xia H, Liu Y, Wei H, Zheng X, Song C, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic studies disclose key metabolism pathways contributing to well-maintained photosynthesis under the drought and consequent drought-tolerance in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang H, Takano T, Liu S. Screening and evaluation of saline-alkaline tolerant germplasm of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in soda saline-alkali soil. Agronomy. 2018;8:205. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li XM, Chen MJ, Li J, Ma LJ, Bu N, Li YY, et al. Effect of endophyte infection on chlorophyll α fluorescence in salinity stressed rice. Biol Plant. 2014;58:589–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-014-0428-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun J, Xie D, Zhang E, Zheng H, Wang J, Liu H, et al. QTL mapping of photosynthetic-related traits in rice under salt and alkali stresses. Euphytica. 2019;215:147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2470-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei LX, Lv BS, Wang MM, Ma HY, Yang HY, Liu XL, et al. Priming effect of abscisic acid on alkaline stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2015;90:50–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.03.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bu N, Li X, Li Y, Ma C, Ma L, Zhang C. Effects of Na2CO3 stress on photosynthesis and antioxidative enzymes in endophyte infected and non-infected rice. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2012;78:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.11.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Ma L, Bu N, Li YY, Zhang LH. Endophytic infection modifies organic acid and mineral element accumulation by rice under Na2CO3 stress. Plant Soil. 2017;420:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3378-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren XN, Shan Y, Li X, Wang LL, Li YY, Ma LJ, et al. Endophytic infection programs the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Na2CO3 stress. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2021;19(3):1895–907. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1903_18951907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao X, Li C, Wan S, Zhang T, Yan C, Shan S. Transcriptomic analysis and discovery of genes in the response of Arachis hypogaea to drought stress. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45:119–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4145-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dang Z, Zheng L, Wang J, Gao Z, Wu S, Qi Z, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of the salt-stress response in the wild recretohalophyte Reaumuria trigyna. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rui H, Zhang X, Shinwari KI, Zheng L, Shen Z. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of two Vicia sativa L. varieties with contrasting responses to cadmium stress reveals the important role of metal transporters in cadmium tolerance. Plant Soil. 2018;423:241–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3501-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baldoni E, Bagnaresi P, Locatelli F, Mattana M, Genga A. Comparative leaf and root transcriptomic analysis of two rice japonica cultivars reveals major differences in the root early response to osmotic stress. Rice. 2016;9:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0098-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu P, Guo Q, Meng S, Zhang X, Shen X. Genome-wide association analysis reveals genetic variations and candidate genes associated with salt tolerance related traits in Gossypium hirsutum. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07321-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson SM, Lim FL, Finkler A, Fromm H, Slabas AR, Knight MR. Transcriptomic analysis of Sorghum bicolor responding to combined heat and drought stress. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu C, Xia C, Xia Z, Zhou X, Huang J, Huang Z, et al. Physiological and transcriptomic responses of reproductive stage soybean to drought stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2018;37:1611–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-018-2332-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. You J, Zhang Y, Liu A, Li D, Wang X, Dossa K, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of drought-tolerant and susceptible sesame genotypes in response to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1880-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Amaral MN, Arge LWP, Benitez LC, Danielowski R, Silveira SFS, Farias DR, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of rice plants under cold, iron, and salt stresses. Funct Integr Genomic. 2016;16:567–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-016-0507-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansouri M, Naghavi MR, Alizadeh H, Mohammadi-Nejad G, Mousavi SA, Salekdeh GH, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii during long-term salinity stress. Funct Integr Genomic. 2019;19:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-018-0623-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Osthoff A, Rose PD, Baldauf JA, Piepho HP, Hochholdinger F. Transcriptomic reprogramming of barley seminal roots by combined water deficit and salt stress. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:325. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5634-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubey S, Misra P, Dwivedi S, Chatterjee S, Bag SK, Mantri S, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic shifts in rice roots in response to Cr (VI) stress. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:648. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Evers D, Legay S, Lamoureux D, Hausman JF, Hoffmann L, Renaut J. Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Mol Biol. 2012;78:503–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9879-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yue J, Zhang X, Liu N. Cadmium permeates through calcium channels and activates transcriptomic complexity in wheat roots in response to cadmium stress. Genes Genom. 2017;39:183–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-016-0488-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Li XC, Liao YY, Leung DWM, Wang HY, Chen BL, Peng XX, et al. Divergent biochemical and enzymatic properties of oxalate oxidase isoforms encoded by four similar genes in rice. Phytochemistry. 2015;118:216–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.08.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hurkman W, Tanaka CK. Effect of salt stress on germin gene expression in barley roots. Plant Physiol. 1996;110:971–7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.3.971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Valentovičová K, Halušková Ľ, Huttová J, Mistrík I, Tamás L. Effect of heavy metals and temperature on the oxalate oxidase activity and lignification of metaxylem vessels in barley roots. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;66:457–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Garg R, Jhanwar S, Tyagi AK, Jain M. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis suggest diverse roles of glutaredoxin gene family members during development and response to various stimuli in rice. DNA Res. 2010;17:353–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsq023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer Y, Siala W, Bashandy T, Riondet C, Vignols F, Reichheld JP. Glutaredoxins and thioredoxins in plants. BBA-Mol Cell Res. 2008;1783:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.10.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Verma PK, Verma S, Tripathi RD, Pandey N, Chakrabarty D. CC-type glutaredoxin, OsGrx_C7 plays a crucial role in enhancing protection against salt stress in rice. J Biotechnol. 2021;329:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.02.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo Y, Huang C, Xie Y, Song F, Zhou X. A tomato glutaredoxin gene SlGRX1 regulates plant responses to oxidative, drought and salt stresses. Planta. 2010;232:1499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1271-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Morita S, Yamashita Y, Fujiki M, Todaka R, Nishikawa Y, Hosoki A, et al. Expression of a rice glutaredoxin in aleurone layers of developing and mature seeds: subcellular localization and possible functions in antioxidant defense. Planta. 2015;242:1195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2354-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verma PK, Verma S, Tripathi RD, Chakrabarty D. A rice glutaredoxin regulate the expression of aquaporin genes and modulate root responses to provide arsenic tolerance. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2020;195:110471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang G, Ding X, Yuan M, Qiu D, Li X, Xu C. Dual function of rice OsDR8 gene in disease resistance that thiamine accumulation. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;60:437–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-4770-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nolan TM, Vukašinović N, Liu D, Russinova E, Yin Y. Brassinosteroids: multidimensional regulators of plant growth, development, and stress responses. Plant Cell. 2020;32:295–318. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Planas-Riverola A, Gupta A, Betegón-Putze I, Bosch N, Ibañes M, Caño-Delgado AI. Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress. Development. 2019;146:dev151894. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot. 2009;103:551–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kong W, Yu X, Chen H, Liu L, Xiao Y, Wang Y, et al. The catalytic subunit of magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl ester cyclase forms a chloroplast complex to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2016;92:177–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0513-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou Y, Gong Z, Yang Z, Yuan Y, Zhu J, Wang M, et al. Mutation of the light-induced yellow leaf 1 gene, which encodes a geranylgeranyl reductase, affects chlorophyll biosynthesis and light sensitivity in rice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.007529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang H, Li J, Yoo JH, Yoo SC, Cho SH, Koh HJ, et al. Rice Chlorina-1 and Chlorina-9 encode ChlD and ChlI subunits of Mg-chelatase, a key enzyme for chlorophyll synthesis and chloroplast development. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;62:325–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-006-9024-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li C, Hu Y, Huang R, Ma X, Wang Y, Liao T, et al. Mutation of FdC2 gene encoding a ferredoxin-like protein with C-terminal extension causes yellow-green leaf phenotype in rice. Plant Sci. 2015;238:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.06.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. He L, Li M, Qiu Z, Chen D, Zhang G, Wang X, et al. Primary leaf-type ferredoxin 1 participates in photosynthetic electron transport and carbon assimilation in rice. Plant J. 2020;104:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ramamoorthy R, Vishal B, Ramachandran S, Kumar PP. The OsPS1-F gene regulates growth and development in rice by modulating photosynthetic electron transport rate. Plant Cell Rep. 2018;37:377–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2235-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yong H-Y, Zou Z, Kok E-P, Kwan B-H, Chow K, Nasu S, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of leaves and roots in response to sudden increase in salinity in Brassica napus by RNA-seq. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:467395. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/467395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Morgil H, Tardu M, Cevahir G, Kavakli İH. Comparative RNA-seq analysis of the drought-sensitive lentil (Lens culinaris) root and leaf under short- and long- term water deficits. Funct Integr Genomic. 2019;19(5):715–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-019-00675-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ren X, Shan Y, Li X, Fan J, Li Y, Ma L. Application of RNA sequencing to understand the benefits of endophytes in the salt-alkaline resistance of rice seedlings. Environ Exp Bot. 2022;196:104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen S, Xing J, Lan H. Comparative effects of neutral salt and alkaline salt stress on seed germination, early seedling growth and physiological response of a halophyte species Chenopodium glaucum. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(40):9572–81. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sui N, Yang Z, Liu M, Wang B. Identification and transcriptomic profiling of genes involved in increasing sugar content during salt stress in sweet sorghum leaves. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1760-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao Y, Li MC, Konaté MM, Chen L, Das B, Karlovich C, et al. TPM, FPKM, or normalized counts? A comparative study of quantification measures for the analysis of RNA-seq data from the NCI patient-derived models repository. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):269. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02936-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Florea L, Song L, Salzberg SL. Thousands of exon skipping events differentiate among splicing patterns in sixteen human tissues. F1000Res. 2013;2:188. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-188.v2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Huashan Liu from Sun Yat-Sen University for suggestions on writing.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the earmarked funds from National Natural Science Foundation (31270369), the Department of Education of Liaoning Province (LZD202004, LJKZ0991).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoning Ren and Jiahui Fan contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Science, Shenyang Normal University, 110034, Shenyang, China

    Xiaoning Ren, Jiahui Fan, Xin Li, Yu Shan, Lanlan Wang, Lianju Ma, Yueying Li & Xuemei Li

Authors
  1. Xiaoning Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiahui Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lanlan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lianju Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yueying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xuemei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XNR and XML conceptualized the research. XNR, JHF, XL and YS completed the experiment. XNR performed bioinformatic analysis and wrote the original draft. LLW and XML provided the funding acquisition. LJM, YYL and XML supervised the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuemei Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental research and field studies on plants complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The symbol for equal contribution was added.

The original version of this article was revised: Lanlan Wang was missing from the author group. This has been corrected.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Sequencing statistics for rice seedling shoots. Table S2. Statistical analysis of clean data mapped to reference genome. Fig. S1 Validation of the expression level of genes from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) using qRT-PCR. Comparison of fold change (FC) was done by scatter plots using log2(FC) values obtained from RNA-seq and qRT-PCR. Blue dots indicate the DEGs in the Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots at day 1. Pink dots indicate the DEGs in the N+ versus N- rice seedling shoots at day 5. Table S3. Comparison of RNA-seq data and PCR data. Fig. S2 A Venn diagram of DEGs overlapping across the 1 d and 5 d of Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots. B Genes with opposite expression trends in Na2CO3-treated (N+) versus -untreated (N-) rice seedling shoots in 1 d and 5 d. Table S6. Common up-regulated genes in day 1 and day 5. Table S7. Common down-regulated genes in day 1 and day 5. Table S8. Common significantly enriched GO terms in day 1 and day 5. Table S9. Common significantly enriched KEGG pathways in day 1 and day 5. Table S10. Primers used for theqRT-PCR.

Additional file 2: Table S4.

List of DEGs at day 1. Table S5. List of DEGs at day 5.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, X., Fan, J., Li, X. et al. Application of RNA sequencing to understand the response of rice seedlings to salt-alkali stress. BMC Genomics 24, 21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09121-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09121-x

Keywords

  • Bioinformatic
  • Oryza sativa L.
  • RNA-seq
  • Salt-alkali stress

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us