Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genomic adaptation to extreme climate conditions in beef cattle as a consequence of cross-breeding program

BMC Genomics volume 24, Article number: 186 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Understanding the evolutionary forces related to climate changes that have been shaped genetic variation within species has long been a fundamental pursuit in biology. In this study, we generated whole-genome sequence (WGS) data from 65 cross-bred and 45 Mongolian cattle. Together with 62 whole-genome sequences from world-wide cattle populations, we estimated the genetic diversity and population genetic structure of cattle populations. In addition, we performed comparative population genomics analyses to explore the genetic basis underlying variation in the adaptation to cold climate and immune response in cross-bred cattle located in the cold region of China. To elucidate genomic signatures that underlie adaptation to cold climate, we performed three statistical measurements, fixation index (FST), log2 nucleotide diversity (θπ ratio) and cross population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR), and further investigated the results to identify genomic regions under selection for cold adaptation and immune response-related traits.

Results

By generating WGS data, we investigated the population genetic structure and phylogenetic relationship of studied cattle populations. The results revealed clustering of cattle groups in agreement with their geographic distribution. We detected noticeable genetic diversity between indigenous cattle ecotypes and commercial populations. Analysis of population structure demonstrated evidence of shared genetic ancestry between studied cross-bred population and both Red-Angus and Mongolian breeds. Among all studied cattle populations, the highest and lowest levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) per Kb were detected in Holstein and Rashoki populations (ranged from ~ 0.54 to 0.73, respectively). Our search for potential genomic regions under selection in cross-bred cattle revealed several candidate genes related with immune response and cold shock protein on multiple chromosomes. We identified some adaptive introgression genes with greater than expected contributions from Mongolian ancestry into Molgolian x Red Angus composites such as TRPM8, NMUR1, PRKAA2, SMTNL2 and OXR1 that are involved in energy metabolism and metabolic homeostasis. In addition, we detected some candidate genes probably associated with immune response-related traits.

Conclusion

The study identified candidate genes involved in responses to cold adaptation and immune response in cross-bred cattle, including new genes or gene pathways putatively involved in these adaptations. The identification of these genes may clarify the molecular basis underlying adaptation to extreme environmental climate and as such they might be used in cattle breeding programs to select more efficient breeds for cold climate regions.

Peer Review reports

Background

The worldwide demand for animal protein products (such as meat and milk) has greatly increased over the last decades and is expected to grow to about 50% until 2050, resulting in an increased need to improve the efficiency of livestock productivity and their management [1, 2]. Beef production, with annual over 70 million tons of meat, accounted as the largest supplier of red meat for human consumption [3]. China ranks third globally and first in Asia in terms of producing beef [4, 5]. In the last decade, with the rapid development of the Chinese economy, the amount of beef consumption has grown around 30%, ranking second in the world. Inner Mongolia of China with over 25% of the total area of grasslands and around one-fourth of its pasture region has a long history of exercising traditional nomadic pastoralism and remains an important bases of livestock production in the world [6,7,8]. Indigenous livestock of this region have become adapted to their local conditions, such as extreme environmental climate through natural selection. For example, Mongolian indigenous cattle have evolved to survive during tremendously cold winters and have reduced susceptibility to parasites, bacterial and viral infections [9, 10].

In recent decades, efforts have been made to improve the genetic potential of local cattle through crossbreeding with breeds introduced from other geographic regions. So far, various new crossbred populations have been developed with high production capacity and adaptability to different climates [11,12,13]. The new breeds, with their enhanced capacity for rapid growth and adaptation to climate changes, generally combine the favorable traits that characterized their purebred parental breeds through artificial and natural selection since the early 1970s. Among the world-wide commercial beef cattle, Red Angus is one of the most popular beef cattle breeds that has been widely used in crossbreeding programs to improve the carcass quality traits of local breeds. This breed has been separately registered from the black Angus cattle and is well known for its excellent carcass traits including marbling (intra-muscular fat) [14, 15]. As early as in 2000, by crossing this commercial breed with local populations that originated from Mongolian cattle (such as Chinese Steppes Red), a new cross-bred composite was generated with a variety of excellent characteristics, such as good meat quality, rapid growth and high adaptation ability to withstand extreme local climate conditions.

In cattle breeding, genome-wide sequencing has been a powerful way of identifying candidate genes related to body temperature [16] and economically important traits in both purebred and crossbreed populations [17,18,19,20]. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive population genomic analysis of 171 world-wide domestic modern cattle populations distributed across the world to investigate the phylogenetic relationships and identify key genetic variants associated with adaptation to extreme local climate in Mongolia region. Our findings will be helpful in selecting for cattle adapted to extreme environments, specifically in the development of cross-bred composite animals with tolerance for local climate conditions.

Methods

Sample collection and sequencing

Historically, Red angus cattle were imported into China in the year of 1974, with no more than 50 animals. The majority of imported animals were female and semen was imported afterward. Since 2000, cross-breeding program (Mongolian x Red Angus) was started in order to produce animals with high performance capacities. In this study, we generated whole genome sequence (WGS) data from 65 cross-bred beef cattle (Mongolia × Red-Angus) and 45 Mongolian indigenous individuals. We further obtained a total of 61 complete genomes from world-wide cattle populations including; commercial (Red- Angus (n = 10), Hereford (n = 5), Holstein (n = 5) and Jersey (n = 5)) and native (Africa (n = 16), Rashoki (n = 8), Tibetan (n = 7), and Kazakh (n = 5)) cattle from the Sequence Read Archive (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), resulting in a dataset of 171 cattle (Fig. 1A, Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 2: Fig. S1). We further obtained on Yak genome (Bos grunniens) as an outgroup for phylogeny analysis. Red Angus cattle were sampled from one farm at Xilingol in Inner Mongolia, and Mongolian cattle samples were collected from two farms (Tuoxian and Etuoke) in Inner Mongolia. Using the phenolchloroform method, genomic DNA was isolated from blood samples. The quality and concentration of extracted DNA were tested by agarose gel (2%) electrophoresis and NanoDrop spectrophotometer analysis, and then good-quality DNA samples were used for the subsequent whole genome resequencing. The short reads sequence data for all individuals were produced using the Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform, with a read length of 125 bp (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Quality checking, alignments and SNP calling

The quality of the raw reads was explored and visualized by FastQC software (Version 0.4.2) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Adapter sequences and low level quality base pairs were trimmed by Trimmomatic software (version 0.36) [21]. Pair-end reads from the present study and published data that passed the filtering were aligned against the latest bovine reference genome assembly using Burrows Wheeler Aligner (BWA mem, V 0.7.16) [22]. The SAMtools software was used to discard un-mapped and non-unique reads, and for converting mapping results to the SAM (.sam) and BAM (.bam) formats [23]. The preprocessing of alignments, including removing potential PCR duplicates, was performed using Picard toolkit (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). To improve the alignment accuracy, we then performed base quality score recalibration (BQSR) and local indel realignment using Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) tools [24]. Single-individual gVCFs were generated using the GATK HaplotypeCaller, and batches of 172 gVCFs were merged into a single gVCF with option CombineGVCFs. The GATK GenotypeGVCFs tool was then run to generate the joint genotyping of the gVCFs on all of the individuals together to create a raw SNP VCF. Subsequent filtering was further performed according to the GATK Best Practices recommendations. Final variants (~ 14.23 million SNPs) were filtered to be supported by a minimum mapping quality of 25 and a minimum genotype quality of 40. To exclude potential false-positive variant calls from the SNPs, we also used the “VariantFiltration”of GATK with the parameters “QD < 2.0, FS > 60.0, MQ < 40.0, MQRankSum < -12.5, ReadPosRankSum < -8.0 and SOR > 3.0”. In addition, all detected loci with more than two alleles and within clusters (> 3 SNP in a 10-bp window) were further filtered to avoid the potential sequencing errors [25]. After filtering out low-quality loci, the remained variants (around 12.36 million variants) were used for subsequent analyses.

Population genetics analysis

We pruned our data set using PLINK v1.9 software (default settings) to minimize the non-independence of variations with options “–indep-pairwise 50 10 0.2” [26]. We then used the vcf2fq implemented in Samtools [23] to convert filtered VCF file into consensus FASTA file. A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny tree was constructed using FastTree2 software (version 2.1.11) [27]. The topological structure was visualized with online tool iTOL (V6; https://itol.embl.de/). The principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using smartpca of the EIGENSOFT package with the “lsqproject” and “autoshrink” options [28]. To further understand the degree of Admixture in the population, we used the Bayesian clustering method implemented in ADMIXTURE software, with number of ancestral populations (K) ranging from 2 to 5 and 10,000 iterations for each run [29]. Additionally, to study fine-grained population genetic structure across all cattle groups, haplotype sharing patterns were investigated using the algorithm implemented in ChromoPainter/fineSTRUCTURE softwares [30]. Individual inbreeding coefficients (F) were estimated using the PLINK “het” function [26]. To evaluate the recent and historical effective population size (Ne), linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay rates between adjacent SNPs across the whole genome were calculated for each cattle population.

Identification of selective sweeps and adaptive introgression regions related to local adaptation in cross-bred cattle

To identify genomic regions under selection, three different statistical approaches including fixation index (FST), log2 nucleotide diversity (θπ ratio), and cross population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) methods were calculated. For both FST and Pi tests, we set the window size of 50 kb and the sliding step of 25 kb via vcftools (-‐window‐pi 50,000 ‐‐window‐pi‐step 25,000) [31]. For the XP-CLR test statistic, we used the following options: grid size 10 K, sliding windows of 0.1 cM, maximum number of SNPs within each window as 300, and correlation value for 2 SNPs weighted with a cutoff of 0.99. To identify signals of introgression between cross-bred animals and Mongolian cattle, a sliding-window analysis was conducted using Dinvestigate program (fd statistic) to explore whether the admixture signal was confined to specific contigs [32]. We highlighted introgression candidate genes as trios with significant values (Bonferroni-corrected p-value < 0.001) between studies populations.

Results

Dataset, population genetic structure and admixture

Together with the publicly available whole genome data (n = 62), we generated complete genome sequencing data from 65 cross-bred beef cattle (Mongolia × Red-Angus) and 45 Mongolian indigenous individuals (Fig. 1A, Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 2: Fig. S1). After quality filtering, the average sequence depth was ~ 9.8 per each sample (covering from ~ 4.0X to ~ 27.0X), which is an ideal practical depth for discovering accurate variants [33] (Additional file 1: Table S1). To identify genetic relationship between all studied groups, we first reconstructed a rooted ML tree. Based on this tree all commercial cattle breeds were clustered close together and cross-bred animals were formed between Red-Angus and Chinese Kazakh and Mongolian groups (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). We noticed that the majority of Tibetan cattle were located close to the Yak genome, which is in line with previous studies [34]. The same population affinities were also recovered in PCA analyses. The PC1 and PC2 accounted for 11.11% and 4.32% of the total genotypic variance, respectively. The first component was driven by difference between commercial groups and indigenous cattle (Fig. 1B). Commercial cattle groups could further be classified into two major groups, Red-Angus with its cross-bred samples and other cattle populations (Hereford, Holstein and Jersey). ADMIXTURE (from K2 to K5) analysis also recapitulated these findings. Ancestral proportions at K = 2 indicated that Red-Angus cattle and cross-bred animals were mainly assigned to the same cluster, while African individuals were separated from other groups (Fig. 1C). When K = 4, with the lowest CV error (Additional file 2: Fig. S3), we further observed that cross-bred cattle derive from genetic admixture between Mongolia and Red-Angus cattle (Fig. 1C). Our LD decay results show that the r2 scores were the highest at marker pairs distance of 1 Kb (ranged from ~ 0.54 to 0.73, for Rashoki and Holstein cattle, respectively) with a gradual decline with increasing physical distance (up to 50 Kb) and then stable trend (> 50 Kb) (Fig. 1D). The results further show that from marker pairs distance of 1 Kb to ≤ 15 Kb, the decay of LD was more rapid in both Red-Angus and Rashoki groups than other cattle populations, reaching an average r2 values from 0.64 to 0.52 and 0.54 to 0.45, respectively (Fig. 1D). Focusing on all studied indigenous groups, lower r2 values across all genomic distances were found for Rashoki cattle that dwelled in northern parts of Iran country. We next estimated the nucleotide diversity within each cattle population. The results revealed that all commercial cattle have lower genetic diversity than other indigenous breeds, and among native groups, both Rashoki samples from Iran and indigenous cattle from Africa show higher genetic diversity than other populations (Fig. 1E).

Furthermore, we used ChromoPainter together with the finestructure clustering to better characterise the genetic relationship of all studied groups. The obtained findings are summarized into a “co-ancestry matrix”. Each column and each row reveals the result of expected coancestry between each sample and other animals in the whole genome dataset (Additional file 2: Fig. S4). In agreement with admixture estimates (K = 2), the results of painting algorithm show African samples have a lower genetic similarity with other world-wide cattle populations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) Locations of cattle breeds for each geographic groups. Populations are colored to mirror their geographic origin. (B) PCA of cattle populations. (C) ADMIXTURE results for k = 2 to k = 5. (D) The decay of LD estimated as the squared correlation coefficient by pairwise physical distance in cattle populations and (E) Boxplots of nucleotide diversity, calculated in 50 kb sliding window with 20 kb increments across the genome

Full size image

The analysis of patterns of genetic divergence, as a function of θπ, between gene pools of different cattle populations revealed a strong correlation between cross-bred animals and both Red-Angus and Mongolian cattle, which is clearly due to their shared genetic ancestry with these two cattle groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of nucleotide diversity (θπ) (50-kb non-overlapping window) between cross-bred group (green) and different cattle groups; (A) Mongolian cattle, (B) Red-Angus breed and (C) other populations (orange)

Full size image

Additionally, we estimated inbreeding coefficients per each sample (ranged from ~ 0.01 to 0.60) and each cattle group (ranged from 0.05 to 0.55 for Rashoki and Holstein groups, respectively) (Additional file 2: Fig. S5). Among the indigenous cattle, the highest and lowest levels of average inbreeding coefficient were 0.22 and 0.05 for African and Rashoki groups, respectively. The results collectively show that native cattle populations had lower inbreeding coefficient than commercial groups.

Signatures of adaptive introgression in cross-bred cattle

Previous genomic studies have confirmed that crossbreeding between different populations or geographically differentiated subspecies can increase genetic diversity and produce novel allelic combinations by new phenotypic traits [35, 36]. The adaptation of mammals in cold climate habitats may have effect on their phenotypic features, such as increased blood pressure, low serum lipid levels, as well as increased basal metabolic rate [37,38,39]. In this study, to identify adaptive introgression regions from Mongolian cattle into the cross-bred population, we performed fd statistic [32]. Selecting the top 1% of the introgressed regions, we detected several genomic coordinates (919 genes) as high-confidence introgressed segments (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Table S2). The size of introgressed regions varies from several hundreds bp to more than 280 kb base pairs (ranging from 1.266 to 28.333 Kb). We then to explore the genetic architecture of cross-bred population and their adaptive evolution to cold climate conditions, compared their genome sequences with those from Red-Angus cattle, which have been previously imported to China.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Genome-wild introgressions (black lines) from Mongolian cattle into cross-bred population

Full size image

The results of comparative genomic analysis revealed a total of 475 and 394 protein-coding genes in windows with high FST (1% cutoff) and log2 θπ ratio values (1% cutoff), respectively (Fig. 4, Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4). Among the strong selective signals (by both Pi and FST approaches), we localized some candidate genes that were overlapped with those genes that were detected by fd statistics (Table 1). The identified genes are involved in variety of adaptation traits such as climate adaptations (e.g., TRPM8, SMTNL2 and OXR1), energy metabolism (e.g., NMUR1 and PRKAA2), and resistance to parasites (e.g., SIN3A and PLCB4). The overlap of candidate genes between introgression and selective sweep regions may suggest their role in adaptive mechanisms in cross-bred animals. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and KEGG mapping further identified some significantly enriched pathways (FDR %1) related with cold tolerant and energy metabolisms such as “Response to cold” (GO:0009409), “Thermoception” (GO:0050955), “Sensory perception of temperature stimulus” (GO:0050951), “cAMP metabolic process” (GO:0046058) and “cGMP metabolic process” (GO:0046068) (Additional file 1: Tables S5, S6). Based on the comparison of allele frequency spectrum, we additionally applied an XP-CLR test to identify genomic regions under selection. A total number of 362 candidate genes were detected in the top percentiles of approach (1% cutoff) (Additional file 2: Fig. S6; Additional file 1: Table S7). The functional enrichment analysis results on these candidate genes again highlighted the involvement of gene pathways related with cold tolerant and energy metabolisms such as “Thermoception” (GO:0050955), “Response to temperature stimulus” (GO:0009266), and “Detection of temperature stimulus” (GO:0009581) (Additional file 1: Table S8).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Genomic regions with selection signals in cross-bred cattle group. (A) Distribution of the pairwise fixation index (FST) (y axis) and θπ ln ratio (x axis) between Red-Angus cattle and cross-bred group. (B) Selection signals around TRPM8. FST based on SNPs is shown as a line using a nonoverlapping 10-kb sliding window

Full size image
Table 1 Overlapped genes identified by signature selection methods (FST, log2 θπ ratio and XP-CLR) and fd statistics, which are involved in adaptation traits to climate change in cross-bred cattle
Full size table

Discussion

Genetic diversity and population structure

In the present study, WGS data were used to analyze patterns of genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships of world-wide cattle populations. This information is essential towards improvement of genetic potential of local cattle populations. In agreement with previous studies [20, 40], phylogeny analysis showed clear separation between commercial cattle groups and indigenous populations. However, all samples from African cattle were clearly distinguishable from the other native breeds, Kazakh and Mongolian groups were clustered close together in either the phylogenetic tree and PCA, indicating the possibility of shared genetic components between these two Northwest Chinese breeds [34]. The distance patterns between studied groups was also observed by PCA and Admixture analysis. The cluster results indicated that cross-bred individuals had a close relationship with both Red-Angus and Mongolian cattle breeds, which is in accordance with their breeding history involving crossbreeding and selection. Furthermore, results from Bayesian-model clustering analysis showed high amount of shared genetic admixture between cross-bred cattle and Red-Angus breed, rather than Mongolian cattle, suggesting local farmers have been focused extensively on both growth rate and meat production traits in their crossbreeding programs. Estimating the patterns of genetic divergence further showed a strong correlation of nucleotide diversity between Red-Angus cattle and Cross-bred animals (Fig. 2).

Consistent with most previous studies, we observed that the commercial cattle populations harbor lower levels of genetic diversity, as compared with the indigenous groups, which could be the result of intensive artificial selection over generations [20, 34, 40]. Furthermore, we found that Jersey cattle had the lowest genetic diversity which is in line with the previous reports that have pointed out this cattle breed has experienced extensive inbreeding depression than other dairy cattle populations [41]. The relatively high level of nucleotide diversity in Rashoki cattle may reflect weaker, targeted, and shorter selection history in this populations. The pattern of LD decay can provide valuable insights into population history, including breeding systems and evolution of a population [42,43,44]. In this study, the LD values among SNPs decreased with increasing physical distance, which is in accordance with studies on different livestock species [42, 45]. The relatively low levels of LD in the entire genome of cross-bred animals are probably the result of past admixture events between Red-Angus and Mongolian cattle that have been experienced due to genetic improvement of local cattle breeds for meat production traits. We notice that as the genomic distance increased, all indigenous cattle groups followed the same pattern of decrease in LD, however more rapid decrease in LD over increasing genetic distance were identified in both Red-Angus and Rashoki, which may be due to differences in effective population size of these two cattle breeds.

The adaptation of cross-bred cattle to environmental stresses

Although climate has a profound effect on the survival of organisms, our knowledge about the genomic mechanisms of cattle adaptation to extreme local climate (such as cold adaptation) is limited. Genomic studies have confirmed that the cross-bred populations may have the advantage of adaptability to both climate change and diseases resistance [46, 47]. Red-Angus has been derived from the Aberdeen Angus and is becoming an increasingly popular component of the agricultural sector. This breed is widely used in crossbreeding programs in local areas and has been noted for its high quality carcass traits [48]. In recent times, by crossing this breed with local cattle in Mongolia, a new synthetic cross-bred population with excellent tolerance to cold stresses has been generated.

In this study, by performing whole-genome selection scans between cross-bred animals and Red-Angus cattle, several genomic regions were found to be in the high-confidence selection regions (highest 1% of FST, XP-CLR and log2 θπ ratio values) (Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4 and S7). In addition, by overlapping these results with those obtained from the introgression analysis, we identified some candidate genes that are related to environmental adaptation and metabolic homeostasis (such as; TRPM8, NMUR1, OXR1, PRKAA2 and SMTNL2), as well as immune response (e.g. PLCB4 and SIN3A) (Table 1). The TRPM8 gene was detected as a candidate gene in a selective sweep region located on bovine chromosome (BTA) 3, which consistently shows high signal values in FST and XP-CLR analyses as well as the log2 θπ ratio(top 1% cutoff) (Fig. 4B, Additional file 2: Fig. S6). This gene encodes an ion channel that plays a critical role in mammalian thermosensation [49, 50]. Previous studies have suggested that TRPM8 gene is activated by cold and cooling compounds, which makes it an important candidate as the molecular mediator of cold adaptation. Genetic variation of this gene has been reported in different species [51,52,53]. It has been demonstrated that the proteins encoded by this gene in brown adipocytes are involved in the regulation of body temperature, and are necessary for the survival of newborns and hibernating mammals [54]. Furthermore, it has been documented that the absence of TRPM8 gene in some fish species can remarkably facilitate their colonization in a large range of climate zones [55]. NMUR1 gene (also called GPR66/FM-3) is located on BTA 2 (119.283-119.294 Mb) and belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptors. Considering the important function of this gene in several important physiological functions such as energy expenditure, stress responses, feeding behavior and circadian rhythm, this gene is an important candidate for adaptation to climate change in cross-bred animals [56,57,58]. PLCB4, a phospholipase C beta 4, is a key player in different cellular processes such as neural signaling, cell growth and synaptic plasticity [59]. It has been reported that this gene is involved in regulating immune defense, energy metabolism and oxidative stress response in several species. A more recent study has also suggested that PLCB4 gene may related with immune response and environmental temperature in native chicken ecotypes [60].

Conclusion

By applying whole-genome sequencing analysis, we were able to highlight candidate genes involved in responses to cold adaptation and immune response, including new genes such as TRPM8, NMUR1, PRKAA2, SMTNL2 and OXR1 or gene pathways (e.g. Response to cold, Thermoception and Sensory perception of temperature stimulus) putatively involved in these adaptations. These findings can therefore inform targeted genomic in vivo, and in vitro studies to further explore hypotheses arising from our study, and to investigate underlying genomic mechanisms.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available at NCBI SRA Database with accession code: PRJNA896136 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

Abbreviations

GATK:

Genome Analysis Toolkit

VCF:

Variant Calling File

BWA:

Burrows-Wheeler Aligner

F ST :

Fixation index

LD:

linkage disequilibrium

GO:

Gene ontology

θπ:

nucleotide diversity

PCA:

principal component analysis

ROH:

Runs of homozygosity

SNP:

single-nucleotide polymorphism

GCTA:

genome-wide complex trait analysis

References

  1. Hume DA, Whitelaw CBA, Archibald AL. The future of animal production: improving productivity and sustainability. J Agric Sci. 2011;149:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Makkar HPS. Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change, Anim.12 (2018) 1744–1754.

  3. FAO., 2020. Food Outlook – Biannual Report on Global Food Markets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/3/ca9509en/ca9509en.pdf.

  4. Greenwood PL. Review: an overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Anim. 2021;15:100295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li XZ, Yan CG, Zan LS. Current situation and future prospects for beef production in China. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31:984–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohanty M, Baum R, Ma R, Mathew G. Grass-roots democracy in India and China: the right to participate. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132101130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li W, Huntsinger L. China’s grassland contract policy and its impacts on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: tragic feedbacks,Ecol. Soc.16 (2) 2011.

  8. Wang J, Brown DG, Agrawal A. Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods: a comparative study of herder communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia, China, Glob. Environ Change. 2013;23:1673–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu L, Brito LF, Abbas Z, Sammad A, Kang L, Wang D, Wu H, Liu A, Qi G, Zhao M, Wang Y, Xu Q. Investigating the short-term Effects of Cold stress on metabolite responses and metabolic Pathways in Inner-Mongolia Sanhe cattle. Anim. 2021;11:249.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xing Y, Qi Y, Purev C, Wang S, Wang H, Wu K, Cao J, Liu C, Liu Y, Li L, Zhang Y, Zhou H. Structural variants in Mongolian originated ruminant: role in adaptation of extreme-environment, bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-17431/v1.

  11. Paim TDP, Hay EHA, Wilson C, Thomas MG, Kuehn LA, Paiva SR, McManus C, Blackburn HD. Dynamics of genomic architecture during composite breed development in cattle. Anim Genet. 2020;51:224–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim ES, Rothschild MF. Genomic adaptation of admixed dairy cattle in East Africa. Front Genet. 2014;5:443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Favero R, Menezes GRO, Torres RAA, Silva LOC, Bonin MN, Feijó GLD, Altrak G, Niwa MVG, Kazama R, Mizubuti IY, Gomes RC. Crossbreeding applied to systems of beef cattle production to improve performance traits and carcass quality. Anim. 2019;13:2679–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Márquez GC, Speidel SE, Enns RM, Garrick DJ. Genetic diversity and population structure of American Red Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu JH, Gong H, Luan QJ, Xue L, Sun HL, Wang F. Transcriptome reveals that genic SNPs contributes to heterosis in cattle, Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Biological Sciences and Technology (BST 2017). 2 (2018).

  16. Igoshin AV, Yurchenko AA, Belonogova NM, Petrovsky DV, Aitnazarov RB et al. Genome-wide association study and scan for signatures of selection point to candidate genes for body temperature maintenance under the cold stress in Siberian cattle populations.BMC Genet.20 (2019).

  17. Bolormaa S, Porto Neto LR, Zhang YD, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Goddard ME, et al. A genome-wide association study of meat and carcass traits in australian cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:2297–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu D, Sargolzaei M, Kelly M, Vander Voort G, Wang Z, Mandell I, et al. Genome-wide association analyses for carcass quality in crossbred beef cattle. BMC Genet. 2013;14:80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mateescu RG, Garrick DJ, Reecy JM. Network Analysis reveals putative genes affecting meat quality in Angus cattle. Front Genet. 2017;8:171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Asadollahpour-Nanaei H, Dehghani-Qanatqestani M, Esmailizadeh A. Whole-genome resequencing reveals selection signatures associated with milk production traits in african Kenana dairy zebu cattle. Genomics. 2020;112:880–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinform. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinform. 2009;15:1754–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup, the sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinform. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Esmailizadeh A, Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A, Han J, Wu DD, Li Y, Zhang YP. Comparative population genomic analysis uncovers novel genomic footprints and genes associated with small body size in chinese pony. BMC Genom. 2020;21:496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010 (2010): e9490.

  28. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals, Genome Res. 2009 (2009) 1655–64.

  30. Lawson DJ, Hellenthal G, Myers S, Falush D. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. Plos Genet. 2012;8:e1002453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinform. 2011;27:2156–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Malinsky M, Matschiner M, Svardal H. Dsuite-fast D-statistics and related admixture evidence from VCF files. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21:584–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang Y, Jiang Y, Wang S, Zhang Q, Ding X. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs. BMC Bioinform. 2019;8:556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen N, Cai Y, Chen Q, Li R, Wang K, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04737-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Riley DG, Chase CC Jr, Coleman SW, Olson TA, Randel RD. Evaluation of tropically adapted straightbred and crossbred beef cattle: Heifer age and size at first conception and characteristics of their first calves. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:3173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Osei-Amponsah R, Kwaku Asem E, Yeboah F, Obese. Cattle crossbreeding for sustainable milk production in the tropics. Int J Livest Prod. 2020;4:108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leonard WR, Snodgrass JJ, Sorensen MV. Metabolic adaptations in indigenous siberian populations. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2005;34:451–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bjerregaard P, Dewailly E, Young TK, Blanchet C, Hegele RA, et al. Blood pressure among the Inuit (Eskimo) populations in the Arctic. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31:92–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Snodgrass JJ, Leonard WR, Sorensen MV, Tarskaia LA, Mosher MJ. The influence of basal metabolic rate on blood pressure among indigenous Siberians. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008;137:145–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim J, Hanotte O, Mwai OA, Dessie T, Bashir S, et al. The genome landscape of indigenous african cattle. Genome Biol. 2017;18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1153-y.

  41. Huson HJ, Sonstegard TS, Godfrey J, Hambrook D, Wolfe C, Wiggans G, et al. A genetic investigation of island Jersey cattle, the foundation of the Jersey breed: comparing population structure and selection to Guernsey, Holstein, and United States Jersey cattle. Front Genet. 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00366.

  42. Nosrati M, Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Amiri Ghanatsaman Z, Esmailizadeh A. Whole genome sequence analysis to detect signatures of positive selection for high fecundity in sheep. Reprod Domest Anim. 2019;54:358–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mueller JC. Linkage disequilibrium for different scales and applications. Brief Bioinform. 2004;5:355–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nosratia M, Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Javanmard A, Esmailizadeh A. The pattern of runs of homozygosity and genomic inbreeding in world-wide sheep populations. Genomics. 2021;113:1407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mohamadipoor Saadatabadi L, Mohammadabadi M, Amiri Ghanatsaman Z, Babenko O, Stavetska R, et al. Signature selection analysis reveals candidate genes associated with production traits in iranian sheep breeds. BMC Vet Res. 2021;369. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03077-4.

  46. Passamonti MM, Somenzi E, Barbato M, Chillemi G, Colli L, Joost S, et al. The Quest for genes involved in adaptation to climate change in ruminant livestock. Animals. 2021;28:2833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hasib FMY, Islam MS, Das T, Rana EA, Uddin MH, Bayzid M, et al. Lumpy skin disease outbreak in cattle population of Chattogram, Bangladesh. Vet Med Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.524.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Krehbiel BC. Evaluation of population genetic structure in two British Bos Taurus breeds across five U.S. climate zones. (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/10217/181393

  49. Dhaka A, Murray AN, Mathur J, Earley TJ, Petrus MJ, Patapoutian A. TRPM8 is required for Cold Sensation in mice. Neuron. 2007;54:371–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Myers BR, Sigal YM, Julius D. Evolution of thermal response properties in a cold-activated TRP channel. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Babenko VN, Isakova ZT, Talaibekova ET, Asambaeva DA, Kobzev VF, Potapova TA, et al. Polymorphism in the TRP8 gene in Kyrgyz population: putative association with highland adaptation. Russ J Genet Appl Res. 2016;6:605–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Reimúndez A, Fernández-Peña C, García G, Fernández R, Ordás P, Gallego R, Pardo-Vazquez JL, et al. Deletion of the cold thermoreceptor TRPM8 increases heat loss and food intake leading to reduced body temperature and obesity in mice. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1310.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Igoshin AV, Gunbin KV, Yudin NS, Voevoda MI. Searching for signatures of cold climate adaptation in TRPM8 gene in populations of east asian ancestry. Front Genet. 2019;10:759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yamashita H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Furuyama T, Kontani Y, Sato Y, Mori N. Impaired basal thermal homeostasis in rats lacking capsaicin-sensitive peripheral small sensory neurons. J Biochem. 2008;143:385–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gracheva EO, Bagriantsev SN. Evolutionary adaptation to thermosensation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;34:67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hanada R, Teranishi H, Pearson JT, Kurokawa M, Hosoda H, Fukushima N, et al. Neuromedin U has a novel anorexigenic effect independent of the leptin signaling pathway. Nat Med. 2004;10:1067–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nakahara K, Hanada R, Murakami N, Teranishi H, Ohgusu H, Fukushima N, et al. The gut–brain peptide neuromedin U is involved in the mammalian circadian oscillator system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;318:156–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Malendowicz LK, Rucinski M. Neuromedins NMU and NMS: an updated overview of their functions. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:713961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Okada Y, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Matsuda K, Hosono N, Ohmiya H, et al. Common variations in PSMD3-CSF3 and PLCB4 are associated with neutrophil count.[J]. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:2079–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Kharrati-Koopaee H, Esmailizadeh A. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection for heat tolerance and immune response in iranian native chickens. BMC Genom. 2022;23:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08434-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Spencer-Jones NJ, Ge D, Snieder H, Perks U, Swaminathan R, Spector TD, et al. AMP-kinase alpha2 subunit gene PRKAA2 variants are associated with total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in normal women. J Med Genet. 2006;43:936–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Ross FA, MacKintosh C, Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase: a cellular energy sensor that comes in 12 flavours. FEBS J. 2016;283:2987–3001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Tian S, Zhou X, Phuntsok T, Zhao N, Zhang D, Ning C et al. Genomic Analyses Reveal Genetic Adaptations to Tropical Climates in Chickens. IScience. 23 (2020) 101644.

  64. Kalaldeh MA, Gibson J, Lee SH, Gondro C, van der Werf JHJ. Detection of genomic regions underlying resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in australian sheep. Genet Sel Evol. 2019;51:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0479-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang W, Zhang X, Zhou X, Zhang Y, La Y, Zhang Y, et al. Deep Genome Resequencing reveals Artificial and Natural selection for visual deterioration, Plateau adaptability and high prolificacy in Chinese Domestic Sheep. Front Genet. 2019;10:300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Sellayah D, Sikder D. Orexin receptor-1 mediates brown fat developmental differentiation. Adipocyte. 2012;1:58–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.T and H.A.N was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Funding

Inner Mongolia key technologies R&D program (2020GG0069), Inner Mongolia key technologies R&D program and technological transformative project (2022YFYZ0011), Inner Mongolia major science and technology program (2021ZD0009), National Natural Science Foundation (32060731 and 32050410304), “Kejixingmeng” Key special project of Ordos (2022EEDSKJXM012).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, China

    Rugang Tian, Hojjat Asadollahpour Nanaie, Xiao Wang, Baolige Dalai, Meng Zhao, Fenf Wang, Hui Li, Ding Yang, Hao Zhang, Yuan Li & Tingyue Wang

  2. Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China

    Hojjat Asadollahpour Nanaie

  3. Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, As, Norway

    Tu Luan

  4. College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao, China

    Jianghong Wu

Authors
  1. Rugang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hojjat Asadollahpour Nanaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Baolige Dalai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fenf Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ding Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tingyue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tu Luan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jianghong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.A.N., R.T., and J.W., lead the project, and designed and conceived the study. R.T., provided whole genome samples. H.A.N., and R.T., analyzed and interpreted the data. H.A.N., X.W., M.Z., B.D., and T.W., drafted the manuscript. H.A.N., and R.T., revised the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rugang Tian or Jianghong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (https://arriveguidelines.org/). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. No cattle animal during this study was slaughtered and harmed. All experimental protocols and blood sampling procedure were approved by ethic committee of department of animal science in Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China (Permit number: 2021-20211548).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional file 1

Additional file 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, R., Asadollahpour Nanaie, H., Wang, X. et al. Genomic adaptation to extreme climate conditions in beef cattle as a consequence of cross-breeding program. BMC Genomics 24, 186 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09235-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09235-2

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us